80 FR 36467 - List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks: NAC International, Inc., MAGNASTOR® System; Certificate of Compliance No. 1031, Amendment No. 5
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 122 (June 25, 2015)
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 122 (June 25, 2015)
| Page Range | 36467-36469 | |
| FR Document | 2015-15607 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 122 (Thursday, June 25, 2015)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 36467-36469] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-15607] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 10 CFR Part 72 [NRC-2014-0261] RIN 3150-AJ50 List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks: NAC International, Inc., MAGNASTOR[supreg] System; Certificate of Compliance No. 1031, Amendment No. 5 AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is confirming the effective date of June 29, 2015, for the direct final rule that was published in the Federal Register on April 15, 2015. This direct final rule amended the NRC's spent fuel storage regulations by revising the NAC International, Inc., MAGNASTOR[supreg] System listing within the ``List of approved spent fuel storage casks'' to include Amendment No. 5 to Certificate of Compliance (CoC) No. 1031. Amendment No. 5 makes numerous changes to the Technical Specifications (TSs) including adding a new damaged fuel assembly, revising the maximum or minimum enrichments for three fuel assembly designs, adding four-zone preferential loading for pressurized-water reactor fuel assemblies and increasing the maximum dose rates in limiting condition for operation (LCO) 3.3.1, and other editorial changes to Appendices A and B of the TSs. DATES: Effective Date: The effective date of June 29, 2015, for the direct final rule published April 15, 2015 (80 FR 20149), is confirmed. ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2014-0261 when contacting the NRC about the availability of information for this action. You may obtain publicly-available information related to this action by any of the following methods:Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2014-0261. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415- 3463; email: [email protected]. For technical questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the ADAMS Public Documents collection at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to [email protected]. The ADAMS accession number for each document referenced (if it is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time that it is mentioned in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section. NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O-1F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Solomon Sahle, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-3781; email: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Discussion On April 15, 2015 (80 FR 20149), the NRC published a direct final rule amending its regulations in Sec. 72.214 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) by revising the NAC International, Inc., MAGNASTOR[supreg] System listing within the ``List of approved spent fuel storage casks'' to include Amendment No. 5 to CoC No. 1031. Amendment No. 5 makes numerous changes to the TSs including adding a new damaged fuel assembly, revising the maximum or minimum enrichments for three fuel assembly designs, adding four-zone preferential loading for pressurized-water reactor fuel assemblies and increasing the maximum dose rates in LCO 3.3.1, and other editorial changes to Appendices A and B of the TSs. II. Public Comments on the Companion Proposed Rule In the direct final rule, the NRC stated that if no significant adverse comments were received, the direct final rule would become effective on June 29, 2015. The NRC received two identical public comments from private citizens on the companion proposed rule (80 FR 20171). Electronic copies of these comments can be obtained from the Federal rulemaking Web site, http://www.regulations.gov, by searching for Docket ID NRC-2014-0261. The comments also are available in ADAMS under Accession No. ML15147A691. For the reasons discussed in more detail in Section III, ``Public Comment Analysis,'' of this document, none of the comments received are considered significant adverse comments. III. Public Comment Analysis The NRC received two identical comments from private citizens on the proposed rule. As explained in the April 15, 2015, direct final rule (80 FR 20149), the NRC would withdraw the direct final rule only if it received a ``significant adverse comment.'' This is a comment where the commenter explains why the rule would be inappropriate, including challenges to the rule's underlying premise or approach, or would be ineffective or unacceptable without a change. A comment is adverse and significant if: (1) The comment opposes the rule and provides a reason sufficient to require a substantive response in a notice-and-comment process. For example, a substantive response is required when: [[Page 36468]] (a) The comment causes the NRC staff to reevaluate (or reconsider) its position or conduct additional analysis; (b) The comment raises an issue serious enough to warrant a substantive response to clarify or complete the record; or (c) The comment raises a relevant issue that was not previously addressed or considered by the NRC staff. (2) The comment proposes a change or an addition to the rule, and it is apparent that the rule would be ineffective or unacceptable without incorporation of the change or addition. (3) The comment causes the NRC staff to make a change (other than editorial) to the rule, CoC, or TSs. The NRC determined that none of the comments submitted on this direct final rule met any of these criteria. The comments either were already addressed in the NRC staff's safety evaluation report (SER) (ADAMS Accession No. ML14216A310), were beyond the scope of this rulemaking, or failed to provide a reason sufficient to require a substantive response in a notice-and-comment rulemaking. The NRC has not made any changes to the direct final rule as a result of the public comments. However, the NRC is taking this opportunity to respond to the individual comments to clarify information about the CoC rulemaking process. For rulemakings amending or revising a CoC, the scope of the rulemaking is limited to the specific changes requested by the applicant in the request for the amendment or amendment revision. Therefore, comments about the system, or spent fuel storage in general that are not applicable to the changes requested by the applicant are outside the scope of this rulemaking. Comments about details of the particular system that is the subject of the rulemaking, but that are not being addressed by the specific changes requested, have already been resolved in prior rulemakings. Persons who have questions or concerns about prior rulemakings and the resulting final rules may consider the NRC's process for petitions for rulemaking under 10 CFR 2.802, ``Petition for rulemaking.'' Additionally, safety concerns about any NRC-regulated activity may be reported to the NRC in accordance with the guidance posted on the NRC's public Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/allegations/safety-concern.html. This Web site provides information on how to notify the NRC of emergency or non-emergency issues. The NRC identified two overall issues raised in the two identical comments received, and the NRC's responses to these issues follow. Issue 1: Increased Dose Rate Around the Storage Cask The commenter stated that it is unacceptable and unnecessary to increase dry cask exposure. The commenter stated that the exposure should be decreasing instead of increasing by 26 percent. By referencing a Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation (BEIR) report, the commenter stated that 120 mrem per hour gives whoever or whatever is around the dry cask for 1 year over 100 percent chance of cancer or leukemia. The commenter also stated that it is impossible to have 450 mrem per hour on top of the dry cask without a similar dose surrounding it; and that such dose does not meet as low as is reasonably achievable requirements and impacts not just people, but animals, too. The commenter suggested counting all casks together in determining dose, rather than just using a single cask, as indicated in Revision 1 of NUREG-1536, ``Standard Review Plan for Dry Cask Storage Systems'' (ADAMS Accession No. ML101040620). The commenter noted that variations in cask emissions always appear to add up to the required dose at the fence line. NRC Response These comments are not within the scope of this specific rulemaking. This rulemaking is limited to the addition of Amendment No. 5 to CoC No. 1031 for the MAGNASTOR[supreg] System. This rulemaking does not propose any change in the standards for approval of a CoC or to the guidance documents (such as NUREG-1536) that are used to guide review of the CoC applications. The regulations in 10 CFR part 72 for approval of a CoC require the applicant to demonstrate that storage of spent fuel will not result in an annual dose beyond the established regulatory limits for an individual located beyond the site boundary. (See 10 CFR 72.104). Therefore, even though the changes included in Amendment No. 5 increase the dose rate on the surface of the canister, the amendment was found to be in compliance with 10 CFR part 72 because, as documented in Section 5.0 of the NRC staff's SER (ADAMS Accession No. ML14216A310), the certificate holder demonstrated that the potential dose at the site boundary would remain below regulatory limits. Moreover, storage casks that will be loaded or stored under Amendment No. 5 to the MAGNASTOR[supreg] System are only authorized for use under a general license to power reactor licensees. These licensees are subject to a number of other regulatory requirements that limit exposure from the spent fuel in the casks through regulations that directly limit access to the casks and limit dose to workers or members of the public located on site at a nuclear power plant. (See 10 CFR parts 20 and 73). Therefore, any general licensee that uses this cask system is subject to additional regulatory requirements that ensure dose rates to individuals on site remain within regulatory limits. Those additional regulatory requirements that apply to the general licensee are not, however, part of this rulemaking, but are beyond its scope. Issue 2: Bollards and Earthquake Protection The commenter stated that replacing real earthquake-proof engineering with bollards is not acceptable, as they might puncture holes in the dry casks. The commenter suggested developing other ways to earthquake-proof already filled casks such as anchors, dampers, or other means. The commenter also suggested making all new casks earthquake-proof, for the maximum earthquake anywhere. NRC Response The safety issue regarding the use of bollards was addressed by the NRC staff in its SER, and the commenter does not raise any additional information that would alter the staff's determination that Amendment No. 5 to the MAGNASTOR[supreg] System, when used within the requirements of the proposed CoC, will safely store spent fuel. Amendment No. 5 includes a specific TS to address this issue, TS 4.3.1(i) (ADAMS Accession No. ML14216A257), which requires a general licensee using the system under this amendment to evaluate the impact of the bollards on the storage cask using that site's design-basis earthquake. The TS requires the licensee's analysis to demonstrate that any damage to the storage cask from the bollards when analyzed using the site's specific design-basis earthquake, is bounded by the applicant's analysis of a non-mechanistic tipover event contained in the final safety analysis report. (See Section 3 of the NRC staff's SER (ADAMS Accession No. ML14216A310)). As to the general comments raising concerns with the regulatory requirements and process in 10 CFR part 72 for evaluating seismic issues in the CoC application, those comments are beyond the scope of this rulemaking which is limited to the addition of Amendment No. 5 to CoC No. 1031 for the MAGNASTOR[supreg] System. Persons who have questions or concerns about prior rulemakings and the resulting final [[Page 36469]] rules may consider the NRC's process for petitions for rulemaking under 10 CFR 2.802. Therefore, the NRC staff has concluded that the comments received on the companion proposed rule for Amendment No. 5 to CoC No. 1031 for the MAGNASTOR[supreg] System are not significant adverse comments as defined in NUREG/BR-0053, Revision 6, ``United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regulations Handbook'' (ADAMS Accession No. ML052720461). Therefore, this rule will become effective as scheduled. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 22nd day of June, 2015. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Cindy Bladey, Chief, Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch, Division of Administrative Services, Office of Administration. [FR Doc. 2015-15607 Filed 6-24-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 122 / Thursday, June 25, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 36467
Executive Orders 12866, 12988, 13175, MAGNASTOR® System listing within 301–415–3781; email: Solomon.Sahle@
and 13563; the Paperwork Reduction the ‘‘List of approved spent fuel storage nrc.gov.
Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35); and the casks’’ to include Amendment No. 5 to SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E-Gov Act (44 U.S.C. 101). Certificate of Compliance (CoC) No.
After consideration of all relevant 1031. Amendment No. 5 makes I. Discussion
material presented, it is found that numerous changes to the Technical On April 15, 2015 (80 FR 20149), the
finalizing the interim rule, without Specifications (TSs) including adding a NRC published a direct final rule
change, as published in the Federal new damaged fuel assembly, revising amending its regulations in § 72.214 of
Register (80 FR 15673, March 25, 2015) the maximum or minimum enrichments Title 10 of the Code of Federal
will tend to effectuate the declared for three fuel assembly designs, adding Regulations (10 CFR) by revising the
policy of the Act. four-zone preferential loading for NAC International, Inc., MAGNASTOR®
pressurized-water reactor fuel System listing within the ‘‘List of
List of Subjects
assemblies and increasing the maximum approved spent fuel storage casks’’ to
7 CFR Part 944 dose rates in limiting condition for include Amendment No. 5 to CoC No.
Avocados, Food grades and standards, operation (LCO) 3.3.1, and other 1031. Amendment No. 5 makes
Grapefruit, Grapes, Imports, Kiwifruit, editorial changes to Appendices A and numerous changes to the TSs including
Limes, Olives, Oranges. B of the TSs. adding a new damaged fuel assembly,
DATES: Effective Date: The effective date revising the maximum or minimum
7 CFR Part 980 of June 29, 2015, for the direct final rule enrichments for three fuel assembly
Food grades and standards, Imports, published April 15, 2015 (80 FR 20149), designs, adding four-zone preferential
Marketing agreements, Onions, Potatoes, is confirmed. loading for pressurized-water reactor
Tomatoes. ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID fuel assemblies and increasing the
NRC–2014–0261 when contacting the maximum dose rates in LCO 3.3.1, and
7 CFR Part 999
NRC about the availability of other editorial changes to Appendices A
Dates, Filberts, Food grades and information for this action. You may and B of the TSs.
standards, Imports, Nuts, Prunes, obtain publicly-available information
Raisins, Reporting and recordkeeping II. Public Comments on the Companion
related to this action by any of the Proposed Rule
requirements, Walnuts. following methods:
Accordingly, the interim rule that • Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to In the direct final rule, the NRC stated
amended 7 CFR parts 944, 980, and 999 http://www.regulations.gov and search that if no significant adverse comments
that was published at 80 FR 15673 on for Docket ID NRC–2014–0261. Address were received, the direct final rule
March 25, 2015, is adopted as a final questions about NRC dockets to Carol would become effective on June 29,
rule, without change. Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463; 2015. The NRC received two identical
Dated: June 18, 2015. email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For public comments from private citizens
technical questions, contact the on the companion proposed rule (80 FR
Rex A. Barnes,
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER 20171). Electronic copies of these
Associate Administrator, Agricultural comments can be obtained from the
Marketing Service. INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document. Federal rulemaking Web site, http://
[FR Doc. 2015–15386 Filed 6–24–15; 8:45 am]
www.regulations.gov, by searching for
BILLING CODE P • NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Docket ID NRC–2014–0261. The
Access and Management System
comments also are available in ADAMS
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-
under Accession No. ML15147A691.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY available documents online in the
For the reasons discussed in more detail
COMMISSION ADAMS Public Documents collection at
in Section III, ‘‘Public Comment
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
Analysis,’’ of this document, none of the
10 CFR Part 72 adams.html. To begin the search, select
comments received are considered
‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
[NRC–2014–0261] significant adverse comments.
select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
RIN 3150–AJ50 Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS, III. Public Comment Analysis
please contact the NRC’s Public The NRC received two identical
List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Document Room (PDR) reference staff at comments from private citizens on the
Casks: NAC International, Inc., 1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by proposed rule. As explained in the April
MAGNASTOR® System; Certificate of email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The 15, 2015, direct final rule (80 FR 20149),
Compliance No. 1031, Amendment ADAMS accession number for each the NRC would withdraw the direct
No. 5 document referenced (if it is available in final rule only if it received a
ADAMS) is provided the first time that ‘‘significant adverse comment.’’ This is
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory
it is mentioned in the SUPPLEMENTARY a comment where the commenter
Commission.
INFORMATION section.
ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of explains why the rule would be
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and inappropriate, including challenges to
effective date. purchase copies of public documents at the rule’s underlying premise or
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory the NRC’s PDR, Room O–1F21, One approach, or would be ineffective or
Commission (NRC) is confirming the White Flint North, 11555 Rockville unacceptable without a change. A
Lhorne on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
effective date of June 29, 2015, for the Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. comment is adverse and significant if:
direct final rule that was published in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (1) The comment opposes the rule and
the Federal Register on April 15, 2015. Solomon Sahle, Office of Nuclear provides a reason sufficient to require a
This direct final rule amended the Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. substantive response in a notice-and-
NRC’s spent fuel storage regulations by Nuclear Regulatory Commission, comment process. For example, a
revising the NAC International, Inc., Washington, DC 20555–0001; telephone: substantive response is required when:
VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:54 Jun 24, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\25JNR1.SGM 25JNR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_36589/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 122 / Thursday, June 25, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 36469
rules may consider the NRC’s process Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft operation of the therapeutic system as a
for petitions for rulemaking under 10 Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue means by which to reserve the
CFR 2.802. SW., Renton, Washington, 98057–3356; minimum supply of supplemental
Therefore, the NRC staff has telephone 425–227–2683; facsimile passenger oxygen.
concluded that the comments received 425–227–1320.
Type Certification Basis
on the companion proposed rule for SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Amendment No. 5 to CoC No. 1031 for Under the provisions of § 21.101, L–
the MAGNASTOR® System are not Background 3 Communications must show that the
significant adverse comments as defined On May 10, 2011, L–3 Boeing Model 747–8 series airplanes, as
in NUREG/BR–0053, Revision 6, Communications applied for a changed, continue to meet the
‘‘United States Nuclear Regulatory supplemental type certificate (STC) for applicable provisions of the regulations
Commission Regulations Handbook’’ therapeutic oxygen for medical use in listed in Type Certificate No. A20WE, or
(ADAMS Accession No. ML052720461). the Boeing Model 747–8 series airplanes the applicable regulations in effect on
Therefore, this rule will become equipped with executive interiors. The the date of application for the change,
effective as scheduled. Boeing Model 747–8 series airplane, except for earlier amendments as agreed
which is a derivative of the Boeing upon by the FAA.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 22nd
day of June, 2015. Model 747–400 airplane currently If the Administrator finds that the
approved under Type Certificate No. applicable airworthiness regulations
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
A20WE, is a four-engine jet transport (i.e., Title 14, Code of Federal
Cindy Bladey, Regulations (14 CFR) part 25) do not
airplane that will have a maximum
Chief, Rules, Announcements, and Directives takeoff weight of 970,000 lbs. The contain adequate or appropriate safety
Branch, Division of Administrative Services, Model 747–8 airplane will have 153 standards for the Boeing Model 747–8
Office of Administration.
seats approved for taxi, takeoff, and series airplanes because of a novel or
[FR Doc. 2015–15607 Filed 6–24–15; 8:45 am]
landing (19 crewmembers and 134 unusual design feature, special
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P passengers). conditions are prescribed under the
Section 25.1445 includes standards provisions of § 21.16.
for oxygen distribution systems when Special conditions are initially
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION oxygen is supplied to flightcrew and applicable to the model for which they
passengers. If a common source of are issued. Should the applicant apply
Federal Aviation Administration supply is used, § 25.1445(a)(2) requires for a supplemental type certificate to
a means to separately reserve the modify any other model included on the
14 CFR Part 25 minimum supply required by the same type certificate to incorporate the
[Docket No. FAA–2015–0758; Special flightcrew. This requirement was same or similar novel or unusual design
Conditions No. 25–586–SC] included in § 25.1445 when the feature, these special conditions would
regulations were codified, and was also apply to the other model under
Special Conditions: L–3 originally added to Civil Air Regulations § 21.101.
Communications Integrated Systems, 4b.831 at Amendment 4b–13, effective In addition to the applicable
Boeing Model 747–8 Series Airplanes; September 21, 1949. airworthiness regulations and special
Therapeutic Oxygen for Medical Use It is apparent that the regulation is conditions, the Boeing Model 747–8
intended to protect the flightcrew by series airplanes must comply with the
AGENCY: Federal Aviation ensuring that an adequate supply of fuel vent and exhaust emission
Administration (FAA), DOT. oxygen is available to complete a requirements of 14 CFR part 34; and the
ACTION: Final special conditions. descent and landing following a loss of noise certification requirements of 14
cabin pressure. When the regulation was CFR part 36.
SUMMARY: These special conditions are
written, the only passenger oxygen The FAA issues special conditions, as
issued for the Boeing Model 747–8
system designs were supplemental defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in accordance
series airplanes. These airplanes, as
oxygen systems intended to protect with § 11.38, and they become part of
modified by L–3 Communications
passengers from hypoxia in the event of the type certification basis under
Integrated Systems (L–3
a decompression. Existing passenger § 21.101.
Communications), will have a novel or
oxygen systems did not include design
unusual design feature when compared features that would allow the flightcrew Novel or Unusual Design Features
to the state of technology envisioned in to control oxygen to passengers during The L–3 Communications
the airworthiness standards for flight. There are no similar requirements modifications to the Boeing Model 747–
transport category airplanes. This design when oxygen is supplied from the same 8 series airplanes will incorporate the
feature is therapeutic oxygen for source to passengers for use during a following novel or unusual design
medical use installed in an executive- decompression and for discretionary/ feature:
interior airplane. The applicable first-aid use any time during the flight. L–3 Communications is seeking
airworthiness regulations do not contain In the proposed design, the passenger certification of an interior modification
adequate or appropriate safety standards and therapeutic oxygen systems use the to Boeing Model 747–8 series airplanes
for this design feature. These special same source of oxygen. The flightcrew to include executive and medical
conditions contain the additional safety oxygen emergency system uses a patient transport. As a part of the
standards that the Administrator dedicated source of oxygen independent executive interior installation, the
considers necessary to establish a level from the passenger oxygen system. An airplane will be outfitted with a
Lhorne on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
of safety equivalent to that established oxygen duration chart and operation therapeutic oxygen system. The
by the existing airworthiness standards. procedures will be incorporated into the therapeutic oxygen system shares the
DATES: Effective June 25, 2015. ‘‘Flight Crew Operating Manual’’ and same supply of oxygen with the existing
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: ‘‘Flight Manual Supplement,’’ as part of passenger oxygen system and consists of
Robert Hettman, FAA, Propulsion and the STC, to provide information to the multiple constant flow oxygen outlets
Mechanical Systems, ANM–112, flightcrew to determine when to cease located throughout the cabin. The
VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:54 Jun 24, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\25JNR1.SGM 25JNR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_36589/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-15 14:16:42
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 14:16:42
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date. | |
| Contact | Solomon Sahle, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-3781; email: [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 36467 | |
| RIN Number | 3150-AJ50 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR