80 FR 18814 - Glycine From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Intent To Rescind, in Part; 2013-2014
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 67 (April 8, 2015)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 67 (April 8, 2015)
| Page Range | 18814-18816 | |
| FR Document | 2015-07952 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 67 (Wednesday, April 8, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 18814-18816] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-07952] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-836] Glycine From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Intent To Rescind, in Part; 2013-2014 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on glycine from the People's Republic of China (the PRC) covering the period of review (POR) from March 1, 2013, through February 28, 2014. The administrative review covers two mandatory respondents, Baoding Mantong Fine Chemistry Co. Ltd. (Baoding Mantong) and Evonik Rexim (Nanning) Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Evonik). The Department preliminarily finds that Baoding Mantong sold subject merchandise in the United States at prices below the normal value (NV) during the POR. The Department preliminarily determines that Evonik's sales to the United States were not bona fide and is preliminarily rescinding the review with respect to Evonik. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Effective Date: April 8, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dena Crossland or Ericka Ukrow, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 3362 or (202) 482-0405, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On April 30, 2014, the Department initiated an administrative review of the antidumping duty Order \1\ on glycine from the PRC.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Antidumping Duty Order: Glycine from the People's Republic of China, 60 FR 16116 (March 29, 1995) (Order). \2\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 79 FR 24398 (April 30, 2014). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The product covered by the antidumping duty order is glycine, which is a free-flowing crystalline material, like salt or sugar.\3\ The subject merchandise is currently classifiable under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheading 2922.49.4020. The HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes only; the written product description of the scope of the order is dispositive.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Glycine from the People's Republic of China; 2013-2014'' from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, dated concurrently with this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), for a complete description of the scope of the order. \4\ See Order. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is provided as an Appendix to the notice. This memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at http://www.trade.gov/enforcement/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Bona Fides Analysis As discussed in Evonik's Bona Fide Memorandum, the Department preliminarily finds that the sales by Evonik are not bona fide, and that these sales, and absence of factors-of-production (FOP) data, do not provide a reasonable or reliable basis for calculating a dumping margin.\5\ The Department reached this conclusion based on the totality of circumstances, namely: (a) The atypical nature of Evonik's price; and (b) the atypical circumstances surrounding its supplier's inability to provide FOP data. Because these non-bona fide sales were the only sales of subject merchandise that Evonik made during the POR, the Department is preliminarily rescinding its review of Evonik. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Memorandum to Abdelali Elouaradia, Acting Director, Office VI, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, through Angelica Townshend, Program Manager, Office VI, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, from Ericka Ukrow, International Trade Compliance Analyst, Office VI, titled ``Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Glycine from the People's Republic of China; 2013-2014: Bona Fide Nature of Evonik Rexim (Nanning) Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.'s Sales,'' dated concurrently and hereby adopted by this notice (Evonik's Bona Fide Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Results of Review The Department has preliminarily determined that the following dumping margin exists for the period March 1, 2013, through February 28, 2014: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dumping Exporter margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Baoding Mantong Fine Chemistry Co. Ltd..................... 784.48 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [[Page 18815]] Disclosure and Public Comment The Department intends to disclose calculations performed for these preliminary results to the parties within five days of the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Interested parties may submit case briefs no later than 30 days after the date of publication of these preliminary results of review.\6\ Rebuttal briefs, which must be limited to issues raised in the case briefs, must be filed within five days after the time limit for filing case briefs.\7\ A table of contents, list of authorities used, and an executive summary of issues should accompany any briefs submitted to the Department. This summary should be limited to five pages total, including footnotes. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). \7\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1)-(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Any interested party may request a hearing within 30 days of the publication of this notice.\8\ Hearing requests should contain the following information: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of the issues to be discussed. Oral argument presentations will be limited to issues raised in the briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, parties will be notified of the date and time for the hearing to be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230.\9\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). \9\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, which will include the results of our analysis of all issues raised in the briefs, within 120 days after the publication of these preliminary results in the Federal Register, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Assessment Rates Upon issuance of the final results of this review, the Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.\10\ The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of the final results of this review. If we proceed to a final rescission of this administrative review, with respect to Evonik, then its entries will be assessed at the rate entered.\11\ For each individually examined respondent in this review whose weighted-average dumping margin in the final results of review is above de minimis (i.e., greater than or equal to 0.5 percent), the Department intends to calculate importer- (or customer)- specific assessment rates, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).\12\ Where the respondent reported reliable entered values, the Department intends to calculate importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem rates by aggregating the dumping margins calculated for all U.S. sales to the importer (or customer) and dividing this amount by the total entered value of the sales to the importer (or customer).\13\ Where the Department calculates an importer- (or customer-) specific weighted- average dumping margin by dividing the total amount of dumping for reviewed sales to the importer (or customer) by the total sales quantity associated with those transactions, the Department will direct CBP to assess importer- (or customer-)specific assessment rates based on the resulting per-unit rates.\14\ Where an importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem or per-unit rate is greater than de minimis, the Department will instruct CBP to collect the appropriate duties at the time of liquidation. Where either the respondent's weighted average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem or per-unit rate is zero or de minimis, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.\15\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). \11\ See 19 CFR 351.212(c)(2). \12\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification). \13\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). \14\ Id. \15\ See Final Modification at 8103. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- On October 24, 2011, the Department announced a refinement to its assessment practice in non-market economy antidumping duty cases.\16\ Pursuant to this refinement in practice, for entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales database submitted by an exporter individually examined during this review, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide rate. Additionally, pursuant to this refinement, if the Department determines that an exporter under review had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended entries that entered under that exporter's case number (i.e., at that exporter's rate) will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \16\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011), for a full discussion of this practice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, the final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final results of this review and for future deposits of estimated duties, where applicable. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements, when imposed, will apply to all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the companies listed above that have a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that rate established in the final results of this administrative review (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, then a zero cash deposit will be required); (2) for any previously reviewed or investigated PRC and non-PRC exporter not listed above that received a separate rate in a previous segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporter-specific rate published for the most recently completed period; (3) for all PRC exporters that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that for the PRC-wide entity (i.e., 453.79 percent); 17 18 and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied the non-PRC exporter. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \17\ See Glycine From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011-2012, 78 FR 20891 (April 8, 2013). \18\ The Department's change in policy regarding conditional review of the PRC-wide entity applies to this administrative review. See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). Under this policy, the PRC-wide entity will not be under review unless a party specifically requests, or the Department self-initiates, a review of the entity. Because no party requested a review of the PRC-wide entity in this review, the entity is not under review and the entity's rate is not subject to change. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this [[Page 18816]] review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213. Dated: March 31, 2015. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 1. Summary 2. Background 3. Scope of the Order 4. Discussion of the Methodology 5. Bona Fides Inquiry 6. Non-Market Economy Country Status 7. Separate Rates Determination A. Absence of De Jure Control B. Absence of De Facto Control 8. The PRC-Wide Entity 9. Surrogate Country A. Economic Comparability B. Significant Producer of Comparable Merchandise C. Data Availability 10. Date of Sale 11. Fair Value Comparisons A. Export Price B. Value-Added Tax C. Normal Value 12. Factor Valuation Methodology A. ME Prices B. Surrogate Values 13. Comparisons to Normal Value A. Determination of Comparison Method B. Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis 14. Currency Conversion 15. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2015-07952 Filed 4-7-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![18814 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 67 / Wednesday, April 8, 2015 / Notices
last day of the most recently completed review covers two mandatory description of the methodology
administrative review under the order.6 respondents, Baoding Mantong Fine underlying our conclusions, see the
Chemistry Co. Ltd. (Baoding Mantong) Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Instructions to U.S. Customs and
and Evonik Rexim (Nanning) The list of topics discussed in the
Border Protection
Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Evonik). The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
As we stated in our Initiation and Department preliminarily finds that provided as an Appendix to the notice.
Preliminary Results, we will instruct Baoding Mantong sold subject This memorandum is a public
U.S. Customs and Border Protection to merchandise in the United States at document and is on file electronically
end the suspension of liquidation for prices below the normal value (NV) via Enforcement and Compliance’s
the merchandise covered by the during the POR. The Department Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
revocation on the effective date of this preliminarily determines that Evonik’s Centralized Electronic Service System
notice of revocation, in part, and to sales to the United States were not bona (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
release any cash deposit or bond, fide and is preliminarily rescinding the registered users at http://
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.222(g)(4). review with respect to Evonik. access.trade.gov and in the Central
Interested parties are invited to Records Unit, room 7046 of the main
Notification
comment on these preliminary results. Department of Commerce building. In
This notice serves as a reminder to DATES: Effective Date: April 8, 2015. addition, a complete version of the
parties subject to administrative FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Preliminary Decision Memorandum can
protective order (APO) of their Dena Crossland or Ericka Ukrow, AD/ be accessed directly on the Internet at
responsibility concerning the CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement http://www.trade.gov/enforcement/. The
disposition of proprietary information and Compliance, International Trade signed Preliminary Decision
disclosed under APO in accordance Administration, U.S. Department of Memorandum and the electronic
with 19 CFR 351.306. Timely written Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution versions of the Preliminary Decision
notification of the return/destruction of Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; Memorandum are identical in content.
APO materials or conversion to judicial telephone: (202) 482–3362 or (202) 482–
protective order is hereby requested. Bona Fides Analysis
0405, respectively.
Failure to comply with the regulations SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As discussed in Evonik’s Bona Fide
and terms of an APO is a sanctionable Memorandum, the Department
violation. Background preliminarily finds that the sales by
This notice is published in On April 30, 2014, the Department Evonik are not bona fide, and that these
accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and initiated an administrative review of the sales, and absence of factors-of-
777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR antidumping duty Order 1 on glycine production (FOP) data, do not provide
351.216(e), 351.221(b)(5), and from the PRC.2 a reasonable or reliable basis for
351.222(g). calculating a dumping margin.5 The
Scope of the Order
Dated: April 2, 2015. Department reached this conclusion
The product covered by the based on the totality of circumstances,
Paul Piquado
antidumping duty order is glycine, namely: (a) The atypical nature of
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and which is a free-flowing crystalline
Compliance. Evonik’s price; and (b) the atypical
material, like salt or sugar.3 The subject circumstances surrounding its
[FR Doc. 2015–08112 Filed 4–7–15; 8:45 am]
merchandise is currently classifiable supplier’s inability to provide FOP data.
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule Because these non-bona fide sales were
of the United States (HTSUS) the only sales of subject merchandise
subheading 2922.49.4020. The HTSUS that Evonik made during the POR, the
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE subheading is provided for convenience Department is preliminarily rescinding
International Trade Administration and customs purposes only; the written its review of Evonik.
product description of the scope of the
[A–570–836] order is dispositive.4 Preliminary Results of Review
Methodology The Department has preliminarily
Glycine From the People’s Republic of
determined that the following dumping
China: Preliminary Results of The Department is conducting this margin exists for the period March 1,
Antidumping Duty Administrative review in accordance with section 2013, through February 28, 2014:
Review and Preliminary Intent To 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
Rescind, in Part; 2013–2014 amended (the Act). For a full Dumping
Exporter margin
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 1 See Antidumping Duty Order: Glycine from the (percent)
International Trade Administration, People’s Republic of China, 60 FR 16116 (March 29,
Department of Commerce. 1995) (Order). Baoding Mantong Fine Chem-
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 2 See Initiation of Antidumping and
istry Co. Ltd ............................. 784.48
(the Department) is conducting an Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and
Request for Revocation in Part, 79 FR 24398 (April
administrative review of the 30, 2014). 5 See Memorandum to Abdelali Elouaradia,
antidumping duty order on glycine from 3 See ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Acting Director, Office VI, Antidumping and
the People’s Republic of China (the Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Countervailing Duty Operations, through Angelica
PRC) covering the period of review Review: Glycine from the People’s Republic of Townshend, Program Manager, Office VI,
China; 2013–2014’’ from Gary Taverman, Associate Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
(POR) from March 1, 2013, through Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and from Ericka Ukrow, International Trade Compliance
February 28, 2014. The administrative Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Analyst, Office VI, titled ‘‘Antidumping Duty
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Administrative Review of Glycine from the People’s
6 See Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof Compliance, dated concurrently with this notice Republic of China; 2013–2014: Bona Fide Nature of
From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), for a Evonik Rexim (Nanning) Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.’s
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011– complete description of the scope of the order. Sales,’’ dated concurrently and hereby adopted by
2012, 79 FR 44008 (July 29, 2014). 4 See Order. this notice (Evonik’s Bona Fide Memorandum).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:55 Apr 07, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM 08APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_18881/page/1.svg)
![18816 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 67 / Wednesday, April 8, 2015 / Notices
review period. Failure to comply with September 30, 2014.1 We gave steel nails subject to the order are
this requirement could result in the interested parties an opportunity to currently classified under the
Department’s presumption that comment on the Preliminary Results. Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
reimbursement of antidumping duties Based upon our analysis of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) subheadings
occurred and the subsequent assessment comments and information received, we 7317.00.55, 7317.00.65, 7317.00.75, and
of double antidumping duties. made changes to the margin calculations 7907.00.6000.5 While the HTSUS
We are issuing and publishing these for these final results. The final subheadings are provided for
results in accordance with sections dumping margins are listed below in the convenience and customs purposes, the
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 ‘‘Final Results of the Administrative written description of the scope of the
CFR 351.213. Review’’ section of this notice. The order is dispositive.6
Dated: March 31, 2015. period of review (‘‘POR’’) is August 1,
Analysis of Comments Received
2012, through July 31, 2013.
Paul Piquado, All issues raised in the case and
DATES: Effective Date: April 8, 2015.
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and rebuttal briefs by parties in this review
Compliance. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Matthew Renkey or Susan Pulongbarit, are addressed in the Issues and Decision
Appendix I AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Memorandum. A list of the issues which
Enforcement and Compliance, parties raised is attached to this notice
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary as an appendix. The Issues and Decision
Decision Memorandum International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Memorandum is a public document and
1. Summary is on file in the Central Records Unit
2. Background Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone 202– (‘‘CRU’’), Room 7046 of the main
3. Scope of the Order
482–2312 or 202–482–4031, Department of Commerce building, as
4. Discussion of the Methodology
5. Bona Fides Inquiry respectively. well as electronically via Enforcement
6. Non-Market Economy Country Status and Compliance’s Antidumping and
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Countervailing Duty Centralized
7. Separate Rates Determination
A. Absence of De Jure Control Background Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’).7
B. Absence of De Facto Control ACCESS is available to registered users
8. The PRC-Wide Entity The Department published the at http://access.trade.gov and in the
9. Surrogate Country Preliminary Results on September 30, CRU. In addition, a complete version of
A. Economic Comparability 2014.2 On February 9, 2015, we released the Issues and Decision Memorandum
B. Significant Producer of Comparable the sales and factors of production can be accessed directly on the Internet
Merchandise (‘‘FOP’’) verification reports for at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/
C. Data Availability Stanley.3 Between February 12 and
10. Date of Sale index.html. The signed Issues and
February 24, 2015, interested parties Decision Memorandum and the
11. Fair Value Comparisons submitted case and rebuttal briefs. On
A. Export Price electronic version of the Issues and
January 20, 2015, the Department Decision Memorandum are identical in
B. Value-Added Tax
C. Normal Value extended the deadline for the final content.
12. Factor Valuation Methodology results to March 30, 2015.4
A. ME Prices Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Scope of the Order
B. Surrogate Values Based on a review of the record and
13. Comparisons to Normal Value The merchandise covered by the order comments received from interested
A. Determination of Comparison Method includes certain steel nails having a parties regarding our Preliminary
B. Results of the Differential Pricing shaft length up to 12 inches. Certain Results, and for the reasons explained in
Analysis
the Issues and Decision Memorandum,
14. Currency Conversion 1 See Certain Steel from the People’s Republic of
15. Recommendation we revised the margin calculation for
China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR Stanley. Accordingly, for the final
[FR Doc. 2015–07952 Filed 4–7–15; 8:45 am]
58744 (September 30, 2014) (‘‘Preliminary results, the Department has updated the
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Results’’), and accompanying Preliminary Decision margin to be assigned to companies
Memorandum.
2 See Preliminary Results.
5 The Department recently added the Harmonized
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 3 The Stanley Works (Langfang) Fastening
Tariff Schedule category 7907.00.6000, ‘‘Other
Systems Co., Ltd. and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. articles of zinc: Other,’’ to the language of the
International Trade Administration (collectively ‘‘Stanley’’); see the memoranda to the Order. See Memorandum to Gary Taverman, Senior
file ‘‘Verification of the Questionnaire Responses of Advisor for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (‘‘SBD’’) in the 2012– Operations, through James C. Doyle, Director, Office
[A–570–909] 2013 Antidumping Duty Review of Certain Steel 9, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Nails from the People’s Republic of China Operations, regarding ‘‘Certain Steel Nails from the
Certain Steel Nails from the People’s (‘‘PRC’’),’’ and Verification of the Questionnaire People’s Republic of China: Cobra Anchors Co. Ltd.
Republic of China: Final Results of Responses of The Stanley Works (Langfang) Final Scope Ruling,’’ dated September 19, 2013.
Fastening Systems Co., Ltd. (‘‘Stanley Langfang’’) in 6 See ‘‘Certain Steel Nails from the People’s
Antidumping Duty Administrative the 2012–2013 Antidumping Duty Review of Republic of China: Issues and Decision
Review; 2012–2013 Certain Steel Nails from the People’s Republic of Memorandum for the Final Results of the Fifth
China (‘‘PRC’’), both dated February 9, 2015. Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
4 See Memorandum to Gary Taverman, Associate concurrently with and hereby adopted by this
International Trade Administration, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and notice (‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum’’), for a
Department of Commerce. Countervailing Duty Operations, through James C. complete description of the Scope of the Order.
Doyle, Director, Office V, Antidumping and 7 On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
Countervailing Duty Operations from Matthew Compliance changed the name of its centralized
(‘‘Department’’) published the Renkey, Senior International Trade Compliance electronic service system to ACCESS. The Web site
Preliminary Results of the fifth Analyst, Office V, Antidumping and Countervailing location was changed from http://iaaccess.trade.gov
administrative review of certain steel Duty Operations regarding Certain Steel Nails from to http://access.trade.gov. The Final Rule changing
the People’s Republic of China: Extension of the references to the centralized electronic service
nails (‘‘nails’’) from the People’s Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty system to ACCESS in the Department’s regulations
Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) on Administrative Review, dated January 20, 2015. can be found at 79 FR 69046 (November 20, 2014).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:55 Apr 07, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM 08APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_18881/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-21 10:07:13
Document Modified: 2018-02-21 10:07:13
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective Date: April 8, 2015. | |
| Contact | Dena Crossland or Ericka Ukrow, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 3362 or (202) 482-0405, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 18814 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR