80_FR_44522 80 FR 44379 - Announcement of Requirements and Registration for a Prize Competition Seeking: New Concepts for Remote Fish Detection

80 FR 44379 - Announcement of Requirements and Registration for a Prize Competition Seeking: New Concepts for Remote Fish Detection

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 143 (July 27, 2015)

Page Range44379-44382
FR Document2015-18157

The Bureau of Reclamation, in collaboration with other Federal agencies (U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration-National Marine Fisheries Service, and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers) are announcing a prize competition looking for detailed concepts for the next generation of fish tracking methods, beyond what is available and in the literature today. Emphasis is on accurate tracking of many fish, ease of use, longevity, and low cost.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 143 (Monday, July 27, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 143 (Monday, July 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44379-44382]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-18157]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Reclamation

[RR0810000, 15XR0680A1, RY.1541CH20.1430001]


Announcement of Requirements and Registration for a Prize 
Competition Seeking: New Concepts for Remote Fish Detection

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Reclamation, in collaboration with other Federal 
agencies (U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration-National Marine 
Fisheries Service, and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers) are announcing a 
prize competition looking for detailed concepts for the next generation 
of fish tracking methods, beyond what is available and in the 
literature today. Emphasis is on accurate tracking of many fish, ease 
of use, longevity, and low cost.

DATES: Listed below are the specific dates pertaining to this prize 
competition:
    1. Submission period begins on July 27, 2015.
    2. Submission period ends on August 26, 2015.
    3. Judging period ends on October 26, 2015.
    4. Winners announced by November 9, 2015.

ADDRESSES: The New Concepts for Remote Fish Detection Prize Competition 
will be posted on the following crowd-sourcing platforms where Solvers 
can register for this prize competition:
    1. The Water Pavilion located at the InnoCentive Challenge Center: 
https://www.innocentive.com/ar/challenge/browse.
    2. U.S. Federal Government Challenge Platform: www.Challenge.gov.
    3. The Nature Open Innovation Pavilion at http://www.nature.com/openinnovation/index.html.
    4. The Scientific American Citizen Science Center at http://www.scientificamerican.com/citizen-science/.
    InnoCentive, Inc. is administering this challenge under a challenge 
support services contract with the Bureau of Reclamation. These Web 
sites will re-direct the Solver community to the InnoCentive Challenge 
Center as the administrator for this prize competition. Additional 
details for this prize competition, including the Challenge Agreement 
specific for this prize competition, can be accessed through any of 
these prize competition web addresses. The Challenge Agreement contains 
more details of the prize competition rules and terms that Solvers must 
agree with to be eligible to compete.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Challenge Manager: Dr. Levi Brekke, 
Chief, Research and Development, Bureau of Reclamation, (303) 445-2494, 
[email protected]; Mr. Chuck Hennig, (303) 445-2134, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Bureau of Reclamation is announcing the 
following prize competition in compliance with 15 U.S. Code 3719, Prize 
Competitions. The ability to track individual or groups of fish is 
central to efforts to recover threatened and endangered fish species, 
and to reduce impacts to at-risk species. Reliable, affordable 
detection and tracking provides vital information about how many fish 
are present, where and why mortality occurs, and where and why species 
thrive. This enables fish recovery program managers to pursue targeted 
and more effective actions that can reduce mortality rates, improve 
habitat, and increase survival rates while continuing to meet the 
mission of the agency--delivery of water and power in the case of 
Reclamation. A successful solution will significantly reduce costs and 
dramatically increase the effectiveness and efficiency of various fish 
recovery efforts led by Federal, state, local, and/or other 
organizations.
    Challenge Summary: There are a number of methods in use today to 
track fish. Common electronic methods include use of acoustic tags, 
radio-telemetry tags, and passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags. 
Different technologies have pros and cons. Tags accurate over long 
distances are often costly and need to be surgically implanted in the 
fish. Low cost tags have long lifetimes, but work over short distances 
and signals are subject to electromagnetic interference, which may 
result in no or inaccurate detections. Since there is no universal or 
``best'' method, the option that best meets the specific needs of the 
fish tracking program objectives is typically selected (e.g. accuracy, 
lifetime of the study, working environments, species being tagged, 
number of and size of fish, available funding, etc.). Current methods 
rely on capture and handling of fish to implant or attach tags, with 
subsequent recaptures or resightings involving elaborate capture or 
corralling methods, which can be complex, costly, and stressful to the 
fish.
    The goal of this Challenge is to generate new concepts for tracking 
fish that advance technologies that meet fish recovery program 
management needs at a reasonable cost. A solution is being pursued 
through a prize competition because the Bureau of Reclamation and the 
collaborating Federal agencies view it beneficial to seek innovative 
solutions from those beyond the usual sources of potential solvers and 
experts that commonly work in the fish recovery management domain. We 
find ourselves often wondering if somebody, somewhere may know a better 
way of tracking and monitoring fish for our purposes than the methods 
we currently use. The prize competition approach enables us to reach a 
new source of potential Solvers to generate new and timely solutions 
that would not likely be accomplished by standard contractual methods.
    This is an Ideation Challenge, which has the following unique 
features:
     There is a guaranteed award. The awards will be paid to 
the best submission(s) as solely determined by the Bureau of 
Reclamation (The Seeker). The total payout will be $20,000, with at 
least one award being no smaller than $5,000 and no award being smaller 
than $2,500.
     ALL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS, IF ANY, IN THE IDEA OR 
CONCEPT DEMONSTRATED BY THE PROPOSED SOLUTION WILL REMAIN WITH THE 
SOLVER. UPON SUBMISSION OF A PROPOSED SOLUTION TO THIS CHALLENGE, EACH 
SOLVER AGREES TO GRANT TO THE SEEKER A ROYALTY-FREE, PERPETUAL, 
IRREVOCABLE, NON-EXCLUSIVE LICENSE TO USE BY OR ON-BEHALF OF THE U.S. 
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ANY INFORMATION INCLUDED IN THIS PROPOSAL IN ANY 
FORUM, OR SUBSEQUENT

[[Page 44380]]

EFFORTS TO FURTHER DEVELOP THE CONCEPT INTO A VIABLE SOLUTION AND TO 
ALLOW OTHERS TO DO SO. NOTWITHSTANDING GRANTING THE SEEKER A PERPETUAL, 
NON-EXCLUSIVE LICENSE FOR THE PROPOSED SOLUTION, THE SOLVER RETAINS 
OWNERSHIP OF THE IDEA OR CONCEPT DEMONSTRATED BY THE PROPOSED SOLUTION.
     The Seeker believes there might be a potential for future 
collaboration with awarded Solver(s), although such collaboration is 
not guaranteed. The Seeker may also encourage Solver(s) to further 
develop and test their winning submissions through subsequent round(s) 
of competition. Solvers should make it clear if they have the ability 
for subsequent design and development phases and would be willing to 
consider future collaborations and/or subsequent competitions.
    Background: The Bureau of Reclamation and other Federal and non-
Federal resource managers require the ability to identify and monitor 
fish and other aquatic animals. Fish, in particular, use different 
habitats, from small streams to deep fast-flowing rivers, and large 
lakes and oceans. A common challenge faced by fish recovery managers is 
the need to monitor movements of free-swimming individual fish without 
repeated capture and handling.
    Telemetry systems currently used to detect and/or track individual 
fish include PIT tag systems (or radio frequency identification) and 
two types of active (battery powered) systems: radio tag and acoustic 
tag.
     PIT tag systems are limited to detecting fish at short 
distances (generally <40 inches for 12 mm tags) and they require 
antennas that must withstand large hydraulic forces. These systems 
transmit and receive very rapidly (e.g. 10-25 milliseconds, depending 
on the system), which means that they are able to detect fish traveling 
quickly (i.e., >40 feet/second) through or over stationary antennas in 
dams, fish ladders, canals, and streams. PIT tags are relatively 
inexpensive (~ $2.00/fish) and can be inserted in fish as small as 2 
inches in length. Because PIT tags do not have a battery and are glass-
encapsulated, they can function and persist throughout the lifetime of 
long-lived fish (10-100 years or more).
     Radio and acoustic telemetry systems have the ability to 
detect fish over large distances (100 feet-1 mile), but transmitters 
are expensive (>$150 each) and most but not all require surgical 
procedures to implant. The battery within the telemetry system 
determines both their size and lifetime. Transmission rate is a 
function of technology--some acoustic tags transmit unique codes in 
<0.1 seconds, while others take close to 10 seconds. Radio tags 
typically transmit codes of 0.2 seconds duration. The duration of 
codes, combined with battery size and power output, limit the life 
expectancy of the tag. This, combined with the greater broadcast range, 
can make it difficult to observe rapid or fine-scale fish movements 
using these tags. In addition, radio and acoustic tags are generally 
limited by environmental conditions, e.g., water depth of tag location, 
salinity, ambient noise from entrained air bubbles, sediment in water, 
and other water quality conditions.
    Information is easily found on the internet concerning state of the 
art fish tagging techniques. A few references are provided in the prize 
competition posting for your information; however, please realize this 
is what is known today, and that the Seeker is looking for new ideas 
and mechanisms beyond the known literature.
    The Challenge: New technology is needed to enable resource managers 
to address important problems at a reasonable cost. Our Challenge is to 
find the next fish monitoring and tracking system. The Solver is not 
limited to the mechanical and physical systems described above. The 
answer could be biological, chemical, physical, mechanical, etc.
    A successful solution significantly reduces costs and dramatically 
increases the effectiveness and efficiency of fish detecting and 
tracking efforts. For the sake of clarity and simplicity, we will 
designate the rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) as the representative 
fish species for this Challenge. If the Solvers need to make 
assumptions about a generalized fish, they can use data for this 
particular representative fish, which can be found on the internet.
    The question is not, ``How do we track a single fish for its 
lifetime'', but ``How do we track thousands of individually 
identifiable fish for extended periods of time cheaply and 
effectively''. Note that there are many criteria that need to be 
considered for tracking fish such as:
     Lifetime of a tag or device (longer is better)
     Size and invasiveness (smaller is better)
     Detection distance (longer is better)
     Quality of detection (high accuracy and high speed is 
better)
     Cost (low is better)
    Solvers need not meet every technical requirement with one new 
concept. Concepts that meet some requirements, but not all, will still 
be eligible for competing for an award. New and novel approaches to the 
tracking of individual identifiable aquatic organisms will be given 
special consideration.
    Things to avoid:
    1. The Seeker is not interested in marginal improvements to current 
fish tagging techniques such as PIT tags, acoustic and radio tags as 
well as other known marking methods, but novel and major improvement in 
any of these would be of interest.
    2. The Seeker is not looking for a review article on fish tagging. 
Only new methods/techniques/technology will be considered that are not 
currently in use for fish tagging.
    Submissions should try to meet the following Technical 
Requirements:
    1. The best device/method/technique would be able to:
    a. Be used for freshwater fish as small as 4 inches in total length 
(if a physical tag is used, it must be less than 5% of the fish's body 
weight).
    b. Detect and identify individual fish from a minimum of 30 feet 
away from detector device throughout the entire water column (up to 30 
feet in depth or laterally).
    c. Detect and identify rapidly moving individual fish with 
detection efficiency >95%, even when in a school or assemblage of like 
or different species that may or may not be similarly tagged or marked.
    d. Be used on a large scale (e.g., if tags used, should be able to 
tag > 1,000 fish/day using two people) and scalable to use in a field 
setting where fish would be marked after capture from rafts, small 
boats, or from banks of water bodies in remote field locations.
    e. Reduce capturing or handling of fish to an original marking or 
tagging event.
    2. The system should not modify the behavior, physiology, genetic, 
phenotypic, growth, survival, or edibility of the fish of interest, or 
other fish and aquatic animals near the fish of interest.
    3. Detection devices should not be susceptible to normal 
electromagnetic interference, which would include overhead power lines, 
turbine motors such as those found at dams, water pumps, outboard and 
inboard motors, transformers, etc.
    4. The method must have performance characteristics as good as or 
better than existing 12-mm PIT tags and existing active acoustic and 
radio tags. These performance characteristics are:
    a. Shedding rates are < 5%.

[[Page 44381]]

    b. Durability is defined as capable of being dropped from a height 
of 4 feet and submersible to a water depth over 300 feet without 
damage.
    c. Longevity > 10 years while in service, but should be > 50 years.
    The following are not required for an award but would be ``nice to 
have''.
    5. The detection device should be portable (i.e., < 50 pounds) and 
capable to be operated by one person.
    6. Detection devices should not be susceptible to any 
electromagnetic interference.
    7. If tags are used (one device per fish), they should be capable 
of mass production to meet demand at a reasonable cost and show promise 
for future miniaturization.
    8. The method is capable of successfully identifying individual 
fish in both freshwater and seawater.
    9. The method is capable of detecting and identifying individual 
fish from a minimum of 100 feet away from the detector device 
throughout the entire water column (up to 100 feet in depth or 
laterally).
    10. The solution is capable of identifying fish as small as 2 
inches in total length, and if a physical tag is used, it should be no 
more than 2% of the fish's body weight.
    Project Deliverables: This is an Ideation Challenge that requires 
only a written proposal to be submitted. At least one solution will be 
deemed the winner.
    The submission should include:
    1. Detailed description of a fish tracking method that is unknown 
in the literature today. The method or system should minimize handling 
and recapture of fish.
    2. Rationale for why the processes/material can meet the Technical 
Requirements listed in the Challenge description. Note: A general 
concept is needed, but is not considered a solution by itself. The 
Solver must describe with a high level of technical detail how the 
system would meet or not meet each of the ``must have'' and ``nice to 
have'' attributes described above. The Solver should expect that their 
submittal will be reviewed by experts in the field of telemetry, 
biology, and multiple fields of engineering. Examples and literature 
references of where similar techniques are used will be helpful as 
evidence.
    3. A list of equipment and material required. Discussion should 
include lifetime of any equipment; size and invasiveness to the fish; 
detection speed, accuracy, and distance; and estimated costs.
    4. Details of any process associated with the tracking system 
(e.g., tagging fish, setting up detectors, etc.) and the time and 
effort required to accomplish tasks.
    5. The Solver needs to describe how deployable and workable the 
system would be under a wide variety of environmental conditions 
including water depths, turbidity, salinity, velocities, and turbulence 
such as those found in small to large streams in the western United 
States.
    Submitted proposals should not include any personal identifying 
information or any information the Solvers do not want to make public 
or consider as their Intellectual Property they do not want to share.
    Judging: After the Challenge deadline, the Seeker will evaluate the 
submissions and make a decision with regards to the winning 
solution(s). All Solvers that submitted a proposal will be notified on 
the status of their submissions. However, no detailed evaluation of 
individual submissions will be provided. Decisions by the Seeker cannot 
be contested.
    Submitted solutions will be evaluated by a Judging Panel composed 
of scientists, engineers, and telemetry experts. The Judging Panel will 
also have consultation access to technical experts outside of their 
expertise, as determined necessary, to evaluate specific submissions. 
The Judging Panel will assess the merits of the solution by the degree 
that they meet the Technical Requirements listed in the Challenge 
description, by the potential utility (i.e., adaptability, scalability, 
readiness for development), and by originality (i.e., novel extension 
of current knowledge).
    Eligibility Rules: To be able to win a prize under this 
competition, an individual or entity must:
    1. Agree to the rules of the competition (15 U.S. Code Sec.  
3719(g)(1));
    2. Be an entity that is incorporated in and maintains a primary 
place of business in the United States, or (b) in the case of an 
individual, a citizen or permanent resident of the United States (15 
U.S. Code Sec.  3719(g)(3));
    3. Not be a Federal entity or Federal employee acting within the 
scope of their employment; (15 U.S. Code Sec.  3719(g)(4));
    4. Assume risks and waive claims against the Federal Government and 
its related entities (15 U.S. Code Sec.  3719(i)(1)(B)); and,
    5. Not use Federal facilities, or consult with Federal employees 
during the competition unless the facilities and employees are made 
available to all individuals and entities participating in the 
competition on an equitable basis.
    The following individuals or entities are not eligible regardless 
of whether they meet the criteria set forth above:
    1. Any individual who employs an evaluator on the Judging Panel or 
otherwise has a material business relationship or affiliation with any 
Judge.
    2. Any individual who is a member of any Judge's immediate family 
or household.
    3. The Seeker, participating organizations, and any advertising 
agency, contractor or other individual or organization involved with 
the design, production, promotion, execution, or distribution of the 
prize competition; all employees, representatives and agents thereof; 
and all members of the immediate family or household of any such 
individual, employee, representative, or agent.
    4. Any individual or entity that uses Federal funds to develop the 
proposed solution now or any time in the past, unless such use is 
consistent with the grant award, or other applicable Federal funds 
awarding document. NOTE: Submissions that propose to improve or adapt 
existing federally funded technologies for the solution sought in this 
prize competition are eligible.
    Consultation: Fish recovery program managers and technical 
specialists from across the Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Geological 
Survey, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration-National Marine Fisheries Service, and U.S. 
Army Corps of Engineers were consulted in identifying and selecting the 
topic of this prize competition. Direct and indirect input from various 
stakeholders and partners associated with the fish recovery program 
efforts by these agencies were also considered. In addition, the Bureau 
of Reclamation maintains an open invitation to the public to suggest 
prize competition topics at www.usbr.gov/research/challenges.
    Public Disclosure: InnoCentive, Inc. is administering this 
challenge under a challenge support services contract with the Bureau 
of Reclamation. Participation is conditioned on providing the data 
required on InnoCentive's online registration form. Personal data will 
be processed in accordance with InnoCentive's Privacy Policy which can 
be located at http://www.innocentive.com/privacy.php. Before including 
your address, phone number, email address, or other personal 
identifying information in your proposal, you should be aware that the 
Seeker is under no obligation to withhold such information from public 
disclosure, and it may be made publicly available at any time. Neither 
InnoCentive nor the Seeker is responsible for human error, theft,

[[Page 44382]]

destruction, or damage to proposed solutions, or other factors beyond 
its reasonable control. Solver assumes any and all risks and waives any 
and all claims against the Seeker and its related entities, except in 
the case of willful misconduct, for any injury, death, damage, or loss 
of property, revenue, or profits, whether direct, indirect, or 
consequential, arising from participation in this competition, whether 
the injury, death, damage, or loss arises through negligence or 
otherwise.

    Dated: June 10, 2015.
Levi Brekke,
Chief, Research and Development.
[FR Doc. 2015-18157 Filed 7-24-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4332-90-P



                                                                              Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 143 / Monday, July 27, 2015 / Notices                                            44379

                                              limited. Individuals who plan to attend                  www.innocentive.com/ar/challenge/                     accurate over long distances are often
                                              and need special assistance should                       browse.                                               costly and need to be surgically
                                              contact the BLM Coordinator as                              2. U.S. Federal Government Challenge               implanted in the fish. Low cost tags
                                              provided above. Persons who use a                        Platform: www.Challenge.gov.                          have long lifetimes, but work over short
                                              telecommunications device for the deaf                      3. The Nature Open Innovation                      distances and signals are subject to
                                              (TDD) may call the Federal Information                   Pavilion at http://www.nature.com/                    electromagnetic interference, which
                                              Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339                   openinnovation/index.html.                            may result in no or inaccurate
                                              to contact the above individual during                      4. The Scientific American Citizen                 detections. Since there is no universal
                                              normal business hours. The FIRS is                       Science Center at http://                             or ‘‘best’’ method, the option that best
                                              available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week,                 www.scientificamerican.com/citizen-                   meets the specific needs of the fish
                                              to leave a message or question with the                  science/.                                             tracking program objectives is typically
                                              above individual. You will receive a                        InnoCentive, Inc. is administering this            selected (e.g. accuracy, lifetime of the
                                              reply during normal business hours.                      challenge under a challenge support                   study, working environments, species
                                                                                                       services contract with the Bureau of                  being tagged, number of and size of fish,
                                              Jenifer L. Arnold,                                       Reclamation. These Web sites will re-                 available funding, etc.). Current
                                              Acting District Manager.                                 direct the Solver community to the                    methods rely on capture and handling
                                              [FR Doc. 2015–18305 Filed 7–24–15; 8:45 am]              InnoCentive Challenge Center as the                   of fish to implant or attach tags, with
                                              BILLING CODE 4310–GG–P                                   administrator for this prize competition.             subsequent recaptures or resightings
                                                                                                       Additional details for this prize                     involving elaborate capture or corralling
                                                                                                       competition, including the Challenge                  methods, which can be complex, costly,
                                              DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR                               Agreement specific for this prize                     and stressful to the fish.
                                                                                                       competition, can be accessed through                     The goal of this Challenge is to
                                              Bureau of Reclamation                                    any of these prize competition web                    generate new concepts for tracking fish
                                              [RR0810000, 15XR0680A1,                                  addresses. The Challenge Agreement                    that advance technologies that meet fish
                                              RY.1541CH20.1430001]                                     contains more details of the prize                    recovery program management needs at
                                                                                                       competition rules and terms that Solvers              a reasonable cost. A solution is being
                                              Announcement of Requirements and                         must agree with to be eligible to                     pursued through a prize competition
                                              Registration for a Prize Competition                     compete.                                              because the Bureau of Reclamation and
                                              Seeking: New Concepts for Remote                                                                               the collaborating Federal agencies view
                                                                                                       FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                              Fish Detection                                                                                                 it beneficial to seek innovative solutions
                                                                                                       Challenge Manager: Dr. Levi Brekke,
                                                                                                                                                             from those beyond the usual sources of
                                              AGENCY:   Bureau of Reclamation,                         Chief, Research and Development,
                                                                                                                                                             potential solvers and experts that
                                              Interior.                                                Bureau of Reclamation, (303) 445–2494,
                                                                                                                                                             commonly work in the fish recovery
                                              ACTION: Notice.                                          lbrekke@usbr.gov; Mr. Chuck Hennig,
                                                                                                                                                             management domain. We find ourselves
                                                                                                       (303) 445–2134, chennig@usbr.gov.
                                              SUMMARY:   The Bureau of Reclamation,                                                                          often wondering if somebody,
                                                                                                       SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The                        somewhere may know a better way of
                                              in collaboration with other Federal                      Bureau of Reclamation is announcing
                                              agencies (U.S. Geological Survey, U.S.                                                                         tracking and monitoring fish for our
                                                                                                       the following prize competition in                    purposes than the methods we currently
                                              Fish and Wildlife Service, National                      compliance with 15 U.S. Code 3719,                    use. The prize competition approach
                                              Oceanic and Atmospheric                                  Prize Competitions. The ability to track              enables us to reach a new source of
                                              Administration-National Marine                           individual or groups of fish is central to            potential Solvers to generate new and
                                              Fisheries Service, and U.S. Army Corps                   efforts to recover threatened and                     timely solutions that would not likely
                                              of Engineers) are announcing a prize                     endangered fish species, and to reduce                be accomplished by standard
                                              competition looking for detailed                         impacts to at-risk species. Reliable,                 contractual methods.
                                              concepts for the next generation of fish                 affordable detection and tracking                        This is an Ideation Challenge, which
                                              tracking methods, beyond what is                         provides vital information about how                  has the following unique features:
                                              available and in the literature today.                   many fish are present, where and why                     • There is a guaranteed award. The
                                              Emphasis is on accurate tracking of                      mortality occurs, and where and why                   awards will be paid to the best
                                              many fish, ease of use, longevity, and                   species thrive. This enables fish                     submission(s) as solely determined by
                                              low cost.                                                recovery program managers to pursue                   the Bureau of Reclamation (The Seeker).
                                              DATES: Listed below are the specific                     targeted and more effective actions that              The total payout will be $20,000, with
                                              dates pertaining to this prize                           can reduce mortality rates, improve                   at least one award being no smaller than
                                              competition:                                             habitat, and increase survival rates                  $5,000 and no award being smaller than
                                                 1. Submission period begins on July                   while continuing to meet the mission of               $2,500.
                                              27, 2015.                                                the agency—delivery of water and                         • ALL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
                                                 2. Submission period ends on August                   power in the case of Reclamation. A                   RIGHTS, IF ANY, IN THE IDEA OR
                                              26, 2015.                                                successful solution will significantly                CONCEPT DEMONSTRATED BY THE
                                                 3. Judging period ends on October 26,                 reduce costs and dramatically increase                PROPOSED SOLUTION WILL REMAIN
                                              2015.                                                    the effectiveness and efficiency of                   WITH THE SOLVER. UPON
                                                 4. Winners announced by November                      various fish recovery efforts led by                  SUBMISSION OF A PROPOSED
                                              9, 2015.                                                 Federal, state, local, and/or other                   SOLUTION TO THIS CHALLENGE,
                                              ADDRESSES: The New Concepts for                          organizations.                                        EACH SOLVER AGREES TO GRANT
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                              Remote Fish Detection Prize                                 Challenge Summary: There are a                     TO THE SEEKER A ROYALTY–FREE,
                                              Competition will be posted on the                        number of methods in use today to track               PERPETUAL, IRREVOCABLE, NON–
                                              following crowd-sourcing platforms                       fish. Common electronic methods                       EXCLUSIVE LICENSE TO USE BY OR
                                              where Solvers can register for this prize                include use of acoustic tags, radio-                  ON–BEHALF OF THE U.S. FEDERAL
                                              competition:                                             telemetry tags, and passive integrated                GOVERNMENT ANY INFORMATION
                                                 1. The Water Pavilion located at the                  transponder (PIT) tags. Different                     INCLUDED IN THIS PROPOSAL IN
                                              InnoCentive Challenge Center: https://                   technologies have pros and cons. Tags                 ANY FORUM, OR SUBSEQUENT


                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:58 Jul 24, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00057   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM   27JYN1


                                              44380                           Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 143 / Monday, July 27, 2015 / Notices

                                              EFFORTS TO FURTHER DEVELOP THE                           Transmission rate is a function of                    Concepts that meet some requirements,
                                              CONCEPT INTO A VIABLE SOLUTION                           technology—some acoustic tags transmit                but not all, will still be eligible for
                                              AND TO ALLOW OTHERS TO DO SO.                            unique codes in <0.1 seconds, while                   competing for an award. New and novel
                                              NOTWITHSTANDING GRANTING THE                             others take close to 10 seconds. Radio                approaches to the tracking of individual
                                              SEEKER A PERPETUAL, NON–                                 tags typically transmit codes of 0.2                  identifiable aquatic organisms will be
                                              EXCLUSIVE LICENSE FOR THE                                seconds duration. The duration of                     given special consideration.
                                              PROPOSED SOLUTION, THE SOLVER                            codes, combined with battery size and                    Things to avoid:
                                              RETAINS OWNERSHIP OF THE IDEA                            power output, limit the life expectancy                  1. The Seeker is not interested in
                                              OR CONCEPT DEMONSTRATED BY                               of the tag. This, combined with the                   marginal improvements to current fish
                                              THE PROPOSED SOLUTION.                                   greater broadcast range, can make it                  tagging techniques such as PIT tags,
                                                 • The Seeker believes there might be                  difficult to observe rapid or fine-scale              acoustic and radio tags as well as other
                                              a potential for future collaboration with                fish movements using these tags. In                   known marking methods, but novel and
                                              awarded Solver(s), although such                         addition, radio and acoustic tags are                 major improvement in any of these
                                              collaboration is not guaranteed. The                     generally limited by environmental                    would be of interest.
                                              Seeker may also encourage Solver(s) to                   conditions, e.g., water depth of tag                     2. The Seeker is not looking for a
                                              further develop and test their winning                   location, salinity, ambient noise from                review article on fish tagging. Only new
                                              submissions through subsequent                           entrained air bubbles, sediment in                    methods/techniques/technology will be
                                              round(s) of competition. Solvers should                  water, and other water quality                        considered that are not currently in use
                                              make it clear if they have the ability for               conditions.                                           for fish tagging.
                                              subsequent design and development                           Information is easily found on the                    Submissions should try to meet the
                                              phases and would be willing to consider                  internet concerning state of the art fish             following Technical Requirements:
                                              future collaborations and/or subsequent                  tagging techniques. A few references are                 1. The best device/method/technique
                                              competitions.                                            provided in the prize competition                     would be able to:
                                                 Background: The Bureau of                             posting for your information; however,                   a. Be used for freshwater fish as small
                                              Reclamation and other Federal and non-                   please realize this is what is known                  as 4 inches in total length (if a physical
                                              Federal resource managers require the                    today, and that the Seeker is looking for             tag is used, it must be less than 5% of
                                              ability to identify and monitor fish and                 new ideas and mechanisms beyond the                   the fish’s body weight).
                                              other aquatic animals. Fish, in                          known literature.                                        b. Detect and identify individual fish
                                              particular, use different habitats, from                    The Challenge: New technology is                   from a minimum of 30 feet away from
                                              small streams to deep fast-flowing                       needed to enable resource managers to
                                              rivers, and large lakes and oceans. A                                                                          detector device throughout the entire
                                                                                                       address important problems at a                       water column (up to 30 feet in depth or
                                              common challenge faced by fish                           reasonable cost. Our Challenge is to find
                                              recovery managers is the need to                                                                               laterally).
                                                                                                       the next fish monitoring and tracking                    c. Detect and identify rapidly moving
                                              monitor movements of free-swimming                       system. The Solver is not limited to the
                                              individual fish without repeated capture                                                                       individual fish with detection efficiency
                                                                                                       mechanical and physical systems                       >95%, even when in a school or
                                              and handling.                                            described above. The answer could be
                                                 Telemetry systems currently used to                                                                         assemblage of like or different species
                                                                                                       biological, chemical, physical,                       that may or may not be similarly tagged
                                              detect and/or track individual fish                      mechanical, etc.
                                              include PIT tag systems (or radio                                                                              or marked.
                                                                                                          A successful solution significantly                   d. Be used on a large scale (e.g., if tags
                                              frequency identification) and two types                  reduces costs and dramatically increases
                                              of active (battery powered) systems:                                                                           used, should be able to tag > 1,000 fish/
                                                                                                       the effectiveness and efficiency of fish              day using two people) and scalable to
                                              radio tag and acoustic tag.                              detecting and tracking efforts. For the
                                                 • PIT tag systems are limited to                                                                            use in a field setting where fish would
                                                                                                       sake of clarity and simplicity, we will               be marked after capture from rafts, small
                                              detecting fish at short distances
                                                                                                       designate the rainbow trout                           boats, or from banks of water bodies in
                                              (generally <40 inches for 12 mm tags)
                                                                                                       (Oncorhynchus mykiss) as the                          remote field locations.
                                              and they require antennas that must
                                                                                                       representative fish species for this                     e. Reduce capturing or handling of
                                              withstand large hydraulic forces. These
                                                                                                       Challenge. If the Solvers need to make                fish to an original marking or tagging
                                              systems transmit and receive very
                                                                                                       assumptions about a generalized fish,                 event.
                                              rapidly (e.g. 10–25 milliseconds,
                                                                                                       they can use data for this particular                    2. The system should not modify the
                                              depending on the system), which means
                                                                                                       representative fish, which can be found               behavior, physiology, genetic,
                                              that they are able to detect fish traveling
                                                                                                       on the internet.                                      phenotypic, growth, survival, or
                                              quickly (i.e., >40 feet/second) through                     The question is not, ‘‘How do we
                                              or over stationary antennas in dams, fish                                                                      edibility of the fish of interest, or other
                                                                                                       track a single fish for its lifetime’’, but
                                              ladders, canals, and streams. PIT tags                                                                         fish and aquatic animals near the fish of
                                                                                                       ‘‘How do we track thousands of
                                              are relatively inexpensive (∼ $2.00/fish)                                                                      interest.
                                                                                                       individually identifiable fish for
                                              and can be inserted in fish as small as                                                                           3. Detection devices should not be
                                                                                                       extended periods of time cheaply and
                                              2 inches in length. Because PIT tags do                                                                        susceptible to normal electromagnetic
                                                                                                       effectively’’. Note that there are many
                                              not have a battery and are glass-                                                                              interference, which would include
                                                                                                       criteria that need to be considered for
                                              encapsulated, they can function and                                                                            overhead power lines, turbine motors
                                                                                                       tracking fish such as:
                                              persist throughout the lifetime of long-                    • Lifetime of a tag or device (longer              such as those found at dams, water
                                              lived fish (10–100 years or more).                       is better)                                            pumps, outboard and inboard motors,
                                                 • Radio and acoustic telemetry                           • Size and invasiveness (smaller is                transformers, etc.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                              systems have the ability to detect fish                  better)                                                  4. The method must have
                                              over large distances (100 feet-1 mile),                     • Detection distance (longer is better)            performance characteristics as good as
                                              but transmitters are expensive (>$150                       • Quality of detection (high accuracy              or better than existing 12-mm PIT tags
                                              each) and most but not all require                       and high speed is better)                             and existing active acoustic and radio
                                              surgical procedures to implant. The                         • Cost (low is better)                             tags. These performance characteristics
                                              battery within the telemetry system                         Solvers need not meet every technical              are:
                                              determines both their size and lifetime.                 requirement with one new concept.                        a. Shedding rates are < 5%.


                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:58 Jul 24, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00058   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM   27JYN1


                                                                              Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 143 / Monday, July 27, 2015 / Notices                                            44381

                                                 b. Durability is defined as capable of                time and effort required to accomplish                   1. Any individual who employs an
                                              being dropped from a height of 4 feet                    tasks.                                                evaluator on the Judging Panel or
                                              and submersible to a water depth over                      5. The Solver needs to describe how                 otherwise has a material business
                                              300 feet without damage.                                 deployable and workable the system                    relationship or affiliation with any
                                                 c. Longevity > 10 years while in                      would be under a wide variety of                      Judge.
                                              service, but should be > 50 years.                       environmental conditions including                       2. Any individual who is a member of
                                                 The following are not required for an                 water depths, turbidity, salinity,                    any Judge’s immediate family or
                                              award but would be ‘‘nice to have’’.                     velocities, and turbulence such as those              household.
                                                 5. The detection device should be                     found in small to large streams in the                   3. The Seeker, participating
                                              portable (i.e., < 50 pounds) and capable                 western United States.                                organizations, and any advertising
                                              to be operated by one person.                              Submitted proposals should not                      agency, contractor or other individual or
                                                 6. Detection devices should not be                    include any personal identifying                      organization involved with the design,
                                              susceptible to any electromagnetic                       information or any information the                    production, promotion, execution, or
                                              interference.                                            Solvers do not want to make public or                 distribution of the prize competition; all
                                                 7. If tags are used (one device per                   consider as their Intellectual Property               employees, representatives and agents
                                              fish), they should be capable of mass                    they do not want to share.                            thereof; and all members of the
                                              production to meet demand at a                             Judging: After the Challenge deadline,              immediate family or household of any
                                              reasonable cost and show promise for                     the Seeker will evaluate the submissions              such individual, employee,
                                              future miniaturization.                                  and make a decision with regards to the               representative, or agent.
                                                 8. The method is capable of                           winning solution(s). All Solvers that                    4. Any individual or entity that uses
                                              successfully identifying individual fish                 submitted a proposal will be notified on              Federal funds to develop the proposed
                                              in both freshwater and seawater.                         the status of their submissions.                      solution now or any time in the past,
                                                 9. The method is capable of detecting                 However, no detailed evaluation of                    unless such use is consistent with the
                                              and identifying individual fish from a                   individual submissions will be                        grant award, or other applicable Federal
                                              minimum of 100 feet away from the                        provided. Decisions by the Seeker                     funds awarding document. NOTE:
                                              detector device throughout the entire                    cannot be contested.                                  Submissions that propose to improve or
                                              water column (up to 100 feet in depth                      Submitted solutions will be evaluated               adapt existing federally funded
                                              or laterally).                                           by a Judging Panel composed of                        technologies for the solution sought in
                                                 10. The solution is capable of                        scientists, engineers, and telemetry                  this prize competition are eligible.
                                              identifying fish as small as 2 inches in                 experts. The Judging Panel will also                     Consultation: Fish recovery program
                                              total length, and if a physical tag is                   have consultation access to technical                 managers and technical specialists from
                                              used, it should be no more than 2% of                    experts outside of their expertise, as                across the Bureau of Reclamation, U.S.
                                              the fish’s body weight.                                  determined necessary, to evaluate                     Geological Survey, U.S. Fish and
                                                 Project Deliverables: This is an                      specific submissions. The Judging Panel               Wildlife Service, National Oceanic and
                                              Ideation Challenge that requires only a                  will assess the merits of the solution by             Atmospheric Administration-National
                                              written proposal to be submitted. At                     the degree that they meet the Technical               Marine Fisheries Service, and U.S.
                                              least one solution will be deemed the                    Requirements listed in the Challenge                  Army Corps of Engineers were
                                              winner.                                                  description, by the potential utility (i.e.,          consulted in identifying and selecting
                                                 The submission should include:                        adaptability, scalability, readiness for              the topic of this prize competition.
                                                 1. Detailed description of a fish                     development), and by originality (i.e.,               Direct and indirect input from various
                                              tracking method that is unknown in the                   novel extension of current knowledge).                stakeholders and partners associated
                                              literature today. The method or system                     Eligibility Rules: To be able to win a              with the fish recovery program efforts
                                              should minimize handling and                             prize under this competition, an                      by these agencies were also considered.
                                              recapture of fish.                                       individual or entity must:                            In addition, the Bureau of Reclamation
                                                 2. Rationale for why the processes/                     1. Agree to the rules of the                        maintains an open invitation to the
                                              material can meet the Technical                          competition (15 U.S. Code § 3719(g)(1));              public to suggest prize competition
                                              Requirements listed in the Challenge                       2. Be an entity that is incorporated in             topics at www.usbr.gov/research/
                                              description. Note: A general concept is                  and maintains a primary place of                      challenges.
                                              needed, but is not considered a solution                 business in the United States, or (b) in                 Public Disclosure: InnoCentive, Inc. is
                                              by itself. The Solver must describe with                 the case of an individual, a citizen or               administering this challenge under a
                                              a high level of technical detail how the                 permanent resident of the United States               challenge support services contract with
                                              system would meet or not meet each of                    (15 U.S. Code § 3719(g)(3));                          the Bureau of Reclamation. Participation
                                              the ‘‘must have’’ and ‘‘nice to have’’                     3. Not be a Federal entity or Federal               is conditioned on providing the data
                                              attributes described above. The Solver                   employee acting within the scope of                   required on InnoCentive’s online
                                              should expect that their submittal will                  their employment; (15 U.S. Code                       registration form. Personal data will be
                                              be reviewed by experts in the field of                   § 3719(g)(4));                                        processed in accordance with
                                              telemetry, biology, and multiple fields                    4. Assume risks and waive claims                    InnoCentive’s Privacy Policy which can
                                              of engineering. Examples and literature                  against the Federal Government and its                be located at http://
                                              references of where similar techniques                   related entities (15 U.S. Code                        www.innocentive.com/privacy.php.
                                              are used will be helpful as evidence.                    § 3719(i)(1)(B)); and,                                Before including your address, phone
                                                 3. A list of equipment and material                     5. Not use Federal facilities, or                   number, email address, or other
                                              required. Discussion should include                      consult with Federal employees during                 personal identifying information in your
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                              lifetime of any equipment; size and                      the competition unless the facilities and             proposal, you should be aware that the
                                              invasiveness to the fish; detection                      employees are made available to all                   Seeker is under no obligation to
                                              speed, accuracy, and distance; and                       individuals and entities participating in             withhold such information from public
                                              estimated costs.                                         the competition on an equitable basis.                disclosure, and it may be made publicly
                                                 4. Details of any process associated                    The following individuals or entities               available at any time. Neither
                                              with the tracking system (e.g., tagging                  are not eligible regardless of whether                InnoCentive nor the Seeker is
                                              fish, setting up detectors, etc.) and the                they meet the criteria set forth above:               responsible for human error, theft,


                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:58 Jul 24, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00059   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM   27JYN1


                                              44382                           Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 143 / Monday, July 27, 2015 / Notices

                                              destruction, or damage to proposed                       the Commission’s Electronic Document                  desist order within a commercially
                                              solutions, or other factors beyond its                   Information System (EDIS) at EDIS.3                   reasonable time; and
                                              reasonable control. Solver assumes any                   Hearing-impaired persons are advised                     (v) explain how the requested
                                              and all risks and waives any and all                     that information on this matter can be                remedial orders would impact United
                                              claims against the Seeker and its related                obtained by contacting the
                                                                                                                                                             States consumers.
                                              entities, except in the case of willful                  Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)
                                              misconduct, for any injury, death,                       205–1810.                                                Written submissions must be filed no
                                              damage, or loss of property, revenue, or                 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The                        later than by close of business, eight
                                              profits, whether direct, indirect, or                    Commission has received a complaint                   calendar days after the date of
                                              consequential, arising from                              and a submission pursuant to section                  publication of this notice in the Federal
                                              participation in this competition,                       210.8(b) of the Commission’s Rules of                 Register. There will be further
                                              whether the injury, death, damage, or                    Practice and Procedure filed on behalf                opportunities for comment on the
                                              loss arises through negligence or                        of Trico Products Corporation on July                 public interest after the issuance of any
                                              otherwise.                                               20, 2015. The complaint alleges                       final initial determination in this
                                                Dated: June 10, 2015.                                  violations of section 337 of the Tariff               investigation.
                                              Levi Brekke,                                             Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the                      Persons filing written submissions
                                                                                                       importation into the United States, the
                                              Chief, Research and Development.                                                                               must file the original document
                                                                                                       sale for importation, and the sale within
                                              [FR Doc. 2015–18157 Filed 7–24–15; 8:45 am]                                                                    electronically on or before the deadlines
                                                                                                       the United States after importation of
                                              BILLING CODE 4332–90–P
                                                                                                       certain windscreen wipers and                         stated above and submit 8 true paper
                                                                                                       components thereof. The complaint                     copies to the Office of the Secretary by
                                                                                                       names as respondents Valeo North                      noon the next day pursuant to section
                                              INTERNATIONAL TRADE                                      America, Inc. of Troy, MI and Delmex                  210.4(f) of the Commission’s Rules of
                                              COMMISSION                                               je Juarez S. de R.L. de C.V. of Mexico.               Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
                                                                                                       The complainant requests that the                     210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to
                                              Notice of Receipt of Complaint;                                                                                the docket number (‘‘Docket No. 3078’’)
                                                                                                       Commission issue a limited exclusion
                                              Solicitation of Comments Relating to                                                                           in a prominent place on the cover page
                                                                                                       order and cease and desist orders.
                                              the Public Interest                                         Proposed respondents, other                        and/or the first page. (See Handbook for
                                              AGENCY: U.S. International Trade                         interested parties, and members of the                Electronic Filing Procedures, Electronic
                                              Commission.                                              public are invited to file comments, not              Filing Procedures 4). Persons with
                                              ACTION: Notice.                                          to exceed five (5) pages in length,                   questions regarding filing should
                                                                                                       inclusive of attachments, on any public               contact the Secretary (202–205–2000).
                                              SUMMARY:   Notice is hereby given that                   interest issues raised by the complaint
                                              the U.S. International Trade                                                                                      Any person desiring to submit a
                                                                                                       or section 210.8(b) filing. Comments
                                              Commission has received a complaint                                                                            document to the Commission in
                                                                                                       should address whether issuance of the
                                              entitled Certain Windscreen Wipers and                   relief specifically requested by the                  confidence must request confidential
                                              Components Thereof, DN 3078; the                         complainant in this investigation would               treatment. All such requests should be
                                              Commission is soliciting comments on                     affect the public health and welfare in               directed to the Secretary to the
                                              any public interest issues raised by the                 the United States, competitive                        Commission and must include a full
                                              complaint or complainant’s filing under                  conditions in the United States                       statement of the reasons why the
                                              section 210.8(b) of the Commission’s                     economy, the production of like or                    Commission should grant such
                                              Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR                  directly competitive articles in the                  treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents
                                              210.8(b)).                                               United States, or United States                       for which confidential treatment by the
                                              FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa                    consumers.                                            Commission is properly sought will be
                                              R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission,                     In particular, the Commission is                   treated accordingly. All nonconfidential
                                              U.S. International Trade Commission,                     interested in comments that:                          written submissions will be available for
                                              500 E Street SW., Washington, DC                            (i) Explain how the articles                       public inspection at the Office of the
                                              20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. The                     potentially subject to the requested                  Secretary and on EDIS.5.
                                              public version of the complaint can be                   remedial orders are used in the United
                                                                                                                                                                This action is taken under the
                                              accessed on the Commission’s                             States;
                                                                                                          (ii) identify any public health, safety,           authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act
                                              Electronic Document Information
                                                                                                       or welfare concerns in the United States              of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 337),
                                              System (EDIS) at EDIS,1 and will be
                                                                                                       relating to the requested remedial                    and of sections 201.10 and 210.8(c) of
                                              available for inspection during official
                                                                                                       orders;                                               the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
                                              business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.)
                                              in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.                        (iii) identify like or directly                    Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, 210.8(c)).
                                              International Trade Commission, 500 E                    competitive articles that complainant,                  By order of the Commission.
                                              Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,                        its licensees, or third parties make in the             Issued: July 21, 2015.
                                              telephone (202) 205–2000.                                United States which could replace the
                                                                                                       subject articles if they were to be                   Lisa R. Barton,
                                                 General information concerning the
                                                                                                       excluded;                                             Secretary to the Commission.
                                              Commission may also be obtained by
                                              accessing its Internet server at United                     (iv) indicate whether complainant,                 [FR Doc. 2015–18278 Filed 7–24–15; 8:45 am]
                                              States International Trade Commission                    complainant’s licensees, and/or third                 BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                              (USITC) at USITC.2. The public record                    party suppliers have the capacity to
                                              for this investigation may be viewed on                  replace the volume of articles
                                                                                                       potentially subject to the requested                    4 Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures:

                                                1 Electronic Document Information System               exclusion order and/or a cease and                    http://www.usitc.gov/secretary/fed_reg_notices/
                                              (EDIS): http://edis.usitc.gov.                                                                                 rules/handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf.
                                                2 United States International Trade Commission           3 Electronic Document Information System              5 Electronic Document Information System

                                              (USITC): http://edis.usitc.gov.                          (EDIS): http://edis.usitc.gov.                        (EDIS): http://edis.usitc.gov.



                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:58 Jul 24, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00060   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 9990   E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM   27JYN1



Document Created: 2018-02-23 09:26:37
Document Modified: 2018-02-23 09:26:37
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice.
DatesListed below are the specific dates pertaining to this prize competition:
ContactChallenge Manager: Dr. Levi Brekke, Chief, Research and Development, Bureau of Reclamation, (303) 445-2494, [email protected]; Mr. Chuck Hennig, (303) 445-2134, [email protected]
FR Citation80 FR 44379 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR