80 FR 62148 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Request and Comment Request
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 199 (October 15, 2015)
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 199 (October 15, 2015)
| Page Range | 62148-62151 | |
| FR Document | 2015-26120 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 199 (Thursday, October 15, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 62148-62151] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-26120] [[Page 62148]] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION [Docket No: SSA-2015-0058] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Request and Comment Request The Social Security Administration (SSA) publishes a list of information collection packages requiring clearance by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in compliance with Public Law 104-13, the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, effective October 1, 1995. This notice includes revisions of OMB-approved information collections. SSA is soliciting comments on the accuracy of the agency's burden estimate; the need for the information; its practical utility; ways to enhance its quality, utility, and clarity; and ways to minimize burden on respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Mail, email, or fax your comments and recommendations on the information collection(s) to the OMB Desk Officer and SSA Reports Clearance Officer at the following addresses or fax numbers. (OMB) Office of Management and Budget, Attn: Desk Officer for SSA, Fax: 202-395-6974, Email address: OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov. (SSA) Social Security Administration, OLCA, Attn: Reports Clearance Director, 3100 West High Rise, 6401 Security Blvd., Baltimore, MD 21235, Fax: 410-966-2830, Email address: OR.Reports.Clearance@ssa.gov. Or you may submit your comments online through www.regulations.gov, referencing Docket ID Number [SSA-2015-0058]. I. The information collections below are pending at SSA. SSA will submit them to OMB within 60 days from the date of this notice. To be sure we consider your comments, we must receive them no later than December 14, 2015. Individuals can obtain copies of the collection instruments by writing to the above email address. Promoting Readiness of Minors in SSI (PROMISE) Evaluation--0960-0799 Background The Promoting Readiness of Minors in SSI (PROMISE) demonstration pursues positive outcomes for children with disabilities who receive Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and their families by reducing dependency on SSI. The Department of Education (ED) awarded six cooperative agreements to states to improve the provision and coordination of services and support for children with disabilities who receive SSI and their families to achieve improved education and employment outcomes. ED awarded PROMISE funds to five single-state projects, and to one six-state consortium.\1\ With support from ED, the Department of Labor (DOL), and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), SSA is evaluating the six PROMISE projects. SSA contracted with Mathematica Policy Research to conduct the evaluation. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ The six-state consortium project goes by the name Achieving Success by Promoting Readiness for Education and Employment (ASPIRE) rather than by PROMISE. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Under PROMISE, targeted outcomes for youth include an enhanced sense of self-determination; achievement of secondary and post- secondary educational credentials; an attainment of early work experiences culminating with competitive employment in an integrated setting; and long-term reduction in reliance on SSI. Outcomes of interest for families include heightened expectations for and support of the long-term self-sufficiency of their youth; parent or guardian attainment of education and training credentials; and increases in earnings and total income. To achieve these outcomes, we expect the PROMISE projects to make better use of existing resources by improving service coordination among multiple state and local agencies and programs. ED, SSA, DOL, and HHS intend the PROMISE projects to address key limitations in the existing service system for youth with disabilities. By intervening early in the lives of these young people, at ages 14-16, the projects engage the youth and their families well before critical decisions regarding the age 18 redetermination are upon them. We expect the required partnerships among the various state and Federal agencies that serve youth with disabilities to result in improved integration of services and fewer dropped handoffs as youth move from one agency to another. By requiring the programs to engage and serve families and provide youth with paid work experiences, the initiative is mandating the adoption of critical best practices in promoting the independence of youth with disabilities. Project Description SSA is requesting clearance for the collection of data needed to implement and evaluate PROMISE. The evaluation provides empirical evidence on the impact of the intervention for youth and their families in several critical areas, including: (1) Improved educational attainment; (2) increased employment skills, experience, and earnings; and (3) long-term reduction in use of public benefits. We base the PROMISE evaluation on a rigorous design that entails the random assignment of approximately 2,000 youth in each of the six projects to treatment or control groups (12,000 total). The PROMISE projects provide enhanced services for youth in the treatment groups; whereas youth in the control groups are eligible only for those services already available in their communities independent of the interventions. The evaluation assesses the effect of PROMISE services on educational attainment, employment, earnings, and reduced receipt of disability payments. The three components of this evaluation include:The process analysis, which documents program models, assesses the relationships among the partner organizations, documents whether the grantees implemented the programs as planned, identifies features of the programs that may account for their impacts on youth and families, and identifies lessons for future programs with similar objectives. The impact analysis, which determines whether youth and families in the treatment groups receive more services than their counterparts in the control groups. It also determines whether treatment group members have better results than control group members with respect to the targeted outcomes noted above. The cost-benefit analysis, which assesses whether the benefits of PROMISE, including increases in employment and reductions in benefit receipt, are large enough to justify its costs. We conduct this assessment from a range of perspectives, including those of the participants, state and Federal governments, SSA, and society as a whole. SSA planned several data collection efforts for the evaluation. These include: (1) Follow-up interviews with youth and their parent or guardian 18 months and 5 years after enrollment; (2) phone and in- person interviews with local program administrators, program supervisors, and service delivery staff at two points in time over the course of the demonstration; (3) two rounds of focus groups with participating youth in the treatment group; (4) two rounds of focus groups with parents or guardians of participating youth; (5) staff activity logs [[Page 62149]] which provide data on aspects of service delivery; and (6) collection of administrative data. At this time, SSA requests clearance for the staff activity logs. SSA will request clearance for the 5-year survey interviews in a future submission. The respondents are the administrative and direct service staff, as well as some subcontractors whose primary roles with their organizations involve PROMISE service delivery. Type of Request: Revision of an OMB-approved information collection. Time Burden on Respondents 2015: Interviews and Focus Group Discussions, and 18-Month Survey Interviews ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Average Number of Frequency of burden per Estimated Modality of completion respondents response response total annual (minutes) burden (hours) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Staff Interviews with Administrators or 24 1 66 26 Directors...................................... Staff Interviews with PROMISE Project Staff..... 48 1 66 53 Youth Focus Groups--Non-participants............ 20 1 5 8 Youth Focus Groups--Participants................ 100 1 100 33 Parents or Guardian Focus Groups--Non- 100 1 5 8 participants................................... Parents or Guardian Focus Groups--Participants.. 20 1 100 33 --------------------------------------------------------------- Totals...................................... 312 .............. .............. 161 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2015: Interviews and Focus Group Discussions, and 18-Month Survey Interviews ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Average Estimated Number of Frequency of burden per total annual Modality of completion respondents response response burden (minutes) (hours) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Staff Interviews with Administrators or 51 1 66 56 Directors...................................... Staff Interviews with PROMISE Project Staff..... 97 1 66 107 Youth Focus Groups--Non-participants............ 220 1 5 18 Youth Focus Groups--Participants................ 60 1 100 100 Parents or Guardian Focus Groups--Non- 220 1 5 18 participants................................... Parents or Guardian Focus Groups--Participants.. 60 1 100 100 18-Month Survey Interviews--Parent.............. 850 1 41 595 18-Month Survey Interviews--Youth............... 850 1 30 425 --------------------------------------------------------------- Totals...................................... 2,408 .............. .............. 1,405 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2016: Interviews and Focus Group Discussions, Staff Activity Logs, and 18-Month Survey Interviews ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Average Estimated Number of Frequency of burden per total annual Modality of completion respondents response response burden (minutes) (hours) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Staff Interviews with Administrators or 75 1 66 83 Directors...................................... Staff Interviews with PROMISE Project Staff..... 145 1 66 160 Activity Logs for Administrators or Directors... 45 14 5 52 Activity Logs for PROMISE Project Staff......... 135 14 5 157 Youth Focus Groups--Non-participants............ 320 1 5 27 Youth Focus Groups--Participants................ 80 1 100 133 Parents or Guardian Focus Groups--Non- 320 1 5 27 participants................................... Parents or Guardian Focus Groups--Participants.. 80 1 100 133 18-Month Survey Interviews--Parent.............. 5,100 1 41 3,485 18-Month Survey Interviews--Youth............... 5,100 1 30 2,550 --------------------------------------------------------------- Totals...................................... 11,400 .............. .............. 6,807 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2017: 18-Month Survey Interviews ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Average Estimated Number of Frequency of burden per total annual Modality of completion respondents response response burden (minutes) (hours) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 18-Month Survey Interviews--Parent.............. 4,250 1 41 2,904 18-Month Survey Interviews--Youth............... 4,250 1 30 2,125 --------------------------------------------------------------- Totals...................................... 8,500 .............. .............. 5,029 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 62150]] Grand Total ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Average burden Estimated total Modality of completion Number of Frequency of per response annual burden respondents response (minutes) (hours) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Grand Total................................. 22,620 ............... ............... 13,402 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cost Burden for Respondents 2014: Annual Cost to Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Average Total Number of Frequency of burden per Median hourly respondent Respondent type respondents response response wage rate cost (minutes) (dollars) (dollars) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parent or Guardian Focus Group-- 100 1 5 $7.38 $61.00 Non-Participants............... Parent or Guardian Focus Group-- 20 1 100 7.38 246.00 Participants................... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total....................... 120 .............. .............. .............. 307.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2015: Annual Cost to Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Average Total Number of Frequency of burden per Median hourly respondent Respondent type respondents response response wage rate cost (minutes) (dollars) (dollars) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parent or Guardian Focus Group-- 220 1 5 $7.38 $135.00 Non-Participants............... Parent or Guardian Focus Group-- 60 1 100 7.38 738.00 Participants................... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total....................... 280 .............. .............. .............. 873.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2016: Annual Cost to Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Average Total Number of Frequency of burden per Median hourly respondent Respondent type respondents response response wage rate cost (minutes) (dollars) (dollars) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parent or Guardian Focus Group-- 320 1 5 $7.38 $196.00 Non-Participants............... Parent or Guardian Focus Group-- 80 1 100 7.38 984.00 Participants................... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total........................... 400 .............. .............. .............. 1,180.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Grand Total -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Average burden Median hourly Total Respondent type Number of Frequency of per response wage rate respondent respondents response (minutes) (dollars) cost (dollars) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Grand Total........................................................ 800 ............... ............... ............... $2,360.00 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- II. SSA submitted the information collections below to OMB for clearance. Your comments regarding the information collections would be most useful if OMB and SSA receive them 30 days from the date of this publication. To be sure we consider your comments, we must receive them no later than November 16, 2015. Individuals can obtain copies of the OMB clearance packages by writing to OR.Reports.Clearance@ssa.gov. Important Information About Your Appeal, Waiver Rights, and Repayment Options--20 CFR 404.502-521--0960-0779. When SSA accidentally overpays beneficiaries, the agency informs them of the following rights: (1) The right to reconsideration of the overpayment determination; (2) the right to request a waiver of recovery and the automatic scheduling of a personal conference if SSA cannot approve a request for waiver; and (3) the availability of a different rate of withholding when SSA proposes the full withholding rate. SSA uses Form SSA-3105, Important Information About Your Appeal, Waiver Rights, and Repayment Options, to explain these rights to overpaid individuals and allow them to notify SSA of their decision(s) regarding these rights. The respondents are overpaid claimants requesting a waiver of recovery for the overpayment, reconsideration of the fact of the overpayment, or a lesser rate of withholding of the overpayment. This is a correction notice: SSA published the incorrect burden information for this collection at 80 FR 43828, on 7/23/15. We are correcting this error here. [[Page 62151]] Type of Request: Revision of an OMB-approved information collection. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Average Estimated Number of Frequency of burden per total annual Modality of completion respondents response response burden (minutes) (hours) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SSA-3105 Paper form............... 600,000 1 15 150,000 Debt Management System............ 200,000 1 15 50,000 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Totals........................ 800,000 .............. .............. 200,000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dated: October 8, 2015. Naomi R. Sipple, Reports Clearance Officer, Social Security Administration. [FR Doc. 2015-26120 Filed 10-14-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4191-02-P
![62148 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 199 / Thursday, October 15, 2015 / Notices
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Security Income (SSI) and their families and evaluate PROMISE. The evaluation
by reducing dependency on SSI. The provides empirical evidence on the
[Docket No: SSA–2015–0058]
Department of Education (ED) awarded impact of the intervention for youth and
Agency Information Collection six cooperative agreements to states to their families in several critical areas,
Activities: Proposed Request and improve the provision and coordination including: (1) Improved educational
Comment Request of services and support for children attainment; (2) increased employment
with disabilities who receive SSI and skills, experience, and earnings; and (3)
The Social Security Administration their families to achieve improved long-term reduction in use of public
(SSA) publishes a list of information education and employment outcomes. benefits. We base the PROMISE
collection packages requiring clearance ED awarded PROMISE funds to five evaluation on a rigorous design that
by the Office of Management and single-state projects, and to one six-state entails the random assignment of
Budget (OMB) in compliance with consortium.1 With support from ED, the approximately 2,000 youth in each of
Public Law 104–13, the Paperwork Department of Labor (DOL), and the the six projects to treatment or control
Reduction Act of 1995, effective October Department of Health and Human groups (12,000 total). The PROMISE
1, 1995. This notice includes revisions Services (HHS), SSA is evaluating the projects provide enhanced services for
of OMB-approved information six PROMISE projects. SSA contracted youth in the treatment groups; whereas
collections. with Mathematica Policy Research to youth in the control groups are eligible
SSA is soliciting comments on the conduct the evaluation. only for those services already available
accuracy of the agency’s burden Under PROMISE, targeted outcomes in their communities independent of the
estimate; the need for the information; for youth include an enhanced sense of interventions.
its practical utility; ways to enhance its self-determination; achievement of The evaluation assesses the effect of
quality, utility, and clarity; and ways to secondary and post-secondary PROMISE services on educational
minimize burden on respondents, educational credentials; an attainment attainment, employment, earnings, and
including the use of automated of early work experiences culminating reduced receipt of disability payments.
collection techniques or other forms of with competitive employment in an The three components of this evaluation
information technology. Mail, email, or integrated setting; and long-term include:
fax your comments and reduction in reliance on SSI. Outcomes • The process analysis, which
recommendations on the information of interest for families include documents program models, assesses
collection(s) to the OMB Desk Officer heightened expectations for and support the relationships among the partner
and SSA Reports Clearance Officer at of the long-term self-sufficiency of their organizations, documents whether the
the following addresses or fax numbers. youth; parent or guardian attainment of grantees implemented the programs as
planned, identifies features of the
(OMB) education and training credentials; and
programs that may account for their
Office of Management and Budget, increases in earnings and total income.
impacts on youth and families, and
Attn: Desk Officer for SSA, To achieve these outcomes, we expect
identifies lessons for future programs
Fax: 202–395–6974, the PROMISE projects to make better
with similar objectives.
Email address: OIRA_Submission@ use of existing resources by improving • The impact analysis, which
omb.eop.gov. service coordination among multiple determines whether youth and families
state and local agencies and programs. in the treatment groups receive more
(SSA)
Social Security Administration, OLCA, ED, SSA, DOL, and HHS intend the services than their counterparts in the
Attn: Reports Clearance Director, PROMISE projects to address key control groups. It also determines
3100 West High Rise, limitations in the existing service whether treatment group members have
6401 Security Blvd., system for youth with disabilities. By better results than control group
Baltimore, MD 21235, intervening early in the lives of these members with respect to the targeted
Fax: 410–966–2830, young people, at ages 14–16, the outcomes noted above.
Email address: OR.Reports.Clearance@ projects engage the youth and their • The cost-benefit analysis, which
ssa.gov. families well before critical decisions assesses whether the benefits of
regarding the age 18 redetermination are PROMISE, including increases in
Or you may submit your comments upon them. We expect the required employment and reductions in benefit
online through www.regulations.gov, partnerships among the various state receipt, are large enough to justify its
referencing Docket ID Number [SSA– and Federal agencies that serve youth costs. We conduct this assessment from
2015–0058]. with disabilities to result in improved a range of perspectives, including those
I. The information collections below integration of services and fewer of the participants, state and Federal
are pending at SSA. SSA will submit dropped handoffs as youth move from governments, SSA, and society as a
them to OMB within 60 days from the one agency to another. By requiring the whole.
date of this notice. To be sure we programs to engage and serve families SSA planned several data collection
consider your comments, we must and provide youth with paid work efforts for the evaluation. These include:
receive them no later than December 14, experiences, the initiative is mandating (1) Follow-up interviews with youth
2015. Individuals can obtain copies of the adoption of critical best practices in and their parent or guardian 18 months
the collection instruments by writing to promoting the independence of youth and 5 years after enrollment; (2) phone
the above email address. with disabilities. and in-person interviews with local
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Promoting Readiness of Minors in SSI Project Description program administrators, program
(PROMISE) Evaluation—0960–0799 supervisors, and service delivery staff at
SSA is requesting clearance for the two points in time over the course of the
Background collection of data needed to implement demonstration; (3) two rounds of focus
The Promoting Readiness of Minors in 1 The six-state consortium project goes by the
groups with participating youth in the
SSI (PROMISE) demonstration pursues name Achieving Success by Promoting Readiness
treatment group; (4) two rounds of focus
positive outcomes for children with for Education and Employment (ASPIRE) rather groups with parents or guardians of
disabilities who receive Supplemental than by PROMISE. participating youth; (5) staff activity logs
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:19 Oct 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00137 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM 15OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_62347/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 199 / Thursday, October 15, 2015 / Notices 62151
Type of Request: Revision of an OMB-
approved information collection.
Average Estimated total
Number of Frequency of burden per
Modality of completion annual burden
respondents response response (hours)
(minutes)
SSA–3105 Paper form ..................................................................................... 600,000 1 15 150,000
Debt Management System .............................................................................. 200,000 1 15 50,000
Totals ........................................................................................................ 800,000 ........................ ........................ 200,000
Dated: October 8, 2015. 2. Energy Incorporated, Pad ID: 15. SWEPI, LP, Pad ID: Granger 850,
Naomi R. Sipple, Everbe Farms Unit B, ABR–201202024, ABR–201101004, Gaines Township,
Reports Clearance Officer, Social Security Franklin Township, Lycoming County, Tioga County, Pa.; Rescind Date: June
Administration. Pa.; Rescind Date: June 24, 2015. 25, 2015.
[FR Doc. 2015–26120 Filed 10–14–15; 8:45 am] 3. XTO Energy Incorporated, Pad ID: 16. SWEPI, LP, Pad ID: Granger 853,
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P Free Library Unit E, ABR–201107024, ABR–201203017, Gaines Township,
Beech Creek Township, Clinton County, Tioga County, Pa.; Rescind Date: June
Pa.; Rescind Date: June 24, 2015. 25, 2015.
SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN 4. XTO Energy Incorporated, Pad ID: 17. SWEPI, LP, Pad ID: McConnell
COMMISSION PA Tract Unit H, ABR–201206018, 471, ABR–201012055, Charleston
Chapman Township, Clinton County, Township, Tioga County, Pa.; Rescind
Projects Rescinded for Consumptive Pa.; Rescind Date: June 24, 2015. Date: June 25, 2015.
Uses of Water 5. XTO Energy Incorporated, Pad ID: 18. SWEPI, LP, Pad ID: Palmer 809,
PA Tract K, ABR–201208014, Chapman ABR–201006106, Chatham Township,
AGENCY: Susquehanna River Basin Township, Clinton County, Pa.; Rescind Tioga County, Pa.; Rescind Date: June
Commission. Date: June 24, 2015. 25, 2015.
ACTION: Notice. 6. XTO Energy Incorporated, Pad ID: 19. SWEPI, LP, Pad ID: Ritter 828,
Shaner8507H, ABR–201011019, Jordon ABR–201008136, Gaines Township,
SUMMARY: This notice lists the approved
Township, Lycoming County, Pa.; Tioga County, Pa.; Rescind Date: June
by rule projects rescinded by the
Rescind Date: June 24, 2015. 25, 2015.
Susquehanna River Basin Commission 7. XTO Energy Incorporated, Pad ID: 20. SWEPI, LP, Pad ID: Schimmell
during the period set forth in DATES. West Brown A, ABR–201210008, 828, ABR–201010052, Farmington
DATES: July 1–31, 2015. Moreland Township, Lycoming County, Township, Tioga County, Pa.; Rescind
ADDRESSES: Susquehanna River Basin Pa.; Rescind Date: June 24, 2015. Date: June 25, 2015.
Commission, 4423 North Front Street, 8. XTO Energy Incorporated, Pad ID: 21. SWEPI, LP, Pad ID: Sherman 498,
Harrisburg, PA 17110–1788. West Brown B, ABR–201209005, ABR–201009101, Richmond Township,
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Moreland Township, Lycoming County, Tioga County, Pa.; Rescind Date: June
Jason E. Oyler, General Counsel, Pa.; Rescind Date: June 24, 2015. 25, 2015.
telephone: (717) 238–0423, ext. 1312; 9. WPX Energy Appalachia, LLC, Pad 22. SWEPI, LP, Pad ID: Smith 140,
fax: (717) 238–2436; email: joyler@ ID: S. Farver 1V, ABR–201008102, ABR–201007079, Charleston Township,
srbc.net. Regular mail inquiries may be Benton Township, Columbia County, Tioga County, Pa.; Rescind Date: June
sent to the above address. Pa.; Rescind Date: June 24, 2015. 25, 2015.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 10. WPX Energy Appalachia, LLC, 23. SWEPI, LP, Pad ID: State 811,
notice lists the projects, described Pad ID: Campbell Well Pad, ABR– ABR–201009020, Elk Township, Tioga
below, being rescinded for the 201012010, Benton Township, County, Pa.; Rescind Date: June 25,
consumptive use of water pursuant to Columbia County, Pa.; Rescind Date: 2015.
the Commission’s approval by rule June 24, 2015. 24. SWEPI, LP, Pad ID: State 814,
process set forth in 18 CFR 806.22(e) 11. SWN Production Company, LLC, ABR–201010007, Elk Township, Tioga
and 806.22(f) for the time period Pad ID: Wells Pad, ABR–201011014, County, Pa.; Rescind Date: June 25,
specified above: Benton Township, Lackawanna County, 2015.
Pa.; Rescind Date: June 24, 2015. 25. SWEPI, LP, Pad ID: State 816,
Rescinded ABR(e) Issued June 1–31, 12. SWN Production Company, LLC, ABR–201010039, Elk Township, Tioga
2015 Pad ID: NR–19 WALKER–DIEHL PAD, County, Pa.; Rescind Date: June 25,
1. Marcellus GTL, LLC, Altoona ABR–201412009, Oakland Township, 2015.
Project, ABR–201307005, Blair and Susquehanna County, Pa.; Rescind Date: 26. SWEPI, LP, Pad ID: State 818,
Allegheny Townships, Blair County, June 24, 2015. ABR–201010038, Elk Township, Tioga
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Pa.: Rescind Date: July 29, 2015. 13. SWEPI, LP, Pad ID: Fox 813, ABR– County, Pa.; Rescind Date: June 25,
201007006, Gaines Township, Tioga 2015.
Rescinded ABR(f) Issued July 1–31, County, Pa.; Rescind Date: June 25, 27. SWEPI, LP, Pad ID: State 819,
2015 2015. ABR–201007039, Gaines Township,
1. Chief Oil & Gas, LLC, Pad ID: 14. SWEPI, LP, Pad ID: Geiser 907, Tioga County, Pa.; Rescind Date: June
Inderlied Drilling Pad, ABR–201304020, ABR–201104003, Abbott Township, 25, 2015.
Lathrop Township, Susquehanna Potter County, Pa.; Rescind Date: June 28. SWEPI, LP, Pad ID: State 820,
County, Pa.; Rescind Date: June 5, 2015. 25, 2015. ABR–201010037, Gaines Township,
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:19 Oct 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00140 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM 15OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_62347/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-27 08:52:13
Document Modified: 2018-02-27 08:52:13
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 62148 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR