80 FR 33324 - Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Vision
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 112 (June 11, 2015)
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 112 (June 11, 2015)
| Page Range | 33324-33326 | |
| FR Document | 2015-14273 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 112 (Thursday, June 11, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 33324-33326] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-14273] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration [Docket No. FMCSA-2014-0303] Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Vision AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of final disposition. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its decision to exempt 21 individuals from the vision requirement in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs). They are unable to meet the vision requirement in one eye for various reasons. The exemptions will enable these individuals to operate commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) in interstate commerce without meeting the prescribed vision requirement in one eye. The Agency has concluded that granting these exemptions will provide a level of safety that is equivalent to or greater than the level of safety maintained without the exemptions for these CMV drivers. DATES: The exemptions were granted April 18, 2015. The exemptions expire on April 18, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles A. Horan, III, Director, Carrier, Driver and Vehicle Safety Standards, (202) 366-4001, [email protected], FMCSA, Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W64-224, Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. If you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, contact Docket Services, telephone (202) 366- 9826. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Electronic Access You may see all the comments online through the Federal Document Management System (FDMS) at http://www.regulations.gov. Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments, go to http://www.regulations.gov and/or Room W12-140 on the ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Privacy Act: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts these comments, without edit, including any personal information the commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at www.dot.gov/privacy. II. Background On March 18, 2015, FMCSA published a notice of receipt of exemption applications from certain individuals, and requested comments from the public (80 FR 14240). That notice listed 21 applicants' case histories. The 21 individuals applied for exemptions from the vision requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10), for drivers who operate CMVs in interstate commerce. Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may grant an exemption for a 2-year period if it finds ``such exemption would likely achieve a level of safety that is equivalent to or greater than the level that would be achieved absent such exemption.'' The statute also allows the Agency to renew exemptions at the end of the 2-year period. Accordingly, FMCSA has evaluated the 21 applications on their merits and made a determination to grant exemptions to each of them. III. Vision and Driving Experience of the Applicants The vision requirement in the FMCSRs provides: A person is physically qualified to drive a commercial motor vehicle if that person has distant visual acuity of at least 20/40 (Snellen) in each eye without corrective lenses or visual acuity separately corrected to 20/40 (Snellen) or better with corrective lenses, distant binocular acuity of a least 20/40 (Snellen) in both eyes with or without corrective lenses, field of vision of at least 70 [deg] in the horizontal meridian in each eye, and the ability to recognize the colors of traffic signals and devices showing red, green, and amber (49 CFR 391.41(b)(10)). FMCSA recognizes that some drivers do not meet the vision requirement but have adapted their driving to accommodate their vision limitation and demonstrated their ability to drive safely. The 21 exemption applicants listed in this notice are in this category. They are unable to meet the vision requirement in one eye for various reasons, including Best disease, toxoplasmosis scar, corneal scar, hemorrhage, retinal detachment, amblyopia, displaced pupil, cataract, macular drusen, esotropia, refractive amblyopia, complete loss of vision, maculopathy, chronic central serous retinopathy, hyperopia, retinal tear, calcification of cornea, and failed penetrating keratoplasty. In most cases, their eye conditions were not recently developed. Thirteen of the applicants were either born with their vision impairments or have had them since childhood. The eight individuals that sustained their vision conditions as adults have had it for a range of one to 29 years. Although each applicant has one eye which does not meet the vision requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10), each has at least 20/40 corrected vision in the other eye, and in a doctor's opinion, has sufficient vision to perform all the tasks necessary to operate a CMV. Doctors' opinions are supported by the applicants' possession of valid commercial driver's licenses (CDLs) or non-CDLs to operate CMVs. Before issuing CDLs, States subject drivers to knowledge and skills tests designed to evaluate their qualifications to operate a CMV. All of these applicants satisfied the testing requirements for their State of residence. By meeting State licensing requirements, the applicants demonstrated their ability to operate a CMV, with their limited vision, to the satisfaction of the State. While possessing a valid CDL or non-CDL, these 21 drivers have been authorized to drive a CMV in intrastate commerce, even though their vision disqualified them from driving in interstate commerce. They have driven CMVs with their limited vision in careers ranging from one to 29 years. In the past three years, one of drivers was involved in a crash and two were convicted of moving violations in a CMV. The qualifications, experience, and medical condition of each applicant [[Page 33325]] were stated and discussed in detail in the March 18, 2015 notice (80 FR 14240). IV. Basis for Exemption Determination Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may grant an exemption from the vision requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10) if the exemption is likely to achieve an equivalent or greater level of safety than would be achieved without the exemption. Without the exemption, applicants will continue to be restricted to intrastate driving. With the exemption, applicants can drive in interstate commerce. Thus, our analysis focuses on whether an equal or greater level of safety is likely to be achieved by permitting each of these drivers to drive in interstate commerce as opposed to restricting him or her to driving in intrastate commerce. To evaluate the effect of these exemptions on safety, FMCSA considered the medical reports about the applicants' vision as well as their driving records and experience with the vision deficiency. To qualify for an exemption from the vision requirement, FMCSA requires a person to present verifiable evidence that he/she has driven a commercial vehicle safely with the vision deficiency for the past 3 years. Recent driving performance is especially important in evaluating future safety, according to several research studies designed to correlate past and future driving performance. Results of these studies support the principle that the best predictor of future performance by a driver is his/her past record of crashes and traffic violations. Copies of the studies may be found at Docket Number FMCSA-1998-3637. FMCSA believes it can properly apply the principle to monocular drivers, because data from the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) former waiver study program clearly demonstrate the driving performance of experienced monocular drivers in the program is better than that of all CMV drivers collectively (See 61 FR 13338, 13345, March 26, 1996). The fact that experienced monocular drivers demonstrated safe driving records in the waiver program supports a conclusion that other monocular drivers, meeting the same qualifying conditions as those required by the waiver program, are also likely to have adapted to their vision deficiency and will continue to operate safely. The first major research correlating past and future performance was done in England by Greenwood and Yule in 1920. Subsequent studies, building on that model, concluded that crash rates for the same individual exposed to certain risks for two different time periods vary only slightly (See Bates and Neyman, University of California Publications in Statistics, April 1952). Other studies demonstrated theories of predicting crash proneness from crash history coupled with other factors. These factors--such as age, sex, geographic location, mileage driven and conviction history--are used every day by insurance companies and motor vehicle bureaus to predict the probability of an individual experiencing future crashes (See Weber, Donald C., ``Accident Rate Potential: An Application of Multiple Regression Analysis of a Poisson Process,'' Journal of American Statistical Association, June 1971). A 1964 California Driver Record Study prepared by the California Department of Motor Vehicles concluded that the best overall crash predictor for both concurrent and nonconcurrent events is the number of single convictions. This study used 3 consecutive years of data, comparing the experiences of drivers in the first 2 years with their experiences in the final year. Applying principles from these studies to the past 3-year record of the 21 applicants, one driver was involved in a crash, and two were convicted of moving violations in a CMV. All the applicants achieved a record of safety while driving with their vision impairment, demonstrating the likelihood that they have adapted their driving skills to accommodate their condition. As the applicants' ample driving histories with their vision deficiencies are good predictors of future performance, FMCSA concludes their ability to drive safely can be projected into the future. We believe that the applicants' intrastate driving experience and history provide an adequate basis for predicting their ability to drive safely in interstate commerce. Intrastate driving, like interstate operations, involves substantial driving on highways on the interstate system and on other roads built to interstate standards. Moreover, driving in congested urban areas exposes the driver to more pedestrian and vehicular traffic than exists on interstate highways. Faster reaction to traffic and traffic signals is generally required because distances between them are more compact. These conditions tax visual capacity and driver response just as intensely as interstate driving conditions. The veteran drivers in this proceeding have operated CMVs safely under those conditions for at least 3 years, most for much longer. Their experience and driving records lead us to believe that each applicant is capable of operating in interstate commerce as safely as he/she has been performing in intrastate commerce. Consequently, FMCSA finds that exempting these applicants from the vision requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10) is likely to achieve a level of safety equal to that existing without the exemption. For this reason, the Agency is granting the exemptions for the 2-year period allowed by 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315 to the 21 applicants listed in the notice of March 18, 2015 (80 FR 14240). We recognize that the vision of an applicant may change and affect his/her ability to operate a CMV as safely as in the past. As a condition of the exemption, therefore, FMCSA will impose requirements on the 21 individuals consistent with the grandfathering provisions applied to drivers who participated in the Agency's vision waiver program. Those requirements are found at 49 CFR 391.64(b) and include the following: (1) That each individual be physically examined every year (a) by an ophthalmologist or optometrist who attests that the vision in the better eye continues to meet the requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10) and (b) by a medical examiner who attests that the individual is otherwise physically qualified under 49 CFR 391.41; (2) that each individual provide a copy of the ophthalmologist's or optometrist's report to the medical examiner at the time of the annual medical examination; and (3) that each individual provide a copy of the annual medical certification to the employer for retention in the driver's qualification file, or keep a copy in his/her driver's qualification file if he/she is self-employed. The driver must have a copy of the certification when driving, for presentation to a duly authorized Federal, State, or local enforcement official. V. Discussion of Comments FMCSA received four comments in this proceeding. The comments are discussed below. Casey Fleming agrees with the proposal to grant the 21 drivers in this proceeding exemptions from the Federal vision standard. Larry Worley agrees with the proposal to grant Ronald J. Gruszecki an exemption from the Federal vision standard. An anonymous commenter agrees with the proposal to grant Raymond W. Pitts an exemption from the Federal vision standard. An anonymous commenter agrees with the proposal to grant Neal S. Anderson, Robert D. Arkwright, Randy [[Page 33326]] A. Cimei, and Ronald J. Gruszecki exemptions from the Federal vision standard. IV. Conclusion Based upon its evaluation of the 21 exemption applications, FMCSA exempts the following drivers from the vision requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10), subject to the requirements cited above (49 CFR 391.64(b)): Neal S. Anderson (MN) Robert D. Arkwright (MS) Charles D. Ashworth, Jr. (KY) Randy A. Cimei (IL) Ronald J. Gruszecki (IL) Gerald L. Harper (MO) Alan L. Helfer, Sr. (IL) Steven R. Jones (KS) William F. Laforce (VT) Robert N. Lewis (OH) Ryan T. McKinney (TN) Freeman A. Miller (OH) Larry G. Murray (LA) Thomas W. Oberschlake (OH) Dennis R. Ohl (MO) J.W. Peebles (TN) Craig C. Perrotta (MA) Raymond W. Pitts (FL) Jeffrey A. Porter (CT) Marty J. Prouty (IA) Daniel A. Rau (NJ) In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, each exemption will be valid for 2 years unless revoked earlier by FMCSA. The exemption will be revoked if: (1) The person fails to comply with the terms and conditions of the exemption; (2) the exemption has resulted in a lower level of safety than was maintained before it was granted; or (3) continuation of the exemption would not be consistent with the goals and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136 and 31315. If the exemption is still effective at the end of the 2-year period, the person may apply to FMCSA for a renewal under procedures in effect at that time. Issued on: May 29, 2015. Larry W. Minor, Associate Administrator for Policy. [FR Doc. 2015-14273 Filed 6-10-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P
![33324 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 112 / Thursday, June 11, 2015 / Notices
Populations; E.O. 11593 Protection Federal holidays. If you have questions without corrective lenses, field of vision
and Enhancement of Cultural on viewing or submitting material to the of at least 70 ° in the horizontal
Resources; E.O. 13007 Indian docket, contact Docket Services, meridian in each eye, and the ability to
Sacred Sites; E.O. 13287 Preserve telephone (202) 366–9826. recognize the colors of traffic signals
America; E.O. 13175 Consultation SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: and devices showing red, green, and
and Coordination with Indian amber (49 CFR 391.41(b)(10)).
Tribal Governments; E.O. 11514 I. Electronic Access FMCSA recognizes that some drivers
Protection and Enhancement of You may see all the comments online do not meet the vision requirement but
Environmental Quality; E.O. 13112 through the Federal Document have adapted their driving to
Invasive Species. Management System (FDMS) at http:// accommodate their vision limitation
www.regulations.gov. and demonstrated their ability to drive
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning Docket: For access to the docket to safely. The 21 exemption applicants
and Construction. The regulations read background documents or listed in this notice are in this category.
implementing Executive Order 12372 comments, go to http:// They are unable to meet the vision
regarding intergovernmental consultation on www.regulations.gov and/or Room requirement in one eye for various
Federal programs and activities apply to this W12–140 on the ground level of the reasons, including Best disease,
program.) West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue toxoplasmosis scar, corneal scar,
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. hemorrhage, retinal detachment,
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, amblyopia, displaced pupil, cataract,
Cesar Perez, except Federal holidays. macular drusen, esotropia, refractive
Senior Transportation Engineer, Federal Privacy Act: In accordance with 5 amblyopia, complete loss of vision,
Highway Administration, Sacramento, U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments maculopathy, chronic central serous
California. from the public to better inform its retinopathy, hyperopia, retinal tear,
[FR Doc. 2015–14264 Filed 6–10–15; 8:45 am] rulemaking process. DOT posts these calcification of cornea, and failed
BILLING CODE 4910–RY–P comments, without edit, including any penetrating keratoplasty. In most cases,
personal information the commenter their eye conditions were not recently
provides, to www.regulations.gov, as developed. Thirteen of the applicants
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION described in the system of records were either born with their vision
notice (DOT/ALL–14 FDMS), which can impairments or have had them since
Federal Motor Carrier Safety childhood.
be reviewed at www.dot.gov/privacy.
Administration The eight individuals that sustained
[Docket No. FMCSA–2014–0303]
II. Background their vision conditions as adults have
On March 18, 2015, FMCSA had it for a range of one to 29 years.
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption published a notice of receipt of Although each applicant has one eye
Applications; Vision exemption applications from certain which does not meet the vision
individuals, and requested comments requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10),
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety each has at least 20/40 corrected vision
from the public (80 FR 14240). That
Administration (FMCSA), DOT. in the other eye, and in a doctor’s
notice listed 21 applicants’ case
ACTION: Notice of final disposition. histories. The 21 individuals applied for opinion, has sufficient vision to perform
SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its exemptions from the vision requirement all the tasks necessary to operate a CMV.
decision to exempt 21 individuals from in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10), for drivers who Doctors’ opinions are supported by the
the vision requirement in the Federal operate CMVs in interstate commerce. applicants’ possession of valid
Motor Carrier Safety Regulations Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, commercial driver’s licenses (CDLs) or
(FMCSRs). They are unable to meet the FMCSA may grant an exemption for a 2- non-CDLs to operate CMVs. Before
vision requirement in one eye for year period if it finds ‘‘such exemption issuing CDLs, States subject drivers to
various reasons. The exemptions will would likely achieve a level of safety knowledge and skills tests designed to
enable these individuals to operate that is equivalent to or greater than the evaluate their qualifications to operate a
commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) in level that would be achieved absent CMV.
such exemption.’’ The statute also All of these applicants satisfied the
interstate commerce without meeting
allows the Agency to renew exemptions testing requirements for their State of
the prescribed vision requirement in
at the end of the 2-year period. residence. By meeting State licensing
one eye. The Agency has concluded that
Accordingly, FMCSA has evaluated the requirements, the applicants
granting these exemptions will provide
21 applications on their merits and demonstrated their ability to operate a
a level of safety that is equivalent to or
made a determination to grant CMV, with their limited vision, to the
greater than the level of safety
exemptions to each of them. satisfaction of the State.
maintained without the exemptions for While possessing a valid CDL or non-
these CMV drivers. III. Vision and Driving Experience of CDL, these 21 drivers have been
DATES: The exemptions were granted the Applicants authorized to drive a CMV in intrastate
April 18, 2015. The exemptions expire The vision requirement in the commerce, even though their vision
on April 18, 2017. FMCSRs provides: disqualified them from driving in
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A person is physically qualified to interstate commerce. They have driven
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Charles A. Horan, III, Director, Carrier, drive a commercial motor vehicle if that CMVs with their limited vision in
Driver and Vehicle Safety Standards, person has distant visual acuity of at careers ranging from one to 29 years. In
(202) 366–4001, fmcsamedical@dot.gov, least 20/40 (Snellen) in each eye the past three years, one of drivers was
FMCSA, Department of Transportation, without corrective lenses or visual involved in a crash and two were
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room acuity separately corrected to 20/40 convicted of moving violations in a
W64–224, Washington, DC 20590–0001. (Snellen) or better with corrective CMV.
Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 lenses, distant binocular acuity of a least The qualifications, experience, and
p.m., Monday through Friday, except 20/40 (Snellen) in both eyes with or medical condition of each applicant
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:06 Jun 10, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00097 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM 11JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_33436/page/1.svg)
![33326 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 112 / Thursday, June 11, 2015 / Notices
A. Cimei, and Ronald J. Gruszecki ACTION: Denial of exemption The decision of the Agency must be
exemptions from the Federal vision application. published in the Federal Register (49
standard. CFR 381.315(b)). If the Agency denies
SUMMARY: FMCSA denies an exemption the request, it must state the reason for
IV. Conclusion application from the International doing so. If the decision is to grant the
Based upon its evaluation of the 21 Window Film Association (IWFA) to exemption, the notice must specify the
exemption applications, FMCSA allow the use of glazing in the windows person or class of persons receiving the
exempts the following drivers from the to the immediate right and left of the exemption and the regulatory provision
vision requirement in 49 CFR driver that does not meet the light or provisions from which an exemption
391.41(b)(10), subject to the transmission requirements specified in is granted. The notice must also specify
requirements cited above (49 CFR the Federal Motor Carrier Safety the effective period of the exemption
391.64(b)): Regulations (FMCSR). The current rule
(up to 2 years) and explain the terms
Neal S. Anderson (MN) permits windshields and side windows
and conditions of the exemption. The
Robert D. Arkwright (MS) of commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) to
exemption may be renewed (49 CFR
Charles D. Ashworth, Jr. (KY) be tinted as long as the light
381.315(c) and 49 CFR 381.300(b)).
Randy A. Cimei (IL) transmission is not restricted to less
Ronald J. Gruszecki (IL) than 70 percent of normal. While IWFA IWFA Application for Exemption
Gerald L. Harper (MO) contended that a reduction of light IWFA applied for an exemption from
Alan L. Helfer, Sr. (IL) entering the truck cab interior can (1) 49 CFR 393.60(d) to allow the use of
Steven R. Jones (KS) significantly improve driver comfort, (2) glazing in the windows to the
William F. Laforce (VT) reduce eye strain, and (3) reduce the immediate right and left of the driver
Robert N. Lewis (OH) heat load of the interior environment, that does not meet the light
Ryan T. McKinney (TN) thus making the driver more transmission requirements specified in
Freeman A. Miller (OH) comfortable as well as lowering energy the FMCSRs. A copy of the application
Larry G. Murray (LA) use for cooling, it failed to provide any is included in the docket referenced at
Thomas W. Oberschlake (OH) evidence that motor carriers operating the beginning of this notice.
Dennis R. Ohl (MO) CMVs equipped with glazing that blocks Section 393.60(d) of the FMCSRs
J.W. Peebles (TN) more normal light than currently
Craig C. Perrotta (MA) permits coloring or tinting of
permitted will achieve a level of safety windshields and the windows to the
Raymond W. Pitts (FL) that is equivalent to, or greater than, the
Jeffrey A. Porter (CT) immediate right and left of the driver, as
level of safety that would be obtained by long as the ‘‘parallel luminous
Marty J. Prouty (IA) complying with the regulation.
Daniel A. Rau (NJ) transmittance through the colored or
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. tinted glazing is not less than 70 percent
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) Mike Huntley, Vehicle and Roadside
and 31315, each exemption will be valid of the light at normal incidence in those
Operations Division, Office of Bus and portions of the windshield or windows
for 2 years unless revoked earlier by Truck Standards and Operations, MC–
FMCSA. The exemption will be revoked which are marked as having a parallel
PSV, (202) 366–5370; Federal Motor luminous transmittance of not less than
if: (1) The person fails to comply with Carrier Safety Administration, 1200
the terms and conditions of the 70 percent.’’ The transmittance
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, restriction does not apply to other
exemption; (2) the exemption has DC 20590–0001.
resulted in a lower level of safety than windows on the commercial motor
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: vehicle.
was maintained before it was granted; or
(3) continuation of the exemption would Background In its application, IWFA states:
not be consistent with the goals and Section 4007 of the Transportation Many commercial operators, however,
objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136 and 31315. Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA– have been unable to obtain the approved film
If the exemption is still effective at the products in a timely and local basis; this has
21) [Pub. L. 105–178, June 9, 1998, 112 generated a significant volume of inquiries to
end of the 2-year period, the person may Stat. 401] amended 49 U.S.C. 31315 and federal, state, and association offices. We are
apply to FMCSA for a renewal under 31136(e) to provide authority to grant therefore requesting a favorable consideration
procedures in effect at that time. exemptions from the FMCSRs. On for the use of a market-standard 50%-type of
Issued on: May 29, 2015. August 20, 2004, FMCSA published a film with a 7% measurement tolerance (to
Larry W. Minor, final rule (69 FR 51589) implementing accommodate variances in glass, glass
section 4007. Under this rule, FMCSA condition, film manufacturing variation, and
Associate Administrator for Policy.
must publish a notice of each exemption meter differences.) This would allow the
[FR Doc. 2015–14273 Filed 6–10–15; 8:45 am] standard 50%-type film to be used on CMVs
request in the Federal Register (49 CFR
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P for the windows to the immediate right and
381.315(a)). The Agency must provide left of the driver. This film is the same
the public with an opportunity to minimum visibility requirement used in the
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION inspect the information relevant to the majority of states for automobiles and is
application, including any safety essentially ‘‘clear’’ to the extent that, in most
Federal Motor Carrier Safety analyses that have been conducted. The cases, it is difficult to determine if a vehicle
Administration Agency must also provide an even has had film applied. Since a reduction
opportunity for public comment on the of light entering the truck cab interior will
[[Docket No. FMCSA–2013–0436] decrease not only available visible light but
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
request.
The Agency reviews the safety also scattered light (sometimes called
Parts and Accessories Necessary for ‘‘interference haze’’ by optical researchers), it
analyses and the public comments and
Safe Operation; Denial of the can significantly improve driver comfort and
determines whether granting the
International Window Film reduce eye strain while also allowing films
exemption would likely achieve a level to be used which can also reduce the heat
Association’s Exemption Application
of safety equivalent to or greater than load of the interior environment, thus making
AGENCY:Federal Motor Carrier Safety the level that would be achieved by the the driver more comfortable as well as
Administration (FMCSA), DOT. current regulation (49 CFR 381.305). lowering energy use for cooling.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:06 Jun 10, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00099 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM 11JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_33436/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-15 15:07:24
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 15:07:24
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice of final disposition. | |
| Dates | The exemptions were granted April 18, 2015. The exemptions expire on April 18, 2017. | |
| Contact | Charles A. Horan, III, Director, Carrier, Driver and Vehicle Safety Standards, (202) 366-4001, [email protected], FMCSA, Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W64-224, Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. If you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, contact Docket Services, telephone (202) 366- 9826. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 33324 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR