80 FR 12649 - Compliance With Phase 2 of Order EA-13-109
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 46 (March 10, 2015)
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 46 (March 10, 2015)
| Page Range | 12649-12651 | |
| FR Document | 2015-05436 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 46 (Tuesday, March 10, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 12649-12651] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-05436] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2015-0048] Compliance With Phase 2 of Order EA-13-109 AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Draft interim staff guidance; request for comment. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing for public comment its Japan Lessons-Learned Division (JLD) draft interim staff guidance (ISG), ``Compliance with Phase 2 of Order EA-13-109, Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation under Severe Accident Conditions,'' (JLD- ISG-2015-01). This draft JLD-ISG would provide guidance and clarification to assist nuclear power reactor licensees identify measures needed to comply with Phase 2 requirements of the ``Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions,'' (Order EA-13- 109) to have either a vent path from the containment drywell or a strategy that makes it unlikely that venting would be needed from the drywell before alternate reliable containment heat removal and pressure control is reestablished. DATES: Submit comments by April 9, 2015. Comments received after this date will be considered, if it is practical to do so, but the Commission is able to ensure consideration only for comments received before this date. ADDRESSES: You may submit comment by any of the following methods (unless this document describes a different method for submitting comments on a specific subject):Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2015-0048. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415- 3463; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey, Office of Administration, Mail Stop: OWFN-12-H08, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. For additional direction on obtaining information and submitting comments, see ``Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments'' in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rajender Auluck, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-1025; email: Rajender.Auluck@nrc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments A. Obtaining Information Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2015-0048 when contacting the NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You may obtain publicly-available information related to this action by the following methods: Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2015-0048. NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may access publicly-available documents online in the NRC Library at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and then select ``Begin Web- based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415- 4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The ADAMS accession number for each document referenced in this notice (if that document is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time that a document is referenced. The draft JLD-ISG-2015-01 is available in ADAMS under Accession No. ML15051A143. The ISG for complying with Phase 1 requirements of the order (JLD-ISG-2013-02) was issued on November 14, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No. ML13304B836). NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. NRC's Interim Staff Guidance Web site: JLD-ISG documents are also available online under the ``Japan Lessons Learned'' heading at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/isg/japan-lessons-learned.html. B. Submitting Comments Please include Docket ID NRC-2015-0048 in the subject line of your comment submission, in order to ensure that the NRC is able to make your comment submission available to the public in this docket. The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact information that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in your comment submission. The NRC posts all comment submissions at http://www.regulations.gov as well as entering the comment submissions into ADAMS. The NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove identifying or contact information. If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be publicly disclosed in their comment submission. Your request should state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove such information before making the comment submissions available to the public or entering the comment submissions into ADAMS. II. Background The NRC developed draft JLD-ISG-2015-01 to provide guidance and clarification to assist nuclear power reactor licensees with the identification of methods needed to comply with Phase 2 requirements in Order EA-13-109, ``Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation under Severe Accident Conditions'' (ADAMS Accession No. ML13130A067). The draft ISG would not be a substitute for the requirements in Order EA-13-109, and compliance with the ISG would not be a requirement. This ISG is being issued in draft form for public comment to involve the public in development of the implementing guidance. The accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power station reinforced the importance of reliable operation of containment vents for boiling-water reactor (BWR) plants with Mark I and Mark II containments. As part of its response to the lessons learned from the accident, on March 12, 2012, the NRC issued Order EA-12-050 (ADAMS Accession No. ML12056A043) requiring licensees to upgrade or install a reliable hardened containment venting system (HCVS) for Mark I and Mark II containments. The requirements in Order EA-12-050 for licensees with [[Page 12650]] BWR plants with Mark I and Mark II containments were intended to increase the reliability of containment venting to support decay heat removal from the reactor core and provide protection against over- pressurization of the primary containments. While developing the requirements for Order EA-12-050, the NRC acknowledged that questions remained about maintaining containment integrity and limiting the release of radioactive materials if licensees used the venting systems during severe accident conditions. The NRC staff presented the Commission with options to address these issues in SECY-12-0157, ``Consideration of Additional Requirements for Containment Venting Systems for Boiling Water Reactors with Mark I and Mark II Containments'' (issued November 26, 2012, ADAMS Accession No. ML12325A704). The options presented in SECY-12-0157 included continuing with the implementation of Order EA-12-050 for reliable hardened vents (Option 1); requiring licensees to upgrade or replace the reliable hardened vents required by EA-12-050 with a containment venting system designed and installed to remain functional during severe accident conditions (Option 2); requiring licensees with BWR Mark I and Mark II containments to install an engineered filtered containment venting system intended to prevent the release of significant amounts of radioactive material following the dominant severe accident sequences (Option 3); and pursuing development of requirements and technical acceptance criteria for performance-based confinement strategies (Option 4). The NRC staff provided an evaluation considering various quantitative analyses and qualitative factors related to the options and recommended the Commission approve Option 3 to require the installation of an engineered filtering system. One issue not specifically addressed within SECY-12-0157 was the importance of water addition to cool core debris as part of severe accident management for BWR's with Mark I and II containments. The NRC staff acknowledged in SECY-12-0157 that in the longer-term rulemaking associated with any of the options presented, the NRC could consider adding requirements for the capability of core debris cooling during severe accident scenarios. In the staff requirements memorandum (SRM) for SECY-12-0157, dated March 19, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No. ML13078A017), the Commission directed the staff to: (1) Issue a modification to Order EA-12-050 requiring BWR licensees with Mark I and Mark II containments to upgrade or replace the reliable hardened vents required by Order EA-12-050 with a containment venting system designed and installed to remain functional during severe accident conditions, and (2) develop a technical basis and rulemaking for filtering strategies with drywell filtration and severe accident management of BWR Mark I and II containments. The NRC subsequently issued Order EA-13-109 to define requirements and schedules for licensees for BWRs with Mark I and Mark II containments to install severe accident capable containment venting systems. The NRC staff also initiated development and evaluation of other possible regulatory actions identified in the Commission's SRM for SECY-12-0157, including the development of a technical basis in support of a Containment Protection and Release Reduction (CPRR) rulemaking. Order EA-13-109, in addition to requiring a reliable HCVS to assist in preventing core damage when heat removal capability is lost (the purpose of EA-12-050), will ensure that venting functions are also available during severe accident conditions. Severe accident conditions include the elevated temperatures, pressures, radiation levels, and combustible gas concentrations, such as hydrogen and carbon monoxide, associated with accidents involving extensive core damage, including accidents involving a breach of the reactor vessel by molten core debris. The safety improvements to Mark I and Mark II containment venting systems required by Order EA-13-109 increase confidence in licensees' ability to maintain the containment function following core damage events. Although venting the containment during severe accident conditions could result in the release of radioactive materials, venting could also prevent containment structural failures and gross penetration leakage due to overpressurization that would hamper accident management (e.g., continuing efforts to cool core debris) and ultimately result in larger, uncontrolled releases of radioactive material. In recognition of the relative importance of venting capabilities from the wetwell and drywell, a phased approach to implementation is being used to minimize delays in implementing the requirements originally imposed by Order EA-12-050. Phase 1 involves upgrading the venting capabilities from the containment wetwell to provide reliable, severe accident capable hardened vents to assist in preventing core damage and, if necessary, to provide venting capability during severe accident conditions. Phase 2 involves providing additional protection during severe accident conditions through installation of a reliable, severe accident capable drywell vent system or the development of a reliable containment venting strategy that makes it unlikely that a licensee would need to vent from the containment drywell during severe accident conditions. For implementation of Phase 1 order requirements, the NRC issued JLD-ISG-2013-02 on November 14, 2013 (78 FR 70356), which endorsed, with clarifications, the methodologies described in the industry guidance document Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 13-02, Rev. 0 (ADAMS Accession No. ML13316A853). As required by the order, licensees submitted their site-specific overall integrated plans by June 30, 2014. The NRC is currently reviewing these plans and expects to complete those reviews by June 2015. The focus of this ISG is to provide guidance for Phase 2 requirements of the order. Some proposed approaches to implement Phase 2 requirements of the order include the addition of water to the drywell during severe accident conditions. Evaluations performed by the NRC and industry in conjunction with the CPRR rulemaking show that water addition during severe accident conditions provides benefits that include reducing temperatures and cooling molten core debris. In SECY- 12-0157, the NRC discussed various risk assessments by the NRC and industry that have concluded that adding water to the drywell reduces the likelihood of release of radioactive materials for those severe accident scenarios that involve fuel melting through the reactor vessel. The water added to the drywell cools the molten fuel and can arrest the melting fuel's progression and reduce the likelihood of a loss of the containment function through liner melt-through, containment over-pressurization failure, and containment over- temperature failure. In addition to the benefits associated with containment protection, recent technical evaluations performed by both the industry and the NRC indicate that including the capability of timely severe accident water addition (SAWA) results in a substantially lower drywell temperature for consideration in designing the drywell vent. Therefore, SAWA will facilitate implementation of Phase 2 of Order EA-13-109 by establishing the design conditions for a drywell vent and supporting severe accident water management (SAWM) for [[Page 12651]] licensees choosing to pursue that option as a strategy that makes it unlikely that a licensee would need to vent from the drywell. On December 10, 2014, NEI submitted NEI 13-02, ``Industry Guidance for Compliance with Order EA-13-109,'' Rev. 0E2 (ADAMS Accession No. ML1434A374) to assist nuclear power licensees with the identification of measures needed to comply with the requirements of Order EA-13-109 regarding reliable hardened containment vents capable of operation under severe accident conditions. The NEI document includes guidance for implementing order requirements for both Phase 1 and Phase 2, including the industry's proposed approach to use the SAWA and SAWM strategies to control the water levels in the suppression pool and maintain capabilities to address over-pressure conditions without a severe accident drywell vent. As described in the draft ISG, some issues remain the subject of ongoing discussions as part of finalizing the guidance. These include: (1) Availability of power and functional requirements for the SAWA-related installed and portable equipment, (2) duration of time for preservation of the wetwell vent for the SAWM strategy, and (3) alternate control of containment conditions during recovery from the severe accident. The NRC intends to continue discussions with stakeholders prior to finalizing the ISG for Phase 2 of the order and endorsing, with clarifications and exceptions if necessary, the methodologies described in the industry guidance document NEI 13-02, Rev. 0E2. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 2nd day of March 2015. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Jack R. Davis, Director, Japan Lessons-Learned Division, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. [FR Doc. 2015-05436 Filed 3-9-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 46 / Tuesday, March 10, 2015 / Notices 12649
www.justice.gov/enrd/Consent_ • Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey, B. Submitting Comments
Decrees.html. Office of Administration, Mail Stop: Please include Docket ID NRC–2015–
OWFN–12–H08, U.S. Nuclear 0048 in the subject line of your
Cherie L. Rogers,
Regulatory Commission, Washington, comment submission, in order to ensure
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Defense Section, Environment and Natural
DC 20555–0001. that the NRC is able to make your
For additional direction on obtaining
Resources Division. comment submission available to the
information and submitting comments,
[FR Doc. 2015–05493 Filed 3–9–15; 8:45 am] public in this docket.
see ‘‘Obtaining Information and The NRC cautions you not to include
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
Submitting Comments’’ in the identifying or contact information that
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
you do not want to be publicly
this document. disclosed in your comment submission.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The NRC posts all comment
COMMISSION
Rajender Auluck, Office of Nuclear submissions at http://
[NRC–2015–0048] Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear www.regulations.gov as well as entering
Regulatory Commission, Washington, the comment submissions into ADAMS.
Compliance With Phase 2 of Order EA– DC 20555–0001; telephone: 301–415–
13–109 The NRC does not routinely edit
1025; email: Rajender.Auluck@nrc.gov. comment submissions to remove
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: identifying or contact information.
Commission. I. Obtaining Information and If you are requesting or aggregating
ACTION: Draft interim staff guidance; Submitting Comments comments from other persons for
request for comment. submission to the NRC, then you should
A. Obtaining Information inform those persons not to include
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2015– identifying or contact information that
Commission (NRC) is issuing for public 0048 when contacting the NRC about they do not want to be publicly
comment its Japan Lessons-Learned the availability of information regarding disclosed in their comment submission.
Division (JLD) draft interim staff this document. You may obtain Your request should state that the NRC
guidance (ISG), ‘‘Compliance with publicly-available information related to does not routinely edit comment
Phase 2 of Order EA–13–109, Order this action by the following methods: submissions to remove such information
Modifying Licenses with Regard to • Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to before making the comment
Reliable Hardened Containment Vents http://www.regulations.gov and search submissions available to the public or
Capable of Operation under Severe for Docket ID NRC–2015–0048. entering the comment submissions into
Accident Conditions,’’ (JLD–ISG–2015– • NRC’s Agencywide Documents ADAMS.
01). This draft JLD–ISG would provide Access and Management System
guidance and clarification to assist II. Background
(ADAMS): You may access publicly-
nuclear power reactor licensees identify available documents online in the NRC The NRC developed draft JLD–ISG–
measures needed to comply with Phase Library at http://www.nrc.gov/reading- 2015–01 to provide guidance and
2 requirements of the ‘‘Order Modifying rm/adams.html. To begin the search, clarification to assist nuclear power
Licenses with Regard to Reliable select ‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and reactor licensees with the identification
Hardened Containment Vents Capable then select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS of methods needed to comply with
of Operation Under Severe Accident Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS, Phase 2 requirements in Order EA–13–
Conditions,’’ (Order EA–13–109) to have please contact the NRC’s Public 109, ‘‘Order Modifying Licenses with
either a vent path from the containment Document Room (PDR) reference staff at Regard to Reliable Hardened
drywell or a strategy that makes it 1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by Containment Vents Capable of
unlikely that venting would be needed email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The Operation under Severe Accident
from the drywell before alternate ADAMS accession number for each Conditions’’ (ADAMS Accession No.
reliable containment heat removal and document referenced in this notice (if ML13130A067). The draft ISG would
pressure control is reestablished. that document is available in ADAMS) not be a substitute for the requirements
DATES: Submit comments by April 9, is provided the first time that a in Order EA–13–109, and compliance
2015. Comments received after this date document is referenced. The draft JLD– with the ISG would not be a
will be considered, if it is practical to do ISG–2015–01 is available in ADAMS requirement. This ISG is being issued in
so, but the Commission is able to ensure under Accession No. ML15051A143. draft form for public comment to
consideration only for comments The ISG for complying with Phase 1 involve the public in development of
received before this date. requirements of the order (JLD–ISG– the implementing guidance.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comment 2013–02) was issued on November 14, The accident at the Fukushima Dai-
by any of the following methods (unless 2013 (ADAMS Accession No. ichi nuclear power station reinforced
this document describes a different ML13304B836). the importance of reliable operation of
method for submitting comments on a • NRC’s PDR: You may examine and containment vents for boiling-water
specific subject): purchase copies of public documents at reactor (BWR) plants with Mark I and
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One Mark II containments. As part of its
http://www.regulations.gov and search White Flint North, 11555 Rockville response to the lessons learned from the
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
for Docket ID NRC–2015–0048. Address Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. accident, on March 12, 2012, the NRC
questions about NRC dockets to Carol • NRC’s Interim Staff Guidance Web issued Order EA–12–050 (ADAMS
Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463; site: JLD–ISG documents are also Accession No. ML12056A043) requiring
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For available online under the ‘‘Japan licensees to upgrade or install a reliable
technical questions, contact the Lessons Learned’’ heading at http:// hardened containment venting system
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc- (HCVS) for Mark I and Mark II
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this collections/isg/japan-lessons- containments. The requirements in
document. learned.html. Order EA–12–050 for licensees with
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:53 Mar 09, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM 10MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_12695/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 46 / Tuesday, March 10, 2015 / Notices 12651
licensees choosing to pursue that option SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
as a strategy that makes it unlikely that COMMISSION Statement of the Purpose of, and
a licensee would need to vent from the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
drywell. [Release No. 34–74436; File No. SR– Change
On December 10, 2014, NEI submitted NYSEARCA–2015–09] 1. Purpose
NEI 13–02, ‘‘Industry Guidance for The purpose of this filing is to modify
Compliance with Order EA–13–109,’’ Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
the Exchange’s Limit on Fees on
Rev. 0E2 (ADAMS Accession No. Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Options Strategy Executions (‘‘Strategy
ML1434A374) to assist nuclear power Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Cap’’). Currently, the Exchange imposes
licensees with the identification of Rule Change Amending the NYSE Arca a Strategy Cap of $750 on transaction
measures needed to comply with the Options Fee Schedule Relating to fees for certain Strategy Executions
requirements of Order EA–13–109 Strategy Executions executed in standard option contracts
regarding reliable hardened March 4, 2015.
on the same trading day in the same
containment vents capable of operation option class. The Exchange is proposing
under severe accident conditions. The Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the to lower the $750 Strategy Cap to $700.4
NEI document includes guidance for Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the The Exchange proposes to implement
implementing order requirements for ‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3 the $700 Strategy Cap on March 1, 2015.
both Phase 1 and Phase 2, including the notice is hereby given that, on February Strategy Executions that are eligible
industry’s proposed approach to use the 24, 2015, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the for the Strategy Cap would continue to
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE Arca’’) filed with be (a) reversals and conversions, (b) box
SAWA and SAWM strategies to control
the Securities and Exchange spreads, (c) short stock interest spreads,
the water levels in the suppression pool
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the (d) merger spreads, and (e) jelly rolls. As
and maintain capabilities to address is the case today, Royalty fees associated
over-pressure conditions without a proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items with Strategy Executions on Index and
severe accident drywell vent. As Exchange Traded Funds would not be
described in the draft ISG, some issues have been prepared by the self-
included in the calculation of the
remain the subject of ongoing regulatory organization. The
Strategy Cap, but would be passed
discussions as part of finalizing the Commission is publishing this notice to
through to trading participants on the
guidance. These include: (1) solicit comments on the proposed rule Strategy Executions on a pro-rata basis.
Availability of power and functional change from interested persons. Similarly, manual Broker Dealer and
requirements for the SAWA-related I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Firm Proprietary Strategy trades that do
installed and portable equipment, (2) Statement of the Terms of Substance of not reach the $700 Strategy Cap would
duration of time for preservation of the the Proposed Rule Change continue to be billed at $0.25 per
wetwell vent for the SAWM strategy, contract.
and (3) alternate control of containment The Exchange proposes to amend the The use of these Strategy Executions
conditions during recovery from the NYSE Arca Options Fee Schedule (‘‘Fee benefits all market participants by
severe accident. The NRC intends to Schedule’’) relating to Strategy increasing liquidity in general and
continue discussions with stakeholders Executions. The Exchange proposes to allowing significant and complex
prior to finalizing the ISG for Phase 2 of implement the change on March 1, trading interest to be brought together to
2015. The text of the proposed rule enhance liquidity. By encouraging this
the order and endorsing, with
change is available on the Exchange’s type of business on the Exchange, the
clarifications and exceptions if increased liquidity benefits all market
necessary, the methodologies described Web site at www.nyse.com, at the
participants. The Exchange believes the
in the industry guidance document NEI principal office of the Exchange, and at proposed change would continue to
13–02, Rev. 0E2. the Commission’s Public Reference incentivize market participants to trade
Room. on the Exchange by capping option
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 2nd day
of March 2015. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s transaction charges related to various
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Statement of the Purpose of, and Strategy Executions.
Jack R. Davis, Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 2. Statutory Basis
Director, Japan Lessons-Learned Division, Change The Exchange believes that the
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. proposed rule change is consistent with
In its filing with the Commission, the
[FR Doc. 2015–05436 Filed 3–9–15; 8:45 am]
self-regulatory organization included Section 6(b) of the Act,5 in general, and
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
statements concerning the purpose of, furthers the objectives of Sections
6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,6 in particular,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
because it would provide for the
and discussed any comments it received
equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
on the proposed rule change. The text fees, and other charges among its
of those statements may be examined at members, issuers and other persons
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries, 4 Transaction fees on Strategy Executions are
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
set forth in sections A, B, and C below, further capped at $25,000 per month per initiating
of the most significant parts of such firm. The Exchange is not proposing to modify this
$25,000 monthly cap. Mini options are excluded
statements. from the Strategy Cap. See Fee Schedule, available
at, https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/markets/
arca-options/NYSE_Arca_Options_Fee_
1 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1). Schedule.pdf.
2 15 U.S.C. 78a. 5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:53 Mar 09, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM 10MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_12695/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-21 09:35:01
Document Modified: 2018-02-21 09:35:01
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Draft interim staff guidance; request for comment. | |
| Dates | Submit comments by April 9, 2015. Comments received after this date will be considered, if it is practical to do so, but the Commission is able to ensure consideration only for comments received before this date. | |
| Contact | Rajender Auluck, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-1025; email: [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 12649 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR