80 FR 27565 - Safety Zone; Portland Dragon Boat Races, Portland, OR

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 93 (May 14, 2015)

Page Range		27565-27567
FR Document		2015-11018

The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone in Portland, OR. This safety zone is necessary to help ensure the safety of the maritime public during the annual marine event and will do so by prohibiting unauthorized persons and vessels from entering the regulated area unless authorized by the Sector Columbia River Captain of the Port or his designated representatives.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 93 (Thursday, May 14, 2015)

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 93 (Thursday, May 14, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 27565-27567]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-11018]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2014-0492]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Portland Dragon Boat Races, Portland, OR

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone in Portland, OR. 
This safety zone is necessary to help ensure the safety of the maritime 
public during the annual marine event and will do so by prohibiting 
unauthorized persons and vessels from entering the regulated area 
unless authorized by the Sector Columbia River Captain of the Port or 
his designated representatives.

DATES: This rule is effective June 15, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of Docket 
Number [USCG-2014-0492]. To view documents mentioned in this preamble 
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, 
type the docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' 
Click on ``Open Docket Folder'' on the line associated with this 
rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room 
W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West 
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-2014-0492 
using any one of the following methods:
    (1) Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
    (3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. 
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries 
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 
federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329. See the 
``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of the 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions on 
submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of these 
three methods.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email Kenneth Lawrenson, Waterways Management Division, Marine 
Safety Unit Portland, Coast Guard; telephone 503-240-9319, email 
msupdxwwm@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or submitting 
material to the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, Docket 
Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Acronyms

DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

A. Regulatory History and Information

    An interim rule was used for the establishment of the 2014 Portland 
Dragon Boat Races and was published as USCG-2014-0492 in the Federal 
Register on October 21, 2014 with a comment period that ended on 
November 20, 2014. Three comments were received and no requests for a 
public meeting were received by the Coast Guard. All three comments 
received were generally supportive of the event. The comments received 
and the answers to comments are covered in the ``Discussion of 
Comments, Changes and the Final Rule'' section, below.

B. Basis and Purpose

    Coast Guard Captains of the Port are granted authority to establish 
safety zones in 33 CFR 1.05-1(f) for safety and environmental purposes 
as described in 33 CFR part 165.
    Regattas create the potential for complex navigation situations 
because of the large number of vessels that congregate near the event. 
In addition, the dragon boats involved in this regatta are not power 
driven vessels and consequently are limited in their ability to 
maneuver. This safety zone is necessary in order to ensure the safety 
of the maritime public in the proximity of marine event sites and 
reduce the risk of collision with the non-power driven vessels involved 
in the race.

C. Discussion of Comments, Changes and the Final Rule

    As discussed above, in the ``Regulatory History and Information'' 
section, there were three comments received on the Temporary Interim 
Rule, published as USCG-2014-0492, for the 2014 Portland Dragon Boat 
Races. The first commenter was a cat and stated that they agreed that 
the safety of people is important. The Coast Guard agrees. The second 
commenter asked, ``What is a dragon boat and where can I find one?'' A 
dragon boat is a vessel propelled with paddles by a large crew and used 
for racing. Sources for these vessels are beyond the scope of this 
rulemaking. The third commenter recommended that the safety zone cover 
a larger area, based on the event's recent rise in popularity in the 
Portland area. The Coast Guard agrees that the Portland Dragon Boat 
Festival has seen recent increases in attendance and participation; 
however the racing route has remained unchanged. Given that race 
managers limit the number of participants on the water at any specific 
time, the Coast Guard has determined that the current safety zone is 
adequate to protect the interests of safe navigation.

D. Discussion of the Final Rule

    The Final Rule finalizes the interim Safety Zone in the Thirteenth 
Coast Guard District without changes.

[[Page 27566]]

    This regulated area is located along the western side of the 
Willamette River extending from Tom McCall Waterfront Park between the 
Hawthorne and Marquam Bridges, Portland, OR. The center span of the 
Hawthorne and Marquam bridges will be left open to allow commercial 
traffic through during the event. This event will take place from 8:00 
a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on the first or second Saturday and Sunday of 
September. The zone is short in duration and will allow waterway users 
to enter or transit through the zone when deemed safe by the Captain of 
the Port or his designated representative.

E. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on these statutes and executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) 
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as 
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and 
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential 
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or 
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and 
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. The Coast Guard has made 
this determination based on the fact that the regulated area created by 
this rule will not significantly affect the maritime public because 
vessels may still coordinate their transit with the Coast Guard in the 
vicinity of the safety zone. Additionally, the Safety Zone which will 
be enforced is minimal in duration.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000.
    The Coast Guard did not receive comments from the Small Business 
Administration on this rule.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will 
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities.
    This rule may affect the following entities, some of which may be 
small entities: The owners and operators of vessels intending to 
operate in the area covered by the safety zone.
    The rule will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: (i) The 
regulated area is limited in size; (ii) the official on-scene patrol 
may authorize access to the regulated area; (iii) the regulated area 
will affect a limited geographical location for a limited time; (iv) 
the Coast Guard will make notifications via maritime advisories so 
mariners can adjust their plans accordingly; and (v) vessel traffic 
will be able to pass the safety zone with permission from the COTP 
representative.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have 
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see 
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what 
degree this rule would economically affect it.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT above.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

4. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined 
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.

6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in 
this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise 
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental 
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property 
Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, 
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule 
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an 
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may 
disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, 
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more 
Indian

[[Page 27567]]

tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian 
tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between 
the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

    This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive 
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect 
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

13. Technical Standards

    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not 
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a 
preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of 
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
effect on the human environment. This rule involves the creation of one 
safety zone around a marine event to protect the maritime public. This 
rule is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 
34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. A preliminary 
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination and a 
Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where 
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may 
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this 
rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the interim rule amending 33 
CFR part 165 which was published at 79 FR 62829 on October 21, 2014 is 
adopted as a final rule without change.

    Dated: April 17, 2015.
D.J. Travers,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Sector Columbia River.
[FR Doc. 2015-11018 Filed 5-13-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

27566 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 93 / Thursday, May 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

This regulated area is located along entities: The owners and operators of Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
the western side of the Willamette River vessels intending to operate in the area effect on the States, on the relationship
extending from Tom McCall Waterfront covered by the safety zone. between the national government and
Park between the Hawthorne and The rule will not have a significant the States, or on the distribution of
Marquam Bridges, Portland, OR. The economic impact on a substantial power and responsibilities among the
center span of the Hawthorne and number of small entities for the various levels of government. We have
Marquam bridges will be left open to following reasons: (i) The regulated area analyzed this rule under that Order and
allow commercial traffic through during is limited in size; (ii) the official on- determined that this rule does not have
the event. This event will take place scene patrol may authorize access to the implications for federalism.
from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on the first regulated area; (iii) the regulated area
will affect a limited geographical 6. Protest Activities
or second Saturday and Sunday of
September. The zone is short in location for a limited time; (iv) the Coast The Coast Guard respects the First
duration and will allow waterway users Guard will make notifications via Amendment rights of protesters.
to enter or transit through the zone maritime advisories so mariners can Protesters are asked to contact the
when deemed safe by the Captain of the adjust their plans accordingly; and (v) person listed in the FOR FURTHER
Port or his designated representative. vessel traffic will be able to pass the INFORMATION CONTACT section to
safety zone with permission from the coordinate protest activities so that your
E. Regulatory Analyses COTP representative. message can be received without
We developed this rule after If you think that your business, jeopardizing the safety or security of
considering numerous statutes and organization, or governmental people, places or vessels.
executive orders related to rulemaking. jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
Below we summarize our analyses 7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
and that this rule would have a
based on these statutes and executive significant economic impact on it, The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
orders. please submit a comment (see of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it Federal agencies to assess the effects of
1. Regulatory Planning and Review their discretionary regulatory actions. In
qualifies and how and to what degree
This rule is not a significant this rule would economically affect it. particular, the Act addresses actions
regulatory action under section 3(f) of that may result in the expenditure by a
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory 3. Assistance for Small Entities State, local, or tribal government, in the
Planning and Review, as supplemented Under section 213(a) of the Small aggregate, or by the private sector of
by Executive Order 13563, Improving Business Regulatory Enforcement $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), more in any one year. Though this rule
does not require an assessment of we want to assist small entities in will not result in such expenditure, we
potential costs and benefits under understanding this rule. If the rule do discuss the effects of this rule
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 would affect your small business, elsewhere in this preamble.
or under section 1 of Executive Order organization, or governmental
13563. The Office of Management and jurisdiction and you have questions 8. Taking of Private Property
Budget has not reviewed it under those concerning its provisions or options for This rule will not cause a taking of
Orders. The Coast Guard has made this compliance, please contact the person private property or otherwise have
determination based on the fact that the listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION taking implications under Executive
regulated area created by this rule will CONTACT above. Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
not significantly affect the maritime Small businesses may send comments Interference with Constitutionally
public because vessels may still on the actions of Federal employees Protected Property Rights.
coordinate their transit with the Coast who enforce, or otherwise determine
9. Civil Justice Reform
Guard in the vicinity of the safety zone. compliance with, Federal regulations to
Additionally, the Safety Zone which the Small Business and Agriculture This rule meets applicable standards
will be enforced is minimal in duration. Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
and the Regional Small Business Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
2. Impact on Small Entities minimize litigation, eliminate
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 Ombudsman evaluates these actions ambiguity, and reduce burden.
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, annually and rates each agency’s 10. Protection of Children From
requires federal agencies to consider the responsiveness to small business. If you Environmental Health Risks
potential impact of regulations on small wish to comment on actions by
entities during rulemaking. The term employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– We have analyzed this rule under
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small 888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The Executive Order 13045, Protection of
businesses, not-for-profit organizations Coast Guard will not retaliate against Children from Environmental Health
that are independently owned and small entities that question or complain Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
operated and are not dominant in their about this rule or any policy or action an economically significant rule and
fields, and governmental jurisdictions of the Coast Guard. does not create an environmental risk to
with populations of less than 50,000. health or risk to safety that may
The Coast Guard did not receive 4. Collection of Information disproportionately affect children.
comments from the Small Business This rule will not call for a new 11. Indian Tribal Governments
Administration on this rule. collection of information under the
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 This rule does not have tribal
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have U.S.C. 3501–3520). implications under Executive Order
a significant economic impact on a 13175, Consultation and Coordination
substantial number of small entities. 5. Federalism with Indian Tribal Governments,
This rule may affect the following A rule has implications for federalism because it does not have a substantial
entities, some of which may be small under Executive Order 13132, direct effect on one or more Indian

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:29 May 13, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14MYR1.SGM 14MYR1

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 93 / Thursday, May 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 27567

tribes, on the relationship between the Dated: April 17, 2015. resolved any appeals resulting from this
Federal Government and Indian tribes, D.J. Travers, notification.
or on the distribution of power and Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the This final rule is issued in accordance
responsibilities between the Federal Port, Sector Columbia River. with section 110 of the Flood Disaster
Government and Indian tribes. [FR Doc. 2015–11018 Filed 5–13–15; 8:45 am] Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4104,
12. Energy Effects
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P and 44 CFR part 67. FEMA has
developed criteria for floodplain
This action is not a ‘‘significant management in floodprone areas in
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND accordance with 44 CFR part 60.
energy action’’ under Executive Order
SECURITY
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations Interested lessees and owners of real
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Federal Emergency Management property are encouraged to review the
Distribution, or Use. Agency proof Flood Insurance Study and FIRM
available at the address cited below for
13. Technical Standards each community. The BFEs and
44 CFR Part 67
This rule does not use technical modified BFEs are made final in the
standards. Therefore, we did not [Docket ID FEMA–2014–0002] communities listed below. Elevations at
consider the use of voluntary consensus selected locations in each community
Final Flood Elevation Determinations are shown.
standards.
AGENCY: Federal Emergency National Environmental Policy Act.
14. Environment Management Agency, DHS. This final rule is categorically excluded
ACTION: Final rule.
from the requirements of 44 CFR part
We have analyzed this rule under
10, Environmental Consideration. An
Department of Homeland Security
SUMMARY: Base (1-percent-annual- environmental impact assessment has
Management Directive 023–01 and not been prepared.
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, chance) Flood Elevations (BFEs) and
which guide the Coast Guard in modified BFEs are made final for the Regulatory Flexibility Act. As flood
communities listed below. The BFEs elevation determinations are not within
complying with the National
and modified BFEs are the basis for the the scope of the Regulatory Flexibility
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
floodplain management measures that Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, a regulatory
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
each community is required either to flexibility analysis is not required.
have made a preliminary determination adopt or to show evidence of being
that this action is one of a category of Regulatory Classification. This final
already in effect in order to qualify or
actions that do not individually or rule is not a significant regulatory action
remain qualified for participation in the
cumulatively have a significant effect on under the criteria of section 3(f) of
National Flood Insurance Program
the human environment. This rule Executive Order 12866 of September 30,
(NFIP).
involves the creation of one safety zone 1993, Regulatory Planning and Review,
around a marine event to protect the DATES: The date of issuance of the Flood 58 FR 51735.
maritime public. This rule is Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) showing Executive Order 13132, Federalism.
categorically excluded from further BFEs and modified BFEs for each This final rule involves no policies that
community. This date may be obtained have federalism implications under
review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure
by contacting the office where the maps Executive Order 13132.
2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. A
are available for inspection as indicated
preliminary environmental analysis in the table below. Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
checklist supporting this determination Reform. This final rule meets the
ADDRESSES: The final BFEs for each
and a Categorical Exclusion applicable standards of Executive Order
Determination are available in the community are available for inspection 12988.
at the office of the Chief Executive
docket where indicated under
Officer of each community. The List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 67
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
respective addresses are listed in the
information that may lead to the Administrative practice and
table below.
discovery of a significant environmental procedure, Flood insurance, Reporting
impact from this rule. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis
and recordkeeping requirements.
Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 Management Branch, Federal Insurance Accordingly, 44 CFR part 67 is
and Mitigation Administration, Federal amended as follows:
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation Emergency Management Agency, 500 C
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, PART 67—[AMENDED]
requirements, Security measures, (202) 646–4064, or (email)
Waterways. Luis.Rodriguez3@fema.dhs.gov. ■ 1. The authority citation for part 67
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
continues to read as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
Federal Emergency Management Agency Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.;
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1978, 3 CFR,
(FEMA) makes the final determinations
listed below for the modified BFEs for 1978 Comp., p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367,
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES

■ For the reasons discussed in the each community listed. These modified 3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 376.
preamble, the interim rule amending 33 elevations have been published in § 67.11 [Amended]
CFR part 165 which was published at 79 newspapers of local circulation and 90
FR 62829 on October 21, 2014 is days have elapsed since that ■ 2. The tables published under the
adopted as a final rule without change. publication. The Deputy Associate authority of § 67.11 are amended as
Administrator for Mitigation has follows:

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:34 May 13, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14MYR1.SGM 14MYR1

Document Created: 2015-12-15 15:33:12
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 15:33:12

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective June 15, 2015.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, call or email Kenneth Lawrenson, Waterways Management Division, Marine Safety Unit Portland, Coast Guard; telephone 503-240-9319, email [email protected] If you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
FR Citation		80 FR 27565
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

80 FR 27565 - Safety Zone; Portland Dragon Boat Races, Portland, OR

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 93 (May 14, 2015)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard