80 FR 52941 - Airworthiness Directives; Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Airplanes
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 170 (September 2, 2015)
Federal Aviation Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 170 (September 2, 2015)
| Page Range | 52941-52946 | |
| FR Document | 2015-21465 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 170 (Wednesday, September 2, 2015)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 52941-52946] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-21465] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA-2014-0779; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-052-AD; Amendment 39-18260; AD 2015-18-02] RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule; request for comments. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Model 382, 382B, 382E, 382F, and 382G airplanes. This AD requires replacing the center wing box (CWB) and certain outer wings. This AD was prompted by an evaluation by the design approval holder (DAH) indicating that the CWB and outer wings are subject to widespread fatigue damage (WFD). We are issuing this AD to prevent fatigue cracking of the outer wings and the lower surface of the CWB, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane. DATES: This AD is effective September 17, 2015. The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of September 17, 2015. We must receive comments on this AD by October 19, 2015. ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR 11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Fax: 202-493-2251. Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M- [[Page 52942]] 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. For service information identified in this AD, contact Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company, Airworthiness Office, Dept. 6A0M, Zone 0252, Column P-58, 86 S. Cobb Drive, Marietta, GA 30063; telephone 770-494-5444; fax 770-494-5445; email [email protected]; Internet http://www.lockheedmartin.com/ams/tools/TechPubs.html. You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221. It is also available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014- 0779. Examining the AD Docket You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014- 0779; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl Gray, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ACE-117A, FAA, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 30337; phone: 404-474- 5554; fax: 404-474-5605; email: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Discussion We issued two notices of proposed rulemaking (NPRMs) to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding ADs that would apply to all Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Model 382, 382B, 382E, 382F, and 382G airplanes. The NPRMs were prompted by an evaluation by the design approval holder (DAH) indicating that certain structure is subject to widespread fatigue damage (WFD). We proposed the NPRMs to address fatigue cracking that could result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane. One NPRM (Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-218-AD, Docket No. FAA- 2014-0427), published in the Federal Register on July 1, 2014 (79 FR 37248), was prompted by the determination that the CWB is subject to WFD. This NPRM proposed to require repetitive inspections and corrective actions for damage of the lower surface of the center wing box; and replacement of the center wing box, which would terminate the repetitive inspections. The other NPRM (Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-052-AD, Docket No. FAA-2014-0779) is the subject of this AD. This NPRM, published in the Federal Register on December 1, 2014 (79 FR 71033), was prompted by the determination that the outer wings are subject to WFD. This NPRM proposed to require replacing certain outer wings with new or certain serviceable outer wings. Actions Since Previous Rulemaking We have subsequently determined that the proposed compliance time for replacing the CWB and outer wings would not adequately address the unsafe condition. The risk of undetected WFD rises rapidly for certain outer wings that have accumulated 30,000 total flight hours and for CWBs that have accumulated 50,000 total flight hours. Lockheed, commenting on the NPRMs for Directorate Identifier 2013- NM-218-AD (79 FR 37248, July 1, 2014) and Directorate Identifier 2014- NM-052-AD (79 FR 71033, December 1, 2014), also considered the proposed grace periods (24 months and 30 months, respectively) for replacing the CWBs and outer wings inappropriate in relation to the probable risk of the unsafe condition. Based on its engineering analysis, Lockheed concluded that the most prudent way to ensure fleet safety would be to ground affected Model 382 airplanes until over-threshold CWBs and outer wings are replaced. Therefore, in light of the urgency of the unsafe condition identified in this AD, we have determined that the unsafe condition associated with both NPRMs--Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-218-AD (79 FR 37248, July 1, 2014) and Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-052-AD (79 FR 71033, December 1, 2014)--necessitates the immediate adoption of this AD. We have revised both AD actions as follows: For the AD action related to Directorate Identifier 2013- NM-218-AD (79 FR 37248, July 1, 2014): We are considering issuing the final rule without the requirement to replace the CWB. For this AD: We have added a requirement to replace the CWB, with a shorter grace period (for airplanes over the 50,000-flight- hour threshold) than was provided in the NPRM for Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-218-AD (79 FR 38249, July 1, 2014). And, for the outer wing replacement, this AD provides a shorter grace period (for airplanes over the 30,000-flight-hour threshold) than was provided in the NPRM for this AD. This AD therefore requires replacement of both the CWB and outer wings. Comments on NPRM for Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-218-AD (79 FR 37248, July 1, 2014) Other commenters had expressed concern about the urgency of the unsafe condition and the compliance times for the CWB replacement proposed in the NPRM for Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-218-AD (79 FR 37248, July 1, 2014). The following presents the comments that are related to the proposed CWB replacement requirement (which has been moved to this final rule) and the FAA's response to those comments. Requests To Revise Compliance Time for CWB Replacement Lockheed requested that we remove the grace period from the NPRM (79 FR 37248, July 1, 2014) so that any airplane with a CWB that has accumulated over 50,000 total flight hours would be grounded until the CWB is replaced. Lockheed stated the level of risk rises rapidly beyond 50,000 total flight hours due to increasing probabilities of the presence of undetected WFD. Lynden Air Cargo (Lynden) suggested a sliding scale of compliance times, based on time accumulated on the CWB, instead of the proposed compliance time, with the highest-risk CWBs to be removed from service earliest. Safair questioned the two-year grace period in light of the safety concern associated with this final rule. The commenter stated that the compliance time, which appears to allow the DAH time to manufacture new wings, appears to be commercially driven. Safair added that the DAH, which has considered the unsafe condition associated with this AD to be a significant safety risk, has strongly advised operators to ground airplanes with center wings having more than 50,000 total flight hours. As explained previously under ``Actions Since Previous Rulemaking,'' we have determined that the proposed compliance time for replacing the CWB would not adequately address the unsafe condition. Therefore, we have shortened the proposed grace period for the CWB replacement, in paragraph (k)(2) of this AD, to 30 days or 50 flight [[Page 52943]] hours (whichever occurs later) for any CWB that has accumulated 50,000 or more total flight hours. Request To Revise Applicability Lynden questioned whether the FAA considered the safety risk factor for ``restricted category type certificated Model C-130A through H airplanes'' and whether those airplanes should be included in the applicability. We did consider the safety risk factor for Model C-130 airplanes. We issued restricted-category type certificates only for Model C-130A and C-130B airplanes, and these are low-usage airplanes. The wings on Model C-130A airplanes are different from those of other models. In addition, the CWBs have previously been replaced on all Model C-130A airplanes. There are no civil-registered Model C-130B airplanes in service. We have not changed this AD in this regard. However, we might consider further rulemaking for Model C-130 airplanes. Request To Allow Use of Certain Other Service Information Lynden requested that we revise the NPRM (79 FR 37248, July 1, 2014), for the CWB replacement requirement, to allow use of Lockheed Service Bulletin 382-57-90, dated November 5, 2010, which is specific to Lynden's fleet. Lynden explained that Lockheed Service Bulletin 382- 57-90, dated November 5, 2010, includes all the detailed installation procedures, whereas Lockheed Service Bulletin 382-57-94, dated December 3, 2013, is more generic and could involve additional nonrecurring engineering and possible alternative methods of compliance (AMOCs) for each specific CWB variant to accommodate production changes and individual airplane peculiarities. Lynden explained that those differences have already been addressed in Lockheed Service Bulletin 382-57-90, dated November 5, 2010. We agree with the commenter's request, for the reasons provided by the commenter. We have included the requested provision in paragraph (l) of this AD. Request To Revise Cost Estimates Safair requested that we revise the CWB replacement costs provided in the NPRM for Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-218-AD (79 FR 37248, July 1, 2014). The commenter stated that he was ``unable to achieve this level of pricing'' from Lockheed, and estimated that the replacement would take 15,000 work-hours, at $8.25 million per airplane. We do not agree to revise the per-airplane cost estimate. We have received no revised cost information from Lockheed. The cost estimates provided in this final rule are also based on costs provided by operators that have already replaced their CWBs. We have not changed this final rule regarding this issue. Statement Regarding Impact on Small Entities Safair questioned the statement in the NPRM (79 FR 37248, July 1, 2014) that the AD ``[w]ill not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.'' The commenter stated that the NPRM will have a significant impact on aid and relief efforts in the Third World where the Lockheed Model 382 is a significant contributor to food and aid distribution. This impact on the cost per flight hour will result in less aid delivered. As specified under the Regulatory Findings section, this AD does have a significant economic impact on small entities, based on the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis included in the NPRM for Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-052-AD (79 FR 71033, December 1, 2014). However, the FAA has not prepared a regulatory flexibility analysis for this AD. In accordance with Sec. 603(a) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, such analyses are required only for rules for which a notice of proposed rulemaking is required by 5 U.S.C. 553. Because of the urgency of this action, as discussed later in this preamble, we find that notice and comment procedures are not required for this rulemaking. Request To Allow Replacement With Serviceable CWB Safair requested that we revise the NPRM (79 FR 37248, July 1, 2014) to allow replacement of the CWB with a serviceable CWB that has accumulated less than 50,000 total flight hours, or that has more than 25,000 flight hours of usage remaining. The commenter noted that operators have acquired pre-owned center wings in anticipation of this NPRM. We partially agree with the request. The service information for the CWB replacement (Lockheed Service Bulletins 382-57-94, dated December 3, 2013; and 382-57-90, dated November 5, 2010); provides procedures for installing only a CWB that is new. Replacement with anything other than a new CWB would therefore require using a method specific to each airplane and approved by the FAA. Paragraph (j)(1) of this AD specifies replacement with a new CWB using the specified service information, and paragraph (j)(2) of this AD specifies replacement with a serviceable CWB using a method approved by the FAA. Request To Provide Credit for Previous CWB Replacement Safair requested that CWBs replaced before the release of Lockheed Service Bulletin 382-57-94, dated December 3, 2013, be excluded from the CWB replacement requirement. Safair stated that Lockheed has replaced CWBs on civil airplanes using alternative processes since the 1970s--before the release of Lockheed Service Bulletin 382-57-94, dated December 3, 2013. Safair explained that the industry supporting the military fleet of Model C-130 airplanes has significant experience and exposure to center wing replacements via other means, and should be credited for the experience and ability to develop sound processes. We disagree with the request to exclude those airplanes with previously replaced CWBs. Any replacement CWB that reaches 50,000 total flight hours before the airplane reaches its limit of validity (LOV) of 75,000 total flight hours would need to be replaced again. As explained previously, paragraph (j)(2) of this AD allows replacement of the CWB with a serviceable CWB using a method approved by the FAA. This AD is based on the life of the CWB. If it can be shown that the CWB on the airplane has accumulated less than 50,000 total flight hours, then there is no need to replace the CWB until that wing reaches 50,000 total flight hours. We have not changed this final rule regarding this issue. Additional Change to NPRM for Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-052-AD (79 FR 71033, December 1, 2014) Paragraph (i) of the NPRM (79 FR 71033, December 1, 2014) provided certain instructions for wings with previous military usage. We have revised this wording in this AD to clarify the instructions for contacting the FAA. Other Relevant Rulemaking The information in this section is restated (with minor editorial changes) from the NPRM for Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-218-AD (79 FR 37248, July 1, 2014) regarding the requirement to replace the CWBs. Replacement of the CWBs, as required by this AD, affects the requirements of certain other ADs: AD 2011-09-04, Amendment 39-16666 (76 FR 28626, May 18, 2011), requires repetitive inspections for any damage to the lower surface of the CWB, [[Page 52944]] and corrective actions if necessary. AD 2011-09-04 was issued to detect and correct fatigue cracks of the lower surface of the CWB, which could result in the structural failure of the wings. AD 2011-15-02, Amendment 39-16749 (76 FR 41647, July 15, 2011), superseded AD 2008-20-01, Amendment 39-15680 (73 FR 56464, September 29, 2008). AD 2011-15-02 requires revising the maintenance program by incorporating new airworthiness limitations for fuel tank systems to satisfy the requirements of Special Federal Aviation Regulation (SFAR) No. 88 (``SFAR 88,'' Amendment 21-78, and subsequent Amendments 21-82 (67 FR 57490, September 10, 2002) and 21-83 (67 FR 72830, December 9, 2002)), which is part of a regulation titled ``Transport Airplane Fuel Tank System Design Review, Flammability Reduction, and Maintenance and Inspection Requirements'' (66 FR 23086, May 7, 2001). AD 2011-15-02 also continues to require accomplishing certain fuel system modifications, initial inspections of certain repetitive fuel system limitations to phase in those inspections, and repair if necessary. AD 2011-15-02 corrects certain part number references, adds an additional inspection area and, for certain airplanes, requires certain actions to be reaccomplished according to revised service information. AD 2011-15-02 was issued to prevent the potential for ignition sources inside fuel tanks caused by latent failures, alterations, repairs, or maintenance actions, which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result in a fuel tank explosion and consequent loss of the airplane. AD 2012-06-09, Amendment 39-16990 (77 FR 21404, April 10, 2012), requires revising the maintenance/inspection program to include inspections that will give no less than the required damage tolerance analysis for each principal structural element (PSE), doing repetitive inspections to detect cracks of all PSEs, and repairing cracked structure. We issued AD 2012-06-09 to maintain the continued structural integrity of the fleet. AD 2015-05-08, Amendment 39-18118 (80 FR 14805, March 20, 2015), requires repetitive inspections of the upper and lower rainbow fittings on the outer wing to detect cracks propagating from fasteners attaching the fittings to skin panels, and related investigative and corrective actions if necessary; and replacement of the upper and lower rainbow fittings on the outer wing. We issued AD 2015-05-08 to prevent fatigue cracking of the upper and lower rainbow fittings on the outer wing and skin-panel-to-fitting fastener holes, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane and possible separation of the wing from the airplane. AD 2015-06-08, Amendment 39-18126 (80 FR 19013, April 9, 2015), requires repetitive eddy current inspections to detect cracks in the center wing upper and lower rainbow fittings, and corrective actions if necessary; and repetitive replacements of rainbow fittings, which would extend the repetitive interval for the next inspection. We issued this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracks, which could grow large and lead to the failure of the fitting and a catastrophic failure of the center wing. FAA's Determination We are issuing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant information and determined that the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design. AD Requirements This AD requires replacing the CWB and certain outer wings. FAA's Justification and Determination of the Effective Date An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of this AD. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public justifies waiving notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule because fatigue cracking of the outer wing and the lower surface of the CWB could result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane. Therefore, we find that notice and opportunity for prior public comment are impracticable and that good cause exists for making this amendment effective in less than 30 days. Explanation of Compliance Time The compliance times for the replacements required by this AD for addressing WFD were established to ensure that discrepant structure is replaced before WFD develops in airplanes. Standard inspection techniques cannot be relied on to detect WFD before it becomes a hazard to flight. We will not grant any extensions of the compliance time to complete any AD-mandated service bulletin related to WFD without extensive new data that would substantiate and clearly warrant such an extension. Comments Invited This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight safety and was not preceded by notice and an opportunity for public comment. However, we invite you to send any written data, views, or arguments about this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include the docket number FAA-2014-0779 and Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-052-AD at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this AD because of those comments. We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we receive about this AD. Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51 We reviewed the following service information. Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Service Bulletin 382- 57-90, dated November 5, 2010, which describes procedures for replacing the CWB with a new CWB. Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Service Bulletin 382- 57-94, dated December 3, 2013, which also describes procedures for replacing the CWB with a new CWB. Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Service Bulletin 382- 57-96, dated December 16, 2013, which describes procedures for replacing certain outer wings with new or certain serviceable outer wings. This service information is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section of this AD. Costs of Compliance We estimate that this AD affects 20 airplanes of U.S. registry. We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD: [[Page 52945]] Estimated Costs ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cost per Cost on U.S. Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CWB replacement.................... 4,800 work-hours x $85 per $5,000,000 $5,408,000 $108,160,000 hour = $408,000. Outer wing replacement............. 1,500 work-hours x 85 per 8,000,000 8,127,500 162,550,000 hour = 127,500. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Authority for This Rulemaking Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority. We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. Regulatory Findings This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and (4) Will have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. Adoption of the Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows: PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 0 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. Sec. 39.13 [Amended] 0 2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD): 2015-18-02 Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company: Amendment 39-18260; Docket No. FAA-2014-0779; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-052-AD. (a) Effective Date This AD is effective September 17, 2015. (b) Affected ADs None. (c) Applicability This AD applies to all Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Model 382, 382B, 382E, 382F, and 382G airplanes, certificated in any category. (d) Subject Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57, Wings. (e) Unsafe Condition This AD was prompted by an evaluation by the design approval holder (DAH) indicating that the outer wings and center wing box (CWB) are subject to widespread fatigue damage (WFD). We are issuing this AD to prevent fatigue cracking of the outer wings and the lower surface of the CWB, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane. (f) Compliance Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done. (g) Outer Wing Replacement For airplanes with outer wings having serial numbers (S/Ns) 3946 through 4541 inclusive, or manufacturing end product (MEP) replacement outer wings 14Y series having part numbers (P/Ns) 388021-9/-10: At the later of the times specified in paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD, except as specified in paragraph (i) of this AD, replace each outer wing with a replacement wing specified in paragraph (h) of this AD, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Lockheed Service Bulletin 382-57-96, dated December 16, 2013. (1) Before the outer wing accumulates 30,000 total flight hours. (2) Within 30 days or 50 flight hours after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later. (h) Acceptable Replacement Outer Wings (1) Outer wings having S/Ns 3946 through 4541 inclusive, and MEP replacement outer wings 14Y series having P/Ns 388021-9/-10, are acceptable for the outer wing replacement required by paragraph (g) of this AD, provided that the replacement outer wing has accumulated less than 30,000 total flight hours. The replacement outer wing must be replaced before it accumulates 30,000 total flight hours, as required by paragraph (g) of this AD. Lockheed Service Bulletin 382- 57-96, dated December 16, 2013, describes an option to salvage certain system components when replacing an outer wing. If salvaged components are used in a replacement wing, an operator may need to comply with the following: (i) AD 2011-09-04, Amendment 39-16666 (76 FR 28626, May 18, 2011); (ii) AD 2011-15-02, Amendment 39-16749 (76 FR 41647, July 15, 2011); (iii) AD 2012-06-09, Amendment 39-16990 (77 FR 21404, April 10, 2012); (iv) AD 2015-05-08, Amendment 39-18118 (80 FR 14805, March 20, 2015); and (v) AD 2015-06-08, Amendment 39-18126 (80 FR 19013, April 9, 2015). (2) Outer wings having S/Ns 4542 and subsequent, and MEP replacement outer wings except for 14Y series having P/Ns 388021-9/- 10, that have accumulated less than 75,000 total flight hours, are acceptable for the outer wing replacement required by paragraph (g) of this AD. (i) Wings With Previous Military Usage For airplanes that have any outer wing with previous military usage: Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD, contact the Manager, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, to determine a compliance time for accomplishing the actions required by paragraph (g) of this AD, by using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (n) of this AD. (j) CWB Replacement At the applicable time specified in paragraphs (k)(1) and (k)(2) of this AD: Replace the CWB, as specified in paragraph (j)(1) or (j)(2) of this AD. (1) Replace the CWB with a new CWB, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Lockheed Service Bulletin 382-57-94, dated December 3, 2013. Although a note in the Accomplishment Instructions of Lockheed Service Bulletin 382-57-94, dated December 3, 2013, instructs operators to contact Lockheed if any assistance is needed in accomplishing the actions specified in the service information, any deviation from the instructions provided [[Page 52946]] in the service information must be approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (n) of this AD. (2) Replace the CWB with a serviceable CWB using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (n) of this AD. (k) Compliance Time for CWB Replacement Replace the CWB at the later of the times specified in paragraphs (k)(1) and (k)(2) of this AD. (1) Before the CWB accumulates 50,000 total flight hours. (2) Within 30 days or 50 flight hours after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later. (l) Alternative Service Information for CWB Replacement For airplanes identified in Lockheed Service Bulletin 382-57-90, dated November 5, 2010: Replacement of the CWB with a new CWB, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Lockheed Service Bulletin 382-57-90, dated November 5, 2010, is acceptable for compliance with the requirements of paragraph (j) of this AD. (m) Terminating Action for AD 2011-09-04, Amendment 39-16666 (76 FR 28626, May 18, 2011) Replacement of the CWB as required by paragraph (j) of this AD terminates the inspections required by AD 2011-09-04, Amendment 39- 16666 (76 FR 28626, May 18, 2011), for that CWB. (n) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) (1) The Manager, Atlanta ACO, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (o) of this AD. (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding district office. (3) As of the effective date of this AD, an AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used for any repair required by this AD, if it is approved by a Delegated Engineering Representative (DER) for the Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company who has been authorized by the Manager, Atlanta ACO, to make those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair approval must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this AD. (o) Related Information For more information about this AD, contact Carl Gray, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ACE-117A, Atlanta ACO, FAA, 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 30337; phone: 404-474-5554; fax: 404-474- 5605; email: [email protected]. (p) Material Incorporated by Reference (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. (i) Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Service Bulletin 382-57- 90, dated November 5, 2010. (ii) Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Service Bulletin 382- 57-94, dated December 3, 2013. (iii) Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Service Bulletin 382- 57-96, dated December 16, 2013. (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company, Airworthiness Office, Dept. 6A0M, Zone 0252, Column P-58, 86 S. Cobb Drive, Marietta, GA 30063; telephone 770-494-5444; fax 770-494-5445; email [email protected]; Internet http://www.lockheedmartin.com/ams/tools/TechPubs.html. (4) You may view this service information at FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221. (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html. Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 21, 2015. Kevin Hull, Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2015-21465 Filed 9-1-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 170 / Wednesday, September 2, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 52941
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS assembly number 8, having part number Issued in Renton, Washington, on August
DIRECTIVES 145Z0201–12–8, 145Z0201–22–4, 145Z0201– 21, 2015.
22–3, 145Z0201–22–5, 145Z0201–22–8, Kevin Hull,
■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 145Z0201–22–9, 145Z0201–32–1, or Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
continues to read as follows: 145Z0201–34-1. Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. (i) Alternative Methods of Compliance [FR Doc. 2015–21474 Filed 9–1–15; 8:45 am]
(AMOCs) BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
§ 39.13 [Amended]
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
the following new airworthiness authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
directive (AD): requested using the procedures found in 14
Federal Aviation Administration
2015–17–24 The Boeing Company: CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
Amendment 39–18257 ; Docket No. send your request to your principal inspector
FAA–2014–0777; Directorate Identifier 14 CFR Part 39
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
2014–NM–088–AD. appropriate. If sending information directly [Docket No. FAA–2014–0779; Directorate
(a) Effective Date to the manager of the ACO, send it to the Identifier 2014–NM–052–AD; Amendment
attention of the person identified in 39–18260; AD 2015–18–02]
This AD is effective October 7, 2015.
paragraph (j) of this AD. Information may be RIN 2120–AA64
(b) Affected ADs emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-
None. Requests@faa.gov. Airworthiness Directives; Lockheed
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin
(c) Applicability
notify your appropriate principal inspector, Aeronautics Company Airplanes
This AD applies to The Boeing Company or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
Model 787–8 airplanes, certificated in any AGENCY: Federal Aviation
of the local flight standards district office/
category, as identified in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin B787–81205–SB270021–00, certificate holding district office. Administration (FAA), DOT.
Issue 001, dated March 20, 2014. (j) Related Information ACTION: Final rule; request for
(d) Subject
comments.
For more information about this AD,
Air Transport Association (ATA) of contact Douglas Tsuji, Senior Aerospace SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
America Code 27, Flight Controls. Engineer, Systems and Equipment Branch, airworthiness directive (AD) for all
ANM–130S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed
(e) Unsafe Condition
Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Martin Aeronautics Company Model
This AD was prompted by numerous Renton, WA 98057–3356; telephone: 425–
reports of failures of the proximity sensor 382, 382B, 382E, 382F, and 382G
917–6546; fax: 425–917–6590; email: airplanes. This AD requires replacing
within the slat skew detection mechanism
assembly (DMA) leading to slats up landing douglas.tsuji@faa.gov. the center wing box (CWB) and certain
events. We are issuing this AD to prevent (k) Material Incorporated by Reference outer wings. This AD was prompted by
failure of the proximity sensor, which could an evaluation by the design approval
result in the slats being shut down and a slats (1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference holder (DAH) indicating that the CWB
up high speed landing. This condition, in
combination with abnormal landing (IBR) of the service information listed in this and outer wings are subject to
conditions such as a short runway or adverse paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR widespread fatigue damage (WFD). We
weather conditions, could result in a runway part 51. are issuing this AD to prevent fatigue
excursion. (2) You must use this service information cracking of the outer wings and the
(f) Compliance as applicable to do the actions required by lower surface of the CWB, which could
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. result in reduced structural integrity of
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already (i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787– the airplane.
done. 81205–SB270021–00, Issue 001, dated March DATES: This AD is effective September
20, 2014. 17, 2015.
(g) Replacement (ii) Reserved. The Director of the Federal Register
Within 24 months after the effective date (3) For Boeing service information approved the incorporation by reference
of this AD: Replace the slat skew DMAs in identified in this AD, contact Boeing of certain publications listed in this AD
slat number 5 and slat number 8 with new Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data &
slat skew DMAs, and mark the existing as of September 17, 2015.
Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC We must receive comments on this
identification plates on the slat with the new
2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone AD by October 19, 2015.
part number, in accordance with the
206–544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
Service Bulletin B787–81205–SB270021–00, 5680; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com. using the procedures found in 14 CFR
Issue 001, dated March 20, 2014. 11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
(4) You may view this referenced service
(h) Parts Installation Prohibitions information at the FAA, Transport Airplane methods:
(1) As of the effective date of this AD, no Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
person may install a slat skew DMA, part WA. For information on the availability of http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
number P683A0001–03, on any airplane. this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. instructions for submitting comments.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
(2) As of the effective date of this AD, no (5) You may view this service information • Fax: 202–493–2251.
person may install on any airplane, a slat
that is incorporated by reference at the • Mail: U.S. Department of
assembly number 5, having part number Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
National Archives and Records
145Z0201–11–8, 145Z0201–21–4, 145Z0201–
21–3, 145Z0201–21–5, 145Z0201–21–8, Administration (NARA). For information on 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
145Z0201–21–9, 145Z0201–31-1, or the availability of this material at NARA, call W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
145Z0201–33-1. 202–741–6030, or go to: http:// Washington, DC 20590.
(3) As of the effective date of this AD, no www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr- • Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
person may install on any airplane, a slat locations.html. Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:00 Sep 01, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\02SER1.SGM 02SER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_53111/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 170 / Wednesday, September 2, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 52943
hours (whichever occurs later) for any We do not agree to revise the per- new CWB using the specified service
CWB that has accumulated 50,000 or airplane cost estimate. We have received information, and paragraph (j)(2) of this
more total flight hours. no revised cost information from AD specifies replacement with a
Lockheed. The cost estimates provided serviceable CWB using a method
Request To Revise Applicability
in this final rule are also based on costs approved by the FAA.
Lynden questioned whether the FAA provided by operators that have already
Request To Provide Credit for Previous
considered the safety risk factor for replaced their CWBs. We have not
CWB Replacement
‘‘restricted category type certificated changed this final rule regarding this
Model C–130A through H airplanes’’ issue. Safair requested that CWBs replaced
and whether those airplanes should be before the release of Lockheed Service
Statement Regarding Impact on Small Bulletin 382–57–94, dated December 3,
included in the applicability. Entities
We did consider the safety risk factor 2013, be excluded from the CWB
for Model C–130 airplanes. We issued Safair questioned the statement in the replacement requirement. Safair stated
restricted-category type certificates only NPRM (79 FR 37248, July 1, 2014) that that Lockheed has replaced CWBs on
for Model C–130A and C–130B the AD ‘‘[w]ill not have a significant civil airplanes using alternative
airplanes, and these are low-usage economic impact, positive or negative, processes since the 1970s—before the
airplanes. The wings on Model C–130A on a substantial number of small entities release of Lockheed Service Bulletin
airplanes are different from those of under the criteria of the Regulatory 382–57–94, dated December 3, 2013.
Flexibility Act.’’ The commenter stated Safair explained that the industry
other models. In addition, the CWBs
that the NPRM will have a significant supporting the military fleet of Model
have previously been replaced on all
impact on aid and relief efforts in the C–130 airplanes has significant
Model C–130A airplanes. There are no
Third World where the Lockheed Model experience and exposure to center wing
civil-registered Model C–130B airplanes
382 is a significant contributor to food replacements via other means, and
in service. We have not changed this AD
and aid distribution. This impact on the should be credited for the experience
in this regard. However, we might
cost per flight hour will result in less and ability to develop sound processes.
consider further rulemaking for Model
aid delivered. We disagree with the request to
C–130 airplanes. As specified under the Regulatory exclude those airplanes with previously
Request To Allow Use of Certain Other Findings section, this AD does have a replaced CWBs. Any replacement CWB
Service Information significant economic impact on small that reaches 50,000 total flight hours
entities, based on the Initial Regulatory before the airplane reaches its limit of
Lynden requested that we revise the Flexibility Analysis included in the
NPRM (79 FR 37248, July 1, 2014), for validity (LOV) of 75,000 total flight
NPRM for Directorate Identifier 2014– hours would need to be replaced again.
the CWB replacement requirement, to NM–052–AD (79 FR 71033, December 1,
allow use of Lockheed Service Bulletin As explained previously, paragraph
2014). However, the FAA has not (j)(2) of this AD allows replacement of
382–57–90, dated November 5, 2010, prepared a regulatory flexibility analysis
which is specific to Lynden’s fleet. the CWB with a serviceable CWB using
for this AD. In accordance with § 603(a) a method approved by the FAA. This
Lynden explained that Lockheed of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, such
Service Bulletin 382–57–90, dated AD is based on the life of the CWB. If
analyses are required only for rules for it can be shown that the CWB on the
November 5, 2010, includes all the which a notice of proposed rulemaking
detailed installation procedures, airplane has accumulated less than
is required by 5 U.S.C. 553. Because of 50,000 total flight hours, then there is
whereas Lockheed Service Bulletin 382– the urgency of this action, as discussed
57–94, dated December 3, 2013, is more no need to replace the CWB until that
later in this preamble, we find that wing reaches 50,000 total flight hours.
generic and could involve additional notice and comment procedures are not
nonrecurring engineering and possible We have not changed this final rule
required for this rulemaking. regarding this issue.
alternative methods of compliance
(AMOCs) for each specific CWB variant Request To Allow Replacement With Additional Change to NPRM for
to accommodate production changes Serviceable CWB Directorate Identifier 2014–NM–052–
and individual airplane peculiarities. Safair requested that we revise the AD (79 FR 71033, December 1, 2014)
Lynden explained that those differences NPRM (79 FR 37248, July 1, 2014) to Paragraph (i) of the NPRM (79 FR
have already been addressed in allow replacement of the CWB with a 71033, December 1, 2014) provided
Lockheed Service Bulletin 382–57–90, serviceable CWB that has accumulated certain instructions for wings with
dated November 5, 2010. less than 50,000 total flight hours, or previous military usage. We have
We agree with the commenter’s that has more than 25,000 flight hours revised this wording in this AD to
request, for the reasons provided by the of usage remaining. The commenter clarify the instructions for contacting
commenter. We have included the noted that operators have acquired pre- the FAA.
requested provision in paragraph (l) of owned center wings in anticipation of
this AD. this NPRM. Other Relevant Rulemaking
We partially agree with the request. The information in this section is
Request To Revise Cost Estimates
The service information for the CWB restated (with minor editorial changes)
Safair requested that we revise the replacement (Lockheed Service from the NPRM for Directorate Identifier
CWB replacement costs provided in the Bulletins 382–57–94, dated December 3, 2013–NM–218–AD (79 FR 37248, July 1,
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
NPRM for Directorate Identifier 2013– 2013; and 382–57–90, dated November 2014) regarding the requirement to
NM–218–AD (79 FR 37248, July 1, 5, 2010); provides procedures for replace the CWBs. Replacement of the
2014). The commenter stated that he installing only a CWB that is new. CWBs, as required by this AD, affects
was ‘‘unable to achieve this level of Replacement with anything other than a the requirements of certain other ADs:
pricing’’ from Lockheed, and estimated new CWB would therefore require using • AD 2011–09–04, Amendment 39–
that the replacement would take 15,000 a method specific to each airplane and 16666 (76 FR 28626, May 18, 2011),
work-hours, at $8.25 million per approved by the FAA. Paragraph (j)(1) of requires repetitive inspections for any
airplane. this AD specifies replacement with a damage to the lower surface of the CWB,
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:00 Sep 01, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\02SER1.SGM 02SER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_53111/page/3.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 170 / Wednesday, September 2, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 52945
ESTIMATED COSTS
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators
CWB replacement ................... 4,800 work-hours × $85 per hour = $408,000 ....................... $5,000,000 $5,408,000 $108,160,000
Outer wing replacement ......... 1,500 work-hours × 85 per hour = 127,500 ........................... 8,000,000 8,127,500 162,550,000
Authority for This Rulemaking PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS (2) Within 30 days or 50 flight hours after
DIRECTIVES the effective date of this AD, whichever
Title 49 of the United States Code occurs later.
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, ■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 (h) Acceptable Replacement Outer Wings
section 106, describes the authority of continues to read as follows: (1) Outer wings having S/Ns 3946 through
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 4541 inclusive, and MEP replacement outer
Aviation Programs’’ describes in more wings 14Y series having P/Ns 388021–9/–10,
§ 39.13 [Amended] are acceptable for the outer wing replacement
detail the scope of the Agency’s
■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding required by paragraph (g) of this AD,
authority. provided that the replacement outer wing has
We are issuing this rulemaking under the following new airworthiness accumulated less than 30,000 total flight
the authority described in Subtitle VII, directive (AD): hours. The replacement outer wing must be
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 2015–18–02 Lockheed Martin Corporation/ replaced before it accumulates 30,000 total
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company: flight hours, as required by paragraph (g) of
section, Congress charges the FAA with Amendment 39–18260; Docket No. this AD. Lockheed Service Bulletin 382–57–
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in FAA–2014–0779; Directorate Identifier 96, dated December 16, 2013, describes an
air commerce by prescribing regulations 2014–NM–052–AD. option to salvage certain system components
when replacing an outer wing. If salvaged
for practices, methods, and procedures (a) Effective Date components are used in a replacement wing,
the Administrator finds necessary for This AD is effective September 17, 2015. an operator may need to comply with the
safety in air commerce. This regulation following:
is within the scope of that authority (b) Affected ADs (i) AD 2011–09–04, Amendment 39–16666
because it addresses an unsafe condition None. (76 FR 28626, May 18, 2011);
that is likely to exist or develop on (ii) AD 2011–15–02, Amendment 39–16749
(c) Applicability (76 FR 41647, July 15, 2011);
products identified in this rulemaking
action. This AD applies to all Lockheed Martin (iii) AD 2012–06–09, Amendment 39–
Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics 16990 (77 FR 21404, April 10, 2012);
Regulatory Findings Company Model 382, 382B, 382E, 382F, and (iv) AD 2015–05–08, Amendment 39–
382G airplanes, certificated in any category. 18118 (80 FR 14805, March 20, 2015); and
This AD will not have federalism (v) AD 2015–06–08, Amendment 39–18126
implications under Executive Order (d) Subject
(80 FR 19013, April 9, 2015).
13132. This AD will not have a Air Transport Association (ATA) of (2) Outer wings having S/Ns 4542 and
substantial direct effect on the States, on America Code 57, Wings. subsequent, and MEP replacement outer
the relationship between the national (e) Unsafe Condition
wings except for 14Y series having P/Ns
government and the States, or on the 388021–9/–10, that have accumulated less
This AD was prompted by an evaluation by than 75,000 total flight hours, are acceptable
distribution of power and
the design approval holder (DAH) indicating for the outer wing replacement required by
responsibilities among the various that the outer wings and center wing box paragraph (g) of this AD.
levels of government. (CWB) are subject to widespread fatigue
For the reasons discussed above, I damage (WFD). We are issuing this AD to (i) Wings With Previous Military Usage
certify that this AD: prevent fatigue cracking of the outer wings For airplanes that have any outer wing
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory and the lower surface of the CWB, which with previous military usage: Within 30 days
action’’ under Executive Order 12866, could result in reduced structural integrity of after the effective date of this AD, contact the
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the airplane. Manager, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (ACO), FAA, to determine a compliance time
(f) Compliance for accomplishing the actions required by
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation Comply with this AD within the paragraph (g) of this AD, by using a method
compliance times specified, unless already approved in accordance with the procedures
in Alaska, and done. specified in paragraph (n) of this AD.
(4) Will have a significant economic
impact, positive or negative, on a (g) Outer Wing Replacement (j) CWB Replacement
substantial number of small entities For airplanes with outer wings having At the applicable time specified in
under the criteria of the Regulatory serial numbers (S/Ns) 3946 through 4541 paragraphs (k)(1) and (k)(2) of this AD:
Flexibility Act. inclusive, or manufacturing end product Replace the CWB, as specified in paragraph
(MEP) replacement outer wings 14Y series (j)(1) or (j)(2) of this AD.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 having part numbers (P/Ns) 388021–9/–10: (1) Replace the CWB with a new CWB, in
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation At the later of the times specified in accordance with the Accomplishment
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
safety, Incorporation by reference, paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD, except Instructions of Lockheed Service Bulletin
as specified in paragraph (i) of this AD, 382–57–94, dated December 3, 2013.
Safety. replace each outer wing with a replacement Although a note in the Accomplishment
Adoption of the Amendment wing specified in paragraph (h) of this AD, Instructions of Lockheed Service Bulletin
in accordance with the Accomplishment 382–57–94, dated December 3, 2013,
Accordingly, under the authority Instructions of Lockheed Service Bulletin instructs operators to contact Lockheed if any
delegated to me by the Administrator, 382–57–96, dated December 16, 2013. assistance is needed in accomplishing the
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as (1) Before the outer wing accumulates actions specified in the service information,
follows: 30,000 total flight hours. any deviation from the instructions provided
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:00 Sep 01, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\02SER1.SGM 02SER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_53111/page/5.svg)
![52946 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 170 / Wednesday, September 2, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
in the service information must be approved (p) Material Incorporated by Reference continuing airworthiness information
in accordance with the procedures specified (1) The Director of the Federal Register (MCAI) issued by the aviation authority
in paragraph (n) of this AD. approved the incorporation by reference of another country to identify and
(2) Replace the CWB with a serviceable (IBR) of the service information listed in this correct an unsafe condition on an
CWB using a method approved in accordance paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR aviation product. The MCAI describes
with the procedures specified in paragraph part 51.
(n) of this AD.
the unsafe condition as a discrepancy in
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
the climb performance reported in the
(k) Compliance Time for CWB Replacement airplane flight manual and in the actual
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
Replace the CWB at the later of the times (i) Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company performance of the airplane. We are
specified in paragraphs (k)(1) and (k)(2) of Service Bulletin 382–57–90, dated November issuing this AD to require actions to
this AD. 5, 2010. address the unsafe condition on these
(1) Before the CWB accumulates 50,000 (ii) Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company products.
total flight hours. Service Bulletin 382–57–94, dated December
(2) Within 30 days or 50 flight hours after 3, 2013. DATES: This AD is effective September
the effective date of this AD, whichever (iii) Lockheed Martin Aeronautics 22, 2015.
occurs later. Company Service Bulletin 382–57–96, dated The Director of the Federal Register
December 16, 2013. approved the incorporation by reference
(l) Alternative Service Information for CWB (3) For service information identified in of certain publications listed in the AD
Replacement this AD, contact Lockheed Martin as of September 22, 2015.
For airplanes identified in Lockheed Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics We must receive comments on this
Service Bulletin 382–57–90, dated November Company, Airworthiness Office, Dept. 6A0M,
AD by October 19, 2015.
5, 2010: Replacement of the CWB with a new Zone 0252, Column P–58, 86 S. Cobb Drive,
CWB, in accordance with the Marietta, GA 30063; telephone 770–494– ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
Accomplishment Instructions of Lockheed 5444; fax 770–494–5445; email ams.portal@ any of the following methods:
Service Bulletin 382–57–90, dated November lmco.com; Internet http:// • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
5, 2010, is acceptable for compliance with www.lockheedmartin.com/ams/tools/ http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
the requirements of paragraph (j) of this AD. TechPubs.html. instructions for submitting comments.
(4) You may view this service information • Fax: (202) 493–2251.
(m) Terminating Action for AD 2011–09–04, at FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Amendment 39–16666 (76 FR 28626, May
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
18, 2011) information on the availability of this Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
Replacement of the CWB as required by
(5) You may view this service information W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
paragraph (j) of this AD terminates the
inspections required by AD 2011–09–04, that is incorporated by reference at the Washington, DC 20590.
Amendment 39–16666 (76 FR 28626, May 18, National Archives and Records • Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
2011), for that CWB. Administration (NARA). For information on Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
the availability of this material at NARA, call 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
(n) Alternative Methods of Compliance 202–741–6030, or go to http:// W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
(AMOCs) www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr- Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
(1) The Manager, Atlanta ACO, FAA, has locations.html.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, except Federal holidays.
if requested using the procedures found in 14 Issued in Renton, Washington, on August
21, 2015. For service information identified in
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
Kevin Hull, this AD, contact Vulcanair S.p.A., Via
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Giovanni Pascoli 80026 Casoria NA
appropriate. If sending information directly Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. Italy; telephone: +39 081 5918111; fax:
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the [FR Doc. 2015–21465 Filed 9–1–15; 8:45 am]
+39 081 5918172; Internet: http://
attention of the person identified in www.vulcanair.com/technical-support;
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
paragraph (o) of this AD. email: continued.airworthiness@
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, vulcanair.com. You may view this
notify your appropriate principal inspector, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION referenced service information at the
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901
of the local flight standards district office/ Federal Aviation Administration Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
certificate holding district office. For information on the availability of
(3) As of the effective date of this AD, an this material at the FAA, call (816) 329–
AMOC that provides an acceptable level of
14 CFR Part 39
4148. It is also available on the Internet
safety may be used for any repair required by [Docket No. FAA–2015–3656; Directorate
this AD, if it is approved by a Delegated Identifier 2015–CE–027–AD; Amendment
at http://www.regulations.gov by
Engineering Representative (DER) for the 39–18259; AD 2015–18–01] searching for Docket No. FAA–2015–
Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company who 3656.
has been authorized by the Manager, Atlanta RIN 2120–AA64
Examining the AD Docket
ACO, to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair approval Airworthiness Directives; Vulcanair You may examine the AD docket on
must meet the certification basis of the S.p.A. Airplanes the Internet at http://
airplane, and the approval must specifically AGENCY: Federal Aviation www.regulations.gov by searching for
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
refer to this AD. and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
Administration (FAA), DOT.
(o) Related Information ACTION: Final rule; request for 3656; or in person at the Docket
comments. Management Facility between 9 a.m.
For more information about this AD,
contact Carl Gray, Aerospace Engineer, and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
Airframe Branch, ACE–117A, Atlanta ACO, SUMMARY: We are adopting a new except Federal holidays. The AD docket
FAA, 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, airworthiness directive (AD) for contains this AD, the regulatory
GA 30337; phone: 404–474–5554; fax: 404– Vulcanair S.p.A. Model P.68R airplanes. evaluation, any comments received, and
474–5605; email: carl.w.gray@faa.gov. This AD results from mandatory other information. The street address for
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:00 Sep 01, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\02SER1.SGM 02SER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_53111/page/6.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-26 10:10:41
Document Modified: 2018-02-26 10:10:41
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule; request for comments. | |
| Dates | This AD is effective September 17, 2015. | |
| Contact | Carl Gray, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ACE-117A, FAA, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 30337; phone: 404-474- 5554; fax: 404-474-5605; email: [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 52941 | |
| RIN Number | 2120-AA64 | |
| CFR Associated | Air Transportation; Aircraft; Aviation Safety; Incorporation by Reference and Safety |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR