80 FR 32344 - Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 109 (June 8, 2015)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 109 (June 8, 2015)
| Page Range | 32344-32346 | |
| FR Document | 2015-13942 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 109 (Monday, June 8, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 32344-32346] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-13942] [[Page 32344]] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-900] Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012- 2013 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On December 4, 2014, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on diamond sawblades and parts thereof (diamond sawblades) from the People's Republic of China (the PRC). The period of review (POR) is November 1, 2012, through October 31, 2013. For the final results, we continue to find that certain companies covered by this review made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value. DATES: Effective Date: June 8, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Romani or Yang Jin Chun, AD/ CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 0198 or (202) 482-5760, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On December 4, 2014, the Department published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on diamond sawblades from the PRC.\1\ We received case and rebuttal briefs with respect to the Preliminary Results and, at the request of interested parties, held a hearing on April 15, 2015. We extended the due date for the final results of review to June 2, 2015.\2\ We conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR 71980 (December 4, 2014) (Preliminary Results), and the accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. \2\ See the memorandum to Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary Gary Taverman entitled ``Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of China: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review'' dated April 1, 2015, and the memorandum to Deputy Assistant Secretary Christian Marsh entitled ``Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of China: Second Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review'' dated May 5, 2015. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order is diamond sawblades. The diamond sawblades subject to the order are currently classifiable under subheadings 8202 to 8206 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), and may also enter under 6804.21.00. The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes. A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\3\ The written description is dispositive. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See the memorandum from Deputy Assistant Secretary Christian Marsh to Acting Assistant Secretary Ronald K. Lorentzen entitled ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of China'' dated June 2, 2015, (Issues and Decision Memorandum) and hereby adopted by this notice, at 4-5. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues raised is attached to this notice as an appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). Access to ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is also available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Enforcement and Compliance Web site at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. Final Determination of No Shipments We preliminarily found that Qingdao Shinhan Diamond Industrial Co., Ltd. (Qingdao Shinhan), which has been eligible for a separate rate in previous segments of the proceeding and is subject to this review, did not have any reviewable entries of subject merchandise during the POR.\4\ After the Preliminary Results, we received no comments or additional information with respect to Qingdao Shinhan. Therefore, for the final results, we continue to find that Qingdao Shinhan did not have any reviewable entries of subject merchandise during the POR. Consistent with our ``automatic assessment'' clarification, we will issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on our final results.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Preliminary Results and the accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 5. \5\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 4, 2011) (Assessment Practice Refinement); see also the ``Assessment'' section of this notice, below. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on our analysis of comments received, we made revisions that have changed the results for certain companies, including the valuation of certain factors of production and the PRC-wide rate. Additionally, we made calculation programming changes for the final results. For further details on the changes we made for these final results, see the company-specific analysis memoranda, the Issues and Decision Memorandum, and the final surrogate value memorandum, dated concurrently with this notice. Final Results of the Review As a result of this administrative review, we determine that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period November 1, 2012, through October 31, 2013: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ During this segment of the proceeding, we identified certain name variations for several companies. See Preliminary Results, 79 FR at 71981, n.9, n.10, and n.11, and the accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 7-8. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Company \6\ Margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Bosun Tools Co., Ltd.................................. 1.51 Chengdu Huifeng Diamond Tools Co., Ltd................ 2.34 Danyang City Ou Di Ma Tools Co., Ltd.................. 2.34 Danyang Huachang Diamond Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 2.34 Danyang NYCL Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd............. 2.34 Danyang Tsunda Diamond Tools Co., Ltd................. 2.34 Danyang Weiwang Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd.......... 2.34 [[Page 32345]] Guilin Tebon Superhard Material Co., Ltd.............. 2.34 Hangzhou Deer King Industrial and Trading Co., Ltd.... 2.34 Hangzhou Kingburg Import & Export Co., Ltd............ 2.34 Huzhou Gu's Import & Export Co., Ltd.................. 2.34 Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond Tool Manufacture Co., Ltd..... 2.34 Jiangsu Inter-China Group Corporation................. 2.34 Jiangsu Youhe Tool Manufacturer Co., Ltd.............. 2.34 Pujiang Talent Diamond Tools Co., Ltd................. 2.34 Qingdao Hyosung Diamond Tools Co., Ltd................ 2.34 Qingyuan Shangtai Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.............. 2.34 Quanzhou Zhongzhi Diamond Tool Co. Ltd................ 2.34 Rizhao Hein Saw Co., Ltd.............................. 2.34 Saint-Gobain Abrasives (Shanghai) Co., Ltd............ 2.34 Shanghai Jingquan Ind. Trade Co., Ltd................. 2.34 Shanghai Starcraft Tools Company Limited.............. 2.34 Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co., Ltd...... 3.35 Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co.................. 2.34 Xiamen ZL Diamond Technology Co., Ltd................. 2.34 Zhejiang Wanli Tools Group Co., Ltd................... 2.34 PRC-Wide Entity \7\................................... 82.05 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Assessment --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ The PRC-wide entity includes the following companies: ATM Single Entity, Central Iron and Steel Research Institute Group, China Iron and Steel Research Institute Group, Danyang Aurui Hardware Products Co., Ltd., Danyang Dida Diamond Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Electrolux Construction Products (Xiamen) Co. Ltd., Fujian Quanzhou Wanlong Stone Co., Ltd., Hebei Jikai Industrial Group Co., Ltd., Huachang Diamond Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Hua Da Superabrasive Tools Technology Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Fengyu Tools Co., Ltd., Jiangyin Likn Industry Co., Ltd., Protech Diamond Tools, Quanzhou Shuangyang Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., Quanzhou Zongzhi Diamond Tool Co. Ltd., Shanghai Deda Industry & Trading Co., Ltd., Shanghai Robtol Tool Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Shijiazhuang Global New Century Tools Co., Ltd., Sichuan Huili Tools Co., Task Tools & Abrasives, Wanli Tools Group, Wuxi Lianhua Superhard Material Tools Co., Ltd., Zhejiang Tea Import & Export Co., Ltd., Zhejiang Wanda Import and Export Co., Zhejiang Wanda Tools Group Corp., and Zhejiang Wanli Super-hard Materials Co., Ltd. ATM Single Entity includes Advanced Technology & Materials Co., Ltd. (ATM), Beijing Gang Yan Diamond Products Co. (BGY), Yichang HXF Circular Saw Industrial Co., Ltd. (currently HXF Saw Co., Ltd.) (HXF), Cliff (Tianjin) International Ltd (Cliff), and AT&M International Trading Co., Ltd. Cliff also used the company name Cliff International Ltd. See 3rd Review Prelim, 78 FR at 77099, n.4, and the accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 5, n.24, unchanged in 3rd Review Final for HXF's name change and Cliff's use of another company name. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.\8\ For customers or importers of Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co., Ltd. (Weihai) for which we do not have entered values, we calculated customer-/importer-specific antidumping duty assessment amounts based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping duties calculated for the examined sales of subject merchandise to the total sales quantity of those same sales.\9\ For customers or importers of Bosun Tools Co., Ltd., and Weihai for which we received entered-value information, we have calculated customer/ importer-specific antidumping duty assessment rates based on customer-/ importer-specific ad valorem rates in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). \9\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For all non-selected respondents that received a separate rate, we will instruct CBP to apply an antidumping duty assessment rate of 2.34 percent \10\ to all entries of subject merchandise that entered the United States during the POR. For all other companies, except as described in Comment 2 of the Issues and Decision Memorandum, we will instruct CBP to apply the antidumping duty assessment rate of the PRC- wide entity, 82.05 percent, to all entries of subject merchandise exported by these companies.\11\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 5-6. \11\ Effective March 22, 2013, a date which falls within the period of this administrative review, the Department partially revoked the antidumping duty order with respect to the entries of diamond sawblades from the PRC produced and exported by three members of the ATM Single Entity: ATM, BGY, and HXF. See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From the People's Republic of China and Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Implementation of Determinations Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act and Partial Revocation of the Antidumping Duty Orders, 78 FR 18958, 18959 n.10, 18960 (March 28, 2013) (Section 129 Partial Revocation). In connection with a temporary restraining order and subsequent injunction issued by the U.S. Court of International Trade in Court No. 09-00511, the Department had suspended entries of subject merchandise exported by the ATM Single Entity. See Section 129 Partial Revocation, 78 FR 18958, 18960 n.20. This injunction has dissolved as a result of the final and conclusive court decision in Advanced Technology & Materials Co., Ltd. et al. v. United States, Court No. 2014-1154 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 24, 2014). Accordingly, we intend to liquidate the entries of subject merchandise exported by the ATM Single Entity as explained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 2. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to a refinement to the Department's assessment practice in NME cases,\12\ for entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted by companies individually examined during this review, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide rate. In addition, for Qingdao Shinhan, the exporter that we determined had no reviewable entries of the subject merchandise in this review period, any suspended entries that entered under that exporter's case number (i.e., at that exporter's rate) will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Assessment Practice Refinement. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- We intend to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of the final results of review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of these final results of review for all shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For subject merchandise exported by the companies listed above that have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established in these final results of review for each exporter as listed above; (2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC [[Page 32346]] and non-PRC exporters not listed above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that for the PRC-wide entity, except as described in Comment 2 of the Issues and Decision Memorandum; \13\ (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ Consistent with partial revocation of the order in Section 129 Partial Revocation and the dissolution of injunction pursuant to which incoming entries of subject merchandise from the ATM Single Entity remained suspended from liquidation, no cash deposits for estimated antidumping duties will be required for ATM, BGY, and HXF. See Section 129 Partial Revocation, 78 FR at 18959 n.10 and 18960 (``Accordingly, the Department will instruct CBP . . . to discontinue the collection of cash deposits for estimated antidumping duties for {ATM, BGY, and HXF{time} ''). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. These final results of review are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act. Dated: June 2, 2015. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix Summary Background Company Abbreviations Other Abbreviations Diamond Sawblades Administrative Determinations and Results Scope of the Order Surrogate Country Separate Rates Discussion of the Issues Separate Rate Untimely Filed Separate Rate Applications Value-Added Tax Differential Pricing Surrogate Values Request To Apply Adverse Facts Available Recommendation [FR Doc. 2015-13942 Filed 6-5-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![32344 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 109 / Monday, June 8, 2015 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE the Preliminary Results and, at the Compliance Web site at http://
request of interested parties, held a enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.
International Trade Administration hearing on April 15, 2015. We extended
Final Determination of No Shipments
[A–570–900] the due date for the final results of
review to June 2, 2015.2 We conducted We preliminarily found that Qingdao
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof this administrative review in Shinhan Diamond Industrial Co., Ltd.
From the People’s Republic of China; accordance with section 751 of the (Qingdao Shinhan), which has been
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). eligible for a separate rate in previous
Administrative Review; 2012–2013 segments of the proceeding and is
Scope of the Order
subject to this review, did not have any
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, The merchandise subject to the order reviewable entries of subject
International Trade Administration, is diamond sawblades. The diamond merchandise during the POR.4 After the
Department of Commerce. sawblades subject to the order are Preliminary Results, we received no
SUMMARY: On December 4, 2014, the currently classifiable under subheadings comments or additional information
Department of Commerce (the 8202 to 8206 of the Harmonized Tariff with respect to Qingdao Shinhan.
Department) published the preliminary Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), Therefore, for the final results, we
results of the administrative review of and may also enter under 6804.21.00. continue to find that Qingdao Shinhan
the antidumping duty order on diamond The HTSUS subheadings are provided did not have any reviewable entries of
sawblades and parts thereof (diamond for convenience and customs purposes. subject merchandise during the POR.
sawblades) from the People’s Republic A full description of the scope of the Consistent with our ‘‘automatic
of China (the PRC). The period of review order is contained in the Issues and assessment’’ clarification, we will issue
(POR) is November 1, 2012, through Decision Memorandum.3 The written appropriate instructions to CBP based
October 31, 2013. For the final results, description is dispositive. on our final results.5
we continue to find that certain
companies covered by this review made Analysis of Comments Received Changes Since the Preliminary Results
sales of subject merchandise at less than All issues raised in the case and Based on our analysis of comments
normal value. rebuttal briefs by parties to this received, we made revisions that have
DATES: Effective Date: June 8, 2015. administrative review are addressed in changed the results for certain
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: the Issues and Decision Memorandum. companies, including the valuation of
Michael Romani or Yang Jin Chun, AD/ A list of the issues raised is attached to certain factors of production and the
CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement this notice as an appendix. The Issues PRC-wide rate. Additionally, we made
and Compliance, International Trade and Decision Memorandum is a public calculation programming changes for
Administration, U.S. Department of document and is on file electronically the final results. For further details on
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution via Enforcement and Compliance’s the changes we made for these final
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; Antidumping and Countervailing Duty results, see the company-specific
telephone: (202) 482–0198 or (202) 482– Centralized Electronic Service System analysis memoranda, the Issues and
5760, respectively. (ACCESS). Access to ACCESS is Decision Memorandum, and the final
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: available to registered users at http:// surrogate value memorandum, dated
access.trade.gov. The Issues and concurrently with this notice.
Background Decision Memorandum is also available
to all parties in the Central Records Final Results of the Review
On December 4, 2014, the Department
published the preliminary results of the Unit, room 7046 of the main Department As a result of this administrative
administrative review of the of Commerce building. In addition, a review, we determine that the following
antidumping duty order on diamond complete version of the Issues and weighted-average dumping margins
sawblades from the PRC.1 We received Decision Memorandum can be accessed exist for the period November 1, 2012,
case and rebuttal briefs with respect to directly on the Enforcement and through October 31, 2013:
Margin
Company 6 (percent)
Bosun Tools Co., Ltd ....................................................................................................................................................................... 1.51
Chengdu Huifeng Diamond Tools Co., Ltd ..................................................................................................................................... 2.34
Danyang City Ou Di Ma Tools Co., Ltd .......................................................................................................................................... 2.34
Danyang Huachang Diamond Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................... 2.34
Danyang NYCL Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................ 2.34
Danyang Tsunda Diamond Tools Co., Ltd ...................................................................................................................................... 2.34
Danyang Weiwang Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................... 2.34
1 See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China: 4 See Preliminary Results and the accompanying
From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Second Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 5.
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Antidumping Duty Administrative Review’’ dated 5 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping
Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 71980 (December 4, May 5, 2015. Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
2014) (Preliminary Results), and the accompanying 3 See the memorandum from Deputy Assistant
Preliminary Decision Memorandum. FR 65694 (October 4, 2011) (Assessment Practice
2 See the memorandum to Associate Deputy
Secretary Christian Marsh to Acting Assistant Refinement); see also the ‘‘Assessment’’ section of
Secretary Ronald K. Lorentzen entitled ‘‘Issues and this notice, below.
Assistant Secretary Gary Taverman entitled
‘‘Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the Decision Memorandum for the Administrative 6 During this segment of the proceeding, we
People’s Republic of China: Extension of Deadline Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on identified certain name variations for several
for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the
companies. See Preliminary Results, 79 FR at
Administrative Review’’ dated April 1, 2015, and People’s Republic of China’’ dated June 2, 2015,
71981, n.9, n.10, and n.11, and the accompanying
the memorandum to Deputy Assistant Secretary (Issues and Decision Memorandum) and hereby
Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 7–8.
Christian Marsh entitled ‘‘Diamond Sawblades and adopted by this notice, at 4–5.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:09 Jun 05, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM 08JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_32453/page/1.svg)
![32346 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 109 / Monday, June 8, 2015 / Notices
and non-PRC exporters not listed above Dated: June 2, 2015. under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule
that received a separate rate in a prior Ronald K. Lorentzen, of the United States (HTSUS) item
segment of this proceeding, the cash Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement numbers 2918.14.0000, 2918.15.1000,
deposit rate will continue to be the and Compliance. 2918.15.5000, 3824.90.9290, and
exporter-specific rate; (3) for all PRC 3824.90.9290. Although the HTSUS
Appendix numbers are provided for convenience
exporters of subject merchandise that
have not been found to be entitled to a Summary and customs purposes, the written
Background product description remains dispositive.
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will Company Abbreviations A full description of the scope of the
be that for the PRC-wide entity, except Other Abbreviations order is contained in the memorandum
as described in Comment 2 of the Issues Diamond Sawblades Administrative from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
and Decision Memorandum; 13 (4) for all Determinations and Results
Secretary for Antidumping and
non-PRC exporters of subject Scope of the Order
Surrogate Country Countervailing Duty Operations to
merchandise which have not received Ronald K Lorentzen, Acting Assistant
Separate Rates
their own rate, the cash deposit rate will Secretary for Enforcement and
Discussion of the Issues
be the rate applicable to the PRC Separate Rate Compliance, ‘‘Decision Memorandum
exporter that supplied that non-PRC Untimely Filed Separate Rate Applications for the Preliminary Results of the
exporter. These deposit requirements Value-Added Tax Countervailing Duty Administrative
shall remain in effect until further Differential Pricing Review: Citric Acid and Certain Citrate
notice. Surrogate Values Salts; 2013’’ (Preliminary Decision
Request To Apply Adverse Facts Available Memorandum), dated concurrently
Notification to Importers Recommendation
with, and hereby adopted by, this
[FR Doc. 2015–13942 Filed 6–5–15; 8:45 am] notice.
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
is on file electronically via Enforcement
certificate regarding the reimbursement DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE and Compliance’s Antidumping and
of antidumping duties prior to Countervailing Duty Centralized
liquidation of the relevant entries International Trade Administration Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
during this review period. Failure to [C–570–938] ACCESS is available to registered users
comply with this requirement could at http://access.trade.gov and in the
result in the Secretary’s presumption Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts: Central Records Unit, Room 7046 of the
that reimbursement of the antidumping Preliminary Results of Countervailing main Department of Commerce
duties occurred and the subsequent Duty Administrative Review; 2013 building. In addition, a complete
assessment of double antidumping version of the Preliminary Decision
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
duties. Memorandum can be accessed directly
International Trade Administration,
on the internet at http://www.trade.gov/
Administrative Protective Orders Department of Commerce.
enforcement/. The signed Preliminary
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce Decision Memorandum and the
This notice also serves as the only (the Department) is conducting an
reminder to parties subject to electronic version of the Preliminary
administrative review of the Decision Memorandum are identical in
administrative protective order (APO) of countervailing duty (CVD) order on content.
their responsibility concerning the citric acid and certain citrate salts from
return or destruction of proprietary the People’s Republic of China (PRC) for Methodology
information disclosed under APO in the period of review (POR) covering The Department conducted this
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). January 1, 2013, through December 31, review in accordance with section
Timely written notification of the return 2013. These preliminary results cover 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
or destruction of APO materials or Laiwu Taihe Biochemistry Co. Ltd. amended (the Act). For each of the
conversion to judicial protective order is (Taihe). We preliminarily determine subsidy programs found
hereby requested. Failure to comply that Taihe received countervailable countervailable, we preliminarily
with the regulations and terms of an subsidies during the POR. Interested determine that there is a subsidy (i.e., a
APO is a sanctionable violation. parties are invited to comment on these financial contribution from an authority
preliminary results. that gives rise to a benefit to the
These final results of review are
DATES: Effective Date: June 8, 2015. recipient) and that the subsidy is
issued and published in accordance
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: specific.1
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the In making these findings, we relied, in
Act. Elizabeth Eastwood or Shannon
Morrison, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, part, on facts otherwise available.
Enforcement and Compliance, Because the Government of the PRC did
13 Consistent with partial revocation of the order International Trade Administration, not act to the best of its ability to
in Section 129 Partial Revocation and the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th respond to the Department’s requests for
dissolution of injunction pursuant to which Street and Constitution Avenue NW., information, we used an adverse
inference in selecting from among the
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
incoming entries of subject merchandise from the Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202)
ATM Single Entity remained suspended from 482–3874 or (202) 482–6274, facts otherwise available.2 For further
liquidation, no cash deposits for estimated
respectively. information, see ‘‘Use of Facts
antidumping duties will be required for ATM, BGY,
and HXF. See Section 129 Partial Revocation, 78 FR Scope of the Order 1 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act
at 18959 n.10 and 18960 (‘‘Accordingly, the regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E)
Department will instruct CBP . . . to discontinue The merchandise subject to the order of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of
the collection of cash deposits for estimated is citric acid and certain citrate salts. the Act regarding specificity.
antidumping duties for {ATM, BGY, and HXF}’’). The product is currently classified 2 See sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:09 Jun 05, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM 08JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_32453/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-22 10:12:20
Document Modified: 2018-02-22 10:12:20
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective Date: June 8, 2015. | |
| Contact | Michael Romani or Yang Jin Chun, AD/ CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 0198 or (202) 482-5760, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 32344 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR