80 FR 66033 - Final Supplementary Rules for the Castle Rocks Land Use Plan Amendment Area, Idaho
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 208 (October 28, 2015)
Bureau of Land Management
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 208 (October 28, 2015)
| Page Range | 66033-66035 | |
| FR Document | 2015-27373 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 208 (Wednesday, October 28, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 66033-66035] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-27373] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management [LLIDT02000.L12200000.MA0000.241A.00 4500079363] Final Supplementary Rules for the Castle Rocks Land Use Plan Amendment Area, Idaho AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior. ACTION: Notice of final supplementary rules. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is finalizing supplementary rules for all BLM-administered public lands within an approximately 400-acre area in Idaho known as Castle Rocks. The BLM addressed this area in the November 2013 Cassia Resource Management Plan (RMP) Amendment and Record of Decision (ROD). The Cassia RMP amendment made implementation-level decisions designed to conserve natural and cultural resources while providing for recreational opportunities. These supplementary rules will allow the BLM and law enforcement partners to enforce those decisions. DATES: These supplementary rules are effective on November 27, 2015. ADDRESSES: You may direct your inquiries to the Bureau of Land Management, Burley Field Office, 15 East 200 South, Burley, Idaho 83318. email: [email protected]. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dennis Thompson, Outdoor Recreation Planner, at 208-677-6664 or by email at [[Page 66034]] [email protected]. Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1- 800-877-8339 to contact Mr. Thompson. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background II. Discussion of Public Comments III. Discussion of Supplementary Rules IV. Procedural Matters I. Background Castle Rocks is a dramatic geologic area located in the southern Albion Mountain Range of Cassia County, Idaho. Castle Rocks consists primarily of quartz-monzonite, a type of granite associated with the Almo Pluton. Pinnacles and monoliths, towering over 400 feet in local relief, characterize the area. Castle Rocks currently contains nearly pristine cultural and natural resources. Until 2003, a difficult and lengthy hike from Stines Pass was the only way to access Castle Rocks, due to the unique ownership pattern and geography of the surrounding lands. This limited access helped preserve rare resources that are of great importance to the Shoshone- Bannock Tribes of Fort Hall and the Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of Duck Valley. Castle Rocks became less isolated after the passage of the Castle Rock Ranch Acquisition Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-421), which authorized the National Park Service (NPS) to purchase a private ranch that provided more convenient public access on the east side of the geologic area. After the acquisition, the NPS exchanged the property with the Idaho Department of Parks and Recreation (IDPR) for other lands adjacent to existing NPS properties. Since May 25, 2003, the IDPR has provided park facilities and managed recreation at Castle Rocks. Since 2003, the BLM has been protecting resources on the 400-acre parcel under its management through a series of temporary closure orders prohibiting rock climbing, camping, staging, and trail building. In 2012, the BLM determined that amending the Cassia RMP was necessary to properly manage the area. The decision in the Plan Amendment is to close the area permanently to rock climbing, camping, staging, and trail building. This decision will protect significant cultural resources that were, or had the potential to be, adversely impacted by these activities. The Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of Fort Hall and the Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of Duck Valley consider the area a sacred site and have requested the assistance of the BLM Burley Field Office in nominating the area as a Traditional Cultural Property under the National Historic Preservation Act. These supplementary rules will help the BLM achieve management objectives and implement the Cassia RMP amendment. They will also provide the BLM with enforcement capability to help prevent damage to cultural and natural resources. II. Discussion of Public Comments The BLM published the proposed supplementary rules in the Federal Register on October 15, 2014 (79 FR 61899). Public comments were accepted for a 60-day period ending on December 15, 2014. The BLM received three comments. One comment favored protecting the resources, one comment was against any restriction on Federal lands, and the third comment did not apply to the Castle Rocks area. The comments received were not specific or confined to the issues pertinent to the proposed rules, nor did they recommend change or clarification; therefore, no changes were made to the proposed supplementary rules. III. Discussion of Supplementary Rules Supplementary rules are necessary to protect the cultural and natural resources within the 400-acre BLM parcel at Castle Rocks as described in the environmental assessment (EA) for the Cassia RMP amendment. The supplementary rules prohibit traditional rock climbing, sport rock climbing, bouldering, staging, trail building, and camping on BLM- administered public land within the Castle Rocks area because of potential adverse effects to significant Traditional Cultural Properties, and rare historic, geologic, scenic and cultural resources resulting from these activities. Use of the existing Stines Creek trail as shown on the 2012 Oakley 1:100,000 surface management Status Map and free solo climbing--that is, climbing which does not use ropes, harnesses or other protective gear during ascent--are still authorized. The EA for the Cassia RMP amendment (Appendix II) designates the trail appropriate for foot, horse, or bike use and describes the authorized course of the trail. IV. Procedural Matters Executive Orders 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review The final supplementary rules are not a significant regulatory action and are not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866. They will not have an effect of $100 million or more on the economy. They will not adversely affect, in a material way, the economy; productivity; competition; jobs; environment; public health or safety; or State, local, or tribal governments or communities. The final supplementary rules will not create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency. They will not materially alter the budgetary effects of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the right or obligations of their recipients; nor will they raise novel legal or policy issues. The supplementary rules merely contain rules of conduct for public use of a limited selection of public lands to prevent adverse effects to significant traditional cultural properties and rare historic, geologic, and scenic values at Castle Rocks. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) The BLM prepared an EA as part of the development of the Cassia RMP amendment at Castle Rocks. During that NEPA process, alternative decisions for the Cassia RMP amendment were fully analyzed or discussed and offered for public comment, including the substance of these supplementary rules. The pertinent analysis can be found in Chapter 4 of the Cassia RMP Amendment and Proposed Decision Record, April 2013. The ROD for the Cassia RMP was signed by the Idaho BLM State Director on November 20, 2013. These final supplementary rules will provide for enforcement of the plan decisions. The rationale for the decisions made is fully covered in the ROD, which is available for review in the BLM administrative record at the location specified in the ADDRESSES section and online at https://eplanning.blm.gov/epl-front-office/eplanning/planAndProjectSite.do?methodName=dispatchToPatternPage¤tPageId=47887. Regulatory Flexibility Act Congress enacted the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), as amended, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, to ensure that Government regulations do not unnecessarily or disproportionately burden small entities. The RFA requires a regulatory flexibility analysis if a rule will have a significant economic impact, either detrimental or beneficial, on a substantial number of small entities. These final supplementary rules will merely establish rules of conduct for use of a limited area of public lands and will have no effect on business entities of any size. Therefore, the BLM has determined, under the RFA, that the final supplementary rules will not have [[Page 66035]] a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act These final supplementary rules do not constitute a ``major rule'' as defined at 5 U.S.C. 804(2). They will not result in an effect on the economy of $100 million or more, an increase in costs or prices, or significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of United States-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises in domestic and export markets. These final supplementary rules will merely establish rules of conduct for use of a limited area of public lands and do not affect commercial or business activities of any kind. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act These final supplementary rules will not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100 million per year nor do they have a significant or unique effect on State, local, or tribal governments or the private sector. Therefore, the BLM is not required to prepare a statement containing the information required by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Executive Order 12630, Governmental Actions and Interference With Constitutionally Protected Property Rights (Takings) These final supplementary rules will not have significant takings implications nor will they be capable of interfering with constitutionally protected property rights. Therefore, the BLM has determined that these rules will not cause a ``taking'' of private property or require preparation of a takings assessment. Executive Order 13132, Federalism These final supplementary rules will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the Federal Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. These final supplementary rules will not conflict with any law or regulation of the State of Idaho. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 13132, the BLM has determined that these final supplementary rules will not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant preparation of a Federalism Assessment. Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform The BLM has determined that these final supplementary rules will not unduly burden the judicial system and that they meet the requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988. Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments Consultation and Coordination with the Shoshone-Bannock and the Shoshone-Paiute Tribes has been ongoing since 2010. The Tribes have been fully briefed and support these supplementary rules. Information Quality Act The Information Quality Act (Section 515 of Pub. L. 106-554) requires Federal agencies to maintain adequate quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of the information that they disseminate. In developing these supplementary rules, the BLM did not conduct or use a study, experiment, or survey or disseminate any information to the public. Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use These final supplementary rules will not constitute a significant energy action. These final supplementary rules will not have an adverse effect on energy supplies, production, or consumption, and have no connection with energy policy. Paperwork Reduction Act These final supplementary rules do not contain information collection requirements that the Office of Management and Budget must approve under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. Author The principal author of these supplementary rules is Amanda M. Dodson, Acting Burley Field Manager, Bureau of Land Management. For the reasons stated in the Preamble, and under the authority of 43 CFR 8365.1-6, the Burley Field Office, Bureau of Land Management, establishes supplementary rules for BLM-administered lands covered under the Cassia Resource Management Plan Amendment at Castle Rocks, to read as follows: Supplementary Rules for the Portion of the Castle Rocks Area Managed by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management Definitions Traditional rock climbing means a style of climbing where a climber or group of climbers places all gear required to protect against falls and removes it when passage is complete. Sport rock climbing means a style of climbing that relies on fixed protection against falls, usually bolts and/or top anchors. Bouldering means ropeless climbing that involves short, sequential moves on rock usually no more than 20 feet off the ground and uses bouldering crash pads at the base of the climbing area to prevent injuries from falls. Staging means assembling, unpacking or otherwise preparing gear for climbing; typically conducted at the base of the cliff, where gear such a backpacks may also be left during a climb, but in some cases, is conducted at the top of a cliff. Trail building means the act of creating new travel routes through the use of tools; or user-created trails developed through repeated visits to a specific destination. EA DOI-BLM-ID-T020-2013- 0010-EA Appendix II serves as the baseline for existing trails on BLM lands. Camping means setting up, occupying or making use of a place for shelter or overnight stay. On BLM-administered public land within the Castle Rocks area, the following supplementary rules apply: 1. Traditional and sport rock climbing and bouldering are prohibited. 2. Staging is prohibited. 3. Camping is prohibited. 4. Trail building is prohibited. Exceptions: The following persons are exempt from these supplementary rules: A. Any Federal, State, local, and/or military employee acting within the scope of their duties; B. Members of any organized rescue or fire-fighting force performing an official duty; and C. Persons, agencies, municipalities or companies holding an existing special use permit and operating within the scope of their permit. Penalties: On public lands under Section 303(a) of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1733(a)) and 43 CFR 8360.0-7, any person who violates any of these supplementary rules may be tried before a United States Magistrate and fined no more than $1,000 or imprisoned for no more than 12 months or both. Such violations may also be subject to enhanced fines provided for by 18 U.S.C. 3571. Timothy M. Murphy, BLM Idaho State Director. [FR Doc. 2015-27373 Filed 10-27-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310-GG-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 208 / Wednesday, October 28, 2015 / Notices 66033
take must be incidental to actions that updated to follow our finalized permit issuance. Before including your
are otherwise lawful. The Eagle Act’s guidance, Eagle Conservation Plan address, phone number, email address,
implementing regulations define ‘‘take’’ Guidance Module 1: Land-Based Wind or other personal identifying
as to ‘‘pursue, shoot, shoot at, poison, Energy Version 2 (Service 2013) (ECP information in your comment, you
wound, kill, capture, trap, collect, Guidance) (http://www.fws.gov/ should be aware that your entire
destroy, molest, or disturb’’ individuals, migratorybirds/PDFs/Eagle%2 comment—including your personal
their nests and eggs (50 CFR 22.3); and 0Conservation%20Plan%20Guidance- identifying information—may be made
‘‘disturb’’ is further defined as ‘‘to Module%201.pdf). publicly available at any time. While
agitate or bother a bald or golden eagle As recommended in the Service’s ECP you can ask us in your comment to
to a degree that causes . . . (1) injury to Guidance, the applicant’s plan outlines withhold your personal identifying
an eagle, . . .(2) a decrease in its avoidance and minimization measures, information from public review, we
productivity, . . . or (3) nest contains a risk assessment, includes cannot guarantee that we will be able to
abandonment’’ (50 CFR 22.3). The Alta experimental advanced conservation do so.
East Wind Project will result in practices, and adaptive management.
recurring eagle mortalities over the life The applicant submitted the ECP as part Authority
of the project, so the appropriate type of of the permit application, and if we We provide this notice under Section
take permit is the programmatic permit issue the permit following the National 668a of the Eagle Act (16 U.S.C. 668–
under 50 CFR 22.26. Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) 668c) and NEPA regulations (40 CFR
We may consider issuance of process, then the conservation 1506.6).
programmatic eagle take permits if: (1) commitments would become conditions
The incidental take is necessary to Alexandra Pitts,
of the permit.
protect legitimate interests; (2) the take The Service independently evaluated Deputy Regional Director, Pacific Southwest,
is compatible with the preservation Sacramento, California.
the risk of eagle fatalities from project
standard of the Eagle Act—providing for operations and compared that risk to the [FR Doc. 2015–27240 Filed 10–27–15; 8:45 am]
stable or increasing breeding conservation measures to which the BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
populations; (3) the take has been applicant has committed. This is an
avoided and minimized to the degree essential step in the Service’s evaluation
achievable through implementation of of an application for a permit for DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Advanced Compensation Practices, and programmatic take of eagles because Bureau of Land Management
the remaining take is unavoidable; and issuing criteria require permitted take to
(4) compensatory mitigation will be comply with the Eagle Act’s [LLIDT02000.L12200000.MA0000.241A.00
provided for any remaining take. The preservation standard. The Service has 4500079363]
Service must determine that the direct interpreted this standard to require
and indirect effects of the take and Final Supplementary Rules for the
maintenance of stable or increasing
required mitigation, together with the Castle Rocks Land Use Plan
breeding populations of eagles (74 FR
cumulative effects of other permitted Amendment Area, Idaho
46836; September 11, 2009). In the DEA,
take and additional factors affecting we evaluate the risk and offsetting AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management,
eagle populations, are compatible with conservation measures, and the Interior.
the preservation of bald eagles and implications for direct, indirect, and ACTION: Notice of final supplementary
golden eagles. cumulative effects under five rules.
Applicant’s Proposal alternatives.
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land
The permit applicant, Alta Wind X, Next Steps Management (BLM) is finalizing
LLC, is operating an approximately 150- The public process for the proposed supplementary rules for all BLM-
megawatt (MW) commercial wind- Federal permit action will be completed administered public lands within an
energy facility in the Tehachapi WRA in after the public comment period, at approximately 400-acre area in Idaho
Kern County, California. The recently which time we will evaluate the permit known as Castle Rocks. The BLM
constructed (December 2013) Alta East application and comments submitted addressed this area in the November
Wind Project was a new wind energy thereupon to determine whether the 2013 Cassia Resource Management Plan
project on public (Bureau of Land application meets the permitting (RMP) Amendment and Record of
Management) and private lands and was requirements under the Eagle Act, Decision (ROD). The Cassia RMP
an expansion of Terra-Gen’s Alta Wind applicable regulations, and NEPA amendment made implementation-level
Energy Center. The Bureau of Land requirements. Upon completion of that decisions designed to conserve natural
Management and Kern County evaluation, we will select our course of and cultural resources while providing
permitted Alta Wind X, LLC to action. We will make the final permit for recreational opportunities. These
construct, operate, maintain, and decision no sooner than 30 days after supplementary rules will allow the BLM
decommission up to 51 wind turbine the close of the public comment period. and law enforcement partners to enforce
generators and related infrastructure on those decisions.
approximately 2,600 acres of public and Public Comments
DATES: These supplementary rules are
private land in 2013. We invite public comment on the
The applicant submitted an ECP on effective on November 27, 2015.
proposed DEA. If you wish, you may
ADDRESSES: You may direct your
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
March 4, 2013, that was initially submit comments by any one of the
developed following recommendations methods discussed above under inquiries to the Bureau of Land
provided by the Service and consistent ADDRESSES. Management, Burley Field Office, 15
with our January 2011 Draft Eagle East 200 South, Burley, Idaho 83318.
Conservation Plan Guidance (http:// Public Availability of Comments email: BLM_ID_BurleyOffice@blm.gov.
www.fws.gov/windenergy/docs/ECP_ We will consider public comments on FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
draft_guidance_2_10_final_clean_ the DEA when making the final Dennis Thompson, Outdoor Recreation
omb.pdf). The Draft ECP was later determination on NEPA compliance and Planner, at 208–677–6664 or by email at
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:16 Oct 27, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM 28OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_66241/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 208 / Wednesday, October 28, 2015 / Notices 66035
a significant economic impact on a Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Supplementary Rules for the Portion of the
substantial number of small entities. Reform Castle Rocks Area Managed by the U.S.
Bureau of Land Management
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement The BLM has determined that these Definitions
Fairness Act final supplementary rules will not
Traditional rock climbing means a style of
unduly burden the judicial system and
These final supplementary rules do climbing where a climber or group of
not constitute a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined that they meet the requirements of climbers places all gear required to protect
at 5 U.S.C. 804(2). They will not result sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive against falls and removes it when passage is
in an effect on the economy of $100 Order 12988. complete.
million or more, an increase in costs or Sport rock climbing means a style of
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
prices, or significant adverse effects on climbing that relies on fixed protection
and Coordination with Indian Tribal against falls, usually bolts and/or top
competition, employment, investment, Governments
productivity, innovation, or the ability anchors.
Bouldering means ropeless climbing that
of United States-based enterprises to Consultation and Coordination with involves short, sequential moves on rock
compete with foreign-based enterprises the Shoshone-Bannock and the usually no more than 20 feet off the ground
in domestic and export markets. These Shoshone-Paiute Tribes has been and uses bouldering crash pads at the base
final supplementary rules will merely ongoing since 2010. The Tribes have of the climbing area to prevent injuries from
establish rules of conduct for use of a been fully briefed and support these falls.
limited area of public lands and do not supplementary rules. Staging means assembling, unpacking or
affect commercial or business activities otherwise preparing gear for climbing;
of any kind. Information Quality Act typically conducted at the base of the cliff,
where gear such a backpacks may also be left
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Information Quality Act (Section during a climb, but in some cases, is
515 of Pub. L. 106–554) requires Federal conducted at the top of a cliff.
These final supplementary rules will agencies to maintain adequate quality, Trail building means the act of creating
not impose an unfunded mandate on objectivity, utility, and integrity of the new travel routes through the use of tools; or
State, local, or tribal governments or the information that they disseminate. In user-created trails developed through
private sector of more than $100 million developing these supplementary rules, repeated visits to a specific destination. EA
per year nor do they have a significant DOI–BLM–ID–T020–2013–0010–EA
the BLM did not conduct or use a study,
or unique effect on State, local, or tribal Appendix II serves as the baseline for
experiment, or survey or disseminate
governments or the private sector. existing trails on BLM lands.
Therefore, the BLM is not required to any information to the public.
Camping means setting up, occupying or
prepare a statement containing the Executive Order 13211, Actions making use of a place for shelter or overnight
information required by the Unfunded Concerning Regulations That stay.
Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et Significantly Affect Energy Supply, On BLM-administered public land within
seq.). the Castle Rocks area, the following
Distribution, or Use
supplementary rules apply:
Executive Order 12630, Governmental These final supplementary rules will 1. Traditional and sport rock climbing and
Actions and Interference With not constitute a significant energy bouldering are prohibited.
Constitutionally Protected Property 2. Staging is prohibited.
action. These final supplementary rules
Rights (Takings) 3. Camping is prohibited.
will not have an adverse effect on 4. Trail building is prohibited.
These final supplementary rules will energy supplies, production, or
Exceptions: The following persons are
not have significant takings implications consumption, and have no connection exempt from these supplementary rules:
nor will they be capable of interfering with energy policy. A. Any Federal, State, local, and/or
with constitutionally protected property military employee acting within the scope of
Paperwork Reduction Act
rights. Therefore, the BLM has their duties;
determined that these rules will not These final supplementary rules do B. Members of any organized rescue or fire-
cause a ‘‘taking’’ of private property or not contain information collection fighting force performing an official duty;
require preparation of a takings requirements that the Office of and
assessment. C. Persons, agencies, municipalities or
Management and Budget must approve
companies holding an existing special use
Executive Order 13132, Federalism under the Paperwork Reduction Act of permit and operating within the scope of
1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. their permit.
These final supplementary rules will
Author Penalties: On public lands under Section
not have a substantial direct effect on
303(a) of the Federal Land Policy and
the States, on the relationship between The principal author of these Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1733(a))
the Federal Government and the States, supplementary rules is Amanda M. and 43 CFR 8360.0–7, any person who
or on the distribution of power and Dodson, Acting Burley Field Manager, violates any of these supplementary rules
responsibilities among the various Bureau of Land Management. may be tried before a United States
levels of government. These final Magistrate and fined no more than $1,000 or
supplementary rules will not conflict For the reasons stated in the imprisoned for no more than 12 months or
Preamble, and under the authority of 43
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
with any law or regulation of the State both. Such violations may also be subject to
of Idaho. Therefore, in accordance with CFR 8365.1–6, the Burley Field Office, enhanced fines provided for by 18 U.S.C.
Executive Order 13132, the BLM has Bureau of Land Management, 3571.
determined that these final establishes supplementary rules for
supplementary rules will not have BLM-administered lands covered under Timothy M. Murphy,
sufficient federalism implications to the Cassia Resource Management Plan BLM Idaho State Director.
warrant preparation of a Federalism Amendment at Castle Rocks, to read as [FR Doc. 2015–27373 Filed 10–27–15; 8:45 am]
Assessment. follows: BILLING CODE 4310–GG–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:16 Oct 27, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM 28OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_66241/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-27 08:58:00
Document Modified: 2018-02-27 08:58:00
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice of final supplementary rules. | |
| Dates | These supplementary rules are effective on November 27, 2015. | |
| Contact | Dennis Thompson, Outdoor Recreation Planner, at 208-677-6664 or by email at [email protected] Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1- 800-877-8339 to contact Mr. Thompson. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 66033 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR