80 FR 19889 - Special Conditions: Honda Aircraft Company, Model HA-420 HondaJet, Lithium-Ion Batteries
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 71 (April 14, 2015)
Federal Aviation Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 71 (April 14, 2015)
| Page Range | 19889-19892 | |
| FR Document | 2015-08586 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 71 (Tuesday, April 14, 2015)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 19889-19892] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-08586] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 23 [Docket No. FAA-2015-0721; Notice No. 23-15-03-SC] Special Conditions: Honda Aircraft Company, Model HA-420 HondaJet, Lithium-Ion Batteries AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed special conditions. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This action proposes special conditions for the Honda Aircraft Company, Model HA-420 airplane. This airplane will have a novel or unusual design feature associated with the installation of lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries. The applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for this design feature. These proposed special conditions contain the additional safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards. DATES: Send your comments on or before May 4, 2015. ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number [FAA-2015-0721] using any of the following methods: [ssquf] Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your comments electronically. [ssquf] Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30, U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001. [ssquf] Hand Delivery of Courier: Take comments to Docket Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m., and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. [ssquf] Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at 202-493-2251. Privacy: The FAA will post all comments it receives, without change, to http://regulations.gov, including any personal information the commenter provides. Using the search function of the docket Web site, anyone can find and read the electronic form of all comments received into any FAA docket, including the name of the individual sending the comment (or signing the comment for an association, business, labor union, etc.). DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement can be found in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-19478), as well as at http://DocketsInfo.dot.gov. Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at http://www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m., and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Les Lyne, Policies & Procedures Branch, ACE-114, Federal Aviation Administration, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service, 901 Locust; Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone (816) 329-4171; facsimile (816) 329-4090. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments Invited We invite interested people to take part in this rulemaking by sending written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments reference a specific portion of the special conditions, explain the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. We ask that you send us two copies of written comments. We will consider all comments we receive on or before the closing date for comments. We will consider comments filed late if it is possible to do so without incurring expense or delay. We may change these special conditions based on the comments we receive. [[Page 19890]] Background On October 11, 2006, Honda Aircraft Company applied for a type certificate for their new Model HA-420. On October 10, 2013, Honda Aircraft Company requested an extension with an effective application date of October 1, 2013. This extension changed the type certification basis to amendment 23-62. The HA-420 is a four to five passenger (depending on configuration), two crew, lightweight business jet with a 43,000-foot service ceiling and a maximum takeoff weight of 9963 pounds. The airplane is powered by two GE-Honda Aero Engines (GHAE) HF-120 turbofan engines. The current regulatory requirements for part 23 airplanes do not contain adequate requirements for the application of Li-ion batteries in airborne applications. This type of battery possesses certain failure, operational characteristics, and maintenance requirements that differ significantly from that of the nickel cadmium and lead acid rechargeable batteries currently approved in other normal, utility, acrobatic, and commuter category airplanes. Therefore, the FAA is proposing this special condition to require that all characteristics of the rechargeable lithium batteries and their installation that could affect safe operation of the HA-420 are addressed, and appropriate Instructions for Continued Airworthiness which include maintenance requirements are established to ensure the availability of electrical power from the batteries when needed. Type Certification Basis Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.17, Honda Aircraft Company must show that the HA-420 meets the applicable provisions of part 23, as amended by Amendments 23-1 through 23-62 thereto. If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 23) do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for the HA-420 because of a novel or unusual design feature, special conditions are prescribed under the provisions of Sec. 21.16. Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended later to include any other model that incorporates the same or similar novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions would also apply to the other model under Sec. 21.101. In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special conditions, the HA-420 must comply with the fuel vent and exhaust emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34 and the noise certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36, and the FAA must issue a finding of regulatory adequacy under section 611 of Public Law 92-574, the ``Noise Control Act of 1972.'' The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in accordance with Sec. 11.38, and they become part of the type- certification basis under Sec. 21.17(a)(2). Novel or Unusual Design Features The HA-420 will incorporate the following novel or unusual design feature: The installation of Li-ion batteries. The current regulatory requirements for part 23 airplanes do not contain adequate requirements for the application of Li-ion batteries in airborne applications. This type of battery possesses certain failure, operational characteristics, and maintenance requirements that differ significantly from that of the nickel cadmium and lead acid rechargeable batteries currently approved in other normal, utility, acrobatic, and commuter category airplanes. Discussion The applicable parts 21 and 23 airworthiness regulations governing the installation of batteries in general aviation airplanes, including Sec. 23.1353, were derived from Civil Air Regulations (CAR 3) as part of the recodification that established 14 CFR part 23. The battery requirements, which are identified in Sec. 23.1353, were a rewording of the CAR requirements that did not add any substantive technical requirements. An increase in incidents involving battery fires and failures that accompanied the increased use of Nickel-Cadmium (Ni-Cad) batteries in aircraft resulted in rulemaking activities on the battery requirements for transport category airplanes. These regulations were incorporated into Sec. 23.1353(f) and (g), which apply only to Ni-Cad battery installations. The proposed use of Li-ion batteries on the HA-420 airplane has prompted the FAA to review the adequacy of the existing battery regulations with respect to that chemistry. As the result of this review, the FAA has determined that the existing regulations do not adequately address several failure, operational, and maintenance characteristics of Li-ion batteries that could affect safety of the battery installation of the HA-420 airplane electrical power supply. The introduction of Li-ion batteries into aircraft raises some concern about associated battery/cell monitoring systems and how these may affect utilization of an otherwise ``good'' battery as an energy source to the electrical system when monitoring components fail. Associated battery/cell monitoring systems (i.e., temperature, state of charge, etc.) should be evaluated/tested with respect the expected extremes in the aircraft operating environment. Li-ion batteries typically have different electrical impedance characteristics than lead-acid or Ni-Cad batteries. Honda Aircraft Company needs to evaluate other components of the aircraft electrical system with respect to these characteristics. At present, there is very limited experience regarding the use of Li-ion rechargeable batteries in applications involving commercial aviation. However, other users of this technology range from wireless telephone manufacturers to the electric vehicle industry and have noted significant safety issues regarding the use of these types of batteries, some of which are described in the following paragraphs: 1. Overcharging. In general, lithium batteries are significantly more susceptible to internal failures that can result in self- sustaining increases in temperature and pressure (i.e., thermal runaway) than their nickel-cadmium or lead-acid counterparts. This is especially true for overcharging, which causes heating and destabilization of the components of the cell, leading to the formation (by plating) of highly unstable metallic lithium. The metallic lithium can ignite, resulting in a self-sustaining fire or explosion. Finally, the severity of thermal runaway due to overcharging increases with increasing battery capacity due to the higher amount of electrolyte in large batteries. 2. Over-discharging. Discharge of some types of lithium battery cells beyond a certain voltage (typically 2.4 volts) can cause corrosion of the electrodes of the cell; resulting in loss of battery capacity that cannot be reversed by recharging. This loss of capacity may not be detected by the simple voltage measurements commonly available to flight crews as a means of checking battery status--a problem shared with nickel-cadmium batteries. 3. Flammability of Cell Components: Unlike nickel-cadmium and lead- acid batteries, some types of lithium batteries use liquid electrolytes that are flammable. The electrolyte can serve as a source of fuel for an external fire if [[Page 19891]] there is a breach of the battery container. These safety issues experienced by users of lithium batteries raise concern about the use of these batteries in commercial aviation. The intent of the proposed special condition is to establish appropriate airworthiness standards for lithium battery installations in the HA-420 and to ensure, as required by Sec. Sec. 23.1309 and 23.601, that these battery installations are not hazardous or unreliable. Additionally, the Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics (RTCA), in a joint effort with the FAA and industry, has released RTCA/ DO-311, Minimum Operational Performance Standards for Rechargeable Lithium Battery Systems, which gained much of its text directly from previous Li-ion special conditions. Honda Aircraft Company proposes to use DO-311 as the primary methodology for assuring the battery will perform its intended functions safely as installed in the HA-420 airplane and as the basis for test and qualification of the battery. This Special Condition incorporates applicable portions of DO-311. Applicability As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the HA-420. Should Honda Aircraft Company apply at a later date for a change to the type certificate to include another model incorporating the same novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions would apply to that model as well. Provisional certification of the HA-420 is currently scheduled for June 2015. The substance of these special conditions has been subject to the notice and public-comment procedure in several prior instances, specifically special conditions 23-236-SC, 23-247-SC, and 23-249-SC. Therefore, because a delay would significantly affect the applicant's both installation of the system and certification of the airplane, we are shortening the public-comment period to 20 days. Conclusion This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features on one model of airplanes. It is not a rule of general applicability. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 23 Aircraft, Aviation safety, Signs and symbols. The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704. The Proposed Special Conditions Accordingly, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) proposes the following special conditions as part of the type certification basis for Honda Aircraft Company, HA-420 airplanes. 1. Lithium-Ion Battery Installation a. Safe cell temperatures and pressures must be maintained during any probable charging or discharging condition, or during any failure of the charging or battery monitoring system not shown to be extremely remote. The applicant must design Li-ion battery installation to preclude explosion or fire in the event of those failures. b. The applicant must design the Li-ion batteries to preclude the occurrence of self-sustaining, uncontrolled increases in temperature or pressure. c. No explosive or toxic gasses emitted by any Li-ion battery in normal operation or as the result of any failure of the battery charging or monitoring system, or battery installation not shown to be extremely remote, may accumulate in hazardous quantities within the airplane. d. Li-ion batteries that contain flammable fluids must comply with the flammable fluid fire protection requirements of Sec. 23.863(a) through (d). e. No corrosive fluids or gasses that may escape from any Li-ion battery may damage surrounding airplane structure or adjacent essential equipment. f. The applicant must provide provision for each installed Li-ion battery to prevent any hazardous effect on structure or essential systems that may be caused by the maximum amount of heat the battery can generate during a short circuit of the battery or of its individual cells. g. Li-ion battery installations must have-- (1) A system to control the charging rate of the battery automatically so as to prevent battery overheating or overcharging; or (2) A battery temperature sensing and over-temperature warning system with a means for automatically disconnecting the battery from its charging source in the event of an over-temperature condition; or (3) A battery failure sensing and warning system with a means for automatically disconnecting the battery from its charging source in the event of battery failure. h. Any Li-ion battery installation whose function is required for safe operation of the airplane, must incorporate a monitoring and warning feature that will provide an indication to the appropriate flightcrew members whenever the capacity and State of Charge (SOC) of the batteries have fallen below levels considered acceptable for dispatch of the airplane. i. The Instructions for Continued Airworthiness (ICA) must contain recommended manufacturers maintenance and inspection requirements to ensure that batteries, including single cells, meet a safety function level essential to the aircraft's continued airworthiness. (1) The ICA must contain operating instructions and equipment limitations in an installation maintenance manual. (2) The ICA must contain installation procedures and limitations in a maintenance manual, sufficient to ensure that cells or batteries, when installed according to the installation procedures, still meet safety functional levels essential to the aircraft's continued airworthiness. The limitations must identify any unique aspects of the installation. (3) The ICA must contain corrective maintenance procedures to check battery capacity at manufacturers recommended inspection intervals. (4) The ICA must contain scheduled servicing information to replace batteries at manufacturers recommended replacement time. (5) The ICA must contain maintenance and inspection requirements to check visually for battery and/or charger degradation. j. Batteries in a rotating stock (spares) that have experienced degraded charge retention capability or other damage due to prolonged storage must be functionally checked at manufacturers recommended inspection intervals. k. The System Safety Assessment (SSA) process should address the software and complex hardware levels for the sensing, monitoring, and warning systems if these systems contain complex devices. The functional hazard assessment (FHA) for the system is required based on the intended functions described. The criticality of the specific functions will be determined by the safety assessment process for compliance with Sec. 23.1309. Advisory Circular 23-1309-1C contains acceptable means for accomplishing this requirement. For determining the failure condition, the criticality of a function will include the mitigating factors. The failure conditions must address the loss of function and improper operations. [[Page 19892]] Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on April 6, 2015. Pat Mullen, Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2015-08586 Filed 4-13-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 71 / Tuesday, April 14, 2015 / Proposed Rules 19889
agree to reinstate the Principal, if the ■ b. Remove the paragraph heading ‘‘(a) Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
Surety has settled its claim with the Indemnity settlements.’’; Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West
Principal, or any of its Affiliates, for an ■ c. Remove paragraphs (b) and (c); and Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
amount that results in no Loss to SBA ■ d. Redesignate paragraphs ‘‘(1)’’, 20590–0001.
or in no amount owed for Imminent ‘‘(2)’’, and ‘‘(3)’’, as ‘‘(a)’’, ‘‘(b)’’, and D Hand Delivery of Courier: Take
Breach payments, or OSG finds good ‘‘(c)’’. comments to Docket Operations in
cause for reinstating the Principal § 115.36 Indemnity settlements. Room W12–140 of the West Building
notwithstanding the Loss to SBA or Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
amount owed for Imminent Breach * * * * *
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9
payments; or § 115.60 Selection and admission of PSB a.m., and 5 p.m., Monday through
(ii) Reinstate a Principal’s eligibility Sureties. [Amended] Friday, except Federal holidays.
upon the Surety’s determination that 8. Amend § 115.60 to read as follows:
further bond guarantees are appropriate
■ D Fax: Fax comments to Docket
■ a. Amend § 115.60(a)(1) by removing Operations at 202–493–2251.
after the Principal was deemed ‘‘$2,000,000’’ and inserting
ineligible for further SBA bond Privacy: The FAA will post all
‘‘$6,500,000’’ in its place; and
guarantees under § 115.14(a) (1), (2), (3), ■ b. Remove paragraph (a)(5) and
comments it receives, without change,
(5) or (6). redesignate paragraph (a)(6) as to http://regulations.gov, including any
(c) Underwriting after reinstatement. paragraph (a)(5). personal information the commenter
A guarantee application submitted after provides. Using the search function of
Dated: April 6, 2015. the docket Web site, anyone can find
reinstatement of the Principal’s
eligibility is subject to a very stringent Maria Contreras-Sweet, and read the electronic form of all
underwriting review. Administrator. comments received into any FAA
■ 5. Amend § 115.16 by revising [FR Doc. 2015–08297 Filed 4–13–15; 8:45 am] docket, including the name of the
paragraphs (e)(1) and (f)(1) to read as BILLING CODE 8025–01–P individual sending the comment (or
follows: signing the comment for an association,
business, labor union, etc.). DOT’s
§ 115.16 Determination of Surety’s Loss. complete Privacy Act Statement can be
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
* * * * * found in the Federal Register published
(e) * * * Federal Aviation Administration on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–19478),
(1) Amounts actually paid by the as well as at http://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
Surety for specialized services that are 14 CFR Part 23 Docket: Background documents or
provided under contract by an outside
[Docket No. FAA–2015–0721; Notice No. 23– comments received may be read at
consultant, which is not an Affiliate of
15–03–SC] http://www.regulations.gov at any time.
the Surety, in connection with the
Follow the online instructions for
processing of a claim, provided that Special Conditions: Honda Aircraft accessing the docket or go to the Docket
such services are beyond the capability Company, Model HA–420 HondaJet, Operations in Room W12–140 of the
of the Surety’s salaried claims staff; and Lithium-Ion Batteries West Building Ground Floor at 1200
* * * * * New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
(f) * * * AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT. DC, between 9 a.m., and 5 p.m., Monday
(1) Any unallocated expenses, all
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
direct and indirect costs incurred by the ACTION: Notice of proposed special
Surety’s salaried claims staff, or any conditions. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Les
clear mark-up on expenses or any Lyne, Policies & Procedures Branch,
overhead of the Surety, its attorney, or SUMMARY: This action proposes special ACE–114, Federal Aviation
any other party hired by the Surety or conditions for the Honda Aircraft Administration, Small Airplane
the attorney; Company, Model HA–420 airplane. This Directorate, Aircraft Certification
airplane will have a novel or unusual Service, 901 Locust; Kansas City,
* * * * * design feature associated with the
■ 6. Amend § 115.18 by revising Missouri 64106; telephone (816) 329–
installation of lithium-ion (Li-ion) 4171; facsimile (816) 329–4090.
paragraph (a)(2) to read as follows:
batteries. The applicable airworthiness
§ 115.18 Refusal to issue further regulations do not contain adequate or SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
guarantees; suspension and termination of appropriate safety standards for this Comments Invited
PSB status. design feature. These proposed special
* * * * * conditions contain the additional safety We invite interested people to take
(2) Regulatory violations, fraud. Acts standards that the Administrator part in this rulemaking by sending
of wrongdoing such as fraud, material considers necessary to establish a level written comments, data, or views. The
misrepresentation, breach of the Prior of safety equivalent to that established most helpful comments reference a
Approval or PSB Agreement, the by the existing airworthiness standards. specific portion of the special
Surety’s failure to continue to comply DATES: Send your comments on or conditions, explain the reason for any
with the requirements set forth in before May 4, 2015. recommended change, and include
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 115.11, or regulatory violations (as ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
supporting data. We ask that you send
defined in §§ 115.19(d) and 115.19(h)) by docket number [FAA–2015–0721] us two copies of written comments.
also constitute sufficient grounds for using any of the following methods: We will consider all comments we
refusal to issue further guarantees, or in D Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to receive on or before the closing date for
the case of a PSB Surety, termination of http://www.regulations.gov and follow comments. We will consider comments
preferred status. the online instructions for sending your filed late if it is possible to do so
* * * * * comments electronically. without incurring expense or delay. We
■ 7. Amend § 115.36 to read as follows: D Mail: Send comments to Docket may change these special conditions
■ a. Revise the section heading; Operations, M–30, U.S. Department of based on the comments we receive.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:05 Apr 13, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\14APP1.SGM 14APP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_19960/page/1.svg)
![19892 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 71 / Tuesday, April 14, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on April p.m., Monday through Friday, except FR 50981, September 24, 1998). AD 98–
6, 2015. Federal holidays. 20–27 requires actions intended to
Pat Mullen, For service information identified in address an unsafe condition on all
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, this proposed AD, contact Airbus SAS, Airbus Model A300 B4–600, B4–600R,
Aircraft Certification Service. Airworthiness Office—EAW, 1 Rond and F4–600R series airplanes, and
[FR Doc. 2015–08586 Filed 4–13–15; 8:45 am] Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Model A300 C4–605R Variant F
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 airplanes (collectively called Model
96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email A300–600 series airplanes).
account.airworth-eas@airbus.com; Since we issued AD 98–20–27,
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Internet http://www.airbus.com. You Amendment 39–10793 (63 FR 50981,
may view this referenced service September 24, 1998): The European
Federal Aviation Administration information at the FAA, Transport Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue is the Technical Agent for the Member
14 CFR Part 39 SW., Renton, WA. For information on States of the European Union, has
[Docket No. FAA–2015–0824; Directorate the availability of this material at the issued EASA Airworthiness Directive
Identifier 2013–NM–191–AD] FAA, call 425–227–1221. 2013–0232R1, dated October 2, 2013
RIN 2120–AA64 Examining the AD Docket (referred to after this as the Mandatory
Continuing Airworthiness Information,
You may examine the AD docket on
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus or ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe
the Internet at http://
Airplanes condition. The MCAI states:
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2015– During full-scale fatigue testing conducted
AGENCY: Federal Aviation in the early 1990’s, cracks were found on the
Administration (FAA), DOT. 0824; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m. top skin of the wing between Ribs 1 and 7,
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking starting at the front spar fastener holes.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
(NPRM). This condition, if not detected and
except Federal holidays. The AD docket corrected, could adversely affect the
SUMMARY: We propose to supersede contains this proposed AD, the structural integrity of the wing.
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 98–20–27, regulatory evaluation, any comments Consequently, Airbus issued Service
for all Airbus Model A300 B4–600, B4– received, and other information. The Bulletin (SB) A300–57–6045 and DGAC
600R, and F4–600R series airplanes, and street address for the Docket Operations [Direction Générale de l’Aviation Civile]
Model A300 C4–605R Variant F office (telephone 800–647–5527) is in France issued AD 97–374–238 [http://
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will ad.easa.europa.eu/blob/19973740tb_
airplanes (collectively called Model superseded.pdf/AD_F-1997-374-238_2] for
A300–600 series airplanes). AD 98–20– be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt. A300–600 aeroplanes and AD 1999–008–020
27 currently requires repetitive [http://ad.easa.europa.eu/blob/19980080tb_
inspections to detect fatigue cracking of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan superseded.pdf/AD_F-1999-008-020_2] for
the wing top skin at the front spar joint; Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, A300–600ST aeroplanes to require repetitive
and a follow-on eddy current inspection International Branch, ANM–116, detailed inspections of the wing top skin and,
and repair, if necessary. Since we issued Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, in case of findings, an Eddy Current (EC)
AD 98–20–27, we have received reports 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA inspection, and, depending on the size of the
98057–3356; telephone 425–227–2125; cracks, repair.
of cracking of the wing top skin in an
fax 425–227–1149. After those [DGAC] ADs were issued,
area not required for inspection by AD further cracks to the wing top skin were
98–20–27. This proposed AD would SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
reported by operators, within an area not
reduce the inspection compliance time Comments Invited covered by the existing [DGAC] ADs. To
and intervals, and extend the inspection address this potential unsafe condition,
area of the wing top skin at the front We invite you to send any written Airbus revised SB A300–57–6045 to extend
spar joint. We are proposing this AD to relevant data, views, or arguments about the area to be inspected.
detect and correct fatigue cracking of the this proposed AD. Send your comments In addition, a fleet survey and updated
wing top skin at the front spar joint, to an address listed under the Fatigue and Damage Tolerance analyses were
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. performed in order to substantiate the second
which could result in reduced structural
FAA–2015–0824; Directorate Identifier A300–600 Extended Service Goal (ESG2)
integrity of the airplane. exercise. The results of these analyses have
2013–NM–191–AD’’ at the beginning of
DATES: We must receive comments on determined that the inspection thresholds
your comments. We specifically invite
this proposed AD by May 29, 2015. and intervals must be reduced to allow
comments on the overall regulatory, timely detection of these cracks and the
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by economic, environmental, and energy
any of the following methods: accomplishment of applicable corrective
aspects of this proposed AD. We will action(s).
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to consider all comments received by the As the ESG2 exercise is only applicable to
http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the closing date and may amend this A300–600 aeroplanes, A300–600ST
instructions for submitting comments. proposed AD based on those comments. aeroplanes are now addressed through new
• Fax: (202) 493–2251. We will post all comments we Airbus SB A300–57–9026.
• Mail: U.S. Department of receive, without change, to http:// For the reasons described above, this
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Transportation, Docket Operations, www.regulations.gov, including any [EASA] AD retains the requirements of DGAC
M–30, West Building Ground Floor, personal information you provide. We France AD 97–374–238(B) [http://
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey ad.easa.europa.eu/blob/19973740tb_
will also post a report summarizing each superseded.pdf/AD_F-1997-374-238_2]
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. substantive verbal contact we receive [which corresponds to FAA AD 98–20–27,
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of about this proposed AD. Amendment 39–10793 (63 FR 50981,
Transportation, Docket Operations, M– September 24, 1998)] and [DGAC] AD 1999–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room Discussion
008–020(B) [http://ad.easa.europa.eu/blob/
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., On September 16, 1998, we issued AD 19980080tb_superseded.pdf/AD_F-1999-008-
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 98–20–27, Amendment 39–10793 (63 020_2], which are superseded, but requires
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:05 Apr 13, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\14APP1.SGM 14APP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_19960/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-18 11:09:35
Document Modified: 2015-12-18 11:09:35
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Notice of proposed special conditions. | |
| Dates | Send your comments on or before May 4, 2015. | |
| Contact | Les Lyne, Policies & Procedures Branch, ACE-114, Federal Aviation Administration, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service, 901 Locust; Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone (816) 329-4171; facsimile (816) 329-4090. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 19889 | |
| CFR Associated | Aircraft; Aviation Safety and Signs and Symbols |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR