80 FR 33331 - Continental Tire the Americas, LLC, Grant of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 112 (June 11, 2015)

Page Range		33331-33332
FR Document		2015-14252

Continental Tire the Americas, LLC, (CTA), has determined that certain Continental replacement passenger car tires do not fully comply with paragraph S5.5(f) of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 139, New Pneumatic Radial Tires for Light Vehicles. CTA has filed an appropriate report dated January 7, 2015, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 112 (Thursday, June 11, 2015)

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 112 (Thursday, June 11, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33331-33332]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-14252]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2015-0015; Notice 2]


Continental Tire the Americas, LLC, Grant of Petition for 
Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), 
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Grant of petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Continental Tire the Americas, LLC, (CTA), has determined that 
certain Continental replacement passenger car tires do not fully comply 
with paragraph S5.5(f) of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 
No. 139, New Pneumatic Radial Tires for Light Vehicles. CTA has filed 
an appropriate report dated January 7, 2015, pursuant to 49 CFR part 
573, Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports.

ADDRESSES: For further information on this decision contact Abraham 
Diaz, Office of Vehicles Safety Compliance, the National Highway 
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), telephone (202) 366-5310, 
facsimile (202) 366-5930.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    I. CTA's Petition: Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) (see 
implementing rule at 49 CFR part 556), CTA submitted a petition for an 
exemption from the notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. 
Chapter 301 on the basis that this noncompliance is inconsequential to 
motor vehicle safety.
    Notice of receipt of the CTA's petition was published, with a 30-
day public comment period, on April 16, 2015 in the Federal Register 
(80 FR 20570). No comments were received. To view the petition and all 
supporting documents log onto the Federal Docket Management System 
(FDMS) Web site at: http://www.regulations.gov/. Then follow the online 
search instructions to locate docket number ``NHTSA-2015-0015.''
    II. Tires Involved: Affected are approximately 116,500 Continental 
ExtremeContact DWS size 225/45R17 91W, Continental ExtremeContact DW 
size 225/45R17 91W and General G-Max AS-03 size 225/45R17 91W passenger 
car tires.
    III. Noncompliance: CTA explains that the noncompliance is that due 
to mold labeling errors, the sidewall markings on the subject tires do 
not correctly describe the actual number of plies in the tread area of 
the tires as required by paragraph S5.5(f) of FMVSS No. 139. 
Specifically, the Continental ExtremeContact DWS size 225/45R17 91W 
tires were manufactured with ``Tread 4 Plies: 1 Polyester + 2 Steel + 1 
Polyamide.'' The correct labeling and stamping should have been ``Tread 
5 Plies: 1 Polyester + 2 Steel + 2 Polyamide.'' The Continental 
ExtremeContact DW size 225/45R17 91W tires were manufactured with 
``Tread 4 Plies: 1 Polyester + 2 Steel + 1 Polyamide.'' The correct 
labeling and stamping should have been ``Tread 5 Plies: 1 Polyester + 2 
Steel + 2 Polyamide.'' The General G-Max AS-03 size 225/45R17 91W tires 
were manufactured with ``Plies: Tread: 1 Polyester + 2 Steel + 1 
Polyamide.'' The correct labeling and stamping should have been 
``Plies: Tread: 1 Polyester + 2 Steel + 2 Polyamide.''
    IV. Rule Text: Paragraph S5.5 of FMVSS No. 139 requires in 
pertinent part:

    S5.5 Tire Markings. Except as specified in paragraphs (a) 
through (i) of S5.5, each tire must be marked on each sidewall with 
the information specified in S5.5(a) through (d) and on one sidewall 
with the information specified in S5.5(e) through (i) according to 
the phase-in schedule specified in S7 of this standard . . .
    (f) The actual number of plies in the sidewall, and the actual 
number of plies in the tread area, if different;

    V. Summary of CTA's Analyses: CTA stated its belief that the 
subject noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety for 
the following reasons:

[[Page 33332]]

    (A) CTA believes that the mislabeling of the number of plies on the 
subject tires has no impact on the operational performance of the 
subject tires or on the safety of vehicles on which these tires are to 
be mounted. CTA states that the subject tires also meet or exceed all 
of the performance requirements specified by FMVSS No. 139.
    (B) CTA states that they are unaware of any accidents or injuries 
that have occurred as a result of this noncompliance.
    (C) CTA states that NHTSA has previously granted similar petitions 
for Inconsequential Noncompliances in the past.
    CTA has additionally informed NHTSA that it has corrected the 
subject noncompliance.
    In summation, CTA believes that the described noncompliance of the 
subject tires is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety, and that its 
petition, to exempt CTA from providing recall notification of 
noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118 and remedying the recall 
noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120 should be granted.

NHTSA's Decision

    NHTSA's Analysis of CTA's Arguments: The agency agrees with CTA 
that the noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. The 
agency believes that the true measure of inconsequentiality to motor 
vehicle safety in this case is that there is no effect of the 
noncompliance on the operational safety of the vehicles on which these 
tires are mounted. The safety of people working in the tire retread, 
repair and recycling industries must also be considered.
    Although tire construction affects the strength and durability, 
neither the agency nor the tire industry provides information relating 
tire strength and durability to the number of plies and types of ply 
cord material to the tread and sidewall. Therefore, tire dealers and 
customers should consider the tire construction information along with 
other information such as load capacity, maximum inflation pressure, 
and tread wear, temperature, and traction ratings, to assess 
performance capabilities of various tires. In the agency's judgement, 
the incorrect labeling of the tire construction information will have 
an inconsequential effect on motor vehicle safety because most 
consumers do not base tire purchases or vehicle operation parameters on 
the number of plies in a tire.
    The agency believes the noncompliance will have no measureable 
effect on the safety of tire retread, repair and recycling industries. 
The use of steel cord construction in the sidewall and tread is the 
primary safety concern of these industries. In this case, since the 
tire sidewall is marked correctly for the number of steel plies, this 
potential safety concern does not exist.
    NHTSA's Decision: In consideration of the foregoing, NHTSA has 
decided that CTA has met its burden of persuasion that the 
noncompliance described is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. 
Accordingly, CTA's petition is hereby granted and CTA is exempted from 
the obligation of providing notification of, and remedy for the subject 
noncompliance.
    NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a 
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers 
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively, 
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance 
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, this decision 
only applies to the subject tires that CTA no longer controlled at the 
time it determined that the noncompliance existed. However, the 
granting of this petition does not relieve tire distributors and 
dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for sale, or 
introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of 
the noncompliant tires under their control after CTA notified them that 
the subject noncompliance existed.

    Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: Delegations of authority at 
49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8).

Jeffrey Giuseppe,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015-14252 Filed 6-10-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-59-P

33332 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 112 / Thursday, June 11, 2015 / Notices

(A) CTA believes that the mislabeling The use of steel cord construction in the Series sedan passenger vehicles do not
of the number of plies on the subject sidewall and tread is the primary safety fully comply with paragraph S8.1.11 of
tires has no impact on the operational concern of these industries. In this case, Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard
performance of the subject tires or on since the tire sidewall is marked (FMVSS) No. 108, Lamps, Reflective
the safety of vehicles on which these correctly for the number of steel plies, Devices and Associated Equipment.
tires are to be mounted. CTA states that this potential safety concern does not BMW has filed an appropriate report
the subject tires also meet or exceed all exist. dated March 26, 2015, pursuant to 49
of the performance requirements NHTSA’s Decision: In consideration CFR part 573, Defect and
specified by FMVSS No. 139. of the foregoing, NHTSA has decided Noncompliance Responsibility and
(B) CTA states that they are unaware that CTA has met its burden of Reports.
of any accidents or injuries that have persuasion that the noncompliance DATES: The closing date for comments
occurred as a result of this described is inconsequential to motor on the petition is July 13, 2015.
noncompliance. vehicle safety. Accordingly, CTA’s
(C) CTA states that NHTSA has ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
petition is hereby granted and CTA is
previously granted similar petitions for invited to submit written data, views,
exempted from the obligation of
Inconsequential Noncompliances in the and arguments on this petition.
providing notification of, and remedy
past. Comments must refer to the docket and
for the subject noncompliance.
CTA has additionally informed notice number cited at the beginning of
NHTSA notes that the statutory
NHTSA that it has corrected the subject this notice and submitted by any of the
provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
noncompliance. following methods:
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to
In summation, CTA believes that the • Mail: Send comments by mail
file petitions for a determination of
described noncompliance of the subject addressed to: U.S. Department of
inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to
tires is inconsequential to motor vehicle Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
exempt manufacturers only from the
safety, and that its petition, to exempt 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
duties found in sections 30118 and
CTA from providing recall notification W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
30120, respectively, to notify owners,
of noncompliance as required by 49 Washington, DC 20590.
purchasers, and dealers of a defect or • Hand Deliver: Deliver comments by
U.S.C. 30118 and remedying the recall noncompliance and to remedy the
noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C. hand to: U.S. Department of
defect or noncompliance. Therefore, this Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30120 should be granted. decision only applies to the subject tires 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
NHTSA’s Decision that CTA no longer controlled at the W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
NHTSA’s Analysis of CTA’s time it determined that the Washington, DC 20590. The Docket
Arguments: The agency agrees with noncompliance existed. However, the Section is open on weekdays from 10
CTA that the noncompliance is granting of this petition does not relieve a.m. to 5 p.m. except Federal Holidays.
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. tire distributors and dealers of the • Electronically: Submit comments
The agency believes that the true prohibitions on the sale, offer for sale, electronically by: logging onto the
measure of inconsequentiality to motor or introduction or delivery for Federal Docket Management System
vehicle safety in this case is that there introduction into interstate commerce of (FDMS) Web site at http://
is no effect of the noncompliance on the the noncompliant tires under their www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online
operational safety of the vehicles on control after CTA notified them that the instructions for submitting comments.
which these tires are mounted. The subject noncompliance existed. Comments may also be faxed to (202)
safety of people working in the tire Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: 493–2251.
retread, repair and recycling industries Delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and Comments must be written in the
must also be considered. 501.8). English language, and be no greater than
Although tire construction affects the Jeffrey Giuseppe, 15 pages in length, although there is no
strength and durability, neither the Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance. limit to the length of necessary
agency nor the tire industry provides attachments to the comments. If
[FR Doc. 2015–14252 Filed 6–10–15; 8:45 am]
information relating tire strength and comments are submitted in hard copy
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
durability to the number of plies and form, please ensure that two copies are
types of ply cord material to the tread provided. If you wish to receive
and sidewall. Therefore, tire dealers and DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION confirmation that your comments were
customers should consider the tire received, please enclose a stamped, self-
construction information along with National Highway Traffic Safety addressed postcard with the comments.
other information such as load capacity, Administration Note that all comments received will be
maximum inflation pressure, and tread posted without change to http://
wear, temperature, and traction ratings, [Docket No. NHTSA–2015–0040; Notice 1] www.regulations.gov, including any
to assess performance capabilities of personal information provided.
BMW of North America, LLC, Receipt
various tires. In the agency’s judgement, Documents submitted to a docket may
of Petition for Decision of
the incorrect labeling of the tire be viewed by anyone at the address and
Inconsequential Noncompliance
construction information will have an times given above. The documents may
inconsequential effect on motor vehicle AGENCY: National Highway Traffic also be viewed on the Internet at
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

safety because most consumers do not Safety Administration (NHTSA), http://www.regulations.gov by following
base tire purchases or vehicle operation Department of Transportation (DOT). the online instructions for accessing the
parameters on the number of plies in a ACTION: Receipt of petition. dockets. DOT’s complete Privacy Act
tire. Statement is available for review in the
The agency believes the SUMMARY: BMW of North America, LLC, Federal Register published on April 11,
noncompliance will have no (BMW) a subsidiary of BMW AG in 2000, (65 FR 19477–78).
measureable effect on the safety of tire Munich, Germany, has determined that The petition, supporting materials,
retread, repair and recycling industries. certain model year (MY) 2013 BMW 5 and all comments received before the

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:06 Jun 10, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00105 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM 11JNN1

Document Created: 2015-12-15 15:07:19
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 15:07:19

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
Action		Grant of petition.
FR Citation		80 FR 33331

80 FR 33331 - Continental Tire the Americas, LLC, Grant of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 112 (June 11, 2015)

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration