80 FR 60672 - Registration Review Proposed Interim Decisions; Notice of Availability
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 194 (October 7, 2015)
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 194 (October 7, 2015)
| Page Range | 60672-60674 | |
| FR Document | 2015-25435 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 194 (Wednesday, October 7, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 60672-60674] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-25435] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0099; FRL-9934-47] Registration Review Proposed Interim Decisions; Notice of Availability AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of EPA's proposed interim registration review decisions for the pesticides listed in the table in Unit II of this notice, and opens a public comment period on the proposed interim decisions. This notice also opens the dockets and announces the availability of EPA's Preliminary Work Plan and proposed interim registration review decisions for 2H-Cyclopent(d)isothiazol- 3(4H)-one, 5,6-dihydro-2-methyl- and Bacillus thuringiensis, Plant- incorporated Protectants in Corn, and a Preliminary Work Plan, draft risk assessments and proposed interim decision for Aquashade. Registration review is EPA's periodic review of pesticide registrations to ensure that each pesticide continues to satisfy the statutory standard for registration, that is, that the pesticide can perform its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on human health or the environment. Through this program, EPA is ensuring that each pesticide's registration is based on current scientific and other knowledge, including its effects on human health and the environment. DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 7, 2015. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by the docket identification (ID) number for the specific pesticide of interest provided in the table in Unit II., by one of the following methods:Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For pesticide specific information, contact: The Chemical Review Manager for the pesticide of interest identified in the table in Unit II. For general information on the registration review program, contact: Richard Dumas, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (703) 308-8015; email address: [email protected]. [[Page 60673]] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. General Information A. Does this action apply to me? This action is directed to the public in general, and may be of interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human health, farm worker, and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry; pesticide users; and members of the public interested in the sale, distribution, or use of pesticides. Since others also may be interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific entities that may be affected by this action. If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the Chemical Review Manager for the pesticide of interest identified in the table in Unit II. B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA? 1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. 2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting your comments, see the commenting tips at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html. II. What action is the agency taking? Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.58, this notice announces the availability of EPA's proposed interim registration review decisions for the pesticides shown in the following table, and opens a 60-day public comment period on the proposed interim decisions. Table--Registration Review Proposed Interim Decisions ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Chemical review Registration review case Pesticide Docket ID manager, email name and No. No. address, and telephone No. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ D-Limonene (Case 3083)...... EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0673 Caitlin Newcamp, [email protected], 703-347-0325. Hydrogen cyanamide (Case EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-1014 Dana Friedman, 7005). [email protected], 703-347-8827. 2H-Cyclopent(d)isothiazol- EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0266 Donna Kamarei, 3(4H)-one, 5,6-dihydro-2- [email protected] methyl- (Case 5018). ov, 703-347-0443. Aquashade (Case 4010)....... EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0639 Christina Motilall, [email protected], 703-603- 0522. Bacillus thuringiensis Plant- EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0584 Alan Reynolds, incorporated Protectants in [email protected] Corn (Cases 6501 and 6502). ov, 703-605-0515. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The registration review final decisions for these cases are dependent on the assessments of listed species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), determinations on the potential for endocrine disruption, and/or assessments of exposure and risk to pollinators. D-Limonene (Proposed Interim Decision). D-limonene is a naturally occurring chemical obtained from the rind of citrus fruits. It is registered as an active ingredient for use as an acaricide, insecticide, herbicide, and insect repellent, and is an inert ingredient in other products providing scent and flavoring. D-limonene is currently registered for use in/on terrestrial food (citrus, pome fruits, grapes), feed crops, non-food crops (ornamentals, Christmas trees, fencerows, recreational areas, wood protection) and for residential uses. EPA published draft registration review human health and ecological risk assessments in December 2014. For the human health assessment, no data deficiencies were identified in either the toxicity or exposure databases and the Agency concluded that d-limonene does not pose human health risks. For the ecological risk assessment, the Agency found that, due to its high volatility, low usage, and low toxicity to most taxa, d-limonene is expected to have negligible effects to most taxa. The Agency is proposing modifications to several labels to reduce potential risks to d-limonene for terrestrial plants and mammals. Hydrogen cyanamide (Proposed Interim Decision). Hydrogen cyanamide is a plant growth regulator used to promote uniform bud break in orchard fruit trees and vines, and does not have any residential uses. It is the only registered plant growth regulator available to induce uniform bud break in U.S. fruit production, and there are significant economic benefits associated with its use in areas where the critical number of chilling hours needed for bud break does not occur or is not consistent. The Agency conducted a comprehensive human health risk assessment and determined that there are potential risks of concern for occupational handlers, as well as spray drift concerns for bystanders. However, the occupational risks identified can be mitigated through modifications to product labels, and spray drift concerns are already addressed by current labels. The Agency also conducted an ecological risk assessment and determined that there are potential risks of concern for terrestrial animals, but current use practices and label mitigation addresses many of these concerns. 2H-Cyclopent(d)isothiazol- 3(4H)-one, 5,6-dihydro-2- methyl- (Combined Preliminary Work Plan and Proposed Interim Decision). There is one EPA-registered product containing 2H-Cyclopent(d)isothiazol- 3(4H)-one, 5,6-dihydro-2- methyl-, also known as MTI, as an active ingredient for material preservation of imaging products. The Agency does not anticipate the need to call-in any data in support of MTI's registration review. Additionally, the Agency does not anticipate conducting human health or environmental risk assessments due to the lack of exposure concerns for MTI's registered use. Based on the lack of potential exposure, the Agency is proposing to make a No Effects determination for listed species under the ESA. EPA is announcing the availability for public comment on the combined preliminary work plan and proposed interim registration review decision for MTI. This proposed interim [[Page 60674]] decision does not cover the EDSP component of this registration review case. The Agency's final registration review decision is dependent upon the evaluation of potential endocrine disruptor risk. Aquashade (Combined Preliminary Work Plan, Draft Risk Assessments and Proposed Interim Decision). Aquashade is as an aquatic herbicide for which the mode of action is light filtration. It is primarily used in small water bodies such as ornamental ponds and small lakes, fountains and other landscaping water features, swimming holes, aquaculture ponds, and animal watering holes. The Agency conducted an ecological risk assessment and determined there are no risks of concern for any assessed taxa. The Agency also conducted a human health risk assessment and there were no dietary, residential, or occupational risks of concern. The Agency is not proposing any risk mitigation or additional data requirements for Aquashade at this time. Bacillus thuringiensis Plant-incorporated Protectants in Corn (Combined Preliminary Work Plan and Proposed Interim Decision). Plant- incorporated protectants (PIPs) derived from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) have been genetically engineered into corn hybrids to provide insecticidal protection against certain pests. One class (case 6501) of Bt corn PIPs targets lepidopteran stalk-boring and ear-feeding insects (e.g., European corn borer, corn earworm, and southwestern corn borer); a second class (case 6502) targets coleopteran root-feeding insects (corn rootworm). EPA has conducted extensive risk assessments addressing human health (including food safety), non-target wildlife, environmental fate, gene flow, and insect resistance management for all registered products. No human health risks of concern or risks of concern to non-listed species (including honey bees and Monarch butterflies) have been identified. In addition, the Agency is proposing to make No Effects determinations under the ESA for all listed species. EPA will update these assessments for the final registration review. No risk mitigation measures for human health or ecological effects are included in the proposed interim decision. The registration review docket for a pesticide includes earlier documents related to the registration review of the case. For example, the review typically opens with the availability of a Summary Document, containing a Preliminary Work Plan, for public comment. A Final Work Plan typically is placed in the docket following public comment on the initial docket. Following a period for public comment on the proposed interim registration review decisions for products containing the affected active ingredients, the Agency will issue interim registration review decisions for products containing the affected active ingredients. The registration review program is being conducted under congressionally mandated time frames, and EPA recognizes the need both to make timely decisions and to involve the public. Section 3(g) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) (7 U.S.C. 136a(g)) required EPA to establish by regulation procedures for reviewing pesticide registrations, originally with a goal of reviewing each pesticide's registration every 15 years to ensure that a pesticide continues to meet the FIFRA standard for registration. The Agency's final rule to implement this program was issued in the Federal Register of August 9, 2006 (71 FR 45720) (FRL-8080-4) and became effective in October 2006, and appears at 40 CFR part 155, subpart C. The Pesticide Registration Improvement Act of 2003 (PRIA) was amended and extended in September 2007. FIFRA, as amended by PRIA in 2007, requires EPA to complete registration review decisions by October 1, 2022, for all pesticides registered as of October 1, 2007. The registration review final rule at 40 CFR 155.58(a) provides for a minimum 60-day public comment period on all proposed interim registration review decisions. This comment period is intended to provide an opportunity for public input and a mechanism for initiating any necessary amendments to the proposed interim decisions. All comments should be submitted using the methods in ADDRESSES, and must be received by EPA on or before the closing date. These comments will become part of the docket for the pesticides included in the table in Unit II. Comments received after the close of the comment period will be marked ``late.'' EPA is not required to consider these late comments. The Agency will carefully consider all comments received by the closing date and will provide a ``Response to Comments Memorandum'' in the docket for each of the pesticides included in the table in Unit II. The interim registration review decision will explain the effect that any comments had on the decision and provide the Agency's response to significant comments, as needed. Background on the registration review program is provided at: http://www2.epa.gov/pesticide-reevaluation. Links to earlier documents related to the registration review of the pesticide cases identified in this notice are provided on the Pesticide Chemical Search data base accessible at: http://iaspub.epa.gov/apex/pesticides/f?p=chemicalsearch:1. Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq. Dated: September 25, 2015. Richard P. Keigwin, Jr., Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide Programs. [FR Doc. 2015-25435 Filed 10-6-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![60672 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 194 / Wednesday, October 7, 2015 / Notices
1404; email address: TSCA-Hotline@ adhesives. Sulfated castor oil is a interim decisions. This notice also
epa.gov. wetting agent used in dyeing and opens the dockets and announces the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
finishing cotton and linen fabrics. availability of EPA’s Preliminary Work
Adding sulphuric acid to castor oil also Plan and proposed interim registration
I. Chemical Substances and/or Mixtures produced an emulsifier for insecticidal review decisions for 2H-
Information about the following oils. Cyclopent(d)isothiazol-3(4H)-one, 5,6-
chemical substances and/or mixtures is 2. Applicable Test Rule: Chemical dihydro-2-methyl- and Bacillus
provided in Unit IV.: testing requirements for second group of thuringiensis, Plant-incorporated
high production volume chemicals Protectants in Corn, and a Preliminary
A. Castor oil, sulfated, sodium salt (CAS (HPV2), 40 CFR 799.5087. Work Plan, draft risk assessments and
RN 68187–76–8) 3. Test Data Received: The following proposed interim decision for
II. Federal Register Publication listing describes the nature of the test Aquashade. Registration review is EPA’s
Requirement data received. The test data will be periodic review of pesticide
added to the docket for the applicable registrations to ensure that each
Section 4(d) of TSCA (15 U.S.C. TSCA section 4 test rule and can be pesticide continues to satisfy the
2603(d)) requires EPA to publish a found by referencing the docket ID statutory standard for registration, that
notice in the Federal Register reporting number provided. EPA reviews of test is, that the pesticide can perform its
the receipt of test data submitted data will be added to the same docket intended function without unreasonable
pursuant to test rules promulgated upon completion. adverse effects on human health or the
under TSCA section 4 (15 U.S.C. 2603). a. Physical/Chemical Properties: environment. Through this program,
III. Docket Information Melting Point (A1), Boiling Point (A2). EPA is ensuring that each pesticide’s
The docket ID number assigned to this registration is based on current
A docket, identified by the docket data is EPA–HQ–OPPT–2007–0531. scientific and other knowledge,
identification (ID) number EPA–HQ– b. Mammalian Acute Toxicity Test, including its effects on human health
OPPT–2013–0677, has been established Oral (D). The docket ID number and the environment.
for this Federal Register document that assigned to this data is EPA–HQ–OPPT–
announces the receipt of data. Upon DATES: Comments must be received on
2007–0531. or before December 7, 2015.
EPA’s completion of its quality c. Acute Toxicity Test (Fish, Daphnia,
assurance review, the test data received ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
and Plants (Algae)) (C1). The docket ID
will be added to the docket for the identified by the docket identification
number assigned to this data is EPA–
TSCA section 4 test rule that required (ID) number for the specific pesticide of
HQ–OPPT–2007–0531.
the test data. Use the docket ID number interest provided in the table in Unit II.,
d. Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test
provided in Unit IV. to access the test by one of the following methods:
(E1). The docket ID number assigned to • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://
data in the docket for the related TSCA this data is EPA–HQ–OPPT–2007–0531.
section 4 test rule. www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
e. Chromosomal Aberration Test (E2).
The docket for this Federal Register instructions for submitting comments.
The docket ID number assigned to this
document and the docket for each Do not submit electronically any
data is EPA–HQ–OPPT–2007–0531.
related TSCA section 4 test rule is information you consider to be
f. Combined Repeat Dose Study with
available electronically at http:// Confidential Business Information (CBI)
the Reproductive/Developmental
www.regulations.gov or in person at the or other information whose disclosure is
Toxicity Screening Test (F1). The docket
Office of Pollution Prevention and restricted by statute.
ID number assigned to this data is EPA– • Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Toxics Docket (OPPT Docket), HQ–OPPT–2007–0531.
Environmental Protection Agency Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq. DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Dated: September 30, 2015. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, Maria J. Doa, • Hand Delivery: To make special
DC. The Public Reading Room is open Director, Chemical Control Division, Office
arrangements for hand delivery or
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday of Pollution Prevention and Toxics. delivery of boxed information, please
through Friday, excluding legal [FR Doc. 2015–25591 Filed 10–6–15; 8:45 am]
follow the instructions at http://
holidays. The telephone number for the www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, Additional instructions on
and the telephone number for the OPPT commenting or visiting the docket,
Docket is (202) 566–0280. Please review ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION along with more information about
the visitor instructions and additional AGENCY dockets generally, is available at
information about the docket available http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0099; FRL–9934–47] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
pesticide specific information, contact:
IV. Test Data Received Registration Review Proposed Interim
The Chemical Review Manager for the
Decisions; Notice of Availability
This unit contains the information pesticide of interest identified in the
required by TSCA section 4(d) for the AGENCY: Environmental Protection table in Unit II.
For general information on the
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
test data received by EPA. Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice. registration review program, contact:
A. Castor oil, sulfated, sodium salt (CAS Richard Dumas, Pesticide Re-Evaluation
RN 68187–76–8) SUMMARY: This notice announces the Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide
1. Chemical Uses: Castor oil and its availability of EPA’s proposed interim Programs, Environmental Protection
derivatives are used in a wide variety of registration review decisions for the Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
industrial applications, including as a pesticides listed in the table in Unit II Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
raw material for paints, coatings, inks, of this notice, and opens a public number: (703) 308–8015; email address:
lubricants, perfume formulations, and comment period on the proposed dumas.richard@epa.gov.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:12 Oct 06, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM 07OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_60866/page/1.svg)
![60674 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 194 / Wednesday, October 7, 2015 / Notices
decision does not cover the EDSP comment on the initial docket. www2.epa.gov/pesticide-reevaluation.
component of this registration review Following a period for public comment Links to earlier documents related to the
case. The Agency’s final registration on the proposed interim registration registration review of the pesticide cases
review decision is dependent upon the review decisions for products identified in this notice are provided on
evaluation of potential endocrine containing the affected active the Pesticide Chemical Search data base
disruptor risk. ingredients, the Agency will issue accessible at: http://iaspub.epa.gov/
Aquashade (Combined Preliminary interim registration review decisions for apex/pesticides/f?p=chemicalsearch:1.
Work Plan, Draft Risk Assessments and products containing the affected active Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.
Proposed Interim Decision). Aquashade ingredients.
is as an aquatic herbicide for which the The registration review program is Dated: September 25, 2015.
mode of action is light filtration. It is being conducted under congressionally Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.,
primarily used in small water bodies mandated time frames, and EPA Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division,
such as ornamental ponds and small recognizes the need both to make timely Office of Pesticide Programs.
lakes, fountains and other landscaping decisions and to involve the public. [FR Doc. 2015–25435 Filed 10–6–15; 8:45 am]
water features, swimming holes, Section 3(g) of the Federal Insecticide, BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
aquaculture ponds, and animal watering Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
holes. The Agency conducted an (7 U.S.C. 136a(g)) required EPA to
ecological risk assessment and establish by regulation procedures for ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
determined there are no risks of concern reviewing pesticide registrations, AGENCY
for any assessed taxa. The Agency also originally with a goal of reviewing each [EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0601; FRL–9934–20]
conducted a human health risk pesticide’s registration every 15 years to
assessment and there were no dietary, ensure that a pesticide continues to Notice of Receipt of Requests for
residential, or occupational risks of meet the FIFRA standard for Amendments To Terminate Uses in
concern. The Agency is not proposing registration. The Agency’s final rule to Certain Pesticide Registrations
any risk mitigation or additional data implement this program was issued in
requirements for Aquashade at this the Federal Register of August 9, 2006 AGENCY: Environmental Protection
time. (71 FR 45720) (FRL–8080–4) and Agency (EPA).
Bacillus thuringiensis Plant- became effective in October 2006, and ACTION: Notice.
incorporated Protectants in Corn appears at 40 CFR part 155, subpart C.
(Combined Preliminary Work Plan and The Pesticide Registration Improvement SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Proposed Interim Decision). Plant- Act of 2003 (PRIA) was amended and Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
incorporated protectants (PIPs) derived extended in September 2007. FIFRA, as Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), EPA is issuing
from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) have amended by PRIA in 2007, requires EPA a notice of receipt of request for
been genetically engineered into corn to complete registration review amendments by registrants to terminate
hybrids to provide insecticidal decisions by October 1, 2022, for all uses in certain pesticide registrations.
protection against certain pests. One pesticides registered as of October 1, FIFRA provides that a registrant of a
class (case 6501) of Bt corn PIPs targets 2007. pesticide product may at any time
lepidopteran stalk-boring and ear- The registration review final rule at 40 request that any of its pesticide
feeding insects (e.g., European corn CFR 155.58(a) provides for a minimum registrations be amended to terminate
borer, corn earworm, and southwestern 60-day public comment period on all one or more uses. FIFRA further
corn borer); a second class (case 6502) proposed interim registration review provides that, before acting on the
targets coleopteran root-feeding insects decisions. This comment period is request, EPA must publish a notice of
(corn rootworm). EPA has conducted intended to provide an opportunity for receipt of any request in the Federal
extensive risk assessments addressing public input and a mechanism for Register.
human health (including food safety), initiating any necessary amendments to DATES: Unless a request is withdrawn by
non-target wildlife, environmental fate, the proposed interim decisions. All November 6, 2015 for registrations for
gene flow, and insect resistance comments should be submitted using which the registrant requested a waiver
management for all registered products. the methods in ADDRESSES, and must be of the 180-day comment period, EPA
No human health risks of concern or received by EPA on or before the closing expects to issue orders terminating these
risks of concern to non-listed species date. These comments will become part uses. The Agency will consider
(including honey bees and Monarch of the docket for the pesticides included
withdrawal requests postmarked no
butterflies) have been identified. In in the table in Unit II. Comments
later than November 6, 2015. Comments
addition, the Agency is proposing to received after the close of the comment
must be received on or before November
make No Effects determinations under period will be marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not
6, 2015, for those registrations where the
the ESA for all listed species. EPA will required to consider these late
180-day comment period has been
update these assessments for the final comments.
waived.
registration review. No risk mitigation The Agency will carefully consider all
measures for human health or ecological comments received by the closing date ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
effects are included in the proposed and will provide a ‘‘Response to identified by docket identification (ID)
interim decision. Comments Memorandum’’ in the docket number EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0601, by
The registration review docket for a for each of the pesticides included in one of the following methods:
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
pesticide includes earlier documents the table in Unit II. The interim • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://
related to the registration review of the registration review decision will explain www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
case. For example, the review typically the effect that any comments had on the instructions for submitting comments.
opens with the availability of a decision and provide the Agency’s Do not submit electronically any
Summary Document, containing a response to significant comments, as information you consider to be
Preliminary Work Plan, for public needed. Confidential Business Information (CBI)
comment. A Final Work Plan typically Background on the registration review or other information whose disclosure is
is placed in the docket following public program is provided at: http:// restricted by statute.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:12 Oct 06, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00064 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM 07OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_60866/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-15 08:49:22
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 08:49:22
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice. | |
| Dates | Comments must be received on or before December 7, 2015. | |
| Contact | For pesticide specific information, contact: The Chemical Review Manager for the pesticide of interest identified in the table in Unit II. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 60672 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR