80 FR 19637 - Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; Calendar Year 2012
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 70 (April 13, 2015)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 70 (April 13, 2015)
| Page Range | 19637-19638 | |
| FR Document | 2015-08423 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 70 (Monday, April 13, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 19637-19638] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-08423] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C-533-844] Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; Calendar Year 2012 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) completed the administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on certain lined paper products from India for the January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2012, period of review (POR) \1\ in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). The respondent in this administrative review is A.R. Printing & Packaging India Private Limited (AR Printing).\2\ In these final results, the Department made changes to the subsidy rate determined for AR Printing. Our analysis of comments received is contained in the Decision Memorandum accompanying this Federal Register notice.\3\ The final net subsidy rate for AR Printing is listed below in the ``Final Results of Review'' section. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ The Department published its preliminary results for this administrative review in Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; Calendar Year 2012, 79 FR 60447 (October 7, 2014) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum, dated September 30, 2014 (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). \2\ AR Printing is also known as A.R. Printing & Packaging (India) Pvt. Ltd. \3\ See ``Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Countervailing Duty Review: Certain Lined Paper Products from India'' from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance (Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently and hereby adopted by this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATES: Effective Date: April 13, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Conniff, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482- 1009. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On September 28, 2006, the Department published in the Federal Register the CVD order on certain lined paper products from India.\4\ On October 7, 2014, the Department published the Preliminary Results of administrative review of the Lined Paper Order for the POR.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Lined Paper Products from the People's Republic of China: Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper Products from India, Indonesia and the People's Republic of China; and Notice of Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper Products from India and Indonesia, 71 FR 56949 (September 28, 2006) (Lined Paper Order). \5\ See Preliminary Results. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- After the Preliminary Results, we issued a third supplemental questionnaire providing the Government of India (GOI) with an opportunity to describe the steps on which it based its claims that AR Printing did not use certain subsidy programs at issue in the review,\6\ to which the GOI responded on October 31, 2014.\7\ On March 4, 2015, we conducted verification at the GOI offices in New Delhi, India.\8\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See the Department's October 10, 2014, Third Supplemental Questionnaire to the GOI. \7\ See the GOI's October 31, 2014, Third Supplemental Questionnaire Response. \8\ See Memorandum to Eric B. Greynolds, Program Manager, AD/CVD Duty Operations, Office III, ``Verification of the Questionnaire Responses Submitted by the Government of India,'' (March 4, 2015). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Petitioner \9\ submitted a case brief on March 11, 2015,\10\ and the GOI submitted a rebuttal brief on March 16, 2015.\11\ No interested party requested a hearing. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ Petitioner is the Association of American School Paper Suppliers (Petitioner). \10\ See Petitioner' March 11, 2015, case brief. \11\ See the GOI's March 16, 2015, rebuttal brief. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order is certain lined paper products. The products are currently classifiable under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) item numbers: 4811.90.9035, 4811.90.9080, 4820.30.0040, 4810.22.5044, 4811.90.9050, 4811.90.9090, 4820.10.2010, 4820.10.2020, 4820.10.2030, 4820.10.2040, 4820.10.2050, 4820.10.2060, and 4820.10.4000. Although the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written product description remains dispositive. A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ``Countervailing Duty (CVD) Administrative Review: Certain Lined Paper Products from India.'' The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).\12\ ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and Compliance changed the name of Enforcement and Compliance's AD and CVD Centralized Electronic Service System (``IA ACCESS'') to AD and CVD Centralized Electronic Service System (``ACCESS''). The Web site location was changed from http://iaaccess.trade.gov to http://access.trade.gov. The Final Rule changing the references to the Regulations can be found at 79 FR 69046 (November 20, 2014). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology The Department has conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For each of the subsidy programs found countervailable, we find that there is a subsidy, i.e., a government-provided financial contribution that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is specific.\13\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 19638]] In making these findings, we relied, in part, on facts otherwise available on the administrative record because AR Printing: (1) Failed to respond to the Department's requests for necessary information and therefore necessary information was not on the record; (2) withheld requested information; (3) failed to provide requested information by the established deadlines; and (4) significantly impeded this proceeding. See sections 776(a)(1) and (2)(A)-(C) of the Act. Furthermore, because we determine that AR Printing failed to cooperate by not acting to the best of its ability to comply with the Department's requests for information, we drew an adverse inference in selecting from among the facts otherwise available. See section 776(b) of the Act. Changes Since Preliminary Results After the Preliminary Results, the Department verified information from the GOI concerning the Market Development Assistance, Status Certificate, and Market Access Initiative programs.\14\ Based on the findings at verification and for the reasons set forth in the Decision Memorandum, we find that AR Printing did not use these three programs during the POR. Therefore, we did not include subsidy rates for these programs when determining the AFA attributable to AR Printing. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ See Memorandum to Eric B. Greynolds, Program Manager, AD/ CVD Duty Operations, Office III, ``Verification of the Questionnaire Responses Submitted by the Government of India,'' (March 4, 2015) (GOI Verification Report). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For a full description of the analysis concerning the Status Certificate, Market Access Initiative, and Market Development programs, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which also incorporates by reference our analysis from the Preliminary Results pertaining to other programs for which the Department's analysis and determinations have not changed. For all other issues, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Final Results of Review In accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5), we calculated the listed net subsidy rate for 2012: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Company Net subsidy rate ------------------------------------------------------------------------ A.R. Printing & Packaging India Pvt. Ltd. 37.43 percent ad valorem. (AR Printing). ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Assessment Rates The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 15 days after publication of these final results of review, to liquidate shipments of subject merchandise produced and/or exported by AR Printing, entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2012, at the ad valorem rate listed above. Cash Deposit Instructions The Department intends to instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated CVDs in the amount shown above for AR Printing on shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of these final results of review. For all non-reviewed firms, we will instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated CVDs at the most recent company-specific or all-others rate applicable to the company. Accordingly, the cash deposit requirements that will be applied to companies covered by this order, but not examined in this review, are those established in the most recently completed segment of the proceeding for each company. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Administrative Protective Order This notice serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: April 6, 2015. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I. Summary II. Analysis of Programs Programs Determined to be Countervailable A. Programs Addressed in the Preliminary Results 1. Advance Authorization Program (AAP) 2. Export Promotion of Capital Goods Scheme (EPCGS) 3. Pre- and Post-Shipment Loans 4. Export Oriented Units (EOUs) 5. State Government of Maharashtra (SGOM) Programs A. Sales Tax Incentives Provided by SGOM B. Electricity Duties Exemptions Under the SGOM Package Program of Incentives of 1993 C. Loan Guarantees Based on Octroi Refunds by the SGOM D. Land for Less than Adequate Remuneration (LTAR) B. Changes from the Preliminary Results III. Analysis of Comments Comment 1: Whether the Department Should Continue to Find Pursuant to Adverse Facts Available that AR Printing Benefited from the Status Certificate Program, Market Access Initiative Program and Market Development Assistance Programs During the POR IV. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2015-08423 Filed 4-10-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Notices 19637
a. The Appropriate Unit of Measure On Federal Register notice.3 The final net Scope of the Order
Which to Base Sales and Cost Data for subsidy rate for AR Printing is listed
King Young The merchandise subject to the order
below in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ is certain lined paper products. The
b. Limiting the Model Matching section.
Methodology for Width and Length products are currently classifiable under
c. Allegation That King Young’s Piece DATES: Effective Date: April 13, 2015. the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
Sales Are Outside the Ordinary Course of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John United States (HTSUS) item numbers:
Trade Conniff, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, 4811.90.9035, 4811.90.9080,
d. Allegation That King Young’s Channel 3 Enforcement and Compliance, 4820.30.0040, 4810.22.5044,
Sales Are Outside the Ordinary Course of International Trade Administration, 4811.90.9050, 4811.90.9090,
Trade 4820.10.2010, 4820.10.2020,
e. Level of Trade for King Young
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 4820.10.2030, 4820.10.2040,
f. Clerical Error in King Young’s
Preliminary Dumping Margin Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 4820.10.2050, 4820.10.2060, and
g. King Young’s Unaffiliated Suppliers’ 482–1009. 4820.10.4000. Although the HTSUS
Cost of Production SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
numbers are provided for convenience
h. General and Administrative Expense and customs purposes, the written
Ratio for King Young Background product description remains dispositive.
i. Financial Expenses for King Young
On September 28, 2006, the A full description of the scope of the
j. Labor and Overhead Ratios for King order is contained in the memorandum
Young Department published in the Federal
Register the CVD order on certain lined from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
k. King Young’s Allocation of Fixed Secretary for Antidumping and
Overhead Costs paper products from India.4 On October
7, 2014, the Department published the Countervailing Duty Operations to Paul
l. AFA Rate for Hen Hao
6. Recommendation Preliminary Results of administrative Piquado, Assistant Secretary for
review of the Lined Paper Order for the Enforcement and Compliance,
[FR Doc. 2015–08436 Filed 4–10–15; 8:45 am]
POR.5 ‘‘Countervailing Duty (CVD)
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Administrative Review: Certain Lined
After the Preliminary Results, we
issued a third supplemental Paper Products from India.’’ The Issues
questionnaire providing the and Decision Memorandum is a public
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE document and is on file electronically
Government of India (GOI) with an
International Trade Administration opportunity to describe the steps on via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
which it based its claims that AR
Centralized Electronic Service System
[C–533–844] Printing did not use certain subsidy
(ACCESS).12 ACCESS is available to
programs at issue in the review,6 to
Certain Lined Paper Products From registered users at http://
which the GOI responded on October
India: Final Results of Countervailing access.trade.gov and is available to all
31, 2014.7 On March 4, 2015, we
Duty Administrative Review; Calendar parties in the Central Records Unit,
conducted verification at the GOI offices
Year 2012 room 7046 of the main Department of
in New Delhi, India.8
Commerce building. In addition, a
Petitioner 9 submitted a case brief on
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, complete version of the Issues and
March 11, 2015,10 and the GOI
International Trade Administration, Decision Memorandum can be accessed
submitted a rebuttal brief on March 16, directly on the Internet at http://
Department of Commerce.
2015.11 No interested party requested a enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
hearing. The signed Issues and Decision
(the Department) completed the
administrative review of the 3 See ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Final
Memorandum and the electronic
countervailing duty (CVD) order on Results of Countervailing Duty Review: Certain version of the Issues and Decision
certain lined paper products from India Lined Paper Products from India’’ from Christian Memorandum are identical in content.
for the January 1, 2012, through Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Methodology
December 31, 2012, period of review Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
(POR) 1 in accordance with section The Department has conducted this
Compliance (Decision Memorandum), dated
751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as concurrently and hereby adopted by this notice. review in accordance with section
amended (the Act). The respondent in 4 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
this administrative review is A.R. Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Lined Paper amended (the Act). For each of the
Products from the People’s Republic of China: subsidy programs found
Printing & Packaging India Private Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Lined
Limited (AR Printing).2 In these final countervailable, we find that there is a
Paper Products from India, Indonesia and the
results, the Department made changes to People’s Republic of China; and Notice of subsidy, i.e., a government-provided
the subsidy rate determined for AR Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper financial contribution that gives rise to
Printing. Our analysis of comments
Products from India and Indonesia, 71 FR 56949 a benefit to the recipient, and that the
(September 28, 2006) (Lined Paper Order). subsidy is specific.13
received is contained in the Decision 5 See Preliminary Results.
Memorandum accompanying this 6 See the Department’s October 10, 2014, Third
12 On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and
Supplemental Questionnaire to the GOI.
7 See the GOI’s October 31, 2014, Third
Compliance changed the name of Enforcement and
1 The Department published its preliminary Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized Electronic
results for this administrative review in Certain Supplemental Questionnaire Response. Service System (‘‘IA ACCESS’’) to AD and CVD
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
8 See Memorandum to Eric B. Greynolds, Program
Lined Paper Products from India: Preliminary Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’).
Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Manager, AD/CVD Duty Operations, Office III, The Web site location was changed from http://
Review; Calendar Year 2012, 79 FR 60447 (October ‘‘Verification of the Questionnaire Responses iaaccess.trade.gov to http://access.trade.gov. The
7, 2014) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Submitted by the Government of India,’’ (March 4, Final Rule changing the references to the
Issues and Decision Memorandum, dated 2015). Regulations can be found at 79 FR 69046
9 Petitioner is the Association of American School
September 30, 2014 (Preliminary Decision (November 20, 2014).
Memorandum). Paper Suppliers (Petitioner). 13 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act
2 AR Printing is also known as A.R. Printing & 10 See Petitioner’ March 11, 2015, case brief.
regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E)
Packaging (India) Pvt. Ltd. 11 See the GOI’s March 16, 2015, rebuttal brief. Continued
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:02 Apr 10, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13APN1.SGM 13APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_19707/page/1.svg)
![19638 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Notices
In making these findings, we relied, in Assessment Rates 3. Pre- and Post-Shipment Loans
part, on facts otherwise available on the 4. Export Oriented Units (EOUs)
The Department intends to issue 5. State Government of Maharashtra
administrative record because AR appropriate assessment instructions (SGOM) Programs
Printing: (1) Failed to respond to the directly to U.S. Customs and Border A. Sales Tax Incentives Provided by SGOM
Department’s requests for necessary Protection (CBP) 15 days after B. Electricity Duties Exemptions Under the
information and therefore necessary publication of these final results of SGOM Package Program of Incentives of
information was not on the record; (2) review, to liquidate shipments of subject 1993
withheld requested information; (3) merchandise produced and/or exported C. Loan Guarantees Based on Octroi
failed to provide requested information by AR Printing, entered, or withdrawn Refunds by the SGOM
by the established deadlines; and (4) D. Land for Less than Adequate
from warehouse, for consumption on or
Remuneration (LTAR)
significantly impeded this proceeding. after January 1, 2012, through December B. Changes from the Preliminary Results
See sections 776(a)(1) and (2)(A)–(C) of 31, 2012, at the ad valorem rate listed III. Analysis of Comments
the Act. Furthermore, because we above. Comment 1: Whether the Department
determine that AR Printing failed to Cash Deposit Instructions Should Continue to Find Pursuant to
cooperate by not acting to the best of its Adverse Facts Available that AR Printing
ability to comply with the Department’s The Department intends to instruct Benefited from the Status Certificate
requests for information, we drew an CBP to collect cash deposits of Program, Market Access Initiative
estimated CVDs in the amount shown Program and Market Development
adverse inference in selecting from Assistance Programs During the POR
among the facts otherwise available. See above for AR Printing on shipments of
subject merchandise entered, or IV. Recommendation
section 776(b) of the Act. [FR Doc. 2015–08423 Filed 4–10–15; 8:45 am]
withdrawn from warehouse, for
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Changes Since Preliminary Results consumption on or after the date of
publication of these final results of
After the Preliminary Results, the review. For all non-reviewed firms, we
Department verified information from DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
will instruct CBP to collect cash
the GOI concerning the Market deposits of estimated CVDs at the most National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Development Assistance, Status recent company-specific or all-others Administration
Certificate, and Market Access Initiative rate applicable to the company.
programs.14 Based on the findings at Accordingly, the cash deposit Submission for OMB Review;
verification and for the reasons set forth requirements that will be applied to Comment Request
in the Decision Memorandum, we find companies covered by this order, but
that AR Printing did not use these three not examined in this review, are those The Department of Commerce will
programs during the POR. Therefore, we established in the most recently submit to the Office of Management and
did not include subsidy rates for these completed segment of the proceeding Budget (OMB) for clearance the
programs when determining the AFA for each company. These cash deposit following proposal for collection of
requirements, when imposed, shall information under the provisions of the
attributable to AR Printing.
remain in effect until further notice. Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
For a full description of the analysis Chapter 35).
concerning the Status Certificate, Administrative Protective Order Agency: National Oceanic and
Market Access Initiative, and Market This notice serves as a reminder to Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
Development programs, see the Issues parties subject to administrative Title: West Coast Region Vessel
and Decision Memorandum, which also protective order (APO) of their Identification Requirements.
incorporates by reference our analysis responsibility concerning the OMB Control Number: 0648-0355.
from the Preliminary Results pertaining disposition of proprietary information Form Number(s): None.
to other programs for which the Type of Request: Regular (extension of
disclosed under APO in accordance
Department’s analysis and a currently approved information
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
determinations have not changed. For collection).
written notification of return or
all other issues, see the Preliminary Number of Respondents: 1,125.
destruction of APO materials or Average Hours Per Response: 45
Decision Memorandum. conversion to judicial protective order is minutes.
hereby requested. Failure to comply Burden Hours: 169.
Final Results of Review
with the regulations and the terms of an Needs and Uses: This request is for
In accordance with 19 CFR APO is a sanctionable violation. extension of a currently approved
351.221(b)(5), we calculated the listed We are issuing and publishing these information collection.
net subsidy rate for 2012: results in accordance with sections The success of fisheries management
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. programs depends significantly on
Net subsidy Dated: April 6, 2015. regulatory compliance. The vessel
Company rate Ronald K. Lorentzen, identification requirement is essential to
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement facilitate enforcement. The ability to
A.R. Printing & Packaging 37.43 percent and Compliance. link fishing (or other activity) to the
India Pvt. Ltd. (AR Print- ad valorem.
vessel owner or operator is crucial to
ing). Appendix
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
enforcement of regulations issued under
I. Summary the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens
of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of
II. Analysis of Programs Fishery Conservation and Management
the Act regarding specificity. Programs Determined to be Countervailable Act. A vessel’s official number is
14 See Memorandum to Eric B. Greynolds, A. Programs Addressed in the Preliminary
Results required to be displayed on the port and
Program Manager, AD/CVD Duty Operations, Office
III, ‘‘Verification of the Questionnaire Responses 1. Advance Authorization Program (AAP) starboard sides of the deckhouse or hull,
Submitted by the Government of India,’’ (March 4, 2. Export Promotion of Capital Goods and on a weather deck. It identifies each
2015) (GOI Verification Report). Scheme (EPCGS) vessel and should be visible at distances
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:02 Apr 10, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13APN1.SGM 13APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_19707/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-18 11:21:36
Document Modified: 2015-12-18 11:21:36
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Contact | John Conniff, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482- 1009. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 19637 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR