80 FR 38665 - Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 129 (July 7, 2015)

Page Range		38665-38667
FR Document		2015-16647

The Department of Commerce (Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on tapered roller bearings and parts thereof, finished and unfinished (TRBs), from the People's Republic of China (PRC). The administrative review covers four exporters, of which the Department selected two mandatory respondents for individual examination (i.e., Changshan Peer Bearing Co. Ltd. (CPZ/ SKF); and Yantai CMC Bearing Co., Ltd. (Yantai CMC)). The period of review (POR) is June 1, 2013, through May 31, 2014. We preliminarily determine that sales of subject merchandise have been made below normal value (NV). In addition, we preliminarily determine, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.401(f), to treat affiliated producers, CPZ/SKF and Shanghai General Bearing Co., Ltd. (SGBC) as a single entity.\1\ If these preliminary results are adopted in the final results of this review, we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 129 (Tuesday, July 7, 2015)

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 129 (Tuesday, July 7, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38665-38667]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-16647]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-601]


Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and 
Unfinished, From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Department) is conducting an 
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on tapered roller 
bearings and parts thereof, finished and unfinished (TRBs), from the 
People's Republic of China (PRC). The administrative review covers four 
exporters, of which the Department selected two mandatory respondents 
for individual examination (i.e., Changshan Peer Bearing Co. Ltd. (CPZ/
SKF); and Yantai CMC Bearing Co., Ltd. (Yantai CMC)). The period of 
review (POR) is June 1, 2013, through May 31, 2014.
    We preliminarily determine that sales of subject merchandise have 
been made below normal value (NV). In addition, we preliminarily 
determine, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.401(f), to treat affiliated 
producers, CPZ/SKF and Shanghai General Bearing Co., Ltd. (SGBC) as a 
single entity.\1\ If these preliminary results are adopted in the final 
results of this review, we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate 
entries. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary 
results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The collapsed entity is hereinafter referred to as CPZ/SGBC. 
For further discussion, see memorandum from The Team to Melissa 
Skinner, Director Office II, dated June 30, 2015, entitled ``Whether 
to Collapse Changshan Peer Bearing Company Ltd. and Shanghai General 
Bearing Company Ltd. in the 2013-2014 Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review of Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, 
Finished and Unfinished, from the People's Republic of China,'' 
(Collapsing Memorandum).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: July 7, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen Bailey or Blaine Wiltse, 
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0193 or (202) 482-6345, 
respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by the order includes tapered roller 
bearings. The subject merchandise is currently classifiable under 
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings: 
8482.20.00, 8482.91.00.50, 8482.99.15, 8482.99.45, 8483.20.40, 
8483.20.80, 8483.30.80, 8483.90.20, 8483.90.30, 8483.90.80, 
8708.70.6060, 8708.99.2300, 8708.99.4850, 8708.99.6890, 8708.99.8115, 
and 8708.99.8180. The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience 
and customs purposes only; the written description of the scope of the 
order is dispositive.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ For a complete description of the scope of the order, see 
memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, dated June 30, 
2015 entitled ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of 
the 2013-2014 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Tapered 
Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, from the 
People's Republic of China'' (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), 
issued concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Methodology

    The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section 
751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). As noted 
above, there are two mandatory respondents in this administrative 
review: CPZ/SGBC and Yantai CMC. For CPZ/SGBC, we calculated 
constructed export prices in accordance with section 772 of the Act.

[[Page 38666]]

Because the PRC is a non-market economy (NME) within the meaning of 
section 771(18) of the Act, normal value has been calculated in 
accordance with section 773(c) of the Act.
    For Yantai CMC, we preliminarily find that this respondent is 
ineligible for a separate rate because it has failed to demonstrate an 
absence of de facto government control in this administrative review. 
Therefore, we did not calculate a separate margin for Yantai CMC.
    For a full description of the methodology underlying our 
conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically 
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 
registered users at http://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records 
Unit, room B0824 of the main Department of Commerce building. In 
addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can 
be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. 
The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic version 
of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. A list 
of the topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is 
attached as the Appendix to this notice.

Rate for Non-Examined Companies Which Are Eligible for a Separate Rate

    The statute and the Department's regulations do not address the 
establishment of the rate applied to individual respondents not 
selected for individual examination when the Department limits its 
examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) 
of the Act. Generally, the Department looks to section 735(c)(5) of the 
Act, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in 
an investigation, for guidance when calculating the rate for separate-
rate respondents that are not examined individually in an 
administrative review. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act notes a 
preference that we are not to calculate an all-others rate using rates 
for individually-examined respondents which are zero, de minimis, or 
based entirely on facts available. Section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act 
provides that, where all rates are zero, de minimis, or based entirely 
on facts available, the Department may use ``any reasonable method'' 
for assigning a rate to non-examined respondents.
    For these preliminary results, we calculated a margin of zero 
percent for CPZ/SGBC. Therefore, we preliminarily determine that the 
application of the rate from the previous administrative review to the 
non-examined separate-rate companies is consistent with precedent \3\ 
and the most appropriate method to determine the separate rate in the 
instant review. Pursuant to this method, we are preliminarily assigning 
the margin of 0.65 percent, the most recent margin calculated for the 
non-examined separate-rate respondents,\4\ to the non-examined 
separate-rate respondents in the instant review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From the People's 
Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Preliminary Partial 
Rescission of Fifth Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 
8338, 8342 (February 14, 2011), unchanged in Administrative Review 
of Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From the People's Republic of 
China: Final Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review, 76 FR 51940 (August 19, 2011).
    \4\ This margin is from the 2012-2013 administrative review. See 
Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, 
From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of the 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Results of the New 
Shipper Review; 2012-2013, 80 FR 4244 (January 27, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preliminary Results of Review

    Because Yantai CMC did not demonstrate that it was entitled to a 
separate rate, the Department preliminarily finds Yantai CMC to be part 
of the PRC-wide entity.\5\ The rate previously established for the PRC-
wide entity is 92.84 percent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum, at 8-9. Pursuant to the 
Department's change in practice, the Department no longer considers 
the NME entity as an exporter conditionally subject to 
administrative reviews. See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of 
Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in 
Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket 
Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963, 
65970 (November 4, 2013). Under this practice, the NME entity will 
not be under review unless a party specifically requests, or the 
Department self-initiates, a review of the entity. Because no party 
requested a review of the entity, the entity is not under review and 
the entity's rate is not subject to change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department preliminarily determines that the following 
weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period June 1, 2013, 
through May 31, 2014:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              Weighted-average percent
                 Exporters                             margin
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Changshan Peer Bearing Co., Ltd./Shanghai   0.00 Percent.
 General Bearing Co., Ltd.
Xinchang Kaiyuan Automotive Bearing Co.,    0.65 Percent.
 Ltd.*.
Ningbo Xinglun Bearings Import & Export     0.65 Percent.
 Co., Ltd.*.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* This company demonstrated that it qualified for a separate rate in
  this administrative review.

Disclosure and Public Comment

    The Department will disclose calculations performed for these 
preliminary results to the parties within five days of the date of 
publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 
Interested parties may submit case briefs no later than 30 days after 
the date of publication of these preliminary results of review.\6\ 
Rebuttals to case briefs may be filed no later than five days after 
case briefs are filed and all rebuttal briefs must be limited to 
comments raised in the case briefs. Parties who submit comments are 
requested to submit with the argument: (1) A statement of the issue; 
(2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\  See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii).
    \7\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any interested party may request a hearing within 30 days of 
publication of this notice.\8\ Hearing requests should contain the 
following information: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone 
number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of the issues to 
be discussed. Oral presentations will be limited to issues raised in 
the briefs.\9\ If a request for a hearing is made, parties will be 
notified of the time and date for the hearing to be held at the U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20230.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
    \9\ Id.
    \10\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    All submissions, with limited exceptions, must be filed 
electronically using ACCESS. An electronically filed document must be 
received successfully in its entirety by 5 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) on 
the due date. Documents excepted from the electronic submission 
requirements must be filed manually (i.e., in paper form) with the APO/
Dockets Unit in Room 18022 and stamped with the date and time of 
receipt by 5 p.m. ET on the due date.
    Unless otherwise extended, the Department intends to issue the 
final results of this administrative review, which will include the 
results of its analysis of all issues raised in the case briefs, within 
120 days of publication of these preliminary results, pursuant to 
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.

[[Page 38667]]

Assessment Rates

    Upon issuance of the final results, the Department will determine, 
and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries 
covered by this review.\11\ The Department intends to issue assessment 
instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication of the final results 
of this review. For each individually-examined respondent in this 
review (i.e., CPZ/SGBC) which has a weighted-average dumping margin 
which is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), we will 
calculate importer-specific assessment rates based on the ratio of the 
total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales to 
the total entered value of those sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1).\12\ Where either the respondent's weighted-average 
dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer-specific ad 
valorem dumping margin is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to 
liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
    \12\ In these preliminary results, the Department applied the 
assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping 
Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final 
Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). The Department will 
limit the application of this assessment rate to CPZ/SKF's entries 
of subject merchandise because SGBC's entries were not subject to 
the antidumping duty order on TRBs during the POR. For further 
discussion, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the respondents which were not selected for individual 
examination in this administrative review and which qualified for a 
separate rate, the assessment rate will be equal to the dumping margin 
assigned to the non-examined separate-rate companies in the 2012-2013 
administrative review of TRBs from the PRC.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See ``Rate for Non-Examined Companies Which Are Eligible 
for a Separate Rate'' section, above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the final results, if we continue to treat Yantai CMC as part 
of the PRC-wide entity, we will instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem 
assessment rate of 92.84 percent to all entries of subject merchandise 
during the POR which were exported by Yantai CMC.
    For entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales databases 
submitted by companies individually examined during this review, the 
Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide 
rate. In addition, if the Department determines that an exporter under 
review had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended 
entries that entered under that exporter's case number (i.e., at that 
exporter's rate) will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market 
Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as 
provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the exporters 
listed above which have a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be 
the rate established in the final results of this review (except, if 
the rate is zero or de minimis, then a cash deposit rate of zero will 
be established for that company); (2) for previously investigated or 
reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above that have separate 
rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific 
rate published for the most recently completed segment of this 
proceeding; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have 
not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate 
will be the rate for the PRC-wide entity, 92.84 percent; and (4) for 
all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received 
their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to 
the PRC exporter(s) that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit 
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further 
notice.

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of 
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.
    We are issuing and publishing these preliminary results of review 
in accordance with sections 751(a)(l) and 777(i)(l) of the Act, and 19 
CFR 351.221(b)(4).

    Dated: June 30, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum

1. Summary
2. Background
3. Scope of the Order
4. Discussion of the Methodology
    a. Non-Market Economy Country
    b. Separate Rates
    c. Separate Rate for Non-Selected Companies
    d. Collapsing of CPZ With Another Producer of TRBs
    e. Surrogate Country
    f. Date of Sale
    g. Normal Value Comparisons
5. Conclusion

[FR Doc. 2015-16647 Filed 7-6-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

38666 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 129 / Tuesday, July 7, 2015 / Notices

Because the PRC is a non-market method’’ for assigning a rate to non- Weighted-av-
economy (NME) within the meaning of examined respondents. Exporters erage percent
section 771(18) of the Act, normal value For these preliminary results, we margin
has been calculated in accordance with calculated a margin of zero percent for
CPZ/SGBC. Therefore, we preliminarily Ningbo Xinglun Bearings Im- 0.65 Percent.
section 773(c) of the Act. port & Export Co., Ltd.*.
For Yantai CMC, we preliminarily determine that the application of the
find that this respondent is ineligible for rate from the previous administrative * This company demonstrated that it quali-
review to the non-examined separate- fied for a separate rate in this administrative
a separate rate because it has failed to review.
demonstrate an absence of de facto rate companies is consistent with
government control in this precedent 3 and the most appropriate Disclosure and Public Comment
administrative review. Therefore, we method to determine the separate rate in
The Department will disclose
did not calculate a separate margin for the instant review. Pursuant to this
calculations performed for these
Yantai CMC. method, we are preliminarily assigning
preliminary results to the parties within
For a full description of the the margin of 0.65 percent, the most
five days of the date of publication of
methodology underlying our recent margin calculated for the non-
this notice in accordance with 19 CFR
conclusions, see the Preliminary examined separate-rate respondents,4 to
351.224(b). Interested parties may
Decision Memorandum. The the non-examined separate-rate
submit case briefs no later than 30 days
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a respondents in the instant review.
after the date of publication of these
public document and is on file Preliminary Results of Review preliminary results of review.6 Rebuttals
electronically via Enforcement and Because Yantai CMC did not to case briefs may be filed no later than
Compliance’s Antidumping and demonstrate that it was entitled to a five days after case briefs are filed and
Countervailing Duty Centralized separate rate, the Department all rebuttal briefs must be limited to
Electronic Service System (ACCESS). preliminarily finds Yantai CMC to be comments raised in the case briefs.
ACCESS is available to registered users part of the PRC-wide entity.5 The rate Parties who submit comments are
at http://access.trade.gov and in the previously established for the PRC-wide requested to submit with the argument:
Central Records Unit, room B0824 of the entity is 92.84 percent. (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief
main Department of Commerce The Department preliminarily summary of the argument; and (3) a
building. In addition, a complete determines that the following weighted- table of authorities.7
version of the Preliminary Decision average dumping margins exist for the Any interested party may request a
Memorandum can be accessed directly period June 1, 2013, through May 31, hearing within 30 days of publication of
at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/ 2014: this notice.8 Hearing requests should
index.html. The signed Preliminary contain the following information: (1)
Decision Memorandum and the Weighted-av- The party’s name, address, and
electronic version of the Preliminary Exporters erage percent telephone number; (2) the number of
Decision Memorandum are identical in margin participants; and (3) a list of the issues
content. A list of the topics discussed in to be discussed. Oral presentations will
Changshan Peer Bearing 0.00 Percent. be limited to issues raised in the briefs.9
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum Co., Ltd./Shanghai General
is attached as the Appendix to this Bearing Co., Ltd.
If a request for a hearing is made, parties
notice. Xinchang Kaiyuan Auto- 0.65 Percent. will be notified of the time and date for
motive Bearing Co., Ltd.*. the hearing to be held at the U.S.
Rate for Non-Examined Companies Department of Commerce, 14th Street
Which Are Eligible for a Separate Rate 3 See e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp and Constitution Avenue NW.,
The statute and the Department’s From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Washington, DC 20230.10
regulations do not address the
Results and Preliminary Partial Rescission of Fifth All submissions, with limited
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR exceptions, must be filed electronically
establishment of the rate applied to 8338, 8342 (February 14, 2011), unchanged in
individual respondents not selected for Administrative Review of Certain Frozen using ACCESS. An electronically filed
individual examination when the Warmwater Shrimp From the People’s Republic of document must be received successfully
China: Final Results and Partial Rescission of in its entirety by 5 p.m. Eastern Time
Department limits its examination in an Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR
administrative review pursuant to 51940 (August 19, 2011).
(ET) on the due date. Documents
section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, 4 This margin is from the 2012–2013 excepted from the electronic submission
administrative review. See Tapered Roller Bearings requirements must be filed manually
the Department looks to section and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, From (i.e., in paper form) with the APO/
735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the
Dockets Unit in Room 18022 and
instructions for calculating the all- Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Final Results of the New Shipper Review; 2012– stamped with the date and time of
others rate in an investigation, for
2013, 80 FR 4244 (January 27, 2015). receipt by 5 p.m. ET on the due date.
guidance when calculating the rate for 5 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum, at 8–9. Unless otherwise extended, the
separate-rate respondents that are not Pursuant to the Department’s change in practice, Department intends to issue the final
examined individually in an the Department no longer considers the NME entity
results of this administrative review,
administrative review. Section as an exporter conditionally subject to
administrative reviews. See Antidumping which will include the results of its
735(c)(5)(A) of the Act notes a Proceedings: Announcement of Change in analysis of all issues raised in the case
preference that we are not to calculate Department Practice for Respondent Selection in briefs, within 120 days of publication of
an all-others rate using rates for Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional
these preliminary results, pursuant to
Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

individually-examined respondents section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963,
which are zero, de minimis, or based 65970 (November 4, 2013). Under this practice, the
entirely on facts available. Section NME entity will not be under review unless a party 6 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii).
735(c)(5)(B) of the Act provides that, specifically requests, or the Department self- 7 See
initiates, a review of the entity. Because no party 19 CFR 351.309(d).
where all rates are zero, de minimis, or requested a review of the entity, the entity is not
8 See 19 CFR 351.310(c).

based entirely on facts available, the under review and the entity’s rate is not subject to 9 Id.

Department may use ‘‘any reasonable change. 10 See 19 CFR 351.310(d).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:31 Jul 06, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM 07JYN1

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 129 / Tuesday, July 7, 2015 / Notices 38667

Assessment Rates exporter’s rate) will be liquidated at the Dated: June 30, 2015.
Upon issuance of the final results, the PRC-wide rate.14 Paul Piquado,
Department will determine, and CBP Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Cash Deposit Requirements Compliance.
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this The following cash deposit Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in
review.11 The Department intends to requirements will be effective upon the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 publication of the final results of this 1. Summary
days after the publication of the final administrative review for all shipments 2. Background
results of this review. For each of the subject merchandise entered, or 3. Scope of the Order
individually-examined respondent in withdrawn from warehouse, for 4. Discussion of the Methodology
this review (i.e., CPZ/SGBC) which has consumption on or after the publication a. Non-Market Economy Country
a weighted-average dumping margin b. Separate Rates
date, as provided for by section
which is not zero or de minimis (i.e., c. Separate Rate for Non-Selected
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the Companies
less than 0.5 percent), we will calculate exporters listed above which have a d. Collapsing of CPZ With Another
importer-specific assessment rates based
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will Producer of TRBs
on the ratio of the total amount of e. Surrogate Country
be the rate established in the final
dumping calculated for the importer’s f. Date of Sale
results of this review (except, if the rate
examined sales to the total entered g. Normal Value Comparisons
value of those sales, in accordance with is zero or de minimis, then a cash 5. Conclusion
19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).12 Where either deposit rate of zero will be established
[FR Doc. 2015–16647 Filed 7–6–15; 8:45 am]
the respondent’s weighted-average for that company); (2) for previously
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
dumping margin is zero or de minimis, investigated or reviewed PRC and non-
or an importer-specific ad valorem PRC exporters not listed above that have
dumping margin is zero or de minimis, separate rates, the cash deposit rate will DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
we will instruct CBP to liquidate the continue to be the exporter-specific rate
appropriate entries without regard to published for the most recently International Trade Administration
antidumping duties. completed segment of this proceeding; [A–570–831]
For the respondents which were not (3) for all PRC exporters of subject
selected for individual examination in merchandise that have not been found Fresh Garlic From the People’s
this administrative review and which to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash Republic of China: Final Results of the
qualified for a separate rate, the deposit rate will be the rate for the PRC- Changed Circumstances Review of
assessment rate will be equal to the wide entity, 92.84 percent; and (4) for Lanling Qingshui Vegetable Foods Co.,
dumping margin assigned to the non- all non-PRC exporters of subject Ltd.
examined separate-rate companies in merchandise which have not received
the 2012–2013 administrative review of AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
their own rate, the cash deposit rate will International Trade Administration,
TRBs from the PRC.13 be the rate applicable to the PRC
For the final results, if we continue to Department of Commerce.
exporter(s) that supplied that non-PRC SUMMARY: On March 23, 2015, the
treat Yantai CMC as part of the PRC-
exporter. These deposit requirements, Department of Commerce (Department)
wide entity, we will instruct CBP to
when imposed, shall remain in effect published a notice of preliminary
apply an ad valorem assessment rate of
92.84 percent to all entries of subject until further notice. results of a changed circumstance
review (CCR) of the antidumping duty
merchandise during the POR which Notification to Importers (AD) order on fresh garlic from the
were exported by Yantai CMC.
For entries that were not reported in This notice also serves as a People’s Republic of China (PRC) 1 in
the U.S. sales databases submitted by preliminary reminder to importers of response to a request from Lanling
companies individually examined Qingshui Vegetable Foods Co., Ltd.
their responsibility under 19 CFR
during this review, the Department will (Qingshui), a producer/exporter of fresh
351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at and peeled garlic from the PRC.2
the reimbursement of antidumping Pursuant to section 751(b) of the Tariff
the PRC-wide rate. In addition, if the duties prior to liquidation of the Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and
Department determines that an exporter relevant entries during this review 19 CFR 351.216, the Department
under review had no shipments of the period. Failure to comply with this preliminarily determined that Qingshui
subject merchandise, any suspended requirement could result in the is the successor-in-interest to Cangshan
entries that entered under that Secretary’s presumption that Qingshui Vegetable Foods Co., Ltd.
exporter’s case number (i.e., at that reimbursement of antidumping duties (Cangshan Qingshui) for purposes of the
11 See
occurred and the subsequent assessment AD order on fresh garlic from the PRC,
19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
12 Inthese preliminary results, the Department
of double antidumping duties. and, as such, is entitled to Cangshan
applied the assessment rate calculation method We are issuing and publishing these Qingshui’s cash deposit rate with
adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation
preliminary results of review in respect to entries of subject
of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and merchandise. We invited interested
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping accordance with sections 751(a)(l) and
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 777(i)(l) of the Act, and 19 CFR parties to comment on the Preliminary
(February 14, 2012). The Department will limit the 351.221(b)(4).
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

application of this assessment rate to CPZ/SKF’s 1 See Antidumping Duty Order: Fresh Garlic from

entries of subject merchandise because SGBC’s the People’s Republic of China, 59 FR 59209
entries were not subject to the antidumping duty (November 16, 1994) (Order).
order on TRBs during the POR. For further 2 See Fresh Garlic from the People’s Republic of
14 For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-
discussion, see the Preliminary Decision China: Preliminary Results of the Changed
Memorandum. Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Circumstances Review of Lanling Qingshui
13 See ‘‘Rate for Non-Examined Companies Which Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 Vegetable Foods Co., Ltd., 80 FR 15192 (March 23,
Are Eligible for a Separate Rate’’ section, above. (October 24, 2011). 2015) (Preliminary Results).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:31 Jul 06, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM 07JYN1

Document Created: 2015-12-15 13:27:29
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 13:27:29

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
Contact		Stephen Bailey or Blaine Wiltse, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0193 or (202) 482-6345, respectively.
FR Citation		80 FR 38665

80 FR 38665 - Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCEInternational Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 129 (July 7, 2015)

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration