[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 92 (Thursday, May 13, 1999)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 25825-25828] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 99-11823] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [IA 069-1069a; FRL-6340-3] Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and Approval Under Section 112(l); State of Iowa AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: EPA is taking final action to approve two State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the state of Iowa. These revisions will strengthen the SIP with respect to attainment and maintenance of established air quality standards and with respect to hazardous air pollutants (HAP). The effect of this action is to ensure Federal enforceability of the state's air program rule revisions. DATES: This direct final rule is effective on July 12, 1999 without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by June 14, 1999. If adverse comment is received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public that the rule will not take effect. ADDRESSES: Comments may be addressed to Wayne A. Kaiser, Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 726 Minnesota Avenue, Kansas City, Kansas 66101. Copies of the state submittal are available at the following addresses for inspection during normal business hours: Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 726 Minnesota Avenue, Kansas City, Kansas 66101; and the Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center, Air Docket (6102), 401 M Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20460. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wayne Kaiser at (913) 551-7603. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This section provides additional information by addressing the following questions: What is a SIP? What is the Federal approval process for a SIP? What does Federal approval of a state regulation mean to me? What is approval under section 112(l)? What is being addressed in this notice? What action is EPA taking? What is a SIP? Section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires states to develop air pollution regulations and control strategies to ensure that state air quality meets the national ambient air quality standards established by EPA. These ambient standards are established under section 109 of the CAA, and they currently address six criteria pollutants. These pollutants are: carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, lead, particulate matter, and sulfur dioxide. Each state must submit these regulations and control strategies to EPA for approval and incorporation into the Federally enforceable SIP. Each Federally approved SIP protects air quality primarily by addressing air pollution at its point of origin. These SIPs can be extensive, containing state regulations or other enforceable documents and supporting information such as emission inventories, monitoring networks, and modeling demonstrations. What Is the Federal Approval Process for a SIP? In order for state regulations to be incorporated into the Federally enforceable SIP, states must formally adopt the regulations and control strategies consistent with state and Federal requirements. This process generally includes a public notice, public hearing, public comment period, and a formal adoption by a state-authorized rulemaking body. Once a state rule, regulation, or control strategy is adopted, the state submits it to EPA for inclusion into the SIP. EPA must provide public notice and seek additional public comment regarding the proposed Federal action on the state submission. If adverse comments are received, they must be addressed prior to any final Federal action by EPA. All state regulations and supporting information approved by EPA under section 110 of the CAA are incorporated into the Federally approved SIP. Records of such SIP actions are maintained in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at Title 40, Part 52, entitled ``Approval and Promulgations of Implementation Plans.'' The actual state regulations which are approved are not reproduced in their entirety in the CFR outright but are ``incorporated by reference,'' which means that EPA has approved a given state regulation with a specific effective date. What Does Federal Approval of a State Regulation Mean to Me? Enforcement of the state regulation before and after it is incorporated into the Federally approved SIP is primarily a state responsibility. However, after the regulation is Federally approved, EPA is authorized to take enforcement action against violators. Citizens are also offered legal recourse to address violations as described in the CAA. What Is Approval Under Section 112(l)? Section 112(l) of the CAA provides authority for EPA to implement a program to regulate HAPs, and to subsequently delegate authority for this program to the states. EPA has delegated authority for this program to Iowa and has approved relevant state HAP rules under this authority. In this action, EPA is approving revisions to the section 112(l) approved state rules. What Is Being addressed in This Notice? The Iowa Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) revised a number of its rules in order to maintain equivalency with Federal requirements and to adopt hospital/medical/ infectious waste incinerator regulations. The revisions include an update to the definitions rule, to the permitting rules, and to the testing and monitoring rule. The state also adopted by reference the revised Federal National Ambient Air Quality Standards promulgated on July 15, 1997. The revised rule chapters are: Chapter 20, ``Scope of Title- Definitions-Forms-Rules of Practice''; Chapter 22, ``Controlling Pollution''; Chapter 23, [[Page 25826]] ``Emissions Standards for Contaminants''; Chapter 25, ``Measurement of Emissions''; and Chapter 28, ``Ambient Air Quality Standards,'' 567 Iowa Administrative Code. Specific Chapter paragraphs and subparagraphs which were revised are: 20.2, 22.1(1), 22.1(2), 22.1(3), 22.203(1), 22.203(2), 22.300(8), 23.1(1), 25.1(10), and 28.1. All of these rules are being approved under the authority of section 110, and the underlined rules are also being approved under the authority of section 112(l). These revisions to the Iowa SIP were submitted by Larry Wilson, IDNR Director, on December 11, 1998, and January 29, 1999. The state effective date for these revisions are October 14, 1998, except for rules 22.1(2) and 25.1(10), which were effective December 23, 1998. Have the Requirements for Approval of a SIP Revision Been Met? The state submittals have met the public notice requirements for SIP submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submittals also satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. In addition, as explained above and in more detail in the technical support documents which are part of this notice, the revisions meet the substantive SIP requirements of the CAA, including section 110 and implementing regulations. What Action Is EPA Taking? EPA is processing this action as a direct final action because this amendment to the Iowa SIP makes routine revisions to the existing rules which are noncontroversial. Therefore, we do not anticipate any adverse comments. Conclusion Final Action EPA is taking final action to approve, as an amendment to the Iowa SIP, rule revisions submitted by the state of Iowa as discussed above. These rules are being approved under the authority of section 110, and, for certain rules, the authority of section 112(l). EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision should adverse comments be filed. This rule will be effective July 12, 1999 without further notice unless the Agency receives adverse comments by June 14, 1999. If EPA receives such comments, then EPA will publish a document withdrawing the final rule and informing the public that the rule will not take effect. All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period. Parties interested in commenting should do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public is advised that this rule will be effective on July 12, 1999, and no further action will be taken on the proposed rule. Administrative Requirements A. Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this regulatory action from E.O. 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and Review.'' B. E.O. 12875 Under E.O. 12875, EPA may not issue a regulation that is not required by statute and that creates a mandate upon a state, local, or tribal government, unless the Federal Government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct compliance costs incurred by those governments, or EPA consults with those governments. If EPA complies by consulting, E.O. 12875 requires EPA to provide to the OMB a description of the extent of EPA's prior consultation with representatives of affected state, local, and tribal governments; a summary of the nature of their concerns; copies of any written communications from the governments; and a statement supporting the need to issue the regulation. In addition, E.O. 12875 requires EPA to develop an effective process permitting elected officials and other representatives of state, local, and tribal governments ``to provide meaningful and timely input in the development of regulatory proposals containing significant unfunded mandates.'' Today's rule does not create a mandate on state, local, or tribal governments. The rule does not impose any enforceable duties on these entities. Accordingly, the requirements of section 1(a) of E.O. 12875 do not apply to this rule. C. E.O. 13045 Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) applies to any rule that: (1) is determined to be ``economically significant'' as defined under E.O. 12866, and (2) concerns an environmental health or safety risk that EPA has reason to believe may have a disproportionate effect on children. If the regulatory action meets both criteria, the Agency must evaluate the environmental health or safety effects of the planned rule on children, and explain why the planned regulation is preferable to other potentially effective and reasonably feasible alternatives considered by the Agency. This rule is not subject to E.O. 13045 because it is not an economically significant regulatory action as defined by E.O. 12866, and it does not address an environmental health or safety risk that would have a disproportionate effect on children. D. E.O. 13084 Under E.O. 13084, EPA may not issue a regulation that is not required by statute, that significantly or uniquely affects the communities of Indian tribal governments, and that imposes substantial direct compliance costs on those communities, unless the Federal government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct compliance costs incurred by the tribal governments, or EPA consults with those governments. If EPA complies by consulting, E.O. 13084 requires EPA to provide to the OMB, in a separately identified section of the preamble to the rule, a description of the extent of EPA's prior consultation with representatives of affected tribal governments, a summary of the nature of their concerns, and a statement supporting the need to issue the regulation. In addition, E.O. 13084 requires EPA to develop an effective process permitting elected officials and other representatives of Indian tribal governments ``to provide meaningful and timely input in the development of regulatory policies on matters that significantly or uniquely affect their communities.'' Today's rule does not significantly or uniquely affect the communities of Indian tribal governments. This action does not involve or impose any requirements that affect Indian tribes. Accordingly, the requirements of section 3(b) of E.O. 13084 do not apply to this rule. E. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) The RFA generally requires an agency to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements, unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit [[Page 25827]] enterprises, and small governmental jurisdictions. This final rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities because SIP approvals under section 110 and Subchapter I, Part D of the CAA do not create any new requirements but simply approve requirements that the state is already imposing. Therefore, because the Federal SIP approval does not create any new requirements, I certify that this action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Moreover, due to the nature of the Federal- state relationship under the CAA, preparation of flexibility analysis would constitute Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of state action. The CAA forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co., v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2). F. Unfunded Mandates Under section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (``Unfunded Mandates Act'') signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in estimated annual costs to state, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate, or to private sector, of $100 million or more. Under section 205, EPA must select the most cost-effective and least burdensome alternative that achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent with statutory requirements. Section 203 requires EPA to establish a plan for informing and advising any small governments that may be significantly or uniquely impacted by the rule. EPA has determined that the approval action promulgated does not include a Federal mandate that may result in estimated annual costs of $100 million or more to either state, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate, or to the private sector. This Federal action approves preexisting requirements under state or local law and imposes no new requirements. Accordingly, no additional costs to state, local, or tribal governments, or to the private sector, result from this action. G. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the United States Senate, the United States House of Representatives, and the United States Comptroller General prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). H. Petitions for Judicial Review Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by July 12, 1999. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: April 28, 1999 William Rice, Regional Administrator, Region VII. Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: PART 52--[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart Q--Iowa 2. In section 52.820 the following entries for paragraph (c), EPA- approved regulations, are revised to read as follows: Sec. 52.820 Identification of plan. * * * * * (c) EPA-approved regulations. EPA-Approved Iowa Regulations ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- State Iowa citation Title effective EPA approval date Comments date ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Iowa Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Commission [567] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chapter 20 Scope of Title-Definitions-Forms-Rule of Practice ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * 567-20.2............. Definitions....... 10/14/98 5/13/99 64 FR 25827................. * * * * * * * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chapter 22 Controlling Pollution ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * 567-22.1............. Permits Required 12/23/98 5/13/99 64 FR 25827................. Subrule 22.1(3) for New or ``b''(9) has not Existing been approved. Stationary Sources. * * * * * * * 567-22.203........... Voluntary 10/14/98 5/13/99 64 FR 25827................. Operating Permit Applications. [[Page 25828]] * * * * * * * 567-22.300........... Operating Permit 10/14/98 5/13/99 64 FR 25828................. by Rule for Small Sources. * * * * * * * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chapter 23 Emission Standards for Contaminants ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * 567-23.1............. Emission Standards 10/14/98 5/13/99 64 FR 25828................. Sections 23.1(2)- (5) are not approved in the SIP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chapter 25 Measurement of Emissions ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * 567-25.1............. Testing and 12/23/98 5/13/99 64 FR 25828................. Subrule 25.1(12) Sampling of New has not been and Existing approved. Equipment. * * * * * * * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chapter 28 Ambient Air Quality Standards ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * 567-28.1............. Statewide 10/14/98 5/13/99 64 FR 25828................. Standards. * * * * * * * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [FR Doc. 99-11823 Filed 5-12-99; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Document
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and Approval Under Section 112(l); State of Iowa
EPA is taking final action to approve two State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the state of Iowa. These revisions will strengthen the SIP with respect to attai...
Legal Citation
Federal Register Citation
Use this for formal legal and research references to the published document.
64 FR 25825
Web Citation
Suggested Web Citation
Use this when citing the archival web version of the document.
“Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and Approval Under Section 112(l); State of Iowa,” thefederalregister.org (May 13, 1999), https://thefederalregister.org/documents/99-11823/approval-and-promulgation-of-implementation-plans-and-approval-under-section-112-l-state-of-iowa.