80_FR_32451 80 FR 32342 - Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From Canada: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014

80 FR 32342 - Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From Canada: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 109 (June 8, 2015)

Page Range32342-32343
FR Document2015-13970

The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on citric acid and certain citrate salts (citric acid) from Canada.\1\ The period of review (POR) is May 1, 2013, through April 30, 2014. The review covers one producer/exporter of the subject merchandise, Jungbunzlauer Canada Inc. (JBL Canada). We preliminarily determine that sales of subject merchandise by JBL Canada have not been made at prices below normal value (NV). We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 109 (Monday, June 8, 2015) 
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 109 (Monday, June 8, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32342-32343]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-13970]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-122-853]


Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From Canada: Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an 
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on citric acid and 
certain citrate salts (citric acid) from Canada.\1\ The period of 
review (POR) is May 1, 2013, through April 30, 2014. The review covers 
one producer/exporter of the subject merchandise, Jungbunzlauer Canada 
Inc. (JBL Canada). We preliminarily determine that sales of subject 
merchandise by JBL Canada have not been made at prices below normal 
value (NV). We invite interested parties to comment on these 
preliminary results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews, 79 FR 36462 (June 27, 2014) (Initiation 
Notice).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: June 8, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca Trainor or Katherine Johnson, 
AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-4007 
or (202) 482-4929, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by this order is citric acid and certain 
citrate salts from Canada. The product is currently classified under 
subheadings 2918.14.0000, 2918.15.1000, 2918.15.5000, and 3824.90.9290 
of the Harmonized Tariff System of the United States (HTSUS). Although 
the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs 
purposes, the written description of merchandise subject to the scope 
is dispositive.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ A full description of the scope of the order is contained in 
the memorandum to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary 
for Enforcement and Compliance, from Christian Marsh, Deputy 
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations, ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Citric Acid and Certain 
Citrate Salts from Canada'' (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), dated 
concurrently with these results and hereby adopted by this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Methodology

    The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section 
751(a)(1)(B) and (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 
Constructed export price is calculated in accordance with section 772 
of the Act. NV is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. 
For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, 
see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by 
this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document 
and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service 
System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov, and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room 
7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a 
complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed 
at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum and the electronic version of the Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum are identical in content. A list of the topics discussed in 
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as an Appendix to this 
notice.

Preliminary Results of the Review

    As a result of this review, the Department preliminarily determines 
that a weighted-average dumping margin of 0.00 percent exists for JBL 
Canada for the period May 1, 2013, through April 30, 2014.

Disclosure and Public Comment

    We intend to disclose to interested parties the calculations 
performed in connection with these preliminary results within five days 
of the date of

[[Page 32343]]

publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
    Interested parties may submit case briefs not later than 30 days 
after the date of publication of this notice.\3\ Rebuttal briefs, 
limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later 
than five days after the date for filing case briefs.\4\ Pursuant to 19 
CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), parties who submit case briefs or 
rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each 
argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the 
argument; and (3) a table of authorities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c).
    \4\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to 
request a hearing, or to participate if one is requested, must submit a 
written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 
Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, filed electronically via 
ACCESS. An electronically filed document must be received successfully 
in its entirety by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, within 30 
days after the date of publication of this notice.\5\ Requests should 
contain: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the 
number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. If a 
request for a hearing is made, the Department intends to hold the 
hearing at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a time and date to be 
determined. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those 
raised in the respective case and rebuttal briefs. Parties should 
confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing two 
days before the scheduled date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department intends to issue the final results of this 
administrative review, including the results of its analysis of issues 
raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after the date of 
publication of this notice, unless the deadline is extended.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    Upon completion of the administrative review, the Department shall 
determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this 
review.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We calculated importer-specific ad valorem duty assessment rates 
based on the ratio of the total amount of antidumping duties calculated 
for the examined sales to the total entered value of the examined sales 
to that importer. We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on 
all appropriate entries covered by this review when the importer-
specific assessment rate calculated in the final results of this review 
is above de minimis. Where either the respondent's weighted-average 
dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or the importer-specific 
assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to 
liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping 
duties.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 
Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 (February 14, 
2012); see also 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on 
May 6, 2003. This clarification will apply to entries of subject 
merchandise during the POR produced by JBL Canada for which it did not 
know its merchandise was destined for the United States. In such 
instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the 
all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) 
involved in the transaction.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ For a full discussion of this clarification, see Antidumping 
and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping 
Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We intend to issue instructions to CBP 41 days after the date of 
publication of the final results of this review.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the 
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for JBL Canada will 
be the rate established in the final results of this review, except if 
the rate is de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1) 
(i.e., less than 0.50 percent), in which case the cash deposit rate 
will be zero; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not 
participating in this review, the cash deposit rate will continue to be 
the company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if 
the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or 
the original investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit 
rate will be the rate established for the most recent period for the 
manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all 
other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 23.21 percent, the 
all-others rate established in the less-than-fair-value 
investigation.\10\ These requirements, when imposed, shall remain in 
effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Canada and 
the People's Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Orders, 74 FR 25703 
(May 29, 2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of 
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.
    We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4).

    Dated: June 1, 2015.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Methodology
    A. Fair Value Comparisons
    1. Determination of Comparison Method
    2. Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis
    B. Product Comparisons
    C. Constructed Export Price
    D. Normal Value
    1. Home Market Viability and Selection of Comparison Market
    2. Level of Trade (LOT)
    E. Cost of Production (COP) Analysis
    1. Calculation of COP
    2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices
    3. Results of the COP Test
    F. Calculation of NV Based on Comparison Market Prices
    G. Duty Absorption
    H. Currency Conversion
V. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2015-13970 Filed 6-5-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

32342 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 109 / Monday, June 8, 2015 / Notices consumption on or after the publication B. Product Comparisons 2918.14.0000, 2918.15.1000, date of the final results of this C. Date of Sale 2918.15.5000, and 3824.90.9290 of the administrative review, as provided by D. Constructed Export Price Harmonized Tariff System of the United E. Normal Value section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS 1. Home Market Viability as Comparison cash deposit rate for Akzo Nobel will be Market subheadings are provided for that established in the final results of 2. Level of Trade convenience and customs purposes, the this administrative review (except, if the 3. Cost of Production written description of merchandise rate is zero or de minimis, no cash a. Calculation of Cost of Production subject to the scope is dispositive.2 deposit will be required); (2) for b. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices previously reviewed or investigated c. Results of the Cost of Production Test Methodology companies not listed above, the cash 4. Calculation of Normal Value Based on The Department is conducting this deposit rate will continue to be the Comparison Market Prices review in accordance with section company-specific rate published for the 6. Currency Conversion 7. Recommendation 751(a)(1)(B) and (2) of the Tariff Act of most recent period; (3) if the exporter is 1930, as amended (the Act). Constructed not a firm covered in this review, a prior [FR Doc. 2015–13952 Filed 6–5–15; 8:45 am] export price is calculated in accordance review, or in the less-than-fair-value BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P with section 772 of the Act. NV is investigation but the manufacturer is, calculated in accordance with section the cash deposit rate will be the rate 773 of the Act. For a full description of established for the most recent period DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE the methodology underlying our for the manufacturer of the conclusions, see the Preliminary International Trade Administration merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit Decision Memorandum, which is hereby rate for all other manufacturers or [A–122–853] adopted by this notice. The Preliminary exporters will continue to be the all- Decision Memorandum is a public others rate of 14.57 percent, which is Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts document and is on file electronically the all-others rate established in the From Canada: Preliminary Results of via Enforcement and Compliance’s investigation.15 These cash deposit Antidumping Duty Administrative Antidumping and Countervailing Duty requirements, when imposed, shall Review; 2013–2014 Centralized Electronic Service System remain in effect until further notice. AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to Notification to Importers International Trade Administration, registered users at http:// Department of Commerce. access.trade.gov, and to all parties in the This notice also serves as a reminder Central Records Unit, Room 7046 of the SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce to importers of their responsibility main Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a building. In addition, a complete administrative review of the certificate regarding the reimbursement version of the Preliminary Decision antidumping duty order on citric acid of antidumping duties prior to Memorandum can be accessed at and certain citrate salts (citric acid) from liquidation of the relevant entries http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The Canada.1 The period of review (POR) is during this review period. Failure to signed Preliminary Decision May 1, 2013, through April 30, 2014. comply with this requirement could Memorandum and the electronic The review covers one producer/ result in the Department’s presumption version of the Preliminary Decision exporter of the subject merchandise, that reimbursement of antidumping Memorandum are identical in content. Jungbunzlauer Canada Inc. (JBL duties occurred and the subsequent A list of the topics discussed in the Canada). We preliminarily determine assessment of double antidumping Preliminary Decision Memorandum is that sales of subject merchandise by JBL duties. attached as an Appendix to this notice. We are issuing and publishing this Canada have not been made at prices notice in accordance with sections below normal value (NV). We invite Preliminary Results of the Review 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. As a result of this review, the CFR 351.213(h)(1). DATES: Effective Date: June 8, 2015. Department preliminarily determines Dated: May 29, 2015. that a weighted-average dumping FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ronald K. Lorentzen, margin of 0.00 percent exists for JBL Rebecca Trainor or Katherine Johnson, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement Canada for the period May 1, 2013, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, and Compliance. through April 30, 2014. Enforcement and Compliance, Appendix I International Trade Administration, Disclosure and Public Comment List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., We intend to disclose to interested Decision Memorandum Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) parties the calculations performed in 1. Summary connection with these preliminary 2. Background 482–4007 or (202) 482–4929, 3. Affiliation and Treatment as a Single respectively. results within five days of the date of Entity SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 4. Scope of the Order 2 A full description of the scope of the order is 5. Discussion of the Methodology Scope of the Order contained in the memorandum to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES A. Comparisons to Normal Value 1. Determination of Comparison Method The merchandise covered by this Enforcement and Compliance, from Christian 2. Results of the Differential Pricing order is citric acid and certain citrate Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping salts from Canada. The product is and Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Decision Analysis Memorandum for Preliminary Results of currently classified under subheadings Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Citric 15 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Canada’’ Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland, 1 See Initiation of Antidumping and (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), dated Mexico, the Netherlands and Sweden, 70 FR 39734, Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 79 FR concurrently with these results and hereby adopted 39735 (July 11, 2005). 36462 (June 27, 2014) (Initiation Notice). by this notice. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:09 Jun 05, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM 08JNN1

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 109 / Monday, June 8, 2015 / Notices 32343 publication of this notice in accordance the ratio of the total amount of of the merchandise; and (4) the cash with 19 CFR 351.224(b). antidumping duties calculated for the deposit rate for all other manufacturers Interested parties may submit case examined sales to the total entered or exporters will continue to be 23.21 briefs not later than 30 days after the value of the examined sales to that percent, the all-others rate established date of publication of this notice.3 importer. We will instruct CBP to assess in the less-than-fair-value Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised antidumping duties on all appropriate investigation.10 These requirements, in the case briefs, may be filed not later entries covered by this review when the when imposed, shall remain in effect than five days after the date for filing importer-specific assessment rate until further notice. case briefs.4 Pursuant to 19 CFR calculated in the final results of this 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), parties who review is above de minimis. Where Notification to Importers submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in either the respondent’s weighted- this proceeding are encouraged to average dumping margin is zero or de This notice also serves as a submit with each argument: (1) A minimis, or the importer-specific preliminary reminder to importers of statement of the issue; (2) a brief assessment rate is zero or de minimis, their responsibility under 19 CFR summary of the argument; and (3) a we will instruct CBP to liquidate the 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate table of authorities. appropriate entries without regard to regarding the reimbursement of Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), antidumping duties.8 antidumping duties prior to liquidation interested parties who wish to request a The Department clarified its of the relevant entries during this hearing, or to participate if one is ‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on review period. Failure to comply with requested, must submit a written May 6, 2003. This clarification will this requirement could result in the request to the Assistant Secretary for apply to entries of subject merchandise Secretary’s presumption that Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. during the POR produced by JBL reimbursement of antidumping duties Department of Commerce, filed Canada for which it did not know its occurred and the subsequent assessment electronically via ACCESS. An merchandise was destined for the of double antidumping duties. electronically filed document must be United States. In such instances, we will We are issuing and publishing these received successfully in its entirety by instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed results in accordance with sections ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Standard entries at the all-others rate if there is no 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 Time, within 30 days after the date of rate for the intermediate company(ies) CFR 351.221(b)(4). publication of this notice.5 Requests involved in the transaction.9 should contain: (1) The party’s name, We intend to issue instructions to Dated: June 1, 2015. address, and telephone number; (2) the CBP 41 days after the date of Ronald K. Lorentzen, number of participants; and (3) a list of publication of the final results of this Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement issues to be discussed. If a request for review. and Compliance. a hearing is made, the Department Cash Deposit Requirements intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in Department of Commerce, 14th Street The following deposit requirements the Preliminary Decision Memorandum and Constitution Avenue NW., will be effective for all shipments of the I. Summary Washington, DC 20230, at a time and subject merchandise entered, or II. Background date to be determined. Issues raised in withdrawn from warehouse, for III. Scope of the Order the hearing will be limited to those consumption on or after the publication IV. Discussion of the Methodology raised in the respective case and date of the final results of this A. Fair Value Comparisons rebuttal briefs. Parties should confirm administrative review, as provided by 1. Determination of Comparison Method by telephone the date, time, and section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The 2. Results of the Differential Pricing location of the hearing two days before cash deposit rate for JBL Canada will be Analysis the scheduled date. the rate established in the final results B. Product Comparisons The Department intends to issue the of this review, except if the rate is de C. Constructed Export Price final results of this administrative minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR D. Normal Value review, including the results of its 351.106(c)(1) (i.e., less than 0.50 1. Home Market Viability and Selection of analysis of issues raised in any written percent), in which case the cash deposit Comparison Market briefs, not later than 120 days after the rate will be zero; (2) for previously 2. Level of Trade (LOT) date of publication of this notice, unless reviewed or investigated companies not E. Cost of Production (COP) Analysis the deadline is extended.6 participating in this review, the cash 1. Calculation of COP deposit rate will continue to be the 2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices Assessment Rates company-specific rate published for the 3. Results of the COP Test Upon completion of the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is F. Calculation of NV Based on Comparison administrative review, the Department not a firm covered in this review, a prior Market Prices shall determine, and U.S. Customs and review, or the original investigation, but G. Duty Absorption Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, the manufacturer is, the cash deposit H. Currency Conversion antidumping duties on all appropriate rate will be the rate established for the V. Recommendation entries covered by this review.7 most recent period for the manufacturer [FR Doc. 2015–13970 Filed 6–5–15; 8:45 am] We calculated importer-specific ad mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 8 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P valorem duty assessment rates based on the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 3 See Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty 19 CFR 351.309(c). Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 4 See 19 CFR 351.309(d). (February 14, 2012); see also 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 5 See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 10 See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from 9 For a full discussion of this clarification, see 6 See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Canada and the People’s Republic of China: 351.213(h). Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 Antidumping Duty Orders, 74 FR 25703 (May 29, 7 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). (May 6, 2003). 2009). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:09 Jun 05, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM 08JNN1


Document Created: 2018-02-22 10:12:25
Document Modified: 2018-02-22 10:12:25
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
DatesEffective Date: June 8, 2015.
ContactRebecca Trainor or Katherine Johnson, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-4007 or (202) 482-4929, respectively.
FR Citation80 FR 32342 
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR