80_FR_62212 80 FR 62013 - Fremont-Winema National Forest; Chiloquin Ranger District; Oregon: Lobert Restoration Project Environmental Impact Statement

80 FR 62013 - Fremont-Winema National Forest; Chiloquin Ranger District; Oregon: Lobert Restoration Project Environmental Impact Statement

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 199 (October 15, 2015)

Page Range62013-62014
FR Document2015-26288

The Forest Service will prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to disclose the environmental effects of commercial and non-commercial vegetation management activities, prescribed burning, road activities, recreation opportunity improvements, and other restoration activities. Other design criteria are included to protect resources and facilitate management activities. The project is located on the Chiloquin Ranger District, Fremont-Winema National Forest, Klamath County, Oregon.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 199 (Thursday, October 15, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 199 (Thursday, October 15, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62013-62014]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-26288]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Fremont-Winema National Forest; Chiloquin Ranger District; 
Oregon: Lobert Restoration Project Environmental Impact Statement

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Forest Service will prepare an Environmental Impact 
Statement (EIS) to disclose the environmental effects of commercial and 
non-commercial vegetation management activities, prescribed burning, 
road activities, recreation opportunity improvements, and other 
restoration activities. Other design criteria are included to protect 
resources and facilitate management activities. The project is located 
on the Chiloquin Ranger District, Fremont-Winema National Forest, 
Klamath County, Oregon.

DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received 
by November 16, 2015. The draft environmental impact statement is 
expected September 2016 and the final environmental impact statement is 
expected December 2016.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Constance Cummins, Forest 
Supervisor, Fremont-Winema National Forest, c/o Kelly Ware, 38500 
Highway 97 North, Chiloquin, OR 97624. Comments may also be sent via 
email to comments-pacificnorthwest-winema-chiloquin@fs.fed.us, or via 
facsimile to 541-783-2134.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kelly Ware, NEPA Planner, Chiloquin 
Ranger District, 38500 Highway 97 North, Chiloquin, OR 97624. Phone: 
541-783-4039. Email: kware@fs.fed.us.
    Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) 
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Lobert project area encompasses 
approximately 97,500 acres of National Forest System lands and is 
located within the Klamath Tribes' former 1954 reservation. The project 
lies within portions of the Sprague River, Hog Creek-Williamson River, 
Swan Lake Valley, Long Lake Valley-Upper Klamath Lake, Yonna Valley-
Lost River, and Wood River watersheds. The project area is in Klamath 
County, generally located between the communities of Fort Klamath and 
Chiloquin, south to Hagelstein Park, and east to Swan Lake Point and 
Saddle Mountain. The legal description for the project planning area 
includes Townships 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 South, and Ranges 07, 08, 09, 10 
East, Willamette Meridian, Klamath County, Oregon.

Purpose and Need for Action

    The purpose and need for the Lobert Restoration Project was 
developed by comparing the management objectives and desired conditions 
of the Winema Forest Plan to the existing conditions in the project 
planning area related to watershed and forest resiliency and function. 
Where plan information was not explicit, best available science and 
local research, including the Klamath Tribes' Management Plan, were 
utilized. Comparison of the existing and desired condition indicates 
the specific needs to: (1) Restore forest structure, composition, and 
density toward more resistance and resilient vegetative conditions 
given the historic fire regime by reducing the horizontal and vertical 
connectivity and density of standing

[[Page 62014]]

vegetation, surface fuels, and/or ladder fuels; (2) protect and release 
large and old trees from competition; (3) reduce uncharacteristic 
wildfire effects within the project planning area including the Saddle 
Mountain Cultural Resource Area and WUI; (4) Maintain and improve 
habitat for fish and wildlife species present in the project planning 
area, particularly mule deer; (5) restore degraded physical and 
biological stream processes that sustain floodplain ecosystem 
structure, function and diversity; (6) implement recovery plans for 
federally listed species; (7) reduce risk of northern spotted owl 
habitat degradation and loss from uncharacteristic wildfire and/or 
insect and disease outbreak; (8) conserve and restore cultural plants 
and maintain habitat for two rare endemic plant populations; (9) 
provide for a variety of social and cultural values and opportunities 
in the project area, including availability of traditional use plants, 
a variety of wood products, enhanced recreation experiences and 
opportunities, and a safe road system that moves toward current public 
access and resource management objectives.

Proposed Action

    The Forest proposed action includes restoration activities for the 
following resources: Vegetation management, aquatic restoration, 
recreation interpretive site improvement, and associated road 
management activities to address the purpose and need. These activities 
would occur over approximately the next 10 years.
    Vegetation management will include a mix of commercial thinning, 
small tree thinning, prescribed fire, and other fuels treatments. The 
use of different methods would be determined by site conditions, 
accessibility and specific resource protection needs. The proposal 
includes 9 different restoration treatments: (1) Dry ponderosa pine 
restoration; (2) dry mixed conifer restoration; (3) moist mixed conifer 
restoration; (4) xeric ponderosa pine restoration; (5) dispersal 
habitat for northern spotted owl (NSO); (6) foraging habitat (NSO); (7) 
wildland urban interface fuels reduction; (8) riparian restoration; (9) 
endemic plant enhancement.
    The proposed action will include large wood and spawning gravel 
placement in six stream reaches that are deficient in wood, riparian 
hardwood species planting, headcut repair, and spring enhancement. 
Spring enhancement may include: (1) Removal or repair of spring boxes 
or other spring development equipment; (2) installation of protective 
fencing; (3) vegetation treatments to improve hydrologic conditions (4) 
planting/sowing riparian species.
    Approximately 13.2 miles of roads are proposed to be closed post-
implementation, 162 miles of roads are proposed for decommissioning, 
and 4.5 miles of roads would have their operational maintenance levels 
upgraded.
    Recreation activities proposed include removal of three flush 
facilities from the Spring Creek Campground and picnic area and 
installation of one vault toilet. Two vault toilets that no longer meet 
water quality standards would be removed from the Oux Kanee Overlook; 
one would be replaced with a vault toilet that meets current standards.
    The Lobert Restoration Project will also include a variety of 
project design criteria that serve to mitigate impacts of activities to 
forest resources, including wildlife, soils, watershed condition, 
aquatic species, riparian habitat conservation areas, heritage 
resources, visuals, rangeland, botanical resources, and invasive 
plants. The proposed action may also include amendments to the Winema 
National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan, as amended.

Possible Alternatives

    The Forest Service will consider a range of alternatives. One of 
these will be the ``no action'' alternative in which none of the 
proposed action would be implemented. Additional alternatives may be 
included in response to issues raised by the public during the scoping 
process or due to additional concerns for resource values identified by 
the interdisciplinary team.

Responsible Official

    The Forest Supervisor of the Fremont-Winema National Forest, 1301 
South G Street, Lakeview, OR 97630, is the Responsible Official. As the 
Responsible Official, I will decide if the proposed action will be 
implemented. I will document the decision and rationale for the 
decision in the Record of Decision. I have delegated the responsibility 
for preparing the draft EIS and final EIS to the District Ranger, 
Chiloquin Ranger District.

Nature of Decision To Be Made

    Based on the purpose and need, the Responsible Official reviews the 
proposed action, the other alternatives, the environmental 
consequences, and public comments on the analysis in order to make the 
following decision: (1) Whether to implement timber harvest and 
associated fuels treatments, prescribed burning, and watershed work, 
including the design features and potential mitigation measures to 
protect resources; and if so, how much and at what specific locations; 
(2) What, if any, specific project monitoring requirements are needed 
to assure design features and potential mitigation measures are 
implemented and effective, and to evaluate the success of the project 
objectives. A project specific monitoring plan will be developed.

Scoping Process

    This notice of intent initiates the scoping process, which guides 
the development of the environmental impact statement. The 
interdisciplinary team will continue to seek information, comments, and 
assistance from Federal, State, and local agencies, Tribal governments, 
and other individuals or organizations that may be interested in, or 
affected by, the proposed action.
    It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times 
and in such manner that they are useful to the agency's preparation of 
the environmental impact statement. Therefore, comments should be 
provided prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly 
articulate the reviewer's concerns and contentions.
    Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names 
and addresses of those who comment, will be part of the public record 
for this proposed action. Comments submitted anonymously will be 
accepted and considered.

    Dated: October 1, 2015.
Constance Cummins,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2015-26288 Filed 10-14-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P



                                                                                  Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 199 / Thursday, October 15, 2015 / Notices                                                     62013

                                                  approval. All comments will be a matter                        information needed to complete this                           are 110,136. This includes 55,068
                                                  of public record.                                              form is obtained from the SNAP case                           sampled active cases for QC review and
                                                  FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                               record and state quality control                              the same 55,068 records being kept by
                                                  Requests for additional information or                         findings. The information is used to                          the 53 State agencies.
                                                  copies of this information collection                          monitor and reduce errors, develop                              Estimated Time per Response: The
                                                  should be directed to Stephanie Proska                         policy strategies and analyze household
                                                                                                                                                                               estimated time of response for State
                                                  at 703–305–2437.                                               characteristic data. We estimate that it
                                                                                                                                                                               agencies to report is approximately
                                                  SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                                     takes 1.05 hours per response and .0236
                                                                                                                 hours per record for recordkeeping to                         63.36 minutes and the estimated
                                                     Title: Quality Control Review
                                                                                                                 complete the form.                                            response time for State agencies to do
                                                  Schedule.
                                                     Form Number: FNS 380–1.                                        Affected Public: State, Local and                          recordkeeping is approximately 1.42
                                                     OMB Number: 0584–0299.                                      Tribal Government: Respondent groups                          minutes. Therefore, the total time per
                                                     Expiration Date: February 29, 2016.                         identified include: 53 State agencies.                        response is approximately 64.78
                                                     Type of Request: Revision of a                                 Estimated Number of Responses per                          minutes.
                                                  currently approved collection.                                 Respondent: The total estimated number                          Estimated Total Annual Burden on
                                                     Abstract: Form FNS 380–1 is the                             of responses per respondent is 1,039.02.                      Respondents: 3,567,055.8 minutes
                                                  Supplemental Nutrition Assistance                                 Estimated Frequency per Respondent:                        (59,450.93 hours). See the table below
                                                  Program’s (SNAP) Quality Control (QC)                          1.9980769.                                                    for estimated total annual burden for
                                                  Review Schedule which collects QC and                             Estimated Total Annual Responses:
                                                                                                                                                                               each type of respondent.
                                                  household characteristics data. The                            The estimated total annual responses

                                                                                                               REPORTING AND RECORDKEEPING BURDEN
                                                                                                                                                                                               Estimated
                                                                                                                               Estimated          Responses                 Total annual        average      Estimated
                                                                              Respondent                                        number            annually per               responses         number of     total hours
                                                                                                                              respondents         respondent                  (col. bxc)       hours per      (col. dxe)
                                                                                                                                                                                               response

                                                  State Agencies Reporting ................................................               53               1,039.02                55,068            1.056     58,151.87
                                                  State Agencies Recordkeeping .......................................                    53               1,039.02                55,068           0.0236      1,299.60

                                                       Total Reporting Burden ............................................              106      ........................         110,136           1.0796     59,450.93



                                                   Dated: October 2, 2015.                                       DATES:  Comments concerning the scope                         Creek-Williamson River, Swan Lake
                                                  Audrey Rowe,                                                   of the analysis must be received by                           Valley, Long Lake Valley-Upper
                                                  Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.                     November 16, 2015. The draft                                  Klamath Lake, Yonna Valley-Lost River,
                                                  [FR Doc. 2015–26292 Filed 10–14–15; 8:45 am]                   environmental impact statement is                             and Wood River watersheds. The project
                                                  BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
                                                                                                                 expected September 2016 and the final                         area is in Klamath County, generally
                                                                                                                 environmental impact statement is                             located between the communities of
                                                                                                                 expected December 2016.                                       Fort Klamath and Chiloquin, south to
                                                  DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE                                      ADDRESSES: Send written comments to                           Hagelstein Park, and east to Swan Lake
                                                                                                                 Constance Cummins, Forest Supervisor,                         Point and Saddle Mountain. The legal
                                                  Forest Service                                                 Fremont-Winema National Forest, c/o                           description for the project planning area
                                                                                                                 Kelly Ware, 38500 Highway 97 North,                           includes Townships 33, 34, 35, 36, 37
                                                  Fremont-Winema National Forest;                                                                                              South, and Ranges 07, 08, 09, 10 East,
                                                                                                                 Chiloquin, OR 97624. Comments may
                                                  Chiloquin Ranger District; Oregon:                                                                                           Willamette Meridian, Klamath County,
                                                                                                                 also be sent via email to comments-
                                                  Lobert Restoration Project                                                                                                   Oregon.
                                                                                                                 pacificnorthwest-winema-chiloquin@
                                                  Environmental Impact Statement
                                                                                                                 fs.fed.us, or via facsimile to 541–783–                       Purpose and Need for Action
                                                  AGENCY:     Forest Service, USDA.                              2134.
                                                                                                                                                                                 The purpose and need for the Lobert
                                                  ACTION:Notice of intent to prepare an                          FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                              Restoration Project was developed by
                                                  environmental impact statement.                                Kelly Ware, NEPA Planner, Chiloquin                           comparing the management objectives
                                                                                                                 Ranger District, 38500 Highway 97                             and desired conditions of the Winema
                                                  SUMMARY:    The Forest Service will                            North, Chiloquin, OR 97624. Phone:                            Forest Plan to the existing conditions in
                                                  prepare an Environmental Impact                                541–783–4039. Email: kware@fs.fed.us.                         the project planning area related to
                                                  Statement (EIS) to disclose the                                   Individuals who use                                        watershed and forest resiliency and
                                                  environmental effects of commercial                            telecommunication devices for the deaf                        function. Where plan information was
                                                  and non-commercial vegetation                                  (TDD) may call the Federal Information                        not explicit, best available science and
                                                  management activities, prescribed                              Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339                        local research, including the Klamath
                                                  burning, road activities, recreation                           between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern                            Tribes’ Management Plan, were utilized.
                                                                                                                 Time, Monday through Friday.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                  opportunity improvements, and other                                                                                          Comparison of the existing and desired
                                                  restoration activities. Other design                           SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The                                condition indicates the specific needs
                                                  criteria are included to protect resources                     Lobert project area encompasses                               to: (1) Restore forest structure,
                                                  and facilitate management activities.                          approximately 97,500 acres of National                        composition, and density toward more
                                                  The project is located on the Chiloquin                        Forest System lands and is located                            resistance and resilient vegetative
                                                  Ranger District, Fremont-Winema                                within the Klamath Tribes’ former 1954                        conditions given the historic fire regime
                                                  National Forest, Klamath County,                               reservation. The project lies within                          by reducing the horizontal and vertical
                                                  Oregon.                                                        portions of the Sprague River, Hog                            connectivity and density of standing


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014     17:19 Oct 14, 2015     Jkt 238001    PO 00000     Frm 00002   Fmt 4703    Sfmt 4703      E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM     15OCN1


                                                  62014                       Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 199 / Thursday, October 15, 2015 / Notices

                                                  vegetation, surface fuels, and/or ladder                conditions (4) planting/sowing riparian               potential mitigation measures to protect
                                                  fuels; (2) protect and release large and                species.                                              resources; and if so, how much and at
                                                  old trees from competition; (3) reduce                    Approximately 13.2 miles of roads are               what specific locations; (2) What, if any,
                                                  uncharacteristic wildfire effects within                proposed to be closed post-                           specific project monitoring
                                                  the project planning area including the                 implementation, 162 miles of roads are                requirements are needed to assure
                                                  Saddle Mountain Cultural Resource                       proposed for decommissioning, and 4.5                 design features and potential mitigation
                                                  Area and WUI; (4) Maintain and                          miles of roads would have their                       measures are implemented and
                                                  improve habitat for fish and wildlife                   operational maintenance levels                        effective, and to evaluate the success of
                                                  species present in the project planning                 upgraded.                                             the project objectives. A project specific
                                                  area, particularly mule deer; (5) restore                 Recreation activities proposed include              monitoring plan will be developed.
                                                  degraded physical and biological stream                 removal of three flush facilities from the
                                                  processes that sustain floodplain                       Spring Creek Campground and picnic                    Scoping Process
                                                  ecosystem structure, function and                       area and installation of one vault toilet.              This notice of intent initiates the
                                                  diversity; (6) implement recovery plans                 Two vault toilets that no longer meet                 scoping process, which guides the
                                                  for federally listed species; (7) reduce                water quality standards would be                      development of the environmental
                                                  risk of northern spotted owl habitat                    removed from the Oux Kanee Overlook;                  impact statement. The interdisciplinary
                                                  degradation and loss from                               one would be replaced with a vault                    team will continue to seek information,
                                                  uncharacteristic wildfire and/or insect                 toilet that meets current standards.                  comments, and assistance from Federal,
                                                  and disease outbreak; (8) conserve and                    The Lobert Restoration Project will                 State, and local agencies, Tribal
                                                  restore cultural plants and maintain                    also include a variety of project design              governments, and other individuals or
                                                  habitat for two rare endemic plant                      criteria that serve to mitigate impacts of            organizations that may be interested in,
                                                  populations; (9) provide for a variety of               activities to forest resources, including             or affected by, the proposed action.
                                                  social and cultural values and                          wildlife, soils, watershed condition,                   It is important that reviewers provide
                                                  opportunities in the project area,                      aquatic species, riparian habitat                     their comments at such times and in
                                                  including availability of traditional use               conservation areas, heritage resources,               such manner that they are useful to the
                                                  plants, a variety of wood products,                     visuals, rangeland, botanical resources,              agency’s preparation of the
                                                  enhanced recreation experiences and                     and invasive plants. The proposed                     environmental impact statement.
                                                  opportunities, and a safe road system                   action may also include amendments to                 Therefore, comments should be
                                                  that moves toward current public access                 the Winema National Forest Land and                   provided prior to the close of the
                                                  and resource management objectives.                     Resource Management Plan, as                          comment period and should clearly
                                                                                                          amended.                                              articulate the reviewer’s concerns and
                                                  Proposed Action
                                                                                                                                                                contentions.
                                                     The Forest proposed action includes                  Possible Alternatives                                   Comments received in response to
                                                  restoration activities for the following                  The Forest Service will consider a                  this solicitation, including names and
                                                  resources: Vegetation management,                       range of alternatives. One of these will              addresses of those who comment, will
                                                  aquatic restoration, recreation                         be the ‘‘no action’’ alternative in which             be part of the public record for this
                                                  interpretive site improvement, and                      none of the proposed action would be                  proposed action. Comments submitted
                                                  associated road management activities                   implemented. Additional alternatives                  anonymously will be accepted and
                                                  to address the purpose and need. These                  may be included in response to issues                 considered.
                                                  activities would occur over                             raised by the public during the scoping                 Dated: October 1, 2015.
                                                  approximately the next 10 years.                        process or due to additional concerns
                                                     Vegetation management will include a                                                                       Constance Cummins,
                                                                                                          for resource values identified by the
                                                  mix of commercial thinning, small tree                                                                        Forest Supervisor.
                                                                                                          interdisciplinary team.
                                                  thinning, prescribed fire, and other fuels                                                                    [FR Doc. 2015–26288 Filed 10–14–15; 8:45 am]
                                                  treatments. The use of different methods                Responsible Official                                  BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
                                                  would be determined by site conditions,                    The Forest Supervisor of the Fremont-
                                                  accessibility and specific resource                     Winema National Forest, 1301 South G
                                                  protection needs. The proposal includes                 Street, Lakeview, OR 97630, is the                    CHEMICAL SAFETY AND HAZARD
                                                  9 different restoration treatments: (1)                 Responsible Official. As the Responsible              INVESTIGATION BOARD
                                                  Dry ponderosa pine restoration; (2) dry                 Official, I will decide if the proposed
                                                  mixed conifer restoration; (3) moist                    action will be implemented. I will                    Sunshine Act Meeting
                                                  mixed conifer restoration; (4) xeric                    document the decision and rationale for
                                                  ponderosa pine restoration; (5) dispersal                                                                     TIME AND DATE:    October 21, 2015, 1 p.m.
                                                                                                          the decision in the Record of Decision.
                                                  habitat for northern spotted owl (NSO);                                                                       EDT.
                                                                                                          I have delegated the responsibility for
                                                  (6) foraging habitat (NSO); (7) wildland                preparing the draft EIS and final EIS to              PLACE:  Palomar Hotel, 2121 P St. NW.,
                                                  urban interface fuels reduction; (8)                    the District Ranger, Chiloquin Ranger                 Phillips Ballroom, Washington, DC
                                                  riparian restoration; (9) endemic plant                 District.                                             20037.
                                                  enhancement.                                                                                                  STATUS: Open to the public.
                                                     The proposed action will include                     Nature of Decision To Be Made                         MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The
                                                  large wood and spawning gravel                            Based on the purpose and need, the                  Chemical Safety and Hazard
                                                  placement in six stream reaches that are                Responsible Official reviews the                      Investigation Board (CSB) will convene
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                  deficient in wood, riparian hardwood                    proposed action, the other alternatives,              a public meeting on October 21, 2015,
                                                  species planting, headcut repair, and                   the environmental consequences, and                   starting at 1 p.m. EDT in Washington,
                                                  spring enhancement. Spring                              public comments on the analysis in                    DC at the Palomar Hotel, 2121 P St.
                                                  enhancement may include: (1) Removal                    order to make the following decision: (1)             NW., in the Phillips Ballroom. The
                                                  or repair of spring boxes or other spring               Whether to implement timber harvest                   Board will discuss the final report and
                                                  development equipment; (2) installation                 and associated fuels treatments,                      recommendations on the Caribbean
                                                  of protective fencing; (3) vegetation                   prescribed burning, and watershed                     Petroleum incident. The Board may
                                                  treatments to improve hydrologic                        work, including the design features and               then vote on the Caribbean Petroleum


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:19 Oct 14, 2015   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00003   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM   15OCN1



Document Created: 2018-02-27 08:52:36
Document Modified: 2018-02-27 08:52:36
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
DatesComments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received by November 16, 2015. The draft environmental impact statement is expected September 2016 and the final environmental impact statement is expected December 2016.
ContactKelly Ware, NEPA Planner, Chiloquin Ranger District, 38500 Highway 97 North, Chiloquin, OR 97624. Phone: 541-783-4039. Email: [email protected]
FR Citation80 FR 62013 

2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR