Document

Agency Procedures for Responding to Adverse Court Decisions and Addressing Funding Shortfalls

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is denying a petition for rulemaking (PRM) submitted on October 22, 2015, by Jeffrey M. Skov (the petitioner), and supplemented on D...

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is denying a petition for rulemaking (PRM) submitted on October 22, 2015, by Jeffrey M. Skov (the petitioner), and supplemented on December 7, 2015, March 1, 2016, March 21, 2016, and March 1, 2017. The petition was docketed by the NRC on November 10, 2015, and was assigned Docket No. PRM-2-15. The petitioner requests that the NRC amend its rules of practice to establish procedures for responding to adverse court decisions and to annually report to the public each instance where the NRC does not receive ``sufficient funds reasonably necessary to implement in good faith its statutory mandates.'' The NRC is denying the petition because the petitioner has not identified shortcomings in the NRC's current regulations or demonstrated a need for the requested changes.

Legal Citation

Federal Register Citation

Use this for formal legal and research references to the published document.

83 FR 50533

Web Citation

Suggested Web Citation

Use this when citing the archival web version of the document.

“Agency Procedures for Responding to Adverse Court Decisions and Addressing Funding Shortfalls,” thefederalregister.org (October 9, 2018), https://thefederalregister.org/documents/2018-21804/agency-procedures-for-responding-to-adverse-court-decisions-and-addressing-funding-shortfalls.