80 FR 16286 - Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Pennsylvania; Pennsylvania Regional Haze State Implementation Plan Revision: Sulfur Dioxide and Nitrogen Oxide Best Available Retrofit Technology Limits for the Cheswick Power Plant
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 59 (March 27, 2015)
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 59 (March 27, 2015)
| Page Range | 16286-16289 | |
| FR Document | 2015-06965 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 59 (Friday, March 27, 2015)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 16286-16289] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-06965] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R03-OAR-2014-0342; FRL-9925-16-Region 3] Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Pennsylvania; Pennsylvania Regional Haze State Implementation Plan Revision: Sulfur Dioxide and Nitrogen Oxide Best Available Retrofit Technology Limits for the Cheswick Power Plant AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing a limited approval and limited disapproval of a revision to the Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania through the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP). This SIP revision addresses the sulfur dioxide (SO2 ) and nitrogen oxide (NOX ) Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) requirements for Boiler Number 1 of the Cheswick Generating Station (Cheswick) in Allegheny County. EPA is finalizing a limited approval of the SIP revision for Cheswick's SO2 and NOX BART requirements on the basis that the revision corrects an error in the SIP and strengthens the Pennsylvania SIP, while EPA is also finalizing a limited disapproval of this part of the SIP revision because the SIP revision relies on the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) and not the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) which has replaced CAIR. This final action is in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and EPA's rules for BART. DATES: This final rule is effective on April 27, 2015. ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID Number EPA-R03-OAR-2014-0342. All documents in the docket are listed in the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the electronic docket, some information is not publicly available, i.e., confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard copy for public inspection during normal business hours at the Air Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State submittal are available at the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Air Quality Control, P.O. Box 8468, 400 Market Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irene Shandruk, (215) 814-2166, or by email at shandruk.irene@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background Regional haze is visibility impairment that is produced by a multitude of sources and activities which are located across a broad geographic area and emit fine particles (e.g., sulfates, nitrates, organic carbon, elemental carbon, and soil dust) and their precursors (e.g., SO2, NOX , and in some cases, ammonia (NH3 ) and volatile organic compounds (VOC)). Fine particle precursors react in the atmosphere to form fine particulate matter (PM2.5 ), which impairs visibility by scattering and absorbing light. Visibility impairment reduces the clarity, color, and visible distance that one can see. Section 169A of the CAA establishes as a national goal the ``prevention of any future, and the remedying of any existing, impairment of visibility in mandatory class I Federal areas which impairment results from manmade air pollution'' and requires SIPs for states whose emissions may reasonably be anticipated to cause or contribute to visibility impairment in Class I areas to contain emission limits, compliance schedules and other measures as may be necessary to make reasonable progress toward the national goal of achieving natural visibility [[Page 16287]] conditions in Class I areas.\1\ A regional haze SIP generally must include, among other measures, source-specific BART emission limits for each source subject to BART. A detailed discussion of the requirements of the regional haze program can be found in our earlier notice proposing action on Pennsylvania's regional haze SIP. See 77 FR 3984 (January 26, 2012). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ EPA's regulations implementing CAA section 169A are located at 40 CFR 51.308 and require states to establish long-term strategies for making reasonable progress toward meeting the national goal in CAA section 169A. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rather than requiring source-specific BART controls, states also have the flexibility to adopt an emissions trading program or other alternative program as long as the alternative provides greater reasonable progress towards improving visibility than BART. 40 CFR 51.308(e)(2). EPA made such a demonstration for the CAIR.\2\ 70 FR 39104 (July 6, 2005). EPA's regulations provided that states participating in the CAIR cap and trade program under 40 CFR part 96 pursuant to an EPA-approved CAIR SIP or which remain subject to the CAIR Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) in 40 CFR part 97, do not require affected BART eligible electric generating units (EGUs) to install, operate, and maintain BART for emissions of SO2 and NOX . See 40 CFR 51.308(e)(4). EPA subsequently determined that the trading programs in CSAPR, which was promulgated to replace CAIR, would achieve greater reasonable progress towards the national goal than would BART and could also serve as an alternative to source- by-source BART. See 77 FR 33641 (June 7, 2012).\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ CAIR required certain states like Pennsylvania to reduce emissions of SO2 and NOX that significantly contribute to downwind nonattainment of the 1997 NAAQS for PM2.5 and ozone. See 70 FR 25162 (May 12, 2005). CAIR was later found to be inconsistent with the requirements of the CAA and the rule was remanded to EPA. See North Carolina v. EPA, 550 F.3d 1176 (D.C. Cir. 2008). The court left CAIR in place until replaced by EPA with a rule consistent with its opinion. Id. \3\ CSAPR was proposed by EPA to replace CAIR and to help states reduce air pollution and attain CAA standards. See 75 FR 45210 (August 2, 2010) (proposal) and 76 FR 48208 (August 8, 2011) (final rule). The United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit (D.C. Circuit) issued a decision in EME Homer City Generation, L.P. v. EPA, 696 F.3d 7 (D.C. Cir. 2012), vacating CSAPR and keeping CAIR in place pending the promulgation of a valid replacement rule. Subsequently, on April 29, 2014, the United States Supreme Court reversed the August 21, 2012 opinion of the D.C. Circuit which had vacated CSAPR and remanded the matter to the D.C. Circuit for further proceedings. EPA v. EME Homer City Generation, L.P., 134 S. Ct. 1584 (2014). After the Supreme Court's decision, EPA filed a motion to lift the stay of CSAPR and asked the D.C. Circuit to toll CSAPR's compliance deadlines by three years, so that the Phase 1 emissions budgets apply in 2015 and 2016 (instead of 2012 and 2013), and the Phase 2 emissions budgets apply in 2017 and beyond (instead of 2014 and beyond). On October 23, 2014, the D.C. Circuit granted EPA's motion and lifted the stay on CSAPR. EME Homer City Generation, L.P. v. EPA, No. 11-1302 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 23, 2014), Order at 3. EPA views the D.C. Circuit's October 23, 2014 Order as also granting EPA's request to toll CSAPR's compliance deadlines. EPA commenced implementation of CSAPR on January 1, 2015. 79 FR 71663 (Dec. 3, 2014) (interim final rule revising CSAPR compliance deadlines). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- On December 20, 2010, PADEP submitted revisions to the Pennsylvania SIP to address regional haze as required by the CAA and 40 CFR 51.308. At the time of the development and submission of Pennsylvania's December 20, 2010 regional haze SIP submission, EPA had not yet promulgated CSAPR to replace CAIR. On July 13, 2012, EPA finalized a limited approval of the Pennsylvania regional haze SIP. 77 FR 41279. Our approval was limited due to Pennsylvania's reliance upon CAIR for certain regional haze requirements including BART for EGUs. On June 7, 2012, EPA had also finalized the limited disapproval of Pennsylvania's regional haze SIP (and other states' regional haze SIPs that relied similarly on CAIR) due to its reliance on CAIR as EPA had issued the CSAPR to replace CAIR at that time. 77 FR 33641. On June 7, 2012, EPA also finalized a limited FIP for Pennsylvania and other states, which merely substituted reliance on EPA's more recent CSAPR NOX and SO2 trading programs for EGUs for the SIP's reliance on CAIR.\4\ See 77 FR 33641. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ In response to a petition for review of EPA's limited approval of the Pennsylvania regional haze SIP in the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, EPA successfully moved for a voluntary remand without vacatur. On April 30, 2014, EPA reissued its final limited approval of the Pennsylvania SIP to implement the Commonwealth's regional haze program for the first planning period through 2018. 79 FR 24340. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the December 20, 2010 regional haze SIP, the Allegheny County Health Department (ACHD) had performed a BART analysis for Cheswick, a Pennsylvania EGU. In the May 4, 2009 Cheswick BART review memo, ACHD stated it performed its BART analysis in accordance with 40 CFR 51.308(e) and 40 CFR part 51, appendix Y, Guidelines for BART Determinations Under the Regional Haze Rule (BART Guidelines).\5\ The May 4, 2009 Cheswick BART review memo was included in Pennsylvania's December 20, 2010 regional haze SIP (in Appendix J) and specifically stated that SO2 and NOX limits were not considered in the memo since the source was participating in CAIR. The May 4, 2009 BART Review Memo for Cheswick and the December 20, 2010 regional haze SIP submission also contained an error concerning the recommended particulate matter (PM) BART for Cheswick. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ The BART Guidelines provide a process for making BART determinations that states and local agencies can use in implementing the regional haze BART requirements on a source-by- source basis, as provided in 40 CFR 51.308(e)(1). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The December 20, 2010 regional haze SIP submission explicitly provided that BART for Pennsylvania EGUs was participation in CAIR; however, the SIP submission incorrectly identified SO2 and NOX BART emission limits for Cheswick in error. II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA Analysis On March 25, 2014, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania through PADEP submitted a SIP revision to revise the incorrect PM BART emission limit for Cheswick's Boiler No. 1 and to remove the errant inclusion of the BART SO2 and NOX emission limits for Cheswick's Boiler No. 1 from the regional haze SIP because Pennsylvania intended CAIR as SO2 and NOX BART for all EGUs including Cheswick. EPA has corrected the PM BART error in a separate rulemaking. See 80 FR 2834 (January 21, 2015). On January 21, 2015 (80 FR 2841), EPA published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania proposing limited approval and limited disapproval of this SIP revision to correct the SO2 and NOX BART for Cheswick. As explained in detail in the NPR, EPA proposed a limited approval to the March 25, 2014 SIP revision to the Cheswick SO2 and NOX BART limits included in the Pennsylvania regional haze SIP because the removal of the specific SO2 and NOX emission limits corrects an error in the regional haze SIP and strengthens the Pennsylvania SIP overall through replacing the incorrect BART limits with Cheswick's participation in an emissions trading program. EPA proposed a limited disapproval to the portion of the SIP revision addressing SO2 and NOX BART for Cheswick because the revision relied on replacing the specific SO2 and NOX limits with CAIR which the D.C. Circuit remanded to EPA and which EPA replaced with CSAPR. EPA began implementing CSAPR on January 1, 2015 as the emissions trading program for SO2 and NOX for EGUs in certain states including Pennsylvania following the D.C. Circuit's lifting of the stay on CSAPR. See EME Homer City Generation, L.P. v. EPA, No. 11-1302 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 23, 2014), Order at 3. See also 79 FR 71663 (interim final rule revising CSAPR compliance deadlines). Although CAA section 110(c)(1) provides that EPA must promulgate a FIP within two years after disapproving [[Page 16288]] a SIP submission in whole or in part, unless EPA approves a SIP revision correcting the deficiencies, EPA believes our limited disapproval of the March 25, 2014 SIP submission does not result in any new FIP obligation for EPA because we already promulgated a FIP on June 7, 2012 to address the identified deficiency (replacing CAIR with CSAPR for SO2 and NOX BART for Pennsylvania EGUs). Thus, as explained in the NPR, the June 7, 2012 FIP fully addresses Cheswick's SO2 and NOX BART because Cheswick is a Pennsylvania EGU subject to CSAPR. Under section 179(a) of the CAA, final disapproval of a submittal that addresses a requirement of part D of title I of the CAA (CAA sections 171-193) or is required in response to a finding of substantial inadequacy as described in CAA section 110(k)(5) (SIP Call) starts a sanctions clock. Pennsylvania's March 25, 2014 SIP revision submittal for revising Cheswick's BART was not submitted to meet either of these requirements. Therefore, our limited disapproval of Pennsylvania's SIP submission concerning Cheswick's SO2 and NOX BART does not trigger mandatory sanctions under CAA section 179. Other specific requirements and the rationale for EPA's proposed action are explained in the NPR and will not be restated here.\6\ No adverse public comments were received on the NPR. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ In the NPR, EPA found this SIP revision to Cheswick's BARTs complies with section 110(l) of the CAA and will not interfere with any applicable requirements concerning attainment and reasonable further progress or any other applicable requirement of the CAA, such as the visibility and regional haze provisions of sections 169A and 169B of the CAA. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- III. Final Action EPA is finalizing a limited approval of the portion of the Pennsylvania March 25, 2014 revision to its regional haze SIP which removes specific SO2 and NOX BART emission limitations for Cheswick set in error and is finalizing a limited disapproval of the SIP revision due to its reliance upon CAIR, which has been replaced with CSAPR. As EPA issued a FIP for SO2 and NOX BART emission limitations for EGUs in Pennsylvania, which includes Cheswick, no further action by EPA is required to address the limited disapproval. This conclusion is based on our review of the March 25, 2014 SIP revision as well as Pennsylvania's December 20, 2010 regional haze SIP submission, including technical data and supporting analysis. This final action concludes that Cheswick's participation in CSAPR supersedes the previous SO2 and NOX BART determinations for Cheswick included in Pennsylvania's regional haze SIP. IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews A. General Requirements Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993); does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. Section 804, however, exempts from section 801 the following types of rules: Rules of particular applicability; rules relating to agency management or personnel; and rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice that do not substantially affect the rights or obligations of non-agency parties. 5 U.S.C. 804(3). Because this is a rule of particular applicability, EPA is not required to submit a rule report regarding this action under section 801. C. Petitions for Judicial Review Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by May 26, 2015. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action revising the SO 2 and NOX BART emission limitations for Cheswick in Pennsylvania's regional haze SIP may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides. Dated: March 10, 2015. William C. Early, Acting Regional Administrator, Region III. Therefore, 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: [[Page 16289]] PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 0 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart NN--Pennsylvania 0 2. In Sec. 52.2020, the table in paragraph (e)(1) is amended by adding a new entry following the existing entries for ``Regional Haze Plan'' to read as follows: Sec. 52.2020 Identification of plan. * * * * * (e) * * * (1) * * * -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name of non-regulatory SIP Applicable geographic State revision area submittal date EPA Approval date Additional explanation -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Regional Haze Plan................ Statewide............ 3/25/14 3/27/15 [Insert Federal Register Rulemaking pertains to Boiler No. 1 citation]. of the Cheswick Power Plant in Allegheny County. Limited approval removes SO2 and NOX Best Available Retrofit Technology limits. Limited disapproval relates to the Federal Implementation Plan at Sec. 52.2042(b) and (c). -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * [FR Doc. 2015-06965 Filed 3-26-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![16286 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 59 / Friday, March 27, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Dated: March 10, 2015. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
William C. Early,
Environmental protection, Air Acting Regional Administrator, Region III. Subpart NN—Pennsylvania
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Therefore, 40 CFR part 52 is amended
as follows: ■ 2. In § 52.2020, the table in paragraph
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
(c)(1) is amended by revising the entry
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate PART 52—APPROVAL AND ‘‘Section 127.701’’ to read as follows:
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping PROMULGATION OF
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile IMPLEMENTATION PLANS § 52.2020 Identification of plan.
organic compounds. * * * * *
■ 1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows: (c) * * *
(1) EPA-APPROVED PENNSYLVANIA REGULATIONS AND STATUTES
State effective Additional explanation/
State citation Title/Subject EPA Approval date
date § 52.2063 citation
* * * * * * *
Subchapter I—Plan Approval and Operating Permit Fees
Section 127.701 ........................... General provisions ....................... 12/14/13 3/27/15 [Insert Federal Paragraphs (b) and (c) re-
Register citation]. vised.
* * * * * * *
* * * * * BART requirements on the basis that the Control, P.O. Box 8468, 400 Market
[FR Doc. 2015–06968 Filed 3–26–15; 8:45 am] revision corrects an error in the SIP and Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105.
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
strengthens the Pennsylvania SIP, while
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
EPA is also finalizing a limited
disapproval of this part of the SIP Irene Shandruk, (215) 814–2166, or by
revision because the SIP revision relies email at shandruk.irene@epa.gov.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY on the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
and not the Cross-State Air Pollution
40 CFR Part 52 Rule (CSAPR) which has replaced CAIR. I. Background
This final action is in accordance with
[EPA–R03–OAR–2014–0342; FRL–9925–16– Regional haze is visibility impairment
the requirements of the Clean Air Act
Region 3] that is produced by a multitude of
(CAA) and EPA’s rules for BART.
sources and activities which are located
Approval and Promulgation of DATES: This final rule is effective on
across a broad geographic area and emit
Implementation Plans; Pennsylvania; April 27, 2015. fine particles (e.g., sulfates, nitrates,
Pennsylvania Regional Haze State ADDRESSES: EPA has established a organic carbon, elemental carbon, and
Implementation Plan Revision: Sulfur docket for this action under Docket ID soil dust) and their precursors (e.g., SO2,
Dioxide and Nitrogen Oxide Best Number EPA–R03–OAR–2014–0342. All NOX, and in some cases, ammonia (NH3)
Available Retrofit Technology Limits documents in the docket are listed in and volatile organic compounds (VOC)).
for the Cheswick Power Plant the www.regulations.gov Web site. Fine particle precursors react in the
Although listed in the electronic docket, atmosphere to form fine particulate
AGENCY: Environmental Protection some information is not publicly
matter (PM2.5), which impairs visibility
Agency (EPA). available, i.e., confidential business
by scattering and absorbing light.
ACTION: Final rule. information (CBI) or other information
Visibility impairment reduces the
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection clarity, color, and visible distance that
Certain other material, such as
Agency (EPA) is finalizing a limited one can see. Section 169A of the CAA
copyrighted material, is not placed on
approval and limited disapproval of a the Internet and will be publicly establishes as a national goal the
revision to the Pennsylvania State available only in hard copy form. ‘‘prevention of any future, and the
Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by Publicly available docket materials are remedying of any existing, impairment
the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania available either electronically through of visibility in mandatory class I Federal
through the Pennsylvania Department of www.regulations.gov or in hard copy for areas which impairment results from
Environmental Protection (PADEP). public inspection during normal manmade air pollution’’ and requires
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
This SIP revision addresses the sulfur business hours at the Air Protection SIPs for states whose emissions may
dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxide (NOX) Division, U.S. Environmental Protection reasonably be anticipated to cause or
Best Available Retrofit Technology Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, contribute to visibility impairment in
(BART) requirements for Boiler Number Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Class I areas to contain emission limits,
1 of the Cheswick Generating Station Copies of the State submittal are compliance schedules and other
(Cheswick) in Allegheny County. EPA is available at the Pennsylvania measures as may be necessary to make
finalizing a limited approval of the SIP Department of Environmental reasonable progress toward the national
revision for Cheswick’s SO2 and NOX Protection, Bureau of Air Quality goal of achieving natural visibility
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:44 Mar 26, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\27MRR1.SGM 27MRR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_16345/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 59 / Friday, March 27, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 16289
PART 52—APPROVAL AND Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. following the existing entries for
PROMULGATION OF ‘‘Regional Haze Plan’’ to read as follows:
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Subpart NN—Pennsylvania § 52.2020 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 ■ 2. In § 52.2020, the table in paragraph
(e) * * *
continues to read as follows: (e)(1) is amended by adding a new entry
(1) * * *
State
Name of non-regulatory Applicable geographic area submittal EPA Approval date Additional explanation
SIP revision date
* * * * * * *
Regional Haze Plan ..................... Statewide ..................................... 3/25/14 3/27/15 [Insert Federal Rulemaking pertains to
Register citation]. Boiler No. 1 of the
Cheswick Power Plant
in Allegheny County.
Limited approval removes
SO2 and NOX Best
Available Retrofit Tech-
nology limits. Limited
disapproval relates to
the Federal Implementa-
tion Plan at § 52.2042(b)
and (c).
* * * * * * *
* * * * * DATES: This rule is effective on May 26, be automatically captured and included
[FR Doc. 2015–06965 Filed 3–26–15; 8:45 am] 2015 without further notice, unless EPA as part of the public comment. If EPA
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P receives adverse comments by April 27, cannot read your comment due to
2015. If we receive such comments, we technical difficulties and cannot contact
will publish a timely withdrawal in the you for clarification, EPA may not be
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Federal Register to notify the public able to consider your comment.
AGENCY that this direct final rule will not take Electronic files should avoid the use of
effect. special characters, any form of
40 CFR Part 52 ADDRESSES: Submit comments, encryption, and be free of any defects or
identified by docket number EPA–R09– viruses.
[EPA–R09–OAR–2015–0083; FRL–9924–73– OAR–2015–0083, by one of the Docket: Generally, documents in the
Region 9] following methods: docket for this action are available
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: electronically at www.regulations.gov
Revisions to the California State www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
Implementation Plan, Placer County and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75
instructions. Hawthorne Street, San Francisco,
Air Pollution Control District and the 2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
Ventura County Air Pollution Control California 94105–3901. While all
3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel documents in the docket are listed at
District (Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection www.regulations.gov, some information
Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, may be publicly available only at the
AGENCY: Environmental Protection San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
Agency (EPA). hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted
Instructions: All comments will be
material, large maps), and some may not
ACTION: Direct final rule. included in the public docket without
be publicly available in either location
change and may be made available
(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection online at www.regulations.gov,
materials, please schedule an
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final including any personal information
appointment during normal business
action to approve revisions to the Placer provided, unless the comment includes
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
County Air Pollution Control District Confidential Business Information (CBI)
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
(PCAPCD) and Ventura County Air or other information whose disclosure is
Pollution Control District (VCAPCD) restricted by statute. Information that FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
portions of the California State you consider CBI or otherwise protected Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, (415)
Implementation Plan (SIP). These should be clearly identified as such and 947–3024, lazarus.arnold@epa.gov.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
revisions concern volatile organic should not be submitted through SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
compound (VOC) emissions from the www.regulations.gov or email. Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
surface coating of plastic parts and www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
products, metalworking fluids (MWF) access’’ system, and EPA will not know
and direct-contact lubricants (DCL). We your identity or contact information Table of Contents
are approving local rules that regulate unless you provide it in the body of I. The State’s Submittal
these emission sources under the Clean your comment. If you send email A. What rules did the State submit?
Air Act (CAA or the Act). directly to EPA, your email address will B. Are there other versions of these rules?
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:44 Mar 26, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\27MRR1.SGM 27MRR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_16345/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-18 11:36:45
Document Modified: 2015-12-18 11:36:45
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule. | |
| Dates | This final rule is effective on April 27, 2015. | |
| Contact | Irene Shandruk, (215) 814-2166, or by email at [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 16286 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Nitrogen Dioxide; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Sulfur Oxides |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR