80 FR 30005 - Safety Zone, Swim Around Charleston; Charleston, SC

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 100 (May 26, 2015)

Page Range		30005-30008
FR Document		2015-12634

The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary moving safety zone during the Swim Around Charleston, a swimming race occurring on the Wando River, the Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, and the Ashley River, in Charleston, South Carolina. The Swim Around Charleston is scheduled on Saturday, September 26, 2015. The temporary moving safety zone is necessary to protect swimmers, participant vessels, spectators, and the general public during the event. Persons and vessels would be prohibited from entering the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated representative.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 100 (Tuesday, May 26, 2015)

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 26, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 30005-30008]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-12634]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2015-0276]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone, Swim Around Charleston; Charleston, SC

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary moving 
safety zone during the Swim Around Charleston, a swimming race 
occurring on the Wando River, the Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, and 
the Ashley River, in Charleston, South Carolina. The Swim Around 
Charleston is scheduled on Saturday, September 26, 2015. The temporary 
moving safety zone is necessary to protect swimmers, participant 
vessels, spectators, and the general public during the event. Persons 
and vessels would be prohibited from entering the safety zone unless 
authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated 
representative.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast 
Guard on or before June 25, 2015. Requests for public meetings must be 
received by the Coast Guard on or before August 1, 2015.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number using 
any one of the following methods:
    (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
    (3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. 
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries 
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 
federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329.

See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of 
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions on 
submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of these 
three methods.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email Chief Warrant Officer Christopher Ruleman, Sector 
Charleston Office of Waterways Management, Coast Guard; telephone 
(843)-740-3184, email Christopher.L.Ruleman@uscg.mil. If you have 
questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl 
Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Acronyms

DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking

A. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting 
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted 
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any 
personal information you have provided.

1. Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this 
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which 
each comment applies, and provide a reason

[[Page 30006]]

for each suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and 
material online at http://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand 
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a 
comment online, it will be considered received by the Coast Guard when 
you successfully transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or 
mail your comment, it will be considered as having been received by the 
Coast Guard when it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We 
recommend that you include your name and a mailing address, an email 
address, or a telephone number in the body of your document so that we 
can contact you if we have questions regarding your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov, 
type the docket number USCG-2015-0276 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click 
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with 
this rulemaking.
    If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them 
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for 
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would 
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped, 
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and 
material received during the comment period and may change the rule 
based on your comments.

2. Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble 
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, 
type the docket number USCG-2015-0276 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click 
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with 
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in 
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation 
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, 
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal 
holidays.

3. Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any 
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or 
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, 
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice 
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the 
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

4. Public Meeting

    We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a 
request for one, using one of the methods specified under ADDRESSES. 
Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be beneficial. If 
we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a 
time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.

B. Basis and Purpose

    The legal basis for the proposed rule is the Coast Guard's 
authority to establish regulated navigation areas and other limited 
access areas: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), and 160.5; 
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
    The purpose of the proposed rule is to ensure the safety of the 
swimmers, participant vessels, spectators, and the general public 
during the Swim Around Charleston.

C. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    On Saturday, September 26, 2015, the Swim Around Charleston is 
scheduled to take place on the Wando River, the Cooper River, 
Charleston Harbor, and the Ashley River, in Charleston, South Carolina. 
The Swim Around Charleston will consist of a 12 mile swim that starts 
at Remley's Point on the Wando River, crosses the main shipping channel 
of Charleston Harbor, and finishes at the I-526 bridge and boat landing 
on the Ashley River.
    The proposed rule would establish a temporary moving safety zone of 
50 yards in front of the lead safety vessel preceding the first race 
participant, 50 yards behind the safety vessel trailing the last race 
participants, and at all times extend 100 yards on either side of 
safety vessels. The temporary moving safety zone would be enforced from 
12:00 p.m. until 6:00 p.m. on September 26, 2015.
    Persons and vessels would be prohibited from entering or transiting 
through the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port 
Charleston or a designated representative. Persons and vessels would be 
able to request authorization to enter or transit through the safety 
zone by contacting the Captain of the Port Charleston by telephone at 
(843) 740-7050, or a designated representative via VHF radio on channel 
16.

D. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes 
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our 
analyses based on a number of these statutes or executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under 
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, 
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and 
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential 
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or 
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and 
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders.
    The economic impact of this proposed rule is not significant for 
the following reasons: (1) The safety zone would only be enforced for a 
total of six hours; (2) the safety zone would move with the participant 
vessels so that once the swimmers clear a portion of the waterway, the 
safety zone would no longer be enforced in that portion of the 
waterway; (3) although persons and vessels would not be able to enter 
or transit through the safety zone without authorization from the 
Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated representative, they 
would be able to operate in the surrounding area during the enforcement 
period; (4) persons and vessels would still be able to enter or transit 
through the safety zone if authorized by the Captain of the Port 
Charleston or a designated representative; and (5) the Coast Guard 
would provide advance notification of the safety zone to the local 
maritime community by Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice to 
Mariners.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this 
proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities.
    This proposed rule may affect the following entities, some of which 
may be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels intending to 
enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within that portion of the 
Wando River, the Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, and the Ashley River 
in Charleston, South Carolina encompassed within the

[[Page 30007]]

safety zone from 12:00 p.m. until 6:00 p.m. on Saturday, September 26, 
2015. For the reasons discussed in the Regulatory Planning and Review 
section above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. If you think that 
your business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction qualifies as 
a small entity and that this rule would have a significant economic 
impact on it, please submit a comment (see ADDRESSES) explaining why 
you think it qualifies and how and to what degree this rule would 
economically affect it.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect 
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you 
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any 
policy or action of the Coast Guard.

4. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule will not call for a new collection of 
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520.).

5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and 
determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism.

6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the ``For Further 
Information Contact'' section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not 
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule 
elsewhere in this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

    This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or 
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, 
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected 
Property Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize 
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045, 
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety 
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not 
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might 
disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under 
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian tribal 
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

    This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under 
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

13. Technical Standards

    This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we 
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded 
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or 
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This 
rule involves a special local regulation issued in conjunction with a 
regatta or marine parade. This rule is categorically excluded from 
further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant 
Instruction. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the 
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes 
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.

0
2. Add a temporary Sec.  165.T07-0276 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T07-0276  Safety Zone; Swim Around Charleston, Charleston, 
SC.

    (a) Regulated areas. The following regulated area is a moving 
safety zone: all waters 50 yards in front of the lead safety vessel 
preceding the first race participants, 50 yards behind the safety 
vessel trailing the last race participants, and at all times extend 100 
yards on either side of safety vessels. The Swim Around Charleston 
swimming race consists of a 12 mile course that starts at Remley's 
Point on the Wando River in approximate position 32[deg]48'49'' N., 
79[deg]54'27'' W., crosses the main shipping channel under the main 
span of the Ravenel Bridge, and finishes at the I-526 bridge and boat 
landing on the Ashley River in approximate position 32[deg]50'14'' N., 
80[deg]01'23'' W. All coordinates are North American Datum 1983.
    (b) Definition. The term ``designated representative'' means Coast 
Guard

[[Page 30008]]

Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty officers, and 
other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and Federal, state, and 
local officers designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port 
Charleston in the enforcement of the regulated areas.
    (c) Regulations. (1) All persons and vessels are prohibited from 
entering or transiting through the regulated areas unless authorized by 
the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated representative.
    (2) Persons and vessels desiring to enter or transit through the 
regulated areas may contact the Captain of the Port Charleston by 
telephone at (843) 740-7050, or a designated representative via VHF 
radio on channel 16, to request authorization. If authorization to 
enter or transit through the regulated areas is granted by the Captain 
of the Port Charleston or a designated representative, all persons and 
vessels receiving such authorization must comply with the instructions 
of the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated representative.
    (3) The Coast Guard will provide notice of the regulated areas by 
Local Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and on-scene 
designated representatives.
    (d) Effective date. This rule is effective on Saturday, September 
26, 2015, and will be enforced from 12:00 p.m. until 6:00 p.m.

    Dated: May 1, 2015.
G.L. Tomasulo,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Charleston.
[FR Doc. 2015-12634 Filed 5-22-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 100 / Tuesday, May 26, 2015 / Proposed Rules 30007

safety zone from 12:00 p.m. until 6:00 Federal agencies to assess the effects of 14. Environment
p.m. on Saturday, September 26, 2015. their discretionary regulatory actions. In We have analyzed this rule under
For the reasons discussed in the particular, the Act addresses actions Department of Homeland Security
Regulatory Planning and Review section that may result in the expenditure by a Management Directive 023–01 and
above, this proposed rule would not State, local, or tribal government, in the Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
have a significant economic impact on aggregate, or by the private sector of which guide the Coast Guard in
a substantial number of small entities. If $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or complying with the National
you think that your business, more in any one year. Though this Environmental Policy Act of 1969
organization, or governmental proposed rule would not result in such (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity an expenditure, we do discuss the have concluded this action is one of a
and that this rule would have a effects of this rule elsewhere in this category of actions that do not
significant economic impact on it, preamble. individually or cumulatively have a
please submit a comment (see significant effect on the human
8. Taking of Private Property
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it environment. This rule involves a
qualifies and how and to what degree This proposed rule would not cause a special local regulation issued in
this rule would economically affect it. taking of private property or otherwise conjunction with a regatta or marine
have taking implications under parade. This rule is categorically
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Executive Order 12630, Governmental excluded from further review under
Under section 213(a) of the Small Actions and Interference with paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the
Business Regulatory Enforcement Constitutionally Protected Property Commandant Instruction. We seek any
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), Rights. comments or information that may lead
we want to assist small entities in to the discovery of a significant
understanding this proposed rule. If the 9. Civil Justice Reform
environmental impact from this rule.
rule would affect your small business, This proposed rule meets applicable
organization, or governmental List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
jurisdiction and you have questions Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
concerning its provisions or options for Reform, to minimize litigation, (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
compliance, please contact the person eliminate ambiguity, and reduce requirements, Security measures,
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION burden. Waterways.
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will For the reasons discussed in the
not retaliate against small entities that 10. Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
question or complain about this amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
proposed rule or any policy or action of We have analyzed this proposed rule
the Coast Guard. under Executive Order 13045, PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
4. Collection of Information Protection of Children from AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
This proposed rule will not call for a ■ 1. The authority citation for part 165
Risks. This rule is not an economically
new collection of information under the continues to read as follows:
significant rule and would not create an
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 environmental risk to health or risk to Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
U.S.C. 3501–3520.). safety that might disproportionately 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
5. Federalism affect children.
No. 0170.1.
A rule has implications for federalism 11. Indian Tribal Governments ■ 2. Add a temporary § 165.T07–0276 to
under Executive Order 13132, read as follows:
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct This proposed rule does not have
effect on the States, on the relationship tribal implications under Executive § 165.T07–0276 Safety Zone; Swim Around
between the national government and Order 13175, Consultation and Charleston, Charleston, SC.
the States, or on the distribution of Coordination with Indian tribal (a) Regulated areas. The following
power and responsibilities among the Governments, because it would not have regulated area is a moving safety zone:
various levels of government. We have a substantial direct effect on one or all waters 50 yards in front of the lead
analyzed this proposed rule under that more Indian tribes, on the relationship safety vessel preceding the first race
Order and determined that this rule between the Federal Government and participants, 50 yards behind the safety
does not have implications for Indian tribes, or on the distribution of vessel trailing the last race participants,
federalism. power and responsibilities between the and at all times extend 100 yards on
Federal Government and Indian tribes. either side of safety vessels. The Swim
6. Protest Activities Around Charleston swimming race
12. Energy Effects
The Coast Guard respects the First consists of a 12 mile course that starts
Amendment rights of protesters. This proposed rule is not a at Remley’s Point on the Wando River
Protesters are asked to contact the ‘‘significant energy action’’ under in approximate position 32°48′49″ N.,
person listed in the ‘‘For Further Executive Order 13211, Actions 79°54′27″ W., crosses the main shipping
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

Information Contact’’ section to Concerning Regulations That channel under the main span of the
coordinate protest activities so that your Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Ravenel Bridge, and finishes at the I–
message can be received without Distribution, or Use. 526 bridge and boat landing on the
jeopardizing the safety or security of 13. Technical Standards Ashley River in approximate position
people, places or vessels. 32°50′14″ N., 80°01′23″ W. All
This proposed rule does not use coordinates are North American Datum
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act technical standards. Therefore, we did 1983.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act not consider the use of voluntary (b) Definition. The term ‘‘designated
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires consensus standards. representative’’ means Coast Guard

VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:06 May 22, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\26MYP1.SGM 26MYP1

Document Created: 2018-02-21 10:31:35
Document Modified: 2018-02-21 10:31:35

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Dates		Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before June 25, 2015. Requests for public meetings must be received by the Coast Guard on or before August 1, 2015.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, call or email Chief Warrant Officer Christopher Ruleman, Sector Charleston Office of Waterways Management, Coast Guard; telephone (843)-740-3184, email [email protected] If you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
FR Citation		80 FR 30005
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

80 FR 30005 - Safety Zone, Swim Around Charleston; Charleston, SC

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 100 (May 26, 2015)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard