80_FR_53668 80 FR 53496 - Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014

80 FR 53496 - Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 172 (September 4, 2015)

Page Range53496-53497
FR Document2015-22066

The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on large power transformers (LPTs) from the Republic of Korea (Korea).\1\ The period of review (POR) is August 1, 2013, through July 31, 2014. The review covers five producers/exporters of the subject merchandise, Hyosung Corporation (Hyosung), Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (Hyundai), ILJIN, ILJIN Electric Co., Ltd. (ILJIN Electric), and LSIS Co., Ltd. (LSIS). We preliminarily determine that sales of subject merchandise by Hyosung and Hyundai, the two companies selected for individual examination, were made at less than normal value during the POR. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 172 (Friday, September 4, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 172 (Friday, September 4, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53496-53497]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-22066]



[[Page 53496]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-580-867]


Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an 
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on large power 
transformers (LPTs) from the Republic of Korea (Korea).\1\ The period 
of review (POR) is August 1, 2013, through July 31, 2014. The review 
covers five producers/exporters of the subject merchandise, Hyosung 
Corporation (Hyosung), Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (Hyundai), 
ILJIN, ILJIN Electric Co., Ltd. (ILJIN Electric), and LSIS Co., Ltd. 
(LSIS). We preliminarily determine that sales of subject merchandise by 
Hyosung and Hyundai, the two companies selected for individual 
examination, were made at less than normal value during the POR. 
Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews, 79 FR 58729 (September 30, 2014).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: September 4, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Davis or Edythe Artman, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
7924 or (202) 482-3931, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Scope of the Order

    The scope of this order covers large liquid dielectric power 
transformers (LPTs) having a top power handling capacity greater than 
or equal to 60,000 kilovolt amperes (60 megavolt amperes), whether 
assembled or unassembled, complete or incomplete. The merchandise 
subject to the order is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States at subheadings 8504.23.0040, 8504.23.0080 
and 8504.90.9540. This tariff classification is provided for 
convenience and Customs purposes; however, the written description of 
the scope of the order is dispositive. A full description of the scope 
of the order is contained in the memorandum from Gary Taverman, 
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for AD/CVD Operations, to Paul 
Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, titled 
``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review: Large Power Transformers from the Republic of 
Korea; 2013-2014'' (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), which is issued 
concurrent with and hereby adopted by this notice.
    The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on 
file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 
Access to ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central Records 
Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In 
addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can 
be accessed directly on the Internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum is attached as an Appendix to this notice. The signed 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content.

Methodology

    The Department has conducted this review in accordance with section 
751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Constructed 
export price (CEP) is calculated in accordance with section 772 of the 
Act. Normal value is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the 
Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our 
conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.

Preliminary Results of Review

    We preliminarily determine that, for the period August 1, 2013, 
through July 31, 2014, the following dumping margins exist: \2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ As we did not have publicly-ranged U.S. sales volumes for 
Hyosung for the period August 1, 2013, through July 31, 2014, to 
calculate a weighted-average percentage margin for the non-selected 
companies (i.e., ILJIN, ILJIN Electric, and LSIS) in this review, 
the rate applied to the non-selected companies is a simple average 
percentage margin calculated based on the margins calculated for 
Hyosung and Hyundai.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                average
                    Manufacturer/exporter                       margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hyosung Corporation.........................................       11.01
Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd...........................        3.96
ILJIN Electric Co., Ltd.....................................        7.49
ILJIN.......................................................        7.49
LSIS Co., Ltd...............................................        7.49
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure and Public Comment

    The Department will disclose to parties to the proceeding any 
calculations performed in connection with these preliminary results of 
review within five days after the date of publication of this 
notice.\3\ The Department will announce the briefing schedule to 
interested parties at a later date. Interested parties may submit case 
briefs on the deadline that the Department will announce and rebuttal 
briefs within five days after the time limit for filing case briefs.\4\ 
Rebuttal briefs, the content of which is limited to the issues raised 
in the case briefs, must be filed within five days from the deadline 
date for the submission of case briefs.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See 19 CFR 351.224.(b).
    \4\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii) and (d)(1).
    \5\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1) and (2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Parties who submit arguments in this proceeding are requested to 
submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief 
summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\6\ Case and 
rebuttal briefs should be filed using ACCESS.\7\ Case and rebuttal 
briefs must be served on interested parties.\8\ Executive summaries 
should be limited to five pages total, including footnotes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2).
    \7\ See generally 19 CFR 351.303.
    \8\ See 19 CFR 351.303(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to 
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant 
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance within 30 days of the date of 
publication of this notice. Requests should contain: (1) The party's 
name, address and telephone number; (2) The number of participants; and 
(3) A list of issues parties intend to discuss. Issues raised in the 
hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case and 
rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, the Department 
intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a date and 
time to be determined.\9\ Parties should confirm by telephone the date, 
time, and

[[Page 53497]]

location of the hearing two days before the scheduled date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department intends to publish the final results of this 
administrative review, including the results of its analysis of issues 
addressed in any case or rebuttal brief, no later than 120 days after 
publication of these preliminary results, unless extended.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act; 19 CFR 351.213(h).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    Upon completion of this administrative review, the Department shall 
determine, and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries.\11\ If respondents' 
weighted-average dumping margin is not zero or de minimis in the final 
results of this review, we will calculate importer-specific assessment 
rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of antidumping 
duties calculated for an importer's examined sales and the total 
entered value of such sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). If 
respondents' weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis in 
the final results of review, we will instruct CBP not to assess duties 
on any of its entries in accordance with the Final Modification for 
Reviews, i.e., ``{w{time} here the weighted-average margin of dumping 
for the exporter is determined to be zero or de minimis, no antidumping 
duties will be assessed.'' \12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
    \12\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 (February 14, 
2012) (Final Modification for Reviews).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We intend to issue liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days after 
publication of the final results of this review.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the 
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Hyosung and 
Hyundai will be that established in the final results of this 
administrative review; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated 
companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be 
the company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if 
the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or 
in the investigation but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate 
will be the rate established for the most recent period for the 
manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all 
other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be the all-others 
rate of 22.00 percent, which is the all-others rate established in the 
investigation.\13\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall 
remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: 
Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 53177 (August 31, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.
    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: August 31, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix I--List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum

1. Background
2. Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination
3. Deadline for Submission of Updated Sales and Cost Information
4. Verification
5. Scope of the Order
6. Comparisons to Normal Value
    A. Determination of Comparison Method
    B. Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis
7. Product Comparisons
8. Date of Sale
9. Constructed Export Price
10. Normal Value
    A. Home Market Viability as Comparison Market
    B. Level of Trade
    C. Cost of Production
1. Calculation of Cost of Production
2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices
3. Results of the Cost of Production Test
    D. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Comparison Market Prices
    E. Price-to-Constructed Value Comparison
    F. Constructed Value
11. Currency Conversion
12. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2015-22066 Filed 9-3-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P



                                                  53496                       Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 172 / Friday, September 4, 2015 / Notices

                                                  DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE                                  contained in the memorandum from                                                                           Weighted-
                                                                                                          Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy                                Manufacturer/exporter                        average
                                                  International Trade Administration                      Assistant Secretary for AD/CVD                                                                               margin
                                                                                                          Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant                                                                     (percent)
                                                  [A–580–867]
                                                                                                          Secretary for Enforcement and                          Hyundai Heavy Industries Co.,
                                                  Large Power Transformers From the                       Compliance, titled ‘‘Decision                            Ltd ...........................................        3.96
                                                  Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results                  Memorandum for Preliminary Results of                  ILJIN Electric Co., Ltd ................                 7.49
                                                  of Antidumping Duty Administrative                      Antidumping Duty Administrative                        ILJIN ...........................................        7.49
                                                  Review; 2013–2014                                       Review: Large Power Transformers from                  LSIS Co., Ltd ..............................             7.49
                                                                                                          the Republic of Korea; 2013–2014’’
                                                  AGENCY:   Enforcement and Compliance,                   (Preliminary Decision Memorandum),
                                                  International Trade Administration,                                                                            Disclosure and Public Comment
                                                                                                          which is issued concurrent with and
                                                  Department of Commerce.                                 hereby adopted by this notice.                            The Department will disclose to
                                                  SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce                        The Preliminary Decision                            parties to the proceeding any
                                                  (the Department) is conducting an                       Memorandum is a public document and                    calculations performed in connection
                                                  administrative review of the                            is on file electronically via Enforcement
                                                  antidumping duty order on large power                                                                          with these preliminary results of review
                                                                                                          and Compliance’s Antidumping and                       within five days after the date of
                                                  transformers (LPTs) from the Republic                   Countervailing Duty Centralized
                                                  of Korea (Korea).1 The period of review                                                                        publication of this notice.3 The
                                                                                                          Electronic Service System (ACCESS).                    Department will announce the briefing
                                                  (POR) is August 1, 2013, through July                   Access to ACCESS is available to
                                                  31, 2014. The review covers five                                                                               schedule to interested parties at a later
                                                                                                          registered users at http://                            date. Interested parties may submit case
                                                  producers/exporters of the subject                      access.trade.gov and is available to all
                                                  merchandise, Hyosung Corporation                                                                               briefs on the deadline that the
                                                                                                          parties in the Central Records Unit,                   Department will announce and rebuttal
                                                  (Hyosung), Hyundai Heavy Industries                     Room B8024 of the main Department of
                                                  Co., Ltd. (Hyundai), ILJIN, ILJIN Electric                                                                     briefs within five days after the time
                                                                                                          Commerce building. In addition, a                      limit for filing case briefs.4 Rebuttal
                                                  Co., Ltd. (ILJIN Electric), and LSIS Co.,               complete version of the Preliminary
                                                  Ltd. (LSIS). We preliminarily determine                                                                        briefs, the content of which is limited to
                                                                                                          Decision Memorandum can be accessed                    the issues raised in the case briefs, must
                                                  that sales of subject merchandise by                    directly on the Internet at http://
                                                  Hyosung and Hyundai, the two                                                                                   be filed within five days from the
                                                                                                          enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.                  deadline date for the submission of case
                                                  companies selected for individual                       A list of topics discussed in the
                                                  examination, were made at less than                                                                            briefs.5
                                                                                                          Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
                                                  normal value during the POR. Interested                 attached as an Appendix to this notice.                   Parties who submit arguments in this
                                                  parties are invited to comment on these                 The signed Preliminary Decision                        proceeding are requested to submit with
                                                  preliminary results.                                    Memorandum and the electronic                          each argument: (1) A statement of the
                                                  DATES: Effective Date: September 4,                     versions of the Preliminary Decision                   issue; (2) a brief summary of the
                                                  2015.                                                   Memorandum are identical in content.                   argument; and (3) a table of authorities.6
                                                  FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                                                                                                                                 Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed
                                                                                                          Methodology                                            using ACCESS.7 Case and rebuttal briefs
                                                  Brian Davis or Edythe Artman, AD/CVD
                                                  Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and                    The Department has conducted this                    must be served on interested parties.8
                                                  Compliance, International Trade                         review in accordance with section                      Executive summaries should be limited
                                                  Administration, U.S. Department of                      751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as                to five pages total, including footnotes.
                                                  Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution                  amended (the Act). Constructed export                     Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
                                                  Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;                       price (CEP) is calculated in accordance                interested parties who wish to request a
                                                  telephone: (202) 482–7924 or (202) 482–                 with section 772 of the Act. Normal                    hearing must submit a written request to
                                                  3931, respectively.                                     value is calculated in accordance with                 the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
                                                                                                          section 773 of the Act. For a full                     and Compliance within 30 days of the
                                                  SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                                                                          description of the methodology                         date of publication of this notice.
                                                  Scope of the Order                                      underlying our conclusions, see the                    Requests should contain: (1) The party’s
                                                     The scope of this order covers large                 Preliminary Decision Memorandum.                       name, address and telephone number;
                                                  liquid dielectric power transformers                    Preliminary Results of Review                          (2) The number of participants; and (3)
                                                  (LPTs) having a top power handling                        We preliminarily determine that, for                 A list of issues parties intend to discuss.
                                                  capacity greater than or equal to 60,000                the period August 1, 2013, through July                Issues raised in the hearing will be
                                                  kilovolt amperes (60 megavolt amperes),                 31, 2014, the following dumping                        limited to those raised in the respective
                                                  whether assembled or unassembled,                       margins exist: 2                                       case and rebuttal briefs. If a request for
                                                  complete or incomplete. The                                                                                    a hearing is made, the Department
                                                  merchandise subject to the order is                                                              Weighted-     intends to hold the hearing at the U.S.
                                                  currently classified in the Harmonized                                                            average      Department of Commerce, 14th Street
                                                                                                                Manufacturer/exporter
                                                  Tariff Schedule of the United States at                                                            margin      and Constitution Avenue NW.,
                                                  subheadings 8504.23.0040,                                                                        (percent)     Washington, DC 20230, at a date and
                                                  8504.23.0080 and 8504.90.9540. This                     Hyosung Corporation ..................        11.01    time to be determined.9 Parties should
                                                  tariff classification is provided for                                                                          confirm by telephone the date, time, and
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                  convenience and Customs purposes;                         2 As we did not have publicly-ranged U.S. sales
                                                  however, the written description of the                 volumes for Hyosung for the period August 1, 2013,       3 See 19 CFR 351.224.(b).
                                                  scope of the order is dispositive. A full               through July 31, 2014, to calculate a weighted-          4 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii) and (d)(1).
                                                                                                          average percentage margin for the non-selected
                                                  description of the scope of the order is                companies (i.e., ILJIN, ILJIN Electric, and LSIS) in
                                                                                                                                                                   5 See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1) and (2).
                                                                                                                                                                   6 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2).
                                                                                                          this review, the rate applied to the non-selected
                                                    1 See Initiation of Antidumping and                                                                            7 See generally 19 CFR 351.303.
                                                                                                          companies is a simple average percentage margin
                                                                                                                                                                   8 See 19 CFR 351.303(f).
                                                  Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 79 FR       calculated based on the margins calculated for
                                                  58729 (September 30, 2014).                             Hyosung and Hyundai.                                     9 See 19 CFR 351.310(d).




                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:57 Sep 03, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00012   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\04SEN1.SGM      04SEN1


                                                                              Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 172 / Friday, September 4, 2015 / Notices                                                      53497

                                                  location of the hearing two days before                 exporter is not a firm covered in this                12. Recommendation
                                                  the scheduled date.                                     review, a prior review, or in the                     [FR Doc. 2015–22066 Filed 9–3–15; 8:45 am]
                                                     The Department intends to publish                    investigation but the manufacturer is,                BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
                                                  the final results of this administrative                the cash deposit rate will be the rate
                                                  review, including the results of its                    established for the most recent period
                                                  analysis of issues addressed in any case                for the manufacturer of the                           DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
                                                  or rebuttal brief, no later than 120 days               merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit
                                                  after publication of these preliminary                  rate for all other manufacturers or                   International Trade Administration
                                                  results, unless extended.10                             exporters will continue to be the all-                [C–570–946]
                                                                                                          others rate of 22.00 percent, which is
                                                  Assessment Rates
                                                                                                          the all-others rate established in the                Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire
                                                     Upon completion of this                              investigation.13 These cash deposit                   Strand From the People’s Republic of
                                                  administrative review, the Department                   requirements, when imposed, shall                     China: Final Results of Expedited First
                                                  shall determine, and Customs and                        remain in effect until further notice.                Sunset Review of Countervailing Duty
                                                  Border Protection (CBP) shall assess,                                                                         Order
                                                  antidumping duties on all appropriate                   Notification to Importers
                                                  entries.11 If respondents’ weighted-                                                                          AGENCY:   Enforcement and Compliance,
                                                                                                             This notice also serves as a reminder              International Trade Administration,
                                                  average dumping margin is not zero or                   to importers of their responsibility
                                                  de minimis in the final results of this                                                                       Department of Commerce.
                                                                                                          under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a                  SUMMARY: As a result of this sunset
                                                  review, we will calculate importer-                     certificate regarding the reimbursement
                                                  specific assessment rates on the basis of                                                                     review, the Department of Commerce
                                                                                                          of antidumping duties prior to                        (the ‘‘Department’’) finds that revocation
                                                  the ratio of the total amount of                        liquidation of the relevant entries
                                                  antidumping duties calculated for an                                                                          of the countervailing duty (‘‘CVD’’)
                                                                                                          during this review period. Failure to                 order on prestressed concrete steel wire
                                                  importer’s examined sales and the total                 comply with this requirement could
                                                  entered value of such sales in                                                                                strand (‘‘PC Strand’’) from the People’s
                                                                                                          result in the Department’s presumption                Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) would likely
                                                  accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).                   that reimbursement of antidumping
                                                  If respondents’ weighted-average                                                                              to lead to continuation or recurrence of
                                                                                                          duties occurred and the subsequent                    countervailable subsidies at the level
                                                  dumping margin is zero or de minimis                    assessment of double antidumping
                                                  in the final results of review, we will                                                                       indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of
                                                                                                          duties.                                               Review’’ section of this notice.
                                                  instruct CBP not to assess duties on any
                                                  of its entries in accordance with the                      We are issuing and publishing this                 DATES: Effective Date: September 4,
                                                  Final Modification for Reviews, i.e.,                   notice in accordance with sections                    2015.
                                                  ‘‘{w}here the weighted-average margin                   751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
                                                                                                                                                                FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                  of dumping for the exporter is                            Dated: August 31, 2015.                             James Terpstra, AD/CVD Operations,
                                                  determined to be zero or de minimis, no                 Paul Piquado,                                         Office III, Enforcement and Compliance,
                                                  antidumping duties will be assessed.’’ 12               Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and               International Trade Administration,
                                                     We intend to issue liquidation                       Compliance.                                           U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
                                                  instructions to CBP 15 days after                                                                             Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
                                                  publication of the final results of this                Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in
                                                                                                                                                                DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3965.
                                                  review.                                                 the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
                                                                                                                                                                SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                  Cash Deposit Requirements                               1. Background
                                                                                                          2. Companies Not Selected for Individual              Background
                                                     The following cash deposit                                Examination                                         On May 1, 2015, the Department
                                                  requirements will be effective upon                     3. Deadline for Submission of Updated Sales           initiated a sunset review of the Order 1
                                                  publication of the final results of this                     and Cost Information                             pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the
                                                  administrative review for all shipments                 4. Verification
                                                                                                                                                                Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
                                                  of the subject merchandise entered, or                  5. Scope of the Order
                                                                                                          6. Comparisons to Normal Value                        ‘‘Act’’) and 19 CFR 351.218(c).2 On May
                                                  withdrawn from warehouse, for                                                                                 15, 2015, the Department received a
                                                                                                             A. Determination of Comparison Method
                                                  consumption on or after the publication                    B. Results of the Differential Pricing             timely notification of intent to
                                                  date of the final results of this                            Analysis                                         participate from Insteel Wire Products
                                                  administrative review, as provided by                   7. Product Comparisons                                Company and Sumiden Wire Products
                                                  section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The                8. Date of Sale                                       Corporation (collectively, ‘‘Domestic
                                                  cash deposit rate for Hyosung and                       9. Constructed Export Price                           Parties’’ or ‘‘Petitioners’’), filed in
                                                  Hyundai will be that established in the                 10. Normal Value                                      accordance with 19 CFR
                                                  final results of this administrative                       A. Home Market Viability as Comparison             351.218(d)(1)(i). On June 1, 2015, the
                                                  review; (2) for previously reviewed or                       Market
                                                                                                                                                                Department received a substantive
                                                  investigated companies not listed above,                   B. Level of Trade
                                                                                                             C. Cost of Production                              response from Petitioners, timely filed
                                                  the cash deposit rate will continue to be                                                                     in accordance with 19 CFR
                                                                                                          1. Calculation of Cost of Production
                                                  the company-specific rate published for                 2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices             351.218(d)(3)(i).3 The Department did
                                                  the most recent period; (3) if the                      3. Results of the Cost of Production Test
                                                                                                                                                                   1 See Pre-Stressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand
                                                                                                             D. Calculation of Normal Value Based on
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                    10 See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act; 19 CFR                                                              from the People’s Republic of China: Notice of
                                                                                                               Comparison Market Prices
                                                  351.213(h).                                                E. Price-to-Constructed Value Comparison           Amended Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty
                                                    11 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).                                                                                Determination and Notice of Countervailing Duty
                                                                                                             F. Constructed Value                               Order, 75 FR 38977 (July 7, 2010) (‘‘Order’’).
                                                    12 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of
                                                                                                          11. Currency Conversion                                  2 See Initiation of Five-Year ‘‘Sunset’’ Review, 80
                                                  the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
                                                  Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping                                                                        FR 24900 (May 1, 2015).
                                                  Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102         13 See Large Power Transformers From the               3 See Letter to the Department, entitled

                                                  (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for             Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR      ‘‘Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from the
                                                  Reviews).                                               53177 (August 31, 2012).                                                                           Continued




                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:57 Sep 03, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00013   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\04SEN1.SGM   04SEN1



Document Created: 2015-12-15 09:58:28
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 09:58:28
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ContactBrian Davis or Edythe Artman, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 7924 or (202) 482-3931, respectively.
FR Citation80 FR 53496 

2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR