80 FR 43015 - Safety Zone; Maritime Museum Party, San Diego Bay; San Diego, CA

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 139 (July 21, 2015)

Page Range		43015-43017
FR Document		2015-17843

The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the navigable waters of the San Diego Bay for a fireworks display on the evening of July 23, 2015. This action is necessary to provide for the safety of the participants, crew, spectators, participating vessels, and other vessels and users of the waterway. Persons and vessels are prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or anchoring within this safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or his designated representative.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 139 (Tuesday, July 21, 2015)

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 139 (Tuesday, July 21, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 43015-43017]
From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-17843]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2015-0647]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Maritime Museum Party, San Diego Bay; San Diego, CA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the
navigable waters of the San Diego Bay for a fireworks display on the
evening of July 23, 2015. This action is necessary to provide for the
safety of the participants, crew, spectators, participating vessels,
and other vessels and users of the waterway. Persons and vessels are
prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or anchoring within
this safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or his
designated representative.

DATES: This rule is effective from 8:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. on July 23,
2015.

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
[USCG-2015-0647]. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Petty Officer Nick Bateman, Waterways Management, U.S.
Coast Guard Sector San Diego; telephone (619) 278-7656, email D11-PF-MarineEventsSanDiego@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Acronyms

DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
TFR Temporary Final Rule

A. Regulatory History and Information

The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule safety zone
for a planned fireworks show on San Diego Bay without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.''
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with
respect to this rule because publishing an NPRM would be impracticable
because immediate action is needed to minimize potential danger to the
participants and the public during the event. Furthermore, the
necessary information to determine whether the marine event poses a
threat to persons and vessels was provided 15 days before the event,
which is insufficient time to publish an NPRM. Because fireworks barges
on the navigable waterways poses significant risk to public safety and
property and the likely combination of large numbers of recreation
vessels and congested waterways could easily result in serious injuries
or fatalities, this safety zone is necessary to safeguard spectators,
vessels and the event participants. For the safety concerns noted, it
is important to have these regulations in effect during the event and
impracticable to delay the regulations.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. For these same reasons, the Coast
Guard finds good cause for implementing this rule less than thirty days
before the effective July 23, 2015.

B. Basis and Purpose

The legal basis and authorities for this temporary rule are found
in 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and
160.5; and Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1, which
collectively authorize the Coast Guard to propose, establish, and
define regulatory safety zones.
The Coast Guard believes establishing a temporary safety zone on
the navigable waters of the San Diego Bay is necessary to ensure public
safety for the fireworks display. A temporary safety zone will provide
for the safety of the event participants, spectators, safety vessels,
and other public users of the waterway. This event involves a planned
fifteen minute fireworks display on a portion of San Diego Bay.

C. Discussion of the Final Rule

The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone that will
be enforced from 8:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. on July 23, 2015. This safety
zone is necessary to provide for the safety of the event participants,
event spectators, safety patrol craft and to protect other vessels and
users of the waterway. Persons and vessels will be prohibited from
entering into, transiting through, or anchoring within this safety zone
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, or their designated
representative. Before the effective period, the Coast Guard will
publish a local notice to mariners (LNM). Just prior to the event and
during the enforcement of the event, the Coast Guard will issue a
broadcast notice to mariners (BNM) alert via VHF Channel 16.

[[Page 43016]]

This temporary safety zone will be bound by a 600 foot radius of
the fireworks barge, center approximately on the following coordinate
(North American Datum of 1983, World Geodetic System, 1984):
32[deg]43.14 N, 117[deg]10.36 W

D. Regulatory Analyses

We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. We expect the economic
impact of this rule to be so minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation
is unnecessary. This determination is based on the size, location and
limited duration of the safety zone. This zone impacts a small
designated area of the San Diego bay for less than one hour.
Furthermore, vessel traffic can safely transit around the safety zone.

2. Impact on Small Entities

The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of
which may be small entities: The owners or operators of private and
commercial vessels intending to transit or anchor in the impacted
portion of the San Diego Bay from 8:30 p.m. through 9:30 p.m. on July
23, 2015.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. Vessel
traffic can pass safely around the zone. The Coast Guard will publish a
local notice to mariners (LNM) and will issue broadcast notice to
mariners (BNM) alerts via VHF Channel 16 before the safety zone is
enforced.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

4. Collection of Information

This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

5. Federalism

A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.

6. Protest Activities

The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children

We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

13. Technical Standards

This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security

[[Page 43017]]

Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the establishment of a safety zone on
the navigable waters of San Diego Bay. This rule is categorically
excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the
Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis checklist supporting
this determination and a Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.01.

0
2. Add Sec. 165.T11-647 to read as follows:

Sec. 165.T11-647 Safety Zone; Maritime Museum Party; San Diego, CA.

(a) Location. The limits of the safety zone will include all the
navigable waters within 600 feet of the fireworks barge in approximate
position of 32[deg]43.14 N, 117[deg]10.36 W (North American Datum of
1983, World Geodetic System, 1984).
(b) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 8:30
p.m. to 9:30 p.m. on July 23, 2015. If the event concludes prior to the
schedule termination time, the COTP will cease enforcement of this
safety zone and will announce that fact via Broadcast Notice to
Mariners.
(c) Definitions. The following definition applies to this section:
Designated representative means any commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer of the Coast Guard on board Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary,
or local, state, or federal law enforcement vessels who have been
authorized to act on the behalf of the Captain of the Port.
(d) Regulations. (1) Under the general regulations in subpart C of
this part, entry into, transit through or anchoring within this safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port of San
Diego or his designated representative.
(2) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of
the Coast Guard Captain of the Port or his designated representative.
(3) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast Guard or designated patrol
personnel by siren, radio, flashing light or other means, the operator
of a vessel shall proceed as directed.
(4) The Coast Guard may be assisted by other federal, state, or
local agencies in patrol and notification of the regulation.

Dated: July 10, 2015.
J.S. Spaner,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. 2015-17843 Filed 7-20-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

43016 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 139 / Tuesday, July 21, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

This temporary safety zone will be Guard will publish a local notice to 7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
bound by a 600 foot radius of the mariners (LNM) and will issue The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
fireworks barge, center approximately broadcast notice to mariners (BNM) of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
on the following coordinate (North alerts via VHF Channel 16 before the Federal agencies to assess the effects of
American Datum of 1983, World safety zone is enforced. their discretionary regulatory actions. In
Geodetic System, 1984): 32°43.14 N, particular, the Act addresses actions
117°10.36 W 3. Assistance for Small Entities
that may result in the expenditure by a
D. Regulatory Analyses Under section 213(a) of the Small State, local, or tribal government, in the
Business Regulatory Enforcement aggregate, or by the private sector of
We developed this rule after
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
considering numerous statutes and
we want to assist small entities in more in any one year. Though this rule
executive orders related to rulemaking.
understanding this rule. If the rule will not result in such an expenditure,
Below we summarize our analyses
would affect your small business, we do discuss the effects of this rule
based on these statutes and executive
organization, or governmental elsewhere in this preamble.
orders.
jurisdiction and you have questions
1. Regulatory Planning and Review concerning its provisions or options for 8. Taking of Private Property
This rule is not a significant compliance, please contact the person This rule will not cause a taking of
regulatory action under section 3(f) of listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION private property or otherwise have
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory CONTACT, above. taking implications under Executive
Planning and Review, as supplemented Small businesses may send comments Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
by Executive Order 13563, Improving on the actions of Federal employees Interference with Constitutionally
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and who enforce, or otherwise determine Protected Property Rights.
does not require an assessment of compliance with, Federal regulations to 9. Civil Justice Reform
potential costs and benefits under the Small Business and Agriculture
This rule meets applicable standards
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
or under section 1 of Executive Order and the Regional Small Business
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
13563. The Office of Management and Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
minimize litigation, eliminate
Budget has not reviewed it under those Ombudsman evaluates these actions
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Orders. We expect the economic impact annually and rates each agency’s
of this rule to be so minimal that a full responsiveness to small business. If you 10. Protection of Children
Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary. wish to comment on actions by We have analyzed this rule under
This determination is based on the size, employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– Executive Order 13045, Protection of
location and limited duration of the 888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The Children from Environmental Health
safety zone. This zone impacts a small Coast Guard will not retaliate against Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
designated area of the San Diego bay for small entities that question or complain an economically significant rule and
less than one hour. Furthermore, vessel about this rule or any policy or action does not create an environmental risk to
traffic can safely transit around the of the Coast Guard. health or risk to safety that may
safety zone. disproportionately affect children.
4. Collection of Information
2. Impact on Small Entities 11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule will not call for a new
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 This rule does not have tribal
collection of information under the
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, implications under Executive Order
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
requires federal agencies to consider the 13175, Consultation and Coordination
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
potential impact of regulations on small with Indian Tribal Governments,
entities during rulemaking. The term 5. Federalism because it does not have a substantial
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small direct effect on one or more Indian
businesses, not-for-profit organizations A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132, tribes, on the relationship between the
that are independently owned and Federal Government and Indian tribes,
operated and are not dominant in their Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship or on the distribution of power and
fields, and governmental jurisdictions responsibilities between the Federal
with populations of less than 50,000. between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of Government and Indian tribes.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a power and responsibilities among the 12. Energy Effects
significant economic impact on a various levels of government. We have
This action is not a ‘‘significant
substantial number of small entities. analyzed this rule under that Order and
energy action’’ under Executive Order
This rule will affect the following determined that this rule does not have
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
entities, some of which may be small implications for federalism.
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
entities: The owners or operators of 6. Protest Activities Distribution, or Use.
private and commercial vessels
intending to transit or anchor in the The Coast Guard respects the First 13. Technical Standards
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES

impacted portion of the San Diego Bay Amendment rights of protesters. This rule does not use technical
from 8:30 p.m. through 9:30 p.m. on Protesters are asked to contact the standards. Therefore, we did not
July 23, 2015. person listed in the FOR FURTHER consider the use of voluntary consensus
This safety zone will not have a INFORMATION CONTACT section to standards.
significant economic impact on a coordinate protest activities so that your
substantial number of small entities for message can be received without 14. Environment
the following reasons. Vessel traffic can jeopardizing the safety or security of We have analyzed this rule under
pass safely around the zone. The Coast people, places or vessels. Department of Homeland Security

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:53 Jul 20, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\21JYR1.SGM 21JYR1

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 139 / Tuesday, July 21, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 43017

Management Directive 023–01 and Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, or local, I. Introduction
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, state, or federal law enforcement vessels The Postal Accountability and
which guide the Coast Guard in who have been authorized to act on the Enhancement Act (PAEA), Public Law
complying with the National behalf of the Captain of the Port. 109–435, 120 Stat. 3198 (2006),
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (d) Regulations. (1) Under the general authorizes the Commission to develop
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and regulations in subpart C of this part, rules and establish procedures that it
have determined that this action is one entry into, transit through or anchoring deems necessary and proper to carry out
of a category of actions that do not within this safety zone is prohibited Commission functions.1
individually or cumulatively have a unless authorized by the Captain of the On May 4, 2015, the Commission
significant effect on the human Port of San Diego or his designated issued a notice of proposed rulemaking
environment. This rule involves the representative. establishing procedures that would
establishment of a safety zone on the (2) All persons and vessels shall simplify the docket closure process by
navigable waters of San Diego Bay. This comply with the instructions of the permitting automatic closure of a docket
rule is categorically excluded from Coast Guard Captain of the Port or his following a significant period of
further review under paragraph 34(g) of designated representative. inactivity.2 The Notice requested
Figure 2–1 of the Commandant (3) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast comments from interested persons
Instruction. An environmental analysis Guard or designated patrol personnel by regarding the proposed rules. The
checklist supporting this determination siren, radio, flashing light or other Commission received comments from
and a Categorical Exclusion means, the operator of a vessel shall the Postal Service and the Public
Determination are available in the proceed as directed. Representative.3 After consideration of
docket where indicated under (4) The Coast Guard may be assisted the comments submitted, the
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or by other federal, state, or local agencies Commission adopts the proposed rules,
information that may lead to the in patrol and notification of the modified as described below.
discovery of a significant environmental regulation.
impact from this rule. II. Comments
Dated: July 10, 2015.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 J.S. Spaner, The Postal Service and Public
Representative offered positive
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Diego. comments and suggested revisions with
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
respect to the Commission’s proposed
requirements, Security measures, [FR Doc. 2015–17843 Filed 7–20–15; 8:45 am]
rules.
Waterways. BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
The Postal Service agrees that an
For the reasons discussed in the automatic closure procedure would
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 promote efficient docket management
CFR part 165 as follows: and provide clarity for the public
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
because it would clear out items listed
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
39 CFR Part 3001 on the Commission’s Web site. Postal
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
Service Comments at 1. However, the
■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 Postal Service has concerns that, in
[Docket No. RM2015–8; Order No. 2589]
continues to read as follows: certain proceedings, a docket may be
Automatic Docket Closure Procedures automatically closed due to 12
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; consecutive months of inactivity prior
Department of Homeland Security Delegation AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. to a final order being issued by the
No. 0170.01. ACTION: Final rule. Commission. Id. at 1–2. The Postal
Service recommends proposed rule
■ 2. Add § 165.T11–647 to read as SUMMARY: The Commission is issuing a 3001.44(a) be revised to indicate that if
follows: set of final rules establishing new the final order in a docket is pending,
§ 165.T11–647 Safety Zone; Maritime procedures concerning automatic it will not be subject to automatic
Museum Party; San Diego, CA. closure of Commission dockets after an closure. Id. at 2.
(a) Location. The limits of the safety extended period of docket inactivity. In addition, the Postal Service
zone will include all the navigable The rules will permit a simplified recommends that the Commission
waters within 600 feet of the fireworks docket closure process. Relative to the provide notice to the public of the
barge in approximate position of proposed rules, some of the changes are impending docket closure at least 30
32°43.14 N, 117°10.36 W (North substantive and others are minor and days prior to the automatic closure date.
American Datum of 1983, World non-substantive. Id. The Postal Service also suggests that
Geodetic System, 1984). DATES: Effective August 20, 2015. a motion to stay automatic closure be
(b) Enforcement period. This section FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
filed at least 15 days prior to closing,
will be enforced from 8:30 p.m. to 9:30 David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at rather than 10 days prior to closing, in
p.m. on July 23, 2015. If the event 202–789–6820. order to provide parties ample time to
concludes prior to the schedule SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 1 See 39 U.S.C. 503; see also Postal
termination time, the COTP will cease
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Reorganization Act, Public Law 91–375, 84 Stat.
enforcement of this safety zone and will Regulatory History 759 (1970), at section 3603.
announce that fact via Broadcast Notice 80 FR 26517, May 8, 2015 2 Docket No. RM2015–8, Order No. 2465, Notice

to Mariners. of Proposed Rulemaking Regarding Automatic
(c) Definitions. The following Table of Contents Closure of Inactive Dockets, May 4, 2015 (Notice);
definition applies to this section: see also 80 FR 26517 (May 8, 2015).
I. Introduction 3 See Initial Comments of the United States Postal
Designated representative means any II. Comments Service, June 8, 2015 (Postal Service Comments);
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer III. Commission Analysis Public Representative Comments, June 8, 2015 (PR
of the Coast Guard on board Coast IV. Ordering Paragraphs Comments).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:53 Jul 20, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\21JYR1.SGM 21JYR1

Document Created: 2018-02-23 09:23:03
Document Modified: 2018-02-23 09:23:03

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective from 8:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. on July 23, 2015.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, call or email Petty Officer Nick Bateman, Waterways Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Diego; telephone (619) 278-7656, email D11-PF- [email protected] If you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
FR Citation		80 FR 43015
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

80 FR 43015 - Safety Zone; Maritime Museum Party, San Diego Bay; San Diego, CA

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 139 (July 21, 2015)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard