80 FR 63678 - Safety Zone; 520 Bridge Construction, Lake Washington, Seattle, WA

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 203 (October 21, 2015)

Page Range		63678-63680
FR Document		2015-26754

The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on Lake Washington around the east span of the 520 Bridge in Seattle, Washington due to ongoing construction. The safety zone is necessary to ensure the safety of the maritime public and workers involved in the bridge construction when construction barges are located in the east span of the bridge. The safety zone will prohibit any person or vessel from entering or remaining in the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or his Designated Representative.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 203 (Wednesday, October 21, 2015)

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 203 (Wednesday, October 21, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 63678-63680]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-26754]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2015-0570]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; 520 Bridge Construction, Lake Washington, Seattle, 
WA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on 
Lake Washington around the east span of the 520 Bridge in Seattle, 
Washington due to ongoing construction. The safety zone is necessary to 
ensure the safety of the maritime public and workers involved in the 
bridge construction when construction barges are located in the east 
span of the bridge. The safety zone will prohibit any person or vessel 
from entering or remaining in the safety zone unless authorized by the 
Captain of the Port or his Designated Representative.

DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from October 21, 
2015 through November 30, 2015. For the purposes of enforcement, actual 
notice will be used from October 2, 2015 until October 21, 2015.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2015-0570 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email Ryan Griffin, Waterways Management Division, Coast Guard 
Sector Puget Sound; telephone (206) 217-6051, email 
[email protected]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive order
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice 
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of 
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 
with respect to this rule because of an unexpected extension of 
construction. With construction still in progress the safety zone needs 
to be extended until November 30, 2015. Due to the nature of the delay 
and the need to extend the safety zone immediately, it would be 
impracticable to issue an NPRM and solicit comment before finalizing 
this rule.
    We are issuing this rule, and under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast 
Guard finds that good cause exists for making it effective less than 30 
days after publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective 
date of this rule would be contrary to public interest because 
immediate action is needed to respond to the potential safety hazards 
associated with the construction of the east span of the 520 Bridge.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C. 
1231. The Captain of the Port Puget sound (COTP) has determined that 
potential hazards associated with bridge construction continuing on 
October 2, 2015 will be a safety concern for anyone within a 100-yard 
radius of the 520 Bridge east span construction operations. This rule 
is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in 
the navigable waters within the safety zone while the bridge is being 
repaired.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    The safety zone established in this rule encompasses all waters 
within 100 yards of the east span of the 520 Bridge, located on Lake 
Washington and is effective from October 2, 2015 through November 30, 
2015 when a construction barge is present in the safety zone. Vessels 
wishing to enter the safety zone must request permission to do so from 
the Captain of the Port by contacting the Joint Harbor Operations 
Center at 206-217-6001 or VHF Channel 16. If permission for entry is 
granted, vessels must proceed at a minimum speed for safe navigation.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and

[[Page 63679]]

executive orders (E.O.s) related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our 
analyses based on a number of these statutes and E.O.s, and we discuss 
First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and 
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is 
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. 
E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and 
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting 
flexibility. This rule has not been designated a ``significant 
regulatory action,'' under E.O. 12866. Accordingly, it has not been 
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
    This rule is not a significant regulatory action as the safety zone 
established by it is both limited in size and duration and there is an 
alternative route for vessels with an air draft that permits safe 
passage under the west span of the bridge.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any 
vessel owner or operator, because the zone established in this rule is 
limited in size and duration and there is an alternative route for 
vessels with an air draft that permits safe passage under the west span 
of the bridge.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under E.O. 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in E.O. 13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under E.O. 13175, 
Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because 
it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian 
tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian 
tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between 
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If you believe this rule has 
implications for federalism or Indian tribes, please contact the person 
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this 
action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or 
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This 
rule involves a temporary safety zone lasting less than 60 days that 
will prohibit entry within 100 yards of the east span of the 520 bridge 
during times of construction operations. It is categorically excluded 
from further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the 
Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis checklist supporting 
this determination and a Categorical Exclusion Determination are 
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any 
comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant 
environmental impact from this rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
Recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.


0
2. Add Sec.  165.T13-290 to read as follows:

[[Page 63680]]

Sec.  165.T13-290  Safety Zone; 520 Bridge, Lake Washington; Seattle, 
WA.

    (a) Location: The following area is designated as a safety zone: 
All waters within 100 yards of the east span of the 520 Bridge located 
on Lake Washington in Seattle, Washington.
    (b) Regulations: In accordance with the general regulations in 33 
CFR 165, Subpart C, no person may enter the safety zone or bring or 
cause to be brought any vessel into the safety zone without permission 
of the Captain of the Port. Persons wishing to enter the safety zone 
must request permission from the Captain of the Port by contacting the 
Joint Harbor Operation Center at 206-217-6001 or VHF Channel 16. If 
permission for entry is granted, vessels must proceed at a minimum 
speed for safe navigation.
    (c) Dates: This rule is effective from October 2, 2015, through 
November 30, 2015, when a construction barge is present inside the 
safety zone.

    Dated: September 30, 2015.
M.W. Raymond,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2015-26754 Filed 10-20-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04P

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 203 / Wednesday, October 21, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 63679

executive orders (E.O.s) related to Small businesses may send comments we do discuss the effects of this rule
rulemaking. Below we summarize our on the actions of Federal employees elsewhere in this preamble.
analyses based on a number of these who enforce, or otherwise determine
statutes and E.O.s, and we discuss First compliance with, Federal regulations to F. Environment
Amendment rights of protestors. the Small Business and Agriculture We have analyzed this rule under
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman Department of Homeland Security
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
and the Regional Small Business Management Directive 023–01 and
E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
to assess the costs and benefits of Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
available regulatory alternatives and, if which guide the Coast Guard in
annually and rates each agency’s
regulation is necessary, to select complying with the National
responsiveness to small business. If you
regulatory approaches that maximize Environmental Policy Act of 1969(42
wish to comment on actions by
net benefits. E.O. 13563 emphasizes the employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
importance of quantifying both costs 888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The determined that this action is one of a
and benefits, of reducing costs, of Coast Guard will not retaliate against category of actions that do not
harmonizing rules, and of promoting small entities that question or complain individually or cumulatively have a
flexibility. This rule has not been about this rule or any policy or action significant effect on the human
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory of the Coast Guard. environment. This rule involves a
action,’’ under E.O. 12866. Accordingly, temporary safety zone lasting less than
it has not been reviewed by the Office C. Collection of Information 60 days that will prohibit entry within
of Management and Budget. This rule will not call for a new 100 yards of the east span of the 520
This rule is not a significant collection of information under the bridge during times of construction
regulatory action as the safety zone Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 operations. It is categorically excluded
established by it is both limited in size U.S.C. 3501–3520). from further review under paragraph
and duration and there is an alternative 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
route for vessels with an air draft that D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments Instruction. An environmental analysis
permits safe passage under the west checklist supporting this determination
span of the bridge. A rule has implications for federalism and a Categorical Exclusion
under E.O. 13132, Federalism, if it has Determination are available in the
B. Impact on Small Entities a substantial direct effect on the States, docket where indicated under
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of on the relationship between the national ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, government and the States, or on the information that may lead to the
requires Federal agencies to consider distribution of power and discovery of a significant environmental
the potential impact of regulations on responsibilities among the various impact from this rule.
small entities during rulemaking. The levels of government. We have analyzed
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small this rule under that Order and have G. Protest Activities
businesses, not-for-profit organizations determined that it is consistent with the
that are independently owned and fundamental federalism principles and The Coast Guard respects the First
operated and are not dominant in their preemption requirements described in Amendment rights of protesters.
fields, and governmental jurisdictions E.O. 13132. Protesters are asked to contact the
with populations of less than 50,000. Also, this rule does not have tribal person listed in the FOR FURTHER
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. implications under E.O. 13175, INFORMATION CONTACT section to
605(b) that this rule will not have a Consultation and Coordination with coordinate protest activities so that your
significant economic impact on a Indian Tribal Governments, because it message can be received without
substantial number of small entities. does not have a substantial direct effect jeopardizing the safety or security of
While some owners or operators of on one or more Indian tribes, on the people, places or vessels.
vessels intending to transit the safety relationship between the Federal
zone may be small entities, for the List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
reasons stated in section V.A above, this distribution of power and Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
rule will not have a significant responsibilities between the Federal (water), Reporting and Recordkeeping
economic impact on any vessel owner Government and Indian tribes. If you requirements, Security measures,
or operator, because the zone believe this rule has implications for Waterways.
established in this rule is limited in size federalism or Indian tribes, please
and duration and there is an alternative contact the person listed in the FOR For the reasons discussed in the
route for vessels with an air draft that FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
permits safe passage under the west above. CFR part 165 as follows:
span of the bridge.
Under section 213(a) of the Small E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
Business Regulatory Enforcement The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
we want to assist small entities in Federal agencies to assess the effects of ■ 1. The authority citation for part 165
understanding this rule. If the rule their discretionary regulatory actions. In continues to read as follows:
would affect your small business, particular, the Act addresses actions
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
organization, or governmental that may result in the expenditure by a 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
jurisdiction and you have questions State, local, or tribal government, in the Department of Homeland Security Delegation
concerning its provisions or options for aggregate, or by the private sector of No. 0170.1.
compliance, please contact the person $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION more in any one year. Though this rule ■ 2. Add § 165.T13–290 to read as
CONTACT section. will not result in such an expenditure, follows:

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:24 Oct 20, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\21OCR1.SGM 21OCR1

63680 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 203 / Wednesday, October 21, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

§ 165.T13–290 Safety Zone; 520 Bridge, requests for hearings must be received C. How can I file an objection or hearing
Lake Washington; Seattle, WA. on or before December 21, 2015, and request?
(a) Location: The following area is must be filed in accordance with the Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
designated as a safety zone: All waters instructions provided in 40 CFR part U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
within 100 yards of the east span of the 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the objection to any aspect of this regulation
520 Bridge located on Lake Washington SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
and may also request a hearing on those
in Seattle, Washington. ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, objections. You must file your objection
(b) Regulations: In accordance with
identified by docket identification (ID) or request a hearing on this regulation
the general regulations in 33 CFR 165,
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0374, is in accordance with the instructions
Subpart C, no person may enter the
available at http://www.regulations.gov provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
safety zone or bring or cause to be
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs proper receipt by EPA, you must
brought any vessel into the safety zone
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
without permission of the Captain of the
in the Environmental Protection Agency OPP–2014–0374 in the subject line on
Port. Persons wishing to enter the safety
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William the first page of your submission. All
zone must request permission from the
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 objections and requests for a hearing
Captain of the Port by contacting the
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC must be in writing, and must be
Joint Harbor Operation Center at 206–
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room received by the Hearing Clerk on or
217–6001 or VHF Channel 16. If
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., before December 21, 2015. Addresses for
permission for entry is granted, vessels
Monday through Friday, excluding legal mail and hand delivery of objections
must proceed at a minimum speed for
holidays. The telephone number for the and hearing requests are provided in 40
safe navigation.
(c) Dates: This rule is effective from Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, CFR 178.25(b).
October 2, 2015, through November 30, and the telephone number for the OPP In addition to filing an objection or
2015, when a construction barge is Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
present inside the safety zone. the visitor instructions and additional as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
information about the docket available submit a copy of the filing (excluding
Dated: September 30, 2015. at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. any Confidential Business Information
M.W. Raymond, (CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Robert McNally, Biopesticides and Information not marked confidential
Port Puget Sound. pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
Pollution Prevention Division (7511P),
[FR Doc. 2015–26754 Filed 10–20–15; 8:45 am]
Office of Pesticide Programs, disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
BILLING CODE 9110–04P
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, objection or hearing request, identified
DC 20460–0001; main telephone by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION number: (703) 305–7090; email address: 2014–0374, by one of the following
AGENCY BPPDFRNotices@epa.gov. methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://
40 CFR Part 180 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0374; FRL–9933–73] I. General Information instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
A. Does this Action apply to me? information you consider to be CBI or
Potassium Salts of Hops Beta Acids;
Exemption From the Requirement of a You may be potentially affected by other information whose disclosure is
Tolerance this action if you are an agricultural restricted by statute.
producer, food manufacturer, or • Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
Agency (EPA). pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
ACTION: Final rule. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather • Hand Delivery: To make special
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an arrangements for hand delivery or
exemption from the requirement of a provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document delivery of boxed information, please
tolerance for residues of the biochemical follow the instructions at http://www.
pesticide potassium salts of hops beta applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include: epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
acids in or on honey and honeycomb for Additional instructions on commenting
the control of Varroa mites in • Crop production (NAICS code 111).
or visiting the docket, along with more
accordance with label directions and • Animal production (NAICS code information about dockets generally, is
good agricultural practices. Interregional 112). available at http://www.epa.gov/
Research Project Number 4, on behalf of • Food manufacturing (NAICS code dockets.
Beta Tec Hop Products, Inc., submitted 311).
a petition to EPA under the Federal • Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS II. Background and Statutory Findings
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), code 32532). In the Federal Register of September
requesting an exemption from the 5, 2014 (79 FR 53009) (FRL–9914–98),
requirement of a tolerance. This B. How can I get electronic access to
EPA issued a document pursuant to
regulation eliminates the need to other related information?
FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES

establish a maximum permissible level You may access a frequently updated 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a
for residues of potassium salts of hops electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 pesticide tolerance petition (PP 3E8217)
beta acids in or on honey and through the Government Printing by Interregional Research Project
honeycomb. Office’s e-CFR site at http://www.ecfr. Number 4, 500 College Road East, Suite
DATES: This regulation is effective gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ 201W, Princeton, NJ 08540, on behalf of
October 21, 2015. Objections and ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl. BetaTec Hop Products, Inc. (the

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:24 Oct 20, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\21OCR1.SGM 21OCR1

Document Created: 2018-02-27 08:54:25
Document Modified: 2018-02-27 08:54:25

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective without actual notice from October 21, 2015 through November 30, 2015. For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice will be used from October 2, 2015 until October 21, 2015.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, call or email Ryan Griffin, Waterways Management Division, Coast Guard Sector Puget Sound; telephone (206) 217-6051, email [email protected]
FR Citation		80 FR 63678
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

80 FR 63678 - Safety Zone; 520 Bridge Construction, Lake Washington, Seattle, WA

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 203 (October 21, 2015)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard