80 FR 39454 - Vogtle Electric Generating Station, Units 3 and 4

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 131 (July 9, 2015)

Page Range		39454-39458
FR Document		2015-16796
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering issuance of an amendment to Combined Licenses (NPF-91 and NPF-92), issued to Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. (SNC), Georgia Power Company, Oglethorpe Power Corporation, MEAG Power SPVM, LLC., MEAG Power SPVJ, LLC., MEAG POWER SPVP, LLC., and the City of Dalton, Georgia (together ``the licensees''), for construction and operation of the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant (VEGP), Units 3 and 4, located in Burke County, Georgia. The proposed amendment departs from Tier 2* and associated Tier 2 information in the VEGP Units 3 and 4 Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) (which includes the plant specific Design Control Document Tier 2 information) to revise the application of welding codes. An initial Federal Register notice was published on June 9, 2015, providing an opportunity to comment, request a hearing, and petition for leave to intervene for a License Amendment Request (LAR) for the VEGP combined licenses. The licensee has submitted a revision to the original LAR, dated May 26, 2015. This new revision increases the scope of the original LAR.
Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 131 (Thursday, July 9, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 131 (Thursday, July 9, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39454-39458]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-16796]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 052-00025 and 052-00026; NRC-2008-0252]


Vogtle Electric Generating Station, Units 3 and 4

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: License amendment application; opportunity to comment, request 
a hearing, and petition for leave to intervene.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering 
issuance of an amendment to Combined Licenses (NPF-91 and NPF-92), 
issued to Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. (SNC), Georgia Power 
Company, Oglethorpe Power Corporation, MEAG Power SPVM, LLC., MEAG 
Power SPVJ, LLC., MEAG POWER SPVP, LLC., and the City of Dalton, 
Georgia (together ``the licensees''), for construction and operation of 
the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant (VEGP), Units 3 and 4, located in 
Burke County, Georgia.
    The proposed amendment departs from Tier 2* and associated Tier 2 
information in the VEGP Units 3 and 4 Updated Final Safety Analysis 
Report (UFSAR) (which includes the plant specific Design Control 
Document Tier 2 information) to revise the application of welding 
codes. An initial Federal Register notice was published on June 9, 
2015, providing an opportunity to comment, request a hearing, and 
petition for leave to intervene for a License Amendment Request (LAR) 
for the VEGP combined licenses. The licensee has submitted a revision 
to the original LAR, dated May 26, 2015. This new revision increases 
the scope of the original LAR.

DATES: Submit comments by August 10, 2015. Requests for a hearing or 
petition for leave to intervene must be filed by September 8, 2015.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2008-0252. Address 
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415-
3463; email: [email protected]. For technical questions, contact 
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of 
this document.
     Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey, Office of Administration, 
Mail Stop: OWFN-12-H08, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, 
DC 20555-0001.

[[Page 39455]]

    For additional direction on obtaining information and submitting 
comments, see ``Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments'' in the 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chandu Patel, Office of New Reactors, 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; 
telephone: 301-415-3025; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments

A. Obtaining Information

    Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2008-0252 when contacting the NRC 
about the availability of information for this action. You may obtain 
publicly-available information related to this action by any of the 
following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2008-0252.
     NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System 
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the 
ADAMS Public Documents collection at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and 
then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, 
please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 
1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to [email protected]. The 
application for amendment, dated June 29, 2015, is available in ADAMS 
under Accession No. ML15181A078.
     NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public 
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.

B. Submitting Comments

    Please include Docket ID NRC-2008-0252 in your comment submission.
    The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact 
information that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in your 
comment submission. The NRC posts all comment submissions at http://www.regulations.gov as well as entering the comment submissions into 
ADAMS. The NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove 
identifying or contact information.
    If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons 
for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to 
include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be 
publicly disclosed in their comment submission. Your request should 
state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to 
remove such information before making the comment submissions available 
to the public or entering the comment submissions into ADAMS.
Introduction
    The NRC is considering issuance of an amendment to Facility 
Operating License Nos. NPF-91 and NPF-92, issued to Southern Nuclear 
Operating Company, Inc. (SNC), Georgia Power Company, Oglethorpe Power 
Corporation, MEAG Power SPVM, LLC, MEAG Power SPVJ, LLC., MEAG POWER 
SPVP, LLC., and the City of Dalton, Georgia for operation of the Vogtle 
Electric Generating Plant Units 3 and 4, located in Burke County, 
Georgia.
    The proposed amendment departs from Tier 2* and associated Tier 2 
information in the VEGP Units 3 and 4 UFSAR (which includes the plant 
specific Design Control Document Tier 2 information) to revise the 
application of American Institute for Steel Construction (AISC) N690-
1994, Specification for the Design, Fabrication and Erection of Steel 
Safety Related Structures for Nuclear Facilities, to allow use of 
American Welding Society (AWS) D1.1-2000, Structural Welding Code--
Steel, in lieu of the AWS D1.1-1992 edition identified in AISC N690-
1994.
    Before any issuance of the proposed license amendment, the NRC will 
need to make the findings required by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 
amended (the Act), and NRC's regulations.
    The NRC has made a proposed determination that the license 
amendment request involves no significant hazards consideration. Under 
the NRC's regulations in Sec.  50.92 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (10 CFR), this means that operation of the facility in 
accordance with the proposed amendment would not (1) involve a 
significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident 
previously evaluated; or (2) create the possibility of a new or 
different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated; or 
(3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. As required 
by 10 CFR 50.91(a), the licensee has provided its analysis of the issue 
of no significant hazards consideration, which is presented below:

    1. Does the proposed change involve a significant increase in 
the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated?
    Response: No.
    The design functions of the nuclear island structures are to 
provide support, protection, and separation for the seismic Category 
I mechanical and electrical equipment located in the nuclear island. 
The nuclear island structures are structurally designed to meet 
seismic Category I requirements as defined in Regulatory Guide 1.29. 
The design functions of the seismic Category II portions of the 
annex building and turbine building are to provide integrity for 
non-seismic items located in the proximity of safety-related items, 
the failure of which during a safe shutdown earthquake could result 
in loss of function of safety-related items.
    The use of AWS D1.1-2000 and the supplemental provisions provide 
criteria for the design, qualification, fabrication, and inspection 
of welds for nuclear island structures and seismic Category II 
portions of the annex building and turbine building. These 
structures continue to meet the applicable portions of ACI 349, the 
remaining applicable portions of AISC N690 not related to 
requirements for welding, including the supplemental requirements 
described in UFSAR Subsections 3.8.4.4.1 and 3.8.4.5, and the 
supplemental requirements identified in the UFSAR Subsection 3.8.3 
for structural modules. The use of AWS D1.1-2000 does not have an 
adverse impact on the response of the nuclear island structures, or 
seismic Category II portions of the annex building and turbine 
building to safe shutdown earthquake ground motions or loads due to 
anticipated transients or postulated accident conditions. The change 
does not impact the support, design, or operation of mechanical and 
fluid systems. There is no change to plant systems or the response 
of systems to postulated accident conditions. There is no change to 
the predicted radioactive releases due to normal operation or 
postulated accident conditions. The plant response to previously 
evaluated accidents or external events is not adversely affected, 
nor does the change described create any new accident precursors.
    Therefore, the proposed amendment does not involve a significant 
increase in the probability or consequences of an accident 
previously evaluated.
    2. Does the proposed change create the possibility of a new or 
different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated?
    Response: No.
    The proposed change includes the use of AWS D1.1-2000 and 
supplemental provisions to provide criteria for the design, 
qualification, fabrication, and inspection of welds for nuclear 
island structures and the seismic Category II portions of the annex 
building and turbine building. The proposed change provides a 
consistent set of requirements for welding of structures required to 
be designed to the requirements of ACI 349 and AISC N690. The change 
to the details does not change the design function, support, design, 
or operation of mechanical and fluid systems. The change to the 
welding criteria does not result in a new failure mechanism for the 
pertinent structures or new accident precursors. As a result, the 
design function of the structures

[[Page 39456]]

is not adversely affected by the proposed change.
    Therefore, the proposed amendment does not create the 
possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident 
previously evaluated.
    3. Does the proposed change involve a significant reduction in a 
margin of safety?
    Response: No.
    The AWS codes are consensus standards written, revised, and 
approved by industry experts experienced in welding and weld design. 
The proposed change adds AWS D1.1-2000 to the list of applicable 
codes and standards in the UFSAR and adds supplemental provisions 
consistent with AWS D1.1-2010. The 2000 edition includes criteria 
that consider directionality in the weld, which allows for an 
increase factor on structural fillet weld strength relative to the 
angle of load direction. Supplemental provisions are added to the 
provisions in AWS D1.1-2000 for the application of directionality 
for linear fillet weld groups concentrically loaded in-plane to the 
axis of the weld that include elements oriented both longitudinally 
and transversely to the direction of applied load to address 
deformation of the welds. The change also specifies extension of the 
application of directionality provisions to linear and 
concentrically loaded rectangular and circular fillet weld groups 
loaded out-of-plane to the axis of the weld to supplement the 
conditions specified in AWS D1.1. These changes are supported by 
tests that provide the justification for criteria that consider the 
directionality. These changes can be similarly applied to welds in 
the AP1000 to continue to provide the necessary safety margin.
    Therefore, the proposed amendment does not involve a significant 
reduction in a margin of safety.

    The NRC staff has reviewed the licensee's analysis and, based on 
this review, it appears that the three standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are 
satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff proposes to determine that the 
license amendment request involves a No Significant Hazards 
Consideration.
    The NRC is seeking public comments on this proposed determination 
that the license amendment request involves no significant hazards 
consideration. Any comments received within 30 days after the date of 
publication of this notice will be considered in making any final 
determination.
    Normally, the Commission will not issue the amendment until the 
expiration of 60 days after the date of publication of this notice. The 
Commission may issue the license amendment before expiration of the 60-
day notice period if the Commission concludes the amendment involves no 
significant hazards consideration. In addition, the Commission may 
issue the amendment prior to the expiration of the 30-day comment 
period should circumstances change during the 30-day comment period 
such that failure to act in a timely way would result, for example, in 
derating or shutdown of the facility. Should the Commission take action 
prior to the expiration of either the comment period or the notice 
period, it will publish in the Federal Register a notice of issuance. 
Should the Commission make a final No Significant Hazards Consideration 
Determination, any hearing will take place after issuance. The 
Commission expects that the need to take this action will occur very 
infrequently.

II. Opportunity To Request a Hearing and Petition for Leave To 
Intervene

    Within 60 days after the date of publication of this Federal 
Register notice, any person whose interest may be affected by this 
proceeding and who desires to participate as a party in the proceeding 
must file a written request for hearing or a petition for leave to 
intervene specifying the contentions which the person seeks to have 
litigated in the hearing with respect to the license amendment request. 
Requests for hearing and petitions for leave to intervene shall be 
filed in accordance with the NRC's ``Agency Rules of Practice and 
Procedure'' in 10 CFR part 2. Interested person(s) should consult a 
current copy of 10 CFR 2.309, which is available at the NRC's PDR. The 
NRC's regulations are accessible electronically from the NRC Library on 
the NRC's Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/.
    As required by 10 CFR 2.309, a request for hearing or petition for 
leave to intervene must set forth with particularity the interest of 
the petitioner in the proceeding and how that interest may be affected 
by the results of the proceeding. The hearing request or petition must 
specifically explain the reasons why intervention should be permitted, 
with particular reference to the following general requirements: (1) 
The name, address, and telephone number of the requestor or petitioner; 
(2) the nature of the requestor's/petitioner's right under the Act to 
be made a party to the proceeding; (3) the nature and extent of the 
requestor's/petitioner's property, financial, or other interest in the 
proceeding; and (4) the possible effect of any decision or order which 
may be entered in the proceeding on the requestor's/petitioner's 
interest. The hearing request or petition must also include the 
specific contentions that the requestor/petitioner seeks to have 
litigated at the proceeding.
    For each contention, the requestor/petitioner must provide a 
specific statement of the issue of law or fact to be raised or 
controverted, as well as a brief explanation of the basis for the 
contention. Additionally, the requestor/petitioner must demonstrate 
that the issue raised by each contention is within the scope of the 
proceeding and is material to the findings that the NRC must make to 
support the granting of a license amendment in response to the 
application. The hearing request or petition must also include a 
concise statement of the alleged facts or expert opinion that support 
the contention and on which the requestor/petitioner intends to rely at 
the hearing, together with references to those specific sources and 
documents. The hearing request or petition must provide sufficient 
information to show that a genuine dispute exists with the applicant on 
a material issue of law or fact, including references to specific 
portions of the application for amendment that the petitioner disputes 
and the supporting reasons for each dispute. If the requestor/
petitioner believes that the application for amendment fails to contain 
information on a relevant matter as required by law, the requestor/
petitioner must identify each failure and the supporting reasons for 
the requestor's/petitioner's belief. Each contention must be one which, 
if proven, would entitle the requestor/petitioner to relief. A 
requestor/petitioner who does not satisfy these requirements for at 
least one contention will not be permitted to participate as a party.
    Those permitted to intervene become parties to the proceeding, 
subject to any limitations in the order granting leave to intervene, 
and have the opportunity to participate fully in the conduct of the 
hearing with respect to resolution of that person's admitted 
contentions, including the opportunity to present evidence and to 
submit a cross-examination plan for cross-examination of witnesses, 
consistent with NRC's regulations, policies, and procedures. The Atomic 
Safety and Licensing Board will set the time and place for any 
prehearing conferences and evidentiary hearings, and the appropriate 
notices will be provided.
    Hearing requests or petitions for leave to intervene must be filed 
no later than 60 days from the date of publication of this notice. 
Requests for hearing, petitions for leave to intervene, and motions for 
leave to file new or amended contentions that are filed after the 60-
day deadline will not be entertained absent a determination by the 
presiding officer that the filing demonstrates good cause by satisfying 
the three factors in 10 CFR 2.309(c)(1)(i)-(iii).

[[Page 39457]]

    If a hearing is requested, the Commission will make a final 
determination on the issue of no significant hazards consideration. The 
final determination will serve to decide when the hearing is held. If 
the final determination is that the amendment request involves no 
significant hazards consideration, the Commission may issue the 
amendment and make it immediately effective, notwithstanding the 
request for a hearing. Any hearing held would take place after issuance 
of the amendment. If the final determination is that the amendment 
request involves a significant hazards consideration, then any hearing 
held would take place before the issuance of any amendment unless the 
Commission finds an imminent danger to the health or safety of the 
public, in which case it will issue an appropriate order or rule under 
10 CFR part 2.

III. Electronic Submissions (E-Filing)

    All documents filed in NRC adjudicatory proceedings, including a 
request for hearing, a petition for leave to intervene, any motion or 
other document filed in the proceeding prior to the submission of a 
request for hearing or petition to intervene, and documents filed by 
interested governmental entities participating under 10 CFR 2.315(c), 
must be filed in accordance with the NRC's E-Filing rule (72 FR 49139; 
August 28, 2007). The E-Filing process requires participants to submit 
and serve all adjudicatory documents over the internet, or in some 
cases to mail copies on electronic storage media. Participants may not 
submit paper copies of their filings unless they seek an exemption in 
accordance with the procedures described below.
    To comply with the procedural requirements of E-Filing, at least 
ten 10 days prior to the filing deadline, the participant should 
contact the Office of the Secretary by email at [email protected], 
or by telephone at 301-415-1677, to request (1) a digital 
identification (ID) certificate, which allows the participant (or its 
counsel or representative) to digitally sign documents and access the 
E-Submittal server for any proceeding in which it is participating; and 
(2) advise the Secretary that the participant will be submitting a 
request or petition for hearing (even in instances in which the 
participant, or its counsel or representative, already holds an NRC-
issued digital ID certificate). Based upon this information, the 
Secretary will establish an electronic docket for the hearing in this 
proceeding if the Secretary has not already established an electronic 
docket.
    Information about applying for a digital ID certificate is 
available on the NRC's public Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/getting-started.html. System requirements for accessing 
the E-Submittal server are detailed in the NRC's ``Guidance for 
Electronic Submission,'' which is available on the agency's public Web 
site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html. Participants 
may attempt to use other software not listed on the Web site, but 
should note that the NRC's E-Filing system does not support unlisted 
software, and the NRC Meta System Help Desk will not be able to offer 
assistance in using unlisted software.
    If a participant is electronically submitting a document to the NRC 
in accordance with the E-Filing rule, the participant must file the 
document using the NRC's online, Web-based submission form. In order to 
serve documents through the Electronic Information Exchange System, 
users will be required to install a Web browser plug-in from the NRC's 
Web site. Further information on the Web-based submission form, 
including the installation of the Web browser plug-in, is available on 
the NRC's public Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html.
    Once a participant has obtained a digital ID certificate and a 
docket has been created, the participant can then submit a request for 
hearing or petition for leave to intervene. Submissions should be in 
Portable Document Format (PDF) in accordance with NRC guidance 
available on the NRC's public Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html. A filing is considered complete at the time the 
documents are submitted through the NRC's E-Filing system. To be 
timely, an electronic filing must be submitted to the E-Filing system 
no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. Upon receipt of 
a transmission, the E-Filing system time-stamps the document and sends 
the submitter an email notice confirming receipt of the document. The 
E-Filing system also distributes an email notice that provides access 
to the document to the NRC's Office of the General Counsel and any 
others who have advised the Office of the Secretary that they wish to 
participate in the proceeding, so that the filer need not serve the 
documents on those participants separately. Therefore, applicants and 
other participants (or their counsel or representative) must apply for 
and receive a digital ID certificate before a hearing request/petition 
to intervene is filed so that they can obtain access to the document 
via the E-Filing system.
    A person filing electronically using the NRC's adjudicatory E-
Filing system may seek assistance by contacting the NRC Meta System 
Help Desk through the ``Contact Us'' link located on the NRC's public 
Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html, by email to 
[email protected], or by a toll-free call at 1-866-672-7640. The 
NRC Meta System Help Desk is available between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., 
Eastern Time, Monday through Friday, excluding government holidays.
    Participants who believe that they have a good cause for not 
submitting documents electronically must file an exemption request, in 
accordance with 10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper filing 
requesting authorization to continue to submit documents in paper 
format. Such filings must be submitted by: (1) First class mail 
addressed to the Office of the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attention: 
Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff; or (2) courier, express mail, or 
expedited delivery service to the Office of the Secretary, Sixteenth 
Floor, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland, 20852, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff. 
Participants filing a document in this manner are responsible for 
serving the document on all other participants. Filing is considered 
complete by first-class mail as of the time of deposit in the mail, or 
by courier, express mail, or expedited delivery service upon depositing 
the document with the provider of the service. A presiding officer, 
having granted an exemption request from using E-Filing, may require a 
participant or party to use E-Filing if the presiding officer 
subsequently determines that the reason for granting the exemption from 
use of E-Filing no longer exists.
    Documents submitted in adjudicatory proceedings will appear in the 
NRC's electronic hearing docket which is available to the public at 
http://ehd1.nrc.gov/ehd/, unless excluded pursuant to an order of the 
Commission, or the presiding officer. Participants are requested not to 
include personal privacy information, such as social security numbers, 
home addresses, or home phone numbers in their filings, unless an NRC 
regulation or other law requires submission of such information. 
However, in some instances, a request to intervene will

[[Page 39458]]

require including information on local residence in order to 
demonstrate a proximity assertion of interest in the proceeding. With 
respect to copyrighted works, except for limited excerpts that serve 
the purpose of the adjudicatory filings and would constitute a Fair Use 
application, participants are requested not to include copyrighted 
materials in their submission.
    For further details with respect to this action, see the 
application for license amendment dated May 26, 2015.
    Attorney for licensee: Ms. Kathryn M. Sutton, Morgan, Lewis & 
Bockius LLC, 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20004-2514.
    NRC Branch Chief: Paul Kallan.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 1st day of July 2015.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Paul Kallan,
Acting Branch Chief, Licensing Branch 4, Division of New Reactor 
Licensing, Office of New Reactors.
[FR Doc. 2015-16796 Filed 7-8-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
39456 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 131 / Thursday, July 9, 2015 / Notices

is not adversely affected by the proposed comment period such that failure to act be raised or controverted, as well as a
change. in a timely way would result, for brief explanation of the basis for the
Therefore, the proposed amendment does example, in derating or shutdown of the contention. Additionally, the requestor/
not create the possibility of a new or different
facility. Should the Commission take petitioner must demonstrate that the
kind of accident from any accident
previously evaluated. action prior to the expiration of either issue raised by each contention is
3. Does the proposed change involve a the comment period or the notice within the scope of the proceeding and
significant reduction in a margin of safety? period, it will publish in the Federal is material to the findings that the NRC
Response: No. Register a notice of issuance. Should the must make to support the granting of a
The AWS codes are consensus standards Commission make a final No Significant license amendment in response to the
written, revised, and approved by industry Hazards Consideration Determination, application. The hearing request or
experts experienced in welding and weld any hearing will take place after petition must also include a concise
design. The proposed change adds AWS
issuance. The Commission expects that statement of the alleged facts or expert
D1.1–2000 to the list of applicable codes and
standards in the UFSAR and adds the need to take this action will occur opinion that support the contention and
supplemental provisions consistent with very infrequently. on which the requestor/petitioner
AWS D1.1–2010. The 2000 edition includes intends to rely at the hearing, together
II. Opportunity To Request a Hearing
criteria that consider directionality in the with references to those specific sources
and Petition for Leave To Intervene
weld, which allows for an increase factor on and documents. The hearing request or
structural fillet weld strength relative to the Within 60 days after the date of petition must provide sufficient
angle of load direction. Supplemental publication of this Federal Register information to show that a genuine
provisions are added to the provisions in notice, any person whose interest may dispute exists with the applicant on a
AWS D1.1–2000 for the application of be affected by this proceeding and who
directionality for linear fillet weld groups
material issue of law or fact, including
desires to participate as a party in the references to specific portions of the
concentrically loaded in-plane to the axis of
the weld that include elements oriented both
proceeding must file a written request application for amendment that the
longitudinally and transversely to the for hearing or a petition for leave to petitioner disputes and the supporting
direction of applied load to address intervene specifying the contentions reasons for each dispute. If the
deformation of the welds. The change also which the person seeks to have litigated requestor/petitioner believes that the
specifies extension of the application of in the hearing with respect to the application for amendment fails to
directionality provisions to linear and license amendment request. Requests contain information on a relevant matter
concentrically loaded rectangular and for hearing and petitions for leave to as required by law, the requestor/
circular fillet weld groups loaded out-of- intervene shall be filed in accordance
plane to the axis of the weld to supplement
petitioner must identify each failure and
with the NRC’s ‘‘Agency Rules of the supporting reasons for the
the conditions specified in AWS D1.1. These
changes are supported by tests that provide
Practice and Procedure’’ in 10 CFR part requestor’s/petitioner’s belief. Each
the justification for criteria that consider the 2. Interested person(s) should consult a contention must be one which, if
directionality. These changes can be current copy of 10 CFR 2.309, which is proven, would entitle the requestor/
similarly applied to welds in the AP1000 to available at the NRC’s PDR. The NRC’s petitioner to relief. A requestor/
continue to provide the necessary safety regulations are accessible electronically petitioner who does not satisfy these
margin. from the NRC Library on the NRC’s Web requirements for at least one contention
Therefore, the proposed amendment does site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ will not be permitted to participate as a
not involve a significant reduction in a doc-collections/cfr/.
margin of safety.
party.
As required by 10 CFR 2.309, a Those permitted to intervene become
The NRC staff has reviewed the request for hearing or petition for leave parties to the proceeding, subject to any
licensee’s analysis and, based on this to intervene must set forth with limitations in the order granting leave to
review, it appears that the three particularity the interest of the intervene, and have the opportunity to
standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are petitioner in the proceeding and how participate fully in the conduct of the
satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff that interest may be affected by the hearing with respect to resolution of
proposes to determine that the license results of the proceeding. The hearing that person’s admitted contentions,
amendment request involves a No request or petition must specifically including the opportunity to present
Significant Hazards Consideration. explain the reasons why intervention evidence and to submit a cross-
The NRC is seeking public comments should be permitted, with particular examination plan for cross-examination
on this proposed determination that the reference to the following general of witnesses, consistent with NRC’s
license amendment request involves no requirements: (1) The name, address, regulations, policies, and procedures.
significant hazards consideration. Any and telephone number of the requestor The Atomic Safety and Licensing Board
comments received within 30 days after or petitioner; (2) the nature of the will set the time and place for any
the date of publication of this notice requestor’s/petitioner’s right under the prehearing conferences and evidentiary
will be considered in making any final Act to be made a party to the hearings, and the appropriate notices
determination. proceeding; (3) the nature and extent of will be provided.
Normally, the Commission will not the requestor’s/petitioner’s property, Hearing requests or petitions for leave
issue the amendment until the financial, or other interest in the to intervene must be filed no later than
expiration of 60 days after the date of proceeding; and (4) the possible effect of 60 days from the date of publication of
publication of this notice. The any decision or order which may be this notice. Requests for hearing,
Commission may issue the license entered in the proceeding on the petitions for leave to intervene, and
amendment before expiration of the 60- requestor’s/petitioner’s interest. The motions for leave to file new or
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

day notice period if the Commission hearing request or petition must also amended contentions that are filed after
concludes the amendment involves no include the specific contentions that the the 60-day deadline will not be
significant hazards consideration. In requestor/petitioner seeks to have entertained absent a determination by
addition, the Commission may issue the litigated at the proceeding. the presiding officer that the filing
amendment prior to the expiration of For each contention, the requestor/ demonstrates good cause by satisfying
the 30-day comment period should petitioner must provide a specific the three factors in 10 CFR
circumstances change during the 30-day statement of the issue of law or fact to 2.309(c)(1)(i)–(iii).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:10 Jul 08, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM 09JYN1
39458 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 131 / Thursday, July 9, 2015 / Notices

require including information on local I. Introduction to represent the interests of the general
residence in order to demonstrate a On June 26, 2015, the Postal Service public in this proceeding.
proximity assertion of interest in the filed notice that it has agreed to an 3. Comments are due no later than
proceeding. With respect to copyrighted Amendment to the existing Parcel Select July 10, 2015.
works, except for limited excerpts that & Parcel Return Service Contract 3 4. The Secretary shall arrange for
serve the purpose of the adjudicatory negotiated service agreement approved publication of this order in the Federal
filings and would constitute a Fair Use in this docket.1 In support of its Notice, Register.
application, participants are requested the Postal Service includes a redacted By the Commission.
not to include copyrighted materials in copy of the Amendment. Ruth Ann Abrams,
their submission. On June 30, 2015, Chairman’s Acting Secretary.
For further details with respect to this Information Request No. 1 was issued.2 [FR Doc. 2015–16759 Filed 7–8–15; 8:45 am]
action, see the application for license The Postal Service responded to CHIR BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
amendment dated May 26, 2015. No. 1 on July 1, 2015, and filed the
Attorney for licensee: Ms. Kathryn M. unredacted amendment under seal.3
Sutton, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLC, The Postal Service seeks to incorporate
1111 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
by reference the Application for Non- COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20004–2514. Public Treatment originally filed in this
NRC Branch Chief: Paul Kallan. docket for the protection of information [Release No. 34–75358; File No. SR–
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 1st day that it has filed under seal. Notice at 1. NYSEMKT–2015–45]
of July 2015. The Amendment describes the
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. assignment and delegation rights under
MKT LLC; Notice of Filing and
Paul Kallan, the contract and the package label
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Acting Branch Chief, Licensing Branch 4, indicia that will be valid in the event of
Rule Change Amending the NYSE
Division of New Reactor Licensing, Office of the assignment, delegation, or transfer of
Amex Options Fee Schedule To
New Reactors. the contract.
Discontinue Certain Fees
[FR Doc. 2015–16796 Filed 7–8–15; 8:45 am] The Postal Service intends for the
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P Amendment to become effective one July 2, 2015.
business day after the date that the Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Commission completes its review of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Notice. Id. The Postal Service asserts ‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION that the Amendment will not impair the notice is hereby given that, on June 30,
ability of the contract to comply with 39 2015, NYSE MKT LLC (the ‘‘Exchange’’
[Docket No. CP2012–22; Order No. 2562] U.S.C. 3633. Id. or ‘‘NYSE MKT’’) filed with the
II. Notice of Filings Securities and Exchange Commission
New Postal Product (the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
The Commission invites comments on change as described in Items I, II, and
AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. whether the changes presented in the III below, which Items have been
ACTION: Notice. Postal Service’s Notice are consistent prepared by the self-regulatory
with the policies of 39 U.S.C. 3632, organization. The Commission is
SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a 3633, or 3642, 39 CFR 3015.5, and 39 publishing this notice to solicit
recent Postal Service filing concerning CFR part 3020, subpart B. Comments are comments on the proposed rule change
an Amendment to the existing Parcel due no later than July 10, 2015. The from interested persons.
Select & Parcel Return Service Contract public portions of these filings can be
3 negotiated service agreement. This accessed via the Commission’s Web site I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
notice informs the public of the filing, (http://www.prc.gov). Statement of the Terms of Substance of
invites public comment, and takes other The Commission appoints Lyudmila the Proposed Rule Change
administrative steps. Bzhilyanskaya to represent the interests The Exchange proposes to amend the
DATES: Comments are due: July 10, of the general public (Public NYSE Amex Options Fee Schedule
2015. Representative) in this docket. (‘‘Fee Schedule’’) to discontinue certain
ADDRESSES: Submit comments III. Ordering Paragraphs fees. The Exchange proposes to
electronically via the Commission’s implement the fee change effective July
It is ordered: 1, 2015. The text of the proposed rule
Filing Online system at http:// 1. The Commission reopens Docket
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit change is available on the Exchange’s
No. CP2012–22 for consideration of Web site at www.nyse.com, at the
comments electronically should contact matters raised by the Postal Service’s
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER principal office of the Exchange, and at
Notice. the Commission’s Public Reference
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, the Room.
telephone for advice on filing
Commission appoints Lyudmila
alternatives. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Bzhilyanskaya to serve as an officer of
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: the Commission (Public Representative) Statement of the Purpose of, and
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

202–789–6820. 1 Notice of United States Postal Service of Change
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Amendment to Parcel Select and Parcel Return In its filing with the Commission, the
Service Contract 3, with Portions Filed Under Seal,
June 26, 2015 (Notice). self-regulatory organization included
Table of Contents
2 Chairman’s Information Request No. 1, June 30,
I. Introduction 2015 (CHIR No. 1). 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
II. Notice of Commission Action 3 Response of United States Postal Service to 2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
III. Ordering Paragraphs Chairman’s Information Request No. 1, July 1, 2015. 3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:10 Jul 08, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM 09JYN1
Document Created: 2018-02-23 09:13:59
Document Modified: 2018-02-23 09:13:59
Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
Action		License amendment application; opportunity to comment, request a hearing, and petition for leave to intervene.
Dates		Submit comments by August 10, 2015. Requests for a hearing or petition for leave to intervene must be filed by September 8, 2015.
Contact		Chandu Patel, Office of New Reactors, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-3025; email: [email protected]
FR Citation		80 FR 39454