80 FR 51281 - Notice To Propose the Redesignation of the Service Delivery Area for the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah)
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Indian Health Service Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 163 (August 24, 2015)
Indian Health Service
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 163 (August 24, 2015)
| Page Range | 51281-51288 | |
| FR Document | 2015-20781 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 163 (Monday, August 24, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 51281-51288] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-20781] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Indian Health Service Notice To Propose the Redesignation of the Service Delivery Area for the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) AGENCY: Indian Health Service, HHS. ACTION: Notice. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This notice advises the public that the Indian Health Service (IHS) proposes to expand the geographic boundaries of the Service Delivery Area for the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) of Massachusetts. The Aquinnah service delivery area is currently comprised of members of the Tribe residing in Martha's Vineyard, Dukes County in the State of Massachusetts. The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) recognized the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head on February 10, 1987. Martha's Vineyard, Dukes County was designated as the Aquinnah service delivery area in the Wampanoag Tribal Council of Gay Head, Inc., Indian Claims Settlement Act of 1987, Public Law 100-95. DATES: Comments must be submitted September 23, 2015. ADDRESSES: Because of staff and resource limitations, we cannot accept comments by facsimile (FAX) transmission. You may submit comments in one of four ways (please choose only one of the ways listed): 1. Electronically. You may submit electronic comments on this regulation to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the ``Submit a Comment'' instructions. 2. By regular mail. You may mail written comments to the following address ONLY: Betty Gould, Regulations Officer, Indian Health Service, 801 Thompson Avenue, TMP STE 450, Rockville, Maryland 20852. Please allow sufficient time for mailed comments to be received before the close of the comment period. 3. By express or overnight mail. You may send written comments to the above address. 4. By hand or courier. If you prefer, you may deliver (by hand or courier) your written comments before the close of the comment period to the address above. If you intend to deliver your comments to the Rockville address, please call telephone number (301) 443-1116 in advance to schedule your arrival with a staff member. Comments will be made available for public inspection at the Rockville address from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday-Friday, two weeks after publication of this notice. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl Harper, Director, Office of Resource Access and Partnerships, Indian Health Service, 801 Thompson Avenue, Suite 360, Rockville, Maryland 20852. Telephone 301/443-2694 (This is not a toll free number). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Inspection of Public Comments: All comments received before the close of the comment period are available for viewing by the public, including any personally identifiable or confidential business information that is included in a comment. Background: The IHS currently provides services under regulations codified at 42 CFR part 136, subparts A through C. Subpart C defines a Contract Health Service Delivery Area (CHSDA), now known as a Purchased/Referred Care (PRC) Service Delivery Area, as the geographic area within which PRC will be made available by the IHS to members of an identified Indian community who reside in the area. Residence in a PRC service delivery area by a person who is within the scope of the Indian health program, as set forth in 42 CFR 136.12, creates no legal entitlement to PRC but only potential eligibility for services. Services needed but not available at an IHS/Tribal facility are provided under the PRC program depending on the availability of funds, the person's relative medical priority, and the actual availability and accessibility of alternate resources in accordance with the regulations. As applicable to the Tribes, these regulations provide that, unless otherwise designated, a PRC service delivery area shall consist of a county which includes all or part of a reservation and any county or counties which have a common boundary with the reservation. (42 CFR 136.22(a)(6) (2014)). The regulations also provide that after consultation with the Tribal governing body or bodies on those reservations included within the PRC service delivery area, the Secretary may from time to time, redesignate areas within the United States for inclusion in or exclusion from a PRC service delivery area. The regulations require that certain criteria must be considered before any redesignation is made. The criteria are as follows: (1) The number of Indians residing in the area proposed to be so included or excluded; (2) Whether the Tribal governing body has determined that Indians residing in [[Page 51282]] the area near the reservation are socially and economically affiliated with the Tribes; (3) The geographic proximity to the reservation of the area whose inclusion or exclusion is being considered; and (4) The level of funding which would be available for the provision of PRC. Additionally, the regulations require that any redesignation of a PRC service delivery area must be made in accordance with the Administrative Procedures Act (5 U.S.C. 553). In compliance with this requirement, we are publishing this proposal and requesting public comments. The Tribe's PRC Service Delivery Area is currently defined, both administratively and statutorily, as consisting only of Martha's Vineyard, Dukes County. The Wampanoag Tribal Council of Gay Head, Inc., Indian Claims Settlement Act of 1987 provides, among other items, that ``[f]or the purpose of eligibility for Federal services made available to members of federally recognized Indian tribes, because of their status as Indians, members of this tribe residing on Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts, shall be deemed to be living on or near an Indian reservation.'' 25 U.S.C. .l771i; see also 75 FR 20608 (Apr. 20, 2010). Because the statute defines which members of the Tribe live ``on or near [the] reservation'' for purposes of all Federal services for which that consideration is relevant, this eligibility definition applies to PRC. IHS adopted the Congressionally-defined service delivery area for the purposes of administering benefits under the IHS PRC program via an IHS Director Decision memo on October 14, 1987. Thus, members of the Tribe who reside outside of Martha's Vineyard, Dukes County do not reside within the Aquinnah's PRC service delivery area and are currently not eligible for PRC from the Aquinnah. Historically, IHS has established and maintained service delivery areas in accordance with Congressional intent, as evidenced by geographically designated areas identified in recognition or settlement acts, such as Public Law 100-95. Indeed, IHS has said that with respect to the Aquinnah Tribe, the Secretary's discretion to redesignate the Tribe's PRC service delivery area is superseded by the geographic limitation in the Tribe's Settlement Act of 1987, and accordingly, in a December 2, 2011 letter to the Tribe, IHS declined Aquinnah's proposal to serve non-resident members residing outside of Dukes County, Massachusetts, through its PRC program. At the insistence of the Tribe, IHS has reevaluated the Agency's position. While IHS does not intend to abandon its historic practice, IHS has reviewed the Aquinnah's request and believes that unique circumstances are present that warrant expanding the Aquinnah PRC service delivery area beyond the limits identified by Congress in Public Law 100-95. These unique circumstances include the factors identified by the BIA in recognizing the Aquinnah prior to the enactment of Public Law 100-95, IHS's prior decision to provide sanitation services to Aquinnah members residing on the mainland outside of the existing PRC service delivery area, Dukes County's status as an island and the significant number of Tribal members that reside permanently off of the island but continue to maintain close economic and social ties with the Aquinnah. The BIA recognized the Aquinnah Tribe as an Indian Tribe eligible for Federal benefits on February 10, 1987, pursuant to a notice published in the Federal Register. See 52 FR 4193. As part of its findings, BIA concluded ``that the [Aquinnah] have an extensive and interrelated communication network connecting those Wampanoag members in Gay Head and elsewhere on Martha's Vineyard with each other and with those members living off-island.'' The BIA further concluded that the Tribal government ``maintained political influence and/or authority over both its resident and non-resident members.'' In 1997, IHS authorized sanitation services to non-resident members of the Aquinnah Tribe residing in the counties of Barnstable, Bristol, Norfolk, Plymouth and Dukes Counties in the State of Massachusetts, specifically finding that the service area for sanitation facilities construction was not limited to the Tribal health program service area (Dukes County). Finally, Aquinnah has a significant number of members who are not residents of Dukes County. According to Tribal estimates, 268 enrolled Aquinnah members are non-residents who remain actively involved with the Tribe, reside in Barnstable, Bristol, Norfolk, Plymouth and Suffolk Counties and are not currently eligible for PRC care. Aquinnah provides limited direct services to its Tribal members by operating a small clinic in Dukes County that is open once or twice a month. To access direct care services, non-residents must travel over one and a half hours via ferry and car to receive the health care offered at the clinic. As a consequence, most non-residents do not seek care on the island. Accordingly, the purpose of this Federal Register notice is to notify the public of the proposal to expand the Aquinnah service delivery area to include Barnstable, Bristol, Norfolk, Plymouth and Suffolk Counties in the State of Massachusetts. The proposed notice will expand their current service delivery area which incorporates Martha's Vineyard, Dukes County in the State of Massachusetts to include Barnstable, Bristol, Norfolk, Plymouth and Suffolk Counties in the State of Massachusetts. Under 42 CFR 136.23 those otherwise eligible Indians who do not reside on a reservation but reside within a PRC service delivery area must be either members of the Tribe or maintain close economic and social ties with the Tribe. In this case, in applying the aforementioned PRC service delivery area redesignation criteria required by operative regulations (43 FR 34654), the following findings are made: 1. By expanding, the Tribe estimates the current eligible population will be increased by 268. 2. The Tribe has determined that these 268 individuals are socially and economically affiliated with the Tribe. 3. The expanded area including Barnstable, Bristol, Norfolk, Plymouth, and Suffolk Counties in the State of Massachusetts are across the Bay from Martha's Vineyard, Dukes County, Massachusetts. 4. Generally, the Tribal members located in these counties currently do not use the Indian health system for their health care needs. The Tribe will use its existing Federal allocation for PRC funds to provide services to the expanded population. No additional financial resources will be allocated by IHS to the Tribe to provide services to Tribal members residing in these counties nor should this expansion be construed to have any present or future effect on the allocation of resources between Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe and Aquinnah. [[Page 51283]] Purchased/Referred Care Service Delivery Areas and Service Delivery Areas ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Tribe/Reservation County/State ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ak Chin Indian Community of the Pinal, AZ. Maricopa (Ak Chin) Indian Reservation, Arizona. Alabama-Coushatta Tribes of Texas...... Polk, TX.\1\ Alaska................................. Entire State.\2\ Arapahoe Tribe of the Wind River Hot Springs, WY, Fremont, WY, Reservation, Wyoming. Sublette, WY. Aroostook Band of Micmacs.............. Aroostook, ME.\3\ Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Daniels, MT, McCone, MT, Fort Peck Indian Reservation, Montana. Richland, MT, Roosevelt, MT, Sheridan, MT, Valley, MT. Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Ashland, WI, Iron, WI. Tribe of Chippewa Indians of the Bad River Reservation, Wisconsin. Bay Mills Indian Community, Michigan... Chippewa, MI. Blackfeet Tribe of the Blackfeet Indian Glacier, MT, Pondera, MT. Reservation of Montana. Brigham City Intermountain School \4\ Health Center, Utah. Burns Paiute Tribe..................... Harney, OR. California............................. Entire State, except for the counties listed in the footnote.\5\ Catawba Indian Nation.................. All Counties in SC,\6\ Cabarrus, NC, Cleveland, NC, Gaston, NC, Mecklenburg, NC, Rutherford, NC, Union, NC. Cayuga Nation.......................... Allegany, NY,\7\ Cattaraugus, NY, Chautauqua, NY, Erie, NY, Warren, PA. Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe of the Corson, SD, Dewey, SD, Haakon, Cheyenne River Reservation, South SD, Meade, SD, Perkins, SD, Dakota. Potter, SD, Stanley, SD, Sully, SD, Walworth, SD, Ziebach, SD. Chippewa-Cree Indians of the Rocky Chouteau, MT, Hill, MT, Boy's Reservation, Montana. Liberty, MT. Chitimacha Tribe of Louisiana.......... St. Mary Parish, LA. Cocopah Tribe of Arizona............... Yuma, AZ, Imperial, CA. Coeur D'Alene Tribe.................... Benewah, ID, Kootenai, ID, Latah, ID, Spokane, WA, Whitman, WA. Colorado River Indian Tribes of the La Paz, AZ, Riverside, CA, San Colorado River Indian Reservation, Bernardino, CA, Yuma, AZ. Arizona and California. Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes Flathead, MT, Lake, MT, of the Flathead Reservation. Missoula, MT, Sanders, MT. Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Klickitat, WA, Lewis, WA, Yakama Nation. Skamania, WA,\8\ Yakima, WA. Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians Benton, OR,\9\ Clackamas, OR, of Oregon. Lane, OR, Lincoln, OR, Linn, OR, Marion, OR, Multnomah, OR, Polk, OR, Tillamook, OR, Washington, OR, Yam Hill, OR. Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Grays Harbor, WA, Lewis, WA, Reservation. Thurston, WA. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Chelan, WA,\10\ Douglas, WA, Reservation, Washington. Ferry, WA, Grant, WA, Lincoln, WA, Okanogan, WA, Stevens, WA. Confederated Tribes of the Coos, Lower Coos, OR,\11\ Curry, OR, Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians. Douglas, OR, Lane, OR, Lincoln, OR. Confederated Tribes of the Goshute Nevada, Juab, UT, Toole, UT. Reservation, Nevada and Utah. Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Polk, OR,\12\ Washington, OR, Community of Oregon. Marion, OR, Yamhill, OR, Tillamook, OR, Multnomah, OR. Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Umatilla, OR, Union, OR. Indian Reservation. Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Clackamas, OR, Jefferson, OR, Reservation of Oregon. Linn, OR, Marion, OR, Wasco, OR. Coquille Indian Tribe.................. Coos, OR, Curry, OR, Douglas, OR, Jackson, OR, Lane, OR. Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana........... Allen Parish, LA, Elton, LA.\13\ Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Coos, OR,\14\ Deshutes, OR, Indians. Douglas, OR, Jackson, OR, Josephine, OR, Klamath, OR, Lane, OR. Cowlitz Indian Tribe................... Clark, WA, Cowlitz, WA, King, WA, Lewis, WA, Pierce, WA, Skamania, WA, Thurston, WA, Columbia, OR,\15\ Kittitas, WA, Wahkiakum, WA. Crow Creek Sioux Tribe of the Crow Brule, SD, Buffalo, SD, Hand, Creek Reservation, South Dakota. SD, Hughes, SD, Hyde, SD, Lyman, SD, Stanley, SD. Crow Tribe of Montana.................. Big Horn, MT, Carbon, MT, Treasure, MT,\16\ Yellowstone, MT, Big Horn, WY, Sheridan, WY. Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians....... Cherokee, NC, Graham, NC, Haywood, NC, Jackson, NC, Swain, NC. Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe of South Moody, SD. Dakota. Forest County Potawatomi Community, Forest, WI, Marinette, WI, Wisconsin. Oconto, WI. Fort Belknap Indian Community of the Blaine, MT, Phillips, MT. Fort Belknap Reservation of Montana. Fort McDermitt Paiute and Shoshone Nevada, Malheur, OR. Tribes of the Fort McDermitt Indian Reservation, Nevada and Oregon. Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation, Arizona.. Maricopa, AZ. Fort Mojave Indian Tribe of Arizona, Nevada, Mohave, AZ, San California and Nevada. Bernardino, CA. Gila River Indian Community of the Gila Maricopa, AZ, Pinal, AZ. River Indian Reservation, Arizona. Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Antrim, MI,\17\ Benzie, MI, Chippewa Indians, Michigan. Charlevoix, MI, Grand Traverse, MI, Leelanau, MI, Manistee, MI. Hannahville Indian Community, Michigan. Delta, MI, Menominee, MI. Haskell Indian Health Center........... Douglas, KS.\18\ Havasupai Tribe of the Havasupai Coconino, AZ. Reservation, Arizona. Ho-Chunk Nation of Wisconsin........... Adams, WI,\19\ Clark, WI, Columbia, WI, Crawford, WI, Dane, WI, Eau Claire, WI, Houston, MN, Jackson, WI, Juneau, WI, La Crosse, WI, Marathon, WI, Monroe, WI, Sauk, WI, Shawano, WI, Vernon, WI, Wood, WI. Hoh Indian Tribe....................... Jefferson, WA. [[Page 51284]] Hopi Tribe of Arizona.................. Apache, AZ, Coconino, AZ, Navajo, AZ. Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians....... Aroostook, ME.\20\ Hualapai Indian Tribe of the Hualapai Coconino, AZ, Mohave, AZ, Indian Reservation, Arizona. Yavapai, AZ. Iowa Tribe of Kansas and Nebraska...... Brown, KS, Doniphan, KS, Richardson, NE. Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe.............. Clallam, WA, Jefferson, WA. Jena Band of Choctaw Indians........... Grand Parish, LA,\21\ LaSalle Parish, LA, Rapides Parish, LA. Jicarilla Apache Nation, New Mexico.... Archuleta, CO, Rio Arriba, NM, Sandoval, NM. Kaibab Band of Paiute Indians of the Coconino, AZ, Mohave, AZ, Kane, Kaibab Indian Reservation, Arizona. UT. Kalispel Indian Community of the Pend Oreille, WA, Spokane, WA. Kalispel Reservation. Kewa Pueblo, New Mexico................ Sandoval, NM, Santa Fe, NM. Keweenaw Bay Indian Community, Michigan Baraga, MI, Houghton, MI, Ontonagon, MI. Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas.... Maverick, TX.\22\ Kickapoo Tribe of Indians of the Brown, KS, Jackson, KS. Kickapoo Reservation in Kansas. Klamath Tribes......................... Klamath, OR.\23\ Koi Nation of Northern California Lake, CA, Sonoma, CA.\24\ (formerly known as Lower Lake Rancheria, California). Kootenai Tribe of Idaho................ Boundary, ID. Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Sawyer, WI. Superior Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin. Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Iron, WI, Oneida, WI, Vilas, Chippewa Indians of the Lac du WI. Flambeau Reservation of Wisconsin. Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake Superior Gogebic, MI. Chippewa Indians of Michigan. Little River Band of Ottawa Indians, Kent, MI,\25\ Muskegon, MI, Michigan. Newaygo, MI, Oceana, MI, Ottawa, MI, Manistee, MI, Mason, MI, Wexford, MI, Lake, MI. Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Alcona, MI,\25\ Alger, MI, Indians, Michigan. Alpena, MI, Antrim, MI, Benzie, MI, Charlevoix, MI, Cheboygan, MI, Chippewa, MI, Crawford, MI, Delta, MI, Emmet, MI, Grand Traverse, MI, Iosco, MI, Kalkaska, MI, Leelanau, MI, Luce, MI, Mackinac, MI, Manistee, MI, Missaukee, MI, Montmorency, MI, Ogemaw, MI, Oscoda, MI, Otsego, MI, Presque Isle, MI, Schoolcraft, MI, Roscommon, MI, Wexford, MI. Lower Brule Sioux Tribe of the Lower Brule, SD, Buffalo, SD, Hughes, Brule Reservation, South Dakota. SD, Lyman, SD, Stanley, SD. Lower Elwha Tribal Community........... Clallam, WA. Lower Sioux Indian Community in the Redwood, MN, Renville, MN. State of Minnesota. Lummi Tribe of the Lummi Reservation... Whatcom, WA. Makah Indian Tribe of the Makah Indian Clallam, WA. Reservation. Mashantucket Pequot Tribe.............. New London, CT.\26\ Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe................ Barnstable, MA, Bristol, MA, Norfolk, MA, Plymouth, MA, Suffolk, MA.\27\ Match-e-be-nash-she-wish Band of Allegan, MI,\28\ Barry, MI, Pottawatomi Indians of Michigan. Kalamazoo, MI, Kent, MI, Ottawa, MI. Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin.... Langlade, WI, Menominee, WI, Oconto, WI, Shawano, WI. Mescalero Apache Tribe of the Mescalero Chaves, NM, Lincoln, NM, Otero, Reservation, New Mexico. NM. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians............ Broward, FL, Collier, FL, Miami- Dade, FL, Hendry, FL. Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota Itasca, MN, Koochiching, MN, Bois Forte Band (Nett Lake). St. Louis, MN. Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota Carlton, MN, St. Louis, MN. Fond du Lac Band. Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota Cook, MN. Grand Portage Band. Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota Beltrami, MN, Cass, MN, Leech Lake Band. Hubbard, MN, Itasca, MN. Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota Aitkin, MN, Kanebec, MN, Mille Mille Lacs Band. Lacs, MN, Pine, MN. Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota Becker, MN, Clearwater, MN, White Earth Band. Mahnomen, MN, Norman, MN, Polk, MN. Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians.... Attala, MS, Jasper, MS,\29\ Jones, MS, Kemper, MS, Leake, MS, Neshoba, MS, Newton, MS, Noxubee, MS,\29\ Scott, MS,\30\ Winston, MS. Mohegan Tribe of Indians of Connecticut Fairfield, CT, Hartford, CT, Litchfield, CT, Middlesex, CT, New Haven, CT, New London, CT, Tolland, CT, Windham, CT. Muckleshoot Indian Tribe............... King, WA, Pierce, WA. Narragansett Indian Tribe.............. Washington, RI.\31\ Navajo Nation, Arizona, New Mexico & Apache, AZ, Bernalillo, NM, Utah. Cibola, NM, Coconino, AZ, Kane, UT, McKinley, NM, Montezuma, CO, Navajo, AZ, Rio Arriba, NM, Sandoval, NM, San Juan, NM, San Juan, UT, Socorro, NM, Valencia, NM. Nevada................................. Entire State.\32\ Nez Perce Tribe........................ Clearwater, ID, Idaho, ID, Latah, ID, Lewis, ID, Nez Perce, ID. Nisqually Indian Tribe................. Pierce, WA, Thurston, WA. Nooksack Indian Tribe.................. Whatcom, WA. Northern Cheyenne Tribe of the Northern Big Horn, MT, Carter, MT,\33\ Cheyenne Indian Reservation, Montana. Rosebud, MT. Northwestern Band of Shoshoni Nation... Box Elder, UT.\34\ Nottawaseppi Huron Band of the Allegan, MI,\35\ Barry, MI, Potawatomi, Michigan. Branch, MI, Calhoun, MI, Kalamazoo, MI, Kent, MI, Ottawa, MI. Oglala Sioux Tribe..................... Bennett, SD, Cherry, NE, Custer, SD, Dawes, NE, Fall River, SD, Jackson, SD,\36\ Mellete, SD, Pennington, SD, Shannon, SD, Sheridan, NE, Todd, SD. [[Page 51285]] Ohkay Owingeh, New Mexico.............. Rio Arriba, NM. Oklahoma............................... Entire State.\37\ Omaha Tribe of Nebraska................ Burt, NE, Cuming, NE, Monona, IA, Thurston, NE, Wayne, NE. Oneida Nation of New York.............. Chenango, NY, Cortland, NY, Herkimer, NY, Madison, NY, Oneida, NY, Onondaga, NY. Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin... Brown, WI, Outagamie, WI. Onondaga Nation........................ Onondaga, NY. Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah............ Iron, UT,\38\ Millard, UT, Sevier, UT, Washington, UT. Pascua Yaqui Tribe of Arizona.......... Pima, AZ.\39\ Passamaquoddy Tribe.................... Aroostook, ME,40 41 Washington, ME. Penobscot Nation....................... Aroostook, ME,\40\ Penobscot, ME. Poarch Band of Creeks.................. Baldwin, AL,\42\ Elmore, AL, Escambia, AL, Mobile, AL, Monroe, AL, Escambia, FL. Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians, Allegan, MI,\43\ Berrien, MI, Michigan and Indiana. Cass, MI, Elkhart, IN, Kosciusko, IN, La Porte, IN, Marshall, IN, St. Joseph, IN, Starke, IN, Van Buren, MI. Ponca Tribe of Nebraska................ Boyd, NE,\44\ Burt, NE, Charles Mix, SD, Douglas, NE, Hall, NE, Holt, NE, Knox, NE, Lancaster, NE, Madison, NE, Platte, NE, Pottawattomie, IA, Sarpy, NE, Stanton, NE, Wayne, NE, Woodbury, IA. Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe............ Kitsap, WA. Prairie Band of Potawatomi Nation...... Jackson, KS. Prairie Island Indian Community in the Goodhue, MN. State of Minnesota. Pueblo of Acoma, New Mexico............ Cibola, NM. Pueblo of Cochiti, New Mexico.......... Sandoval, NM, Santa Fe, NM. Pueblo of Isleta, New Mexico........... Bernalillo, NM, Torrance, NM, Valencia, NM. Pueblo of Jemez, New Mexico............ Sandoval, NM. Pueblo of Laguna, New Mexico........... Bernalillo, NM, Cibola, NM, Sandoval, NM, Valencia, NM. Pueblo of Nambe, New Mexico............ Santa Fe, NM. Pueblo of Picuris, New Mexico.......... Taos, NM. Pueblo of Pojoaque, New Mexico......... Rio Arriba, NM, Santa Fe, NM. Pueblo of San Felipe, New Mexico....... Sandoval, NM. Pueblo of San Ildefonso, New Mexico.... Los Alamos, NM, Rio Arriba, NM, Sandoval, NM, Santa Fe, NM. Pueblo of Sandia, New Mexico........... Bernalillo, NM, Sandoval, NM. Pueblo of Santa Ana, New Mexico........ Sandoval, NM. Pueblo of Santa Clara, New Mexico...... Los Alamos, NM, Sandoval, NM, Santa Fe, NM. Pueblo of Taos, New Mexico............. Colfax, NM, Taos, NM. Pueblo of Tesuque, New Mexico.......... Santa Fe, NM. Pueblo of Zia, New Mexico.............. Sandoval, NM. Puyallup Tribe of the Puyallup King, WA, Pierce, WA, Thurston, Reservation. WA. Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Indian Yuma, AZ, Imperial, CA. Reservation, California and Arizona. Quileute Tribe of the Quileute Clallam, WA, Jefferson, WA. Reservation. Quinault Indian Nation................. Grays Harbor, WA, Jefferson, WA. Rapid City, South Dakota............... Pennington, SD.\45\ Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Bayfield, WI. Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin. Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians, Beltrami, MN, Clearwater, MN, Minnesota. Koochiching, MN, Lake of the Woods, MN, Marshall, MN, Pennington, MN, Polk, MN, Roseau, MN. Rosebud Sioux Tribe of the Rosebud Bennett, SD, Cherry, NE, Indian Reservation, South Dakota. Gregory, SD, Lyman, SD, Mellette, SD, Todd, SD, Tripp, SD. Sac & Fox Nation of Missouri in Kansas Brown, KS, Richardson, NE. and Nebraska. Sac & Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Tama, IA. Iowa. Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Arenac, MI,\46\ Clare, MI, Michigan. Isabella, MI, Midland, MI, Missaukee, MI. Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe............... Franklin, NY, St. Lawrence, NY. Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Maricopa, AZ. Community of the Salt River Reservation, Arizona. Samish Indian Nation................... Clallam, WA,\47\ Island, WA, Jefferson, WA, King, WA, Kitsap, WA, Pierce, WA, San Juan, WA, Skagit, WA, Snohomish, WA, Whatcom, WA. San Carlos Apache Tribe of the San Apache, AZ, Cochise, AZ, Gila, Carlos Reservation, Arizona. AZ, Graham, AZ, Greenlee, AZ, Pinal, AZ. San Juan Southern Paiute Tribe of Coconino, AZ, San Juan, UT. Arizona. Santee Sioux Nation, Nebraska.......... Bon Homme, SD, Knox, NE. Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe............. Snohomish, WA, Skagit, WA. Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Alger, MI,\48\ Chippewa, MI, Indians, Michigan. Delta, MI, Luce, MI, Mackinac, MI, Marquette, MI, Schoolcraft, MI. Seminole Tribe of Florida.............. Broward, FL, Collier, FL, Miami- Dade, FL, Glades, FL, Hendry, FL. Seneca Nation of Indians............... Allegany, NY, Cattaraugus, NY, Chautauqua, NY, Erie, NY, Warren, PA. Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community of Scott, MN. Minnesota. Shinnecock Indian Nation............... Nassau, NY,\49\ Suffolk, NY. Shoalwater Bay Tribe of the Shoalwater Pacific, WA. Bay Indian Reservation. Shoshone Tribe of the Wind River Hot Springs, WY, Fremont, WY, Reservation, Wyoming. Sublette, WY. [[Page 51286]] Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Bannock, ID, Bingham, ID, Hall Reservation. Caribou, ID, Lemhi, ID,\50\ Power, ID. Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of the Duck Nevada, Owyhee, ID. Valley Reservation, Nevada. Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate of the Lake Codington, SD, Day, SD, Grant, Traverse Reservation, South Dakota. SD, Marshall, SD, Richland, ND, Roberts, SD, Sargent, ND, Traverse, MN. Skokomish Indian Tribe................. Mason, WA. Skull Valley Band of Goshute Indians of Tooele, UT. Utah. Snoqualmie Indian Tribe................ King, WA,\51\ Snohomish, WA, Pierce, WA, Island, WA, Mason, WA. Sokaogon Chippewa Community, Wisconsin. Forest, WI. Southern Ute Indian Tribe of the Archuleta, CO, La Plata, CO, Southern Ute Reservation, Colorado. Montezuma, CO, Rio Arriba, NM, San Juan, NM. Spirit Lake Tribe, North Dakota........ Benson, ND, Eddy, ND, Nelson, ND, Ramsey, ND. Spokane Tribe of the Spokane Ferry, WA, Lincoln, WA, Reservation. Stevens, WA. Squaxin Island Tribe of the Squaxin Mason, WA. Island Reservation. St. Croix Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin Barron, WI, Burnett, WI, Pine, MN, Polk, WI, Washburn, WI. Standing Rock Sioux Tribe of North & Adams, ND, Campbell, SD, South Dakota. Corson, SD, Dewey, SD, Emmons, ND, Grant, ND, Morton, ND, Perkins, SD, Sioux, ND, Walworth, SD, Ziebach, SD. Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians of Snohomish, WA. Washington. Stockbridge Munsee Community, Wisconsin Menominee, WI, Shawano, WI. Suquamish Indian Tribe of the Port Kitsap, WA. Madison Reservation. Swinomish Indian Tribal Community...... Skagit, WA. Tejon Indian Tribe..................... Kern, CA.\52\ Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Dunn, ND, Mercer, ND, McKenzie, Berthold Reservation, North Dakota. ND, McLean, ND, Mountrail, ND, Ward, ND. Tohono O'odham Nation of Arizona....... Maricopa, AZ, Pima, AZ, Pinal, AZ. Tonawanda Band of Seneca............... Genesee, NY, Erie, NY, Niagara, NY. Tonto Apache Tribe of Arizona.......... Gila, AZ. Trenton Service Unit, North Dakota and Divide, ND,\53\ McKenzie, ND, Montana. Williams, ND, Richland, MT, Roosevelt, MT, Sheridan, MT. Tulalip Tribes of Washington........... Snohomish, WA. Tunica-Biloxi Indian Tribe............. Avoyelles, LA, Rapides, LA.\54\ Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Rolette, ND. Indians of North Dakota. Tuscarora Nation....................... Niagara, NY. Upper Sioux Community, Minnesota....... Chippewa, MN, Yellow Medicine, MN. Upper Skagit Indian Tribe.............. Skagit, WA. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah & Ouray Carbon, UT, Daggett, UT, Reservation, Utah. Duchesne, UT, Emery, UT, Grand, UT, Rio Blanco, CO, Summit, UT, Uintah, UT, Utah, UT, Wasatch, UT. Ute Mountain Tribe of the Ute Mountain Apache, AZ, La Plata, CO, Reservation, Colorado, New Mexico & Montezuma, CO, San Juan, NM, Utah. San Juan, UT. Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah). Dukes, MA,\55\ Barnstable, MA, Bristol, MA, Norfolk, MA, Plymouth, MA, Suffolk, MA.\56\ Washoe Tribe of Nevada & California.... Nevada, California except for the counties listed in footnote. White Mountain Apache Tribe of the Fort Apache, AZ, Coconino, AZ, Gila, Apache Reservation, Arizona. AZ, Graham, AZ, Greenlee, AZ, Navajo, AZ. Wilton Rancheria, California........... Sacramento, CA.\57\ Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska............ Dakota, NE, Dixon, NE, Monona, IA, Thurston, NE, Wayne, NE, Woodbury, IA. Yankton Sioux Tribe of South Dakota.... Bon Homme, SD, Boyd, NE, Charles Mix, SD, Douglas, SD, Gregory, SD, Hutchinson, SD, Knox, NE. Yavapai-Apache Nation of the Camp Verde Yavapai, AZ. Indian Reservation, Arizona. Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe.......... Yavapai, AZ. Ysleta Del Sur Pueblo of Texas......... El Paso, TX.\1\ Zuni Tribe of the Zuni Reservation, New Apache, AZ, Cibola, NM, Mexico. McKinley, NM, Valencia, NM. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ \1\ Public Law 100-89, Restoration Act for Ysleta Del Sur and Alabama and Coushatta Tribes of Texas establishes service areas for ``members of the Tribe'' by sections 101(3) and 105(a) for the Pueblo and sections 201(3) and 206(a) respectively. \2\ Entire State of Alaska is included as a CHSDA by regulation (42 CFR 136.22(a)(1)). \3\ Aroostook Band of Micmacs was recognized by Congress on November 26, 1991, through the Aroostook Band of Micmac Settlement Act. Aroostook County, ME, was defined as the SDA. \4\ Special programs have been established by Congress irrespective of the eligibility regulations. Eligibility for services at these facilities is based on the legislative history of the appropriation of funds for the particular facility rather than the eligibility regulations. Historically services have been provided at Brigham City Intermountain School Health Center, Utah (Pub. L. 88-358). \5\ Entire State of California, excluding the counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, Los Angeles, Marin, Orange, Sacramento, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Kern, Merced, Monterey, Napa, San Benito, San Joaquin, San Luis Obispo, Santa Cruz, Solano, Stanislaus, and Ventura, is designated a CHSDA (25 U.S.C. 1680). \6\ The counties were recognized after the January 1984 CHSDA FRN was published, in accordance with P.L. 103-116, Catawba Indian Tribe of South Carolina Land Claims Settlement Act of 1993, dated October 27, 1993. \7\ There is no reservation for the Cayuga Nation; the service delivery area consists of those counties identified by the Cayuga Nation. \8\ Skamania County, WA, has historically been a part of the Yakama Service Unit population since 1979. \9\ In order to carry out the Congressional intent of the Siletz Restoration Act, Pub. L. 95-195, as expressed in H. Report No. 95-623, at page 4, members of the Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians of Oregon residing in these counties are eligible for contract health services. \10\ Chelan County, WA, has historically been a part of the Colville Service Unit population since 1970. \11\ Pursuant to Pub. L. 98-481 (H. Rept. No. 98-904), Coos, Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw Restoration Act, members of the Tribe residing in these counties were specified as eligible for Federal services and benefits without regard to the existence of a Federal Indian reservation. [[Page 51287]] \12\ The Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Community of Oregon were recognized by Pub. L. 98-165 which was signed into law on November 22, 1983, and provides for eligibility in these six counties without regard to the existence of a reservation. \13\ The CHSDA for the Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana was expanded administratively by the Director, IHS, through regulation (42 CFR 136.22(6)) to include city limits of Elton, LA. \14\ Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians recognized by Pub. L. 97- 391, signed into law on December 29, 1983. House Rept. No. 97-862 designates Douglas, Jackson, and Josephine Counties as a service area without regard to the existence of a reservation. The IHS later administratively expanded the CHSDA to include the counties of Coos, OR, Deshutes, OR, Klamath, OR, and Lane, OR. \15\ The Cowlitz Indian Tribe was recognized in July 2002 as documented at 67 FR 46329, July 12, 2002. The counties listed were designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Pub. L. 93-638. The CHSDA was administratively expanded to included Columbia County, OR, Kittitas, WA, and Wahkiakum County, WA, as published at 67884 FR December 21, 2009. \16\ Treasure County, MT, has historically been a part of the Crow Service Unit population. \17\ The counties listed have historically been a part of the Grand Traverse Service Unit population since 1980. \18\ Haskell Indian Health Center has historically been a part of Kansas Service Unit since 1979. Special programs have been established by Congress irrespective of the eligibility regulations. Eligibility for services at these facilities is based on the legislative history of the appropriation of funds for the particular facility rather than the eligibility regulations. Historically services have been provided at Haskell Indian Health Center (H. Rept. No. 95-392). \19\ CHSDA counties for the Ho-Chunk Nation of Wisconsin were designated by regulation (42 CFR 136.22(a)(5)). Dane County, WI, was added to the reservation by the Bureau of Indian Affairs in 1986. \20\ Public Law 97-428 provides that any member of the Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians in or around the Town of Houlton shall be eligible without regard to existence of a reservation. \21\ The Jena Band of Choctaw Indian was Federally acknowledged as documented at 60 FR 28480, May 31, 1995. The counties listed were designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Pub. L. 93-638. \22\ Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas, formerly known as the Texas Band of Kickapoo, was recognized by Pub. L. 97-429, signed into law on January 8, 1983. The Act provides for eligibility for Kickapoo Tribal members residing in Maverick County without regard to the existence of a reservation. \23\ The Klamath Indian Tribe Restoration Act (Pub. L. 99-398, Sec. 2(2)) states that for the purpose of Federal services and benefits ``members of the tribe residing in Klamath County shall be deemed to be residing in or near a reservation''. \24\ The Koi Nation of Northern California, formerly known as the Lower Lake Rancheria, was reaffirmed by the Secretary of the Bureau of Indian Affairs on December 29, 2000. The counties listed were designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a PRC SDA, for the purposes of operating a PRC program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Pub. L. 93-638. \25\ The Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians and the Little River Band of Ottawa Indians Act recognized the Little River Band of Ottawa Indians and the Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians. Pursuant to Pub. L. 103-324, Sec. 4(b) the counties listed were designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Pub. L. 93-638. \26\ Mashantucket Pequot Indian Claims Settlement Act, Pub. L. 98-134, signed into law on October 18, 1983, provides a reservation for the Mashantucket Pequot Indian Tribe in New London County, CT. \27\ The Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe was recognized in February 2007, as documented at 72 FR 8007, February 22, 2007. The counties listed were designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Pub. L. 93-638. \28\ The Match-e-be-nash-she-wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians of Michigan was recognized in October 1998, as documented at 63 FR 56936, October 23, 1998. The counties listed were designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Pub. L. 93-638. \29 \Members of the Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians residing in Jasper and Noxubee Counties, MS, are eligible for contract health services; these two counties were inadvertently omitted from 42 CFR 136.22. \30 \Scott County, MS, has historically been a part of the Choctaw Service Unit population since 1970. \31\ The Narragansett Indian Tribe was recognized by Pub. L. 95-395, signed into law September 30, 1978. Lands in Washington County, RI, are now Federally restricted and the Bureau of Indian Affairs considers them as the Narragansett Indian Reservation. \32\ Entire State of Nevada is included as a CHSDA by regulation (42 CFR 136.22 (a)(2)). \33\ Carter County, MT, has historically been a part of the Northern Cheyenne Service Unit population since 1979. \34\ Land of Box Elder County, Utah, was taken into trust for the Northwestern Band of Shoshoni Nation in 1986. \35\ The Nottawaseppi Huron Band of the Potawatomi, Michigan, formerly known as the Huron Band of Potawatomi, Inc., was recognized in December 1995, as documented at 60 FR 66315, December 21, 1995. The counties listed were designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Pub. L. 93-638. \36\ Washabaugh County, SD, merged and became part of Jackson County, SD, in 1983; both were/are CHSDA counties for the Oglala Sioux Tribe. \37\ Entire State of Oklahoma is included as a CHSDA by regulation (42 CFR 136.22 (a)(3)). \38 \Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah Restoration Act, Pub. L. 96-227, provides for the extension of services for the Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah to these four counties without regard to the existence of a reservation. \39\ Legislative history (H.R. Report No. 95-1021) to Pub. L. 95-375, Extension of Federal Benefits to Pascua Yaqui Indians, Arizona, expresses congressional intent that lands conveyed to the Pascua Yaqui Tribe of Arizona pursuant to Act of October 8, 1964. (Pub. L. 88-350) shall be deemed a Federal Indian Reservation. \40\ The Maine Indian Claims Settlement Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-420; H. Rept. 96-1353) includes the intent of Congress to fund and provide contract health services to the Passamaquoddy Tribe and the Penobscot Nation. \41\ The Passamaquoddy Tribe has two reservations. The PRC SDA for the Passamaquoddy Tribe of Indian Township, ME, is Aroostook County, ME, and Washington County, ME. The PRC SDA for the Passamaquoddy Tribe of Pleasant Point, ME, is Washington County, ME, south of State Route. \42\ Counties in the Service Unit designated by Congress for the Poarch Band of Creek Indians (see H. Rept. 98-886, June 29, 1984; Cong. Record, October 10, 1984, Pg. H11929). \43\ Pub. L. 103-323 restored Federal recognition to the Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians, Michigan and Indiana, in 1994 and identified counties to serve as the SDA. \44\ The Ponca Restoration Act, Pub. L. 101-484, recognized members of the Ponca Tribe of Nebraska in Boyd, Douglas, Knox, Madison or Lancaster counties of Nebraska or Charles Mix county of South Dakota as residing on or near a reservation. Pub. L. 104-109 made technical corrections to laws relating to Native Americans and added Burt, Hall, Holt, Platte, Sarpy, Stanton, and Wayne counties of Nebraska and Pottawatomie and Woodbury counties of Iowa to the Ponca Tribe of Nebraska SDA. \45\ Special programs have been established by Congress irrespective of the eligibility regulations. Eligibility for services at these facilities is based on the legislative history of the appropriation of funds for the particular facility, rather than the eligibility regulations. Historically services have been provided at Rapid City (S. Rept. No. 1154, FY 1967 Interior Approp. 89th Cong. 2d Sess.). \46\ Historically part of Isabella Reservation Area for the Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan and the Eastern Michigan Service Unit population since 1979. \47\ The Samish Indian Tribe Nation was Federally acknowledged in April 1996 as documented at 61 FR 15825, April 9, 1996. The counties listed were designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Pub. L. 93-638. \48\ CHSDA counties for the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians, Michigan, were designated by regulation (42 CFR 136.22(a)(4)). [[Page 51288]] \49\ The Shinnecock Indian Nation was Federally acknowledged in June 2010 as documented at 75 FR 34760, June 18, 2010. The counties listed were designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Pub. L. 93-638. \50\ Lemhi County, ID, has historically been a part of the Fort Hall Service Unit population since 1979. \51\ The Snoqualmie Indian Tribe was Federally acknowledged in August 1997 as documented at 62 FR 45864, August 29, 1997. The counties listed were designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Pub. L. 93-638. \52\ On December 30, 2011 the Office of Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs reaffirmed the Federal recognition of the Tejon Indian Tribe. The county listed was designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Pub. L. 93-638. \53\ The Secretary acting through the Service is directed to provide contract health services to Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians that reside in Trenton Service Unit, North Dakota and Montana, in Divide, Mackenzie, and Williams counties in the state of North Dakota and the adjoining counties of Richland, Roosevelt, and Sheridan in the state of Montana (Sec. 815, Pub. L. 94-437). \54\ Rapides County, LA, has historically been a part of the Tunica Biloxi Service Unit population since 1982. \55\ According to Pub. L. 100-95, Sec. 12, members of the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) residing on Martha's Vineyard are deemed to be living on or near an Indian reservation for the purposes of eligibility for Federal services. \56\ The counties listed are designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a PRC SDA, for the purposes of operating a PRC program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Pub. L. 93-638. \57\ The Wilton Rancheria, California had Federal recognition restored in July 2009 as documented at 74 FR 33468, July 13, 2009. Sacramento County, CA, was designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA. Sacramento County was not covered when Congress originally established the State of California as a CHSDA excluding certain counties including Sacramento County (25 U.S.C. 1680). Dated: August 17, 2015. Robert G. McSwain, Deputy Director, Indian Health Service. [FR Doc. 2015-20781 Filed 8-21-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 163 / Monday, August 24, 2015 / Notices 51281
and represent a resource of more than contact information (regular and Technical Assistance Assessment at
205,000 volunteers. In order to continue emergency), volunteer numbers, and least annually. The MRC unit data
supporting the MRC units in information about activities is needed collected has expanded to include a
communities across the United States, by the Division of Civilian Volunteer self-assessment tool for use by unit
and to continue planning for future Medical Reserve Corps (DCVMRC). MRC leaders to aid in developing their MRC
emergencies that are national in scope, Unit Leaders are asked to update this unit. This OMB revision request is for
detailed information about the MRC information on the MRC Web site at 3 years.
units, including unit demographics, least quarterly, and to participate in a
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN TABLE
Number of Average
Type of Number of Total burden
Collection tool responses per burden hours
respondent respondents hours
respondent per response
Unit Profile ........................................ MRC Unit Leader ............................. 1,000 4 30/60 2,000
TA Assessment ................................. MRC Unit Leader ............................. 1,000 1 1 1,000
Factors for Success .......................... MRC Unit Leader ............................. 1,000 4 30/60 2,000
Unit Activity Reporting ...................... MRC Unit Leader ............................. 1,000 4 15/60 1,000
Total ........................................... ........................................................... ........................ ........................ ........................ 6,000
Terry S. Clark, 1. Electronically. You may submit codified at 42 CFR part 136, subparts A
Asst Information Collection Clearance electronic comments on this regulation through C. Subpart C defines a Contract
Officer. to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow Health Service Delivery Area (CHSDA),
[FR Doc. 2015–20848 Filed 8–21–15; 8:45 am] the ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ instructions. now known as a Purchased/Referred
BILLING CODE 4150–47–P 2. By regular mail. You may mail Care (PRC) Service Delivery Area, as the
written comments to the following geographic area within which PRC will
address ONLY: Betty Gould, Regulations be made available by the IHS to
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND Officer, Indian Health Service, 801 members of an identified Indian
HUMAN SERVICES Thompson Avenue, TMP STE 450, community who reside in the area.
Rockville, Maryland 20852. Residence in a PRC service delivery area
Indian Health Service Please allow sufficient time for mailed by a person who is within the scope of
comments to be received before the the Indian health program, as set forth
Notice To Propose the Redesignation close of the comment period. in 42 CFR 136.12, creates no legal
of the Service Delivery Area for the 3. By express or overnight mail. You entitlement to PRC but only potential
Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head may send written comments to the eligibility for services. Services needed
(Aquinnah) above address. but not available at an IHS/Tribal
4. By hand or courier. If you prefer, facility are provided under the PRC
AGENCY: Indian Health Service, HHS. you may deliver (by hand or courier) program depending on the availability
ACTION: Notice. your written comments before the close of funds, the person’s relative medical
of the comment period to the address priority, and the actual availability and
SUMMARY: This notice advises the public above. If you intend to deliver your
that the Indian Health Service (IHS) accessibility of alternate resources in
comments to the Rockville address, accordance with the regulations.
proposes to expand the geographic please call telephone number (301) 443–
boundaries of the Service Delivery Area As applicable to the Tribes, these
1116 in advance to schedule your regulations provide that, unless
for the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head arrival with a staff member.
(Aquinnah) of Massachusetts. The otherwise designated, a PRC service
Comments will be made available for delivery area shall consist of a county
Aquinnah service delivery area is public inspection at the Rockville
currently comprised of members of the which includes all or part of a
address from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., reservation and any county or counties
Tribe residing in Martha’s Vineyard, Monday–Friday, two weeks after
Dukes County in the State of which have a common boundary with
publication of this notice. the reservation. (42 CFR 136.22(a)(6)
Massachusetts. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl
The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) (2014)). The regulations also provide
Harper, Director, Office of Resource that after consultation with the Tribal
recognized the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Access and Partnerships, Indian Health
Head on February 10, 1987. Martha’s governing body or bodies on those
Service, 801 Thompson Avenue, Suite reservations included within the PRC
Vineyard, Dukes County was designated 360, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
as the Aquinnah service delivery area in service delivery area, the Secretary may
Telephone 301/443–2694 (This is not a from time to time, redesignate areas
the Wampanoag Tribal Council of Gay toll free number).
Head, Inc., Indian Claims Settlement within the United States for inclusion in
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Inspection or exclusion from a PRC service delivery
Act of 1987, Public Law 100–95.
of Public Comments: All comments area. The regulations require that certain
DATES: Comments must be submitted received before the close of the criteria must be considered before any
September 23, 2015.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
comment period are available for redesignation is made. The criteria are
ADDRESSES: Because of staff and viewing by the public, including any as follows:
resource limitations, we cannot accept personally identifiable or confidential (1) The number of Indians residing in
comments by facsimile (FAX) business information that is included in the area proposed to be so included or
transmission. You may submit a comment. excluded;
comments in one of four ways (please Background: The IHS currently (2) Whether the Tribal governing body
choose only one of the ways listed): provides services under regulations has determined that Indians residing in
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:48 Aug 21, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24AUN1.SGM 24AUN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_51444/page/1.svg)
![51282 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 163 / Monday, August 24, 2015 / Notices
the area near the reservation are socially letter to the Tribe, IHS declined Aquinnah provides limited direct
and economically affiliated with the Aquinnah’s proposal to serve non- services to its Tribal members by
Tribes; resident members residing outside of operating a small clinic in Dukes
(3) The geographic proximity to the Dukes County, Massachusetts, through County that is open once or twice a
reservation of the area whose inclusion its PRC program. At the insistence of the month. To access direct care services,
or exclusion is being considered; and Tribe, IHS has reevaluated the Agency’s non-residents must travel over one and
(4) The level of funding which would position. a half hours via ferry and car to receive
be available for the provision of PRC. While IHS does not intend to abandon the health care offered at the clinic. As
Additionally, the regulations require its historic practice, IHS has reviewed a consequence, most non-residents do
that any redesignation of a PRC service the Aquinnah’s request and believes not seek care on the island.
delivery area must be made in that unique circumstances are present Accordingly, the purpose of this
accordance with the Administrative that warrant expanding the Aquinnah Federal Register notice is to notify the
Procedures Act (5 U.S.C. 553). In PRC service delivery area beyond the public of the proposal to expand the
compliance with this requirement, we limits identified by Congress in Public Aquinnah service delivery area to
are publishing this proposal and Law 100–95. These unique include Barnstable, Bristol, Norfolk,
requesting public comments. circumstances include the factors
The Tribe’s PRC Service Delivery Plymouth and Suffolk Counties in the
identified by the BIA in recognizing the State of Massachusetts. The proposed
Area is currently defined, both
Aquinnah prior to the enactment of notice will expand their current service
administratively and statutorily, as
Public Law 100–95, IHS’s prior decision delivery area which incorporates
consisting only of Martha’s Vineyard,
to provide sanitation services to Martha’s Vineyard, Dukes County in the
Dukes County. The Wampanoag Tribal
Aquinnah members residing on the State of Massachusetts to include
Council of Gay Head, Inc., Indian
mainland outside of the existing PRC Barnstable, Bristol, Norfolk, Plymouth
Claims Settlement Act of 1987 provides,
service delivery area, Dukes County’s and Suffolk Counties in the State of
among other items, that ‘‘[f]or the
purpose of eligibility for Federal status as an island and the significant Massachusetts.
services made available to members of number of Tribal members that reside Under 42 CFR 136.23 those otherwise
federally recognized Indian tribes, permanently off of the island but eligible Indians who do not reside on a
because of their status as Indians, continue to maintain close economic reservation but reside within a PRC
members of this tribe residing on and social ties with the Aquinnah. The service delivery area must be either
Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts, shall BIA recognized the Aquinnah Tribe as members of the Tribe or maintain close
be deemed to be living on or near an an Indian Tribe eligible for Federal economic and social ties with the Tribe.
Indian reservation.’’ 25 U.S.C. .l771i; see benefits on February 10, 1987, pursuant In this case, in applying the
also 75 FR 20608 (Apr. 20, 2010). to a notice published in the Federal aforementioned PRC service delivery
Because the statute defines which Register. See 52 FR 4193. As part of its area redesignation criteria required by
members of the Tribe live ‘‘on or near findings, BIA concluded ‘‘that the operative regulations (43 FR 34654), the
[the] reservation’’ for purposes of all [Aquinnah] have an extensive and following findings are made:
Federal services for which that interrelated communication network
1. By expanding, the Tribe estimates
consideration is relevant, this eligibility connecting those Wampanoag members
the current eligible population will be
definition applies to PRC. IHS adopted in Gay Head and elsewhere on Martha’s
increased by 268.
the Congressionally-defined service Vineyard with each other and with
those members living off-island.’’ The 2. The Tribe has determined that
delivery area for the purposes of these 268 individuals are socially and
administering benefits under the IHS BIA further concluded that the Tribal
government ‘‘maintained political economically affiliated with the Tribe.
PRC program via an IHS Director
Decision memo on October 14, 1987. influence and/or authority over both its 3. The expanded area including
Thus, members of the Tribe who reside resident and non-resident members.’’ Barnstable, Bristol, Norfolk, Plymouth,
outside of Martha’s Vineyard, Dukes In 1997, IHS authorized sanitation and Suffolk Counties in the State of
County do not reside within the services to non-resident members of the Massachusetts are across the Bay from
Aquinnah’s PRC service delivery area Aquinnah Tribe residing in the counties Martha’s Vineyard, Dukes County,
and are currently not eligible for PRC of Barnstable, Bristol, Norfolk, Massachusetts.
from the Aquinnah. Plymouth and Dukes Counties in the 4. Generally, the Tribal members
Historically, IHS has established and State of Massachusetts, specifically located in these counties currently do
maintained service delivery areas in finding that the service area for not use the Indian health system for
accordance with Congressional intent, sanitation facilities construction was not their health care needs. The Tribe will
as evidenced by geographically limited to the Tribal health program use its existing Federal allocation for
designated areas identified in service area (Dukes County). PRC funds to provide services to the
recognition or settlement acts, such as Finally, Aquinnah has a significant expanded population. No additional
Public Law 100–95. Indeed, IHS has number of members who are not financial resources will be allocated by
said that with respect to the Aquinnah residents of Dukes County. According to IHS to the Tribe to provide services to
Tribe, the Secretary’s discretion to Tribal estimates, 268 enrolled Aquinnah Tribal members residing in these
redesignate the Tribe’s PRC service members are non-residents who remain counties nor should this expansion be
delivery area is superseded by the actively involved with the Tribe, reside construed to have any present or future
geographic limitation in the Tribe’s in Barnstable, Bristol, Norfolk, effect on the allocation of resources
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Settlement Act of 1987, and Plymouth and Suffolk Counties and are between Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe
accordingly, in a December 2, 2011 not currently eligible for PRC care. and Aquinnah.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:48 Aug 21, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00087 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24AUN1.SGM 24AUN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_51444/page/2.svg)
![51288 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 163 / Monday, August 24, 2015 / Notices
49 The Shinnecock Indian Nation was Federally acknowledged in June 2010 as documented at 75 FR 34760, June 18, 2010. The counties list-
ed were designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the
ISDEAA, Pub. L. 93–638.
50 Lemhi County, ID, has historically been a part of the Fort Hall Service Unit population since 1979.
51 The Snoqualmie Indian Tribe was Federally acknowledged in August 1997 as documented at 62 FR 45864, August 29, 1997. The counties
listed were designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the
ISDEAA, Pub. L. 93–638.
52 On December 30, 2011 the Office of Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs reaffirmed the Federal recognition of the Tejon Indian Tribe. The
county listed was designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the
ISDEAA, Pub. L. 93–638.
53 The Secretary acting through the Service is directed to provide contract health services to Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians that
reside in Trenton Service Unit, North Dakota and Montana, in Divide, Mackenzie, and Williams counties in the state of North Dakota and the ad-
joining counties of Richland, Roosevelt, and Sheridan in the state of Montana (Sec. 815, Pub. L. 94–437).
54 Rapides County, LA, has historically been a part of the Tunica Biloxi Service Unit population since 1982.
55 According to Pub. L. 100–95, Sec. 12, members of the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) residing on Martha’s Vineyard are
deemed to be living on or near an Indian reservation for the purposes of eligibility for Federal services.
56 The counties listed are designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a PRC SDA, for the purposes of operating a PRC program
pursuant to the ISDEAA, Pub. L. 93–638.
57 The Wilton Rancheria, California had Federal recognition restored in July 2009 as documented at 74 FR 33468, July 13, 2009. Sacramento
County, CA, was designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA. Sacramento County was not covered when Congress origi-
nally established the State of California as a CHSDA excluding certain counties including Sacramento County (25 U.S.C. 1680).
Dated: August 17, 2015. Integrated Review Group; Neurobiology of DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
Robert G. McSwain, Motivated Behavior Study Section. HUMAN SERVICES
Deputy Director, Indian Health Service. Date: October 1, 2015.
[FR Doc. 2015–20781 Filed 8–21–15; 8:45 am] Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. National Institutes of Health
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
BILLING CODE P
applications. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National
Place: Melrose Hotel, 2430 Pennsylvania Institute of Child Health and Human
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20037. Development; Notice of Closed
HUMAN SERVICES Contact Person: Nicholas Gaiano, Ph.D., Meeting
Scientific Review Officer, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of Pursuant to section 10(d) of the
National Institutes of Health
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5178, Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
Center for Scientific Review; Notice of MSC 7844, Bethesda, MD 20892–7844, 301– amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is
Closed Meetings 435–1033, gaianonr@csr.nih.gov. hereby given of the following meeting.
Name of Committee: Integrative, The meeting will be closed to the
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the public in accordance with the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as Functional and Cognitive Neuroscience
Integrated Review Group; Neurotoxicology provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(4)
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as
and Alcohol Study Section.
hereby given of the following meetings. amended. The grant applications and
The meetings will be closed to the Date: October 5, 2015.
Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. the discussions could disclose
public in accordance with the confidential trade secrets or commercial
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
provisions set forth in sections property such as patentable material,
applications.
552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., and personal information concerning
Place: Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase
as amended. The grant applications and individuals associated with the grant
Pavilion, 4300 Military Road NW.,
the discussions could disclose applications, the disclosure of which
Washington, DC 20015.
confidential trade secrets or commercial would constitute a clearly unwarranted
Contact Person: Kirk Thompson, Ph.D.,
property such as patentable material, invasion of personal privacy.
Scientific Review Officer, Center for
and personal information concerning Scientific Review, National Institutes of
individuals associated with the grant Name of Committee: National Institute of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5184, Child Health and Human Development
applications, the disclosure of which MSC 7844, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301–435– Special Emphasis Panel; P01 Teleconference
would constitute a clearly unwarranted 1242, kgt@mail.nih.gov. Review.
invasion of personal privacy. Date: September 22, 2015.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Name of Committee: Integrative, Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; Time: 12:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m.
Functional and Cognitive Neuroscience Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333,
Integrated Review Group; Mechanisms of applications.
93.337, 93.393–93.396, 93.837–93.844, Place: National Institutes of Health,
Sensory, Perceptual, and Cognitive Processes
Study Section. 93.846–93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Neuroscience Center, 5B01, 6001 Executive
Date: September 30–October 1, 2015. Institutes of Health, HHS) Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone
Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. Dated: August 18, 2015. Conference Call).
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant Contact Person: Dennis E. Leszczynski,
applications. Michelle Trout, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific
Place: Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Review Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver
Pavilion, 4300 Military Road NW., Committee Policy. National Institute of Child Health and
Washington, DC 20015. [FR Doc. 2015–20752 Filed 8–21–15; 8:45 am] Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive
Contact Person: Kirk Thompson, Ph.D., Boulevard, Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
Scientific Review Officer, Center for 20892–9304, (301) 435–6884, leszczyd@
Scientific Review, National Institutes of mail.nih.gov.
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5184, (Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
MSC 7844, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301–435– Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research;
1242, kgt@mail.nih.gov. 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children;
Name of Committee: Integrative, 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation
Functional and Cognitive Neuroscience Research; 93.209, Contraception and
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:48 Aug 21, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00093 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24AUN1.SGM 24AUN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_51444/page/8.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-15 10:54:19
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 10:54:19
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice. | |
| Dates | Comments must be submitted September 23, 2015. | |
| Contact | Carl Harper, Director, Office of Resource Access and Partnerships, Indian Health Service, 801 Thompson Avenue, Suite 360, Rockville, Maryland 20852. Telephone 301/443-2694 (This is not a toll free number). | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 51281 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR