80 FR 27621 - Lead; Renovation, Repair and Painting Program; Lead Test Kit Stakeholder Meeting; Notice of Public Meeting

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 93 (May 14, 2015)

Page Range		27621-27623
FR Document		2015-11669

On April 22, 2008, EPA published the Lead Renovation, Repair and Painting (RRP) rule, which established performance recognition criteria for lead test kits for use as an option to determine if regulated lead-based paint is not present in target housing and child- occupied facilities. The use of an EPA-recognized lead test kit, when used by a trained professional, can reliably determine that regulated lead-based paint is not present by virtue of a negative result. The RRP rule also established negative-response and positive-response criteria outlined in the CFR for lead test kits recognized by EPA. This document announces EPA's plan to hold a meeting for interested stakeholders and the public on Thursday, June 4, 2015. At the meeting, EPA is seeking information related to: The existing market for lead test kits as referenced in the 2008 RRP rule; the development or modification of lead test kit(s) that may meet EPA's positive-response criterion (in addition to the negative-response criterion); and other alternatives for lead-based paint field testing.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 93 (Thursday, May 14, 2015)

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 93 (Thursday, May 14, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 27621-27623]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-11669]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 745

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2005-0049; FRL-9927-40]


Lead; Renovation, Repair and Painting Program; Lead Test Kit 
Stakeholder Meeting; Notice of Public Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

[[Page 27622]]


ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On April 22, 2008, EPA published the Lead Renovation, Repair 
and Painting (RRP) rule, which established performance recognition 
criteria for lead test kits for use as an option to determine if 
regulated lead-based paint is not present in target housing and child-
occupied facilities. The use of an EPA-recognized lead test kit, when 
used by a trained professional, can reliably determine that regulated 
lead-based paint is not present by virtue of a negative result. The RRP 
rule also established negative-response and positive-response criteria 
outlined in the CFR for lead test kits recognized by EPA. This document 
announces EPA's plan to hold a meeting for interested stakeholders and 
the public on Thursday, June 4, 2015. At the meeting, EPA is seeking 
information related to: The existing market for lead test kits as 
referenced in the 2008 RRP rule; the development or modification of 
lead test kit(s) that may meet EPA's positive-response criterion (in 
addition to the negative-response criterion); and other alternatives 
for lead-based paint field testing.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Thursday, June 4, 2015 from 10 a.m. 
to 12 p.m.
    Requests to attend the meeting should be sent to the Agency's lead 
information Contact Us form at http://www2.epa.gov/lead/forms/contact-us or the technical information points of contact under FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT. Upon request, Web and telephone conferencing 
information will be provided for those who wish to attend the meeting 
remotely. RSVP responses confirming attendance to the meeting either in 
person or remotely should be sent to the Agency's lead information 
Contact Us form at http://www2.epa.gov/lead/forms/contact-us or the 
technical persons listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT on or 
before May 26, 2015. Requests to share information on the related 
topics at the meeting should be sent to the Agency's lead information 
Contact Us form at http://www2.epa.gov/lead/forms/contact-us or the 
technical persons listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT on or 
before May 26, 2015. Additionally, registered participants who wish to 
provide responses to the requested lead test kit topics during the 
meeting should notify the Agency via EPA's lead information Contact Us 
form at http://www2.epa.gov/lead/forms/contact-us or the technical 
persons listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT on or before May 
26, 2015.
    To request accommodation of a disability, please contact the 
technical person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, 
preferably by May 26, 2015, to give EPA as much time as possible to 
process your request.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at EPA William Jefferson Clinton 
East Building, 1201 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20004.
    Meeting participants and other interested parties who wish to 
respond in writing to the requested lead test kit topics outlined 
above, as well as the forthcoming Information Docket, may submit 
written materials identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA-
HQ-OPPT-2005-0049, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit 
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business 
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted 
by statute.
     Mail: Document Control Office (7407M), Office of Pollution 
Prevention and Toxics (OPPT), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand 
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the 
instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.htm.
    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along 
with more information about dockets generally, are available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. The docket for this action will remain open until 
July 6, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical information contact: 
Christina Wadlington, National Program Chemicals Division (7404M), 
Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection 
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone 
number: (202) 566-1859; email address: [email protected] or 
Toiya Goodlow, National Program Chemicals Division (7404M), Office of 
Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: (202) 
566-2305; email address: [email protected].
    For general information contact: The National Lead Information 
Center, ABVI-Goodwill, 422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; 
telephone number: 1-800-424 -LEAD (5323); online information request 
form: http://www2.epa.gov/lead/forms/lead-hotline-national-lead-information-center.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    This document is directed to stakeholders that develop, manufacture 
and/or sell lead test kits or other lead-based paint field testing 
instruments. You may be potentially affected by this action if you 
manufacture or sell lead test kits, or if you use lead test kits to 
determine if lead-safe work practices are required under the RRP rule 
to perform renovations for compensation in target housing or child-
occupied facilities. Examples of child-occupied facilities are day-care 
centers, preschools, and kindergarten classrooms.

B. How can I get copies of this document and other related information?

    The docket for this action, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OPPT-2005-0049, is available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the 
Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics Docket (OPPT Docket), 
Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA William 
Jefferson Clinton West Building, Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., 
Washington, DC 20004. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The 
telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the 
telephone number for the OPPT Docket is (202) 566-0280. Please review 
the visitor instructions and additional information about the docket 
available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. EPA will provide further 
information regarding topics to be discussed at the meeting in an 
Information Document to registered participants. That information also 
will be posted on www2.epa.gov/lead and placed in the docket for this 
action.

C. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through 
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the 
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or 
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as 
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the 
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one 
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as 
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information 
claimed as CBI

[[Page 27623]]

must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. Information so 
marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set 
forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments, 
remember to:
    i. Identify this document by docket ID number and other identifying 
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
    ii. Follow directions. Follow the detailed instructions as provided 
under ADDRESSES. Respond to specific questions posed by the Agency.
    iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives.
    iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information 
and/or data that you used.
    v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you 
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be 
reproduced by the Agency and others.
    vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and 
suggest alternatives.
    vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of 
profanity or personal threats.
    viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period 
deadline identified in this document.

II. Background

    In the Federal Register of April 22, 2008 (73 FR 21692) (FRL-8355-
7), EPA published the Lead-Based Paint Renovation, Repair and Painting 
rule, which requires contractors to use lead-safe work practices during 
renovation, repair, and painting activities that disturb lead-based 
paint in target housing and child-occupied facilities built before 1978 
unless a determination can be made that no lead-based paint would be 
disturbed during the renovation or repair. The use of an EPA-recognized 
lead test kit, when used by a trained professional, can reliably 
determine that regulated lead-based paint is not present by virtue of a 
negative result. The federal standards for lead-based paint in target 
housing and child-occupied facilities is a lead content in paint that 
equals or exceeds a level of 1.0 milligram per square centimeter (mg/
cm\2\) or 0.5 percent by weight. If regulated lead-based paint is not 
present, there is no requirement to employ lead-safe work practices 
under the RRP rule.
    The RRP rule established negative-response and positive-response 
criteria outlined in 40 CFR 745.88(c) for lead test kits recognized by 
EPA. Lead test kits recognized before September 1, 2010 must meet only 
the negative-response criterion outlined in 40 CFR 745.88(c)(1). The 
negative-response criterion states that for paint containing lead at or 
above the regulated level, 1.0 mg/cm\2\ or 0.5 percent by weight, a 
demonstrated probability (with 95% confidence) of a negative response 
less than or equal to 5 percent of the time must be met. The 
recognition of kits that meet only this criterion will last until EPA 
publicizes its recognition of the first test kit that meets both of the 
criteria outlined in the rule.
    Lead test kits recognized after September 1, 2010 must meet both 
the negative-response and positive-response criteria outlined in 40 CFR 
745.88(c)(1)-(2). The positive-response criterion states that for paint 
containing lead below the regulated level, 1.0 mg/cm\2\ or 0.5% by 
weight, a demonstrated probability (with 95% confidence) of a positive 
response less than or equal to 10% of the time must be met. 
Qualitatively speaking, lead test kits recognized by EPA should also 
serve as a quick, inexpensive, reliable, and easy to perform option for 
lead-based paint testing in the field.
    Despite the EPA's commitment of resources to this effort, to date 
no test kit has met both of the performance criteria outlined in the 
RRP rule. However, there are two EPA-recognized test kits commercially 
available nationwide that meet the false-negative criterion and 
continue to be recognized by EPA. Therefore, in an effort to understand 
the current state of the science for lead test kits and lead-based 
paint field testing alternatives, as well as the existing market and 
potential availability of additional test kits, EPA is soliciting input 
from relevant stakeholders. EPA is convening a meeting and webinar for 
interested stakeholders and the public on Thursday, June 4, 2015 to 
seek information related to: (1) The existing market for lead test kits 
as referenced in the 2008 RRP rule; (2) the development or modification 
of lead test kit(s) that may meet EPA's positive-response criterion (in 
addition to the negative-response criterion); and (3) other 
alternatives for lead-based paint field testing. EPA will provide 
further information regarding topics to be discussed at the meeting in 
an Information Document to be posted on www2.epa.gov/lead and placed in 
the docket for this action. Meeting participants and other interested 
parties who wish to respond in writing to the requested lead test kit 
topics outlined above, as well as the forthcoming Information Docket, 
may submit written materials to the docket until July 6, 2015.

III. References

    As indicated under ADDRESSES, a docket has been established for 
this rulemaking under docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2005-0049. The 
docket includes this document and other information.

EPA. Lead; Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program; Final Rule. 
Federal Register, April 22, 2008 (73 FR 21692) (FRL-8355-7).

    Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.

    Dated: May 8, 2015.
James Jones,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution 
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2015-11669 Filed 5-13-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 93 / Thursday, May 14, 2015 / Proposed Rules 27621

If you think that your business, proposed rule will not result in such an (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
organization, or governmental expenditure, we do discuss the effects of have made a preliminary determination
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity this rule elsewhere in this preamble. that this action is one of a category of
and that this rule would have a actions which do not individually or
8. Taking of Private Property
significant economic impact on it, cumulatively have a significant effect on
please submit a comment (see This proposed rule would not cause a the human environment. This proposed
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it taking of private property or otherwise rule simply amends the operating
qualifies and how and to what degree have taking implications under regulations or procedures for
this rule would economically affect it. Executive Order 12630, Governmental drawbridges. This rule is categorically
Actions and Interference with excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
3. Assistance for Small Entities Constitutionally Protected Property (32)(e), of the Instruction.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Rights. Under figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of
Business Regulatory Enforcement the Instruction, an environmental
9. Civil Justice Reform analysis checklist and a categorical
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in This proposed rule meets applicable exclusion determination are not
understanding this proposed rule. If the standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of required for this rule. We seek any
rule would affect your small business, Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice comments or information that may lead
organization, or governmental Reform, to minimize litigation, to the discovery of a significant
jurisdiction and you have questions eliminate ambiguity, and reduce environmental impact from this
concerning its provisions or options for burden. proposed rule.
compliance, please contact the person 10. Protection of Children List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will We have analyzed this proposed rule Bridges.
not retaliate against small entities that under Executive Order 13045, For the reasons discussed in the
question or complain about this Protection of Children from preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
proposed rule or any policy or action of Environmental Health Risks and Safety amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
the Coast Guard. Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
4. Collection of Information environmental risk to health or risk to OPERATION REGULATIONS
This proposed rule would call for no safety that might disproportionately
■ 1. The authority citation for part 117
new collection of information under the affect children.
continues to read as follows:
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
11. Indian Tribal Governments Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
This proposed rule does not have and Department of Homeland Security
5. Federalism tribal implications under Executive Delegation No. 0170.1.
A rule has implications for federalism Order 13175, Consultation and ■ 2. In § 117.1041, revise the section
under Executive Order 13132, Coordination with Indian Tribal heading and paragraph (a)(2) to read as
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct Governments, because it would not have follows:
effect on the States, on the relationship a substantial direct effect on one or
§ 117.1041 Drawbridge Operation
between the national government and more Indian tribes, on the relationship Regulation; Duwamish River; Seattle, WA.
the States, or on the distribution of between the Federal Government and
(a) * * *
power and responsibilities among the Indian tribes, or on the distribution of (2) The draw of the South Park Bridge,
various levels of government. We have power and responsibilities between the mile 3.8, need not be opened for the
analyzed this proposed rule under that Federal Government and Indian tribes passage of vessels from 6:00 a.m. to 9:00
Order and have determined that it does (make sure we send NPRM to local a.m. and from 3:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.,
not have implications for federalism. Tribe). Monday through Friday except, Federal
6. Protest Activities 12. Energy Effects holidays, other than Columbus Day.
The Coast Guard respects the First This proposed rule is not a * * * * *
Amendment rights of protesters. ‘‘significant energy action’’ under Dated: April 29, 2015.
Protesters are asked to contact the Executive Order 13211, Actions R.T. Gromlich,
person listed in the FOR FURTHER Concerning Regulations That Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
INFORMATION CONTACT section to Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Thirteenth Coast Guard District.
coordinate protest activities so that your Distribution, or Use. [FR Doc. 2015–11677 Filed 5–13–15; 8:45 am]
message can be received without BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
jeopardizing the safety or security of 13. Technical Standards
people, places or vessels. This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act not consider the use of voluntary AGENCY
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act consensus standards.
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 40 CFR Part 745
14. Environment
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In We have analyzed this rule under [EPA–HQ–OPPT–2005–0049; FRL–9927–40]
particular, the Act addresses actions Department of Homeland Security
Lead; Renovation, Repair and Painting
that may result in the expenditure by a Management Directive 023–01 and
Program; Lead Test Kit Stakeholder
State, local, or tribal government, in the Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
Meeting; Notice of Public Meeting
aggregate, or by the private sector of which guides the Coast Guard in
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or complying with the National AGENCY: Environmental Protection
more in any one year. Though this Environmental Policy Act of 1969 Agency (EPA).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:00 May 13, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\14MYP1.SGM 14MYP1

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 93 / Thursday, May 14, 2015 / Proposed Rules 27623

must be submitted for inclusion in the 2010 must meet only the negative- materials to the docket until July 6,
public docket. Information so marked response criterion outlined in 40 CFR 2015.
will not be disclosed except in 745.88(c)(1). The negative-response
III. References
accordance with procedures set forth in criterion states that for paint containing
40 CFR part 2. lead at or above the regulated level, 1.0 As indicated under ADDRESSES, a
2. Tips for preparing your comments. mg/cm2 or 0.5 percent by weight, a docket has been established for this
When submitting comments, remember demonstrated probability (with 95% rulemaking under docket ID number
to: confidence) of a negative response less EPA–HQ–OPPT–2005–0049. The docket
i. Identify this document by docket ID than or equal to 5 percent of the time includes this document and other
number and other identifying must be met. The recognition of kits that information.
information (subject heading, Federal meet only this criterion will last until EPA. Lead; Renovation, Repair, and Painting
Register date and page number). EPA publicizes its recognition of the Program; Final Rule. Federal Register,
ii. Follow directions. Follow the first test kit that meets both of the April 22, 2008 (73 FR 21692) (FRL–
detailed instructions as provided under criteria outlined in the rule. 8355–7).
ADDRESSES. Respond to specific Lead test kits recognized after Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.
questions posed by the Agency. September 1, 2010 must meet both the
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; Dated: May 8, 2015.
negative-response and positive-response
suggest alternatives. James Jones,
criteria outlined in 40 CFR 745.88(c)(1)–
iv. Describe any assumptions and (2). The positive-response criterion Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical
provide any technical information and/ Safety and Pollution Prevention.
states that for paint containing lead
or data that you used. below the regulated level, 1.0 mg/cm2 or [FR Doc. 2015–11669 Filed 5–13–15; 8:45 am]
v. If you estimate potential costs or BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
0.5% by weight, a demonstrated
burdens, explain how you arrived at
probability (with 95% confidence) of a
your estimate in sufficient detail to
positive response less than or equal to
allow for it to be reproduced by the DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
10% of the time must be met.
Agency and others.
vi. Provide specific examples to Qualitatively speaking, lead test kits
recognized by EPA should also serve as Office of the Secretary
illustrate your concerns and suggest
alternatives. a quick, inexpensive, reliable, and easy
to perform option for lead-based paint 43 CFR Part 2
vii. Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity testing in the field. [156D0102DM/DS10700000/
Despite the EPA’s commitment of DMSN00000.000000/DX.10701.CEN00000]
or personal threats.
viii. Make sure to submit your resources to this effort, to date no test RIN 1090–AB10
comments by the comment period kit has met both of the performance
deadline identified in this document. criteria outlined in the RRP rule. Privacy Act Regulations
However, there are two EPA-recognized
II. Background test kits commercially available AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Interior.
In the Federal Register of April 22, nationwide that meet the false-negative ACTION: Proposed rule.
2008 (73 FR 21692) (FRL–8355–7), EPA criterion and continue to be recognized SUMMARY: The Department of the
published the Lead-Based Paint by EPA. Therefore, in an effort to Interior is proposing to amend its
Renovation, Repair and Painting rule, understand the current state of the regulations to exempt certain records in
which requires contractors to use lead- science for lead test kits and lead-based the Indian Arts and Crafts Board system
safe work practices during renovation, paint field testing alternatives, as well of records from one or more provisions
repair, and painting activities that as the existing market and potential of the Privacy Act because of criminal,
disturb lead-based paint in target availability of additional test kits, EPA civil, and administrative law
housing and child-occupied facilities is soliciting input from relevant enforcement requirements.
built before 1978 unless a determination stakeholders. EPA is convening a
DATES: Submit written comments on or
can be made that no lead-based paint meeting and webinar for interested
stakeholders and the public on before July 13, 2015.
would be disturbed during the
renovation or repair. The use of an EPA- Thursday, June 4, 2015 to seek ADDRESSES: Send written comments,
recognized lead test kit, when used by information related to: (1) The existing identified by RIN number 1090–AB10,
a trained professional, can reliably market for lead test kits as referenced in by one of the following methods:
determine that regulated lead-based the 2008 RRP rule; (2) the development • Federal e-Rulemaking Portal:
paint is not present by virtue of a or modification of lead test kit(s) that http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
negative result. The federal standards may meet EPA’s positive-response instructions for submitting comments.
for lead-based paint in target housing criterion (in addition to the negative- • Mail: Teri Barnett, Departmental
and child-occupied facilities is a lead response criterion); and (3) other Privacy Officer, U.S. Department of the
content in paint that equals or exceeds alternatives for lead-based paint field Interior, 1849 C Street NW., Mail Stop
a level of 1.0 milligram per square testing. EPA will provide further 5547 MIB, Washington, DC 20240.
centimeter (mg/cm2) or 0.5 percent by information regarding topics to be • Email: Teri Barnett, Departmental
weight. If regulated lead-based paint is discussed at the meeting in an Privacy Officer, U.S. Department of the
Interior, Privacy@ios.doi.gov.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

not present, there is no requirement to Information Document to be posted on
employ lead-safe work practices under www2.epa.gov/lead and placed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Teri
the RRP rule. docket for this action. Meeting Barnett, Departmental Privacy Officer,
The RRP rule established negative- participants and other interested parties U.S. Department of the Interior, 1849 C
response and positive-response criteria who wish to respond in writing to the Street NW., Mail Stop 5547 MIB,
outlined in 40 CFR 745.88(c) for lead requested lead test kit topics outlined Washington, DC 20240. Email at
test kits recognized by EPA. Lead test above, as well as the forthcoming Privacy@ios.doi.gov.
kits recognized before September 1, Information Docket, may submit written SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:00 May 13, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\14MYP1.SGM 14MYP1

Document Created: 2015-12-15 15:33:03
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 15:33:03

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Notice of meeting.
Dates		The meeting will be held on Thursday, June 4, 2015 from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m.
Contact		For technical information contact: Christina Wadlington, National Program Chemicals Division (7404M), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone
FR Citation		80 FR 27621