80 FR 61842 - Certain Personal Transporters, Components Thereof, and Manuals Therefor; Commission Determination To Review in Part an Initial Determination Granting Complainant's Motion for Summary Determination of Violation of Section 337 and, on Review, To Modify the Initial Determination; Request for Written Submissions on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 198 (October 14, 2015)
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 198 (October 14, 2015)
| Page Range | 61842-61843 | |
| FR Document | 2015-26048 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 198 (Wednesday, October 14, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 61842-61843] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-26048] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337-TA-935] Certain Personal Transporters, Components Thereof, and Manuals Therefor; Commission Determination To Review in Part an Initial Determination Granting Complainant's Motion for Summary Determination of Violation of Section 337 and, on Review, To Modify the Initial Determination; Request for Written Submissions on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to review in part an initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 28) of the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'') granting complainants' motion for summary determination of violation of section 337 and, on review, to make certain modifications in the ID. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3115. Copies of non- confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (``Section 337''), on November 10, 2014, based on a complaint filed by Segway, Inc. of Bedford, New Hampshire (``Segway'') and DEKA Products Limited Partnership of Manchester, New Hampshire (``DEKA'') (collectively, ``Complainants''). 79 FR 66739-40 (Nov. 10, 2014). The amended complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of Section 337 by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,789,640 (``the '640 patent''); 7,275,607 (``the '607 patent''); and 8,830,048 (``the '048 patent''); the claim of U.S. Design Patent No. D551,722 (``the '722 design patent''); the claim of U.S. Design Patent No. D551,592 (``the '592 design patent''); and U.S. Copyright Registration No. TX-7-800-563 by numerous respondents. Id. In particular, the notice of investigation named the following thirteen entities as respondents: Ninebot Inc., Ninebot (Tianjin) Technology Co., Ltd., and PowerUnion (Beijing) Tech Co. Ltd. (the ``Ninebot Respondents''); Robstep Robot Co., Ltd. (``Robstep''); Shenzhen INMOTION Technologies Co., Ltd. (``INMOTION''); Tech in the City; and Freego USA, LLC (``FreeGo USA'') (collectively, ``Terminated Respondents''); UPTECH Robotics Technology Co., Ltd. (``UPTECH''); Beijing Universal Pioneering Technology Co., Ltd. (``U.P. Technology''); Beijing Universal Pioneering Robotics Co., Ltd. (``U.P. Robotics''); FreeGo High-Tech Corporation Limited (``FreeGo China''); and EcoBoomer Co. Ltd. (``EcoBoomer'') (collectively, ``Defaulting Respondents''); and Roboscooters.com (``Roboscooters''). The Commission's Office of Unfair Import Investigations was also named as a party. In the course of the investigation, the ALJ issued the following IDs with respect to the Terminated Respondents: ALJ Order Nos. 13 (Feb. 19, 2015) (not reviewed Mar. 18, 2015) (terminating respondent FreeGo USA by consent order); 19 (May 4, 2015) (not reviewed May 20, 2015) (terminating respondent Robstep by settlement); 23 (Jun. 19, 2015) (not reviewed Jul. 15, 2015) (terminating respondent INMOTION by settlement); 24 (Jul. 8, 2015) (not reviewed Jul. 28, 2015) (terminating respondent Tech in the City by consent order); and 27 (Aug. 20, 2015) (not reviewed Sept. 18, 2015) (terminating the Ninebot Respondents by settlement). The ALJ also issued an ID finding all of the Defaulting Respondents in default. See ALJ Order No. 20 (May 7, 2015) (not reviewed May 27, 2015). The sole remaining respondent Roboscooters participated in a preliminary teleconference on December 15, 2014, filed an answer to the complaint and notice of investigation (Dec. 31, 2014), partially responded to one set of Requests for Document Production, and produced a corporate witness for deposition on May 6, 2015, but did not otherwise participate in the investigation. On July 8, 2015, Complainants filed a motion for summary determination of violation of Section 337 by defaulting respondents and respondent Roboscooters. The Commission investigative attorney filed a response in support of the motion. No other responses were filed. On August 21, 2015, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 28) granting Complainants' motion and making recommendations regarding remedy and bonding. The ID finds, inter alia, a violation of Section 337 under subsection 337(g)(2) by reason of infringement of the '048 patent based on substantial, reliable, and probative evidence. 