80 FR 32090 - Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products From Turkey: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 108 (June 5, 2015)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 108 (June 5, 2015)
| Page Range | 32090-32092 | |
| FR Document | 2015-13807 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 108 (Friday, June 5, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 32090-32092] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-13807] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-489-501] Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products From Turkey: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013- 2014 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: In response to a request by interested parties,\1\ the Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on welded carbon steel standard pipe and tube products (welded pipe and tube) from Turkey.\2\ The period of review (POR) is May 1, 2013, to April 30, 2014. This review covers the following companies: Borusan Istikbal Ticaret T.A.S., and Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (collectively ``Borusan''); ERBOSAN Erciyas Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (Erbosan); Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S. (Toscelik) and Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S. (Tosyali) (collectively ``Toscelik'').\3\ The Department preliminarily determines that Borusan and Toscelik both made U.S. sales of subject merchandise below normal value. In addition, the Department preliminarily finds that Erbosan had no shipments. The preliminary results are listed below in the section titled ``Preliminary Results of Review.'' --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Wheatland Tube Company, Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S., and Borusan Istikbal Ticaret requested the instant administrative review. \2\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 79 FR 36462 (June 27, 2014) (Initiation Notice). The Initiation Notice inadvertently referenced the incorrect order title. This Federal Register notice and the decision memorandum accompanying these preliminary results use the original and correct order title, as reflected in the original 1986 order. See Antidumping Duty Order; Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products from Turkey, 51 FR 17784 (May 15, 1986). \3\ In prior segments of this proceeding, we treated Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. and Borusan Istikbal Ticaret T.A.S. as the same legal entity. See, e.g., Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products From Turkey: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR 71087, 71088 (December 1, 2014). We preliminarily determine that there is no evidence on the record for altering such treatment of these two parties, referred to collectively as Borusan. Similarly, in prior segments of this proceeding we treated Toscelik and Tosyali as the same legal entity. See, e.g., id. There is also no record evidence for altering this treatment. Therefore, for these preliminary results, we are treating Toscelik and Tosyali as the same legal entity. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATES: Effective Date: June 5, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred Baker, Deborah Scott, or Robert James at (202) 482-2924, (202) 482-2657, or (202) 482-0649, respectively; AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order is welded pipe and tube. The welded pipe and tube subject to the order is currently classifiable under subheading 7306.30.10.00, 7306.30.50.25, 7306.30.50.32, 7306.30.50.40, 7306.30.50.55, 7306.30.50.85, and 7306.30.50.90 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). The HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes. A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products from Turkey; 2013-2014 Administrative Review'' (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), which is hereby adopted by this notice. The written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. Methodology The Department has conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) and (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Export price is calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Normal value (NV) is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The [[Page 32091]] Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. A list of the topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as the Appendix to this notice. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments On July 15, 2014, Erbosan submitted a letter certifying that it had no exports, sales, or entries of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR, and that it did not know or have reason to know that any of its customers would subsequently export or sell subject merchandise exported by Erbosan to the United States. On August 22, 2014, the Department issued a ``No Shipment Inquiry'' to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to confirm that there were no entries of welded pipe and tube from Turkey exported by Erbosan during the POR. In response, CBP communicated to the Department that its data indicated that subject merchandise exported by Erbosan may have entered the United States during the POR. Therefore, we obtained U.S. entry documents for these shipments, and upon analysis conclude that the record does not support finding that Erbosan had knowledge that the destination for these shipments was the United States.\4\ The Department also requested clarification from Erbosan regarding these shipments, and Erbosan again confirmed that during the POR, it did not export subject merchandise to any customer in the United States or to any customer outside the United States knowing the final destination was the United States. Erbosan also certified that it did not sell subject merchandise to any domestic customer which purchased the subject merchandise for export to the United States, nor did it have knowledge that any of its customers would subsequently export or sell Erbosan's subject merchandise to the United States. As previously noted, we have found nothing in the U.S. entry documents or elsewhere on the record that contradicts these claims. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Memorandum to the File from Fred Baker, ``U.S. Entry Documents--Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products from Turkey,'' dated January 30, 2015. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Based on Erbosan's certifications and our analysis of the other information on the record referenced above, we preliminarily determine that Erbosan had no shipments during the POR. However, consistent with our practice, the Department finds that it is not appropriate to rescind the review with respect to Erbosan, but rather to complete the review with respect to Erbosan, and to issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final results of this review. Preliminary Results of Review As a result of this review, we preliminarily determine that the weighted-average dumping margins for the period May 1, 2013 through April 30, 2014 are as follows: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- Average Producer or exporter dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S \5\........... 3.16 Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S \6\................... 1.77 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ \5\ Also includes Borusan Istikbal Ticaret T.A.S. See footnote 3. \6\ Also includes Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S. See footnote 3. Disclosure and Public Comment The Department will disclose to interested parties the calculations performed in connection with these preliminary results within five days of the date of publication of this notice.\7\ Interested parties may submit case briefs no later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.\8\ Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the due date for filing case briefs.\9\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\10\ Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed using ACCESS.\11\ In order to be properly filed, ACCESS must successfully receive an electronically-filed document in its entirety by 5 p.m. Eastern Time. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b). \8\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). \9\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d). \10\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). \11\ See 19 CFR 351.303. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing, or to participate if one is requested, must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via ACCESS, within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.\12\ Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case and rebuttal briefs. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unless otherwise extended, the Department intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of its analysis of the issues raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after the date of publication of this notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Assessment Rates Upon completion of the administrative review, the Department shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of the final results of this review. If Borusan's or Toscelik's weighted-average dumping margins are not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent) in the final results of this review, we will calculate importer-specific assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales and the total entered value of the sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where either a respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer- specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. With respect to Erbosan, if we continue to find that Erbosan had no shipments of subject merchandise in the final results, we will instruct CBP to liquidate any existing entries of merchandise produced by Erbosan, but exported by other parties, at the rate for the intermediate reseller, if available, or at the all-others rate.\13\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ See, e.g., Magnesium Metal From the Russian Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 26922, 26923 (May 13, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal From the Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 56989 (September 17, 2010). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 32092]] Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Borusan and Toscelik will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of this review, except if the rate is zero or de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for other manufacturers and exporters covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which that manufacturer or exporter participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original less- than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but the manufacturer is, then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 14.74 percent, the all-others rate established in the LTFV investigation.\14\ These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ See Antidumping Duty Order; Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products From Turkey, 51 FR 17784 (May 15, 1986). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: May 29, 2015. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 1. Summary 2. Background 3. Scope of the Order 4. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments 5. Comparisons to Normal Value 6. Product Comparisons 7. Date of Sale 8. Export Price 9. Normal Value 10. Currency Conversion 11. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2015-13807 Filed 6-4-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![32090 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 108 / Friday, June 5, 2015 / Notices
516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as Notification to Interested Parties Department preliminarily determines
amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department This notice is issued and published in that Borusan and Toscelik both made
must publish a notice of a court accordance with sections 516A(e), U.S. sales of subject merchandise below
decision that is not ‘‘in harmony’’ with 751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act. normal value. In addition, the
a Department determination and must Department preliminarily finds that
Dated: May 29, 2015. Erbosan had no shipments. The
suspend liquidation of entries pending
Paul Piquado, preliminary results are listed below in
a ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The
Court’s judgment in TMI II sustaining Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and the section titled ‘‘Preliminary Results
Compliance. of Review.’’
the Final Remand Results constitutes a
[FR Doc. 2015–13828 Filed 6–4–15; 8:45 am] DATES: Effective Date: June 5, 2015.
final decision of the Court that is not in
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred
harmony with the Department’s Final
Results. This notice is published in Baker, Deborah Scott, or Robert James at
fulfillment of the publication (202) 482–2924, (202) 482–2657, or
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE (202) 482–0649, respectively; AD/CVD
requirement of Timken.
International Trade Administration Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and
Amended Final Results Compliance, International Trade
[A–489–501] Administration, U.S. Department of
Because there is now a final court
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
decision, the Department is amending Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.
the Final Results with respect to the and Tube Products From Turkey:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
surrogate value for truck freight and Preliminary Results of Antidumping
financial ratios, in addition to correcting Duty Administrative Review; 2013– Scope of the Order
the errors in its calculation of the labor 2014 The merchandise subject to the order
rate. The revised weighted-average is welded pipe and tube. The welded
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
dumping margin for TMI during the International Trade Administration, pipe and tube subject to the order is
period May 1, 2009, through April 30, U.S. Department of Commerce. currently classifiable under subheading
2010, is as follows: 7306.30.10.00, 7306.30.50.25,
SUMMARY: In response to a request by
interested parties,1 the Department of 7306.30.50.32, 7306.30.50.40,
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE DUMPING Commerce (the Department) is 7306.30.50.55, 7306.30.50.85, and
MARGIN: conducting an administrative review of 7306.30.50.90 of the Harmonized Tariff
the antidumping duty order on welded Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Weighted- carbon steel standard pipe and tube The HTSUS subheading is provided for
average convenience and customs purposes. A
Exporter dumping products (welded pipe and tube) from
margin Turkey.2 The period of review (POR) is full description of the scope of the order
(percent) May 1, 2013, to April 30, 2014. This is contained in the memorandum from
review covers the following companies: Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
TMI .............................................. 51.26 Borusan Istikbal Ticaret T.A.S., and Secretary for Antidumping and
Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul
Accordingly, the Department will Ticaret A.S. (collectively ‘‘Borusan’’); Piquado, Assistant Secretary for
continue the suspension of liquidation ERBOSAN Erciyas Boru Sanayi ve Enforcement and Compliance,
of the subject merchandise pending the Ticaret A.S. (Erbosan); Toscelik Profil ve ‘‘Decision Memorandum for Preliminary
expiration of the period of appeal or, if Sac Endustrisi A.S. (Toscelik) and Results of Antidumping Duty
appealed, pending a final and Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S. (Tosyali) Administrative Review: Welded Carbon
conclusive court decision. In the event (collectively ‘‘Toscelik’’).3 The Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products
from Turkey; 2013–2014 Administrative
the Court’s ruling is not appealed or, if
1 Wheatland Tube Company, Borusan Review’’ (Preliminary Decision
appealed, upheld by the CAFC, the
Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S., and Memorandum), which is hereby
Department will instruct U.S. Customs Borusan Istikbal Ticaret requested the instant adopted by this notice. The written
and Border Protection to assess administrative review. description of the scope of the order is
antidumping duties on unliquidated 2 See Initiation of Antidumping and
dispositive.
entries of subject merchandise exported Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 79 FR
36462 (June 27, 2014) (Initiation Notice). The Methodology
by the above listed exporter at the rate Initiation Notice inadvertently referenced the
listed above. incorrect order title. This Federal Register notice The Department has conducted this
and the decision memorandum accompanying these review in accordance with section
Cash Deposit Requirements preliminary results use the original and correct
order title, as reflected in the original 1986 order.
751(a)(1)(B) and (2) of the Tariff Act of
Since the Final Remand Results, the See Antidumping Duty Order; Welded Carbon Steel 1930, as amended (the Act). Export
Department has established a new cash Standard Pipe and Tube Products from Turkey, 51 price is calculated in accordance with
FR 17784 (May 15, 1986). section 772 of the Act. Normal value
deposit rate for TMI.13 Therefore, the 3 In prior segments of this proceeding, we treated
cash deposit rate for TMI does not need (NV) is calculated in accordance with
Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.
to be updated as a result of these section 773 of the Act.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
and Borusan Istikbal Ticaret T.A.S. as the same
amended final results. legal entity. See, e.g., Welded Carbon Steel For a full description of the
Standard Pipe and Tube Products From Turkey: methodology underlying our
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative conclusions, see the Preliminary
13 See Pure Magnesium From the People’s Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 71087, 71088 (December
Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping 1, 2014). We preliminarily determine that there is Decision Memorandum. The
Duty Administrative Review; 2011–2012, 79 FR 94 no evidence on the record for altering such
(January 2, 2014); Pure Magnesium From the treatment of these two parties, referred to no record evidence for altering this treatment.
People’s Republic of China: Final Results of collectively as Borusan. Similarly, in prior segments Therefore, for these preliminary results, we are
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013– of this proceeding we treated Toscelik and Tosyali treating Toscelik and Tosyali as the same legal
2014, 80 FR 26541 (May 8, 2015). as the same legal entity. See, e.g., id. There is also entity.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:31 Jun 04, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05JNN1.SGM 05JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_32198/page/1.svg)
![32092 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 108 / Friday, June 5, 2015 / Notices
Cash Deposit Requirements Dated: May 29, 2015. 30, 2014.1 On December 15, 2014, the
Paul Piquado, Department extended the deadline for
The following cash deposit Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and the preliminary results to June 3, 2015.2
requirements will be effective for all Compliance.
shipments of the subject merchandise Scope of the Order
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum The merchandise covered by this
for consumption on or after the order is all grades of garlic, whether
publication date of the final results of 1. Summary whole or separated into constituent
this administrative review, as provided 2. Background cloves.3 The subject merchandise is
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 3. Scope of the Order currently classifiable under the
The cash deposit rate for Borusan and 4. Preliminary Determination of No Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
Toscelik will be equal to the weighted- Shipments United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) subheadings:
average dumping margin established in 5. Comparisons to Normal Value
6. Product Comparisons
0703.20.0000, 0703.20.0005,
the final results of this review, except if 7. Date of Sale 0703.20.0010, 0703.20.0015,
the rate is zero or de minimis within the 8. Export Price 0703.20.0020, 0703.20.0090,
meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in 9. Normal Value 0710.80.7060, 0710.80.9750,
which case the cash deposit rate will be 10. Currency Conversion 0711.90.6000, 0711.90.6500,
zero; (2) for other manufacturers and 11. Recommendation 2005.90.9500, 2005.90.9700, and
exporters covered in a prior segment of [FR Doc. 2015–13807 Filed 6–4–15; 8:45 am] 2005.99.9700. A full description of the
the proceeding, the cash deposit rate BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P scope of the order is contained in the
will continue to be the company- Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
specific rate published for the most Although the HTSUS subheadings are
recently completed segment of this DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE provided for convenience and customs
proceeding in which that manufacturer purposes, the written product
International Trade Administration description is dispositive.
or exporter participated; (3) if the
exporter is not a firm covered in this Methodology
review, a prior review, or the original [A–570–831]
less-than-fair-value (LTFV) The Department is conducting this
Fresh Garlic From the People’s review in accordance with section
investigation, but the manufacturer is, Republic of China: Preliminary Intent
then the cash deposit rate will be the 751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
To Rescind the New Shipper Review of amended (‘‘the Act’’), and 19 CFR
rate established for the most recently Jinxiang Kaihua Imp & Exp Co., Ltd.
completed segment of this proceeding 351.214. For a full description of the
for the manufacturer of subject methodology underlying our
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit conclusions, see the Preliminary
International Trade Administration,
rate for all other manufacturers or Decision Memorandum.
Department of Commerce.
exporters will continue to be 14.74 The Preliminary Decision
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce Memorandum is a public document and
percent, the all-others rate established (‘‘the Department’’) is conducting a new
in the LTFV investigation.14 These is on file electronically via Enforcement
shipper review of Jinxiang Kaihua Imp and Compliance’s centralized electronic
deposit requirements, when imposed, & Exp Co., Ltd. (Kaihua) regarding the
shall remain in effect until further service system (‘‘ACCESS’’). ACCESS is
antidumping duty order on fresh garlic available to registered users at http://
notice. from the People’s Republic of China access.trade.gov and in the
Notification to Importers (‘‘the PRC’’). The period of review Department’s Central Records Unit,
(‘‘POR’’) is November 1, 2013 through Room 7046 of the main Department of
This notice also serves as a April 30, 2014. The Department has Commerce building. In addition, a
preliminary reminder to importers of preliminarily determined that Kaihua’s complete version of the Preliminary
their responsibility under 19 CFR new shipper sale is not bona fide. Decision Memorandum can be accessed
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate Interested parties are invited to directly on the Internet at http://
regarding the reimbursement of comment on these preliminary results. enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.
antidumping duties prior to liquidation DATES: Effective Date: June 5, 2015. The signed Preliminary Decision
of the relevant entries during this Memorandum and the electronic
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
review period. Failure to comply with versions of the Preliminary Decision
Milton Koch, AD/CVD Operations,
this requirement could result in the Memorandum are identical in content.
Office VII, Enforcement and
Secretary’s presumption that
Compliance, International Trade
reimbursement of antidumping duties 1 See Fresh Garlic from the People’s Republic of
Administration, U.S. Department of China: Initiation of Antidumping Duty New Shipper
occurred and the subsequent assessment Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Review; 2013–2014, 79 FR 46250 (August 7, 2014).
of double antidumping duties. Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 2 See the Department Memorandum ‘‘Fresh Garlic
We are issuing and publishing these telephone: (202) 482–2584. from the People’s Republic of China: Extension of
Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
results in accordance with sections
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Duty New Shipper Review,’’ dated December 12,
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 2014.
Background 3 See the Department Memorandum, ‘‘Decision
Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the
On August 7, 2014, the Department Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review of Fresh
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR
published notice of initiation of a new Garlic from the People’s Republic of China: Jinxiang
56989 (September 17, 2010). Kaihua Imp & Exp Co., Ltd.’’ dated concurrently
14 See Antidumping Duty Order; Welded Carbon
shipper review of fresh garlic from the
with and hereby adopted by this notice
Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products From People’s Republic of China for the (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), for a
Turkey, 51 FR 17784 (May 15, 1986). period November 1, 2013 through April complete description of the Scope of the Order.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:31 Jun 04, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05JNN1.SGM 05JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_32198/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-15 15:20:41
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 15:20:41
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Contact | Fred Baker, Deborah Scott, or Robert James at (202) 482-2924, (202) 482-2657, or (202) 482-0649, respectively; AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 32090 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR