[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 16, 1999)] [Notices] [Pages 62194-62195] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 99-29768] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [Region II Docket No. NY 36-201; FRL-6474-4] Adequacy Status of the Submitted 2002 and 2005 Rate of Progress Plans and 2007 Attainment Demonstration for the Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Transportation Conformity Purposes for the New York State Portion of the New York-New Jersey-Connecticut Severe Ozone Nonattainment Area
Agency
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Action
Notice of adequacy and inadequacy.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary
In this notice, EPA is notifying the public that we have found that the motor vehicle emissions budgets for volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides in the submitted 2002 and 2005 rate of progress plans for the New York State portion of the New York-New Jersey- Connecticut severe nonattainment area for ozone to be adequate for conformity purposes. We are also notifying the public that we have found the motor vehicle emissions budgets for volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides in the submitted 2007 attainment demonstration for the New York State portion of the New York-New Jersey-Connecticut severe nonattainment area for ozone to be inadequate for conformity purposes. On March 2, 1999, the DC Circuit Court ruled that submitted state implementation plans (SIPs) cannot be used for conformity determinations until EPA has affirmatively found them adequate. As a result of our finding, the New York State portion of the New York-New Jersey-Connecticut severe nonattainment area for ozone can use the motor vehicle emissions budgets for volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides from the submitted 2002 and 2005 rate of progress plans for ozone for future conformity determinations. These budgets are effective December 1, 1999. As a result of our finding on the submitted 2007 attainment demonstration budgets for volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides, this area cannot use these motor vehicle emissions budgets for future conformity determinations.
For Further Information Contact
Rudolph K. Kapichak, Mobile Source Team Leader, Air Programs Branch, Environmental Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, New York 10007-1866, (212) 637-3804, e- mail address: Kapichak.Rudolph@epa.gov. The finding and the response to comments will be available at EPA's conformity website: www.epa.gov/oms/traq, (once there, click on the ``Conformity'' button, then look for ``Adequacy Review of SIP Submissions for Conformity'').
www.epa.gov/oms/traqSupplementary Information
Background
Today's document is simply an announcement of a finding that we have already made. EPA Region 2 sent a letter to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation on November 1, 1999 stating that the motor vehicle emissions budgets in the submitted 2002 and 2005 rate of progress plans for the New York State portion of the New York- New Jersey-Connecticut severe nonattainment area for ozone are adequate for conformity purposes and that the motor vehicle emissions budgets for volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides in the submitted 2007 attainment
demonstration for this ozone nonattainment area are inadequate for conformity purposes. The 2007 budgets associated with the attainment demonstration are inadequate because when they are considered with all other emission sources they are not consistent with the applicable requirements for attainment. This finding will also be announced on EPA's conformity website: www.epa.gov/oms/traq, (once there, click on the ``Conformity'' button, then look for ``Adequacy Review of SIP Submissions for Conformity''). Transportation conformity is required by section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act. EPA's conformity rule requires that transportation plans, programs, and projects conform to state air quality implementation plans (SIPs) and establishes the criteria and procedures for determining whether or not they do. Conformity to a SIP means that transportation activities will not produce new air quality violations, worsen existing violations, or delay timely attainment of the national ambient air quality standards. The criteria by which we determine whether a SIP's motor vehicle emission budgets are adequate for conformity purposes are outlined in 40 CFR 93.118(e)(4). Please note that an adequacy review is separate from EPA's completeness review, and it also should not be used to prejudge EPA's ultimate approval of the SIP. Even if we find a budget adequate, the SIP could later be disapproved. We've described our process for determining the adequacy of submitted SIP budgets in guidance (May 14, 1999 memo titled ``Conformity Guidance on Implementation of March 2, 1999 Conformity Court Decision''). We followed this guidance in making our adequacy determination.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: November 1, 1999. William J. Muszynski, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 2. [FR Doc. 99-29768 Filed 11-15-99; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P