80 FR 39400 - Safety Zone; Incredoubleman Triathlon, Henderson Bay, Lake Ontario, Sackets Harbor, NY

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 131 (July 9, 2015)

Page Range		39400-39402
FR Document		2015-16806
The Coast Guard proposes to establish a safety zone on Henderson Bay, Lake Ontario, Sackets Harbor, NY for a triathlon event. This safety zone is necessary to protect swimmers from vessels operating in the area. This safety zone would restrict vessels from a portion of Lake Ontario during the swimming portion of the Incredoubleman Triathlon event.
Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 131 (Thursday, July 9, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 131 (Thursday, July 9, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 39400-39402]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-16806]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2015-0509]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Incredoubleman Triathlon, Henderson Bay, Lake 
Ontario, Sackets Harbor, NY

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a safety zone on 
Henderson Bay, Lake Ontario, Sackets Harbor, NY for a triathlon event. 
This safety zone is necessary to protect swimmers from vessels 
operating in the area. This safety zone would restrict vessels from a 
portion of Lake Ontario during the swimming portion of the 
Incredoubleman Triathlon event.

DATES: Comments and related materials must be received by the Coast 
Guard on or before August 10, 2015. Requests for public meetings must 
be received July 29, 2015.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2015-0509 using any one of the following methods:
    (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
    (3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of 
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    (4) Delivery: At the same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal holidays. The telephone 
number is 202-366-9329.
    To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods. 
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of 
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on 
submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email LTJG Amanda Garcia, Chief of Waterways Management, U.S. 
Coast Guard Sector Buffalo; telephone 716-843-9573, email 
SectorBuffaloMarineSafety@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or 
submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program 
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826 or 1-800-647-5527.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Acronyms

DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register

A. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting 
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted 
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any 
personal information you have provided.

1. Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this 
rulemaking (USCG-2015-0509), indicate the specific section of this 
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each 
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material 
online at http://www.regulations.gov or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, 
but please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online, 
it will be considered received by the Coast Guard when the comment is 
successfully transmitted. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your 
comment, it will be considered received by the Coast Guard when the 
comment is received at the Docket Management Facility. We recommend 
that you include your name and a mailing address, an email address, or 
a telephone number in the body of your document so that we can contact 
you if we have questions regarding your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov, 
type the docket number [USCG-2015-0509] in the ``SEARCH'' box and click 
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with 
this notice of proposed rulemaking.
    If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them 
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for 
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would 
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped, 
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and 
material received during the comment period and may change the rule 
based on your comments.

2. Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble 
as being available in the docket, go to

[[Page 39401]]

http://www.regulations.gov, type the docket number (USCG-2015-0509) in 
the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on 
the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket 
Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the 
Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
except Federal holidays.

3. Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any 
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or 
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, 
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice 
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the 
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

4. Public Meeting

    We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. If you want us to hold 
a public meeting, submit your request by July 29, 2015, using one of 
the methods specified under ADDRESSES. Any subsequent meetings held 
where public comment is sought to aid this rulemaking would be held at 
a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.

B. Basis and Purpose

    The legal basis and authorities for this rulemaking are found in 33 
U.S.C. 1231, 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 
CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Public Law 107-295, 116 Stat. 
2064; and Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1, which 
collectively authorize the Coast Guard to establish and define 
regulatory safety zones.
    Between 7:45 a.m. until 9:30 a.m. on September 12 and 13, 2015, a 
triathlon/swimming race will be held offshore of Henderson Bay, Lake 
Ontario, Sackets Harbor, NY. The Captain of the Port Buffalo has 
determined that a large scale swimming event on a navigable waterway 
will pose a significant risk to participants and the boating public.

D. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    With the aforementioned hazards in mind, the Captain of the Port 
Buffalo proposes to establish a safety zone that will ensure the safety 
of participants, spectators, and vessels during the IncreDoubleman 
Triathlon event. The proposed safety zone would be effective and 
enforced from 7 a.m. until 10 a.m. on September 12 and 13, 2015. The 
proposed zone would encompass all areas on the waters of Henderson Bay, 
Lake Ontario, Sackets Harbor, NY within the following positions: 
43[deg]53'52.58'' N. and 076[deg]7'40.19'' W., then Northwest to 
43[deg]54'4.44'' N. and 076[deg]7'43.89'' W., then Southwest to 
43[deg]53'57.19'' N. and 076[deg]8'19.19'' W., then Southeast to 
43[deg]53'52.58'' N. and 076[deg]7'40.19'' W. (NAD 83).
    Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the proposed safety 
zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Buffalo 
or his on-scene representative. The Captain of the Port or his on-scene 
representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.

E. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes 
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our 
analyses based on these statutes or executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under 
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, 
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and 
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential 
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or 
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and 
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. It is not 
``significant'' under the regulatory policies and procedures of the 
Department of Homeland Security (DHS). We conclude that this proposed 
rule is not a significant regulatory action because we anticipate that 
it will have minimal impact on the economy, will not interfere with 
other agencies, will not adversely alter the budget of any grant or 
loan recipients, and will not raise any novel legal or policy issues. 
The safety zone created by this proposed rule will be relatively small 
and enforced for relatively short time. Also, the proposed safety zone 
is designed to minimize its impact on navigable waters.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this 
proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities. This proposed rule may affect the 
following entities, some of which might be small entities: The owners 
or operators of vessels intending to transit or anchor in a portion of 
Lake Ontario near Sackets Harbor, NY between 7 a.m. to 1 a.m. on 
September 12 and 13, 2015.
    This proposed safety zone will not have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities for the following 
reasons: The safety zone will be enforced for only 3 hours early in the 
day for two days. Traffic may be allowed to pass through the zone with 
the permission of the Captain of the Port. The Captain of the Port can 
be reached via VHF channel 16. Before the enforcement of the zone, we 
would issue local Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule 
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment 
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to 
what degree this proposed rule would economically affect it.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect 
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you 
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that comment on this proposed rule or any policy or action of 
the Coast Guard.

4. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule will not call for a new collection of 
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520.).

5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and 
determined that this

[[Page 39402]]

rulemaking does not have implications for federalism.

6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not 
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this 
proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

    This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or 
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, 
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected 
Property Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize 
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045, 
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety 
Risks. This proposed rule is not an economically significant rule and 
would not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that 
might disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under 
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

    This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under 
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

13. Technical Standards

    This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we 
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland 
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction 
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and 
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a 
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a 
significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule is 
categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the 
Commandant Instruction because it involves the establishment of a 
safety zone.
    A preliminary environmental analysis checklist and a preliminary 
categorical exclusion determination are available in the docket where 
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may 
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this 
proposed rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes 
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T09-0509 to subpart F under the undesignated center 
heading Ninth Coast Guard District to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T09-0509  Safety Zone; Incredoubleman Triathlon, Henderson 
Bay, Lake Ontario, Sackets Harbor, NY.

    (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All areas on the 
waters of Henderson Bay, Lake Ontario, Sackets Harbor, NY within the 
following positions: 43[deg]53'52.58'' N. and 076[deg]7'40.19'' W., 
then Northwest to 43[deg]54'4.44'' N. and 076[deg]7'43.89'' W., then 
Southwest to 43[deg]53'57.19'' N. and 076[deg]8'19.19'' W., then 
Southeast to 43[deg]53'52.58'' N and 076[deg]7'40.19'' W. (NAD 83).
    (b) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 7 a.m. 
until 10 a.m. on September 12 and 13, 2015.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in 
Sec.  165.23, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within this safety 
zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Buffalo 
or his designated on-scene representative.
    (2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may 
be permitted by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his designated on-
scene representative.
    (3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port 
Buffalo is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who 
has been designated by the Captain of the Port Buffalo to act on his 
behalf.
    (4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety 
zone shall contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his on-scene 
representative to obtain permission to do so. The Captain of the Port 
Buffalo or his on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 
16. Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in the safety 
zone must comply with all directions given to them by the Captain of 
the Port Buffalo, or his on-scene representative.

    Dated: June 15, 2015.
B.W. Roche,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. 2015-16806 Filed 7-8-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
39402 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 131 / Thursday, July 9, 2015 / Proposed Rules

rulemaking does not have implications more Indian tribes, on the relationship Department of Homeland Security Delegation
for federalism. between the Federal Government and No. 0170.1.
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
6. Protest Activities ■ 2. Add § 165.T09–0509 to subpart F
power and responsibilities between the
The Coast Guard respects the First Federal Government and Indian tribes. under the undesignated center heading
Amendment rights of protesters. Ninth Coast Guard District to read as
Protesters are asked to contact the 12. Energy Effects follows:
person listed in the FOR FURTHER This proposed rule is not a § 165.T09–0509 Safety Zone;
INFORMATION CONTACT section to ‘‘significant energy action’’ under Incredoubleman Triathlon, Henderson Bay,
coordinate protest activities so that your Executive Order 13211, Actions Lake Ontario, Sackets Harbor, NY.
message can be received without Concerning Regulations That
jeopardizing the safety or security of Significantly Affect Energy Supply, (a) Location. The following area is a
people, places or vessels. Distribution, or Use. safety zone: All areas on the waters of
Henderson Bay, Lake Ontario, Sackets
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 13. Technical Standards Harbor, NY within the following
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act This proposed rule does not use positions: 43°53′52.58″ N. and
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires technical standards. Therefore, we did 076°7′40.19″ W., then Northwest to
Federal agencies to assess the effects of not consider the use of voluntary 43°54′4.44″ N. and 076°7′43.89″ W.,
their discretionary regulatory actions. In consensus standards. then Southwest to 43°53′57.19″ N. and
particular, the Act addresses actions 076°8′19.19″ W., then Southeast to
that may result in the expenditure by a 14. Environment 43°53′52.58″ N and 076°7′40.19″ W.
State, local, or tribal government, in the We have analyzed this proposed rule (NAD 83).
aggregate, or by the private sector of under Department of Homeland (b) Enforcement period. This section
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or Security Management Directive 023–01 will be enforced from 7 a.m. until 10
more in any one year. Though this and Commandant Instruction a.m. on September 12 and 13, 2015.
proposed rule would not result in such M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
an expenditure, we do discuss the (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
Guard in complying with the National the general regulations in § 165.23, entry
effects of this proposed rule elsewhere Environmental Policy Act of 1969
in this preamble. into, transiting, or anchoring within this
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and safety zone is prohibited unless
8. Taking of Private Property have made a preliminary determination authorized by the Captain of the Port
that this action is one of a category of Buffalo or his designated on-scene
This proposed rule would not cause a actions that do not individually or
taking of private property or otherwise representative.
cumulatively have a significant effect on
have taking implications under the human environment. This proposed (2) This safety zone is closed to all
Executive Order 12630, Governmental rule is categorically excluded, under vessel traffic, except as may be
Actions and Interference with figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(g), of the permitted by the Captain of the Port
Constitutionally Protected Property Commandant Instruction because it Buffalo or his designated on-scene
Rights. representative.
involves the establishment of a safety
9. Civil Justice Reform zone. (3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
This proposed rule meets applicable A preliminary environmental analysis the Captain of the Port Buffalo is any
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of checklist and a preliminary categorical Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice exclusion determination are available in petty officer who has been designated
Reform, to minimize litigation, the docket where indicated under by the Captain of the Port Buffalo to act
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or on his behalf.
burden. information that may lead to the (4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
discovery of a significant environmental or operate within the safety zone shall
10. Protection of Children impact from this proposed rule. contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo
We have analyzed this proposed rule List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 or his on-scene representative to obtain
under Executive Order 13045, permission to do so. The Captain of the
Protection of Children from Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation Port Buffalo or his on-scene
Environmental Health Risks and Safety (water), Reporting and recordkeeping representative may be contacted via
Risks. This proposed rule is not an requirements, Security measures, VHF Channel 16. Vessel operators given
economically significant rule and would Waterways. permission to enter or operate in the
not create an environmental risk to For the reasons discussed in the safety zone must comply with all
health or risk to safety that might preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to directions given to them by the Captain
disproportionately affect children. amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows: of the Port Buffalo, or his on-scene
11. Indian Tribal Governments representative.
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
This proposed rule does not have AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS Dated: June 15, 2015.
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

tribal implications under Executive B.W. Roche,
Order 13175, Consultation and ■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Coordination with Indian Tribal continues to read as follows: Port Buffalo.
Governments, because it would not have Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; [FR Doc. 2015–16806 Filed 7–8–15; 8:45 am]
a substantial direct effect on one or 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; BILLING CODE 9110–04–P

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:17 Jul 08, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\09JYP1.SGM 09JYP1
Document Created: 2018-02-23 09:13:54
Document Modified: 2018-02-23 09:13:54
Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Dates		Comments and related materials must be received by the Coast Guard on or before August 10, 2015. Requests for public meetings must be received July 29, 2015.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, call or email LTJG Amanda Garcia, Chief of Waterways Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Buffalo; telephone 716-843-9573, email [email protected] If you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826 or 1-800-647-5527.
FR Citation		80 FR 39400
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways
80 FR 39400 - Safety Zone; Incredoubleman Triathlon, Henderson Bay, Lake Ontario, Sackets Harbor, NY

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 131 (July 9, 2015)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
