[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 172 (Tuesday, September 7, 1999)] [Notices] [Pages 48695-48697] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 99-23106] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-41788; File No. SR-Phlx-99-29] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc. Relating to Mandatory Trading Floor Training Requirements August 25, 1999. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that on August 5, 1999, the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II and III, below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to amend Phlx Rule 625, Options Trading Floor Training, to include equity floor members.\3\ The proposal will require all equity floor members and their respective personnel to complete mandatory training related to that employee's function on the trading floor. The Exchange proposes to adopt new Equity Floor Procedure Advice, F-30, Equity Trading Floor Training, and an accompanying fine schedule, such that a minor rule violation enforcement and reporting plan (``minor rule plan'') citation could be issued.\4\ The text of amended Rule 625 and new Equity Floor Procedure Advice is presented below. Deleted text is brackets, and new text in italics. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ On March 22, 1999, the Commission approved a similar proposal with respect to equity option and index option floor members. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 41201 (March 22, 1999) 64 FR 15391 (March 31, 1999) (SR-Phlx-99-06). \4\ The Phlx's minor rule plan, codified in Phlx Rule 970, contains floor procedure advices with accompanying fine schedules. Rule 19d-1(c)(2) authorizes national securities exchanges to adopt minor rule violation plans for summary discipline and abbreviated reporting; Rule 19d-1(c)(1) requires prompt filing with the Commission of any final disciplinary actions. However, minor rule violations not exceeding $2,500 are deemed not final, thereby permitting periodic, as opposed to immediate, reporting. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- F-30 EQUITY TRADING FLOOR TRAINING All new equity floor members, whether specialists or floor brokers, and their respective personnel, shall successfully complete mandatory training related to that employee's function on the trading floor. All current members and their respective personnel shall be subject to continuing mandatory training requirements in order to instruct these individuals on changes in existing automated systems or any new technology that is utilized by the Exchange. Failure to attend the scheduled mandatory training described above may result in the issuance of a fine in accordance with the fine schedule below. Fine Schedule (Implemented on a three year running calendar basis) F-30 1st Occurence $250.00 2nd Occurence $350.00 3rd Occurence $500.00 [[Page 48696]] 4th Occurence Sanction is discretionary with Business Conduct Committee Rule 625 [Options] Trading Floor Training All new equity, equity option and index option floor members, whether specialists, floor brokers or Registered Options Traders, and their respective personnel, shall successfully complete mandatory training related to that employee's function on the trading floor. All current members and their respective personnel shall be subject to continuing mandatory training requirements in order to instruct these individuals on changes in existing automated systems or any new technology that is utilized by the Exchange. II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement Regarding the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change The purpose of the proposal is to require all new equity floor members, whether specialists or floor brokers, and their respective personnel, to attend mandatory training related to that employee's function on the trading floor. In addition, all current equity floor members and their respective personnel shall be subject to continuing training requirements. The Exchange believes that continued training requirements are necessary in order to instruct these individuals on changes in existing automated systems or new technology that is utilized by the Exchange. The Exchange intends to schedule and give notice of such training sessions, as it deems appropriate. In this way, the proposal should help to ensure that all members are familiar with new technology or changes in existing technology. Technology advances are ever-changing. To benefit users and remain competitive, the Exchange believes it is imperative to implement technology improvements and system enhancements. Moreover, these improvements and enhancements often provide for more efficient and quicker dissemination of information to the markets, thereby allowing investors to receive information on a more timely basis. Furthermore, technology improvements and system enhancements generally reduce the risk of clerical error. Therefore, the Exchange believes that mandated training will help to ensure that Exchange members and their respective personnel are proficient in using new technology, which should help to promote a more efficient trading environment. Additionally, the mandated training requirement would be incorporated as an Equity Floor Procedure Advice, such that a minor rule plan citation could be issued.\5\ The minor rule plan will enable the Exchange to quickly sanction members for non-compliance.\6\ Under Phlx Rule 625, if an Exchange member has not participated in mandatory or continuing training requirements, a fine can be issued immediately. The Phlx believes the issuance of a fine will help to alleviate situations where failure to partcipate in mandatory training is a recurring problem, because violations by a member organization will result in escalating fines, and, eventually, possible disciplinary action by the Exchange's Business Conduct Committee (``BCC''). For failure to attend an Exchange mandated training class, the Exchange proposes a fine of (i) $250 for a first offense; (ii) $350 for a second offense; and (iii) $500 for a third offense. The sanction is discretionary with the BCC for a fourth offense. The Exchange believes that this type of violation is appropriate for the minor rule plan because it is objective and, thus violations are readily subject to verification. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ The Phlx also proposes to amend its minor rule plan to include the new advice. \6\ The Fine Schedule allows for a fine to be implemented on a three-year running calendar basis. The term ``three-year running calendar basis'' means that the Exchange will impose sanctions on a three-year running cycle, by which a violation of the training requirements which occurs within three years of the first violation of the training requiremenets, will be treated as a second occurrence, and any subsequent violation within three years of the previous violation of the training requirements will be subject to the next hgighest sanction specified in the Fine Schedule. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For these reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with Section 6 of the Act,\7\ in general, and with Section 6(b)(5),\8\ in particular, in that it is designed to facilitate transactions in securities and to promote just and equitable principles of trade. Specifically, the Exchange believes that the proposal will promote a more efficient trading environment by (i) educating personnel regarding the use of improved technology and system enhancements; (ii) providing for quicker dissemination of information because the Exchange can train personnel as soon as changes are made; and (iii) lessening the risk of clerical errors. Moreover, mandatory training for equity floor members and their respective personnel is consistent with the provisions of Section 6(c)(3)(B) of the Act,\9\ which makes it the responsibility of an exchange to prescribe standards of training, experience, and competence for persons associated with self-regulatory organization members. In addition, the Exchange believes the proposal is consistent with the Securities Industry Continuing Education Program, which seeks to promote the protection of investors through periodic training of securities professionals. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f. \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(c)(3)(B). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule will impose any inappropriate burden on competition. C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others No written comments were either solicited or received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Because the foregoing proposed rule change: (1) Does not significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (2) does not impose any significant burden on competition; and (3) does not become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed and the Exchange provided the Commission with written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at least five business days prior to the filing date, it has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \10\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \11\ thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public [[Page 48697]] interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). \11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Persons making written submissions should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549-0609. Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the pubic in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Section, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Phlx. All submissions should refer to File No. SR-Phlx-99-29 and should be submitted by September 28, 1999. For the Commission by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.\12\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Margaret H. McFarland, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 99-23106 Filed 9-3-99; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
Document
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc. Relating to Mandatory Trading Floor Training Requirements
[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 172 (Tuesday, September 7, 1999)] [Notices] [Pages 48695-48697] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [ www.g...
Legal Citation
Federal Register Citation
Use this for formal legal and research references to the published document.
64 FR 48695
Web Citation
Suggested Web Citation
Use this when citing the archival web version of the document.
“Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc. Relating to Mandatory Trading Floor Training Requirements,” thefederalregister.org (September 7, 1999), https://thefederalregister.org/documents/99-23106/self-regulatory-organizations-notice-of-filing-and-immediate-effectiveness-of-proposed-rule-change-by-the-philadelphia-s.