On February 29, 2016, the United States Court of International Trade (``CIT'' or ``Court'') sustained the Department of Commerce's (``Department'') final results of redetermination \1\ in which the Department determined, under protest, that four chests of Ethan Allen Operations, Inc. (``Ethan Allen'') are not subject to the scope of the WBF Order,\2\ pursuant to the CIT's remand order in Ethan Allen Operations, Inc. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 14-00147 (December 1, 2015) (``Ethan Allen''). ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Document
Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Scope Ruling and Notice of Amended Final Scope Ruling Pursuant to Court Decision
On February 29, 2016, the United States Court of International Trade (``CIT'' or ``Court'') sustained the Department of Commerce's (``Department'') final results of redeterminat...
Legal Citation
Federal Register Citation
Use this for formal legal and research references to the published document.
81 FR 14086
Web Citation
Suggested Web Citation
Use this when citing the archival web version of the document.
“Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Scope Ruling and Notice of Amended Final Scope Ruling Pursuant to Court Decision,” thefederalregister.org (March 16, 2016), https://thefederalregister.org/documents/2016-05942/wooden-bedroom-furniture-from-the-people-s-republic-of-china-notice-of-court-decision-not-in-harmony-with-final-scope-ru.