80 FR 16289 - Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Placer County Air Pollution Control District and the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 59 (March 27, 2015)
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 59 (March 27, 2015)
| Page Range | 16289-16291 | |
| FR Document | 2015-06858 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 59 (Friday, March 27, 2015)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 16289-16291] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-06858] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0083; FRL-9924-73-Region 9] Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Placer County Air Pollution Control District and the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the Placer County Air Pollution Control District (PCAPCD) and Ventura County Air Pollution Control District (VCAPCD) portions of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from the surface coating of plastic parts and products, metalworking fluids (MWF) and direct-contact lubricants (DCL). We are approving local rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). DATES: This rule is effective on May 26, 2015 without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comments by April 27, 2015. If we receive such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that this direct final rule will not take effect. ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR- 2015-0083, by one of the following methods: 1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the on- line instructions. 2. Email: [email protected]. 3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901. Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through www.regulations.gov or email. www.regulations.gov is an ``anonymous access'' system, and EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send email directly to EPA, your email address will be automatically captured and included as part of the public comment. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. Docket: Generally, documents in the docket for this action are available electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105-3901. While all documents in the docket are listed at www.regulations.gov, some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps), and some may not be publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, (415) 947-3024, [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,'' and ``our'' refer to EPA. Table of Contents I. The State's Submittal A. What rules did the State submit? B. Are there other versions of these rules? [[Page 16290]] C. What is the purpose of the submitted rules? II. EPA's Evaluation and Action A. How is EPA evaluating the rules? B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria? C. EPA Recommendations To Further Improve the Rules D. Public Comment and Final Action III. Incorporation by Reference IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. The State's Submittal A. What rules did the State submit? Table 1 lists the rules addressed by this Submittal with the dates that they were adopted by the local air agencies and submitted by the California Air Resources Board. Table 1--Submitted Rules ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Local agency Rule number Rule title Adopted Submitted ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PCAPCD............................ 249.............. Surface Coating of 8/8/13 5/13/14 Plastic Parts and Products. VCAPCD............................ 74.31............ Metalworking Fluids and 11/12/13 5/13/14 Direct-Contact Lubricants. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- On July 18, 2014, EPA determined that the submittals for PCAPCD Rule 249 and VCAPCD Rule 74.31 met the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51 Appendix V, which must be met before formal EPA review. B. Are there other versions of these rules? There are no previous versions of PCAPCD Rule 249 or VCAPCD Rule 74.31 in the SIP. C. What is the purpose of the submitted rules? VOCs help produce ground-level ozone and smog, which harm human health and the environment. Section 110(a) of the CAA requires States to submit regulations that control VOC emissions. Rule 249 establishes VOC content limits and workplace standards for the surface coating of plastic parts and products. It also describes related recordkeeping, reporting, and monitoring requirements. Rule 74.31 establishes VOC content limits and usage for MWF and DCL. Rule 74.31 applies to any person who uses MWF and DCL commercially or industrially and to any manufacturer or supplier who supplies, sells, or offers for sale either MWF or DCL for use at industrial or commercial facilities. Such persons must use compliant fluids as specified by rule 74.31. EPA's technical support documents (TSDs) have more information about these rules. II. EPA's Evaluation and Action A. How is EPA evaluating the rules? 40 CFR 81.305 describes PCAPCD as regulating an ozone nonattainment area classified as Severe and VCAPCD classified as Serious for the 8- hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) (2008 Standard). SIP rules must be enforceable (see CAA section 110(a)(2)), must not interfere with applicable requirements concerning attainment and reasonable further progress or other CAA requirements (see CAA section 110(l)), and must not modify certain SIP control requirements in nonattainment areas without ensuring equivalent or greater emissions reductions (see CAA section 193). Generally, SIP rules must require Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for each category of sources covered by a Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) document as well as each VOC major source in ozone nonattainment areas classified as moderate or above (see sections 182(b)(2) and 182(f)). Guidance and policy documents that we use to evaluate enforceability, revision/relaxation and rule stringency requirements for the applicable criteria pollutants include the following: 1. ``State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for the Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,'' (57 FR 13498, April 16, 1992 and 57 FR 18070, April 28, 1992). 2. ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and Deviations'' (``the Bluebook,'' U.S. EPA, May 25, 1988; revised January 11, 1990). 3. ``Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule Deficiencies'' (``the Little Bluebook'', EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001). 4. ``Control Techniques Guidelines for Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts Coatings'' (CTG), September 2008. (EPA 453-R-008-003). B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria? We believe these rules are consistent with the relevant policy and guidance regarding enforceability, RACT, and SIP relaxations. The VOC content limits and usage requirements in Rule 249 are equivalent or more stringent to the relevant sections of EPA's 2008 metal parts CTG, implement RACT and strengthen the SIP. Rule 74.31 strengthens the SIP because the VCAPCD did not have a SIP approved rule regulating MWF and DCL and there exists no relevant CTG, but we also believe Rule 74.31 implements RACT. The TSDs associated with each rule have more information on our evaluation. C. EPA Recommendations To Further Improve the Rules The TSDs describe additional rule revisions that we recommend for the next time the local agencies modify the rules but are not currently the basis for rule disapproval. D. Public Comment and Final Action As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, EPA is fully approving the submitted rules because we believe they fulfill all relevant requirements. We do not think anyone will object to this approval, so we are finalizing it without proposing it in advance. However, in the Proposed Rules section of this Federal Register, we are simultaneously proposing approval of the same submitted rules. If we receive adverse comments by April 27, 2015, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that the direct final approval will not take effect and we will address the comments in a subsequent final action based on the proposal. If we do not receive timely adverse comments, the direct final approval will be effective without further notice on May 26, 2015. This will incorporate these rules into the federally enforceable SIP. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. III. Incorporation by Reference In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In [[Page 16291]] accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the PCAPCD and VCAPCD rules described in the amendments to 40 CFR 52 set forth below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents available electronically through www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at the appropriate EPA office (see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble for more information). IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993); Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address disproportionate human health or environmental effects with practical, appropriate, and legally permissible methods under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by May 26, 2015. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the Proposed Rules section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: February 27, 2015. Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, Region IX. Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 0 1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart F--California 0 2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(441)(i)(B)(3) and (c)(441)(i)(C)(2) to read as follows: Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan. * * * * * (c) * * * (441) * * * (i) * * * (B) * * * (3) Rule 249, ``Surface Coating of Plastic Parts and Products,'' adopted on August 8, 2013. (C) * * * (2) Metalworking Fluids and Direct-Contact Lubricants,'' adopted on November 12, 2013. * * * * * [FR Doc. 2015-06858 Filed 3-26-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 59 / Friday, March 27, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 16289
PART 52—APPROVAL AND Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. following the existing entries for
PROMULGATION OF ‘‘Regional Haze Plan’’ to read as follows:
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Subpart NN—Pennsylvania § 52.2020 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 ■ 2. In § 52.2020, the table in paragraph
(e) * * *
continues to read as follows: (e)(1) is amended by adding a new entry
(1) * * *
State
Name of non-regulatory Applicable geographic area submittal EPA Approval date Additional explanation
SIP revision date
* * * * * * *
Regional Haze Plan ..................... Statewide ..................................... 3/25/14 3/27/15 [Insert Federal Rulemaking pertains to
Register citation]. Boiler No. 1 of the
Cheswick Power Plant
in Allegheny County.
Limited approval removes
SO2 and NOX Best
Available Retrofit Tech-
nology limits. Limited
disapproval relates to
the Federal Implementa-
tion Plan at § 52.2042(b)
and (c).
* * * * * * *
* * * * * DATES: This rule is effective on May 26, be automatically captured and included
[FR Doc. 2015–06965 Filed 3–26–15; 8:45 am] 2015 without further notice, unless EPA as part of the public comment. If EPA
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P receives adverse comments by April 27, cannot read your comment due to
2015. If we receive such comments, we technical difficulties and cannot contact
will publish a timely withdrawal in the you for clarification, EPA may not be
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Federal Register to notify the public able to consider your comment.
AGENCY that this direct final rule will not take Electronic files should avoid the use of
effect. special characters, any form of
40 CFR Part 52 ADDRESSES: Submit comments, encryption, and be free of any defects or
identified by docket number EPA–R09– viruses.
[EPA–R09–OAR–2015–0083; FRL–9924–73– OAR–2015–0083, by one of the Docket: Generally, documents in the
Region 9] following methods: docket for this action are available
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: electronically at www.regulations.gov
Revisions to the California State www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
Implementation Plan, Placer County and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75
instructions. Hawthorne Street, San Francisco,
Air Pollution Control District and the 2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
Ventura County Air Pollution Control California 94105–3901. While all
3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel documents in the docket are listed at
District (Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection www.regulations.gov, some information
Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, may be publicly available only at the
AGENCY: Environmental Protection San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
Agency (EPA). hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted
Instructions: All comments will be
material, large maps), and some may not
ACTION: Direct final rule. included in the public docket without
be publicly available in either location
change and may be made available
(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection online at www.regulations.gov,
materials, please schedule an
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final including any personal information
appointment during normal business
action to approve revisions to the Placer provided, unless the comment includes
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
County Air Pollution Control District Confidential Business Information (CBI)
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
(PCAPCD) and Ventura County Air or other information whose disclosure is
Pollution Control District (VCAPCD) restricted by statute. Information that FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
portions of the California State you consider CBI or otherwise protected Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, (415)
Implementation Plan (SIP). These should be clearly identified as such and 947–3024, lazarus.arnold@epa.gov.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
revisions concern volatile organic should not be submitted through SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
compound (VOC) emissions from the www.regulations.gov or email. Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
surface coating of plastic parts and www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
products, metalworking fluids (MWF) access’’ system, and EPA will not know
and direct-contact lubricants (DCL). We your identity or contact information Table of Contents
are approving local rules that regulate unless you provide it in the body of I. The State’s Submittal
these emission sources under the Clean your comment. If you send email A. What rules did the State submit?
Air Act (CAA or the Act). directly to EPA, your email address will B. Are there other versions of these rules?
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:44 Mar 26, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\27MRR1.SGM 27MRR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_16348/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 59 / Friday, March 27, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 16291
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR disproportionate human health or requirements, Volatile organic
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the environmental effects with practical, compounds.
incorporation by reference of the appropriate, and legally permissible Dated: February 27, 2015.
PCAPCD and VCAPCD rules described methods under Executive Order 12898 Jared Blumenfeld,
in the amendments to 40 CFR 52 set (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on Regional Administrator, Region IX.
forth below. The EPA has made, and
will continue to make, these documents any Indian reservation land or in any Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code
available electronically through other area where EPA or an Indian tribe of Federal Regulations is amended as
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy has demonstrated that a tribe has follows:
at the appropriate EPA office (see the jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
ADDRESSES section of this preamble for country, the rule does not have tribal PART 52—APPROVAL AND
more information). implications and will not impose PROMULGATION OF
substantial direct costs on tribal IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
IV. Statutory and Executive Order governments or preempt tribal law as
Reviews specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 ■ 1. The authority citation for Part 52
Under the Clean Air Act, the FR 67249, November 9, 2000). continues to read as follows:
Administrator is required to approve a The Congressional Review Act, 5 Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
SIP submission that complies with the U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
provisions of the Act and applicable Business Regulatory Enforcement Subpart F—California
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the ■ 2. Section 52.220 is amended by
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
agency promulgating the rule must adding paragraphs (c)(441)(i)(B)(3) and
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
submit a rule report, which includes a (c)(441)(i)(C)(2) to read as follows:
State choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act. copy of the rule, to each House of the § 52.220 Identification of plan.
Accordingly, this action merely Congress and to the Comptroller General
* * * * *
approves State law as meeting Federal of the United States. EPA will submit a (c) * * *
requirements and does not impose report containing this action and other (441) * * *
additional requirements beyond those required information to the U.S. Senate, (i) * * *
imposed by State law. For that reason, the U.S. House of Representatives, and (B) * * *
this action: the Comptroller General of the United (3) Rule 249, ‘‘Surface Coating of
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory States prior to publication of the rule in Plastic Parts and Products,’’ adopted on
action’’ subject to review by the Office the Federal Register. A major rule August 8, 2013.
of Management and Budget under cannot take effect until 60 days after it (C) * * *
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, is published in the Federal Register. (2) Metalworking Fluids and Direct-
October 4, 1993); This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as Contact Lubricants,’’ adopted on
• Does not impose an information defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). November 12, 2013.
collection burden under the provisions Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of * * * * *
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 [FR Doc. 2015–06858 Filed 3–26–15; 8:45 am]
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); this action must be filed in the United
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
• Is certified as not having a States Court of Appeals for the
significant economic impact on a appropriate circuit by May 26, 2015.
substantial number of small entities Filing a petition for reconsideration by ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 the Administrator of this final rule does AGENCY
U.S.C. 601 et seq.); not affect the finality of this action for
• Does not contain any unfunded the purposes of judicial review nor does 40 CFR Part 52
mandate or significantly or uniquely it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed, [EPA–R06–OAR–2013–0804; FRL–9925–13–
affect small governments, as described Region 6]
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); of such rule or action. Parties with Approval and Promulgation of
• Does not have Federalism objections to this direct final rule are Implementation Plans; Texas;
implications as specified in Executive encouraged to file a comment in Reasonably Available Control
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, response to the parallel notice of Technology for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone
1999); proposed rulemaking for this action National Ambient Air Quality Standard
• Is not an economically significant published in the Proposed Rules section
regulatory action based on health or of today’s Federal Register, rather than AGENCY: Environmental Protection
safety risks subject to Executive Order file an immediate petition for judicial Agency (EPA).
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); review of this direct final rule, so that ACTION: Final rule.
• Is not a significant regulatory action EPA can withdraw this direct final rule
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR and address the comment in the SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
28355, May 22, 2001); proposed rulemaking. This action may Agency (EPA) is finalizing its proposal
• Is not subject to requirements of not be challenged later in proceedings to to approve revisions to the Texas State
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Section 12(d) of the National enforce its requirements (see section Implementation Plan (SIP) for the
Technology Transfer and Advancement 307(b)(2)). Houston/Galveston/Brazoria (HGB) and
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because Dallas Fort Worth (DFW) 1997 8-Hour
application of those requirements would List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 ozone nonattainment areas. The HGB
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; Environmental protection, Air area consists of Brazoria, Chambers, Fort
and pollution control, Incorporation by Bend, Galveston, Harris, Liberty,
• Does not provide EPA with the reference, Intergovernmental relations, Montgomery and Waller counties. The
discretionary authority to address Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping DFW area consists of Collin, Dallas,
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:44 Mar 26, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\27MRR1.SGM 27MRR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_16348/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-18 11:36:30
Document Modified: 2015-12-18 11:36:30
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Direct final rule. | |
| Dates | This rule is effective on May 26, 2015 without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comments by April 27, 2015. If we receive such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that this direct final rule will not take effect. | |
| Contact | Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, (415) 947-3024, [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 16289 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Ozone; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Volatile Organic Compounds |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR