80 FR 12648 - Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent Decree

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 46 (March 10, 2015)

Page Range		12648-12649
FR Document		2015-05493

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 46 (Tuesday, March 10, 2015)

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 46 (Tuesday, March 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12648-12649]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05493]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent Decree

    In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. 
Abeldgaard, et al., Civil Action No. A-01-378 (RRB), was lodged with 
the United States District Court for the District of Alaska on March 4, 
2015.
    This proposed Consent Decree concerns a complaint filed by the 
United States on behalf of the United States Environmental Protection 
Agency against, inter alia, Clarence Abeldgaard, Oceanview Enterprises, 
Inc. and Geraldine Barling, pursuant to Section 301(a) of the Clean 
Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1311(a), to obtain injunctive relief from, and 
impose civil penalties on, the Defendants for violating the Clean Water 
Act by discharging dredged or fill material into the waters of the 
United States near Anchor Point, Alaska, without authorization by the 
United States Army Corps of Engineers. The proposed Consent Decree 
resolves the allegations against Ms. Barling.
    The Department of Justice will accept written comments relating to 
this proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the date of 
publication of this Notice. Please address comments to Mark A. 
Nitczynski, Senior Trial Counsel, United States Department of Justice, 
Environment and Natural Resources Division, Environmental Defense 
Section, 999 18th Street, South Terrace, Suite 370, Denver, CO 80202 
and refer to United States v. Abeldgaard, et al., USAO File No. 
2001V0026, EPA Region X, DJ # 90-5-1-1-16195.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Clerk's Office, 
United States District Court for the District of Alaska, United States 
Courthouse, 222 West Seventh Avenue, Room 229, Anchorage, AK 99513. In 
addition, the proposed Consent Decree may be examined electronically at 
http://

[[Page 12649]]

www.justice.gov/enrd/Consent_Decrees.html.

Cherie L. Rogers,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Defense Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2015-05493 Filed 3-9-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4410-15-P

12648 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 46 / Tuesday, March 10, 2015 / Notices

SUMMARY: The Transportation Security appropriate automated, electronic, training providers will carry an annual
Administration (TSA) invites public mechanical, or other technological record keeping burden of 104 hours, for
comment on one currently approved collection techniques or other forms of a total of 509,600 hours. Thus, TSA
Information Collection Request (ICR), information technology. estimates the combined hour burden
Office of Management and Budget associated with this collection to be
Information Collection Requirement
(OMB) control number 1652–0021, 547,100 hours annually.
abstracted below, that we will submit to OMB Control Number 1652–0021,
Dated: March 4, 2015.
OMB for renewal in compliance with Flight Training for Aliens and Other
Designated Individuals; Security Christina A. Walsh,
the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA).
Awareness Training for Flight School TSA Paperwork Reduction Act Officer, Office
The ICR describes the nature of the of Information Technology.
information collection and its expected Employees, 49 CFR part 1552. Pursuant
to section 612 of the Vision 100— [FR Doc. 2015–05465 Filed 3–9–15; 8:45 am]
burden. The collection involves gaining
information to conduct security threat Century of Aviation Reauthorization Act BILLING CODE 9110–05–P

assessments for all aliens and other (49 U.S.C. 44939), TSA is required to
designated individuals seeking flight conduct security threat assessments for
instruction (‘‘candidates’’) from Federal all aliens and other designated
individuals seeking flight instruction DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Aviation Administration (FAA)-certified
flight training providers. Pursuant to with Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA)-certified flight training providers. Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent
statute, TSA will use the information Decree
collected to determine whether a On September 20, 2004, TSA
candidate poses a threat to aviation or promulgated regulations (49 CFR part In accordance with Departmental
national security, and thus prohibited 1552) to transfer the program from the Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby
from receiving flight training. Department of Justice to TSA and to given that a proposed Consent Decree in
Additionally, flight training providers make appropriate amendments to United States v. Abeldgaard, et al., Civil
are required to conduct a security determine that candidates do not pose a Action No. A–01–378 (RRB), was lodged
awareness training program for their threat to aviation or national security with the United States District Court for
employees and to maintain records and thus permitted to receive flight the District of Alaska on March 4, 2015.
associated with this training. training. The collection of information
This proposed Consent Decree
required under 49 CFR part 1552
DATES: Send your comments by May 11, concerns a complaint filed by the
includes candidates’ biographic
2015. United States on behalf of the United
information and fingerprints, which
ADDRESSES: Comments may be emailed States Environmental Protection Agency
TSA uses to perform the security threat
to TSAPRA@dhs.gov or delivered to the against, inter alia, Clarence Abeldgaard,
assessment. Additionally, flight training
TSA PRA Officer, Office of Information Oceanview Enterprises, Inc. and
providers are required to maintain
Technology (OIT), TSA–11, records of having conducted security Geraldine Barling, pursuant to Section
Transportation Security Administration, awareness training for their employees 301(a) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C.
601 South 12th Street Arlington, VA to increase awareness of suspicious 1311(a), to obtain injunctive relief from,
20598–6011. circumstances and activities of and impose civil penalties on, the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: individuals enrolling in, or attending, Defendants for violating the Clean Water
Christina A. Walsh at the above address, flight training. Each flight training Act by discharging dredged or fill
or by telephone (571) 227–2062. provider employee must receive material into the waters of the United
security awareness training within 60 States near Anchor Point, Alaska,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
days of being hired and on an annual without authorization by the United
Comments Invited recurring basis. The flight training States Army Corps of Engineers. The
In accordance with the Paperwork providers must maintain records of the proposed Consent Decree resolves the
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 training completed throughout the allegations against Ms. Barling.
et seq.), an agency may not conduct or course of the individual’s employment, The Department of Justice will accept
sponsor, and a person is not required to and for one year after the individual is written comments relating to this
respond to, a collection of information no longer a flight training provider proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30)
unless it displays a valid OMB control employee. days from the date of publication of this
number. The ICR documentation is Based on the numbers of respondents Notice. Please address comments to
available at http://www.reginfo.gov. to date, TSA estimates a total of 39,900 Mark A. Nitczynski, Senior Trial
Therefore, in preparation for OMB respondents annually: 35,000 Counsel, United States Department of
review and approval of the following candidates and 4,900 flight training Justice, Environment and Natural
information collection, TSA is soliciting providers. Respondents are required to Resources Division, Environmental
comments to— provide the subject information every Defense Section, 999 18th Street, South
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed time an alien or other designated Terrace, Suite 370, Denver, CO 80202
information requirement is necessary for individual applies for pilot training as and refer to United States v.
the proper performance of the functions described in the regulation and Abeldgaard, et al., USAO File No.
of the agency, including whether the subsequent interpretations, which is 2001V0026, EPA Region X, DJ # 90–5–
information will have practical utility; estimated to be 50,000 responses per 1–1–16195.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the year. TSA estimates an average of 45 The proposed Consent Decree may be
agency’s estimate of the burden; minutes to complete each application, examined at the Clerk’s Office, United
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and for a total approximate application States District Court for the District of
clarity of the information to be burden of 37,500 hours per year. Flight Alaska, United States Courthouse, 222
collected; and training providers must keep records for West Seventh Avenue, Room 229,
(4) Minimize the burden of the each flight training candidate for five Anchorage, AK 99513. In addition, the
collection of information on those who years from the time they are created. It proposed Consent Decree may be
are to respond, including using is estimated each of the 4,900 flight examined electronically at http://

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:53 Mar 09, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM 10MRN1

Document Created: 2018-02-21 09:34:53
Document Modified: 2018-02-21 09:34:53

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
FR Citation		80 FR 12648