80 FR 53888 - Chloropicrin From China

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 173 (September 8, 2015)

Page Range		53888-53888
FR Document		2015-22061

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 173 (Tuesday, September 8, 2015)

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 173 (Tuesday, September 8, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 53888]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-22061]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-130 (Fourth Review)]


Chloropicrin From China

Determination

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
review, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, that 
revocation of the antidumping duty order on chloropicrin from China 
would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material 
injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably 
foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), instituted this review on April 1, 2015 (80 
FR 17496) and determined on July 6, 2015 that it would conduct an 
expedited review (80 FR 43461, July 22, 2015).
    The Commission made this determination pursuant to section 751(c) 
of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed 
its determination in this review on August 20, 2015. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4561 (August 2015), 
entitled Chloropicrin from China: Investigation No. 731-TA-130 (Fourth 
Review).

    By order of the Commission.
    Issued: September 1, 2015.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015-22061 Filed 9-4-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P

53888 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 173 / Tuesday, September 8, 2015 / Notices

investigation are or will be available for On August 7, 2015, the ALJ issued the Commission are contained in USITC
inspection during official business subject ID, granting intervenor status to Publication 4561 (August 2015), entitled
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Conexant and Waves Audio. The ALJ Chloropicrin from China: Investigation
Office of the Secretary, U.S. found that the motions complied with No. 731–TA–130 (Fourth Review).
International Trade Commission, 500 E 19 CFR 210.19 and Federal Rule of Civil By order of the Commission.
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Procedure 24 because the motions were Issued: September 1, 2015.
telephone (202) 205–2000. General timely and showed that Conexant and
Lisa R. Barton,
information concerning the Commission Waves Audio had an interest in the
may also be obtained by accessing its subject matter of the investigation that Secretary to the Commission.
Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). was not adequately represented by the [FR Doc. 2015–22061 Filed 9–4–15; 8:45 am]
The public record for this investigation existing parties. No petitions for review BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
may be viewed on the Commission’s of the subject ID were filed.
electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// The Commission has determined not
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired to review the subject ID. INTERNATIONAL TRADE
persons are advised that information on The authority for the Commission’s COMMISSION
this matter can be obtained by determination is contained in section
contacting the Commission’s TDD 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as [Investigation No. 731–TA–1070A (Second
terminal on (202) 205–1810. amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part Review)]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Commission instituted this investigation Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part Crepe Paper From China
on March 18, 2015, based on a 210).
Determination
complaint filed by Andrea Electronics By order of the Commission.
Corp. of Bohemia, New York Issued: September 2, 2015. On the basis of the record1 developed
(‘‘Andrea’’). 80 FR 14159–60 (March 18, Lisa R. Barton, in the subject five-year review, the
2015). The complaint alleges violations Secretary to the Commission. United States International Trade
of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
[FR Doc. 2015–22575 Filed 9–4–15; 8:45 am]
as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), in the determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
importation, sale for importation, and 1930, that revocation of the
sale after importation of audio antidumping duty order on crepe paper
processing articles that infringe five U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRADE from China would be likely to lead to
patents. The notice of investigation COMMISSION continuation or recurrence of material
named numerous respondents, some of injury to an industry in the United
whom have been previously terminated. [Investigation No. 731–TA–130 (Fourth
Review)]
States within a reasonably foreseeable
The notice also named the Office of time.
Unfair Import Investigations as a party.
On July 2, 2015, Conexant Systems Chloropicrin From China Background
Inc. (‘‘Conexant’’) moved to obtain Determination
intervenor status in the investigation. The Commission, pursuant to section
Conexant argued that, because Andrea On the basis of the record 1 developed 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19
alleges that Conexant’s audio in the subject five-year review, the U.S.C. 1675(c)), instituted this review
technology contained in the United States International Trade on April 1, 2015 (80 FR 17499) and
respondents’ products infringes the Commission (‘‘Commission’’) determined on July 6, 2015 that it would
asserted patents, Conexant has an determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of conduct an expedited review (80 FR
interest in the subject matter of the 1930, that revocation of the 43118, July 21, 2015).2
investigation. Conexant further argues antidumping duty order on chloropicrin
The Commission made this
that the respondents do not adequately from China would be likely to lead to
determination pursuant to section
represent Conexant’s interests because continuation or recurrence of material
751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19
Andrea has accused the audio injury to an industry in the United
U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed
technology made by multiple States within a reasonably foreseeable
its determination in this review on
companies, so the respondents may not time.
August 31, 2015. The views of the
necessarily have an interest in Background Commission are contained in USITC
defending Conexant’s specific audio Publication 4560 (August 2015), entitled
The Commission, pursuant to section
technology. On July 14, 2015, Andrea Crepe Paper from China: Investigation
751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19
filed a response in opposition to the No. 731–TA–1070A (Second Review).
U.S.C. 1675(c)), instituted this review
motion and the Commission
on April 1, 2015 (80 FR 17496) and By order of the Commission.
Investigative Attorney (‘‘IA’’) filed a Issued: September 1, 2015.
determined on July 6, 2015 that it would
response in support of the motion.
conduct an expedited review (80 FR Lisa R. Barton,
On July 14, 2015, Waves Audio, Ltd.
43461, July 22, 2015). Secretary to the Commission.
(‘‘Waves Audio’’) moved to obtain
The Commission made this [FR Doc. 2015–22056 Filed 9–4–15; 8:45 am]
intervenor status in the investigation for
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

determination pursuant to section
substantially the same reasons as BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19
Conexant. Additionally, Waves Audio
U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed
argued that it has indemnity obligations 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
its determination in this review on
to the extent that its products are a part Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
August 20, 2015. The views of the CFR 207.2(f)).
of the investigation. On July 20, 2015, 2 Chairman Broadbent and Commissioner Kieff
Andrea filed a response in opposition to 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the concluded that the respondent group response was
the motion and the IA filed a response Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 inadequate, but that the circumstances warranted a
in support of the motion. CFR 207.2(f)). full review.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:18 Sep 04, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00130 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM 08SEN1

Document Created: 2018-02-26 10:13:45
Document Modified: 2018-02-26 10:13:45

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
FR Citation		80 FR 53888