19 U.S.C. 1337(g)(2). The ID also finds a violation by the defaulting respondents and respondent Roboscooters by reason of infringement of the '640 patent, the '607 patent, the '722 design patent, the '592 design patent, and U.S. Copyright Registration No. TX-7-800-563. No party petitioned for review of the ID. The Commission has determined to review the ID in part and, on review, to clarify that the authority for the ALJ to draw adverse inferences against respondent Roboscooters for its failures to act during the investigation and find Roboscooters in violation is found in Commission Rule 210.17, 19 CFR 210.17. On review, the Commission also corrects certain apparent typographical errors. Specifically, in the last paragraph on page 45, ``Ex. 19'' should be substituted for ``Ex. 9,'' the ``FreeGo F3'' should be substituted for the ``WindRunner G1U.'' Likewise, we [[Page 61843]] substitute ``Focxess'' for ``Estway'' in the last paragraph on page 60. See ID at 45; 60. Furthermore, we substitute the clause ``In support of their allegations in the Complaint that the Gen 2 PT vehicles practice claims of the Asserted Utility Patents,'' for the first clause of the last sentence on page 65 of the ID. See ID at 65-66. In connection with the final disposition of this investigation, the Commission may (1) issue an order that could result in the exclusion of the subject articles from entry into the United States, and/or (2) issue one or more cease and desist orders that could result in the respondent being required to cease and desist from engaging in unfair acts in the importation and sale of such articles. Accordingly, the Commission is interested in receiving written submissions that address the form of remedy, if any, that should be ordered. If a party seeks exclusion of an article from entry into the United States for purposes other than entry for consumption, the party should so indicate and provide information establishing that activities involving other types of entry either are adversely affecting it or are likely to do so. For background, see In the Matter of Certain Devices for Connecting Computers via Telephone Lines, Inv. No. 337-TA-360, USITC Pub. No. 2843 (Dec. 1994) (Commission Opinion). If the Commission contemplates some form of remedy, it must consider the effects of that remedy upon the public interest. The factors the Commission will consider include the effect that an exclusion order and/or cease and desist orders would have on (1) the public health and welfare, (2) competitive conditions in the U.S. economy, (3) U.S. production of articles that are like or directly competitive with those that are subject to investigation, and (4) U.S. consumers. The Commission is therefore interested in receiving written submissions that address the aforementioned public interest factors in the context of this investigation. If the Commission orders some form of remedy, the U.S. Trade Representative, as delegated by the President, has 60 days to approve or disapprove the Commission's action. During this period, the subject articles would be entitled to enter the United States under bond, in an amount determined by the Commission and prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury. The Commission is therefore interested in receiving submissions concerning the amount of the bond that should be imposed if a remedy is ordered. Written Submissions: Parties to the investigation, interested government agencies, and any other interested parties are encouraged to file written submissions on the issues of remedy, the public interest, and bonding. Complainants and the IA are also requested to submit proposed remedial orders for the Commission's consideration. Complainants are further requested to provide the expiration dates of each of the asserted patents and copyright, and state the HTSUS subheadings under which the accused articles are imported. Complainants are also requested to supply the names of known importers of the infringing articles. The written submissions and proposed remedial orders must be filed no later than the close of business on October 21, 2015. Reply submissions must be filed no later than the close of business on October 28, 2015. Such submissions should address the ALJ's recommended determinations on remedy and bonding which were made in Order No. 28. No further submissions on these issues will be permitted unless otherwise ordered by the Commission. Persons filing written submissions must file the original document electronically on or before the deadlines stated above and submit 8 true paper copies to the Office of the Secretary by noon the next day pursuant to section 210.4(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to the investigation number (``Inv. No. 337-TA-935'') in a prominent place on the cover page and/or the first page. (See Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures, http://www.usitc.gov/secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf). Persons with questions regarding filing should contact the Secretary (202-205-2000). Any person desiring to submit a document to the Commission in confidence must request confidential treatment. All such requests should be directed to the Secretary to the Commission and must include a full statement of the reasons why the Commission should grant such treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents for which confidential treatment by the Commission is properly sought will be treated accordingly. A redacted non-confidential version of the document must also be filed simultaneously with any confidential filing. All non-confidential written submissions will be available for public inspection at the Office of the Secretary and on EDIS. The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: October 7, 2015. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2015-26048 Filed 10-13-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
![61842 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 198 / Wednesday, October 14, 2015 / Notices
International Trade Commission, hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the reviewed Mar. 18, 2015) (terminating
Washington, DC, and by publishing the Office of the Secretary, U.S. respondent FreeGo USA by consent
notice in the Federal Register on May International Trade Commission, 500 E order); 19 (May 4, 2015) (not reviewed
7, 2015 (80 FR 26296). The hearing was Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, May 20, 2015) (terminating respondent
held in Washington, DC, on August 13, telephone (202) 205–2000. General Robstep by settlement); 23 (Jun. 19,
2015, and all persons who requested the information concerning the Commission 2015) (not reviewed Jul. 15, 2015)
opportunity were permitted to appear in may also be obtained by accessing its (terminating respondent INMOTION by
person or by counsel. Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. settlement); 24 (Jul. 8, 2015) (not
The Commission made these The public record for this investigation reviewed Jul. 28, 2015) (terminating
determinations pursuant to sections may be viewed on the Commission’s respondent Tech in the City by consent
705(b) and 735(b) of the Tariff Act of electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// order); and 27 (Aug. 20, 2015) (not
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b) and 19 U.S.C. edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired reviewed Sept. 18, 2015) (terminating
1673d(b)). It completed and filed its persons are advised that information on the Ninebot Respondents by settlement).
determinations in these investigations this matter can be obtained by The ALJ also issued an ID finding all of
on October 7, 2015. The views of the contacting the Commission’s TDD the Defaulting Respondents in default.
Commission are contained in USITC terminal on (202) 205–1810. See ALJ Order No. 20 (May 7, 2015) (not
Publication 4565 (October 2015), SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The reviewed May 27, 2015). The sole
entitled Boltless Steel Shelving Units Commission instituted this investigation remaining respondent Roboscooters
Prepackaged for Sale From China: under section 337 of the Tariff Act of participated in a preliminary
Investigation Nos. 701–TA–523 and 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 teleconference on December 15, 2014,
731–TA–1259 (Final). (‘‘Section 337’’), on November 10, 2014, filed an answer to the complaint and
By order of the Commission. based on a complaint filed by Segway, notice of investigation (Dec. 31, 2014),
Inc. of Bedford, New Hampshire partially responded to one set of
Issued: October 7, 2015.
(‘‘Segway’’) and DEKA Products Limited Requests for Document Production, and
Lisa R. Barton, produced a corporate witness for
Secretary to the Commission. Partnership of Manchester, New
deposition on May 6, 2015, but did not
Hampshire (‘‘DEKA’’) (collectively,
[FR Doc. 2015–26049 Filed 10–13–15; 8:45 am] otherwise participate in the
‘‘Complainants’’). 79 FR 66739–40 (Nov.
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P investigation.
10, 2014). The amended complaint, as On July 8, 2015, Complainants filed a
supplemented, alleges violations of motion for summary determination of
INTERNATIONAL TRADE Section 337 by reason of infringement of violation of Section 337 by defaulting
COMMISSION certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. respondents and respondent
6,789,640 (‘‘the ’640 patent’’); 7,275,607 Roboscooters. The Commission
[Investigation No. 337–TA–935] (‘‘the ’607 patent’’); and 8,830,048 (‘‘the investigative attorney filed a response in
’048 patent’’); the claim of U.S. Design support of the motion. No other
Certain Personal Transporters, Patent No. D551,722 (‘‘the ’722 design
Components Thereof, and Manuals responses were filed.
patent’’); the claim of U.S. Design Patent On August 21, 2015, the ALJ issued
Therefor; Commission Determination No. D551,592 (‘‘the ’592 design patent’’);
To Review in Part an Initial an ID (Order No. 28) granting
and U.S. Copyright Registration No. TX– Complainants’ motion and making
Determination Granting Complainant’s 7–800–563 by numerous respondents.
Motion for Summary Determination of recommendations regarding remedy and
Id. In particular, the notice of bonding. The ID finds, inter alia, a
Violation of Section 337 and, on investigation named the following
Review, To Modify the Initial violation of Section 337 under
thirteen entities as respondents: Ninebot subsection 337(g)(2) by reason of
Determination; Request for Written Inc., Ninebot (Tianjin) Technology Co.,
Submissions on Remedy, the Public infringement of the ’048 patent based on
Ltd., and PowerUnion (Beijing) Tech Co. substantial, reliable, and probative
Interest, and Bonding Ltd. (the ‘‘Ninebot Respondents’’); evidence. 19 U.S.C. 1337(g)(2). The ID
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Robstep Robot Co., Ltd. (‘‘Robstep’’); also finds a violation by the defaulting
Commission. Shenzhen INMOTION Technologies Co., respondents and respondent
ACTION: Notice. Ltd. (‘‘INMOTION’’); Tech in the City; Roboscooters by reason of infringement
and Freego USA, LLC (‘‘FreeGo USA’’) of the ’640 patent, the ’607 patent, the
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that (collectively, ‘‘Terminated ’722 design patent, the ’592 design
the U.S. International Trade Respondents’’); UPTECH Robotics patent, and U.S. Copyright Registration
Commission has determined to review Technology Co., Ltd. (‘‘UPTECH’’); No. TX–7–800–563. No party petitioned
in part an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) Beijing Universal Pioneering for review of the ID.
(Order No. 28) of the presiding Technology Co., Ltd. (‘‘U.P. The Commission has determined to
administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) Technology’’); Beijing Universal review the ID in part and, on review, to
granting complainants’ motion for Pioneering Robotics Co., Ltd. (‘‘U.P. clarify that the authority for the ALJ to
summary determination of violation of Robotics’’); FreeGo High-Tech draw adverse inferences against
section 337 and, on review, to make Corporation Limited (‘‘FreeGo China’’); respondent Roboscooters for its failures
certain modifications in the ID. and EcoBoomer Co. Ltd. (‘‘EcoBoomer’’) to act during the investigation and find
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (collectively, ‘‘Defaulting Roboscooters in violation is found in
Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the Respondents’’); and Roboscooters.com Commission Rule 210.17, 19 CFR
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
General Counsel, U.S. International (‘‘Roboscooters’’). The Commission’s 210.17. On review, the Commission also
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Office of Unfair Import Investigations corrects certain apparent typographical
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) was also named as a party. errors. Specifically, in the last paragraph
205–3115. Copies of non-confidential In the course of the investigation, the on page 45, ‘‘Ex. 19’’ should be
documents filed in connection with this ALJ issued the following IDs with substituted for ‘‘Ex. 9,’’ the ‘‘FreeGo F3’’
investigation are or will be available for respect to the Terminated Respondents: should be substituted for the
inspection during official business ALJ Order Nos. 13 (Feb. 19, 2015) (not ‘‘WindRunner G1U.’’ Likewise, we
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:39 Oct 13, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM 14OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_62040/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 198 / Wednesday, October 14, 2015 / Notices 61843
substitute ‘‘Focxess’’ for ‘‘Estway’’ in the Written Submissions: Parties to the 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
last paragraph on page 60. See ID at 45; investigation, interested government amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
60. Furthermore, we substitute the agencies, and any other interested 210 of the Commission’s Rules of
clause ‘‘In support of their allegations in parties are encouraged to file written Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
the Complaint that the Gen 2 PT submissions on the issues of remedy, 210).
vehicles practice claims of the Asserted the public interest, and bonding.
Complainants and the IA are also By order of the Commission.
Utility Patents,’’ for the first clause of
Issued: October 7, 2015.
the last sentence on page 65 of the ID. requested to submit proposed remedial
See ID at 65–66. orders for the Commission’s Lisa R. Barton,
In connection with the final consideration. Complainants are further Secretary to the Commission.
disposition of this investigation, the requested to provide the expiration [FR Doc. 2015–26048 Filed 10–13–15; 8:45 am]
Commission may (1) issue an order that dates of each of the asserted patents and BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
could result in the exclusion of the copyright, and state the HTSUS
subject articles from entry into the subheadings under which the accused
United States, and/or (2) issue one or articles are imported. Complainants are
more cease and desist orders that could also requested to supply the names of DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
result in the respondent being required known importers of the infringing
to cease and desist from engaging in articles. The written submissions and Notice of Proposed Settlement
unfair acts in the importation and sale proposed remedial orders must be filed Agreement Under the Comprehensive
of such articles. Accordingly, the no later than the close of business on Environmental Response,
Commission is interested in receiving October 21, 2015. Reply submissions Compensation, and Liability Act
written submissions that address the must be filed no later than the close of
form of remedy, if any, that should be business on October 28, 2015. Such On September 30, 2015, a fully-
ordered. If a party seeks exclusion of an submissions should address the ALJ’s executed proposed Settlement
article from entry into the United States recommended determinations on Agreement was received by the
for purposes other than entry for remedy and bonding which were made Department of Justice, among the United
consumption, the party should so in Order No. 28. No further submissions
indicate and provide information States on behalf of the U.S. Department
on these issues will be permitted unless
establishing that activities involving of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
otherwise ordered by the Commission.
other types of entry either are adversely Persons filing written submissions Service (‘‘FWS’’), the State of Ohio, on
affecting it or are likely to do so. For must file the original document behalf of the Ohio Environmental
background, see In the Matter of Certain electronically on or before the deadlines Protection Agency (‘‘OEPA’’), and the
Devices for Connecting Computers via stated above and submit 8 true paper State of Ohio, on behalf of the Ohio
Telephone Lines, Inv. No. 337–TA–360, copies to the Office of the Secretary by Department of Transportation
USITC Pub. No. 2843 (Dec. 1994) noon the next day pursuant to section (‘‘ODOT’’).
(Commission Opinion). 210.4(f) of the Commission’s Rules of The Settlement Agreement resolves
If the Commission contemplates some Practice and Procedure (19 CFR certain claims by the FWS and OEPA for
form of remedy, it must consider the 210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to natural resource damages with respect
effects of that remedy upon the public the investigation number (‘‘Inv. No. to a portion of the Ottawa River,
interest. The factors the Commission 337–TA–935’’) in a prominent place on primarily located in Lucas County,
will consider include the effect that an the cover page and/or the first page. (See
exclusion order and/or cease and desist Ohio, against ODOT. The Settlement
Handbook for Electronic Filing
orders would have on (1) the public Procedures, http://www.usitc.gov/ Agreement requires ODOT to pay
health and welfare, (2) competitive secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/ $221,865 to the Department of the
conditions in the U.S. economy, (3) U.S. handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf). Interior’s Natural Resource Damage
production of articles that are like or Persons with questions regarding filing Assessment and Restoration Fund to be
directly competitive with those that are should contact the Secretary (202–205– used by the FWS and OEPA, the natural
subject to investigation, and (4) U.S. 2000). resource trustees (‘‘Trustees’’) for this
consumers. The Commission is Any person desiring to submit a matter, for the joint benefit and use of
therefore interested in receiving written document to the Commission in the Trustees to pay for Trustee-
submissions that address the confidence must request confidential sponsored natural resource restoration
aforementioned public interest factors treatment. All such requests should be efforts.
in the context of this investigation. directed to the Secretary to the The publication of this notice opens
If the Commission orders some form Commission and must include a full
a period for public comment on the
of remedy, the U.S. Trade statement of the reasons why the
Representative, as delegated by the proposed Settlement Agreement.
Commission should grant such
President, has 60 days to approve or treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents Comments should be addressed to the
disapprove the Commission’s action. for which confidential treatment by the Assistant Attorney General,
During this period, the subject articles Commission is properly sought will be Environment and Natural Resources
would be entitled to enter the United treated accordingly. A redacted non- Division, and should refer to United
States under bond, in an amount confidential version of the document States’ Settlement Agreement with State
determined by the Commission and must also be filed simultaneously with of Ohio Department of Transportation,
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
prescribed by the Secretary of the any confidential filing. All non- D.J. Ref. No. 90–11–3–09090/3. All
Treasury. The Commission is therefore confidential written submissions will be comments must be submitted no later
interested in receiving submissions available for public inspection at the than thirty (30) days after the
concerning the amount of the bond that Office of the Secretary and on EDIS. publication date of this notice.
should be imposed if a remedy is The authority for the Commission’s Comments may be submitted either by
ordered. determination is contained in section email or by mail:
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:39 Oct 13, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM 14OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_62040/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-27 08:50:06
Document Modified: 2018-02-27 08:50:06
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice. | |
| Contact | Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3115. Copies of non- confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http:// www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 61842 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR