80 FR 24233 - Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 83 (April 30, 2015)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 83 (April 30, 2015)
| Page Range | 24233-24236 | |
| FR Document | 2015-10134 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 83 (Thursday, April 30, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 24233-24236] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-10134] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (``the Department'') has received requests to conduct administrative reviews of various antidumping and countervailing duty orders and findings with March anniversary dates. In accordance with the Department's regulations, we are initiating those administrative reviews. DATES: Effective date April 30, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-4735. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The Department has received timely requests, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b), for administrative reviews of various antidumping and countervailing duty orders and findings with March anniversary dates. All deadlines for the submission of various types of information, certifications, or comments or actions by the Department discussed below refer to the number of calendar days from the applicable starting time. Notice of No Sales If a producer or exporter named in this notice of initiation had no exports, sales, or entries during the period of review (``POR''), it must notify the Department within 30 days of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. All submissions must be filed electronically at http://access.trade.gov in accordance with 19 CFR 351.303.\1\ Such submissions are subject to verification in accordance with section 782(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''). Further, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(1)(i), a copy must be served on every party on the Department's service list. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondent Selection In the event the Department limits the number of respondents for individual examination for administrative reviews, the Department intends to select respondents based on U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') data for U.S. imports during the POR. We intend to release the CBP data under Administrative Protective Order (``APO'') to all parties having an APO within seven days of publication of this initiation notice and to make our decision regarding respondent selection within 21 days of publication of this Federal Register notice. The Department invites comments regarding the CBP data and respondent selection within five days of placement of the CBP data on the record of the applicable review. Rebuttal comments will be due five days after submission of initial comments. In the event the Department decides it is necessary to limit individual examination of respondents and conduct respondent selection under section 777A(c)(2) of the Act: In general, the Department has found that determinations concerning whether particular companies should be ``collapsed'' (i.e., treated as a single entity for purposes of calculating antidumping duty rates) require a substantial amount of detailed information and analysis, which often require follow-up questions and analysis. Accordingly, the Department will not conduct collapsing analyses at the respondent selection phase of this review and will not collapse companies at the respondent selection phase unless there has been a determination to collapse certain companies in a previous segment of this antidumping proceeding (i.e., investigation, administrative review, new shipper review or changed circumstances review). For any company subject to this review, if the Department determined, or continued to treat, that company as collapsed with others, the Department will assume that such companies continue to operate in the same manner and will collapse them for respondent selection purposes. Otherwise, the Department will not collapse companies for purposes of respondent selection. Parties are requested to (a) identify which companies subject to review previously were collapsed, and (b) provide a citation to the proceeding in which they were collapsed. Further, if companies are requested to complete the Quantity and Value (``Q&V'') Questionnaire for purposes of respondent selection, in general each company must report volume and value data separately for itself. Parties should not include data for any other party, even if they believe they should be treated as a single entity with that other party. If a company was collapsed with another company or companies in the most recently completed segment of this proceeding where the Department considered collapsing that entity, complete Q&V data for that collapsed entity must be submitted. Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a party that has requested a review may withdraw that request within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. The regulation provides that the Department may extend this time if it is reasonable to do so. In order to provide parties additional certainty with respect to when the Department will exercise its discretion to extend this 90-day deadline, interested parties are advised that the Department does not intend to extend the 90-day deadline unless the requestor demonstrates that an extraordinary circumstance has prevented it from submitting a timely withdrawal request. Determinations by the Department to extend the 90-day [[Page 24234]] deadline will be made on a case-by-case basis. Separate Rates In proceedings involving non-market economy (``NME'') countries, the Department begins with a rebuttable presumption that all companies within the country are subject to government control and, thus, should be assigned a single antidumping duty deposit rate. It is the Department's policy to assign all exporters of merchandise subject to an administrative review in an NME country this single rate unless an exporter can demonstrate that it is sufficiently independent so as to be entitled to a separate rate. To establish whether a firm is sufficiently independent from government control of its export activities to be entitled to a separate rate, the Department analyzes each entity exporting the subject merchandise under a test arising from the Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Sparklers from the People's Republic of China, 56 FR 20588 (May 6, 1991), as amplified by Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Silicon Carbide from the People's Republic of China, 59 FR 22585 (May 2, 1994). In accordance with the separate rates criteria, the Department assigns separate rates to companies in NME cases only if respondents can demonstrate the absence of both de jure and de facto government control over export activities. All firms listed below that wish to qualify for separate rate status in the administrative reviews involving NME countries must complete, as appropriate, either a separate rate application or certification, as described below. For these administrative reviews, in order to demonstrate separate rate eligibility, the Department requires entities for whom a review was requested, that were assigned a separate rate in the most recent segment of this proceeding in which they participated, to certify that they continue to meet the criteria for obtaining a separate rate. The Separate Rate Certification form will be available on the Department's Web site at http://enforcement.trade.gov/nme/nme-sep-rate.html on the date of publication of this Federal Register notice. In responding to the certification, please follow the ``Instructions for Filing the Certification'' in the Separate Rate Certification. Separate Rate Certifications are due to the Department no later than 30 calendar days after publication of this Federal Register notice. The deadline and requirement for submitting a Certification applies equally to NME-owned firms, wholly foreign-owned firms, and foreign sellers who purchase and export subject merchandise to the United States. Entities that currently do not have a separate rate from a completed segment of the proceeding \2\ should timely file a Separate Rate Application to demonstrate eligibility for a separate rate in this proceeding. In addition, companies that received a separate rate in a completed segment of the proceeding that have subsequently made changes, including, but not limited to, changes to corporate structure, acquisitions of new companies or facilities, or changes to their official company name, \3\ should timely file a Separate Rate Application to demonstrate eligibility for a separate rate in this proceeding. The Separate Rate Status Application will be available on the Department's Web site at http://enforcement.trade.gov/nme/nme-sep-rate.html on the date of publication of this Federal Register notice. In responding to the Separate Rate Status Application, refer to the instructions contained in the application. Separate Rate Status Applications are due to the Department no later than 30 calendar days of publication of this Federal Register notice. The deadline and requirement for submitting a Separate Rate Status Application applies equally to NME-owned firms, wholly foreign-owned firms, and foreign sellers that purchase and export subject merchandise to the United States. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ Such entities include entities that have not participated in the proceeding, entities that were preliminarily granted a separate rate in any currently incomplete segment of the proceeding (e.g., an ongoing administrative review, new shipper review, etc.) and entities that lost their separate rate in the most recently completed segment of the proceeding in which they participated. \3\ Only changes to the official company name, rather than trade names, need to be addressed via a Separate Rate Application. Information regarding new trade names may be submitted via a Separate Rate Certification. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For exporters and producers who submit a separate-rate status application or certification and subsequently are selected as mandatory respondents, these exporters and producers will no longer be eligible for separate rate status unless they respond to all parts of the questionnaire as mandatory respondents. Initiation of Reviews In accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we are initiating administrative reviews of the following antidumping and countervailing duty orders and findings. We intend to issue the final results of these reviews not later than March 31, 2016. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Period to be reviewed ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Antidumping Duty Proceedings France: Brass Sheet and Strip A-427-602.............. 3/1/14-2/28/15 Griset SA KME France Germany: Brass Sheet and Strip A-428-602............. 3/1/14-2/28/15 Aurubis Stolberg GmbH & Co. KG Carl Schreiber GmbH KME Germany AG & Co. KG Messingwerk Plettenberg Herfeld GmbH & Co. KG MKM Mansfelder Kupfer & Messing GmbH Schlenk Metallfolien GmbH & Co. KG (also known as ``Schlenk Metal Foils'') Schwermetall Halbzeugwerk GmbH & Co. KG Sundwiger Messingwerke GmbH & Co. KG ThyssenKrupp VDM GmbH Wieland-Werke AG Italy: Brass Sheet and Strip A-475-601............... 3/1/14-2/28/15 KME Italy SpA Spain: Stainless Steel Bar A-469-805................. 3/1/14-2/28/15 Gerdau Aceros Especiales Europa, S.L. [[Page 24235]] Thailand: Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and 3/1/14-2/28/15 Tubes, A-549-502.................................... Saha Thai Steel Pipe (Public) Company, Ltd. The People's Republic of China: Glycine A-570-836.... 3/1/14-2/28/15 Baoding Mantong Fine Chemistry Co., Ltd. Kumar Industries Nutracare International Ravi Industries Rudraa International Countervailing Duty Proceedings Republic of Korea: Large Residential Washers. \4\ C-580-869............................................ 1/1/14-12/31/14 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Suspension Agreements None ------------------------------------------------------------------------ \4\ The company listed above was misspelled in the initiation notice that published on April 3, 2015 (80 FR 18202). The correct spelling of the company is listed in this notice. Duty Absorption Reviews During any administrative review covering all or part of a period falling between the first and second or third and fourth anniversary of the publication of an antidumping duty order under 19 CFR 351.211 or a determination under 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4) to continue an order or suspended investigation (after sunset review), the Secretary, if requested by a domestic interested party within 30 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the review, will determine, consistent with FAG Italia v. United States, 291 F.3d 806 (Fed Cir. 2002), as appropriate, whether antidumping duties have been absorbed by an exporter or producer subject to the review if the subject merchandise is sold in the United States through an importer that is affiliated with such exporter or producer. The request must include the name(s) of the exporter or producer for which the inquiry is requested. Gap Period Liquidation For the first administrative review of any order, there will be no assessment of antidumping or countervailing duties on entries of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the relevant provisional-measures ``gap'' period, of the order, if such a gap period is applicable to the POR. Administrative Protective Orders and Letters of Appearance Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under administrative protective orders in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. On January 22, 2008, the Department published Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Documents Submission Procedures; APO Procedures, 73 FR 3634 (January 22, 2008). Those procedures apply to administrative reviews included in this notice of initiation. Parties wishing to participate in any of these administrative reviews should ensure that they meet the requirements of these procedures (e.g., the filing of separate letters of appearance as discussed at 19 CFR 351.103(d)). Revised Factual Information Requirements On April 10, 2013, the Department published Definition of Factual Information and Time Limits for Submission of Factual Information: Final Rule, 78 FR 21246 (April 10, 2013), which modified two regulations related to antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings: the definition of factual information (19 CFR 351.102(b)(21)), and the time limits for the submission of factual information (19 CFR 351.301). The final rule identifies five categories of factual information in 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21), which are summarized as follows: (i) Evidence submitted in response to questionnaires; (ii) evidence submitted in support of allegations; (iii) publicly available information to value factors under 19 CFR 351.408(c) or to measure the adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR 351.511(a)(2); (iv) evidence placed on the record by the Department; and (v) evidence other than factual information described in (i)-(iv). The final rule requires any party, when submitting factual information, to specify under which subsection of 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) the information is being submitted and, if the information is submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct factual information already on the record, to provide an explanation identifying the information already on the record that the factual information seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct. The final rule also modified 19 CFR 351.301 so that, rather than providing general time limits, there are specific time limits based on the type of factual information being submitted. These modifications are effective for all segments initiated on or after May 10, 2013. Please review the final rule, available at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/2013/1304frn/2013-08227.txt, prior to submitting factual information in this segment. Any party submitting factual information in an antidumping duty or countervailing duty proceeding must certify to the accuracy and completeness of that information.\5\ Parties are hereby reminded that revised certification requirements are in effect for company/government officials as well as their representatives. All segments of any antidumping duty or countervailing duty proceedings initiated on or after August 16, 2013, should use the formats for the revised certifications provided at the end of the Final Rule.\6\ The Department intends to reject factual submissions in any proceeding segments if the submitting party does not comply with applicable revised certification requirements. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See section 782(b) of the Act. \6\ See Certification of Factual Information To Import Administration During Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July 17, 2013) (``Final Rule''); see also the frequently asked questions regarding the Final Rule, available at http://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Revised Extension of Time Limits Regulation On September 20, 2013, the Department modified its regulation concerning the extension of time limits for submissions in antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings: Final Rule, 78 FR 57790 (September 20, 2013). [[Page 24236]] The modification clarifies that parties may request an extension of time limits before a time limit established under Part 351 expires, or as otherwise specified by the Secretary. In general, an extension request will be considered untimely if it is filed after the time limit established under Part 351 expires. For submissions which are due from multiple parties simultaneously, an extension request will be considered untimely if it is filed after 10:00 a.m. on the due date. Examples include, but are not limited to: (1) Case and rebuttal briefs, filed pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309; (2) factual information to value factors under 19 CFR 351.408(c), or to measure the adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR 351.511(a)(2), filed pursuant to 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3) and rebuttal, clarification and correction filed pursuant to 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3)(iv); (3) comments concerning the selection of a surrogate country and surrogate values and rebuttal; (4) comments concerning U.S. Customs and Border Protection data; and (5) quantity and value questionnaires. Under certain circumstances, the Department may elect to specify a different time limit by which extension requests will be considered untimely for submissions which are due from multiple parties simultaneously. In such a case, the Department will inform parties in the letter or memorandum setting forth the deadline (including a specified time) by which extension requests must be filed to be considered timely. This modification also requires that an extension request must be made in a separate, stand-alone submission, and clarifies the circumstances under which the Department will grant untimely-filed requests for the extension of time limits. These modifications are effective for all segments initiated on or after October 21, 2013. Please review the final rule, available at http://www.thefederalregister.org/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/html/2013-22853.htm, prior to submitting factual information in these segments. These initiations and this notice are in accordance with section 751(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)) and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i). Dated: April 24, 2015. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2015-10134 Filed 4-29-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 83 / Thursday, April 30, 2015 / Notices 24233
orders would likely lead to the Background entity for purposes of calculating
continuation or recurrence of dumping The Department has received timely antidumping duty rates) require a
and a countervailable subsidy, as well requests, in accordance with 19 CFR substantial amount of detailed
as material injury to an industry in the 351.213(b), for administrative reviews of information and analysis, which often
United States, pursuant to section various antidumping and countervailing require follow-up questions and
751(d)(2) of the Act, the Department duty orders and findings with March analysis. Accordingly, the Department
hereby orders the continuation of the anniversary dates. will not conduct collapsing analyses at
AD and CVD orders on commodity All deadlines for the submission of the respondent selection phase of this
matchbooks from India. U.S. Customs various types of information, review and will not collapse companies
and Border Protection will continue to certifications, or comments or actions by at the respondent selection phase unless
collect AD and CVD cash deposits at the the Department discussed below refer to there has been a determination to
rates in effect at the time of entry for all the number of calendar days from the collapse certain companies in a
imports of subject merchandise. applicable starting time. previous segment of this antidumping
The effective date of the continuation proceeding (i.e., investigation,
of these orders will be the date of Notice of No Sales administrative review, new shipper
publication in the Federal Register of If a producer or exporter named in review or changed circumstances
this notice of continuation. Pursuant to this notice of initiation had no exports, review). For any company subject to this
section 751(c)(2) of the Act, the sales, or entries during the period of review, if the Department determined,
Department intends to initiate the next review (‘‘POR’’), it must notify the or continued to treat, that company as
sunset review of these orders not later Department within 30 days of collapsed with others, the Department
than 30 days prior to the fifth publication of this notice in the Federal will assume that such companies
anniversary of the effective date of Register. All submissions must be filed continue to operate in the same manner
continuation. electronically at http://access.trade.gov and will collapse them for respondent
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.303.1 selection purposes. Otherwise, the
These sunset reviews and this notice
Such submissions are subject to Department will not collapse companies
are in accordance with sections 751(c)
verification in accordance with section for purposes of respondent selection.
and 751(d)(2) of the Act, and published
782(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as Parties are requested to (a) identify
pursuant to 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR
amended (‘‘the Act’’). Further, in which companies subject to review
351.218(f)(4).
accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(1)(i), previously were collapsed, and (b)
Dated: April 24, 2015. provide a citation to the proceeding in
a copy must be served on every party on
Paul Piquado, which they were collapsed. Further, if
the Department’s service list.
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and companies are requested to complete
Compliance. Respondent Selection the Quantity and Value (‘‘Q&V’’)
[FR Doc. 2015–10133 Filed 4–29–15; 8:45 am] In the event the Department limits the Questionnaire for purposes of
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P number of respondents for individual respondent selection, in general each
examination for administrative reviews, company must report volume and value
the Department intends to select data separately for itself. Parties should
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE respondents based on U.S. Customs and not include data for any other party,
Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) data for U.S. even if they believe they should be
International Trade Administration treated as a single entity with that other
imports during the POR. We intend to
release the CBP data under party. If a company was collapsed with
Initiation of Antidumping and another company or companies in the
Countervailing Duty Administrative Administrative Protective Order
(‘‘APO’’) to all parties having an APO most recently completed segment of this
Reviews proceeding where the Department
within seven days of publication of this
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, initiation notice and to make our considered collapsing that entity,
International Trade Administration, decision regarding respondent selection complete Q&V data for that collapsed
Department of Commerce. within 21 days of publication of this entity must be submitted.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce Federal Register notice. The Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for
(‘‘the Department’’) has received Department invites comments regarding Administrative Review
requests to conduct administrative the CBP data and respondent selection Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a
reviews of various antidumping and within five days of placement of the party that has requested a review may
countervailing duty orders and findings CBP data on the record of the applicable withdraw that request within 90 days of
with March anniversary dates. In review. Rebuttal comments will be due the date of publication of the notice of
accordance with the Department’s five days after submission of initial initiation of the requested review. The
regulations, we are initiating those comments. regulation provides that the Department
administrative reviews. In the event the Department decides may extend this time if it is reasonable
it is necessary to limit individual to do so. In order to provide parties
DATES: Effective date April 30, 2015. examination of respondents and additional certainty with respect to
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: conduct respondent selection under when the Department will exercise its
Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD section 777A(c)(2) of the Act: discretion to extend this 90-day
Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, In general, the Department has found
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
deadline, interested parties are advised
Enforcement and Compliance, that determinations concerning whether that the Department does not intend to
International Trade Administration, particular companies should be extend the 90-day deadline unless the
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th ‘‘collapsed’’ (i.e., treated as a single requestor demonstrates that an
Street and Constitution Avenue NW., extraordinary circumstance has
Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 1 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
prevented it from submitting a timely
482–4735. Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures;
Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR withdrawal request. Determinations by
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 39263 (July 6, 2011). the Department to extend the 90-day
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:01 Apr 29, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30APN1.SGM 30APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_24316/page/1.svg)
![24236 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 83 / Thursday, April 30, 2015 / Notices
The modification clarifies that parties DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Dated: April 24, 2015.
may request an extension of time limits Gregory W. Campbell,
before a time limit established under International Trade Administration Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office,
Part 351 expires, or as otherwise Enforcement and Compliance.
Harvard University, et al.; Notice of
specified by the Secretary. In general, an [FR Doc. 2015–10132 Filed 4–29–15; 8:45 am]
Consolidated Decision on Applications
extension request will be considered BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
for Duty-Free Entry of Electron
untimely if it is filed after the time limit
Microscope
established under Part 351 expires. For
submissions which are due from This is a decision consolidated DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
multiple parties simultaneously, an pursuant to Section 6(c) of the International Trade Administration
extension request will be considered Educational, Scientific, and Cultural
untimely if it is filed after 10:00 a.m. on Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. New Mexico Institute of Mining and
the due date. Examples include, but are L. 89–651, as amended by Pub. L. 106– Technology, et al.; Notice of Decision
not limited to: (1) Case and rebuttal 36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). on Application for Duty-Free Entry of
briefs, filed pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309; Related records can be viewed between Scientific Instruments
(2) factual information to value factors 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. in Room 3720,
under 19 CFR 351.408(c), or to measure U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and This is a decision pursuant to Section
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific, and
the adequacy of remuneration under 19
DC. Cultural Materials Importation Act of
CFR 351.511(a)(2), filed pursuant to 19
Docket Number: 14–031. Applicant: 1966 (Pub. L. 89–651, as amended by
CFR 351.301(c)(3) and rebuttal, Pub. L. 106–36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR
clarification and correction filed Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
02138. Instrument: Electron Microscope. part 301). Related records can be viewed
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3)(iv); (3) between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. in
comments concerning the selection of a Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., Japan.
Intended Use: See notice at 80 FR 2914– Room 3720, U.S. Department of
surrogate country and surrogate values Commerce, 14th and Constitution Ave.
and rebuttal; (4) comments concerning 15, January 21, 2015.
Docket Number: 14–033. Applicant: NW., Washington, DC.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection Docket Number: 14–032. Applicant:
data; and (5) quantity and value University of South Carolina School of
New Mexico Institute of Mining and
questionnaires. Under certain Medicine, Columbia, SC 29208.
Technology, Socorro, NM 87801.
Instrument: Electron Microscope.
circumstances, the Department may Instrument: Delay Line Trolley (DLT).
elect to specify a different time limit by Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., Japan.
Manufacturer: University of Cambridge/
Intended Use: See notice at 80 FR 2914–
which extension requests will be Cavendish Lab, United Kingdom.
15, January 21, 2015.
considered untimely for submissions Intended Use: See notice at 80 FR 2914–
Docket Number: 14–036. Applicant: 15, January 21, 2015. Comments: None
which are due from multiple parties
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI received. Decision: Approved. We know
simultaneously. In such a case, the
48109–2200. Instrument: Electron of no instruments of equivalent
Department will inform parties in the
Microscope. Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., scientific value to the foreign
letter or memorandum setting forth the Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 80 FR
deadline (including a specified time) by instruments described below, for such
2914–15, January 21, 2015. purposes as this is intended to be used,
which extension requests must be filed Docket Number: 14–037. Applicant:
to be considered timely. This that was being manufactured in the
University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ United States at the time of order.
modification also requires that an 85721. Instrument: Electron Microscope.
extension request must be made in a Reasons: The instrument will be used
Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech within the Magdalena Ridge
separate, stand-alone submission, and Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 80 Observatory Interferometer (MROI) to
clarifies the circumstances under which FR 2914–15, January 21, 2015. equalize path lengths traveled by the
the Department will grant untimely- Docket Number: 14–038. Applicant: light from a target object, via the
filed requests for the extension of time University of North Dakota, Grand telescopes, to the point where
limits. These modifications are effective Forks, ND 58202–8153. Instrument: interference takes place, by acting as a
for all segments initiated on or after Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI continuously movable retro-reflector.
October 21, 2013. Please review the Company, Czech Republic. Each trolley moves continuously within
final rule, available at http:// Intended Use: See notice at 80 FR an evacuated pipe in order to introduce
www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/ 2914–15, January 21, 2015. the optical path delay appropriate for
html/2013-22853.htm, prior to Comments: None received. Decision: the target, time of observation, and
submitting factual information in these Approved. No instrument of equivalent inter-telescope separations in use. For
segments. scientific value to the foreign most of the sky to be accessible, a delay
These initiations and this notice are instrument, for such purposes as this range approximately equal to the longest
in accordance with section 751(a) of the instrument is intended to be used, is inter-telescope separation must be
Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)) and 19 CFR being manufactured in the United States available, requiring an unprecedented
351.221(c)(1)(i). at the time the instrument was ordered. monolithic delay line length of almost
Reasons: Each foreign instrument is an 200m. The instrument is essentially a
Dated: April 24, 2015.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
electron microscope and is intended for cat’s-eye assembly that is flexure-
Christian Marsh, research or scientific educational uses mounted and voice coil actuated on a
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping requiring an electron microscope. We motorized wheeled carriage, which runs
and Countervailing Duty Operations. know of no electron microscope, or any directly on the inner surface of the delay
[FR Doc. 2015–10134 Filed 4–29–15; 8:45 am] other instrument suited to these line pipe, not on pre-installed rails. Its
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P purposes, which was being position is precisely measured by a laser
manufactured in the United States at the metrology system and computer
time of order of each instrument. controlled so as to introduce the
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:01 Apr 29, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30APN1.SGM 30APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_24316/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-21 10:15:17
Document Modified: 2018-02-21 10:15:17
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective date April 30, 2015. | |
| Contact | Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-4735. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 24233 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR