80 FR 27623 - Privacy Act Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of the Secretary Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 93 (May 14, 2015)
Office of the Secretary
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 93 (May 14, 2015)
| Page Range | 27623-27626 | |
| FR Document | 2015-11686 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 93 (Thursday, May 14, 2015)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 27623-27626] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-11686] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Office of the Secretary 43 CFR Part 2 [156D0102DM/DS10700000/DMSN00000.000000/DX.10701.CEN00000] RIN 1090-AB10 Privacy Act Regulations AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Interior. ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Department of the Interior is proposing to amend its regulations to exempt certain records in the Indian Arts and Crafts Board system of records from one or more provisions of the Privacy Act because of criminal, civil, and administrative law enforcement requirements. DATES: Submit written comments on or before July 13, 2015. ADDRESSES: Send written comments, identified by RIN number 1090-AB10, by one of the following methods:Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Mail: Teri Barnett, Departmental Privacy Officer, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street NW., Mail Stop 5547 MIB, Washington, DC 20240. Email: Teri Barnett, Departmental Privacy Officer, U.S. Department of the Interior, [email protected]. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Teri Barnett, Departmental Privacy Officer, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street NW., Mail Stop 5547 MIB, Washington, DC 20240. Email at [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: [[Page 27624]] Background The Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, 5 U.S.C. 552a, governs the means by which the U.S. Government collects, maintains, uses and disseminates personally identifiable information. The Privacy Act applies to records about individuals that are maintained in a ``system of records.'' A system of records is a group of any records under the control of an agency from which information about an individual is retrieved by the name of the individual or by some identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to the individual. See 5 U.S.C. 552a(a)(4) and (5). An individual may request access to records containing information about him or herself, 5 U.S.C. 552a(b), (c) and (d). However, the Privacy Act authorizes Federal agencies to exempt systems of records from access by individuals under certain circumstances, such as where the access or disclosure of such information would impede national security or law enforcement efforts. Exemptions from Privacy Act provisions must be established by regulation, 5 U.S.C. 552a(k). The Department of the Interior (DOI), Office of the Secretary, created the Indian Arts and Crafts Board, DOI-24, system of records to assist the Department of the Interior's Indian Arts and Crafts Board (IACB) in overseeing the implementation of the Indian Arts and Crafts Act of 1990, as amended. The purposes of this system of records include documenting investigations, including investigations by DOI law enforcement, of individuals or organizations that offer or display for sale or sell any good, with or without a Government trademark, in a manner that falsely suggests it is Indian produced, an Indian product, or the product of a particular Indian or Indian tribe or Indian arts and crafts organization within the United States. Additionally, the system helps the IACB manage its program activities, promote the economic development of American Indians and Alaska Natives of Federally recognized tribes through the expansion of the Indian arts and crafts market; provide promotional opportunities, general business advice, and information on the Indian Arts and Crafts Act to Native American artists, craftspeople, businesses, museums, and cultural centers of Federally recognized tribes; manage museum exhibitions and activities; and produce a source directory of American Indian and Alaska Native owned and operated arts and crafts businesses. In this notice of proposed rulemaking, the Department of the Interior is proposing to exempt the Indian Arts and Crafts Board system of records from certain provisions of the Privacy Act pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) because of criminal, civil, and administrative law enforcement requirements. Under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), the head of a Federal agency may promulgate rules to exempt a system of records from certain provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a if the system of records is ``investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes Because this system of records contains investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes within the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), the Department of the Interior proposes to exempt the Indian Arts and Crafts Board system of records from the following provisions: 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d), (e)(1),(e)(4)(G) through (e)(4)(I), and (f). Where a release would not interfere with or adversely affect law enforcement activities, including but not limited to revealing sensitive information or compromising confidential sources, the exemption may be waived on a case-by-case basis. Exemptions from these particular subsections are justified for the following reasons: 1. 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3). This section requires an agency to make the accounting of each disclosure of records required by the Privacy Act available upon request to the individual named in the record. Release of the accounting of disclosures could alert the subjects of an investigation to the existence of the investigation and the fact that they are subjects of the investigation. The release of such information to the subjects of an investigation would provide them with significant information concerning the nature of the investigation, and could seriously impede or compromise the investigation; endanger the physical safety of confidential sources, witnesses and their families; and lead to the improper influencing of witnesses, the destruction of evidence, or the fabrication of testimony. 2. 5 U.S.C. 552a(d); (e)(4)(G) and (e)(4)(H); and (f). These sections require an agency to provide notice and disclosure to individuals that a system contains records pertaining to the individual, as well as providing rights of access and amendment. Granting access to investigatory records in the Indian Arts and Crafts Board system of records could inform the subject of an investigation of the existence of that investigation, the nature and scope of the information and evidence obtained, the identity of confidential sources, witnesses, and law enforcement personnel, and could provide information to enable the subject to avoid detection or apprehension. Granting access to such information could seriously impede or compromise an investigation; endanger the physical safety of confidential sources, witnesses, and law enforcement personnel, as well as their families; lead to the improper influencing of witnesses, the destruction of evidence, or the fabrication of testimony; and disclose investigative techniques and procedures. In addition, granting access to such information could disclose security-sensitive, or confidential information and could constitute an unwarranted invasion of the personal privacy of others. 3. 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(1). This section requires the agency to maintain information about an individual only to the extent that such information is relevant or necessary. The application of this provision could impair investigations and law enforcement, because it is not always possible to determine the relevance or necessity of specific information in the early stages of an investigation. Relevance and necessity are often questions of judgment and timing, and it is often only after the information is evaluated that the relevance and necessity of such information can be established. In addition, during the course of the investigation, the investigator may obtain information which is incidental to the main purpose of the investigation, but which may relate to matters under the investigative jurisdiction of another agency. Such information cannot always be readily segregated. Furthermore, during the course of the investigation, an investigator may obtain information concerning the violation of laws outside the scope of the investigator's jurisdiction. In the interest of effective law enforcement, DOI investigators should retain this information, since it could aid in establishing patterns of criminal activity and provide valuable leads for other law enforcement agencies. 4. 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4)(I). This section requires an agency to provide public notice of the categories of sources of records in the system. To the extent this provision is construed to require more detailed disclosure than the broad, generic information currently published in the systems of records notice, an exemption from this provision is necessary to protect the confidentiality of sources of information, and to protect the privacy and physical safety of witnesses and informants. [[Page 27625]] Procedural Requirements 1. Regulatory Planning and Review (E.O. 12866) The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has determined that this rule is not a significant rule and has not reviewed it under the requirements of Executive Order 12866. We have evaluated the impacts of the rule as required by E.O. 12866 and have determined that it does not meet the criteria for a significant regulatory action. The results of our evaluation are given below. (a) This rule will not have an annual effect of $100 million or more on the economy. It will not adversely affect in a material way the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local or tribal governments or communities. (b) This rule would not create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency. (c) This rule does not alter the budgetary effects of entitlements, grants, user fees, concessions, loan programs, water contracts, management agreements, or the rights and obligations of their recipients. (d) This rule does not raise any novel legal or policy issues. 2. Regulatory Flexibility Act The Department of the Interior certifies that this document will not have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.). This rule does not impose a requirement for small businesses to report or keep records on any of the requirements contained in this rule. The exemptions to the Privacy Act apply to individuals, and individuals are not covered entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 3. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule: (a) Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more. (b) Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic regions. (c) Does not have significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of United States-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises. 4. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act This rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate, or on the private sector, of more than $100 million per year. The rule does not have a significant or unique effect on State, local, or tribal governments or the private sector. This rule makes only minor changes to 43 CFR part 2. A statement containing the information required by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required. 5. Takings (E.O. 12630) In accordance with Executive Order 12630, the rule does not have significant takings implications. This rule makes only minor changes to 43 CFR part 2. A takings implication assessment is not required. 6. Federalism (E.O. 13132) In accordance with Executive Order 13132, this rule does not have any federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment. The rule is not associated with, nor will it have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. A Federalism Assessment is not required. 7. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988) This rule complies with the requirements of Executive Order 12988. Specifically, this rule: (a) Does not unduly burden the judicial system. (b) Meets the criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and ambiguity and be written to minimize litigation; and (c) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all regulations be written in clear language and contain clear legal standards. 8. Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O. 13175) In accordance with Executive Order 13175, the Department of the Interior has evaluated this rule and determined that it would have no substantial effects on Federally recognized Indian tribes. 9. Paperwork Reduction Act This rule does not require an information collection from 10 or more parties and a submission under the Paperwork Reduction Act is not required. 10. National Environmental Policy Act This rule does not constitute a major Federal action and would not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment. Therefore, this rule does not require the preparation of an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement under the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. 11. Data Quality Act In developing this rule, there was no need to conduct or use a study, experiment, or survey requiring peer review under the Data Quality Act (Pub. L. 106-554). 12. Effects on Energy Supply (E.O. 13211). This rule is not a significant energy action under the definition in Executive Order 13211. A Statement of Energy Effects is not required. 13. Clarity of This Regulation We are required by Executive Order 12866 and 12988, the Plain Writing Act of 2010 (H.R. 946), and the Presidential Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write all rules in plain language. This means each rule we publish must: --Be logically organized; --Use the active voice to address readers directly; --Use clear language rather than jargon; --Be divided into short sections and sentences; and --Use lists and table wherever possible. List of Subjects in 43 CFR Part 2 Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential information, Courts, Freedom of Information Act, Privacy Act. Dated: April 15, 2015. Kristen J. Sarri, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Management and Budget. For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of the Interior proposes to amend 43 CFR part 2 as follows: PART 2--FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT; RECORDS AND TESTIMONY 0 1. The authority citation for part 2 continues to read as follows: Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552, 552a, 553; 31 U.S.C. 3717; 43 U.S.C. 1460, 1461. 0 2. Amend Sec. 2.254 by adding paragraph (b)(17) to read as follows: Sec. 2.254 Exemptions. * * * * * (b) * * * [[Page 27626]] (17) Indian Arts and Crafts Board, DOI-24. * * * * * [FR Doc. 2015-11686 Filed 5-13-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4334-12-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 93 / Thursday, May 14, 2015 / Proposed Rules 27623
must be submitted for inclusion in the 2010 must meet only the negative- materials to the docket until July 6,
public docket. Information so marked response criterion outlined in 40 CFR 2015.
will not be disclosed except in 745.88(c)(1). The negative-response
III. References
accordance with procedures set forth in criterion states that for paint containing
40 CFR part 2. lead at or above the regulated level, 1.0 As indicated under ADDRESSES, a
2. Tips for preparing your comments. mg/cm2 or 0.5 percent by weight, a docket has been established for this
When submitting comments, remember demonstrated probability (with 95% rulemaking under docket ID number
to: confidence) of a negative response less EPA–HQ–OPPT–2005–0049. The docket
i. Identify this document by docket ID than or equal to 5 percent of the time includes this document and other
number and other identifying must be met. The recognition of kits that information.
information (subject heading, Federal meet only this criterion will last until EPA. Lead; Renovation, Repair, and Painting
Register date and page number). EPA publicizes its recognition of the Program; Final Rule. Federal Register,
ii. Follow directions. Follow the first test kit that meets both of the April 22, 2008 (73 FR 21692) (FRL–
detailed instructions as provided under criteria outlined in the rule. 8355–7).
ADDRESSES. Respond to specific Lead test kits recognized after Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.
questions posed by the Agency. September 1, 2010 must meet both the
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; Dated: May 8, 2015.
negative-response and positive-response
suggest alternatives. James Jones,
criteria outlined in 40 CFR 745.88(c)(1)–
iv. Describe any assumptions and (2). The positive-response criterion Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical
provide any technical information and/ Safety and Pollution Prevention.
states that for paint containing lead
or data that you used. below the regulated level, 1.0 mg/cm2 or [FR Doc. 2015–11669 Filed 5–13–15; 8:45 am]
v. If you estimate potential costs or BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
0.5% by weight, a demonstrated
burdens, explain how you arrived at
probability (with 95% confidence) of a
your estimate in sufficient detail to
positive response less than or equal to
allow for it to be reproduced by the DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
10% of the time must be met.
Agency and others.
vi. Provide specific examples to Qualitatively speaking, lead test kits
recognized by EPA should also serve as Office of the Secretary
illustrate your concerns and suggest
alternatives. a quick, inexpensive, reliable, and easy
to perform option for lead-based paint 43 CFR Part 2
vii. Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity testing in the field. [156D0102DM/DS10700000/
Despite the EPA’s commitment of DMSN00000.000000/DX.10701.CEN00000]
or personal threats.
viii. Make sure to submit your resources to this effort, to date no test RIN 1090–AB10
comments by the comment period kit has met both of the performance
deadline identified in this document. criteria outlined in the RRP rule. Privacy Act Regulations
However, there are two EPA-recognized
II. Background test kits commercially available AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Interior.
In the Federal Register of April 22, nationwide that meet the false-negative ACTION: Proposed rule.
2008 (73 FR 21692) (FRL–8355–7), EPA criterion and continue to be recognized SUMMARY: The Department of the
published the Lead-Based Paint by EPA. Therefore, in an effort to Interior is proposing to amend its
Renovation, Repair and Painting rule, understand the current state of the regulations to exempt certain records in
which requires contractors to use lead- science for lead test kits and lead-based the Indian Arts and Crafts Board system
safe work practices during renovation, paint field testing alternatives, as well of records from one or more provisions
repair, and painting activities that as the existing market and potential of the Privacy Act because of criminal,
disturb lead-based paint in target availability of additional test kits, EPA civil, and administrative law
housing and child-occupied facilities is soliciting input from relevant enforcement requirements.
built before 1978 unless a determination stakeholders. EPA is convening a
DATES: Submit written comments on or
can be made that no lead-based paint meeting and webinar for interested
stakeholders and the public on before July 13, 2015.
would be disturbed during the
renovation or repair. The use of an EPA- Thursday, June 4, 2015 to seek ADDRESSES: Send written comments,
recognized lead test kit, when used by information related to: (1) The existing identified by RIN number 1090–AB10,
a trained professional, can reliably market for lead test kits as referenced in by one of the following methods:
determine that regulated lead-based the 2008 RRP rule; (2) the development • Federal e-Rulemaking Portal:
paint is not present by virtue of a or modification of lead test kit(s) that http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
negative result. The federal standards may meet EPA’s positive-response instructions for submitting comments.
for lead-based paint in target housing criterion (in addition to the negative- • Mail: Teri Barnett, Departmental
and child-occupied facilities is a lead response criterion); and (3) other Privacy Officer, U.S. Department of the
content in paint that equals or exceeds alternatives for lead-based paint field Interior, 1849 C Street NW., Mail Stop
a level of 1.0 milligram per square testing. EPA will provide further 5547 MIB, Washington, DC 20240.
centimeter (mg/cm2) or 0.5 percent by information regarding topics to be • Email: Teri Barnett, Departmental
weight. If regulated lead-based paint is discussed at the meeting in an Privacy Officer, U.S. Department of the
Interior, Privacy@ios.doi.gov.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
not present, there is no requirement to Information Document to be posted on
employ lead-safe work practices under www2.epa.gov/lead and placed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Teri
the RRP rule. docket for this action. Meeting Barnett, Departmental Privacy Officer,
The RRP rule established negative- participants and other interested parties U.S. Department of the Interior, 1849 C
response and positive-response criteria who wish to respond in writing to the Street NW., Mail Stop 5547 MIB,
outlined in 40 CFR 745.88(c) for lead requested lead test kit topics outlined Washington, DC 20240. Email at
test kits recognized by EPA. Lead test above, as well as the forthcoming Privacy@ios.doi.gov.
kits recognized before September 1, Information Docket, may submit written SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:00 May 13, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\14MYP1.SGM 14MYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_27716/page/1.svg)
![27626 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 93 / Thursday, May 14, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(17) Indian Arts and Crafts Board, released on May 6, 2015. It is available the term ‘‘cost,’’ as used in section
DOI–24. on the Commission’s Web site at 224(e), is open to a wide range of
* * * * * http://www.fcc.gov. reasonable interpretations; that the
[FR Doc. 2015–11686 Filed 5–13–15; 8:45 am] Commission’s methodology for
I. Public Notice
BILLING CODE 4334–12–P apportioning ‘‘cost’’ among pole
1. By this document, the Wireline attaches for purposes of the telecom rate
Competition Bureau (Bureau) seeks to is consistent with section 224(e); and
refresh the record on a petition for that the Commission’s justifications for
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
reconsideration or clarification filed by its decision concerning the telecom rate
COMMISSION the National Cable and were reasonable. In addition, the
47 CFR Part 1 Telecommunications Association Commission’s 2015 Open Internet Order
(NCTA), COMPTEL, and tw telecom inc. discussed the concern raised in the
[WC Docket No. 07–245, GN Docket No. 09– (Petitioners) on June 8, 2011 in the
51; DA 15–542]
Petition regarding consequences to the
above-referenced proceedings. goals of the 2011 Pole Attachment Order
2. With respect to the rule concerning if the cost allocation rule were
Parties Asked To Refresh Record the calculation of pole attachment rates
Regarding Petition to Reconsideration interpreted to apply fully only in
charged to telecommunications instances where there are three and five
Cost Allocators Used To Calculate the providers pursuant to section 224(e) of
Telecom Rate for Pole Attachments attaching entities. With regard to any
the Communications Act, Petitioners possible adverse effect on investment
AGENCY: Federal Communications request that ‘‘the rules be clarified or incentives from such an interpretation,
Commission. amended by specifying [that] the cost the Open Internet Order stated that the
ACTION: Proposed rule.
allocator to be applied [will be] based Commission would be ‘‘concerned by
on the number of attaching entities.’’ In
any potential undermining of the gains
SUMMARY: In this document, the support of this request, Petitioners state
the Commission achieved by revising
Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) that, in the 2011 Pole Attachment Order,
the pole attachment rates paid by
seeks to refresh the record on a petition ‘‘the new formula adjusts the cost basis
telecommunications carriers’’ in 2011
for reconsideration or clarification filed to 66 percent in urban service areas and
and accordingly would be ‘‘monitoring
by the National Cable and to 44 percent in rural service areas.
marketplace developments . . . and can
Telecommunications Association When paired with the presumptions
and will promptly take further action in
(NCTA), COMPTEL, and tw telecom inc. that there are five entities on urban
that regard if warranted.’’ Given the
(Petitioners) in the above-referenced poles and three entities on rural poles,
time that has elapsed since the filing
proceedings. Petitioners request that the illustrative calculation almost
exactly equals the cable rate.’’ and original comment cycle on the
‘‘the rules be clarified or amended by NCTA Petition, as well as the
specifying [that] the cost allocator to be Petitioners assert, however, that as
written the rule may be read to address subsequent events discussed above, we
applied [will be] based on the number seek to ensure that the record reflects
of attaching entities.’’ only the cases of the presumed three
and five attaching entities. Therefore, current viewpoints on the issues raised
DATES: Comments are due on or before in the NCTA Petition.
June 4, 2015 and reply comments are Petitioners request that the Commission
due on or before June 15, 2015. clarify or expand the telecom rate II. Procedural Matters
formula to ‘‘provide the corresponding
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, A. Accessible Formats
cost adjustments scaled to other entity
identified by WC Docket No. 07–245 counts.’’ Petitioners request, 5. To request materials in accessible
and GN Docket No. 09–51, by any of the alternatively, that ‘‘the Commission formats for people with disabilities
following methods: could adopt the proposal in the 2010 (braille, large print, electronic files,
• Federal Communications Pole Attachment FNPRM to establish audio format), send an email to fcc504@
Commission’s Web site: http:// the maximum just and reasonable rate fcc.gov or call the Consumer &
fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/. Follow the as the higher of the cable rate . . . or the Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202–
instructions for submitting comments. ‘lower bound’ telecom rate obtained by 418–0530 (voice), 202–418–0432 (tty).
• People with Disabilities: Contact
excluding capital costs from the Contact the FCC to request reasonable
the FCC to request reasonable
definition of ‘cost of providing space’ in accommodations for filing comments
accommodations (accessible format
the existing telecom rate formula.’’ (accessible format documents, sign
documents, sign language interpreters, 3. A Public Notice released on June language interpreters, CARTS, etc.) by
CART, etc.) by email: FCC504@fcc.gov 20, 2011 announced the comment cycle email: FCC504@fcc.gov; phone: (202)
or phone: 202–418–0530 or TTY: 202– for the Petition. The Commission 418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432
418–0432. subsequently published that document (TTY).
For detailed instructions for A National Broadband Plan For Our
submitting comments and additional Future; Petition for Reconsideration, 76 B. Filing Requirements
information on the rulemaking process, FR 44495, July 26, 2011. The 6. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding
see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Commission received comment both for continues to be treated as a ‘‘permit-but-
section of this document. and against the Petition. disclose’’ proceeding in accordance
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 4. After the close of the comment with the Commission’s ex parte rules.
Jonathan Reel, Wireline Competition
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
cycle concerning the Petition, on Persons making ex parte presentations
Bureau, Competition Policy Division, February 26, 2013, the U.S. Court of must file a copy of any written
(202) 418–0637, or send an email to Appeals for the DC Circuit upheld the presentation or a memorandum
johnathan.reel@fcc.gov. 2011 Pole Attachment Order, including summarizing any oral presentation
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a the Commission’s rule for calculating within two business days after the
summary of the Commission’s the pole attachment rate for providers of presentation (unless a different deadline
document in WC Docket No. 07–245, telecommunications services. Among applicable to the Sunshine period
GN Docket Nos. 09–51; DA 15–542 other things, the Court determined that applies). Persons making oral ex parte
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:00 May 13, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\14MYP1.SGM 14MYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_27716/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-15 15:32:59
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 15:32:59
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Submit written comments on or before July 13, 2015. | |
| Contact | Teri Barnett, Departmental Privacy Officer, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street NW., Mail Stop 5547 MIB, Washington, DC 20240. Email at [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 27623 | |
| RIN Number | 1090-AB10 | |
| CFR Associated | Administrative Practice and Procedure; Confidential Information; Courts; Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR