80 FR 19278 - Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 69 (April 10, 2015)

Page Range19278-19279
FR Document2015-08331

On October 7, 2014, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the Preliminary Results of the antidumping duty administrative review of certain lined paper products (CLPP) from India, and provided interested parties an opportunity to comment on the Preliminary Results.\1\ The review covers one mandatory respondent, Super Impex. The period of review (POR) is September 1, 2012, through August 31, 2013. Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have made certain changes in the margin calculation for Super Impex. The final results, consequently, differ from the Preliminary Results. The final weighted-average dumping margin for Super Impex is listed below in the section entitled ``Final Results of Review.'' In addition, we continue to find that A.R. Printing & Packaging (India) Pvt. Ltd. (AR Printing) had no shipments of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 69 (Friday, April 10, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 69 (Friday, April 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19278-19279]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08331]



[[Page 19278]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-533-843]


Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On October 7, 2014, the Department of Commerce (the 
Department) published the Preliminary Results of the antidumping duty 
administrative review of certain lined paper products (CLPP) from 
India, and provided interested parties an opportunity to comment on the 
Preliminary Results.\1\ The review covers one mandatory respondent, 
Super Impex. The period of review (POR) is September 1, 2012, through 
August 31, 2013. Based on our analysis of the comments received, we 
have made certain changes in the margin calculation for Super Impex. 
The final results, consequently, differ from the Preliminary Results. 
The final weighted-average dumping margin for Super Impex is listed 
below in the section entitled ``Final Results of Review.'' In addition, 
we continue to find that A.R. Printing & Packaging (India) Pvt. Ltd. 
(AR Printing) had no shipments of subject merchandise to the United 
States during the POR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Notice of 
Partial Rescission and Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR 60450 (October 7, 2014) 
(Preliminary Results).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: April 10, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cindy Robinson or Eric Greynolds, AD/
CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-3797 
or (202) 482-6071, respectively.

Background

    On October 7, 2014, the Department published the Preliminary 
Results. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii), we invited 
parties to comment on our Preliminary Results.
    On November 4, 2014, Super Impex submitted its case brief. On 
November 7, 2014, Petitioners submitted their case brief.\2\ On 
November 12, 2014, Super Impex and Petitioners submitted their rebuttal 
briefs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Petitioners are the Association of American School Paper 
Suppliers (AASPS) and its individual members, which consists of the 
following companies: ACCO Brands USA LLC, Norcom Inc., and Top 
Flight, Inc. See, e.g., Petitioners' letter dated September 24, 
2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On January 22, 2015, the Department issued a memorandum extending 
the time period for issuing the final results of this administrative 
review to April 6, 2015.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant 
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, 
``Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Extension of Time Limit 
for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-
2013,'' (January 22, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by the CLPP Order \4\ is certain lined 
paper products. The product is currently classified under the following 
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings: 
4811.90.9035, 4811.90.9080, 4820.30.0040, 4810.22.5044, 4811.90.9050, 
4811.90.9090, 4820.10.2010, 4820.10.2020, 4820.10.2030, 4820.10.2040, 
4820.10.2050, 4820.10.2060, and 4820.10.4000. Although the HTSUS 
numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written 
product description remains dispositive.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less 
Than Fair Value: Certain Lined Paper Products from the People's 
Republic of China; Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Lined 
Paper Products From India, Indonesia and the People's Republic of 
China; and Notice of Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper 
Products From India and Indonesia, 71 FR 56949 (September 28, 2006) 
(CLPP Order).
    \5\ For a complete description of the scope of the order, see 
``Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Issues and Decision 
Memorandum for the Final Results of the Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review; 2012-2013,'' (Issues and Decision 
Memorandum), dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this 
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to 
this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum. A list of the issues that parties raised and to which we 
responded is attached to this notice as Appendix. The Issues and 
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically 
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).\6\ ACCESS is available 
to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and in the Central 
Records Unit (CRU), Room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce 
building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at http://trade.gov/enforcement. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and 
the electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are 
identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and Compliance changed the 
name of Enforcement and Compliance's AD and CVD Centralized 
Electronic Service System (``IA ACCESS'') to AD and CVD Centralized 
Electronic Service System (``ACCESS''). The Web site location was 
changed from http://iaaccess.trade.gov to http://access.trade.gov. 
The Final Rule changing the references to the Regulations can be 
found at 79 FR 69046 (November 20, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

No Shipment Claim by AR Printing

    Based on AR Printing's assertion of no shipments and no information 
received to the contrary from CBP, we preliminarily determined that AR 
Printing had no shipments to the United States during the POR.\7\ We 
received no information or arguments from interested parties that 
warrants a different finding in these final results. Therefore, for 
these final results, we continue to find that AR Printing had no 
shipments to the United States during the POR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Preliminary Results, 79 FR at 60451.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In our Assessment Clarification notice, we explained that, where 
respondents in an administrative review demonstrate that they had no 
knowledge of sales through resellers to the United States, we would 
instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the all-others rate 
applicable to the proceeding.\8\ In accordance with the Assessment 
Clarification, we have taken this approach with regard to any subject 
merchandise produced by AR Printing that entered the United States 
during the POR via resellers without the knowledge of AR Printing. For 
further information, see the ``Assessment'' section of this notice 
below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) 
(Assessment Clarification).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on a review of the record and comments received from 
interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, we recalculated 
Super Impex's weighted-average dumping margin for these final results. 
Specifically, we revised the constructed value profit and selling 
expense ratios based on a different source of surrogate financial data. 
Additionally, we imputed an interest expense with regard to certain 
interest-free loans that Super Impex received from an affiliate that 
were outstanding during the POR using interest rate information on 
prime lending rates from the State Bank of India. We also recalculated 
the factory

[[Page 19279]]

rent that Super Impex paid to one of its affiliates using market rental 
rates provided by Petitioners, and using market rental rates provided 
by Petitioners we assigned a rental expense with regard to rent-free 
office space provided to Super Impex during the POR by an affiliate.

Final Results of the Review

    As a result of this review, the Department determines the following 
dumping margin for Super Impex during the POR:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       Weighted-average
                 Producer/exporter                      dumping margin
                                                          (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Super Impex........................................                0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    We will disclose calculation memoranda used in our analysis to 
parties to these proceedings within five days of the date of 
publication of this notice.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment

    In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212 and the Final Modification,\10\ 
the Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 
to liquidate all appropriate entries for Super Impex without regard to 
antidumping duties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 
Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 (February 14, 
2012) (Final Modification).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Consistent with the Department's refinement to its assessment 
practice, for entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by 
Super Impex for which it did not know that the merchandise was destined 
for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate un-reviewed 
entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate 
company(ies) involved in the transaction.\11\ Similarly, with regard to 
any subject merchandise produced by AR Printing that entered the United 
States during the POR via resellers without the knowledge of AR 
Printing, we will instruct CBP to liquidate un-reviewed entries at the 
all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) 
involved in the transaction.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Assessment Clarification.
    \12\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of 
the final results of this review.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for 
all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication of the final 
results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2) 
of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Super Impex will be the rate 
established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for 
merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this 
administrative review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, 
the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company specific rate 
published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; 
(3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior 
review, or the original investigation, but the manufacturer is, the 
cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently 
completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of the 
subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 
manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 3.91 percent, the all-
others rate established in the original antidumping investigation.\13\ 
These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect 
until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See CLPP Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 
the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties prior to 
liquidation of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred and 
the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of 
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction 
of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an 
APO is a sanctionable violation.
    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h).

    Dated: April 3, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

APPENDIX

I. Summary
II. List of Comments
III. Background
IV. No Shipment Claim by AR Printing
V. Scope of the Order
VI. Analysis of Comments
    Comment 1: Selection of Financial Statements for Constructed 
Value (CV) Profit and Selling Expenses Rates Calculation
    Comment 2: Whether Super Impex Reduced its Direct Material Costs 
by Improper Inventory Adjustments
    Comment 3: Whether Certain Indirect Selling Expenses Should be 
Reclassified as General and Administrative (G&A) Expenses
    Comment 4: Valuation of Super Impex's Affiliated Party 
Transactions
    Comment 5: Whether Super Impex Failed to Report Certain Sales to 
the United States
    Comment 6: Selection of Proper Interest Rate for Imputed Credit 
Expense Calculation
    Comment 7: Whether Super Impex Should Exclude Certain 
Electricity Bills Paid during the POR
VII. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2015-08331 Filed 4-9-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


Current View
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
DatesEffective Date: April 10, 2015.
ContactCindy Robinson or Eric Greynolds, AD/ CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-3797 or (202) 482-6071, respectively.
FR Citation80 FR 19278 

2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR