80 FR 23484 - Special Local Regulation; Suncoast Super Boat Grand Prix; Gulf of Mexico, Sarasota, FL

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 81 (April 28, 2015)

Page Range		23484-23487
FR Document		2015-09860

The Coast Guard is proposing to amend a special local regulation on the waters of the Gulf of Mexico in the vicinity of Sarasota, Florida during the Suncoast Super Boat Grand Prix. The event is scheduled to take place annually on the first Friday, Saturday, and Sunday of July from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. The proposed amendment to the special local regulation is necessary to protect the safety of race participants, participant vessels, spectators, and the general public on the navigable waters of the United States during the event. The special local regulation would restrict vessel traffic in the Gulf of Mexico near Sarasota, Florida. It would establish the following three areas: A race area, where all persons and vessels, except those persons and vessels participating in the high speed boat races, are prohibited from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within; a spectator area, where all vessels must be anchored or operate at No Wake Speed; and an enforcement area where designated representatives may control vessel traffic as determined by prevailing conditions.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 81 (Tuesday, April 28, 2015)

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 81 (Tuesday, April 28, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 23484-23487]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09860]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket Number USCG-2015-0216]
RIN 1625-AA08


Special Local Regulation; Suncoast Super Boat Grand Prix; Gulf of 
Mexico, Sarasota, FL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is proposing to amend a special local 
regulation on the waters of the Gulf of Mexico in the vicinity of 
Sarasota, Florida during the Suncoast Super Boat Grand Prix. The event 
is scheduled to take place annually on the first Friday, Saturday, and 
Sunday of July from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. The proposed amendment to the 
special local regulation is necessary to protect the safety of race 
participants, participant vessels, spectators, and the general public 
on the navigable waters of the United States during the event. The 
special local regulation would restrict vessel traffic in the Gulf of 
Mexico near Sarasota, Florida. It would establish the following three 
areas: A race area, where all persons and vessels, except those persons 
and vessels participating in the high speed boat races, are prohibited 
from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within; a 
spectator area, where all vessels must be anchored or operate at No 
Wake Speed; and an enforcement area where designated representatives 
may control vessel traffic as determined by prevailing conditions.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast 
Guard on or before May 11, 2015.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number using 
any one of the following methods:
    (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Fax: (202) 493-2251.
    (3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. 
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries 
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 
federal holidays. The telephone number is (202) 366-9329.
    See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion 
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions 
on submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of 
these three methods.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email Lieutenant Junior Grade Brett S. Sillman, Sector St. 
Petersburg Prevention Department, Coast Guard; telephone (813) 228-
2191, email [email protected]. If you have questions on 
viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl Collins, 
Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Acronyms

DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register

A. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting 
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted 
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any 
personal information you have provided.

1. Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this 
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which 
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or 
recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online at 
http://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but 
please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online, it 
will be considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully 
transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, 
it will be considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when 
it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you 
include your name and a mailing address, an email address, or a 
telephone number in the body of your document so that we can contact 
you if we have questions regarding your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov, 
type the docket number USCG-2015-0216 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click 
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with 
this rulemaking.
    If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them 
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for 
copying and electronic filing. If you submit

[[Page 23485]]

comments by mail and would like to know that they reached the Facility, 
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will 
consider all comments and material received during the comment period 
and may change the rule based on your comments.

2. Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble 
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, 
type the docket number USCG-2015-0216 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click 
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with 
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in 
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation 
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, 
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal 
holidays.

3. Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any 
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or 
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, 
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice 
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the 
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

4. Public Meeting

    We do not plan to hold a public meeting, but you may submit a 
request for one, using one of the methods specified under ADDRESSES. 
Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be beneficial. If 
we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a 
time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.

B. Regulatory History and Information

    The Coast Guard is proposing to amend the special local regulation 
on the waters of the Gulf of Mexico in the vicinity of Sarasota, 
Florida during the Suncoast Super Boat Grand Prix. The event is 
scheduled to take place the first Friday, Saturday, and Sunday in July 
from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. This proposed rule is necessary to protect the 
safety of race participants, participant vessels, spectators, and the 
general public on the navigable waters of the United States during the 
event.

C. Basis and Purpose

    The legal basis for the proposed rule is the Coast Guard's 
authority to establish special local regulations: 33 U.S.C. 1233 and 33 
CFR 1.05-1.
    The purpose of the proposed rule is to provide for the safety of 
life on navigable waters of the United States during the Suncoast Super 
Boat Grand Prix.

D. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    This proposed rule is necessary to amend a special local regulation 
that will encompass certain waters of the Gulf of Mexico in Sarasota, 
Florida. The proposed special local regulation would be enforced 
annually during the first Friday, Saturday, and Sunday of July from 10 
a.m. to 5 p.m. The proposed special local regulations will establish 
the following three areas:
     A race area, where all persons and vessels, except those 
persons and vessels participating in the high speed boat races, are 
prohibited from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or 
remaining within;
     A spectator area, where all vessels must be anchored or 
operate at No Wake Speed; and
     An enforcement area where designated representatives may 
control vessel traffic as determined by the prevailing conditions.

The enforcement area encompasses both the race area and the spectator 
area.

    Persons and vessels may request authorization to enter, transit 
through, anchor in, or remain within the race area or enforcement area 
by contacting the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg by telephone at 
(727) 824-7506, or a designated representative via VHF radio on channel 
16. If authorization to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain 
within the race area or enforcement area is granted by the Captain of 
the Port St. Petersburg or a designated representative, all persons and 
vessels receiving such authorization must comply with the instructions 
of the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg or a designated 
representative.

E. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes 
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our 
analyses based on a number of these statutes or executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under 
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, 
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and 
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential 
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or 
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and 
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders.
    The economic impact of this proposed rule is not significant for 
the following reasons: The special local regulations would be enforced 
for only seven hours a day for three days; although persons and vessels 
are prohibited from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or 
remaining within the race area or enforcement area without 
authorization from the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg or a 
designated representative, they may operate in the surrounding area 
during the enforcement period; persons and vessels may still enter, 
transit through, anchor in, or remain within the race area and 
enforcement area if authorized by the Captain of the Port St. 
Petersburg or a designated representative; and the Coast Guard would 
provide advance notification of the special local regulations to the 
local maritime community by Local Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice 
to Mariners and/or on-scene designate representatives.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have 
considered the impact of this proposed rule on small entities. The 
Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    The impact on small entities of this proposed rule is not 
significant for the following reasons: The special local regulations 
would be enforced for only seven hours a day for three days; although 
persons and vessels are prohibited from entering, transiting through, 
anchoring in, or remaining within the race area or enforcement area 
without authorization from the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg or a 
designated representative, they may operate in the surrounding area 
during the enforcement period; persons and vessels may still enter, 
transit through, anchor in, or remain within the race area and 
enforcement area if authorized by the Captain of the Port St. 
Petersburg or a designated representative; and the Coast Guard would 
provide advance notification of the special local regulations to the 
local maritime community by Local Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice 
to Mariners and/or on-scene designate representatives.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have 
a

[[Page 23486]]

significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see 
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what 
degree this rule would economically affect it.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect 
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you 
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any 
policy or action of the Coast Guard.

4. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule will not call for a new collection of 
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and 
determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism.

 6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not 
result in such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule 
elsewhere in this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

    This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or 
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, 
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected 
Property Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize 
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045, 
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety 
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not 
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might 
disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under 
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

    This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under 
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

13. Technical Standards

    This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we 
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland 
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction 
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have 
made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category 
of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
effect on the human environment. This rule is categorically excluded 
from further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the 
Commandant Instruction. A preliminary environmental analysis checklist 
supporting this determination is available in the docket where 
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may 
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this 
proposed rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100

    Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes 
to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:

PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS

0
1. The authority citation for part 100 is revised to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1233, 33 CFR 1.05-1, Department of 
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1(II)(70).

0
2. Revise Sec.  100.720 to read as follows:


Sec.  100.720  Special Local Regulations; Suncoast Super Boat Grand 
Prix, Gulf of Mexico; Sarasota, FL.

    (a) Regulated areas. The following regulated areas are established 
as special local regulations. All coordinates are North American Datum 
1983.
    (1) Race area. All waters of the Gulf of Mexico encompassed by a 
line connecting the following points: 27[deg]18.19' N., 82[deg]34.29' 
W., thence to 27[deg]17.42' N., 82[deg]35.00' W., thence to 
27[deg]18.61' N., 82[deg]36.59' W., thence to 27[deg]19.58' N., 
82[deg]35.54' W., thence back to the original point 27[deg]18.19' N., 
82[deg]34.29' W.
    (2) Enforcement area. All waters of the Gulf of Mexico encompassed 
by a line connecting the following points: 27[deg]17.87' N., 
82[deg]33.93' W., thence to position 27[deg]16.61' N., 82[deg]34.69' 
W., thence to position 27[deg]18.53' N., 82[deg]37.52' W., thence to 
position 27[deg]20.04' N., 82[deg]35.76' W., thence back to the 
original position 27[deg]17.87' N., 82[deg]33.93' W.
    (3) Spectator area. All waters of within the enforcement area that 
are more than 500 yards from the race area.
    (b) Definition. The term ``designated representative'' means Coast 
Guard Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty 
officers, and other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and 
Federal, state, and local officers designated by or assisting the

[[Page 23487]]

Captain of the Port St. Petersburg in the enforcement of the regulated 
areas.
    (c) Regulations. (1) All persons and vessels are prohibited from 
entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the 
race area unless an authorized race participant.
    (2) Designated representatives may control vessel traffic 
throughout the enforcement area as determined by the prevailing 
conditions.
    (3) All vessels in the spectator area are to be anchored or operate 
at a No Wake Speed. On-scene designated representatives will direct 
spectator vessels to the spectator area.
    (4) All vessel traffic not involved with the event shall enter and 
exit Sarasota Bay via Big Sarasota Pass and stay clear of the 
enforcement area.
    (5) New Pass will be closed to all inbound and outbound vessel 
traffic at the COLREGS Demarcation Line. Vessels are allowed to utilize 
New Pass to access all areas inland of the Demarcation Line via 
Sarasota Bay. New Pass may be opened at the discretion of the Captain 
of the Port.
    (6) Persons and vessels may request authorization to enter, transit 
through, anchor in, or remain within the regulated areas by contacting 
the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg by telephone at (727) 824-7506, 
or a designated representative via VHF radio on channel 16. If 
authorization is granted by the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg or a 
designated representative, all persons and vessels receiving such 
authorization must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the 
Port St. Petersburg or a designated representative.
    (d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced annually the 
first Friday, Saturday, and Sunday of July from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. EDT 
daily.

    Dated: April 2, 2015.
G.D. Case,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port St. Petersburg.
[FR Doc. 2015-09860 Filed 4-27-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

23486 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 81 / Tuesday, April 28, 2015 / Proposed Rules

significant economic impact on it, 8. Taking of Private Property the human environment. This rule is
please submit a comment (see This proposed rule would not cause a categorically excluded from further
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it taking of private property or otherwise review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure
qualifies and how and to what degree have taking implications under 2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. A
this rule would economically affect it. Executive Order 12630, Governmental preliminary environmental analysis
Actions and Interference with checklist supporting this determination
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Constitutionally Protected Property is available in the docket where
Under section 213(a) of the Small indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek
Rights.
Business Regulatory Enforcement any comments or information that may
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 9. Civil Justice Reform lead to the discovery of a significant
we want to assist small entities in This proposed rule meets applicable environmental impact from this
understanding this proposed rule. If the standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of proposed rule.
rule would affect your small business, Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
organization, or governmental List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Reform, to minimize litigation,
jurisdiction and you have questions eliminate ambiguity, and reduce Marine safety, Navigation (water),
concerning its provisions or options for burden. Reporting and recordkeeping
compliance, please contact the person requirements, Waterways.
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 10. Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks For the reasons discussed in the
CONTACT section above. The Coast Guard preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
will not retaliate against small entities We have analyzed this proposed rule amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
that question or complain about this under Executive Order 13045,
proposed rule or any policy or action of Protection of Children from PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
the Coast Guard. Environmental Health Risks and Safety NAVIGABLE WATERS
4. Collection of Information Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an ■ 1. The authority citation for part 100
This proposed rule will not call for a environmental risk to health or risk to is revised to read as follows:
new collection of information under the safety that might disproportionately Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233, 33 CFR 1.05–
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 affect children. 1, Department of Homeland Security
U.S.C. 3501–3520). Delegation No. 0170.1(II)(70).
11. Indian Tribal Governments
5. Federalism ■ 2. Revise § 100.720 to read as follows:
This proposed rule does not have
A rule has implications for federalism tribal implications under Executive § 100.720 Special Local Regulations;
under Executive Order 13132, Order 13175, Consultation and Suncoast Super Boat Grand Prix, Gulf of
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct Coordination with Indian Tribal Mexico; Sarasota, FL.
effect on the States, on the relationship Governments, because it would not have (a) Regulated areas. The following
between the national government and a substantial direct effect on one or regulated areas are established as
the States, or on the distribution of more Indian tribes, on the relationship special local regulations. All
power and responsibilities among the between the Federal Government and coordinates are North American Datum
various levels of government. We have Indian tribes, or on the distribution of 1983.
analyzed this proposed rule under that power and responsibilities between the
Order and determined that this rule (1) Race area. All waters of the Gulf
Federal Government and Indian tribes. of Mexico encompassed by a line
does not have implications for
federalism. 12. Energy Effects connecting the following points:
27°18.19′ N., 82°34.29′ W., thence to
This proposed rule is not a
6. Protest Activities 27°17.42′ N., 82°35.00′ W., thence to
‘‘significant energy action’’ under
The Coast Guard respects the First 27°18.61′ N., 82°36.59′ W., thence to
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Amendment rights of protesters. 27°19.58′ N., 82°35.54′ W., thence back
Concerning Regulations That
Protesters are asked to contact the to the original point 27°18.19′ N.,
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
person listed in the FOR FURTHER 82°34.29′ W.
Distribution, or Use.
INFORMATION CONTACT section to (2) Enforcement area. All waters of
coordinate protest activities so that your 13. Technical Standards the Gulf of Mexico encompassed by a
message can be received without This proposed rule does not use line connecting the following points:
jeopardizing the safety or security of technical standards. Therefore, we did 27°17.87′ N., 82°33.93′ W., thence to
people, places or vessels. not consider the use of voluntary position 27°16.61′ N., 82°34.69′ W.,
consensus standards. thence to position 27°18.53′ N.,
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 82°37.52′ W., thence to position
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 14. Environment 27°20.04′ N., 82°35.76′ W., thence back
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires We have analyzed this proposed rule to the original position 27°17.87′ N.,
federal agencies to assess the effects of under Department of Homeland 82°33.93′ W.
their discretionary regulatory actions. In Security Management Directive 023–01 (3) Spectator area. All waters of
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

particular, the Act addresses actions and Commandant Instruction within the enforcement area that are
that may result in the expenditure by a M16475.lD, which guide the Coast more than 500 yards from the race area.
State, local, or tribal government, in the Guard in complying with the National (b) Definition. The term ‘‘designated
aggregate, or by the private sector of Environmental Policy Act of 1969 representative’’ means Coast Guard
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and Patrol Commanders, including Coast
more in any one year. Though this have made a preliminary determination Guard coxswains, petty officers, and
proposed rule would not result in such that this action is one of a category of other officers operating Coast Guard
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of actions that do not individually or vessels, and Federal, state, and local
this rule elsewhere in this preamble. cumulatively have a significant effect on officers designated by or assisting the

VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:51 Apr 27, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\28APP1.SGM 28APP1

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 81 / Tuesday, April 28, 2015 / Proposed Rules 23487

Captain of the Port St. Petersburg in the ACTION: Proposed rule. be publicly available in either location
enforcement of the regulated areas. (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy
(c) Regulations. (1) All persons and SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection materials, please schedule an
vessels are prohibited from entering, Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve appointment during normal business
transiting through, anchoring in, or revisions to the Yolo-Solano Air Quality hours with the contact listed in the FOR
remaining within the race area unless an Management District (YSAQMD) FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
authorized race participant. portion of the California State
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
(2) Designated representatives may Implementation Plan (SIP). These
Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, (415)
control vessel traffic throughout the revisions concern volatile organic
972–3024, Lazarus.Arnold@epa.gov.
enforcement area as determined by the compound (VOC) emissions from
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
prevailing conditions. organic solvents cleaning operations.
We are proposing to rescind and proposal addresses the following local
(3) All vessels in the spectator area are rules: YSAQMD Rule 1.1 ‘‘General
to be anchored or operate at a No Wake approve local rules to regulate these
emission sources under the Clean Air Provisions and Definitions,’’ Rule 2.13
Speed. On-scene designated ‘‘Organic Solvents,’’ Rule 2.15 ‘‘Disposal
Act (CAA or the Act).
representatives will direct spectator and Evaporation of Solvents,’’ Rule 2.24
vessels to the spectator area. DATES: Any comments on this proposal
‘‘Solvent Cleaning Operations
(4) All vessel traffic not involved with must arrive by May 28, 2015.
(Degreasing),’’ and Rule 2.31 ‘‘Solvent
the event shall enter and exit Sarasota ADDRESSES: Submit comments, Cleaning and Degreasing.’’ In the Rules
Bay via Big Sarasota Pass and stay clear identified by docket number EPA–R09– and Regulations section of this Federal
of the enforcement area. OAR–2014–0873 by one of the following Register, we are approving Rule 1.1 and
(5) New Pass will be closed to all methods: Rule 2.31 and rescinding Rule 2.13,
inbound and outbound vessel traffic at 1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: Rule 2.15 and Rule 2.24, all local rules,
the COLREGS Demarcation Line. www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line in a direct final action without prior
Vessels are allowed to utilize New Pass instructions. proposal because we believe these SIP
to access all areas inland of the 2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel revisions are not controversial. If we
Demarcation Line via Sarasota Bay. New receive adverse comments, however, we
(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection
Pass may be opened at the discretion of will publish a timely withdrawal of the
Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
the Captain of the Port. direct final rule and address the
San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
(6) Persons and vessels may request Instructions: All comments will be comments in subsequent action based
authorization to enter, transit through, included in the public docket without on this proposed rule. Please note that
anchor in, or remain within the change and may be made available if we receive adverse comment on an
regulated areas by contacting the online at www.regulations.gov, amendment, paragraph, or section of
Captain of the Port St. Petersburg by including any personal information this rule and if that provision may be
telephone at (727) 824–7506, or a provided, unless the comment includes severed from the remainder of the rule,
designated representative via VHF radio Confidential Business Information (CBI) we may adopt as final those provisions
on channel 16. If authorization is or other information whose disclosure is of the rule that are not the subject of an
granted by the Captain of the Port St. restricted by statute. Information that adverse comment.
Petersburg or a designated We do not plan to open a second
you consider CBI or otherwise protected
representative, all persons and vessels comment period, so anyone interested
should be clearly identified as such and
receiving such authorization must in commenting should do so at this
should not be submitted through
comply with the instructions of the time. If we do not receive adverse
www.regulations.gov or email.
Captain of the Port St. Petersburg or a comments, no further activity is
www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous
designated representative. planned. For further information, please
access’’ system, and EPA will not know
(d) Enforcement period. This section see the direct final action.
your identity or contact information
will be enforced annually the first unless you provide it in the body of Dated: March 30, 2015.
Friday, Saturday, and Sunday of July your comment. If you send email Jared Blumenfeld,
from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. EDT daily. directly to EPA, your email address will Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Dated: April 2, 2015. be automatically captured and included [FR Doc. 2015–09735 Filed 4–27–15; 8:45 am]
G.D. Case, as part of the public comment. If EPA BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the cannot read your comment due to
Port St. Petersburg. technical difficulties and cannot contact
[FR Doc. 2015–09860 Filed 4–27–15; 8:45 am] you for clarification, EPA may not be ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P able to consider your comment. AGENCY
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of 40 CFR Part 52
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION encryption, and be free of any defects or [EPA–R06–OAR–2012–0098; FRL–9926–92–
AGENCY viruses. Region–6]
Docket: Generally, documents in the
docket for this action are available Approval and Promulgation of Air
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

40 CFR Part 52
electronically at www.regulations.gov Quality Implementation Plans; Texas;
[EPA–R09–OAR–2014–0873; FRL–9926–18– and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Attainment Demonstration for the
Region 9] Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, Dallas/Fort Worth 1997 8-Hour Ozone
California 94105–3901. While all Nonattainment Area; Determination of
Revisions to the California State Attainment of the 1997 Ozone Standard
Implementation Plan, Yolo-Solano Air documents in the docket are listed at
Quality Management District www.regulations.gov, some information AGENCY: Environmental Protection
may be publicly available only at the Agency (EPA).
AGENCY: Environmental Protection hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted
ACTION: Proposed rule.
Agency (EPA). material, large maps), and some may not

VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:51 Apr 27, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\28APP1.SGM 28APP1

Document Created: 2015-12-16 08:35:16
Document Modified: 2015-12-16 08:35:16

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Dates		Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before May 11, 2015.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, call or email Lieutenant Junior Grade Brett S. Sillman, Sector St. Petersburg Prevention Department, Coast Guard; telephone (813) 228- 2191, email [email protected] If you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
FR Citation		80 FR 23484
RIN Number		1625-AA08
CFR Associated		Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Waterways

80 FR 23484 - Special Local Regulation; Suncoast Super Boat Grand Prix; Gulf of Mexico, Sarasota, FL

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 81 (April 28, 2015)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard