80_FR_62341 80 FR 62142 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Adopt an Issuer Incentive Program Applicable to Securities Listed on BATS Exchange, Inc.

80 FR 62142 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Adopt an Issuer Incentive Program Applicable to Securities Listed on BATS Exchange, Inc.

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 199 (October 15, 2015)

Page Range62142-62145
FR Document2015-26150

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 199 (Thursday, October 15, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 199 (Thursday, October 15, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62142-62145]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-26150]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-76113; File No. SR-BATS-2015-80]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS Exchange, Inc.; Notice of 
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Adopt 
an Issuer Incentive Program Applicable to Securities Listed on BATS 
Exchange, Inc.

October 8, 2015.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given 
that on September 30, 2015, BATS Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or 
``BATS'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II 
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The 
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the 
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange filed a proposal to amend the fees applicable to 
securities listed on the Exchange, which are set forth in BATS Rule 
14.13.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's 
Web site at www.batstrading.com, at the principal office of the 
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    On August 30, 2011, the Exchange received approval of rules 
applicable to the qualification, listing, and delisting of companies on 
the Exchange,\3\ which it modified on February 8, 2012 in order to 
adopt pricing for the listing of exchange traded products (``ETPs'') 
\4\ on the Exchange,\5\ which it subsequently modified again on June 4, 
2014.\6\ On October 16, 2014, the Exchange modified Rule 14.13, 
entitled ``Company Listing Fees'' to eliminate the annual fees for ETPs 
not participating in the Exchange's Competitive Liquidity

[[Page 62143]]

Provider Program pursuant to Rule 11.8, Interpretation and Policy .02 
(the ``CLP Program'').\7\ On May 22, 2015, the Exchange further 
modified Rule 14.13 to eliminate the $5,000 application fee for ETPs, 
effectively eliminating any compulsory fees for both new ETP issues and 
transfer listings in ETPs on the Exchange.\8\ The Exchange is now 
proposing to offer an incentive payment to ETPs that are listed on the 
Exchange based on the consolidated average daily volume (the ``CADV'') 
of the ETP (the ``Issuer Incentive Program''). The Exchange notes that 
the payments would be made payable to the ETP or fund, and not to the 
sponsor of the ETP.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65225 (August 30, 
2011), 76 FR 55148 (September 6, 2011) (SR-BATS-2011-018).
    \4\ As defined in BATS Rule 11.8(e)(1)(A), the term ``ETP'' 
means any security listed pursuant to Exchange Rule 14.11.
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66422 (February 17, 
2012), 77 FR 11179 (February 24, 2012) (SR-BATS-2012-010).
    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 72377 (June 12, 
2014), 79 FR 34822 (June 18, 2014) (SR-BATS-2014-024).
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 73414 (October 23, 
2014), 79 FR 64434 (October 29, 2014) (SR-BATS-2014-050).
    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75085 (June 1, 
2015), 80 FR 32190 (June 5, 2015) (SR-BATS-2015-39).
    \9\ The sponsor of an ETP is the registered investment adviser 
that provides investment management services to such ETP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Specifically, the Exchange is proposing that the Issuer Incentive 
Program would allow the Exchange to provide payments to the fund on a 
quarterly basis that would be based on the CADV of the ETP for each 
trading day of the preceding calendar quarter that the ETP was listed 
on the Exchange, as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Annualized
                         CADV Range                             payment
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1,000,000-3,000,000 shares..................................      $3,000
3,000,001-5,000,000 shares..................................      10,000
5,000,001-10,000,000 shares.................................      50,000
10,000,001-20,000,000 shares................................     100,000
20,000,001-35,000,000 shares................................     250,000
Greater than 35,000,000 shares..............................     400,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Because the payments would be provided for each trading day, where 
an ETP had a CADV of 4,000,000 over the course of a full calendar 
quarter that it was listed on the Exchange, the ETP would receive a 
payment of $2,500 (.25 * $10,000, the annualized payment for that CADV) 
for the quarter. Where the same ETP had a CADV of 4,000,000, but was 
only listed on the Exchange for exactly half of the trading days in the 
calendar quarter, the ETP would receive a payment of $1,250 ((.25 * 
$10,000) * .5).
    The Exchange is proposing the Issuer Incentive Program as a way to 
attract both new ETP issues and transfer ETP listings to the Exchange. 
The Exchange notes that the Issuer Incentive Program would also be 
applicable to ETPs currently listed on the Exchange. Traditionally, ETP 
issuers have paid between $5,000 and $55,000 on an annual basis in 
order to be listed on an exchange,\10\ a paradigm only recently broken 
by BATS implementing free ETP listings on the Exchange, as described 
above. If the only revenue source associated with listing these ETPs 
was the listing fee, the pay-per-listing model would make sense, 
however, the primary listing exchange also earns additional revenue 
from trading fees. Such additional trading fees are earned by exchanges 
from the outsized share of intraday trading volume that a primary 
listed security typically garners for the listing exchange as well as 
trading fees for orders participating in the opening and closing 
auctions. As the CADV increases for an ETP, so does the additional 
trading fee revenue earned by the primary listing exchange. As such, 
the Exchange is proposing to adopt the above described tiered payment 
structure for ETPs listed on the Exchange, which it believes creates a 
more equitable and appropriate relationship between the Exchange and 
issuers based on the revenue and expenses associated with listing ETPs 
on the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See, e.g., NYSE Arca Equities Schedule of Fees and Charges 
for Exchange Listing Services, available at: https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/listing/nyse_arca_e_listing_fees.pdf; see also 
NASDAQ Rules 5930 and 5940.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition to the proposed changes described above, the Exchange 
proposes to eliminate reference to fees for securities participating in 
the CLP Program because such program is no longer operational and has 
been replaced by the Supplemental Competitive Liquidity Provider 
Program, as described in Rule 11.8, Interpretation and Policy .03 (the 
``ETP CLP Program'').
    The Exchange proposes to implement the amendments to Rule 
14.13(b)(2)(C) effective October 1, 2015.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations 
thereunder that are applicable to a national securities exchange, and, 
in particular, with the requirements of Section 6 of the Act.\11\ 
Specifically, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is 
consistent with Section 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\12\ in that it 
provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and 
other charges among issuers and it does not unfairly discriminate 
between customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed amendment to the annual 
listing fees in Rule 14.13(b)(2)(C) to provide payment to ETPs listed 
on the Exchange is a reasonable, fair and equitable, and not unfairly 
discriminatory allocation of fees and other charges because it would 
create a distribution of fees and other charges applicable to all 
issuers that reflect the additional revenue that an ETP listed on the 
Exchange creates for the Exchange through executions occurring in the 
auctions and additional shares executed on the Exchange. As the market 
is currently structured, ETPs typically pay a flat fee to an exchange 
for listing services regardless of the amount of additional revenue 
that the product will bring to the exchange. The Issuer Incentive 
Program, on the other hand, acknowledges the additional revenue brought 
to the Exchange by virtue of an ETP listing on the Exchange and is 
designed to reward the issuer of an ETP for such additional revenue, 
which the Exchange believes creates a more equitable and appropriate 
relationship between the Exchange and issuers based on the revenue and 
expenses associated with listing ETPs on the Exchange. As such, the 
Exchange believes that that it is reasonable, fair and equitable, and 
not unfairly discriminatory allocation of fees and other charges to 
provide payment to issuers of ETPs listed on the Exchange.
    Similarly, the Exchange believes that the proposed amendment to the 
annual listing fees in Rule 14.13(b)(2)(C) to provide tiered payments 
to issuers of ETPs listed on the Exchange based on the CADV of an ETP 
is a reasonable, fair and equitable, and not unfairly discriminatory 
allocation of fees and other charges because it would create a 
distribution of fees and other charges applicable to all issuers that 
are commensurate with the additional revenue that an ETP listed on the 
Exchange creates for the Exchange through executions occurring in the 
auctions and additional shares executed on the Exchange. As described 
above, where the CADV of an ETP increases, so does the additional 
trading fee revenue earned by the primary listing exchange. 
Accordingly, the tiers within the Issuer Incentive Program are designed 
to reward the issuer of an ETP on the basis of the additional revenue 
potential that the ETP brings to the Exchange. Further to this point, 
the Exchange does not believe that the proposal is unfairly 
discriminatory because, as described above, the annualized payments 
associated with the various CADV tiers in the Issuer Incentive Program 
are designed to account for the approximate additional revenue that the 
Exchange

[[Page 62144]]

will receive from an ETP listed on the Exchange within a particular 
CADV tier. The Exchange notes that certain ETPs in the proposed tiers 
with higher CADV would receive disproportionately higher rebates than 
ETPs in other tiers with lower CADV. The Exchange believes it is 
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory to provide a 
disproportionately higher payment to ETPs in higher tiers because such 
ETPs would likely bring a disproportionately larger amount of revenue 
to the Exchange from the auctions the Exchange would conduct for such 
securities and increased trading activity on the Exchange in such 
securities. The Exchange believes that the additional revenue it will 
generate from ETPs that receive payments through the Issuer Incentive 
Program, including ETPs that qualify for the higher tiers, will exceed 
the amount of such payments. To the extent the additional revenue 
generated by ETPs that receive payments through the Issuer Incentive 
Program does not exceed the amount of such payments, the Exchange will 
modify the structure of the Issuer Incentive Program such that the 
program does generate revenue for the Exchange.
    In addition, the Exchange does not believe that it is unfairly 
discriminatory to exclude ETPs with a CADV of less than 1,000,000 from 
the Issuer Incentive Program because such ETPs do not typically 
generate revenue to the same degree as the higher CADV products. The 
Exchange notes that ETPs with a CADV of less than 1,000,000 are 
eligible to participate in the ETP CLP Program, which is designed to 
incent market makers to provide liquidity in less actively traded 
products with the goal of facilitating the growth of such products.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ Pursuant to Rule 11.8, Interpretation and Policy .03(n), a 
security participating in the ETP CLP Program will no longer be 
eligible to participate once such security sustains CADV of 
1,000,000 shares or more for three consecutive months.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposal creates a more equitable 
and appropriate relationship between the Exchange and issuers tied 
directly to the revenue and expenses associated with listing ETPs on 
the Exchange. As such, the Exchange believes that that it is 
reasonable, fair and equitable, and not unfairly discriminatory 
allocation of fees and other charges to offer payments to issuers of 
ETPs listed on the Exchange that are tiered on the basis of the CADV of 
the ETP.
    The Exchange is not currently proposing to extend the Issuer 
Incentive Program to corporate securities despite the fact that it 
currently maintains rules and fees necessary to support the listing of 
a corporate security on the Exchange.\14\ The Exchange believes it is 
reasonable and equitable to limit the Issuer Incentive Program to ETPs 
and not to extend such proposal to corporate listings because the 
economic structure of operating a listings program for ETPs is 
significantly different than operating a listings program for 
corporates. A primary distinction between ETPs and corporate listings 
is that the regulation and oversight of ETPs is scalable, such that 
while each new ETP requires surveillance and results in additional 
regulatory burden on the Exchange, such burden is rarely related to the 
governance structure of the fund as many funds are often issued through 
the same governance structure (e.g., a trust). In contrast, each 
corporate issuance is typically distinct from any other issuance, and 
thus, the regulatory burden does not as easily scale as the number of 
listings increases. In addition, corporate listings often demand 
additional oversight with respect to governance and services that are 
typically not provided for ETPs, including investor relations services, 
public relations, sales and marketing. These services often demand a 
large capital commitment from the listings exchange. Thus, while the 
Exchange believes that it can adopt a competitive and profitable 
program for ETPs that includes the Issuer Incentive Program as 
proposed, the Exchange would have to further analyze whether such a 
program could be applied to corporate securities and remain profitable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ The Exchange notes that it does not currently list any 
corporate securities and would consider applicable fees and 
incentives in the future if the Exchange is to list one or more 
corporate securities, particularly if the Exchange was seeking to 
operate a competitive corporate listing business. To the extent the 
Exchange did propose to extend the Issuer Incentive Program to 
corporate securities it would file a separate proposal pursuant to 
Section 19(b)(1) of the Act and Rule 19b-4 thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Based on the foregoing, the Exchange believes that the proposed 
amendment to Rule 14.13(b)(2)(C) to implement the Issuer Incentive 
Program is a reasonable, equitable, and non-discriminatory allocation 
of fees to issuers.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or 
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended. With 
respect to the proposed new pricing for the listing of ETPs, the 
Exchange does not believe that the changes burden competition, but 
instead, enhance competition, as it is intended to increase the 
competitiveness of the Exchange's listings program by allowing the 
Exchange to provide ETPs with quarterly payments based on the CADV of 
the ETP, which the Exchange believes will be directly related to the 
amount of additional revenue that the Exchange receives from additional 
transactions in the ETP. As such, the proposal is a competitive 
proposal that is intended to attract additional ETP listings, which 
will, in turn, benefit the Exchange and all other BATS-listed ETPs.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit, 
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received 
any written comments from members or other interested parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \15\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 
thereunder.\16\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of the 
proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend 
such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is 
necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of 
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \16\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposal is 
consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the 
following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File No. SR-BATS-2015-80 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File No. SR-BATS-2015-80. This file 
number should be included on the subject line

[[Page 62145]]

if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your 
comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission 
will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent 
amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule 
change that are filed with the Commission, and all written 
communications relating to the proposed rule change between the 
Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from 
the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be 
available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public 
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official 
business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of 
such filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the 
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted 
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying 
information from submissions. You should submit only information that 
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to 
File No. SR-BATS-2015-80 and should be submitted on or before November 
5, 2015.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-26150 Filed 10-14-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P



                                                  62142                       Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 199 / Thursday, October 15, 2015 / Notices

                                                  C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s                       only one method. The Commission will                  Items I, II and III below, which Items
                                                  Statement on Comments on the                            post all comments on the Commission’s                 have been prepared by the Exchange.
                                                  Proposed Rule Change Received From                      Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/                The Commission is publishing this
                                                  Members, Participants, or Others                        rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the                       notice to solicit comments on the
                                                    The Exchange neither solicited nor                    submission, all subsequent                            proposed rule change from interested
                                                  received written comments on the                        amendments, all written statements                    persons.
                                                  proposed rule change.                                   with respect to the proposed rule
                                                                                                          change that are filed with the                        I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
                                                  III. Date of Effectiveness of the                       Commission, and all written                           Statement of the Terms of Substance of
                                                  Proposed Rule Change and Timing for                     communications relating to the                        the Proposed Rule Change
                                                  Commission Action                                       proposed rule change between the                         The Exchange filed a proposal to
                                                     Because the foregoing proposed rule                  Commission and any person, other than                 amend the fees applicable to securities
                                                  change does not:                                        those that may be withheld from the                   listed on the Exchange, which are set
                                                     A. Significantly affect the protection               public in accordance with the                         forth in BATS Rule 14.13.
                                                  of investors or the public interest;                    provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be                      The text of the proposed rule change
                                                     B. impose any significant burden on                  available for Web site viewing and                    is available at the Exchange’s Web site
                                                  competition; and                                        printing in the Commission’s Public                   at www.batstrading.com, at the
                                                     C. become operative for 30 days from                 Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,                     principal office of the Exchange, and at
                                                  the date on which it was filed, or such                 Washington, DC 20549 on official                      the Commission’s Public Reference
                                                  shorter time as the Commission may                      business days between the hours of                    Room.
                                                  designate, it has become effective                      10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
                                                                                                          filing also will be available for                     II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
                                                  pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the
                                                                                                          inspection and copying at the principal               Statement of the Purpose of, and
                                                  Act 33 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 34
                                                                                                          office of the Exchange. All comments                  Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
                                                  thereunder. At any time within 60 days
                                                                                                          received will be posted without change;               Change
                                                  of the filing of the proposed rule change,
                                                  the Commission summarily may                            the Commission does not edit personal                   In its filing with the Commission, the
                                                  temporarily suspend such rule change if                 identifying information from                          Exchange included statements
                                                  it appears to the Commission that such                  submissions. You should submit only                   concerning the purpose of and basis for
                                                  action is necessary or appropriate in the               information that you wish to make                     the proposed rule change and discussed
                                                  public interest, for the protection of                  available publicly. All submissions                   any comments it received on the
                                                  investors, or otherwise in furtherance of               should refer to File Number SR–CBOE–                  proposed rule change. The text of these
                                                  the purposes of the Act. If the                         2015–084 and should be submitted on                   statements may be examined at the
                                                  Commission takes such action, the                       or before November 5, 2015.                           places specified in Item IV below. The
                                                  Commission will institute proceedings                     For the Commission, by the Division of              Exchange has prepared summaries, set
                                                  to determine whether the proposed rule                  Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated            forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
                                                  change should be approved or                            authority.35                                          the most significant parts of such
                                                  disapproved.                                            Robert W. Errett,                                     statements.
                                                                                                          Deputy Secretary.
                                                  IV. Solicitation of Comments                                                                                  A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
                                                                                                          [FR Doc. 2015–26155 Filed 10–14–15; 8:45 am]          Statement of the Purpose of, and
                                                    Interested persons are invited to
                                                  submit written data, views, and
                                                                                                          BILLING CODE 8011–01–P                                Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
                                                  arguments concerning the foregoing,                                                                           Change
                                                  including whether the proposed rule                     SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE                               1. Purpose
                                                  change is consistent with the Act.                      COMMISSION                                               On August 30, 2011, the Exchange
                                                  Comments may be submitted by any of
                                                                                                          [Release No. 34–76113; File No. SR–BATS–              received approval of rules applicable to
                                                  the following methods:
                                                                                                          2015–80]                                              the qualification, listing, and delisting
                                                  Electronic Comments                                                                                           of companies on the Exchange,3 which
                                                                                                          Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS                   it modified on February 8, 2012 in order
                                                    • Use the Commission’s Internet
                                                                                                          Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and                  to adopt pricing for the listing of
                                                  comment form (http://www.sec.gov/                       Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
                                                  rules/sro.shtml); or                                                                                          exchange traded products (‘‘ETPs’’) 4 on
                                                                                                          Rule Change To Adopt an Issuer
                                                    • Send an email to rule-comments@                                                                           the Exchange,5 which it subsequently
                                                                                                          Incentive Program Applicable to                       modified again on June 4, 2014.6 On
                                                  sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
                                                                                                          Securities Listed on BATS Exchange,                   October 16, 2014, the Exchange
                                                  CBOE–2015–084 on the subject line.
                                                                                                          Inc.                                                  modified Rule 14.13, entitled ‘‘Company
                                                  Paper Comments                                                                                                Listing Fees’’ to eliminate the annual
                                                                                                          October 8, 2015.
                                                    • Send paper comments in triplicate                      Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the                fees for ETPs not participating in the
                                                  to Secretary, Securities and Exchange                   Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the                  Exchange’s Competitive Liquidity
                                                  Commission, 100 F Street NE.,                           ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
                                                  Washington, DC 20549–1090.                              notice is hereby given that on
                                                                                                                                                                   3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65225

                                                                                                                                                                (August 30, 2011), 76 FR 55148 (September 6, 2011)
                                                  All submissions should refer to File                    September 30, 2015, BATS Exchange,                    (SR–BATS–2011–018).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                  Number SR–CBOE–2015–084. This file                      Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BATS’’) filed                4 As defined in BATS Rule 11.8(e)(1)(A), the term

                                                  number should be included on the                        with the Securities and Exchange                      ‘‘ETP’’ means any security listed pursuant to
                                                  subject line if email is used. To help the              Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the                       Exchange Rule 14.11.
                                                                                                                                                                   5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66422
                                                  Commission process and review your                      proposed rule change as described in                  (February 17, 2012), 77 FR 11179 (February 24,
                                                  comments more efficiently, please use                                                                         2012) (SR–BATS–2012–010).
                                                                                                            35 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).                             6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 72377
                                                    33 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).                              1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).                              (June 12, 2014), 79 FR 34822 (June 18, 2014) (SR–
                                                    34 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).                              2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.                                 BATS–2014–024).



                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:19 Oct 14, 2015   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00131   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM   15OCN1


                                                                                Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 199 / Thursday, October 15, 2015 / Notices                                           62143

                                                  Provider Program pursuant to Rule 11.8,                    exchange,10 a paradigm only recently                  listing fees in Rule 14.13(b)(2)(C) to
                                                  Interpretation and Policy .02 (the ‘‘CLP                   broken by BATS implementing free ETP                  provide payment to ETPs listed on the
                                                  Program’’).7 On May 22, 2015, the                          listings on the Exchange, as described                Exchange is a reasonable, fair and
                                                  Exchange further modified Rule 14.13 to                    above. If the only revenue source                     equitable, and not unfairly
                                                  eliminate the $5,000 application fee for                   associated with listing these ETPs was                discriminatory allocation of fees and
                                                  ETPs, effectively eliminating any                          the listing fee, the pay-per-listing model            other charges because it would create a
                                                  compulsory fees for both new ETP                           would make sense, however, the                        distribution of fees and other charges
                                                  issues and transfer listings in ETPs on                    primary listing exchange also earns                   applicable to all issuers that reflect the
                                                  the Exchange.8 The Exchange is now                         additional revenue from trading fees.                 additional revenue that an ETP listed on
                                                  proposing to offer an incentive payment                    Such additional trading fees are earned               the Exchange creates for the Exchange
                                                  to ETPs that are listed on the Exchange                    by exchanges from the outsized share of               through executions occurring in the
                                                  based on the consolidated average daily                    intraday trading volume that a primary                auctions and additional shares executed
                                                  volume (the ‘‘CADV’’) of the ETP (the                      listed security typically garners for the             on the Exchange. As the market is
                                                  ‘‘Issuer Incentive Program’’). The                         listing exchange as well as trading fees              currently structured, ETPs typically pay
                                                  Exchange notes that the payments                           for orders participating in the opening               a flat fee to an exchange for listing
                                                  would be made payable to the ETP or                        and closing auctions. As the CADV                     services regardless of the amount of
                                                  fund, and not to the sponsor of the                        increases for an ETP, so does the                     additional revenue that the product will
                                                  ETP.9                                                      additional trading fee revenue earned by              bring to the exchange. The Issuer
                                                     Specifically, the Exchange is                           the primary listing exchange. As such,                Incentive Program, on the other hand,
                                                  proposing that the Issuer Incentive                        the Exchange is proposing to adopt the                acknowledges the additional revenue
                                                  Program would allow the Exchange to                        above described tiered payment                        brought to the Exchange by virtue of an
                                                  provide payments to the fund on a                          structure for ETPs listed on the                      ETP listing on the Exchange and is
                                                  quarterly basis that would be based on                     Exchange, which it believes creates a                 designed to reward the issuer of an ETP
                                                  the CADV of the ETP for each trading                       more equitable and appropriate                        for such additional revenue, which the
                                                  day of the preceding calendar quarter                      relationship between the Exchange and                 Exchange believes creates a more
                                                  that the ETP was listed on the Exchange,                   issuers based on the revenue and                      equitable and appropriate relationship
                                                  as follows:                                                expenses associated with listing ETPs                 between the Exchange and issuers based
                                                                                                             on the Exchange.                                      on the revenue and expenses associated
                                                                CADV Range                      Annualized      In addition to the proposed changes                with listing ETPs on the Exchange. As
                                                                                                 payment     described above, the Exchange proposes                such, the Exchange believes that that it
                                                  1,000,000–3,000,000 shares ................      $3,000    to eliminate reference to fees for                    is reasonable, fair and equitable, and not
                                                  3,000,001–5,000,000 shares ................      10,000    securities participating in the CLP                   unfairly discriminatory allocation of
                                                  5,000,001–10,000,000 shares ..............       50,000    Program because such program is no
                                                  10,000,001–20,000,000 shares ............       100,000                                                          fees and other charges to provide
                                                  20,000,001–35,000,000 shares ............       250,000
                                                                                                             longer operational and has been                       payment to issuers of ETPs listed on the
                                                  Greater than 35,000,000 shares ...........      400,000    replaced by the Supplemental                          Exchange.
                                                                                                             Competitive Liquidity Provider
                                                                                                             Program, as described in Rule 11.8,                      Similarly, the Exchange believes that
                                                     Because the payments would be
                                                                                                             Interpretation and Policy .03 (the ‘‘ETP              the proposed amendment to the annual
                                                  provided for each trading day, where an
                                                                                                             CLP Program’’).                                       listing fees in Rule 14.13(b)(2)(C) to
                                                  ETP had a CADV of 4,000,000 over the
                                                                                                                The Exchange proposes to implement                 provide tiered payments to issuers of
                                                  course of a full calendar quarter that it
                                                                                                             the amendments to Rule 14.13(b)(2)(C)                 ETPs listed on the Exchange based on
                                                  was listed on the Exchange, the ETP
                                                                                                             effective October 1, 2015.                            the CADV of an ETP is a reasonable, fair
                                                  would receive a payment of $2,500 (.25
                                                                                                                                                                   and equitable, and not unfairly
                                                  * $10,000, the annualized payment for                      2. Statutory Basis                                    discriminatory allocation of fees and
                                                  that CADV) for the quarter. Where the
                                                                                                                The Exchange believes that the                     other charges because it would create a
                                                  same ETP had a CADV of 4,000,000, but
                                                                                                             proposed rule change is consistent with               distribution of fees and other charges
                                                  was only listed on the Exchange for
                                                                                                             the requirements of the Act and the                   applicable to all issuers that are
                                                  exactly half of the trading days in the
                                                                                                             rules and regulations thereunder that                 commensurate with the additional
                                                  calendar quarter, the ETP would receive
                                                                                                             are applicable to a national securities               revenue that an ETP listed on the
                                                  a payment of $1,250 ((.25 * $10,000) *
                                                                                                             exchange, and, in particular, with the                Exchange creates for the Exchange
                                                  .5).
                                                     The Exchange is proposing the Issuer                    requirements of Section 6 of the Act.11               through executions occurring in the
                                                  Incentive Program as a way to attract                      Specifically, the Exchange believes that              auctions and additional shares executed
                                                  both new ETP issues and transfer ETP                       the proposed rule change is consistent                on the Exchange. As described above,
                                                  listings to the Exchange. The Exchange                     with Section 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the               where the CADV of an ETP increases, so
                                                  notes that the Issuer Incentive Program                    Act,12 in that it provides for the                    does the additional trading fee revenue
                                                  would also be applicable to ETPs                           equitable allocation of reasonable dues,              earned by the primary listing exchange.
                                                  currently listed on the Exchange.                          fees and other charges among issuers                  Accordingly, the tiers within the Issuer
                                                  Traditionally, ETP issuers have paid                       and it does not unfairly discriminate                 Incentive Program are designed to
                                                  between $5,000 and $55,000 on an                           between customers, issuers, brokers or                reward the issuer of an ETP on the basis
                                                  annual basis in order to be listed on an                   dealers.                                              of the additional revenue potential that
                                                                                                                The Exchange believes that the                     the ETP brings to the Exchange. Further
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                     7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 73414         proposed amendment to the annual                      to this point, the Exchange does not
                                                  (October 23, 2014), 79 FR 64434 (October 29, 2014)                                                               believe that the proposal is unfairly
                                                  (SR–BATS–2014–050).                                          10 See, e.g., NYSE Arca Equities Schedule of Fees   discriminatory because, as described
                                                     8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75085         and Charges for Exchange Listing Services,            above, the annualized payments
                                                  (June 1, 2015), 80 FR 32190 (June 5, 2015) (SR–            available at: https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/
                                                                                                             nyse/listing/nyse_arca_e_listing_fees.pdf; see also
                                                                                                                                                                   associated with the various CADV tiers
                                                  BATS–2015–39).
                                                     9 The sponsor of an ETP is the registered               NASDAQ Rules 5930 and 5940.                           in the Issuer Incentive Program are
                                                  investment adviser that provides investment                  11 15 U.S.C. 78f.                                   designed to account for the approximate
                                                  management services to such ETP.                             12 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).                     additional revenue that the Exchange


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014    17:19 Oct 14, 2015    Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00132   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM   15OCN1


                                                  62144                       Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 199 / Thursday, October 15, 2015 / Notices

                                                  will receive from an ETP listed on the                  of a corporate security on the                          competitiveness of the Exchange’s
                                                  Exchange within a particular CADV tier.                 Exchange.14 The Exchange believes it is                 listings program by allowing the
                                                  The Exchange notes that certain ETPs in                 reasonable and equitable to limit the                   Exchange to provide ETPs with
                                                  the proposed tiers with higher CADV                     Issuer Incentive Program to ETPs and                    quarterly payments based on the CADV
                                                  would receive disproportionately higher                 not to extend such proposal to corporate                of the ETP, which the Exchange believes
                                                  rebates than ETPs in other tiers with                   listings because the economic structure                 will be directly related to the amount of
                                                  lower CADV. The Exchange believes it                    of operating a listings program for ETPs                additional revenue that the Exchange
                                                  is equitable and not unfairly                           is significantly different than operating               receives from additional transactions in
                                                  discriminatory to provide a                             a listings program for corporates. A                    the ETP. As such, the proposal is a
                                                  disproportionately higher payment to                    primary distinction between ETPs and                    competitive proposal that is intended to
                                                  ETPs in higher tiers because such ETPs                  corporate listings is that the regulation               attract additional ETP listings, which
                                                  would likely bring a disproportionately                 and oversight of ETPs is scalable, such                 will, in turn, benefit the Exchange and
                                                  larger amount of revenue to the                         that while each new ETP requires                        all other BATS-listed ETPs.
                                                  Exchange from the auctions the                          surveillance and results in additional
                                                  Exchange would conduct for such                         regulatory burden on the Exchange,                      C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
                                                  securities and increased trading activity               such burden is rarely related to the                    Statement on Comments on the
                                                  on the Exchange in such securities. The                 governance structure of the fund as                     Proposed Rule Change Received From
                                                  Exchange believes that the additional                   many funds are often issued through the                 Members, Participants or Others
                                                  revenue it will generate from ETPs that                 same governance structure (e.g., a trust).                The Exchange has not solicited, and
                                                  receive payments through the Issuer                     In contrast, each corporate issuance is                 does not intend to solicit, comments on
                                                  Incentive Program, including ETPs that                  typically distinct from any other                       this proposed rule change. The
                                                  qualify for the higher tiers, will exceed               issuance, and thus, the regulatory                      Exchange has not received any written
                                                  the amount of such payments. To the                     burden does not as easily scale as the                  comments from members or other
                                                  extent the additional revenue generated                 number of listings increases. In                        interested parties.
                                                  by ETPs that receive payments through                   addition, corporate listings often
                                                  the Issuer Incentive Program does not                   demand additional oversight with                        III. Date of Effectiveness of the
                                                  exceed the amount of such payments,                     respect to governance and services that                 Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
                                                  the Exchange will modify the structure                  are typically not provided for ETPs,                    Commission Action
                                                  of the Issuer Incentive Program such                    including investor relations services,                     The foregoing rule change has become
                                                  that the program does generate revenue                  public relations, sales and marketing.                  effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
                                                  for the Exchange.                                       These services often demand a large                     of the Act 15 and paragraph (f) of Rule
                                                     In addition, the Exchange does not                   capital commitment from the listings                    19b–4 thereunder.16 At any time within
                                                  believe that it is unfairly discriminatory              exchange. Thus, while the Exchange                      60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
                                                  to exclude ETPs with a CADV of less                     believes that it can adopt a competitive                change, the Commission summarily may
                                                  than 1,000,000 from the Issuer Incentive                and profitable program for ETPs that                    temporarily suspend such rule change if
                                                  Program because such ETPs do not                        includes the Issuer Incentive Program as                it appears to the Commission that such
                                                  typically generate revenue to the same                  proposed, the Exchange would have to                    action is necessary or appropriate in the
                                                  degree as the higher CADV products.                     further analyze whether such a program                  public interest, for the protection of
                                                  The Exchange notes that ETPs with a                     could be applied to corporate securities                investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
                                                  CADV of less than 1,000,000 are eligible                and remain profitable.                                  the purposes of the Act.
                                                  to participate in the ETP CLP Program,                     Based on the foregoing, the Exchange
                                                  which is designed to incent market                      believes that the proposed amendment                    IV. Solicitation of Comments
                                                  makers to provide liquidity in less                     to Rule 14.13(b)(2)(C) to implement the                   Interested persons are invited to
                                                  actively traded products with the goal of               Issuer Incentive Program is a reasonable,               submit written data, views and
                                                  facilitating the growth of such                         equitable, and non-discriminatory                       arguments concerning the foregoing,
                                                  products.13                                             allocation of fees to issuers.                          including whether the proposal is
                                                     The Exchange believes that the                                                                               consistent with the Act. Comments may
                                                  proposal creates a more equitable and                   B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
                                                                                                          Statement on Burden on Competition                      be submitted by any of the following
                                                  appropriate relationship between the                                                                            methods:
                                                  Exchange and issuers tied directly to the                 The Exchange does not believe that
                                                  revenue and expenses associated with                    the proposed rule change will result in                 Electronic Comments
                                                  listing ETPs on the Exchange. As such,                  any burden on competition that is not                     • Use the Commission’s Internet
                                                  the Exchange believes that that it is                   necessary or appropriate in furtherance                 comment form (http://www.sec.gov/
                                                  reasonable, fair and equitable, and not                 of the purposes of the Act, as amended.                 rules/sro.shtml); or
                                                  unfairly discriminatory allocation of                   With respect to the proposed new                          • Send an email to rule-comments@
                                                  fees and other charges to offer payments                pricing for the listing of ETPs, the                    sec.gov. Please include File No. SR–
                                                  to issuers of ETPs listed on the                        Exchange does not believe that the                      BATS–2015–80 on the subject line.
                                                  Exchange that are tiered on the basis of                changes burden competition, but
                                                  the CADV of the ETP.                                    instead, enhance competition, as it is                  Paper Comments
                                                     The Exchange is not currently                        intended to increase the                                  • Send paper comments in triplicate
                                                  proposing to extend the Issuer Incentive                                                                        to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                  Program to corporate securities despite                    14 The Exchange notes that it does not currently
                                                                                                                                                                  Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
                                                  the fact that it currently maintains rules              list any corporate securities and would consider        Washington, DC 20549–1090.
                                                                                                          applicable fees and incentives in the future if the
                                                  and fees necessary to support the listing               Exchange is to list one or more corporate securities,   All submissions should refer to File No.
                                                                                                          particularly if the Exchange was seeking to operate     SR–BATS–2015–80. This file number
                                                    13 Pursuant to Rule 11.8, Interpretation and Policy   a competitive corporate listing business. To the        should be included on the subject line
                                                  .03(n), a security participating in the ETP CLP         extent the Exchange did propose to extend the
                                                  Program will no longer be eligible to participate       Issuer Incentive Program to corporate securities it
                                                                                                                                                                   15 15   U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
                                                  once such security sustains CADV of 1,000,000           would file a separate proposal pursuant to Section
                                                  shares or more for three consecutive months.            19(b)(1) of the Act and Rule 19b–4 thereunder.           16 17   CFR 240.19b–4(f).



                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:19 Oct 14, 2015   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00133   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM     15OCN1


                                                                              Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 199 / Thursday, October 15, 2015 / Notices                                                      62145

                                                  if email is used. To help the                           September 25, 2015, New York Stock                          Section 902.03 of the Manual
                                                  Commission process and review your                      Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or the                            currently provides, in part, for annual
                                                  comments more efficiently, please use                   ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities                  fees for listed equity securities.
                                                  only one method. The Commission will                    and Exchange Commission (the                             Currently, the annual fee for an issuer’s
                                                  post all comments on the Commission’s                   ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule                        primary class of common shares or, if no
                                                  Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/                  change as described in Items I, II, and                  class of common shares is listed on the
                                                  rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the                         III below, which Items have been                         Exchange, the preferred stock of such
                                                  submission, all subsequent                              prepared by the self-regulatory                          issuer is the greater of $45,000 or $0.001
                                                  amendments, all written statements                      organization. The Commission is                          per share. The Exchange proposes to
                                                  with respect to the proposed rule                       publishing this notice to solicit                        increase these thresholds to $52,500 and
                                                  change that are filed with the                          comments on the proposed rule change                     $0.001025, respectively. Currently, the
                                                  Commission, and all written                             from interested persons.                                 annual fee for each additional class of
                                                  communications relating to the                                                                                   common shares, each additional class of
                                                                                                          I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
                                                  proposed rule change between the                                                                                 preferred stock and each class of
                                                                                                          Statement of the Terms of Substance of
                                                  Commission and any person, other than                                                                            warrants is calculated as the greater of
                                                                                                          the Proposed Rule Change
                                                  those that may be withheld from the                                                                              a specified minimum fee or $0.001 per
                                                  public in accordance with the                              The Exchange proposes toamend[sic]                    share. The Exchange proposes to leave
                                                  provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be                     sections 902.03, 902.04, 902.05 and                      the minimum fee for those three
                                                  available for Web site viewing and                      902.06 of the Listed Company Manual                      categories unchanged, but to increase
                                                  printing in the Commission’s Public                     (the ‘‘Manual’’) to increase certain of the              the fee per share for each category to
                                                  Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,                       fees set forth therein. The Exchange                     $0.001025 per share.
                                                  Washington, DC 20549, on official                       proposes to immediately reflect the                         Sections 902.04, 902.05 and 902.06 of
                                                  business days between the hours of                      proposed changes in the Manual, but                      the Manual set forth, in part, the annual
                                                  10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such                 not to implement the proposed fee                        fees for closed-end funds, structured
                                                  filing will also be available for                       changes until January 1, 2016. The text                  products and short-term securities,
                                                  inspection and copying at the principal                 of the proposed rule change is available                 respectively. In each case, the current
                                                  office of the Exchange. All comments                    on the Exchange’s Web site at                            annual fee for these securities is
                                                  received will be posted without change;                 www.nyse.com, at the principal office of                 calculated as the greater of a specified
                                                  the Commission does not edit personal                   the Exchange, and at the Commission’s                    minimum fee or $0.001 per share. The
                                                  identifying information from                            Public Reference Room.                                   Exchange proposes to leave the
                                                  submissions. You should submit only                     II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s                       minimum fee for those three categories
                                                  information that you wish to make                       Statement of the Purpose of, and                         of securities unchanged, but to increase
                                                  available publicly. All submissions                     Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule                   the fee per share for each category to
                                                  should refer to File No. SR–BATS–                       Change                                                   $0.001025 per share.5
                                                  2015–80 and should be submitted on or                                                                               As described below, the Exchange
                                                  before November 5, 2015.                                   In its filing with the Commission, the                proposes to make the aforementioned
                                                                                                          self-regulatory organization included                    fee increases to better reflect the
                                                    For the Commission, by the Division of                statements concerning the purpose of,
                                                  Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated                                                                       Exchange’s costs related to listing equity
                                                  authority.17
                                                                                                          and basis for, the proposed rule change                  securities and the corresponding value
                                                                                                          and discussed any comments it received                   of such listing to issuers.
                                                  Robert W. Errett,
                                                                                                          on the proposed rule change. The text
                                                  Deputy Secretary.                                       of those statements may be examined at                   2. Statutory Basis
                                                  [FR Doc. 2015–26150 Filed 10–14–15; 8:45 am]            the places specified in Item IV below.                      The Exchange believes that the
                                                  BILLING CODE 8011–01–P                                  The Exchange has prepared summaries,                     proposed rule change is consistent with
                                                                                                          set forth in sections A, B, and C below,                 section 6(b) of the Act,6 in general, and
                                                                                                          of the most significant parts of such                    furthers the objectives of sections
                                                  SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE                                 statements.                                              6(b)(4) 7 of the Act, in particular, in that
                                                  COMMISSION                                                                                                       it is designed to provide for the
                                                                                                          A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
                                                  [Release No. 34–76110 ; File No. SR–NYSE–               Statement of the Purpose of, and the                     equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
                                                  2015–44]
                                                                                                          Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule                   fees, and other charges among its
                                                                                                          Change                                                   members and issuers and other persons
                                                  Self-Regulatory Organizations; New                                                                               using its facilities. The Exchange also
                                                  York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of                      1. Purpose                                               believes that the proposed rule change
                                                  Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of                                                                            is consistent with section 6(b)(5) 8 of the
                                                                                                             The Exchange proposes to amend
                                                  Proposed Rule Change Amending                                                                                    Act in that it is not designed to permit
                                                                                                          sections 902.03, 902.04, 902.05 and
                                                  Sections 902.03, 902.04, 902.05 and                                                                              unfair discrimination between
                                                                                                          902.06 of the Manual to increase certain
                                                  902.06 of the Listed Company Manual                                                                              customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
                                                                                                          of the fees set forth therein. The
                                                  To Increase Certain of the Fees Set                                                                                 The Exchange believes that it is
                                                                                                          Exchange proposes to immediately
                                                  Forth Therein                                                                                                    reasonable to amend section 902.03 of
                                                                                                          reflect the proposed changes in the
                                                  October 8, 2015                                         Manual, but not to implement the                         the Manual to increase the minimum
                                                     Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) 1 of the                proposed fee changes until January 1,                    annual fee for an issuer’s primary class
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the                    2016.4                                                   of common shares and primary class of
                                                  ‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3                                                                              5 With respect to closed-end funds, the increase
                                                                                                            4 The Exchange has proposed changes to the
                                                  notice is hereby given that, on                                                                                  to the fee per share will be applicable to both the
                                                                                                          Manual, as reflected in Exhibit 5 attached hereto,
                                                                                                          in a manner that would permit readers of the             primary listed security and each additional class of
                                                    17 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).                                                                                     listed equity securities.
                                                                                                          Manual to identify the changes that would be
                                                    1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).                                                                                            6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
                                                                                                          implemented on January 1, 2016. The Commission
                                                    2 15 U.S.C. 78a.                                                                                                  7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
                                                                                                          notes that Exhibit 5 is attached to the filing, not to
                                                    3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.                                   this Notice.                                                8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).




                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:19 Oct 14, 2015   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00134   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM     15OCN1



Document Created: 2018-02-27 08:52:10
Document Modified: 2018-02-27 08:52:10
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
FR Citation80 FR 62142 

2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR