80 FR 53480 - Airworthiness Directives; Viking Air Limited Airplanes
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 172 (September 4, 2015)
Federal Aviation Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 172 (September 4, 2015)
| Page Range | 53480-53482 | |
| FR Document | 2015-21934 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 172 (Friday, September 4, 2015)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 53480-53482] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-21934] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA-2015-3073; Directorate Identifier 2015-CE-017-AD] RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Viking Air Limited Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Proposed rule; correction. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) that published in the Federal Register. That NPRM applies to Viking Air Limited Model DHC-3 airplanes. The repetitive inspection column in ``Table 1 of Paragraph (f)(3) of This AD--Inspection Schedule'' contains data that is intended to apply to all conditions. However, the way the table is displayed makes it look as if it only applies to the first condition. This document corrects it to assure that it applies to all conditions. In all other respects, the original document remains the same. DATES: The last date for submitting comments to the NPRM (80 FR 44892, July 28, 2015) remains September 11, 2015. ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Fax: (202) 493-2251. Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact Viking Air Limited Technical Support, 1959 De Havilland Way, Sidney, British Columbia, Canada, V8L 5V5; Fax: 250-656-0673; telephone: (North America) 1-800-663-8444; email: [email protected]; Internet: http://www.vikingair.com/support/service-bulletins. It is also available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-3073.You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Small [[Page 53481]] Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call (816) 329-4148. Examining the AD Docket You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015- 3073; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aziz Ahmed, Aerospace Safety Engineer, FAA, New York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1600 Steward Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone: (516) 228-7329; fax: (516) 794-5531; email: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 28, 2015, a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) (80 FR 44892) was published in the Federal Register to apply to Viking Air Limited Model DHC-3 airplanes. That NPRM proposed to require installing additional wing inspection access panels and inspecting the wings using borescope and visual methods with corrective action as necessary. As published, the repetitive inspection column in ``Table 1 of Paragraph (f)(3) of This AD--Inspection Schedule'' contains data that when displayed makes it look as if the repetitive inspections only apply to the first condition, whereas when printed shows that it applies to all conditions. To correct this, we are including the data in each condition. Although no other part of the preamble or regulatory information has been corrected, we are publishing the entire NPRM (80 FR 44892, July 28, 2015) in the Federal Register. The last date for submitting comments to the NPRM (80 FR 44892, July 28, 2015) remains September 11, 2015. PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 0 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. Sec. 39.13 [Amended] 0 2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD: Viking Air Limited: Docket No. FAA-2015-3073; Directorate Identifier 2015-CE-017-AD. (a) Comments Due Date We must receive comments by September 11, 2015. The date as originally published in the NPRM (80 FR 44892, July 28, 2015). (b) Affected ADs None. (c) Applicability This AD applies to Viking Air Limited DHC-3 airplanes, all serial numbers, certificated in any category. (d) Subject Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 57: Wings. (e) Reason This AD was prompted by mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as reports of corrugation cracking found at various wing stations and on the main spar lower cap. We are issuing this proposed AD to detect cracking and correct as necessary to address the unsafe condition on these products. (f) Actions and Compliance Unless already done, do the following actions in paragraphs (f)(1) through (f)(5) of this AD: (1) Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD, determine the accumulated air time for each wing by contacting Technical Support at Viking Air Limited. You can find contact information for Viking Air Limited in paragraph (h) of this AD. (2) Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD, determine all installed supplemental type certificates (STC) or modifications affecting the wings. Based on the accumulated air time determined from paragraph (f)(1) of this AD and before the initial inspection required in paragraph (f)(3) of this AD, install access panels as follows: (i) If the airplane is free of STCs or any other modifications affecting the wings, install additional inspection access panels following the Accomplishment Instructions Part A of Viking DHC-3 Otter Service Bulletin No. V3/0002, Revision ``C'', dated April 30, 2014. (ii) If the airplane is fitted with STC SA2009NY (which can be found on the Internet at: http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgstc.nsf/0/F7309B7D9B008C588625734F00730144?OpenDocument&Highlight=sa02009ny), incorporate additional inspection access panels following the Accomplishment Instructions of Viking Air Limited SB 3-STC (03-50)- 001, Revision ``NC'', dated April 30, 2014. Note 1 to paragraph (f)(2)(ii) of this AD: STC SA03-50 would be the Canadian equivalent of the United States STC 2A2009NY. (iii) If there are other STCs or modifications affecting the wings the operator must contact the FAA to request an FAA-approved alternative method of compliance using the procedures in paragraph (g)(1) of this AD and 14 CFR 39.19. To develop these procedures, we recommend you contact the STC holder for guidance in developing substantiating data. (3) Based on the accumulated air time on the wings determined in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, perform initial and repetitive borescope and visual inspections of both the left-hand and right- hand wing box following Part B of the Accomplishment Instructions of Viking DHC-3 Otter Service Bulletin V3/0002, Revision ``C'', dated April 30, 2014, using the inspection schedules specified in Table 1 of paragraph (f)(3) of this AD: Table 1 of Paragraph (f)(3) of This AD--Inspection Schedule ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Repetitive Effectivity Initial inspection inspection ------------------------------------------------------------------------ If Viking Air Limited SB V3/ The initial Repetitively inspect 0002, Revision ``A'', dated inspection is not not to exceed every February 22, 2013; or required since the 1,600 wing air time Viking Air Limited SB V3/ inspection was hours accumulated 0002, Revision ``B'', dated accomplished while after the last July 3, 2013; were complied complying with inspection or 2,100 with prior to the effective Revision ``A'' or flight cycles after date of this AD. ``B'' of Viking Air the last Limited SB V3/0002. inspection, whichever occurs first. If, as of the effective date Inspect within 800 Repetitively inspect of this AD, the airplane wing air time hours not to exceed every has less than 31,200 wing after the effective 1,600 wing air time air time hours. date of this AD, or hours accumulated within 6 months after the last after the effective inspection or 2,100 date of this AD, flight cycles after whichever occurs the last first. inspection, whichever occurs first. If, as of the effective date Inspect upon or Repetitively inspect of this AD, the airplane before accumulating not to exceed every has 31,200 hours wing air 32,000 wing air 1,600 wing air time time or more but less than time hours or hours accumulated 31,600 hours wing air time within 6 months after the last hours. after the effective inspection or 2,100 date of this AD, flight cycles after whichever occurs the last first. inspection, whichever occurs first. [[Page 53482]] If, as of the effective date Inspect within 400 Repetitively inspect of this AD, the airplane wing air time hours not to exceed every has 31,600 wing air time accumulated after 1,600 wing air time hours or more. the effective date hours accumulated of this AD or 3 after the last months after the inspection or 2,100 effective date of flight cycles after this AD, whichever the last occurs first. inspection, whichever occurs first. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ (4) If the total flight cycles have not been kept, multiply the total number of airplane hours time-in-service (TIS) by 2 to calculate the cycles. For the purpose of this AD, some examples are below: (i) .5 hour TIS x 2 = 1 cycle; and (ii) 200 hours TIS x 2 = 400 cycles. (5) If any cracks are found, contact Technical Support at Viking Air Limited for an FAA-approved repair and incorporate the repair before further flight. You can find contact information for Viking Air Limited in paragraph (i) of this AD. The FAA-approved repair must specifically reference this AD. (g) Other FAA AD Provisions The following provisions also apply to this AD: (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Aziz Ahmed, Aerospace Safety Engineer, FAA, New York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1600 Steward Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone: (516) 228-7329; fax: (516) 794-5531; email: [email protected]. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO. (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority (or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product is airworthy before it is returned to service. (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in this AD, a federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information displays a current valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is 2120-0056. Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to be approximately 5 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, completing and reviewing the collection of information. All responses to this collection of information are mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn: Information Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200. (h) Related Information Refer to MCAI Transport Canada AD No. CF-2015-05, dated March 18, 2015. You may examine the MCAI on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA- 2015-3073. For service information related to this AD, contact Viking Air Limited Technical Support, 1959 De Havilland Way, Sidney, British Columbia, Canada, V8L 5V5; Fax: 250-656-0673; telephone: (North America) 1-800-663-8444; email: [email protected]; Internet: http://www.vikingair.com/support/service-bulletins. You may review this referenced service information at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call (816) 329-4148. Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on August 28, 2015. Earl Lawrence, Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2015-21934 Filed 9-3-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
![53480 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 172 / Friday, September 4, 2015 / Proposed Rules
potential impacts to stakeholders/ objectives? If so, what are the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
licensees from implementing any of the consequences and how should they be
desired regulatory changes described in addressed? Federal Aviation Administration
this draft regulatory basis (e.g., what Please provide information on the
would be a reasonable cost estimate for 14 CFR Part 39
costs and benefits of the potential
implementation of the cyber security [Docket No. FAA–2015–3073; Directorate
proposed action. This information will
programs, including startup and annual Identifier 2015–CE–017–AD]
costs)? be used to support any regulatory
• The NRC staff is aware of licensee analysis by the NRC. RIN 2120–AA64
voluntary efforts to address cyber V. Availability of Documents
security. Is there additional information Airworthiness Directives; Viking Air
related to these efforts that would The NRC may post additional Limited Airplanes
inform the NRC staff’s assessment or materials related to this rulemaking AGENCY: Federal Aviation
analysis? activity to the Federal rulemaking Web Administration (FAA), DOT.
IV. Cumulative Effects of Regulation site at www.regulations.gov under ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.
Docket ID NRC–2015–0179. By making
The Cumulative Effects of Regulation SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting a
these documents publicly available, the
(CER) describes the challenges that notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
NRC seeks to inform stakeholders of the
licensees or other impacted entities that published in the Federal Register.
(such as State agency partners) may face current status of the NRC’s rulemaking
development activities and to provide That NPRM applies to Viking Air
while implementing new regulatory Limited Model DHC–3 airplanes. The
positions, programs, and requirements preparatory material for future public
meetings. repetitive inspection column in ‘‘Table
(e.g., rules, generic letters, backfits, 1 of Paragraph (f)(3) of This AD—
inspections). The CER is an The Federal rulemaking Web site Inspection Schedule’’ contains data that
organizational effectiveness challenge allows you to receive alerts when is intended to apply to all conditions.
that results from a licensee or impacted changes or additions occur in a docket However, the way the table is displayed
entity implementing a number of folder. To subscribe: (1) Navigate to the makes it look as if it only applies to the
complex positions, programs, or docket folder (NRC–2015–0179); (2) first condition. This document corrects
requirements within a limited click the ‘‘Sign up for Email Alerts’’ it to assure that it applies to all
implementation period and with link; and (3) enter your email address conditions. In all other respects, the
available resources (which may include and select how frequently you would original document remains the same.
limited available expertise to address a like to receive emails (daily, weekly, or DATES: The last date for submitting
specific issue). The NRC has monthly). comments to the NPRM (80 FR 44892,
implemented CER enhancements to the
July 28, 2015) remains September 11,
rulemaking process to facilitate public VI. Plain Writing
2015.
involvement throughout the rulemaking
process. Therefore, the NRC is The Plain Writing Act of 2010 (Pub. ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
specifically requesting comment on the L. 111–274) requires Federal agencies to any of the following methods:
cumulative effects that may result from write documents in a clear, concise, • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
this proposed rulemaking. In developing well-organized manner. The NRC has http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
comments on the draft regulatory basis, written this document to be consistent instructions for submitting comments.
consider the following questions: with the Plain Writing Act as well as the • Fax: (202) 493–2251.
(1) In light of any current or projected Presidential Memorandum, ‘‘Plain • Mail: U.S. Department of
CER challenges, what should be a Language in Government Writing,’’ Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
reasonable effective date, compliance published in the Federal Register on 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
date, or submittal date(s) from the time June 10, 1998 (63 FR 31883). The NRC W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
the final rule is published to the actual requests comment on this document Washington, DC 20590.
implementation of any new proposed with respect to the clarity and • Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
requirements, including changes to Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
effectiveness of the language used.
programs, procedures, or the facility? 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
(2) If current or projected CER Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 27th day W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
challenges exist, what should be done to of August, 2015. Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
address this situation (e.g., if more time For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
is required to implement the new Marissa G. Bailey, except Federal holidays.
requirements, what period of time Director, Division of Fuel Cycle Safety, For service information identified in
would be sufficient, and why such a Safeguards, and Environmental Review, this proposed AD, contact Viking Air
time frame is necessary)? Office of Nuclear Materials Safety and Limited Technical Support, 1959 De
(3) Do other regulatory actions (e.g., Safeguards. Havilland Way, Sidney, British
orders, generic communications, license [FR Doc. 2015–22051 Filed 9–3–15; 8:45 am] Columbia, Canada, V8L 5V5; Fax: 250–
amendment requests, and inspection BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
656–0673; telephone: (North America)
findings of a generic nature) by NRC or 1–800–663–8444; email:
rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
other agencies influence the technical.support@vikingair.com;
implementation of the potential Internet: http://www.vikingair.com/
proposed requirements? support/service-bulletins. It is also
(4) Are there unintended available on the Internet at http://
consequences? Does the potential www.regulations.gov by searching for
proposed action create conditions that and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
would be contrary to the potential 3073.You may view this referenced
proposed action’s purpose and service information at the FAA, Small
VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:58 Sep 03, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\04SEP1.SGM 04SEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_53652/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 172 / Friday, September 4, 2015 / Proposed Rules 53481
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Although no other part of the (1) Within 30 days after the effective date
Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For preamble or regulatory information has of this AD, determine the accumulated air
information on the availability of this been corrected, we are publishing the time for each wing by contacting Technical
material at the FAA, call (816) 329– entire NPRM (80 FR 44892, July 28, Support at Viking Air Limited. You can find
4148. 2015) in the Federal Register. contact information for Viking Air Limited in
The last date for submitting comments paragraph (h) of this AD.
Examining the AD Docket to the NPRM (80 FR 44892, July 28, (2) Within 30 days after the effective date
2015) remains September 11, 2015. of this AD, determine all installed
You may examine the AD docket on
supplemental type certificates (STC) or
the Internet at http:// modifications affecting the wings. Based on
www.regulations.gov by searching for PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES the accumulated air time determined from
and locating Docket No. FAA–2015– paragraph (f)(1) of this AD and before the
3073; or in person at the Docket ■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 initial inspection required in paragraph (f)(3)
Management Facility between 9 a.m. continues to read as follows: of this AD, install access panels as follows:
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, (i) If the airplane is free of STCs or any
except Federal holidays. The AD docket Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. other modifications affecting the wings,
contains this proposed AD, the § 39.13 [Amended] install additional inspection access panels
regulatory evaluation, any comments ■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding following the Accomplishment Instructions
received, and other information. The Part A of Viking DHC–3 Otter Service
the following new AD:
street address for the Docket Office Bulletin No. V3/0002, Revision ‘‘C’’, dated
(telephone (800) 647–5527) is in the Viking Air Limited: Docket No. FAA–2015– April 30, 2014.
3073; Directorate Identifier 2015–CE– (ii) If the airplane is fitted with STC
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
017–AD. SA2009NY (which can be found on the
available in the AD docket shortly after
(a) Comments Due Date Internet at: http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_
receipt.
and_Guidance_Library/rgstc.nsf/0/F7309
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aziz We must receive comments by September
11, 2015. The date as originally published in B7D9B008C588625734F00730144?Open
Ahmed, Aerospace Safety Engineer, the NPRM (80 FR 44892, July 28, 2015). Document&Highlight=sa02009ny),
FAA, New York Aircraft Certification incorporate additional inspection access
Office (ACO), 1600 Steward Avenue, (b) Affected ADs panels following the Accomplishment
Suite 410, Westbury, New York 11590; None. Instructions of Viking Air Limited SB 3–STC
telephone: (516) 228–7329; fax: (516) (03–50)-001, Revision ‘‘NC’’, dated April 30,
(c) Applicability
794–5531; email: aziz.ahmed@faa.gov. 2014.
This AD applies to Viking Air Limited Note 1 to paragraph (f)(2)(ii) of this AD:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July DHC–3 airplanes, all serial numbers, STC SA03–50 would be the Canadian
28, 2015, a notice of proposed certificated in any category. equivalent of the United States STC
rulemaking (NPRM) (80 FR 44892) was (d) Subject 2A2009NY.
published in the Federal Register to (iii) If there are other STCs or
Air Transport Association of America
apply to Viking Air Limited Model (ATA) Code 57: Wings. modifications affecting the wings the
DHC–3 airplanes. That NPRM proposed operator must contact the FAA to request an
to require installing additional wing (e) Reason FAA-approved alternative method of
inspection access panels and inspecting This AD was prompted by mandatory compliance using the procedures in
the wings using borescope and visual continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) paragraph (g)(1) of this AD and 14 CFR 39.19.
methods with corrective action as originated by an aviation authority of another To develop these procedures, we recommend
necessary. country to identify and correct an unsafe you contact the STC holder for guidance in
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI developing substantiating data.
As published, the repetitive describes the unsafe condition as reports of (3) Based on the accumulated air time on
inspection column in ‘‘Table 1 of corrugation cracking found at various wing the wings determined in paragraph (f)(1) of
Paragraph (f)(3) of This AD—Inspection stations and on the main spar lower cap. We this AD, perform initial and repetitive
Schedule’’ contains data that when are issuing this proposed AD to detect
borescope and visual inspections of both the
displayed makes it look as if the cracking and correct as necessary to address
the unsafe condition on these products. left-hand and right-hand wing box following
repetitive inspections only apply to the Part B of the Accomplishment Instructions of
first condition, whereas when printed (f) Actions and Compliance Viking DHC–3 Otter Service Bulletin V3/
shows that it applies to all conditions. Unless already done, do the following 0002, Revision ‘‘C’’, dated April 30, 2014,
To correct this, we are including the actions in paragraphs (f)(1) through (f)(5) of using the inspection schedules specified in
data in each condition. this AD: Table 1 of paragraph (f)(3) of this AD:
TABLE 1 OF PARAGRAPH (F)(3) OF THIS AD—INSPECTION SCHEDULE
Effectivity Initial inspection Repetitive inspection
If Viking Air Limited SB V3/0002, Revision ‘‘A’’, The initial inspection is not required since the Repetitively inspect not to exceed every 1,600
dated February 22, 2013; or Viking Air Lim- inspection was accomplished while com- wing air time hours accumulated after the
ited SB V3/0002, Revision ‘‘B’’, dated July 3, plying with Revision ‘‘A’’ or ‘‘B’’ of Viking Air last inspection or 2,100 flight cycles after
2013; were complied with prior to the effec- Limited SB V3/0002. the last inspection, whichever occurs first.
rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
tive date of this AD.
If, as of the effective date of this AD, the air- Inspect within 800 wing air time hours after Repetitively inspect not to exceed every 1,600
plane has less than 31,200 wing air time the effective date of this AD, or within 6 wing air time hours accumulated after the
hours. months after the effective date of this AD, last inspection or 2,100 flight cycles after
whichever occurs first. the last inspection, whichever occurs first.
If, as of the effective date of this AD, the air- Inspect upon or before accumulating 32,000 Repetitively inspect not to exceed every 1,600
plane has 31,200 hours wing air time or more wing air time hours or within 6 months after wing air time hours accumulated after the
but less than 31,600 hours wing air time the effective date of this AD, whichever oc- last inspection or 2,100 flight cycles after
hours. curs first. the last inspection, whichever occurs first.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:58 Sep 03, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\04SEP1.SGM 04SEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_53652/page/2.svg)
![53482 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 172 / Friday, September 4, 2015 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 1 OF PARAGRAPH (F)(3) OF THIS AD—INSPECTION SCHEDULE—Continued
Effectivity Initial inspection Repetitive inspection
If, as of the effective date of this AD, the air- Inspect within 400 wing air time hours accu- Repetitively inspect not to exceed every 1,600
plane has 31,600 wing air time hours or more. mulated after the effective date of this AD wing air time hours accumulated after the
or 3 months after the effective date of this last inspection or 2,100 flight cycles after
AD, whichever occurs first. the last inspection, whichever occurs first.
(4) If the total flight cycles have not been Information Collection Clearance Officer, ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a
kept, multiply the total number of airplane AES–200. comment at http://
hours time-in-service (TIS) by 2 to calculate ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/
(h) Related Information
the cycles. For the purpose of this AD, some riyocoppaconsent online or on paper, by
examples are below: Refer to MCAI Transport Canada AD No.
following the instructions in the
(i) .5 hour TIS × 2 = 1 cycle; and CF–2015–05, dated March 18, 2015. You may
(ii) 200 hours TIS × 2 = 400 cycles. examine the MCAI on the Internet at Request for Comment part of the
(5) If any cracks are found, contact http://www.regulations.gov by searching for SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
Technical Support at Viking Air Limited for and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–3073. below. Write ‘‘Jest8 Limited Trading as
an FAA-approved repair and incorporate the For service information related to this AD, Riyo’s Application for Parental Consent
repair before further flight. You can find contact Viking Air Limited Technical Method, Project No. P–155405’’ on your
contact information for Viking Air Limited in Support, 1959 De Havilland Way, Sidney, comment, and file your comment online
paragraph (i) of this AD. The FAA-approved British Columbia, Canada, V8L 5V5; Fax: at http://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/
repair must specifically reference this AD. 250–656–0673; telephone: (North America) ftc/riyocoppaconsent by following the
1–800–663–8444; email: technical.support@
(g) Other FAA AD Provisions vikingair.com; Internet: http://www.vikingair.
instructions on the Web-based form. If
The following provisions also apply to this com/support/service-bulletins. You may you prefer to file your comment on
AD: review this referenced service information at paper, write ‘‘Jest8 Limited Trading as
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Riyo’s Application for Parental Consent
(AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Office, Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For Method, Project No. P–155405’’ on your
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs information on the availability of this comment and on the envelope, and mail
for this AD, if requested using the procedures material at the FAA, call (816) 329–4148. your comment to the following address:
found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on August Federal Trade Commission, Office of the
ATTN: Aziz Ahmed, Aerospace Safety 28, 2015. Secretary, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Engineer, FAA, New York Aircraft NW, Suite CC–5610 (Annex E),
Certification Office (ACO), 1600 Steward Earl Lawrence,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Washington, DC 20580, or deliver your
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York
11590; telephone: (516) 228–7329; fax: (516) Certification Service. comment to the following address:
794–5531; email: aziz.ahmed@faa.gov. Before [FR Doc. 2015–21934 Filed 9–3–15; 8:45 am] Federal Trade Commission, Office of the
using any approved AMOC on any airplane Secretary, Constitution Center, 400 7th
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
to which the AMOC applies, notify your Street SW., 5th Floor, Suite 5610
appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the (Annex E), Washington, DC 20024.
FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION Miry Kim, Attorney, (202) 326–3622,
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement Division of Privacy and Identity
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from 16 CFR Part 312
Protection, Federal Trade Commission,
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
RIN 3084–AB20 Washington, DC 20580.
actions are considered FAA-approved if they SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
are approved by the State of Design Authority
Children’s Online Privacy Protection
Rule Proposed Parental Consent Section A. Background
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it Method; Jest8 Limited Trading as On October 20, 1999, the Commission
is returned to service. Riyo’s Application for Approval of issued its final Rule 1 pursuant to the
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any Parental Consent Method; Extension of Children’s Online Privacy Protection
reporting requirement in this AD, a federal Comment Period Act, 15 U.S.C. 6501 et seq., which
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a became effective on April 21, 2000.2 On
person is not required to respond to, nor AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission
shall a person be subject to a penalty for (FTC or Commission). December 19, 2012, the Commission
failure to comply with a collection of amended the Rule, and these
ACTION: Extension of comment period.
information subject to the requirements of amendments became effective on July 1,
the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that SUMMARY: The Federal Trade 2013.3 The Rule requires certain Web
collection of information displays a current Commission is extending the comment site operators to post privacy policies
valid OMB Control Number. The OMB
period concerning the proposed and provide notice, and to obtain
Control Number for this information verifiable parental consent, prior to
collection is 2120–0056. Public reporting for parental consent method submitted by
Jest8 Limited, trading as Riyo (‘‘Riyo’’), collecting, using, or disclosing personal
this collection of information is estimated to information from children under the age
rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
be approximately 5 minutes per response, under the Voluntary Commission
including the time for reviewing instructions, Approval Processes provision of the of 13. The Rule enumerates methods for
completing and reviewing the collection of Children’s Online Privacy Protection obtaining verifiable parental consent,
information. All responses to this collection Rule. while also allowing an interested party
of information are mandatory. Comments to file a written request for Commission
concerning the accuracy of this burden and DATES: Written comments on the request
suggestions for reducing the burden should for public comment published August 7, 1 64 FR 59888 (November 3, 1999).
be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence 2015 (80 FR 47429) must be received on 2 16 CFR part 312.
Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn: or before September 14, 2015. 3 78 FR 3972 (January 17, 2013).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:58 Sep 03, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\04SEP1.SGM 04SEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_53652/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-15 09:58:23
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 09:58:23
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule; correction. | |
| Dates | The last date for submitting comments to the NPRM (80 FR 44892, July 28, 2015) remains September 11, 2015. | |
| Contact | Aziz Ahmed, Aerospace Safety Engineer, FAA, New York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1600 Steward Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone: (516) 228-7329; fax: (516) 794-5531; email: [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 53480 | |
| RIN Number | 2120-AA64 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR