80 FR 39054 - Pressure Sensitive Plastic Tape from Italy: Final Results of Expedited Fourth Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Finding

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 130 (July 8, 2015)

Page Range		39054-39055
FR Document		2015-16745

As a result of this review, the Department of Commerce (the Department) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty finding on pressure sensitive plastic tape (PSP tape) from Italy would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels indicated in the ``Final Results of Sunset Review'' section of this notice.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 130 (Wednesday, July 8, 2015)

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 130 (Wednesday, July 8, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39054-39055]
From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-16745]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-475-059]

Pressure Sensitive Plastic Tape from Italy: Final Results of
Expedited Fourth Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Finding

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of this review, the Department of Commerce (the
Department) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty finding on
pressure sensitive plastic tape (PSP tape) from Italy would be likely
to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels
indicated in the ``Final Results of Sunset Review'' section of this
notice.

DATES: Effective Date: July 8, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terre Keaton Stefanova, AD/CVD
Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1280.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Background

On March 2, 2015, the Department published the notice of initiation
of the fourth sunset review of the antidumping finding on PSP tape from
Italy pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act).\1\ On March 17, 2015, the Department received a notice of
intent to participate in this review from the following domestic
producers of PSP tape: 3M Company, Intertape Polymer Group Inc., and
Shurtape Technologies LLC (collectively, the petitioners), within the
deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). The petitioners claimed
interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as
manufacturers, producers, or wholesalers of a domestic like product in
the United States. On April 1, 2015, we received a complete substantive
response from the petitioners within the 30-day deadline specified in
19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).\2\ We received no substantive responses from
any respondent interested parties. As a result, pursuant to section
751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the
Department conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of the
finding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\1\ See Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review, 80 FR 11164
(March 2, 2015).
\2\ See April 1, 2015, letter from the petitioners regarding
Pressure Sensitive Plastic Tape from Italy: Substantive Response to
Notice of Initiation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Finding

The merchandise subject to the finding is pressure sensitive
plastic tape. The merchandise subject to the finding is classifiable
under subheadings 3919.90.20 and 3919.90.50 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings
are provided for convenience and for customs purposes, our written
description of the scope of this finding is dispositive.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\3\ A full description of the scope of the finding is contained
in the memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Fourth
Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Finding on Pressure
Sensitive Plastic Tape from Italy'' (Issues and Decision
Memorandum), dated concurrently with these results and hereby
adopted by this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

All issues raised in this review are addressed in the accompanying
Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice,
including the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping in
the event of

[[Page 39055]]

revocation and the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail if the
finding were revoked. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service
System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov, and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room
B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the Internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The
signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content.

Final Results of Sunset Review

Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, we
determine that revocation of the antidumping duty finding on PSP tape
from Italy would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of
dumping, and that the magnitude of the margin of dumping likely to
prevail would be 3.70 percent for all producers and exporters \4\ of
subject merchandise.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\4\ Plasturopa-SIPA S.a.S, Autodesivitalia, S.p.A and Boston
S.p.A are excluded from the finding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Interested Parties

This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is
subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in
accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and
19 CFR 351.218.

Dated: June 30, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Finding
IV. History of the Finding
V. Legal Framework
VI. Discussion of the Issues
A. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of Dumping
B. Magnitude of the Margins of Dumping Likely to Prevail
VII. Final Results of Sunset Review
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2015-16745 Filed 7-7-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

39054 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 130 / Wednesday, July 8, 2015 / Notices

Although the HTSUS subheadings are their responsibility concerning the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
provided for convenience and customs return or destruction of proprietary
Background
purposes, our written description of the information disclosed under APO in
scope of this order is dispositive.3 accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. On March 2, 2015, the Department
Timely notification of the return or published the notice of initiation of the
Analysis of Comments Received fourth sunset review of the antidumping
destruction of APO materials or
All issues raised in these reviews, conversion to judicial protective order is finding on PSP tape from Italy pursuant
including the likelihood of continuation hereby requested. Failure to comply to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of
or recurrence of dumping in the event with the regulations and terms of an 1930, as amended (the Act).1 On March
of revocation and the magnitude of the APO is a violation which is subject to 17, 2015, the Department received a
margins likely to prevail if the orders sanction. notice of intent to participate in this
were revoked, are addressed in the We are issuing and publishing these review from the following domestic
accompanying Issues and Decision results and notice in accordance with producers of PSP tape: 3M Company,
Memorandum, which is hereby adopted sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of Intertape Polymer Group Inc., and
by this notice. The Issues and Decision the Act and 19 CFR 351.218. Shurtape Technologies LLC
Memorandum is a public document and Dated: June 30, 2015.
(collectively, the petitioners), within the
is on file electronically via Enforcement deadline specified in 19 CFR
Paul Piquado,
and Compliance’s Antidumping and 351.218(d)(1)(i). The petitioners claimed
Countervailing Duty Centralized Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and interested party status under section
Compliance.
Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 771(9)(C) of the Act, as manufacturers,
ACCESS is available to registered users Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in producers, or wholesalers of a domestic
at http://access.trade.gov, and to all the Issues and Decision Memorandum like product in the United States. On
parties in the Central Records Unit, I. Summary
April 1, 2015, we received a complete
room B8024 of the main Department of II. Background substantive response from the
Commerce building. In addition, a III. Scope of the Orders petitioners within the 30-day deadline
complete version of the Issues and IV. History of the Orders specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).2
Decision Memorandum can be accessed V. Legal Framework We received no substantive responses
directly on the Internet at http:// VI. Discussion of the Issues from any respondent interested parties.
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed A. Likelihood of Continuation or As a result, pursuant to section
Recurrence of Dumping
Issues and Decision Memorandum and 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR
B. Magnitude of the Margins Likely to
the electronic version of the Issues and Prevail 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department
Decision Memorandum are identical in VII. Final Results of Sunset Reviews conducted an expedited (120-day)
content. VIII. Recommendation sunset review of the finding.
[FR Doc. 2015–16747 Filed 7–7–15; 8:45 am]
Final Results of Sunset Reviews Scope of the Finding
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and The merchandise subject to the
752(c)(1),(2) and (3) of the Act, we finding is pressure sensitive plastic
determine that revocation of the DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE tape. The merchandise subject to the
antidumping duty orders on mushrooms finding is classifiable under
from Chile, India, Indonesia and the International Trade Administration subheadings 3919.90.20 and 3919.90.50
PRC would be likely to lead to [A–475–059] of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
continuation or recurrence of dumping the United States (HTSUS). Although
up to the following weighted-average Pressure Sensitive Plastic Tape from the HTSUS subheadings are provided
margin percentages: Italy: Final Results of Expedited Fourth for convenience and for customs
Sunset Review of the Antidumping purposes, our written description of the
Weighted-av- Duty Finding scope of this finding is dispositive.3
Country erage margin
(percent) Enforcement and Compliance,
AGENCY: Analysis of Comments Received
International Trade Administration, All issues raised in this review are
Chile ...................................... 148.51
Department of Commerce. addressed in the accompanying Issues
India ...................................... 243.87
SUMMARY: As a result of this review, the and Decision Memorandum, which is
Indonesia .............................. 16.24
PRC ...................................... 198.63 Department of Commerce (the hereby adopted by this notice, including
Department) finds that revocation of the the likelihood of continuation or
Notification to Interested Parties antidumping duty finding on pressure recurrence of dumping in the event of
sensitive plastic tape (PSP tape) from
This notice serves as the only Italy would be likely to lead to 1 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 80
reminder to parties subject to an continuation or recurrence of dumping FR 11164 (March 2, 2015).
administrative protective order (APO) of at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final 2 See April 1, 2015, letter from the petitioners

Results of Sunset Review’’ section of regarding Pressure Sensitive Plastic Tape from Italy:
3 A full description of the scope of the orders is Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation.
contained in the memorandum to Paul Piquado,
this notice. 3 A full description of the scope of the finding is

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and DATES: Effective Date: July 8, 2015. contained in the memorandum to Paul Piquado,
Compliance, from Christian Marsh, Deputy FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Compliance, from Christian Marsh, Deputy
Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Issues and
Terre Keaton Stefanova, AD/CVD Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Issues and
Expedited Third Sunset Reviews of the Compliance, International Trade Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the
Antidumping Duty Orders on Certain Preserved Administration, U.S. Department of Fourth Expedited Sunset Review of the
Mushrooms from Chile, India, Indonesia and the Antidumping Duty Finding on Pressure Sensitive
People’s Republic of China’’ (Issues and Decision
Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution Plastic Tape from Italy’’ (Issues and Decision
Memorandum), dated concurrently with these Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; Memorandum), dated concurrently with these
results and hereby adopted by this notice. telephone: (202) 482–1280. results and hereby adopted by this notice.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:49 Jul 07, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08JYN1.SGM 08JYN1

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 130 / Wednesday, July 8, 2015 / Notices 39055

revocation and the magnitude of the A. Likelihood of Continuation or contained in the memorandum from
margins likely to prevail if the finding Recurrence of Dumping Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
were revoked. The Issues and Decision B. Magnitude of the Margins of Dumping Secretary for Antidumping and
Likely to Prevail Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul
Memorandum is a public document and
VII. Final Results of Sunset Review
is on file electronically via Enforcement VIII. Recommendation
Piquado, Assistant Secretary for
and Compliance’s Antidumping and [FR Doc. 2015–16745 Filed 7–7–15; 8:45 am] Enforcement and Compliance, titled
Countervailing Duty Centralized BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
‘‘Decision Memorandum for Preliminary
Electronic Service System (ACCESS). Results of Antidumping Duty
ACCESS is available to registered users Administrative Review: Light Walled
at http://access.trade.gov, and to all DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Rectangular Pipe and Tube from
parties in the Central Records Unit, Mexico’’ (Preliminary Decision
room B8024 of the main Department of International Trade Administration Memorandum), which is issued
Commerce building. In addition, a concurrent with and hereby adopted by
[A–201–836]
complete version of the Issues and this notice.
Decision Memorandum can be accessed Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and The Preliminary Decision
directly on the Internet at http:// Tube from Mexico: Preliminary Results Memorandum is a public document and
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed of Antidumping Duty Administrative is on file electronically via Enforcement
Issues and Decision Memorandum and Review; 2013–2014 and Compliance’s Antidumping and
the electronic version of the Issues and Countervailing Duty Centralized
Decision Memorandum are identical in AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
content. International Trade Administration, Access to ACCESS is available to
Department of Commerce. registered users at http://
Final Results of Sunset Review SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce access.trade.gov and is available to all
Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and (the Department) is conducting an parties in the Central Records Unit,
752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, we administrative review of the Room 7046 of the main Department of
determine that revocation of the antidumping duty order on light-walled Commerce building. In addition, a
antidumping duty finding on PSP tape rectangular pipe and tube (LWR pipe complete version of the Preliminary
from Italy would be likely to lead to and tube) from Mexico. The period of Decision Memorandum can be accessed
continuation or recurrence of dumping, review (POR) is August 1, 2013, through directly on the Internet at http://
and that the magnitude of the margin of July 31, 2014. The review covers one enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.
dumping likely to prevail would be 3.70 producer/exporter of the subject A list of topics discussed in the
percent for all producers and exporters 4 merchandise, Perfiles y Herrajes LM, Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
of subject merchandise. S.A. de C.V. (Perfiles). attached as an Appendix to this notice.
We preliminarily determine that sales The signed Preliminary Decision
Notification to Interested Parties of subject merchandise by Perfiles were Memorandum and the electronic
This notice serves as the only made at less than normal value during versions of the Preliminary Decision
reminder to parties subject to an the POR. Interested parties are invited to Memorandum are identical in content.
administrative protective order (APO) of comment on these preliminary results.
their responsibility concerning the DATES: Effective Date: July 8, 2015.
Methodology
return or destruction of proprietary FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Department is conducting this
information disclosed under APO in Ilissa Kabak Shefferman or Brian C. review in accordance with section
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Davis, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
Timely written notification of the return Enforcement and Compliance, amended (the Act). For a full
or destruction of APO materials or International Trade Administration, description of the methodology
conversion to judicial protective order is U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th underlying our conclusions, see the
hereby requested. Failure to comply Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
with the regulations and terms of an Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
APO is a violation which is subject to Preliminary Results of Review
482–4684 or (202) 482–7924,
sanction. respectively. We preliminarily determine that, for
We are issuing and publishing these the period August 1, 2013, through July
results and notice in accordance with SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 30, 2014, the following weighted-
sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of Scope of the Order average dumping margin exists:
the Act and 19 CFR 351.218.
The merchandise that is the subject of Weighted-av-
Dated: June 30, 2015. the order is certain welded carbon- Manufacturer/Exporter erage margin
Paul Piquado, quality light-walled steel pipe and tube, (percent)
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and of rectangular (including square) cross
Compliance. section, having a wall thickness of less Perfiles y Herrajes, L.M. SA
de CV ................................ 4.15
Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in than 4 mm. The welded carbon-quality
the Issues and Decision Memorandum rectangular pipe and tube subject to the
order is currently classified under the Disclosure and Public Comment
I. Summary Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the The Department intends to disclose to
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

II. Background United States (HTSUS) subheadings interested parties to the proceeding any
III. Scope of the Finding
7306.61.50.00 and 7306.61.70.60. This calculations performed in connection
IV. History of the Finding
V. Legal Framework tariff classification is provided for with these preliminary results of review
VI. Discussion of the Issues convenience and Customs purposes; within five days after the date of
however, the written description of the publication of this notice.1 Interested
4 Plasturopa-SIPA S.a.S, Autodesivitalia, S.p.A scope of the order is dispositive. A full
and Boston S.p.A are excluded from the finding. description of the scope of the order is 1 See 19 CFR 351.224(b)

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:49 Jul 07, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08JYN1.SGM 08JYN1

Document Created: 2018-02-23 09:12:15
Document Modified: 2018-02-23 09:12:15

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
Dates		Effective Date: July 8, 2015.
Contact		Terre Keaton Stefanova, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1280.
FR Citation		80 FR 39054

80 FR 39054 - Pressure Sensitive Plastic Tape from Italy: Final Results of Expedited Fourth Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Finding

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCEInternational Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 130 (July 8, 2015)

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration