80 FR 27633 - Honey From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 93 (May 14, 2015)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 93 (May 14, 2015)
| Page Range | 27633-27635 | |
| FR Document | 2015-11577 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 93 (Thursday, May 14, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 27633-27635] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-11577] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-863] Honey From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On January 7, 2015, the Department of Commerce (``Department'') published the preliminary results of the twelfth administrative review, covering the period December 1, 2012, through November 30, 2013, of the antidumping duty order on honey from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'').\1\ We gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on the Preliminary Results. After analyzing interested parties' comments, we made no changes for the final results of review. The final antidumping duty margins for this review are listed in the ``Final Results of Review'' section below. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Honey From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 80 FR 862 (January 7, 2015) (``Preliminary Results''). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATES: Effective Date: May 14, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irene Gorelik, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6905. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On January 7, 2015, the Department published the Preliminary Results of this administrative review and invited interested parties to submit comments on our findings. On February 5, 2015, the mandatory respondent, Kunshan Xinlong Food Co., Ltd. (``Kunshan Xinlong''), filed a case brief.\2\ On February 13, 2015, Petitioners \3\ filed a rebuttal brief. The Department did not hold a public hearing pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(d), as interested parties did not request one. We conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the ``Act''). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ We note that the case brief was timely filed on February 5, 2015, despite the erroneous date noted on the cover letter of the case brief. \3\ Petitioners are: American Honey Producers Association and Sioux Honey Association. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 27634]] Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs submitted by parties to this review are addressed in the ``Administrative Review of Honey from the People's Republic of China: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results'' (``Decision Memorandum''), dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by, this notice. A list of the issues which parties raised and to which we respond in the Decision Memorandum is attached to this notice as an Appendix. The Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (``ACCESS''). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Central Records Unit (``CRU''), Room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, parties can obtain a complete version of the Decision Memorandum on the Internet at http://trade.gov/enforcement/frn/index.html. The signed Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Scope of the Order The products covered by the order are natural honey, artificial honey containing more than 50 percent natural honey by weight, preparations of natural honey containing more than 50 percent natural honey by weight and flavored honey.\4\ The merchandise subject to the order is currently classifiable under subheadings 0409.00.00, 1702.90.90 and 2106.90.99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS''). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the Department's written description of the merchandise is dispositive.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Decision Memorandum for a complete description of the Scope of the Order. \5\ See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order And Amendment To Final Determination: Honey from the People's Republic of China, 66 FR 59026 (December 10, 2001). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRC-Wide Entity In the Preliminary Results, the Department indicated its intention to make a determination at the final results with respect to two companies for which the review was timely withdrawn: Fuzhou Shenglinmark Trade Co., Ltd., and Dongtai Peak Honey Industry Co., Ltd.\6\ In the Preliminary Results, we stated that ``because Fuzhou Shenglinmark Trade Co., Ltd. and Dongtai Peak were not eligible for separate-rate status at the initiation of the review, the Department's practice is to refrain from rescinding the review with respect to these two companies at this time . . . '' because ``while the request for review of these companies was timely withdrawn, we preliminarily determine that the companies remain part of the PRC-wide entity, which is under review for these preliminary results.'' \7\ We further stated that we ``will make a determination with respect to the PRC-wide entity at the conclusion of this review.'' \8\ Because there are no changes to the facts regarding these two companies since the Preliminary Results, we continue to find that Fuzhou Shenglinmark Trade Co., Ltd., and Dongtai Peak Honey Industry Co., Ltd. are part of the PRC-wide entity, which is under review. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See Preliminary Results, 80 FR at 862 and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum at pages 1-2 and 3-4. See also Letter from Petitioners re: ``Partial Withdrawal of Request for 12th Administrative Review,'' dated February 28, 2014. \7\ See Preliminary Results, 80 FR at 862 and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum at pages 3-4. \8\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- As discussed in the Preliminary Results, the Department relied on facts available in making its preliminary determination with respect to Kunshan Xinlong, and treated it as part of the PRC-wide entity. We preliminarily drew an adverse inference in selecting from among the facts otherwise available. Because Kunshan Xinlong, as part of the PRC- wide entity, withheld requested information, failed to provide information in a timely manner and in the form requested, and significantly impeded this proceeding, we continue to find that the PRC-wide entity failed to cooperate to the best of its ability and, accordingly, find it appropriate to assign it a margin based on adverse facts available (``AFA''). The Department's determination is in accordance with sections 776(a)(2)(A), (B), (C) and 776(b) of the Act.\9\ For a detailed discussion regarding Kunshan Xinlong, see Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See, e.g., Non-Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings from the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 71 FR 69546 (December 1, 2006) and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 1. See also Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary Results of the First Administrative Review and New Shipper Review, 72 FR 10689, 10692 (March 9, 2007) (decision to apply total AFA to the NME-wide entity) unchanged in Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of the First Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and First New Shipper Review, 72 FR 52052 (September 12, 2007). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Results of Review As a result of this administrative review, the weighted-average dumping margin for the POR is as follows: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Margin Manufacturer/exporter (dollars per kilogram) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ PRC-wide entity 10..................................... 2.63 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Assessment Consistent with these final results, and pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department will direct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. Consistent with AR5 Final Results, we will direct CBP to assess importer-specific assessments rates based on the resulting per-unit (i.e., per kilogram) amount on each entry of the subject merchandise during the review period.\11\ The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of the final results of this review. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ The PRC-wide entity includes: Kunshan Xinlong Food Co., Ltd., Fuzhou Shenglinmark Trade Co., Ltd., and Dongtai Peak Honey Industry Co., Ltd. \11\ See Honey from the People's Republic of China: Final Results and Rescission, In Part, of Aligned Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and New Shipper Review, 73 FR 424321 (July 21, 2008) (``AR5 Final Results''). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales database submitted by an exporter individually examined during this review, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide rate. Additionally, if the Department determines that an exporter under review had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended entries that entered under that exporter's case number will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of these final results of administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the exporter listed above, the cash deposit rate will be established in the final results of this review (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, i.e., less than 0.5 percent, no cash deposit will be required for that company); (2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above that have separate rates, the cash [[Page 27635]] deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate $2.63 per kilogram; and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporters that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Reimbursement of Duties This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties has occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. We are issuing and publishing this administrative review and notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act. Dated: May 7, 2015. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background 1. Scope of the Order 2. Case Timeline III. Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Whether the Department's Rejection of Kunshan Xinlong's Post-Deadline Extension Requests Was Appropriate Comment 2: Whether the Department Properly Disallowed Kunshan Xinlong to Submit a Supplemental Section C Questionnaire Response Comment 3: Whether the Adverse Inference Is Appropriate Comment 4: Whether the AFA Rate Is Appropriate IV. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2015-11577 Filed 5-13-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 93 / Thursday, May 14, 2015 / Notices 27633
Ductile cast iron fittings with for consumption on or after the DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
mechanical joint ends (MJ), or push on publication date, as provided by section
ends (PO), or flanged ends and 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For International Trade Administration
produced to the American Water Works previously investigated or reviewed PRC
Association (‘‘AWWA’’) specifications and non-PRC exporters which are not [A–570–863]
AWWA C110 or AWWA C153 are not under review in this segment of the
included. proceeding but which have separate Honey From the People’s Republic of
Imports of subject merchandise are rates, the cash deposit rate will continue China: Final Results of Antidumping
currently classifiable in the Harmonized to be the exporter-specific rate Duty Administrative Review; 2012–
Tariff Schedule of the United States published for the most recent period; (2) 2013
(‘‘HTSUS’’) under item numbers for all PRC exporters of subject
7307.11.00.30, 7307.11.00.60, AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
merchandise that have not been found International Trade Administration,
7307.19.30.60, 7307.19.30.85,
to be entitled to a separate rate, Department of Commerce.
7326.90.8588. HTSUS subheadings are
including OIC, the cash deposit rate will SUMMARY: On January 7, 2015, the
provided for convenience and customs
purposes. The written description of the be the PRC-wide rate of 75.50 percent; Department of Commerce
scope of the order is dispositive.3 and (3) for all non-PRC exporters of (‘‘Department’’) published the
subject merchandise which have not preliminary results of the twelfth
Period of Review received their own rate, the cash deposit administrative review, covering the
The period of review is April 1, 2013, rate will be the rate applicable to the period December 1, 2012, through
through March 31, 2014. PRC exporter(s) that supplied that non- November 30, 2013, of the antidumping
PRC exporter. These deposit duty order on honey from the People’s
Final Results of Review requirements, when imposed, shall Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’).1 We gave
As noted the Preliminary Results, OIC remain in effect until further notice. interested parties an opportunity to
has not demonstrated its eligibility for a comment on the Preliminary Results.
separate rate. Thus, for these final Notification to Importers Regarding the After analyzing interested parties’
results, the Department continues to Reimbursement of Duties comments, we made no changes for the
find that OIC is part of the PRC-wide This notice serves as a final reminder final results of review. The final
entity and therefore, subject to the rate antidumping duty margins for this
to importers of their responsibility
previously established for the PRC-wide review are listed in the ‘‘Final Results
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
entity (i.e., 75.50 percent). of Review’’ section below.
certificate regarding the reimbursement
Assessment of antidumping duties prior to DATES: Effective Date: May 14, 2015.
liquidation of the relevant entries FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The Department will determine, and
U.S. Customs and Border Protection during this POR. Failure to comply with Irene Gorelik, AD/CVD Operations,
(‘‘CBP’’) shall assess, antidumping this requirement could result in the Office V, Import Administration,
duties on all appropriate entries covered Department’s presumption that International Trade Administration,
by this review.4 The Department intends reimbursement of antidumping duties U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
to issue assessment instructions to CBP has occurred and the subsequent Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
15 days after the date of publication of assessment of doubled antidumping Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
these final results of review. The duties. 482–6905.
Department intends to instruct CBP to SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
liquidate entries of subject merchandise Notification to Interested Parties
Background
from OIC at the PRC-wide rate of 75.50 This notice also serves as a reminder
percent. On January 7, 2015, the Department
to parties subject to the administrative published the Preliminary Results of
Cash Deposit Requirements protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their this administrative review and invited
responsibility concerning the interested parties to submit comments
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon disposition of proprietary information on our findings. On February 5, 2015,
publication of the final results of this disclosed under APO in accordance the mandatory respondent, Kunshan
administrative review for all shipments with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely Xinlong Food Co., Ltd. (‘‘Kunshan
of the subject merchandise from the PRC notification of the destruction of APO Xinlong’’), filed a case brief.2 On
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, materials or conversion to judicial February 13, 2015, Petitioners 3 filed a
protective order is hereby requested. rebuttal brief. The Department did not
3 On April 21, 2009, in consultation with CBP, the Failure to comply with the regulations hold a public hearing pursuant to 19
Department added the following HTSUS and the terms of an APO is a CFR 351.310(d), as interested parties did
classification to the AD/CVD module for pipe
fittings: 7326.90.8588. See Memorandum from
sanctionable violation. not request one. We conducted this
Abdelali Elouaradia, Office Director, Import We are issuing and publishing these administrative review in accordance
Administration, Office 4 to Stephen Claeys, Deputy
results and this notice in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of
Assistant Secretary, Import Administration 1930, as amended (the ‘‘Act’’).
regarding the Final Scope Ruling on Black Cast Iron with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the
Cast, Green Ductile Flange and Twin Tee, Act.
1 See Honey From the People’s Republic of China:
antidumping duty order on non-malleable iron cast
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
pipe fittings from China, dated September 19, 2008; Dated: May 7, 2015. Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
see also Memorandum to the file from Karine Paul Piquado, Administrative Review; 2012–2013, 80 FR 862
Gziryan, Financial Analyst, Office 4, regarding (January 7, 2015) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’).
Module Update adding Harmonized Tariff Schedule Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 2 We note that the case brief was timely filed on
Number for twin tin fitting included in the scope Compliance. February 5, 2015, despite the erroneous date noted
of antidumping order on non-malleable iron cast [FR Doc. 2015–11655 Filed 5–13–15; 8:45 am] on the cover letter of the case brief.
pipe fittings from China, dated April 22, 2009. 3 Petitioners are: American Honey Producers
4 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Association and Sioux Honey Association.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:59 May 13, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14MYN1.SGM 14MYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_27726/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 93 / Thursday, May 14, 2015 / Notices 27635
deposit rate will continue to be the Comment 2: Whether the Department the preliminary determination until no
exporter-specific rate published for the Properly Disallowed Kunshan Xinlong to later than 130 days after the date on
most recent period; (3) for all PRC Submit a Supplemental Section C which the Department initiated the
exporters of subject merchandise which Questionnaire Response investigation.
Comment 3: Whether the Adverse On May 4, 2015, the petitioners 2
have not been found to be entitled to a Inference Is Appropriate
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will Comment 4: Whether the AFA Rate Is
submitted a timely request pursuant to
be the PRC-wide rate $2.63 per Appropriate section 703(c)(1)(A) of the Act and 19
kilogram; and (4) for all non-PRC IV. Recommendation CFR 351.205(e) to postpone the
exporters of subject merchandise which preliminary determinations.3 Therefore,
[FR Doc. 2015–11577 Filed 5–13–15; 8:45 am]
have not received their own rate, the in accordance with section 703(c)(1)(A)
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
cash deposit rate will be the rate of the Act, we are fully extending the
applicable to the PRC exporters that due date for the preliminary
supplied that non-PRC exporter. These DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE determination to not later than 130 days
deposit requirements, when imposed, after the day on which the investigation
shall remain in effect until further International Trade Administration was initiated. As a result, the deadline
notice. for completion of the preliminary
[C–570–025, C–533–862, C–523–811] determination is now August 7, 2015.
Reimbursement of Duties This notice is issued and published
Certain Polyethylene Terephthalate
This notice also serves as a final pursuant to section 703(c)(2) of the Act
Resin From the People’s Republic of
reminder to importers of their and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1).
China, India and the Sultanate of
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) Oman: Postponement of Preliminary Dated: May 7, 2015.
to file a certificate regarding the Determinations in the Countervailing Ronald K Lorentzen,
reimbursement of antidumping duties Duty Investigations Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
prior to liquidation of the relevant and Compliance.
entries during this POR. Failure to AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, [FR Doc. 2015–11654 Filed 5–13–15; 8:45 am]
comply with this requirement could International Trade Administration,
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
result in the Department’s presumption Department of Commerce.
that reimbursement of antidumping FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
duties has occurred and the subsequent David Cordell (India) at (202) 482–0408, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
assessment of doubled antidumping Ilissa Shefferman (People’s Republic of
duties. China) at (202) 482–4684, and Thomas National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Martin (Sultanate of Oman) at (202) Administration
Administrative Protective Order
482–3935, AD/CVD Operations, RIN 0648–XD773
This notice also serves as a reminder Enforcement and Compliance,
to parties subject to administrative International Trade Administration, Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to
protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their Department of Commerce, 14th Street Specified Activities; Marine
responsibility concerning the return or and Constitution Avenue NW., Geophysical Survey in the Northwest
destruction of proprietary information Washington, DC 20230. Atlantic Ocean Offshore New Jersey,
disclosed under APO in accordance SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: June to August, 2015
with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
to govern business proprietary Background AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
information in this segment of the On March 30, 2015, the Department of Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
proceeding. Timely written notification Commerce (the Department) initiated Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
of the return/destruction of APO countervailing duty investigations on Commerce.
materials or conversion to judicial certain polyethylene terephthalate resin ACTION: Notice; issuance of an incidental
protective order is hereby requested. from the People’s Republic of China harassment authorization.
Failure to comply with the regulations (PRC), India, and the Sultanate of Oman
and terms of an APO is a violation SUMMARY: In accordance with the
(Oman).1 Currently, the preliminary Marine Mammal Protection Act
which is subject to sanction. determinations are due no later than
We are issuing and publishing this (MMPA) implementing regulations, we
June 3, 2015. hereby give notice that we have issued
administrative review and notice in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and Postponement of the Preliminary an Incidental Harassment Authorization
777(i) of the Act. Determination (Authorization) to Lamont-Doherty
Earth Observatory (Lamont-Doherty), a
Dated: May 7, 2015. Section 703(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of
component of Columbia University, in
Paul Piquado, 1930, as amended (the Act), requires the
collaboration with the National Science
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Department to issue the preliminary
Foundation (NSF), to take marine
Compliance. determination in a countervailing duty
mammals, by harassment, incidental to
investigation within 65 days after the
Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in conducting a marine geophysical
date on which the Department initiated
the Decision Memorandum (seismic) survey in the northwest
the investigation. However, if the
Atlantic Ocean off the New Jersey coast
I. Summary petitioner makes a timely request for an
June through August, 2015.
II. Background extension in accordance with 19 CFR
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1. Scope of the Order 351.205(e), section 703(c)(1)(A) of the 2 DAK Americas, LLC, M&G Chemicals, and Nan
2. Case Timeline Act allows the Department to postpone Ya Plastics Corporation, America, (the petitioners).
III. Discussion of the Issues 3 See Letters from Petitioners, entitled
Comment 1: Whether the Department’s 1 See Certain Polyethylene Terephthalate Resin ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate Resin From the
Rejection of Kunshan Xinlong’s Post- from the People’s Republic of China, India, and the People’s Republic of China, India and Sultanate of
Deadline Extension Requests Was Sultanate of Oman: Initiation of Countervailing Oman: Petitioners’ Request for Extension of the
Appropriate Duty Investigations, 80 FR 18376 (April 6, 2015). Preliminary Determination,’’ dated May 4, 2015.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:59 May 13, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14MYN1.SGM 14MYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_27726/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-15 15:32:54
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 15:32:54
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Contact | Irene Gorelik, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6905. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 27633 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR