80 FR 14985 - Applications for New Awards; Jacob K. Javits Gifted and Talented Students Education Program

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 54 (March 20, 2015)

Page Range		14985-14991
FR Document		2015-06492
Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 54 (Friday, March 20, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 54 (Friday, March 20, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14985-14991]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06492]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION


Applications for New Awards; Jacob K. Javits Gifted and Talented 
Students Education Program

AGENCY: Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, Department of 
Education.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Overview Information:

    Jacob K. Javits Gifted and Talented Students Education Program.
    Notice inviting applications for new awards for fiscal year (FY) 
2015.

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 84.206A.


[[Page 14986]]


    Dates:
    Applications Available: March 20, 2015.
    Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: May 4, 2015.
    Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: July 6, 2015.

Full Text of Announcement

I. Funding Opportunity Description

    Purpose of Program: The purpose of this competition under the Jacob 
K. Javits Gifted and Talented Students Education Program (Javits) is to 
provide grants to State educational agencies (SEAs) to enable them to 
carry out a coordinated program of scientifically based research, 
demonstration projects, innovative strategies, and similar activities 
designed to build and enhance the ability of elementary and secondary 
schools nationwide to meet the special educational needs of gifted and 
talented students, particularly those from disadvantaged backgrounds or 
underrepresented groups. This grant competition implements the 
``special rule'' in section 5464(c) of the Elementary and Secondary 
Education Act of 1965, as amended (ESEA), that requires any Javits 
program funds appropriated for a fiscal year in excess of the amount of 
such funds appropriated for FY 2001 (i.e., $7.5 million) to be used to 
award competitive grants to SEAs, local educational agencies (LEAs), or 
both. Due to the limited amount of funds available, the Assistant 
Secretary has opted to award competitive grants to SEAs only for the FY 
2015 competition.
    Priority: In accordance with 34 CFR 75.105(b)(2)(iv), this priority 
is from section 5465 of the ESEA (20 U.S.C. 7253d).
    Competitive Preference Priority: For FY 2015 and any subsequent 
year in which we make awards from the list of unfunded applications 
from this competition, this priority is a competitive preference 
priority. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i), we award up to an additional 20 
points to an application that meets elements (1) and (2) of this 
priority. We award up to an additional 10 points to an application that 
meets either element (1) or element (2) of this priority.
    This priority is:
    Programs and projects designed to develop new information that:
    (1) Improves the capability of schools to plan, conduct, and 
improve programs to identify and serve gifted and talented students (up 
to 10 points); and
    (2) Assists schools in the identification of, and provision of 
services to, gifted and talented students (including economically 
disadvantaged individuals, individuals with limited English 
proficiency, and individuals with disabilities) who may not be 
identified and served through traditional assessment methods (up to 10 
points).

    Note: In accordance with section 5465(b) of the ESEA, at least 
50 percent of the applications approved under this competition must 
address element (2) above.

    Requirements: The following program and application requirements 
are from section 5464 of the ESEA (20 U.S.C. 7253c).).
    Program Requirements: Applications for funds under this program may 
propose to carry out one or more of the following activities:
    (1) Conducting scientifically based research on methods and 
techniques for identifying and teaching gifted and talented students 
and for using gifted and talented programs and methods to serve all 
students; and program evaluations, surveys, and the collection, 
analysis, and development of information needed to accomplish the 
proposed project;
    (2) Carrying out professional development (including fellowships) 
for personnel (including leadership personnel) involved in the 
education of gifted and talented students;
    (3) Establishing and operating model projects and exemplary 
programs for serving gifted and talented students, including innovative 
methods for identifying and educating students who may not be served by 
traditional gifted and talented programs (such as summer programs, 
mentoring programs, service learning programs, and cooperative programs 
involving business, industry, and education);
    (4) Implementing innovative strategies, such as cooperative 
learning, peer tutoring, and service learning;
    (5) Carrying out programs of technical assistance and information 
dissemination, including assistance and information with respect to how 
gifted and talented programs and methods, where appropriate, may be 
adapted for use by all students;
    (6) Making materials and services available through State regional 
educational service centers, institutions of higher education, or other 
entities; or
    (7) Providing funds for challenging, high-level course work, 
disseminated through technologies (including distance learning), for 
individual students or groups of students in schools and LEAs that 
would not otherwise have the resources to provide such course work.
    Application Requirements: Each SEA must describe in its application 
how:
    (1) The proposed gifted and talented services, materials, and 
methods can be adapted, if appropriate, for use by all students; and
    (2) The proposed programs can be evaluated.
    Definitions: The definitions contained in 34 CFR 77.1(c) apply to 
this competition. The Assistant Secretary is placing special emphasis 
on the definition of evidence of promise (and other relevant terms) in 
this notice for the FY 2015 grant competition and any subsequent year 
in which we make awards from the list of unfunded applications from 
this competition.
    The definitions are:
    Evidence of promise means there is empirical evidence to support 
the theoretical linkage(s) between at least one critical component and 
at least one relevant outcome presented in the logic model for the 
proposed process, product, strategy, or practice. Specifically, 
evidence of promise means the conditions in both paragraphs (i) and 
(ii) of this definition are met:
    (i) There is at least one study that is a--
    (A) Correlational study with statistical controls for selection 
bias;
    (B) Quasi-experimental design study that meets the What Works 
Clearinghouse Evidence Standards with reservations; or
    (C) Randomized controlled trial that meets the What Works 
Clearinghouse Evidence Standards with or without reservations.
    (ii) The study referenced in paragraph (ii) of this definition 
found a statistically significant or substantively important (defined 
as a difference of 0.25 standard deviations or larger) favorable 
association between at least one critical component and one relevant 
outcome presented in the logic model for the proposed process, product, 
strategy, or practice.
    Logic model (also referred to as theory of action) means well-
specified conceptual framework that identifies key components of the 
proposed process, product, strategy, or practice (i.e., the active 
``ingredients'' that are hypothesized to be critical to achieving the 
relevant outcomes) and describes the relationships among the key 
components and outcomes, theoretically and operationally.
    Quasi-experimental design study means a study using a design that 
attempts to approximate an experimental design by identifying a 
comparison group that is similar to the treatment group in important 
respects. These studies, depending on design and implementation, can 
meet What Works Clearinghouse Evidence Standards with

[[Page 14987]]

reservations (but not What Works Clearinghouse Evidence Standards 
without reservations).
    Randomized controlled trial means a study that employs random 
assignment of, for example, students, teachers, classrooms, schools, or 
districts to receive the intervention being evaluated (the treatment 
group) or not to receive the intervention (the control group). The 
estimated effectiveness of the intervention is the difference between 
the average outcomes for the treatment group and for the control group. 
These studies, depending on design and implementation, can meet What 
Works Clearinghouse Evidence Standards without reservations.
    Relevant outcome means the student outcome(s) (or the ultimate 
outcome if not related to students) the proposed process, product, 
strategy, or practice is designed to improve; consistent with the 
specific goals of a program.
    What Works Clearinghouse Evidence Standards means the standards set 
forth in the What Works Clearinghouse Procedures and Standards Handbook 
(Version 3.0, March 2014), which can be found at the following link: 
http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/DocumentSum.aspx?sid=19.
    Program Authority: Title V, part D, subpart 6 of the ESEA (20 
U.S.C. 7253-7253e).
    Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General 
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 81, 82, 
84, 86, 97, 98, and 99. (b) The OMB Guidelines to Agencies on 
Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) in 2 CFR part 
180, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR 
part 3485. (c) The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost 
Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part 
200, as adopted and amended in 2 CFR part 3474. (d) The regulations in 
34 CFR part 299.

II. Award Information

    Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
    Estimated Available Funds: $2,500,000.
    Contingent upon the availability of funds and the quality of 
applications, we may make additional awards in FY 2016 from the list of 
unfunded applicants from this competition.
    Estimated Range of Awards: $250,000-$400,000.
    Estimated Average Size of Awards: $350,000.
    Estimated Number of Awards: 6-10.

    Note:  The Department is not bound by any estimates in this 
notice.

    Project Period: Up to 36 months.

III. Eligibility Information

    1. Eligible Applicants: SEAs.

    Note:  Under the ``special rule'' in section 5464(c) of the 
ESEA, the Assistant Secretary is authorized to award funds to SEAs, 
LEAs, or both. For FY 2015, the competitive grants made under this 
competition will be made to SEAs only.

    2. Cost Sharing or Matching: This competition does not require cost 
sharing or matching.
    3. Other:
    a. Participation of Private School Children and Teachers. 
Applications for funds under Javits must provide for the equitable 
participation of students and teachers in private nonprofit elementary 
and secondary schools, including teachers and other personnel in 
professional development programs serving such students, located in 
areas served by the grant recipient.
    b. Administrative Direction and Control. Administrative direction 
and control over grant funds must remain with the grantee.

IV. Application and Submission Information

    1. Address to Request Application Package: You can obtain an 
application package via the Internet or from the Education Publications 
Center (ED Pubs).
    To obtain a copy via the Internet, use the following address: 
www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/grantapps/index.html. To obtain a copy from 
ED Pubs, write, fax, or call the following: ED Pubs, U.S. Department of 
Education, P.O. Box 22207, Alexandria, VA 22304. Telephone, toll free: 
1-877-433-7827. FAX: (703) 605-6794. If you use a telecommunications 
device for the deaf (TDD) or a text telephone (TTY), call, toll free: 
1-877-576-7734.
    You can contact ED Pubs at its Web site, also: www.EDPubs.gov or at 
its email address: edpubs@inet.ed.gov.
    If you request an application from ED Pubs, be sure to identify 
this competition as follows: CFDA number 84.206A.
    Individuals with disabilities can obtain a copy of the application 
package in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, 
or compact disc) by contacting the person listed under Accessible 
Format in section VIII of this notice.
    2. Content and Form of Application Submission: Requirements 
concerning the content of an application, together with the forms you 
must submit, are in the application package for this competition.
    Page Limit: The application narrative is where you, the applicant, 
provide the project narrative and management plan to address the 
selection criteria that reviewers use to evaluate your application. The 
required budget and budget narrative will be provided in a separate 
section. You must limit the application narrative to the equivalent of 
no more than 50 pages, using the following standards:
     A ``page'' is 8.5 x 11, on one side 
only, with 1 margins at the top, bottom, and both sides.
    [ensp x  x  x 
 x ]Double space (no more than three lines per vertical inch) all text 
in the application narrative, including titles, headings, footnotes, 
quotations, references, and captions, as well as all text in charts, 
tables, figures, and graphs.
     Use a font that is either 12 point or larger or no smaller 
than 10 pitch (characters per inch).
     Use one of the following fonts: Times New Roman, Courier, 
Courier New, or Arial.
    The page limit does not apply to the cover sheet; the budget 
section, including the narrative budget justification; the assurances 
and certifications; or the one-page abstract, the resumes, the 
bibliography, or the letters of support. However, the page limit does 
apply to all of the application narrative section.
    Our reviewers will not read any pages of your application that 
exceed the page limit.
    3. Submission Dates and Times:
    Applications Available: March 20, 2015.
    Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: May 4, 2015.
    Applications for grants under this competition must be submitted 
electronically using the Grants.gov Apply site (Grants.gov). For 
information (including dates and times) about how to submit your 
application electronically, or in paper format by mail or hand delivery 
if you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission 
requirement, please refer to section IV. 7. Other Submission 
Requirements of this notice.
    We do not consider an application that does not comply with the 
deadline requirements.
    Individuals with disabilities who need an accommodation or 
auxiliary aid in connection with the application process should contact 
the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT in section VII 
of this notice. If the Department provides an accommodation or 
auxiliary aid to an individual with a disability in connection with the 
application process, the individual's application remains subject to 
all other

[[Page 14988]]

requirements and limitations in this notice.
    Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: July 6, 2015.
    4. Intergovernmental Review: This competition is subject to 
Executive Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. 
Information about Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs under 
Executive Order 12372 is in the application package for this 
competition.
    5. Funding Restrictions: We reference regulations outlining funding 
restrictions in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice.
    6. Data Universal Numbering System Number, Taxpayer Identification 
Number, and System for Award Management: To do business with the 
Department of Education, you must--
    a. Have a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number and a 
Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN);
    b. Register both your DUNS number and TIN with the System for Award 
Management (SAM) (formerly the Central Contractor Registry (CCR)), the 
Government's primary registrant database;
    c. Provide your DUNS number and TIN on the application; and
    d. Maintain an active SAM registration with current information 
while your application is under review by the Department and, if you 
are awarded a grant, during the project period.
    You can obtain a DUNS number from Dun and Bradstreet. A DUNS number 
can be created within one to two business days.
    If you are a corporate entity, agency, institution, or 
organization, you can obtain a TIN from the Internal Revenue Service. 
If you are an individual, you can obtain a TIN from the Internal 
Revenue Service or the Social Security Administration. If you need a 
new TIN, please allow 2-5 weeks for your TIN to become active.
    The SAM registration process can take approximately seven business 
days, but may take upwards of several weeks, depending on the 
completeness and accuracy of the data entered into the SAM database by 
an entity. Thus, if you think you might want to apply for Federal 
financial assistance under a program administered by the Department, 
please allow sufficient time to obtain and register your DUNS number 
and TIN. We strongly recommend that you register early.

    Note:  Once your SAM registration is active, you will need to 
allow 24 to 48 hours for the information to be available in 
Grants.gov before you can submit an application through Grants.gov.

    If you are currently registered with SAM, you may not need to make 
any changes. However, please make certain that the TIN associated with 
your DUNS number is correct. Also, note that you will need to update 
your registration annually. This may take three or more business days.
    Information about SAM is available at www.SAM.gov. To further 
assist you with obtaining and registering your DUNS number and TIN in 
SAM or updating your existing SAM account, we have prepared a SAM.gov 
Tip Sheet, which you can find at: www2.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/sam-faqs.html.
    In addition, if you are submitting your application via Grants.gov, 
you must (1) be designated by your organization as an Authorized 
Organization Representative (AOR); and (2) register yourself with 
Grants.gov as an AOR. Details on these steps are outlined at the 
following Grants.gov Web page: www.grants.gov/web/grants/register.html.
    7. Other Submission Requirements:
    Applications for grants under this competition must be submitted 
electronically unless you qualify for an exception to this requirement 
in accordance with the instructions in this section.
    a. Electronic Submission of Applications.
    Applications for grants under Javits, CFDA number 84.206A, must be 
submitted electronically using the Governmentwide Grants.gov Apply 
site. Through this site, you will be able to download a copy of the 
application package, complete it offline, and then upload and submit 
your application. You may not email an electronic copy of a grant 
application to us.
    We will reject your application if you submit it in paper format 
unless, as described elsewhere in this section, you qualify for one of 
the exceptions to the electronic submission requirement and submit, no 
later than two weeks before the application deadline date, a written 
statement to the Department that you qualify for one of these 
exceptions. Further information regarding calculation of the date that 
is two weeks before the application deadline date is provided later in 
this section under Exception to Electronic Submission Requirement.
    You may access the electronic grant application for Javits at 
www.Grants.gov. You must search for the downloadable application 
package for this competition by the CFDA number. Do not include the 
CFDA number's alpha suffix in your search (e.g., search for 84.206, not 
84.206A).
    Please note the following:
     When you enter the Grants.gov site, you will find 
information about submitting an application electronically through the 
site, as well as the hours of operation.
     Applications received by Grants.gov are date and time 
stamped. Your application must be fully uploaded and submitted and must 
be date and time stamped by the Grants.gov system no later than 4:30:00 
p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date. Except as 
otherwise noted in this section, we will not accept your application if 
it is received--that is, date and time stamped by the Grants.gov 
system--after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application 
deadline date. Except as otherwise noted in this section, we will not 
accept your application if it is received--that is, date and time 
stamped by the Grants.gov system--after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC 
time, on the application deadline date. We do not consider an 
application that does not comply with the deadline requirements. When 
we retrieve your application from Grants.gov, we will notify you if we 
are rejecting your application because it was date and time stamped by 
the Grants.gov system after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the 
application deadline date.
     The amount of time it can take to upload an application 
will vary depending on a variety of factors, including the size of the 
application and the speed of your Internet connection. Therefore, we 
strongly recommend that you do not wait until the application deadline 
date to begin the submission process through Grants.gov.
     You should review and follow the Education Submission 
Procedures for submitting an application through Grants.gov that are 
included in the application package for this competition to ensure that 
you submit your application in a timely manner to the Grants.gov 
system. You also can find the Education Submission Procedures 
pertaining to Grants.gov under News and Events on the Department's G5 
system home page at www.G5.gov.
     You will not receive additional point value because you 
submit your application in electronic format, nor will we penalize you 
if you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission 
requirement, as described elsewhere in this section, and submit your 
application in paper format.
     You must submit all documents electronically, including 
all information you typically provide on the following forms: the 
Application for Federal Assistance (SF 424), the Department of 
Education Supplemental Information for SF 424, Budget Information--Non-

[[Page 14989]]

Construction Programs (ED 524), and all necessary assurances and 
certifications.
     You must upload any narrative section and all other 
attachments to your application as files in a PDF (Portable Document) 
read-only, non-modifiable format. Do not upload an interactive or 
fillable PDF file. If you upload a file type other than a read-only, 
non-modifiable PDF or submit a password-protected file, we will not 
review that material. Additional, detailed information on how to attach 
files is in the application instructions.
     Your electronic application must comply with any page-
limit requirements described in this notice.
     After you electronically submit your application, you will 
receive from Grants.gov an automatic notification of receipt that 
contains a Grants.gov tracking number. (This notification indicates 
receipt by Grants.gov only, not receipt by the Department.) The 
Department then will retrieve your application from Grants.gov and send 
a second notification to you by email. This second notification 
indicates that the Department has received your application and has 
assigned your application a PR/Award number (an ED-specified 
identifying number unique to your application).
     We may request that you provide us original signatures on 
forms at a later date.
    Application Deadline Date Extension in Case of Technical Issues 
with the Grants.gov System: If you are experiencing problems submitting 
your application through Grants.gov, please contact the Grants.gov 
Support Desk, toll free, at 1-800-518-4726. You must obtain a 
Grants.gov Support Desk Case Number and must keep a record of it.
    If you are prevented from electronically submitting your 
application on the application deadline date because of technical 
problems with the Grants.gov system, we will grant you an extension 
until 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, the following business day to 
enable you to transmit your application electronically or by hand 
delivery. You also may mail your application by following the mailing 
instructions described elsewhere in this notice.
    If you submit an application after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC 
time, on the application deadline date, please contact the person 
listed under For Further Information Contact in section VII of this 
notice and provide an explanation of the technical problem you 
experienced with Grants.gov, along with the Grants.gov Support Desk 
Case Number. We will accept your application if we can confirm that a 
technical problem occurred with the Grants.gov system and that that 
problem affected your ability to submit your application by 4:30:00 
p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date. The 
Department will contact you after a determination is made on whether 
your application will be accepted.

    Note:  The extensions to which we refer in this section apply 
only to the unavailability of, or technical problems with, the 
Grants.gov system. We will not grant you an extension if you failed 
to fully register to submit your application to Grants.gov before 
the application deadline date and time or if the technical problem 
you experienced is unrelated to the Grants.gov system.

    Exception to Electronic Submission Requirement: You qualify for an 
exception to the electronic submission requirement, and may submit your 
application in paper format, if you are unable to submit an application 
through the Grants.gov system because--
     You do not have access to the Internet; or
     You do not have the capacity to upload large documents to 
the Grants.gov system;

and

     No later than two weeks before the application deadline 
date (14 calendar days or, if the fourteenth calendar day before the 
application deadline date falls on a Federal holiday, the next business 
day following the Federal holiday), you mail or fax a written statement 
to the Department, explaining which of the two grounds for an exception 
prevents you from using the Internet to submit your application.
    If you mail your written statement to the Department, it must be 
postmarked no later than two weeks before the application deadline 
date. If you fax your written statement to the Department, we must 
receive the faxed statement no later than two weeks before the 
application deadline date.
    Address and email or fax your statement to: Jennifer Brianas, U.S. 
Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Room 3E220, 
Washington, DC 20202-6450. FAX: (202) 205-4921.
    Your paper application must be submitted in accordance with the 
mail or hand delivery instructions described in this notice.
    b. Submission of Paper Applications by Mail.
    If you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission 
requirement, you may mail (through the U.S. Postal Service or a 
commercial carrier) your application to the Department. You must mail 
the original and two copies of your application, on or before the 
application deadline date, to the Department at the following address: 
U.S. Department of Education, Application Control Center, Attention: 
(CFDA Number 84.206A), LBJ Basement Level 1, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., 
Washington, DC 20202-4260.
    You must show proof of mailing consisting of one of the following:
    (1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service postmark.
    (2) A legible mail receipt with the date of mailing stamped by the 
U.S. Postal Service.
    (3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or receipt from a commercial 
carrier.
    (4) Any other proof of mailing acceptable to the Secretary of the 
U.S. Department of Education.
    If you mail your application through the U.S. Postal Service, we do 
not accept either of the following as proof of mailing:
    (1) A private metered postmark.
    (2) A mail receipt that is not dated by the U.S. Postal Service.
    If your application is postmarked after the application deadline 
date, we will not consider your application.

    Note:  The U.S. Postal Service does not uniformly provide a 
dated postmark. Before relying on this method, you should check with 
your local post office.

    c. Submission of Paper Applications by Hand Delivery.
    If you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission 
requirement, you (or a courier service) may deliver your paper 
application to the Department by hand. You must deliver the original 
and two copies of your application by hand, on or before the 
application deadline date, to the Department at the following address: 
U.S. Department of Education, Application Control Center, Attention: 
(CFDA Number 84.206A), 550 12th Street SW., Room 7039, Potomac Center 
Plaza, Washington, DC 20202-4260.
    The Application Control Center accepts hand deliveries daily 
between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, except 
Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal holidays.
    Note for Mail or Hand Delivery of Paper Applications: If you mail 
or hand deliver your applications to the Department--
    (1) You must indicate on the envelope and--if not provided by the 
Department--in Item 11 of the SF 424 the CFDA number, including suffix 
letter, if any, of the competition under which you are submitting your 
application; and
    (2) The Application Control Center will mail to you a notification 
of receipt of your grant application. If you do not receive this 
notification within 15

[[Page 14990]]

business days from the application deadline date, you should call the 
U.S. Department of Education Application Control Center at (202) 245-
6288.

V. Application Review Information

    1. Selection Criteria: The selection criteria for this competition 
are from 34 CFR 75.210 of EDGAR. The maximum score for all selection 
criteria is 150, and the maximum possible score for each selection 
criterion is indicated in parentheses. The selection criteria for this 
competition are as follows:
    (a) Need for project (30 points). The Secretary considers the need 
for the proposed project. In determining the need for the proposed 
project, the Secretary considers the following factors:
    (i) The magnitude of the need for the services to be provided or 
the activities to be carried out by the proposed project (10 points).
    (ii) The extent to which the proposed project will focus on serving 
or otherwise address the needs of disadvantage individuals (10 points).
    (iii) The extent to which specific gaps or weaknesses in services, 
infrastructure, or opportunities have been identified and will be 
addressed by the proposed project, including the nature and magnitude 
of those gaps or weaknesses (10 points).
    (b) Quality of the project design (40 points). The Secretary 
considers the quality of the design of the proposed project. In 
determining the quality of the design of the proposed project, the 
Secretary considers the following factors:
    (i) The extent to which the goals, objectives, and outcomes to be 
achieved by the proposed project are clearly specified and measurable 
(10 points).
    (ii) The extent to which the design of the proposed project is 
appropriate to, and will successfully address, the needs of the target 
population or other identified needs (10 points).
    (iii) The extent to which the proposed project is designed to build 
capacity and yield results that will extend beyond the period of 
Federal financial assistance (10 points).
    (iv) The extent to which the proposed project is supported by 
evidence of promise (10 points).
    (c) Quality of project personnel (20 points). The Secretary 
considers the quality of the personnel who will carry out the proposed 
project. In determining the quality of project personnel, the Secretary 
considers the extent to which the applicant encourages applications for 
employment from persons who are members of groups that have 
traditionally been underrepresented based on race, color, national 
origin, gender, age, or disability. In addition, the Secretary 
considers the following factors:
    (i) The qualifications, including relevant training and experience, 
of the project director or principal investigator (10 points).
    (ii) The qualifications, including relevant training and 
experience, of key project personnel (10 points).
    (d) Quality of the management plan (30 points). The Secretary 
considers the quality of the management plan for the proposed project. 
In determining the quality of the management plan for the proposed 
project, the Secretary considers the following factors:
    (i) The adequacy of the management plan to achieve the objectives 
of the proposed project on time and within budget, including clearly 
defined responsibilities, timelines, and milestones for accomplishing 
project tasks (15 points).
    (ii) The extent to which the time commitments of the project 
director and principal investigator and other key project personnel are 
appropriate and adequate to meet the objectives of the proposed project 
(15 points).
    (e) Quality of the project evaluation (30 points). The Secretary 
considers the quality of the evaluation to be conducted of the proposed 
project. In determining the quality of the evaluation, the Secretary 
considers the following factors:
    (i) The extent to which the methods of evaluation are thorough, 
feasible, and appropriate to the goals, objectives, and outcomes of the 
proposed project (10 points).
    (ii) The extent to which the methods of evaluation include the use 
of objective performance measures that are clearly related to the 
intended outcomes of the project and will produce quantitative and 
qualitative data to the extent possible (10 points).
    (iii) The extent to which the methods of evaluation will, if well-
implemented, produce evidence of promise (10 points).
    2. Review and Selection Process: We remind potential applicants 
that in reviewing applications in any discretionary grant competition, 
the Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR 75.217(d)(3), the past 
performance of the applicant in carrying out a previous award, such as 
the applicant's use of funds, achievement of project objectives, and 
compliance with grant conditions. The Secretary may also consider 
whether the applicant failed to submit a timely performance report or 
submitted a report of unacceptable quality.
    In addition, in making a competitive grant award, the Secretary 
also requires various assurances, including those applicable to Federal 
civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or 
activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department 
of Education (34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
    An additional factor we will consider in selecting an application 
for an award is the requirement in section 5465(b) of the ESEA (20 
U.S.C. 7253d(b)). Under this section, the Assistant Secretary must 
ensure that no less than 50 percent of the applications approved under 
this competition address element (2) of the competitive preference 
priority in this notice.
    3. Special Conditions: Under 2 CFR 3474.10, the Secretary may 
impose special conditions and, in appropriate circumstances, high-risk 
conditions on a grant if the applicant or grantee is not financially 
stable; has a history of unsatisfactory performance; has a financial or 
other management system that does not meet the standards in 2 CFR part 
200, subpart D; has not fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant; or 
is otherwise not responsible.

VI. Award Administration Information

    1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your 
U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award 
Notification (GAN); or we may send you an email containing a link to 
access an electronic version of your GAN. We may notify you informally, 
also.
    If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding, 
we notify you.
    2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify 
administrative and national policy requirements in the application 
package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable 
Regulations section of this notice.
    We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of 
an award in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice and 
include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also 
incorporates your approved application as part of your binding 
commitments under the grant.
    3. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a grant under this competition, 
you must ensure that you have in place the necessary processes and 
systems to comply with the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 170 
should you receive funding under the competition. This does not apply 
if you have an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
    (b) At the end of your project period, you must submit a final 
performance

[[Page 14991]]

report, including financial information, as directed by the Secretary. 
If you receive a multi-year award, you must submit an annual 
performance report that provides the most current performance and 
financial expenditure information as directed by the Secretary under 34 
CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more frequent performance 
reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific requirements on reporting, 
please go to www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.
    4. Performance Measure: The Department has established the 
following Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 performance 
measure for Javits: The percentage of Javits projects with professional 
development activities focusing on the teaching and learning of gifted 
and talented students deemed to be of high quality by an expert panel.
    5. Continuation Awards: In making a continuation award under 34 CFR 
75.253, the Secretary considers, among other things: Whether a grantee 
has made substantial progress in achieving the goals and objectives of 
the project; whether the grantee has expended funds in a manner that is 
consistent with its approved application and budget; and, if the 
Secretary has established performance measurement requirements, the 
performance targets in the grantee's approved application. In making a 
continuation grant, the Secretary also considers whether the grantee is 
operating in compliance with the assurances in its approved 
application, including those applicable to Federal civil rights laws 
that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities receiving 
Federal financial assistance from the Department (34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 
106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).

VII. Agency Contact

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Brianas, U.S. Department of 
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Room 3E220, Washington, DC 20202-
6450. Telephone: (202) 401-0299 or by email: Jennifer.Brianas@ed.gov.
    If you use a TDD or a TTY, call the Federal Relay Service, toll 
free, at 1-800-877-8339.

VIII. Other Information

    Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this 
document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format 
(e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc) on request to 
the program contact person listed under For Further Information Contact 
in section VII of this notice.
    Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this 
document is the document published in the Federal Register. Free 
Internet access to the official edition of the Federal Register and the 
Code of Federal Regulations is available via the Federal Digital System 
at: www.thefederalregister.org/fdsys. At this site you can view this document, as well 
as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal 
Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF). To use PDF 
you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at this 
site.
    You may also access documents of the Department published in the 
Federal Register by using the article search feature at: 
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search 
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published 
by the Department.

    Dated: March 17, 2015.
Deborah S. Delisle,
Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education.
[FR Doc. 2015-06492 Filed 3-19-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
14986 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 54 / Friday, March 20, 2015 / Notices

Dates: (including economically disadvantaged (1) The proposed gifted and talented
Applications Available: March 20, individuals, individuals with limited services, materials, and methods can be
2015. English proficiency, and individuals adapted, if appropriate, for use by all
Deadline for Transmittal of with disabilities) who may not be students; and
Applications: May 4, 2015. identified and served through (2) The proposed programs can be
Deadline for Intergovernmental traditional assessment methods (up to evaluated.
Review: July 6, 2015. 10 points). Definitions: The definitions contained
Note: In accordance with section 5465(b) of in 34 CFR 77.1(c) apply to this
Full Text of Announcement competition. The Assistant Secretary is
the ESEA, at least 50 percent of the
I. Funding Opportunity Description applications approved under this placing special emphasis on the
Purpose of Program: The purpose of competition must address element (2) above. definition of evidence of promise (and
this competition under the Jacob K. Requirements: The following program other relevant terms) in this notice for
Javits Gifted and Talented Students and application requirements are from the FY 2015 grant competition and any
Education Program (Javits) is to provide section 5464 of the ESEA (20 U.S.C. subsequent year in which we make
grants to State educational agencies 7253c).). awards from the list of unfunded
(SEAs) to enable them to carry out a Program Requirements: Applications applications from this competition.
for funds under this program may The definitions are:
coordinated program of scientifically Evidence of promise means there is
based research, demonstration projects, propose to carry out one or more of the
following activities: empirical evidence to support the
innovative strategies, and similar theoretical linkage(s) between at least
activities designed to build and enhance (1) Conducting scientifically based
research on methods and techniques for one critical component and at least one
the ability of elementary and secondary relevant outcome presented in the logic
schools nationwide to meet the special identifying and teaching gifted and
talented students and for using gifted model for the proposed process,
educational needs of gifted and talented product, strategy, or practice.
students, particularly those from and talented programs and methods to
serve all students; and program Specifically, evidence of promise means
disadvantaged backgrounds or the conditions in both paragraphs (i)
underrepresented groups. This grant evaluations, surveys, and the collection,
analysis, and development of and (ii) of this definition are met:
competition implements the ‘‘special (i) There is at least one study that is
rule’’ in section 5464(c) of the information needed to accomplish the
proposed project; a—
Elementary and Secondary Education (A) Correlational study with statistical
(2) Carrying out professional
Act of 1965, as amended (ESEA), that controls for selection bias;
development (including fellowships) for
requires any Javits program funds (B) Quasi-experimental design study
personnel (including leadership
appropriated for a fiscal year in excess that meets the What Works
personnel) involved in the education of
of the amount of such funds Clearinghouse Evidence Standards with
gifted and talented students;
appropriated for FY 2001 (i.e., $7.5 (3) Establishing and operating model reservations; or
million) to be used to award competitive projects and exemplary programs for (C) Randomized controlled trial that
grants to SEAs, local educational serving gifted and talented students, meets the What Works Clearinghouse
agencies (LEAs), or both. Due to the including innovative methods for Evidence Standards with or without
limited amount of funds available, the identifying and educating students who reservations.
Assistant Secretary has opted to award may not be served by traditional gifted (ii) The study referenced in paragraph
competitive grants to SEAs only for the and talented programs (such as summer (ii) of this definition found a statistically
FY 2015 competition. programs, mentoring programs, service significant or substantively important
Priority: In accordance with 34 CFR learning programs, and cooperative (defined as a difference of 0.25 standard
75.105(b)(2)(iv), this priority is from programs involving business, industry, deviations or larger) favorable
section 5465 of the ESEA (20 U.S.C. and education); association between at least one critical
7253d). (4) Implementing innovative component and one relevant outcome
Competitive Preference Priority: For strategies, such as cooperative learning, presented in the logic model for the
FY 2015 and any subsequent year in peer tutoring, and service learning; proposed process, product, strategy, or
which we make awards from the list of (5) Carrying out programs of technical practice.
unfunded applications from this assistance and information Logic model (also referred to as theory
competition, this priority is a dissemination, including assistance and of action) means well-specified
competitive preference priority. Under information with respect to how gifted conceptual framework that identifies
34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i), we award up to and talented programs and methods, key components of the proposed
an additional 20 points to an where appropriate, may be adapted for process, product, strategy, or practice
application that meets elements (1) and use by all students; (i.e., the active ‘‘ingredients’’ that are
(2) of this priority. We award up to an (6) Making materials and services hypothesized to be critical to achieving
additional 10 points to an application available through State regional the relevant outcomes) and describes
that meets either element (1) or element educational service centers, institutions the relationships among the key
(2) of this priority. of higher education, or other entities; or components and outcomes, theoretically
This priority is: (7) Providing funds for challenging, and operationally.
Programs and projects designed to high-level course work, disseminated Quasi-experimental design study
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

develop new information that: through technologies (including means a study using a design that
(1) Improves the capability of schools distance learning), for individual attempts to approximate an
to plan, conduct, and improve programs students or groups of students in experimental design by identifying a
to identify and serve gifted and talented schools and LEAs that would not comparison group that is similar to the
students (up to 10 points); and otherwise have the resources to provide treatment group in important respects.
(2) Assists schools in the such course work. These studies, depending on design and
identification of, and provision of Application Requirements: Each SEA implementation, can meet What Works
services to, gifted and talented students must describe in its application how: Clearinghouse Evidence Standards with

VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:14 Mar 19, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00082 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20MRN1.SGM 20MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 54 / Friday, March 20, 2015 / Notices 14987

reservations (but not What Works III. Eligibility Information project narrative and management plan
Clearinghouse Evidence Standards 1. Eligible Applicants: SEAs. to address the selection criteria that
without reservations). reviewers use to evaluate your
Randomized controlled trial means a Note: Under the ‘‘special rule’’ in section application. The required budget and
study that employs random assignment 5464(c) of the ESEA, the Assistant Secretary
budget narrative will be provided in a
is authorized to award funds to SEAs, LEAs,
of, for example, students, teachers, separate section. You must limit the
or both. For FY 2015, the competitive grants
classrooms, schools, or districts to made under this competition will be made to application narrative to the equivalent
receive the intervention being evaluated SEAs only. of no more than 50 pages, using the
(the treatment group) or not to receive following standards:
the intervention (the control group). The 2. Cost Sharing or Matching: This • A ‘‘page’’ is 8.5″ x 11″, on one side
estimated effectiveness of the competition does not require cost only, with 1″ margins at the top, bottom,
intervention is the difference between sharing or matching. and both sides.
the average outcomes for the treatment 3. Other: • Double space (no more than three
group and for the control group. These a. Participation of Private School lines per vertical inch) all text in the
studies, depending on design and Children and Teachers. Applications for application narrative, including titles,
implementation, can meet What Works funds under Javits must provide for the headings, footnotes, quotations,
Clearinghouse Evidence Standards equitable participation of students and references, and captions, as well as all
without reservations. teachers in private nonprofit elementary text in charts, tables, figures, and
Relevant outcome means the student and secondary schools, including graphs.
outcome(s) (or the ultimate outcome if teachers and other personnel in • Use a font that is either 12 point or
not related to students) the proposed professional development programs larger or no smaller than 10 pitch
process, product, strategy, or practice is serving such students, located in areas (characters per inch).
designed to improve; consistent with served by the grant recipient. • Use one of the following fonts:
the specific goals of a program. b. Administrative Direction and Times New Roman, Courier, Courier
What Works Clearinghouse Evidence Control. Administrative direction and New, or Arial.
Standards means the standards set forth control over grant funds must remain The page limit does not apply to the
in the What Works Clearinghouse with the grantee. cover sheet; the budget section,
Procedures and Standards Handbook IV. Application and Submission including the narrative budget
(Version 3.0, March 2014), which can be Information justification; the assurances and
found at the following link: http:// certifications; or the one-page abstract,
ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/ 1. Address to Request Application the resumes, the bibliography, or the
DocumentSum.aspx?sid=19. Package: You can obtain an application letters of support. However, the page
Program Authority: Title V, part D, package via the Internet or from the limit does apply to all of the application
subpart 6 of the ESEA (20 U.S.C. 7253– Education Publications Center (ED narrative section.
7253e). Pubs). Our reviewers will not read any pages
Applicable Regulations: (a) The To obtain a copy via the Internet, use of your application that exceed the page
Education Department General the following address: www.ed.gov/ limit.
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in fund/grant/apply/grantapps/index.html. 3. Submission Dates and Times:
34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84, 86, To obtain a copy from ED Pubs, write, Applications Available: March 20,
97, 98, and 99. (b) The OMB Guidelines fax, or call the following: ED Pubs, U.S. 2015.
to Agencies on Governmentwide Department of Education, P.O. Box Deadline for Transmittal of
Debarment and Suspension 22207, Alexandria, VA 22304. Applications: May 4, 2015.
(Nonprocurement) in 2 CFR part 180, as Telephone, toll free: 1–877–433–7827. Applications for grants under this
adopted and amended as regulations of FAX: (703) 605–6794. If you use a competition must be submitted
the Department in 2 CFR part 3485. (c) telecommunications device for the deaf electronically using the Grants.gov
The Uniform Administrative (TDD) or a text telephone (TTY), call, Apply site (Grants.gov). For information
Requirements, Cost Principles, and toll free: 1–877–576–7734. (including dates and times) about how
Audit Requirements for Federal Awards You can contact ED Pubs at its Web to submit your application
in 2 CFR part 200, as adopted and site, also: www.EDPubs.gov or at its electronically, or in paper format by
amended in 2 CFR part 3474. (d) The email address: edpubs@inet.ed.gov. mail or hand delivery if you qualify for
regulations in 34 CFR part 299. If you request an application from ED an exception to the electronic
Pubs, be sure to identify this submission requirement, please refer to
II. Award Information
competition as follows: CFDA number section IV. 7. Other Submission
Type of Award: Discretionary grants. 84.206A. Requirements of this notice.
Estimated Available Funds: Individuals with disabilities can We do not consider an application
$2,500,000. obtain a copy of the application package that does not comply with the deadline
Contingent upon the availability of in an accessible format (e.g., braille, requirements.
funds and the quality of applications, large print, audiotape, or compact disc) Individuals with disabilities who
we may make additional awards in FY by contacting the person listed under need an accommodation or auxiliary aid
2016 from the list of unfunded Accessible Format in section VIII of this in connection with the application
applicants from this competition. notice. process should contact the person listed
Estimated Range of Awards:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

2. Content and Form of Application under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
$250,000–$400,000. Submission: Requirements concerning CONTACT in section VII of this notice. If
Estimated Average Size of Awards: the content of an application, together the Department provides an
$350,000. with the forms you must submit, are in accommodation or auxiliary aid to an
Estimated Number of Awards: 6–10.
the application package for this individual with a disability in
Note: The Department is not bound by any competition. connection with the application
estimates in this notice. Page Limit: The application narrative process, the individual’s application
Project Period: Up to 36 months. is where you, the applicant, provide the remains subject to all other

VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:14 Mar 19, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00083 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20MRN1.SGM 20MRN1
14990 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 54 / Friday, March 20, 2015 / Notices

business days from the application based on race, color, national origin, In addition, in making a competitive
deadline date, you should call the U.S. gender, age, or disability. In addition, grant award, the Secretary also requires
Department of Education Application the Secretary considers the following various assurances, including those
Control Center at (202) 245–6288. factors: applicable to Federal civil rights laws
(i) The qualifications, including that prohibit discrimination in programs
V. Application Review Information relevant training and experience, of the or activities receiving Federal financial
1. Selection Criteria: The selection project director or principal investigator assistance from the Department of
criteria for this competition are from 34 (10 points). Education (34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4,
CFR 75.210 of EDGAR. The maximum (ii) The qualifications, including 108.8, and 110.23).
score for all selection criteria is 150, and relevant training and experience, of key An additional factor we will consider
the maximum possible score for each project personnel (10 points). in selecting an application for an award
selection criterion is indicated in (d) Quality of the management plan is the requirement in section 5465(b) of
parentheses. The selection criteria for (30 points). The Secretary considers the the ESEA (20 U.S.C. 7253d(b)). Under
this competition are as follows: quality of the management plan for the this section, the Assistant Secretary
(a) Need for project (30 points). The proposed project. In determining the must ensure that no less than 50 percent
Secretary considers the need for the quality of the management plan for the of the applications approved under this
proposed project. In determining the proposed project, the Secretary competition address element (2) of the
need for the proposed project, the considers the following factors: competitive preference priority in this
Secretary considers the following (i) The adequacy of the management notice.
factors: plan to achieve the objectives of the 3. Special Conditions: Under 2 CFR
(i) The magnitude of the need for the proposed project on time and within 3474.10, the Secretary may impose
services to be provided or the activities budget, including clearly defined special conditions and, in appropriate
to be carried out by the proposed project responsibilities, timelines, and circumstances, high-risk conditions on a
(10 points). milestones for accomplishing project grant if the applicant or grantee is not
(ii) The extent to which the proposed tasks (15 points). financially stable; has a history of
project will focus on serving or (ii) The extent to which the time unsatisfactory performance; has a
otherwise address the needs of commitments of the project director and financial or other management system
disadvantage individuals (10 points). principal investigator and other key that does not meet the standards in 2
(iii) The extent to which specific gaps project personnel are appropriate and CFR part 200, subpart D; has not
or weaknesses in services, adequate to meet the objectives of the fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant;
infrastructure, or opportunities have proposed project (15 points). or is otherwise not responsible.
been identified and will be addressed by (e) Quality of the project evaluation
the proposed project, including the (30 points). The Secretary considers the VI. Award Administration Information
nature and magnitude of those gaps or quality of the evaluation to be 1. Award Notices: If your application
weaknesses (10 points). conducted of the proposed project. In is successful, we notify your U.S.
(b) Quality of the project design (40 determining the quality of the Representative and U.S. Senators and
points). The Secretary considers the evaluation, the Secretary considers the send you a Grant Award Notification
quality of the design of the proposed following factors: (GAN); or we may send you an email
project. In determining the quality of the (i) The extent to which the methods containing a link to access an electronic
design of the proposed project, the of evaluation are thorough, feasible, and version of your GAN. We may notify
Secretary considers the following appropriate to the goals, objectives, and you informally, also.
factors: outcomes of the proposed project (10 If your application is not evaluated or
(i) The extent to which the goals, points). not selected for funding, we notify you.
objectives, and outcomes to be achieved (ii) The extent to which the methods 2. Administrative and National Policy
by the proposed project are clearly of evaluation include the use of Requirements: We identify
specified and measurable (10 points). objective performance measures that are administrative and national policy
(ii) The extent to which the design of clearly related to the intended outcomes requirements in the application package
the proposed project is appropriate to, of the project and will produce and reference these and other
and will successfully address, the needs quantitative and qualitative data to the requirements in the Applicable
of the target population or other extent possible (10 points). Regulations section of this notice.
identified needs (10 points). (iii) The extent to which the methods We reference the regulations outlining
(iii) The extent to which the proposed of evaluation will, if well-implemented, the terms and conditions of an award in
project is designed to build capacity and produce evidence of promise (10 the Applicable Regulations section of
yield results that will extend beyond the points). this notice and include these and other
period of Federal financial assistance 2. Review and Selection Process: We specific conditions in the GAN. The
(10 points). remind potential applicants that in GAN also incorporates your approved
(iv) The extent to which the proposed reviewing applications in any application as part of your binding
project is supported by evidence of discretionary grant competition, the commitments under the grant.
promise (10 points). Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR 3. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a
(c) Quality of project personnel (20 75.217(d)(3), the past performance of the grant under this competition, you must
points). The Secretary considers the applicant in carrying out a previous ensure that you have in place the
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

quality of the personnel who will carry award, such as the applicant’s use of necessary processes and systems to
out the proposed project. In determining funds, achievement of project comply with the reporting requirements
the quality of project personnel, the objectives, and compliance with grant in 2 CFR part 170 should you receive
Secretary considers the extent to which conditions. The Secretary may also funding under the competition. This
the applicant encourages applications consider whether the applicant failed to does not apply if you have an exception
for employment from persons who are submit a timely performance report or under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
members of groups that have submitted a report of unacceptable (b) At the end of your project period,
traditionally been underrepresented quality. you must submit a final performance

VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:14 Mar 19, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20MRN1.SGM 20MRN1
Document Created: 2015-12-18 11:34:21
Document Modified: 2015-12-18 11:34:21
Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
Action		Notice.
Contact		Jennifer Brianas, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Room 3E220, Washington, DC 20202- 6450. Telephone: (202) 401-0299 or by email: [email protected]
FR Citation		80 FR 14985