80_FR_20129 80 FR 20058 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Credit LLC; Order Granting Approval of Proposed Rule Change To Revise the ICC Risk Management Framework

80 FR 20058 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Credit LLC; Order Granting Approval of Proposed Rule Change To Revise the ICC Risk Management Framework

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 71 (April 14, 2015)

Page Range20058-20060
FR Document2015-08455

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 71 (Tuesday, April 14, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 71 (Tuesday, April 14, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20058-20060]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08455]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-74685; File No. SR-ICC-2014-24]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Credit LLC; Order 
Granting Approval of Proposed Rule Change To Revise the ICC Risk 
Management Framework

April 8, 2015.

I. Introduction

    On December 22, 2014, ICE Clear Credit LLC (``ICC'') filed with the 
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule 
change SR-ICC-2014-24 pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\2\ The 
proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register 
on January 9, 2015.\3\ On February 20, 2015, the Commission extended 
the time period in which to either approve, disapprove, or institute 
proceedings to determine whether to disapprove the proposed rule change 
to April 9, 2015.\4\ The Commission received no comment letters 
regarding the proposed change. For the reasons discussed below, the 
Commission is granting approval of the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-73980 (Jan. 5, 2015), 
80 FR 1466 (Jan. 9, 2015) (SR-ICC-2014-24).
    \4\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-74341 (Feb. 20, 
2015), 80 FR 10551 (Feb. 26, 2015) (SR-ICC-2014-24).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 20059]]

II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change

    ICC proposes revising the ICC Risk Management Framework to 
incorporate risk model enhancements related to Recovery Rate 
Sensitivity Requirements (``RRSR''), anti-procyclicality, and ICC's 
Guaranty Fund (``GF'') allocation methodology. ICC also proposes 
revisions which are intended to remove obsolete references and ensure 
consistency.
    ICC proposes revising its Risk Management Framework to incorporate 
risk model parameter estimation enhancements related to the RRSR 
computations. ICC states that under its current ICC Risk Management 
Framework, recovery rate stress scenarios are explicitly incorporated 
in the RRSR computations and for Jump-to-Default (``JTD'') 
considerations. The quantity RRSR is designed to capture fluctuations 
due to potential changes of the market expected recovery rates. In 
calculating the RRSR, all instruments belonging to a Risk Factor 
(``RF'') or Risk Sub-Factor (``RSF'') are subjected to Recovery Rate 
(``RR'') stress scenarios to obtain resulting Profit/Loss (``P/L'') 
responses, and the worst scenario response is chosen for the estimation 
of the RF/RSF RRSR. The JTD analysis is designed to capture the 
unexpected potential losses associated with credit events for assumed 
single-name-specific set of RR stress values. The JTD responses are 
determined by using minimum and maximum RR levels. Currently, the RRSR 
and JTD computations use the same RR stress levels.
    ICC proposes separating the RR stress levels for these two 
computations in order to introduce more dynamic and appropriate 
estimations of the RR stress levels for RRSR purposes. According to 
ICC, the RR levels for RRSR purposes will reflect a 5-day 99% Expected 
Shortfall (``ES'') equivalent risk measure associated with RR 
fluctuations. The proposal will also, as stated by ICC, eliminate index 
RRSR, as index RRs are not subject to market uncertainty, but rather 
driven by market conventions. ICC states that the dynamic feature of 
the RR stress level estimations is achieved by analyzing historical 
time series of RRs in order to calibrate a statistical model with a 
time varying volatility. Under this approach, ICC calculates, the RRSR 
will capture the exposure to RR fluctuations over a 5-day risk horizon 
described by 99% ES equivalent risk measure.
    Additionally, ICC proposes revising its Risk Management Framework 
to incorporate a portfolio level anti-procyclicality analysis that 
features price changes observed during and immediately after the Lehman 
Brothers (``LB'') default. In order to achieve an anti-procyclicality 
of Spread Response requirements, ICC proposes consideration of explicit 
price scenarios derived from the greatest price decrease and increase 
during and immediately after the LB default. According to ICC, these 
scenarios capture the default of a major participant in the credit 
market and the market response to the event. The introduced scenarios 
are defined in price space to maintain the stress severity during 
periods of low credit spread levels and high price when the Spread 
Response requirements computed under the current framework are expected 
to be lower.
    Further, as explained by ICC, the price scenarios derived from the 
greatest price decrease and increase during and immediately after the 
LB default are explicitly incorporated into the GF sizing to ensure an 
anti-procyclical GF size behavior. ICC states that this enhancement 
also addresses a regulatory requirement as described in Article 30 of 
the Regulatory Technical Standards,\5\ European Market Infrastructure 
Regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No. 153/2013 of 19 
December 2012 Supplementing Regulation (EU) No. 648/2012 of the 
European Parliament and of the Council with regard to Regulatory 
Technical Standards on Requirements for Central Counterparties (the 
``Regulatory Technical Standards'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Furthermore, ICC proposes enhancements to its GF allocation 
methodology. Currently, ICC states that the GF allocations reflect a 
risk ``silo'' approach, which separates each GF risk component. Under 
the current methodology, the allocation of GF reflects the Clearing 
Participants' (``CPs'') own riskiness in proportion to each GF risk 
component size and the increase or decrease of the ``silo'' size. 
Therefore, GF allocations can significantly fluctuate in response to 
position changes in the portfolios of the CPs that drive the GF size. 
ICC proposes modifying its methodology so that the GF allocations 
reflect the CPs' total uncollateralized losses across all GF risk 
components. According to ICC, under the proposed approach, the GF 
allocations are independent of the distribution of the uncollateralized 
losses across various GF risk components or ``silos'' and the 
fluctuation of each CP's uncollateralized losses within various GF risk 
components or ``silos.'' Additionally, ICC added clarifying language 
regarding how the GF computations are performed with explicit currency 
dependent expressions.
    ICC also proposes certain non-substantive changes to the Risk 
Management Framework to address CFTC recommendations. Specifically, ICC 
proposes amending the Risk Management Framework to reflect ICC's 
current approach towards portfolio diversification, by unifying 
diversification and hedge thresholds and explicitly setting both to be 
equal to the lowest estimated sector Kendall Tau correlation 
coefficient. ICC also proposes clarifying language regarding how ICC 
meets its liquidity requirements.
    Additionally, ICC proposes non-substantive changes throughout the 
framework to correct obsolete references. Specifically, ICC is removing 
language stating that the Chief Risk Officer is a dual employee of both 
ICC and its sister company, The Clearing Corporation. ICC is also 
removing language stating that The Clearing Corporation is the provider 
of risk management services to ICC. Furthermore, ICC is removing 
references to the ``U.K. Financial Services Authority'' and replacing 
with references to the ``U.K. Prudential Regulatory Authority.'' 
Finally, ICC is adding ``The European Securities and Markets 
Authority'' to the sample list of competent authorities for capital 
adequacy regulation listed in the framework.
    ICC also proposes non-substantive changes throughout the Risk 
Management Framework to ensure consistency. ICC is updating the mission 
statement contained within the document to be consistent with ICC's 
Board-approved mission statement. Also, ICC is modifying the frequency 
by which the Risk Department monitors various risk metrics from a 
quarterly basis to a monthly basis to reflect actual business 
practices.

III. Discussion and Commission Findings

    Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act \6\ directs the Commission to 
approve a proposed rule change of a self-regulatory organization if the 
Commission finds that such proposed rule change is consistent with the 
requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder 
applicable to such self-regulatory organization. Section 17A(b)(3)(F) 
of the Act \7\ requires, among other things, that the rules of a 
clearing agency are designed to promote the prompt and accurate 
clearance and

[[Page 20060]]

settlement of securities transactions and, to the extent applicable, 
derivative agreements, contracts, and transactions and, in general, to 
protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with Section 17A of the Act \8\ and the rules thereunder applicable to 
ICC, including the requirements of Rule 17Ad-22.\9\ The Commission 
believes that the part of the proposal separating the RR stress levels 
for the JTD and RRSR computations would use a more robust and 
quantitative driven approach for establishing the RR stress scenarios, 
resulting in more dynamic and appropriate estimations of the RR stress 
levels for RRSR purposes. The Commission finds that the incorporation 
of the Lehman Brothers default price scenarios into the computation of 
the Spread Response requirements enhances the anti-procyclical feature 
of ICC's risk methodology. The Commission further finds that the 
proposed rule change that modifies the current GF allocation 
methodology to reflect the CPs' total uncollateralized losses across 
all GF components regardless of the fluctuation of the CPs' 
uncollateralized losses with respect to each GF component would result 
in more stable attributions of GF contributions to individual CP/client 
portfolios. Finally, the Commission finds that the proposed non-
substantive and clarification changes are each designed to more 
accurately reflect ICC's current practices.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
    \9\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Therefore, the Commission believes that the proposal is designed to 
promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities 
transactions and derivative agreements, contracts and transactions 
cleared by ICC and, in general, to protect investors and the public 
interest, consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act \10\ and 
Rules 17Ad-22(b)(1), (2) and (3).\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
    \11\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(b)(1), (2) and (3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Conclusion

    On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the 
proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Act and in 
particular with the requirements of Section 17A of the Act \12\ and the 
rules and regulations thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the 
Act,\13\ that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-ICC-2014-24) be, 
and hereby is, approved.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \14\ In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission 
considered the proposal's impact on efficiency, competition and 
capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-08455 Filed 4-13-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P



                                                    20058                          Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 71 / Tuesday, April 14, 2015 / Notices

                                                    Factory, Inc. (The) is no longer an                     based in Ohio. The company is quoted                  private. World Racing Group, Inc. is a
                                                    operating business. Dream Factory, Inc.                 on OTC Link under the ticker symbol                   Delaware corporation based in North
                                                    (The) was a Nevada corporation based                    NIVM.                                                 Carolina. The company is quoted on
                                                    in Texas. The company is quoted on                         15. It appears to the Securities and               OTC Link under the ticker symbol
                                                    OTC Link under the ticker symbol                        Exchange Commission that Naylor Pipe                  WRGP.
                                                    DRMF.                                                   Co. has been taken private. Naylor Pipe                  The Commission is of the opinion that
                                                      6. It appears to the Securities and                   Co. is an Illinois corporation based in               the public interest and the protection of
                                                    Exchange Commission that Dynatem,                       Illinois. The company is quoted on OTC                investors require a suspension of trading
                                                    Inc. has been taken private. Dynatem,                   Link under the ticker symbol NAYP.                    in the securities of the above-listed
                                                    Inc. is a California corporation based in                  16. It appears to the Securities and               companies.
                                                    California. The company is quoted on                    Exchange Commission that Omega                           Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to
                                                    OTC Link under the ticker symbol                        Ventures, Inc. is no longer an operating              Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange
                                                    DYTM.                                                   business. Omega Ventures, Inc. was a                  Act of 1934, that trading in the
                                                      7. It appears to the Securities and                   Nevada corporation based in Florida.                  securities of the above-listed companies
                                                    Exchange Commission that Employers                      The company is quoted on OTC Link                     is suspended for the period from 9:30
                                                    General Insurance Group is no longer an                 under the ticker symbol OMVN.                         a.m. EDT on April 10, 2015, through
                                                    operating business. Employers General                      17. It appears to the Securities and               11:59 p.m. EDT on April 23, 2015.
                                                    Insurance Group is a Delaware                           Exchange Commission that On Stage
                                                    corporation based in Texas. The                         Entertainment, Inc. has been taken                       By the Commission.
                                                    company is quoted on OTC Link under                     private. On Stage Entertainment, Inc. is              Jill M. Peterson,
                                                    the ticker symbol EGIG.                                 a Nevada corporation based in Nevada.                 Assistant Secretary.
                                                      8. It appears to the Securities and                   The company is quoted on OTC Link                     [FR Doc. 2015–08621 Filed 4–10–15; 11:15 am]
                                                    Exchange Commission that K-tel                          under the ticker symbol ONST.                         BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
                                                    International, Inc. has been taken                         18. It appears to the Securities and
                                                    private. K-tel International, Inc. is a                 Exchange Commission that Pachinko
                                                    Minnesota corporation based in Canada.                  World, Inc. is no longer an operating                 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
                                                    The company is quoted on OTC Link                       business. Pachinko World, Inc. was a                  COMMISSION
                                                    under the ticker symbol KTLI.                           Nevada corporation based in California.
                                                      9. It appears to the Securities and                   The company is quoted on OTC Link                     [Release No. 34–74685; File No. SR–ICC–
                                                    Exchange Commission that Maintenance                    under the ticker symbol PCHW.                         2014–24]
                                                    Depot, Inc. is no longer an operating                      19. It appears to the Securities and
                                                    business. Maintenance Depot, Inc. was a                 Exchange Commission that Polyair Inter                Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE
                                                    Florida corporation based in Florida.                   Pack Inc. has been taken private. Polyair             Clear Credit LLC; Order Granting
                                                    The company is quoted on OTC Link                       Inter Pack Inc. is a Canadian entity                  Approval of Proposed Rule Change To
                                                    under the ticker symbol MDPO.                           based in Canada. The company is                       Revise the ICC Risk Management
                                                      10. It appears to the Securities and                  quoted on OTC Link under the ticker                   Framework
                                                    Exchange Commission that Manifold                       symbol PPKZ.
                                                    Capital Corp. is no longer an operating                    20. It appears to the Securities and               April 8, 2015.
                                                    business. Manifold Capital Corp. was a                  Exchange Commission that Setech, Inc.                 I. Introduction
                                                    Delaware corporation based in New                       has been taken private. Setech, Inc. is a
                                                    York. The company is quoted on OTC                      Delaware corporation based in                            On December 22, 2014, ICE Clear
                                                    Link under the ticker symbol MANF.                      Tennessee. The company is quoted on                   Credit LLC (‘‘ICC’’) filed with the
                                                      11. It appears to the Securities and                  OTC Link under the ticker symbol                      Securities and Exchange Commission
                                                    Exchange Commission that McM Corp.                      SETC.                                                 (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
                                                    has been taken private. McM Corp. is a                     21. It appears to the Securities and               change SR–ICC–2014–24 pursuant to
                                                    North Carolina corporation based in                     Exchange Commission that Seven J                      Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
                                                    North Carolina. The company is quoted                   Stock Farm, Inc. has been taken private.              Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule
                                                    on OTC Link under the ticker symbol                     Seven J Stock Farm, Inc. is a Texas                   19b–4 thereunder.2 The proposed rule
                                                    MMOR.                                                   corporation based in Texas. The                       change was published for comment in
                                                      12. It appears to the Securities and                  company is quoted on OTC Link under                   the Federal Register on January 9,
                                                    Exchange Commission that Mt. Carmel                     the ticker symbol SVJJ.                               2015.3 On February 20, 2015, the
                                                    Public Utility Co. has been taken                          22. It appears to the Securities and               Commission extended the time period
                                                    private. Mt. Carmel Public Utility Co. is               Exchange Commission that TransCor                     in which to either approve, disapprove,
                                                    an Illinois corporation based in Illinois.              Waste Services, Inc. has been taken                   or institute proceedings to determine
                                                    The company is quoted on OTC Link                       private. TransCor Waste Services, Inc. is             whether to disapprove the proposed
                                                    under the ticker symbol MCPB.                           a Florida corporation based in Florida.               rule change to April 9, 2015.4 The
                                                      13. It appears to the Securities and                  The company is quoted on OTC Link                     Commission received no comment
                                                    Exchange Commission that Muskoka                        under the ticker symbol TRCW.                         letters regarding the proposed change.
                                                    Flooring Corp. is no longer an operating                   23. It appears to the Securities and               For the reasons discussed below, the
                                                    business. Muskoka Flooring Corp. was a                  Exchange Commission that Valley                       Commission is granting approval of the
                                                    Delaware corporation based in                           Systems, Inc. (VSI Liquidation Corp.) is              proposed rule change.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                    Delaware. The company is quoted on                      no longer an operating business. Valley
                                                    OTC Link under the ticker symbol                        Systems, Inc. (VSI Liquidation Corp.)                   1 15  U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
                                                    MSKA.                                                   was a Delaware corporation based in                     2 17  CFR 240.19b–4.
                                                      14. It appears to the Securities and                  Georgia. The company is quoted on OTC                    3 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34–73980

                                                    Exchange Commission that National                                                                             (Jan. 5, 2015), 80 FR 1466 (Jan. 9, 2015) (SR–ICC–
                                                                                                            Link under the ticker symbol VSLC.                    2014–24).
                                                    Investment Managers, Inc. has been                         24. It appears to the Securities and                  4 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34–74341
                                                    taken private. National Investment                      Exchange Commission that World                        (Feb. 20, 2015), 80 FR 10551 (Feb. 26, 2015) (SR–
                                                    Managers, Inc. is a Florida corporation                 Racing Group, Inc. has been taken                     ICC–2014–24).



                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:42 Apr 13, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00104   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\14APN1.SGM   14APN1


                                                                                   Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 71 / Tuesday, April 14, 2015 / Notices                                            20059

                                                    II. Description of the Proposed Rule                    procyclicality analysis that features                 with explicit currency dependent
                                                    Change                                                  price changes observed during and                     expressions.
                                                       ICC proposes revising the ICC Risk                   immediately after the Lehman Brothers                    ICC also proposes certain non-
                                                                                                            (‘‘LB’’) default. In order to achieve an              substantive changes to the Risk
                                                    Management Framework to incorporate
                                                                                                            anti-procyclicality of Spread Response                Management Framework to address
                                                    risk model enhancements related to
                                                                                                            requirements, ICC proposes                            CFTC recommendations. Specifically,
                                                    Recovery Rate Sensitivity Requirements
                                                                                                            consideration of explicit price scenarios             ICC proposes amending the Risk
                                                    (‘‘RRSR’’), anti-procyclicality, and ICC’s
                                                                                                            derived from the greatest price decrease              Management Framework to reflect ICC’s
                                                    Guaranty Fund (‘‘GF’’) allocation
                                                                                                            and increase during and immediately                   current approach towards portfolio
                                                    methodology. ICC also proposes
                                                                                                            after the LB default. According to ICC,               diversification, by unifying
                                                    revisions which are intended to remove
                                                                                                            these scenarios capture the default of a              diversification and hedge thresholds
                                                    obsolete references and ensure
                                                                                                            major participant in the credit market                and explicitly setting both to be equal to
                                                    consistency.
                                                                                                            and the market response to the event.                 the lowest estimated sector Kendall Tau
                                                       ICC proposes revising its Risk
                                                                                                            The introduced scenarios are defined in               correlation coefficient. ICC also
                                                    Management Framework to incorporate
                                                                                                            price space to maintain the stress                    proposes clarifying language regarding
                                                    risk model parameter estimation
                                                                                                            severity during periods of low credit                 how ICC meets its liquidity
                                                    enhancements related to the RRSR
                                                                                                            spread levels and high price when the                 requirements.
                                                    computations. ICC states that under its                                                                          Additionally, ICC proposes non-
                                                    current ICC Risk Management                             Spread Response requirements
                                                                                                            computed under the current framework                  substantive changes throughout the
                                                    Framework, recovery rate stress                                                                               framework to correct obsolete
                                                    scenarios are explicitly incorporated in                are expected to be lower.
                                                                                                                                                                  references. Specifically, ICC is removing
                                                    the RRSR computations and for Jump-                        Further, as explained by ICC, the
                                                                                                                                                                  language stating that the Chief Risk
                                                    to-Default (‘‘JTD’’) considerations. The                price scenarios derived from the greatest
                                                                                                                                                                  Officer is a dual employee of both ICC
                                                    quantity RRSR is designed to capture                    price decrease and increase during and
                                                                                                                                                                  and its sister company, The Clearing
                                                    fluctuations due to potential changes of                immediately after the LB default are
                                                                                                                                                                  Corporation. ICC is also removing
                                                    the market expected recovery rates. In                  explicitly incorporated into the GF
                                                                                                                                                                  language stating that The Clearing
                                                    calculating the RRSR, all instruments                   sizing to ensure an anti-procyclical GF
                                                                                                                                                                  Corporation is the provider of risk
                                                    belonging to a Risk Factor (‘‘RF’’) or                  size behavior. ICC states that this
                                                                                                                                                                  management services to ICC.
                                                    Risk Sub-Factor (‘‘RSF’’) are subjected to              enhancement also addresses a
                                                                                                                                                                  Furthermore, ICC is removing references
                                                    Recovery Rate (‘‘RR’’) stress scenarios to              regulatory requirement as described in
                                                                                                                                                                  to the ‘‘U.K. Financial Services
                                                    obtain resulting Profit/Loss (‘‘P/L’’)                  Article 30 of the Regulatory Technical
                                                                                                                                                                  Authority’’ and replacing with
                                                    responses, and the worst scenario                       Standards,5 European Market
                                                                                                                                                                  references to the ‘‘U.K. Prudential
                                                    response is chosen for the estimation of                Infrastructure Regulations.
                                                                                                                                                                  Regulatory Authority.’’ Finally, ICC is
                                                    the RF/RSF RRSR. The JTD analysis is                       Furthermore, ICC proposes                          adding ‘‘The European Securities and
                                                    designed to capture the unexpected                      enhancements to its GF allocation                     Markets Authority’’ to the sample list of
                                                    potential losses associated with credit                 methodology. Currently, ICC states that               competent authorities for capital
                                                    events for assumed single-name-specific                 the GF allocations reflect a risk ‘‘silo’’            adequacy regulation listed in the
                                                    set of RR stress values. The JTD                        approach, which separates each GF risk                framework.
                                                    responses are determined by using                       component. Under the current                             ICC also proposes non-substantive
                                                    minimum and maximum RR levels.                          methodology, the allocation of GF                     changes throughout the Risk
                                                    Currently, the RRSR and JTD                             reflects the Clearing Participants’                   Management Framework to ensure
                                                    computations use the same RR stress                     (‘‘CPs’’) own riskiness in proportion to              consistency. ICC is updating the mission
                                                    levels.                                                 each GF risk component size and the                   statement contained within the
                                                       ICC proposes separating the RR stress                increase or decrease of the ‘‘silo’’ size.            document to be consistent with ICC’s
                                                    levels for these two computations in                    Therefore, GF allocations can                         Board-approved mission statement.
                                                    order to introduce more dynamic and                     significantly fluctuate in response to                Also, ICC is modifying the frequency by
                                                    appropriate estimations of the RR stress                position changes in the portfolios of the             which the Risk Department monitors
                                                    levels for RRSR purposes. According to                  CPs that drive the GF size. ICC proposes              various risk metrics from a quarterly
                                                    ICC, the RR levels for RRSR purposes                    modifying its methodology so that the                 basis to a monthly basis to reflect actual
                                                    will reflect a 5-day 99% Expected                       GF allocations reflect the CPs’ total                 business practices.
                                                    Shortfall (‘‘ES’’) equivalent risk measure              uncollateralized losses across all GF risk
                                                    associated with RR fluctuations. The                    components. According to ICC, under                   III. Discussion and Commission
                                                    proposal will also, as stated by ICC,                   the proposed approach, the GF                         Findings
                                                    eliminate index RRSR, as index RRs are                  allocations are independent of the                       Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act 6 directs
                                                    not subject to market uncertainty, but                  distribution of the uncollateralized                  the Commission to approve a proposed
                                                    rather driven by market conventions.                    losses across various GF risk                         rule change of a self-regulatory
                                                    ICC states that the dynamic feature of                  components or ‘‘silos’’ and the                       organization if the Commission finds
                                                    the RR stress level estimations is                      fluctuation of each CP’s uncollateralized             that such proposed rule change is
                                                    achieved by analyzing historical time                   losses within various GF risk                         consistent with the requirements of the
                                                    series of RRs in order to calibrate a                   components or ‘‘silos.’’ Additionally,                Act and the rules and regulations
                                                    statistical model with a time varying
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                            ICC added clarifying language regarding               thereunder applicable to such self-
                                                    volatility. Under this approach, ICC                    how the GF computations are performed                 regulatory organization. Section
                                                    calculates, the RRSR will capture the                                                                         17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act 7 requires, among
                                                    exposure to RR fluctuations over a 5-day                  5 Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No. 153/     other things, that the rules of a clearing
                                                    risk horizon described by 99% ES                        2013 of 19 December 2012 Supplementing                agency are designed to promote the
                                                    equivalent risk measure.                                Regulation (EU) No. 648/2012 of the European
                                                                                                            Parliament and of the Council with regard to
                                                                                                                                                                  prompt and accurate clearance and
                                                       Additionally, ICC proposes revising                  Regulatory Technical Standards on Requirements
                                                    its Risk Management Framework to                        for Central Counterparties (the ‘‘Regulatory            6 15   U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
                                                    incorporate a portfolio level anti-                     Technical Standards’’).                                 7 15   U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).



                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:42 Apr 13, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00105   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\14APN1.SGM    14APN1


                                                    20060                          Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 71 / Tuesday, April 14, 2015 / Notices

                                                    settlement of securities transactions                   proposed rule change (File No. SR–ICC–                DATE(S):  Submit comments directly to
                                                    and, to the extent applicable, derivative               2014–24) be, and hereby is, approved.14               the Office of Management and Budget
                                                    agreements, contracts, and transactions                   For the Commission, by the Division of              (OMB) up to May 14, 2015.
                                                    and, in general, to protect investors and               Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated            ADDRESSES: Direct comments to the
                                                    the public interest.                                    authority.15                                          Department of State Desk Officer in the
                                                       The Commission finds that the                        Brent J. Fields,                                      Office of Information and Regulatory
                                                    proposed rule change is consistent with                 Secretary.                                            Affairs at the Office of Management and
                                                    Section 17A of the Act 8 and the rules                  [FR Doc. 2015–08455 Filed 4–13–15; 8:45 am]           Budget (OMB). You may submit
                                                    thereunder applicable to ICC, including                 BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
                                                                                                                                                                  comments by the following methods:
                                                    the requirements of Rule 17Ad–22.9 The                                                                           • Email: oira_submission@
                                                    Commission believes that the part of the                                                                      omb.eop.gov. You must include the DS
                                                    proposal separating the RR stress levels                                                                      form number, information collection
                                                    for the JTD and RRSR computations                       SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION                         title, and the OMB control number in
                                                    would use a more robust and                             Surrender of License of Small                         the subject line of your message.
                                                    quantitative driven approach for                        Business Investment Company                              • Fax: 202–395–5806. Attention: Desk
                                                    establishing the RR stress scenarios,                                                                         Officer for Department of State.
                                                    resulting in more dynamic and                             Pursuant to the authority granted to                FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                    appropriate estimations of the RR stress                the United States Small Business                      Direct requests for additional
                                                    levels for RRSR purposes. The                           Administration under the Small                        information regarding the collection
                                                    Commission finds that the incorporation                 Business Investment Act of 1958, as                   listed in this notice, including requests
                                                    of the Lehman Brothers default price                    amended, under Section 309 of the Act                 for copies of the proposed collection
                                                    scenarios into the computation of the                   and Section 107.1900 of the Small                     instrument and supporting documents,
                                                    Spread Response requirements                            Business Administration Rules and                     to Derek Rivers, Bureau of Consular
                                                    enhances the anti-procyclical feature of                Regulations (13 CFR 107.1900) to                      Affairs, Overseas Citizens Services (CA/
                                                    ICC’s risk methodology. The                             function as a small business investment               OCS/PMO), U.S. Department of State,
                                                    Commission further finds that the                       company under the Small Business                      SA–17, 10th Floor, Washington, DC
                                                    proposed rule change that modifies the                  Investment Company License No. 03/                    20036 or at RiversDA@state.gov.
                                                    current GF allocation methodology to                    03–0252 issued to MidCap Financial                    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                    reflect the CPs’ total uncollateralized                 SBIC, L.P., said license is hereby                       • Title of Information Collection:
                                                    losses across all GF components                         declared null and void.                               Evacuee Manifest and Promissory Note.
                                                    regardless of the fluctuation of the CPs’               United States Small Business                             • OMB Control Number: 1405–0211.
                                                    uncollateralized losses with respect to                 Administration.                                          • Type of Request: Extension of a
                                                    each GF component would result in                         Dated: April 8, 2015.                               currently approved collection.
                                                    more stable attributions of GF                          Javier E. Saade,                                         • Originating Office: Bureau of
                                                    contributions to individual CP/client                                                                         Consular Affairs, Overseas Citizens
                                                                                                            Associate Administrator for Investment and
                                                    portfolios. Finally, the Commission                     Innovation.                                           Services (CA/OCS).
                                                    finds that the proposed non-substantive
                                                                                                            [FR Doc. 2015–08504 Filed 4–13–15; 8:45 am]              • Form Number: DS–5528.
                                                    and clarification changes are each
                                                                                                            BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
                                                                                                                                                                     • Respondents: U.S. citizens, U.S.
                                                    designed to more accurately reflect                                                                           non-citizen nationals, lawful permanent
                                                    ICC’s current practices.                                                                                      residents, and third country nationals
                                                       Therefore, the Commission believes                                                                         applying for emergency loan assistance
                                                    that the proposal is designed to promote                DEPARTMENT OF STATE                                   during an evacuation.
                                                    the prompt and accurate clearance and                   [Public Notice: 9097]                                    • Estimated Number of Respondents:
                                                    settlement of securities transactions and                                                                     525.
                                                    derivative agreements, contracts and                    30-Day Notice of Proposed Information                    • Estimated Number of Responses:
                                                    transactions cleared by ICC and, in                     Collection: Evacuee Manifest and                      525.
                                                    general, to protect investors and the                   Promissory Note                                          • Average Hours per Response: 20
                                                    public interest, consistent with Section                                                                      minutes.
                                                    17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act 10 and Rules                    ACTION:Notice of request for public                      • Total Estimated Burden: 175 hours.
                                                    17Ad–22(b)(1), (2) and (3).11                           comment and submission to OMB of                         • Frequency: On Occasion.
                                                                                                            proposed collection of information.                      • Obligation to Respond: Required to
                                                    IV. Conclusion                                                                                                Obtain Benefits.
                                                                                                            SUMMARY:   The Department of State has                   We are soliciting public comments to
                                                      On the basis of the foregoing, the
                                                                                                            submitted the information collection                  permit the Department to:
                                                    Commission finds that the proposal is
                                                                                                            described below to the Office of                         • Evaluate whether the proposed
                                                    consistent with the requirements of the
                                                                                                            Management and Budget (OMB) for                       information collection is necessary for
                                                    Act and in particular with the
                                                                                                            approval. In accordance with the                      the proper functions of the Department.
                                                    requirements of Section 17A of the
                                                                                                            Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 we                       • Evaluate the accuracy of our
                                                    Act 12 and the rules and regulations
                                                                                                            are requesting comments on this                       estimate of the time and cost burden for
                                                    thereunder.
                                                                                                            collection from all interested                        this proposed collection, including the
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                      It is therefore ordered, pursuant to                  individuals and organizations. The
                                                    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,13 that the                                                                       validity of the methodology and
                                                                                                            purpose of this Notice is to allow 30                 assumptions used.
                                                                                                            days for public comment.                                 • Enhance the quality, utility, and
                                                      8 15 U.S.C. 78q–1.
                                                      9 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22.
                                                                                                                                                                  clarity of the information to be
                                                                                                               14 In approving the proposed rule change, the
                                                      10 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).                                                                                collected.
                                                                                                            Commission considered the proposal’s impact on
                                                      11 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(b)(1), (2) and (3).
                                                                                                            efficiency, competition and capital formation. 15        • Minimize the reporting burden on
                                                      12 15 U.S.C. 78q–1.                                   U.S.C. 78c(f).                                        those who are to respond, including the
                                                      13 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).                                  15 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).                         use of automated collection techniques


                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:42 Apr 13, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00106   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\14APN1.SGM   14APN1



Document Created: 2015-12-18 11:10:10
Document Modified: 2015-12-18 11:10:10
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
FR Citation80 FR 20058 

2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR