80_FR_39140 80 FR 39010 - Five-Year Review of the Oil Pipeline Index

80 FR 39010 - Five-Year Review of the Oil Pipeline Index

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 130 (July 8, 2015)

Page Range39010-39011
FR Document2015-16628

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) invites comments on its proposed five-year review of the index level used to determine annual changes to oil pipeline rate ceilings. The Commission proposes an index level between the Producer Price Index for Finished Goods (PPI-FG)+2.0 percent and PPI-FG+2.4 percent for the five-year period commencing July 1, 2016. The Commission invites interested persons to submit comments regarding this proposal and any alternative methodologies for calculating the index level.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 130 (Wednesday, July 8, 2015) 
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 130 (Wednesday, July 8, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 39010-39011]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-16628]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

18 CFR Part 342

[Docket No. RM15-20-000]


Five-Year Review of the Oil Pipeline Index

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of inquiry.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) invites 
comments on its proposed five-year review of the index level used to 
determine annual changes to oil pipeline rate ceilings. The Commission 
proposes an index level between the Producer Price Index for Finished 
Goods (PPI-FG)+2.0 percent and PPI-FG+2.4 percent for the five-year 
period commencing July 1, 2016. The Commission invites interested 
persons to submit comments regarding this proposal and any alternative 
methodologies for calculating the index level.

DATES: Initial Comments are due August 24, 2015, and Reply Comments are 
due September 21, 2015.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number by any 
of the following methods:
     Agency Web site: http://www.ferc.gov. Documents created 
electronically using word processing software should be filed in native 
applications or print-to-PDF format and not in a scanned format. All 
supporting workpapers must be submitted with formulas and in a 
spreadsheet format acceptable under the Commission's eFiling rules.
     Mail/Hand Delivery: Commenters unable to file comments 
electronically must mail or hand deliver an original to: Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, Office of the Secretary, 888 First Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20426.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 
    Monil Patel (Technical Information); Office of Energy Market 
Regulation; Federal Energy Regulatory Commission; 888 First Street NE.; 
Washington, DC 20426; (202) 502-8296; Andrew Knudsen (Legal 
Information); Office of the General Counsel; Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission; 888 First Street NE.; Washington, DC 20426; (202) 502-6527.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    1. The Commission annually applies an index to existing oil 
pipeline transportation rate ceilings to establish new rate ceiling 
levels. The Commission reexamines this index every five years.\1\ In 
this notice of inquiry (NOI), the Commission invites comments on its 
proposal to use an index level between the Producer Price Index for 
Finished Goods \2\ (PPI-FG)+2.0 percent and PPI-FG+2.4 percent for the 
next five years beginning July 1, 2016.\3\ This proposal is based upon 
the Kahn Methodology established in Order No. 561 and applied in 
subsequent five-year review proceedings.\4\ The Commission proposes a 
range because not all pipelines have filed Form No. 6 data for 2014. 
The Commission will select a final index level at the conclusion of 
this proceeding. Commenters are invited to submit comments on, and 
justify alternatives to, the proposed index level. In addition to 
inviting comments, the Commission plans to hold a conference on July 
30, 2015, to discuss the issues raised by this notice. A subsequent 
notice will provide

[[Page 39011]]

additional details regarding the conference.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The five-year review process was established in Order No. 
561. See Revisions to Oil Pipeline Regulations Pursuant to the 
Energy Policy Act, Order No. 561, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 30,985 
(1993), order on reh'g, Order No. 561-A, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 
31,000 (1994), aff'd, Assoc. of Oil Pipelines v. FERC, 83 F.3d 1424 
(D.C. Cir. 1996).
    \2\ The PPI-FG represents the Producer Price Index for Finished 
Goods. The PPI-FG is determined and issued by the Bureau of Labor 
Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor.
    \3\ As provided by 18 CFR 342.3(d)(2) (2014), ``The index will 
be calculated by dividing the PPI-FG for the calendar year 
immediately preceding the index year by the previous calendar year's 
PPI-FG.'' Multiplying the rate ceiling on June 30 of the index year 
by the resulting number gives the rate ceiling for the year 
beginning the next day, July 1.
    \4\ Five-Year Review of Oil Pipeline Index, 133 FERC ] 61,228, 
at PP 5-9, 60-63 (2010), order on reh'g, 135 FERC ] 61,172 (2011). 
See also Five-Year Review of Oil Pipeline Index, 102 FERC ] 61,195 
(2003), aff'd, Flying J Inc., et al., v. FERC, 363 F.3d 495 (D.C. 
Cir. 2004); Five-Year Review of Oil Pipeline Index, 114 FERC ] 
61,293 (2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Background

    2. In Order No. 561, the Commission established an indexing 
methodology that allows oil pipelines to change rates based upon an 
annual index as opposed to making cost-of-service filings.\5\ In Order 
No. 561, the Commission committed to review the index level every five 
years to ensure that the index level chosen by the Commission 
adequately reflects changes to industry costs.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Order No. 561, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 30,985 at 30,947.
    \6\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    3. In Order No. 561 and each successive index review, the 
Commission calculated the index level based upon a methodology 
developed by Dr. Alfred E. Kahn.\7\ The Kahn Methodology measures 
changes in operating costs and capital costs on a per barrel-mile basis 
using FERC Form No. 6 (Form No. 6) data from the prior five-year period 
(for example, between 2009 and 2014 in this proceeding).\8\ The Kahn 
Methodology uses net carrier property per barrel-mile as a proxy for 
capital cost data. The Kahn Methodology assigns a weight to the Form 
No. 6 operating expenses relative to the net carrier property using an 
``operating ratio.'' \9\ The weighted operating expense and the 
weighted net carrier property are then added together to establish the 
cumulative cost change for each pipeline.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The Commission's use of the Kahn Methodology has been 
affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of 
Columbia Circuit. Assoc. of Oil Pipelines v. FERC, 83 F.3d 1424 
(D.C. Cir. 1996) and Flying J Inc., et al., v. FERC, 363 F.3d 495 
(D.C. Cir. 2004).
    \8\ Specifically, this data is drawn from the Form No. 6: 
Carrier Property, page 110; Accrued Depreciation, page 111; 
Operating Revenues and Operating Expenses, page 114; Crude and 
Products Barrel-Miles, page 600. To the extent this information is 
incomplete, alternate data reported in the Form No. 6 has been 
substituted.
    \9\ The ``operating ratio'' = ((Operating Expense at Year 1/
Operating Revenue at Year 1) + (Operating Expense at Year 5/
Operating Revenue at Year 5))/2. If the operating ratio is greater 
than one, then it is assigned the value of 1 in the Kahn Methodology 
calculations.
    \10\ Cumulative Cost Change = (1-operating ratio) * net plant + 
operating ratio * operating expenses.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    4. Once these cumulative cost changes have been calculated for each 
pipeline with sufficient Form No. 6 data, the Kahn Methodology culls a 
data set consisting of pipelines with cumulative per-barrel-mile cost 
changes in the middle 50 percent of all pipelines. This trimming 
removes statistical outliers or spurious data points that could bias 
the sample in either direction. For the middle 50 percent data set, the 
Kahn Methodology considers three different measures of central 
tendency. One measure is the median of each data set. Another measure, 
the weighted mean, calculates an average barrel-mile cost change in 
which each pipeline's cost change is weighted by its barrel-miles. A 
third measure, the un-weighted average, calculates the simple average 
of the percentage cost change per barrel-mile for each pipeline. A 
composite is calculated by taking the simple average of the median, the 
weighted mean, and the un-weighted mean. This composite is compared to 
the value of the PPI-FG index data over the same period. The index 
level is then set at PPI-FG plus (or minus) this differential.

II. Commission Proposal

    5. The Commission proposes to use an index level between PPI-FG+2.0 
percent and PPI-FG+2.4 percent as the index level for the five-year 
period commencing July 1, 2016. This proposal is based upon the Kahn 
Methodology as applied to Form No. 6 data from the 2009 through 2014 
period. The Commission's calculations are included in Attachment A to 
this order.

III. Conference and Comment Procedures

    6. The Commission invites interested persons to submit comments 
regarding this proposal and any alternative methodologies for 
calculating the index level for the five-year period commencing July 1, 
2016.
    7. Initial Comments are due August 24, 2015 and Reply Comments are 
due September 21, 2015. Comments must refer to Docket No. RM15-20-000, 
and must include the name of the commenter, and if applicable, the 
organization represented and their address. On July 30, 2015, the 
Commission plans to hold a conference to discuss the issues raised by 
this notice. A subsequent notice will provide additional details 
regarding the conference.
    8. The Commission encourages comments to be filed electronically 
via the eFiling link on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov. The Commission accepts most standard word processing 
formats. Documents created electronically using word processing 
software should be filed in native applications or print-to-PDF format 
and not in a scanned format. All supporting workpapers must be 
submitted with formulas and in a spreadsheet format acceptable under 
the Commission's eFiling rules. Commenters filing electronically do not 
need to make a paper filing.
    9. Commenters that are not able to file comments electronically 
must send an original of their comments to: Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, Secretary of the Commission, 888 First Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20426.
    10. All comments will be placed in the Commission's public files 
and may be viewed, printed, or downloaded remotely as described in the 
Document Availability section below. Commenters are not required to 
serve copies of their comments on other commenters.

IV. Document Availability

    11. In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the 
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an 
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the 
Internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov) and 
in the Commission's Public Reference Room during normal business hours 
(8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Eastern time) at 888 First Street NE., Room 2A, 
Washington DC 20426.
    12. From the Commission's Home Page on the Internet, this 
information is available in the Commission's document management 
system, eLibrary. The full text of this document is available on 
eLibrary in PDF and Microsoft Word format for viewing, printing, and/or 
downloading. To access this document in eLibrary, type the docket 
number (excluding the last three digits) in the docket number field.
    13. User assistance is available for eLibrary and the Commission's 
Web site during normal business hours. For assistance, please contact 
the Commission's Online Support at 1-866-208-3676 (toll free) or 202-
502-6652 (email at [email protected]) or the Public Reference 
Room at 202-502-8371, TTY 202-502-8659 (email at 
[email protected]).

    By direction of the Commission.

    Dated: June 30, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-16628 Filed 7-7-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P

39010 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 130 / Wednesday, July 8, 2015 / Proposed Rules consequences that could result from any other issues that commenters may • Mail/Hand Delivery: Commenters such disclosures with respect to audit wish to address and the benefits and unable to file comments electronically firms, individual audit partners, audit costs relating to investors, issuers and must mail or hand deliver an original to: committee members, audit committees, other market participants of revising Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, issuers, investors, or others? For disclosure rules pertaining to the audit Office of the Secretary, 888 First Street instance, could potential changes chill committee and the audit committee NE., Washington, DC 20426. or overly formalize audit committee report included in Commission filings. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: communications with auditors? Are Please be as specific as possible in your Monil Patel (Technical Information); there specific liability implications with discussion and analysis of any Office of Energy Market Regulation; respect to additional disclosure made by additional issues. Where possible, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission; the audit committee? If so, please please provide empirical data or 888 First Street NE.; Washington, DC describe. observations to support or illustrate 20426; (202) 502–8296; Andrew 70. Would other categories of your comments. Knudsen (Legal Information); Office of disclosures about the audit committee’s By the Commission. the General Counsel; Federal Energy role relative to the auditor be useful? If Dated: July 1, 2015. Regulatory Commission; 888 First Street so, what other categories? Brent J. Fields, NE.; Washington, DC 20426; (202) 502– 71. How should the Commission 6527. Secretary. address potential changes in the auditor’s report with respect to audit [FR Doc. 2015–16639 Filed 7–7–15; 8:45 am] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: committee oversight of the auditor? BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 1. The Commission annually applies 72. If audit committees are required to an index to existing oil pipeline provide disclosure that relates to transportation rate ceilings to establish information provided by the auditor DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY new rate ceiling levels. The Commission (and it is not currently required to be reexamines this index every five years.1 communicated by the auditor under Federal Energy Regulatory In this notice of inquiry (NOI), the existing PCAOB auditing standards), Commission Commission invites comments on its would changes to PCAOB auditing proposal to use an index level between standards be necessary to ensure that 18 CFR Part 342 the Producer Price Index for Finished additional information beyond existing [Docket No. RM15–20–000] Goods 2 (PPI–FG)+2.0 percent and PPI– required communications is provided to FG+2.4 percent for the next five years the audit committee? Five-Year Review of the Oil Pipeline beginning July 1, 2016.3 This proposal 73. Are there improvements that the Index is based upon the Kahn Methodology Commission should consider to the established in Order No. 561 and AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory applied in subsequent five-year review reporting on the audit committee’s Commission. proceedings.4 The Commission oversight of the accounting and ACTION: Notice of inquiry. proposes a range because not all financial reporting process or internal audits? For instance, should the audit SUMMARY: The Federal Energy pipelines have filed Form No. 6 data for committee disclose how it interacts with Regulatory Commission (Commission) 2014. The Commission will select a the company’s management? invites comments on its proposed five- final index level at the conclusion of 74. Should the Commission consider year review of the index level used to this proceeding. Commenters are invited the potential for changes that would determine annual changes to oil to submit comments on, and justify affect the role and responsibilities of the pipeline rate ceilings. The Commission alternatives to, the proposed index audit committee, such as those related proposes an index level between the level. In addition to inviting comments, to qualifications of members of the audit Producer Price Index for Finished the Commission plans to hold a committee or areas for which audit Goods (PPI–FG)+2.0 percent and PPI– conference on July 30, 2015, to discuss committees should (or should not) be FG+2.4 percent for the five-year period the issues raised by this notice. A responsible? Should the audit commencing July 1, 2016. The subsequent notice will provide committee disclose its role, if any, in Commission invites interested persons risk governance? Should the audit to submit comments regarding this 1 The five-year review process was established in committee report on other areas of Order No. 561. See Revisions to Oil Pipeline proposal and any alternative Regulations Pursuant to the Energy Policy Act, oversight? For example, audit methodologies for calculating the index Order No. 561, FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 30,985 (1993), committees may be charged with level. order on reh’g, Order No. 561–A, FERC Stats. & overseeing treatment of complaints, DATES: Initial Comments are due August Regs. ¶ 31,000 (1994), aff’d, Assoc. of Oil Pipelines cyber risks, information technology v. FERC, 83 F.3d 1424 (D.C. Cir. 1996). 24, 2015, and Reply Comments are due 2 The PPI–FG represents the Producer Price Index risks, or other areas. Would this September 21, 2015. for Finished Goods. The PPI–FG is determined and disclosure distract from the report’s issued by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, focus on oversight of the audit function? Department of Labor. In this regard, we note that identified by docket number by any of 3 As provided by 18 CFR 342.3(d)(2) (2014), ‘‘The commentators have recently indicated the following methods: index will be calculated by dividing the PPI–FG for • Agency Web site: http:// the calendar year immediately preceding the index concern that audit committees are www.ferc.gov. Documents created year by the previous calendar year’s PPI–FG.’’ srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS becoming the catch all of board Multiplying the rate ceiling on June 30 of the index electronically using word processing committees by overseeing anything year by the resulting number gives the rate ceiling software should be filed in native for the year beginning the next day, July 1. related to risk.113 applications or print-to-PDF format and 4 Five-Year Review of Oil Pipeline Index, 133 In addition to the areas for comment not in a scanned format. All supporting FERC ¶ 61,228, at PP 5–9, 60–63 (2010), order on identified above, we are interested in reh’g, 135 FERC ¶ 61,172 (2011). See also Five-Year workpapers must be submitted with Review of Oil Pipeline Index, 102 FERC ¶ 61,195 113 Michael Rapoport & Joann S. Lublin, Meet the formulas and in a spreadsheet format (2003), aff’d, Flying J Inc., et al., v. FERC, 363 F.3d Corporate Board’s ‘‘Kitchen Junk Drawer,’’ Wall St. acceptable under the Commission’s 495 (D.C. Cir. 2004); Five-Year Review of Oil J. (Feb. 3, 2015). eFiling rules. Pipeline Index, 114 FERC ¶ 61,293 (2006). VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:15 Jul 07, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\08JYP1.SGM 08JYP1

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 130 / Wednesday, July 8, 2015 / Proposed Rules 39011 additional details regarding the Methodology considers three different 9. Commenters that are not able to file conference. measures of central tendency. One comments electronically must send an measure is the median of each data set. original of their comments to: Federal I. Background Another measure, the weighted mean, Energy Regulatory Commission, 2. In Order No. 561, the Commission calculates an average barrel-mile cost Secretary of the Commission, 888 First established an indexing methodology change in which each pipeline’s cost Street NE., Washington, DC 20426. that allows oil pipelines to change rates change is weighted by its barrel-miles. 10. All comments will be placed in based upon an annual index as opposed A third measure, the un-weighted the Commission’s public files and may to making cost-of-service filings.5 In average, calculates the simple average of be viewed, printed, or downloaded Order No. 561, the Commission the percentage cost change per barrel- remotely as described in the Document committed to review the index level mile for each pipeline. A composite is Availability section below. Commenters every five years to ensure that the index calculated by taking the simple average are not required to serve copies of their level chosen by the Commission of the median, the weighted mean, and comments on other commenters. adequately reflects changes to industry the un-weighted mean. This composite costs.6 IV. Document Availability is compared to the value of the PPI–FG 3. In Order No. 561 and each index data over the same period. The 11. In addition to publishing the full successive index review, the index level is then set at PPI–FG plus (or text of this document in the Federal Commission calculated the index level minus) this differential. Register, the Commission provides all based upon a methodology developed interested persons an opportunity to by Dr. Alfred E. Kahn.7 The Kahn II. Commission Proposal view and/or print the contents of this Methodology measures changes in 5. The Commission proposes to use an document via the Internet through the operating costs and capital costs on a index level between PPI–FG+2.0 percent Commission’s Home Page (http:// per barrel-mile basis using FERC Form www.ferc.gov) and in the Commission’s and PPI–FG+2.4 percent as the index No. 6 (Form No. 6) data from the prior Public Reference Room during normal level for the five-year period five-year period (for example, between business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. commencing July 1, 2016. This proposal 2009 and 2014 in this proceeding).8 The Eastern time) at 888 First Street NE., is based upon the Kahn Methodology as Kahn Methodology uses net carrier Room 2A, Washington DC 20426. applied to Form No. 6 data from the property per barrel-mile as a proxy for 12. From the Commission’s Home 2009 through 2014 period. The capital cost data. The Kahn Page on the Internet, this information is Commission’s calculations are included Methodology assigns a weight to the available in the Commission’s document in Attachment A to this order. Form No. 6 operating expenses relative management system, eLibrary. The full to the net carrier property using an III. Conference and Comment text of this document is available on ‘‘operating ratio.’’ 9 The weighted Procedures eLibrary in PDF and Microsoft Word operating expense and the weighted net 6. The Commission invites interested format for viewing, printing, and/or carrier property are then added together persons to submit comments regarding downloading. To access this document to establish the cumulative cost change this proposal and any alternative in eLibrary, type the docket number for each pipeline.10 methodologies for calculating the index (excluding the last three digits) in the 4. Once these cumulative cost changes level for the five-year period docket number field. have been calculated for each pipeline commencing July 1, 2016. 13. User assistance is available for with sufficient Form No. 6 data, the 7. Initial Comments are due August eLibrary and the Commission’s Web site Kahn Methodology culls a data set 24, 2015 and Reply Comments are due during normal business hours. For consisting of pipelines with cumulative September 21, 2015. Comments must assistance, please contact the per-barrel-mile cost changes in the refer to Docket No. RM15–20–000, and Commission’s Online Support at 1–866– middle 50 percent of all pipelines. This must include the name of the 208–3676 (toll free) or 202–502–6652 trimming removes statistical outliers or commenter, and if applicable, the (email at FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov) spurious data points that could bias the organization represented and their or the Public Reference Room at 202– sample in either direction. For the address. On July 30, 2015, the 502–8371, TTY 202–502–8659 (email at middle 50 percent data set, the Kahn Commission plans to hold a conference public.referenceroom@ferc.gov). 5 Order No. 561, FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 30,985 at to discuss the issues raised by this By direction of the Commission. 30,947. notice. A subsequent notice will provide Dated: June 30, 2015. 6 Id. additional details regarding the Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., 7 The Commission’s use of the Kahn Methodology conference. Deputy Secretary. has been affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Assoc. 8. The Commission encourages [FR Doc. 2015–16628 Filed 7–7–15; 8:45 am] of Oil Pipelines v. FERC, 83 F.3d 1424 (D.C. Cir. comments to be filed electronically via BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 1996) and Flying J Inc., et al., v. FERC, 363 F.3d the eFiling link on the Commission’s 495 (D.C. Cir. 2004). Web site at http://www.ferc.gov. The 8 Specifically, this data is drawn from the Form No. 6: Carrier Property, page 110; Accrued Commission accepts most standard word processing formats. Documents DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS Depreciation, page 111; Operating Revenues and Operating Expenses, page 114; Crude and Products created electronically using word AFFAIRS Barrel-Miles, page 600. To the extent this processing software should be filed in srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS information is incomplete, alternate data reported 38 CFR Part 4 in the Form No. 6 has been substituted. native applications or print-to-PDF 9 The ‘‘operating ratio’’ = ((Operating Expense at format and not in a scanned format. All RIN 2900–AO44 Year 1/Operating Revenue at Year 1) + (Operating supporting workpapers must be Expense at Year 5/Operating Revenue at Year 5))/ submitted with formulas and in a Schedule for Rating Disabilities—The 2. If the operating ratio is greater than one, then it spreadsheet format acceptable under the Endocrine System is assigned the value of 1 in the Kahn Methodology calculations. Commission’s eFiling rules. AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs. 10 Cumulative Cost Change = (1-operating ratio) * Commenters filing electronically do not ACTION: Proposed rule. net plant + operating ratio * operating expenses. need to make a paper filing. VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:15 Jul 07, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\08JYP1.SGM 08JYP1


Document Created: 2018-02-23 09:12:44
Document Modified: 2018-02-23 09:12:44
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionProposed Rules
ActionNotice of inquiry.
DatesInitial Comments are due August 24, 2015, and Reply Comments are due September 21, 2015.
ContactMonil Patel (Technical Information); Office of Energy Market Regulation; Federal Energy Regulatory Commission; 888 First Street NE.; Washington, DC 20426; (202) 502-8296; Andrew Knudsen (Legal Information); Office of the General Counsel; Federal Energy Regulatory Commission; 888 First Street NE.; Washington, DC 20426; (202) 502-6527.
FR Citation80 FR 39010 
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR