80 FR 66094 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change to Rule 20.6, Nullification and Adjustment of Options Transactions Including Obvious Errors
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 208 (October 28, 2015)
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 208 (October 28, 2015)
| Page Range | 66094-66097 | |
| FR Document | 2015-27350 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 208 (Wednesday, October 28, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 66094-66097] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-27350] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-76230; File No. SR-EDGX-2015-49] Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change to Rule 20.6, Nullification and Adjustment of Options Transactions Including Obvious Errors October 22, 2015. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that on October 20, 2015, EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``EDGX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange has designated this proposal as a ``non-controversial'' proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b- 4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder,\4\ which renders it effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange filed a proposal for the Exchange's equity options platform (``EDGX Options'') to extend the pilot program that suspends certain obvious error provisions of Rule 20.6 during limit up-limit down states in securities that underlie options traded on the Exchange. The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's Web site at www.batstrading.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose Earlier this year, the Exchange received approval of rules governing the trading of equity options on EDGX Options, including Rule 20.6 related to the adjustment and nullification of transactions that occur on EDGX Options.\5\ Interpretation and Policy .01 to Rule 20.6 is designed to address certain issues related to the Plan to Address Extraordinary Market Volatility Pursuant to Rule 608 of Regulation NMS under the Act (the ``Limit Up-Limit Down Plan'' or the ``Plan'').\6\ Specifically, pursuant to a pilot program set forth in Interpretation and Policy .01 to Rule 20.6, the Exchange excludes from certain provisions of Rule 20.6 transactions executed during a ``Limit [[Page 66095]] State'' or ``Straddle State,'' as such terms are defined in the Plan. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75650 (August 7, 2015), 80 FR 48600 (August 13, 2015) (SR-EDGX-2015-18). \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67091 (May 31, 2012), 77 FR 33498 (June 6, 2012) (the ``Limit Up-Limit Down Release''). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The purpose of this filing is to extend the effectiveness of the pilot program of Interpretation and Policy .01 of Rule 20.6 to coincide with the pilot period for the Limit Up-Limit Down Plan, including any extensions to the pilot period for the Plan. The Exchange also proposes to amend a cross-reference contained within Interpretation and Policy .01, as described below. The Exchange notes that trading on EDGX Options has not yet commenced. However, the Exchange anticipates launching EDGX Options in the near future and wishes to update its rules in the interim in anticipation of such launch. The Exchange believes the benefits to market participants from Interpretation and Policy .01 should continue on a pilot basis. The Exchange continues to believe that adding certainty to the execution of orders in Limit or Straddle States will encourage market participants to continue to provide liquidity to the Exchange, and, thus, promote a fair and orderly market during these periods. Barring this provision, the obvious error provisions of Rule 20.6 would likely apply in many instances during Limit States and Straddle States. The Exchange believes that continuing the pilot will protect against any unanticipated consequences in the options markets during a Limit State or Straddle State. Thus, the Exchange believes that the protections of the current rule should continue while the industry gains further experience operating the Plan. Rather than extending the pilot program to a specific date, the Exchange proposes to extend the pilot to coincide with the operation of the Plan, which is also a pilot program.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ Currently, the pilot period for the Plan is proposed to be extended to April 22, 2016. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75917 (September 14, 2015), 80 FR 56515 (September 18, 2015). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange represents that it will conduct its own analysis concerning the elimination of the Obvious Error and Catastrophic Error provisions during Limit and Straddle States and agrees to provide the Commission with relevant data to assess the impact of this proposed rule change. As part of its analysis, the Exchange will evaluate (1) the options market quality during Limit and Straddle States, (2) assess the character of incoming order flow and transactions during Limit and Straddle States, and (3) review any complaints from Members and their customers concerning executions during Limit and Straddle States. The Exchange also agrees to provide to the Commission data requested to evaluate the impact of the inapplicability of the Obvious Error and Catastrophic Error provisions, including data relevant to assessing the various analyses noted above. In connection with this proposal, each month the Exchange will provide to the Commission and the public a dataset containing the data for each Straddle State and Limit State in NMS Stocks underlying options traded on the Exchange, limited to those option classes that have at least one (1) trade on the Exchange during a Straddle State or Limit State. For each of those option classes affected, each data record will contain the following information:Stock symbol, option symbol, time at the start of the Straddle or Limit State, an indicator for whether it is a Straddle or Limit State. For activity on the Exchange: Executed volume, time-weighted quoted bid-ask spread, time-weighted average quoted depth at the bid, time-weighted average quoted depth at the offer; high execution price, low execution price; number of trades for which a request for review for error was received during Straddle and Limit States; an indicator variable for whether those options outlined above have a price change exceeding 30% during the underlying stock's Limit or Straddle State compared to the last available option price as reported by OPRA before the start of the Limit or Straddle State (1 if observe 30% and 0 otherwise). Another indicator variable for whether the option price within five minutes of the underlying stock leaving the Limit or Straddle state (or halt if applicable) is 30% away from the price before the start of the Limit or Straddle State. In addition, the Exchange shall provide to the Commission and the public assessments relating to the impact of the operation of the Obvious Error rules during Limit and Straddle States as follows: (1) Evaluate the statistical and economic impact of Limit and Straddle States on liquidity and market quality in the options markets; and (2) Assess whether the lack of Obvious Error rules in effect during the Straddle and Limit States are problematic. The Exchange agrees to provide the analysis and data to the Commission to help evaluate the impact of the pilot program no later than five months prior to the pilot expiration, including any extensions. If the Plan extension is approved, the next data assessment will be due on December 18, 2015. As noted above, pursuant to the pilot program, the Exchange excludes from certain provisions of Rule 20.6 transactions executed during a Limit State or Straddle State, as such terms are defined in the Plan. The Exchange, however, retains authority to review transactions on an Official's own motion pursuant to sub-paragraph (c)(3) of Rule 20.6 and to bust or adjust transactions pursuant to provisions governing Significant Market Events, as defined in the Rule, trading halts, erroneous prints and quotes in the underlying security, and in connection with stop and stop limit orders that have been triggered by an erroneous execution. The Exchange believes that these safeguards will provide the Exchange with the flexibility to act when necessary and appropriate to nullify or adjust a transaction, while also providing market participants with certainty that, under normal circumstances, the trades they affect with quotes and/or orders having limit prices will stand irrespective of subsequent moves in the underlying security. The Exchange proposes to extend the authority to nullify transactions pursuant to paragraph (k) even in the event of a Limit State or Straddle State for the underlying security, thereby excluding such provision from the pilot program. The Exchange notes that other options exchanges that have a provision governing erroneous trades occurring from disruptions and/or malfunctions of Exchange systems have also excluded such provision from the pilot program.\8\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See, e.g., NYSE MKT Rule 975NY, Interpretation and Policy .03, which excludes paragraph (l) of Rule 975NY from the pilot program; see also, CBOE Rule 6.25, Interpretation and Policy .01, which excludes Interpretation and Policy .05 from the pilot program. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder that are applicable to a national securities exchange, and, in particular, with the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\9\ In particular, the proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \10\ because it would promote just and equitable principles of trade, remove impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of, a free and open market and a national market system. Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \11\ requirement that [[Page 66096]] the rules of an exchange not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). \11\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In particular, the Exchange further believes that it is necessary and appropriate in the interest of promoting fair and orderly markets to exclude transactions executed during a Limit or Straddle State from certain aspects of Rule 20.6. The Exchange believes the application of the current rule will be impracticable given the lack of a reliable national best bid or offer in the options market during Limit States and Straddle States, and that the resulting actions (i.e., nullified trades or adjusted prices) may not be appropriate given market conditions. Extension of this pilot to coincide with the pilot period for the Limit Up-Limit Down Plan would ensure that limit orders that are filled during a Limit or Straddle State would have certainty of execution in a manner that promotes just and equitable principles of trade, removes impediments to, and perfects the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system. Thus, the Exchange believes that the protections of the pilot should continue while the industry gains further experience operating the Plan. The Exchange also believes it is necessary and appropriate in the interest of promoting fair and orderly markets to retain authority to nullify erroneous trades occurring from disruptions and/or malfunctions of Exchange systems without regard to whether the underlying security was in a Limit State or Straddle State. As noted above, this will ensure consistency with the rules of other options exchanges.\12\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See supra note 7. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Specifically, the Exchange believes that, by extending the expiration of the pilot, the proposed rule change will allow for further analysis of the pilot and a determination of how the pilot shall be structured in the future. In doing so, the proposed rule change will also serve to promote regulatory clarity and consistency, thereby reducing burdens on the marketplace and facilitating investor protection. C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit, comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received any written comments from members or other interested parties. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Because the proposed rule change does not (i) significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \13\ and Rule 19b- 4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.\14\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). \14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii). As required under Rule 19b- 4(f)(6)(iii), the Exchange provided the Commission with written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief description and the text of the proposed rule change, at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposal may become operative immediately upon filing. The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest, as it will allow the obvious error pilot program to continue uninterrupted while the industry gains further experience operating under the Plan, and avoid any investor confusion that could result from a temporary interruption in the pilot program. For this reason, the Commission designates the proposed rule change to be operative upon filing.\15\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or Send an email to [email protected]. Please include File Number SR-EDGX-2015-49 on the subject line. Paper Comments Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-EDGX-2015-49. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-EDGX-2015-49, and should be submitted on or before November 18, 2015. [[Page 66097]] For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\16\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \16\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Brent J. Fields, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2015-27350 Filed 10-27-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
![66094 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 208 / Wednesday, October 28, 2015 / Notices
investors and the public interest, as it Commission and any person, other than solicit comments on the proposed rule
will allow the obvious error pilot those that may be withheld from the change from interested persons.
program to continue uninterrupted public in accordance with the
while the industry gains further provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
experience operating under the Plan, available for Web site viewing and I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
and avoid any investor confusion that printing in the Commission’s Public Statement of the Terms of the Substance
could result from a temporary Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., of the Proposed Rule Change
interruption in the pilot program. For Washington, DC 20549 on official The Exchange filed a proposal for the
this reason, the Commission designates business days between the hours of Exchange’s equity options platform
the proposed rule change to be operative 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such (‘‘EDGX Options’’) to extend the pilot
upon filing.16 filing also will be available for program that suspends certain obvious
At any time within 60 days of the inspection and copying at the principal error provisions of Rule 20.6 during
filing of the proposed rule change, the office of the Exchange. All comments limit up-limit down states in securities
Commission summarily may received will be posted without change; that underlie options traded on the
temporarily suspend such rule change if the Commission does not edit personal Exchange.
it appears to the Commission that such identifying information from The text of the proposed rule change
action is necessary or appropriate in the submissions. You should submit only is available at the Exchange’s Web site
public interest, for the protection of information that you wish to make at www.batstrading.com, at the
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of available publicly. All submissions principal office of the Exchange, and at
the purposes of the Act. If the should refer to File Number SR– the Commission’s Public Reference
Commission takes such action, the NASDAQ–2015–125, and should be Room.
Commission shall institute proceedings submitted on or before November 18,
to determine whether the proposed rule 2015. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
should be approved or disapproved. Statement of the Purpose of, and
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
IV. Solicitation of Comments Change
authority.17
Interested persons are invited to Brent J. Fields, In its filing with the Commission, the
submit written data, views, and Secretary. Exchange included statements
arguments concerning the foregoing, concerning the purpose of and basis for
[FR Doc. 2015–27346 Filed 10–27–15; 8:45 am]
including whether the proposed rule the proposed rule change and discussed
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
change is consistent with the Act. any comments it received on the
Comments may be submitted by any of proposed rule change. The text of these
the following methods: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE statements may be examined at the
Electronic Comments COMMISSION places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
• Use the Commission’s Internet [Release No. 34–76230; File No. SR–EDGX–
2015–49]
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/
the most significant parts of such
rules/sro.shtml); or
Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGX statements.
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
NASDAQ–2015–125 on the subject line. Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Statement of the Purpose of, and
Rule Change to Rule 20.6, Nullification Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Paper Comments and Adjustment of Options Change
• Send paper comments in triplicate Transactions Including Obvious Errors
to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities 1. Purpose
October 22, 2015.
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street Earlier this year, the Exchange
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. received approval of rules governing the
All submissions should refer to File Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
trading of equity options on EDGX
Number SR–NASDAQ–2015–125. This ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
Options, including Rule 20.6 related to
file number should be included on the notice is hereby given that on October
the adjustment and nullification of
subject line if email is used. To help the 20, 2015, EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the
transactions that occur on EDGX
Commission process and review your ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGX’’) filed with the
Options.5 Interpretation and Policy .01
comments more efficiently, please use Securities and Exchange Commission
to Rule 20.6 is designed to address
only one method. The Commission will (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
certain issues related to the Plan to
post all comments on the Commission’s change as described in Items I and II
Address Extraordinary Market Volatility
Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ below, which Items have been prepared
Pursuant to Rule 608 of Regulation NMS
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the by the Exchange. The Exchange has
under the Act (the ‘‘Limit Up-Limit
submission, all subsequent designated this proposal as a ‘‘non-
Down Plan’’ or the ‘‘Plan’’).6
amendments, all written statements controversial’’ proposed rule change
Specifically, pursuant to a pilot program
with respect to the proposed rule pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the
set forth in Interpretation and Policy .01
change that are filed with the Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii)
to Rule 20.6, the Exchange excludes
Commission, and all written thereunder,4 which renders it effective
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
from certain provisions of Rule 20.6
communications relating to the upon filing with the Commission. The
transactions executed during a ‘‘Limit
proposed rule change between the Commission is publishing this notice to
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75650
17 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
16 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day (August 7, 2015), 80 FR 48600 (August 13, 2015)
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
operative delay, the Commission has also (SR–EDGX–2015–18).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
considered the proposed rule’s impact on 6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67091
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See (May 31, 2012), 77 FR 33498 (June 6, 2012) (the
15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii). ‘‘Limit Up-Limit Down Release’’).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:16 Oct 27, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00112 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM 28OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_66302/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 208 / Wednesday, October 28, 2015 / Notices 66097
For the Commission, by the Division of the Commission’s Public Reference Member (a ‘‘Letter of Guarantee’’) has
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated Room. been issued for such Options Member
authority.16 by a Clearing Member and filed with the
Brent J. Fields, II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Exchange.
Secretary. Statement of the Purpose of, and
Thus, while not all Options Members
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
[FR Doc. 2015–27350 Filed 10–27–15; 8:45 am] are Clearing Members, all Options
Change
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P Members require a Clearing Member’s
In its filing with the Commission, the consent to clear transactions on their
Exchange included statements behalf (or on behalf of any Sponsored
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE concerning the purpose of and basis for Participants 9 for which the Options
COMMISSION the proposed rule change and discussed Member is a Sponsoring Member 10) in
[Release No. 34–76234; File No. SR–EDGX–
any comments it received on the order to conduct business on the
2015–47] proposed rule change. The text of these Exchange. Each Options Member that
statements may be examined at the transacts through a Clearing Member on
Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGX places specified in Item IV below. The the Exchange executes a Letter of
Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Exchange has prepared summaries, set Guarantee which codifies the
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of relationship between the Options
Rule Change To Adopt Rule 21.17, the most significant parts of such Member and the Clearing Member and
Exchange Sharing of User Designated statements. provides the Exchange with notice of
Risk Settings (A) Self-Regulatory Organization’s which Clearing Members have
Statement of the Purpose of, and relationships with which Options
October 22, 2015.
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Members. The Clearing Member that
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Change guarantees the Options Member’s
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
transactions on the Exchange has a
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 1. Purpose financial interest in understanding the
notice is hereby given that on October
The Exchange is proposing to adopt risk tolerance of the Options Member.
14, 2015, EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the
new Rule 21.17, Exchange Sharing of The proposal would provide the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGX’’) filed with the
User Designated Risk Settings, in order Exchange with authority to directly
Securities and Exchange Commission
to authorize the Exchange to share any provide Clearing Members with
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
of a User’s risk settings with the information that may otherwise be
change as described in Items I and II
Clearing Member that clears available to such Clearing Members by
below, which Items have been prepared
transactions on behalf of the User. The virtue of their relationship with the
by the Exchange. The Exchange has
Exchange notes that the proposed rule is respective Users.
designated this proposal as a ‘‘non-
based on and identical to BATS At this time, the risk settings covered
controversial’’ proposed rule change
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘BATS’’) Rule 21.17, by this proposal are set forth in Rule
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the
which is applicable to the equity 21.16, entitled Risk Monitor
Act3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii)
options platform operated by BATS Mechanism.11 The Exchange may adopt
thereunder,4 which renders it effective
(‘‘BATS Options’’). additional rules providing for Options
upon filing with the Commission. The
Under Exchange Rule 17.2(b), Options Member designated risk settings other
Commission is publishing this notice to
Members 7 must be Clearing Members or than those provided in Rule 21.16 that
solicit comments on the proposed rule
establish a clearing arrangement with a could be shared with an Options
change from interested persons.
Clearing Member. Rule 21.13(a) Member’s Clearing Member under the
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s provides that every Clearing Member is proposal and the Exchange would
Statement of the Terms of Substance of responsible for the clearance of EDGX announce these additional risk settings
the Proposed Rule Change Options Transactions 8 of such Clearing by issuing a Trade Desk Notice.
The Exchange filed a proposal to Member and of each User that gives up 2. Statutory Basis
authorize the Exchange’s equity options such Clearing Member’s name pursuant
platform (‘‘EDGX Options’’) to share a to a letter of authorization, letter of The Exchange believes that its
User’s 5 risk settings with the Clearing guarantee, or other authorization given proposal is consistent with the
Member 6 that clears transactions on by such Clearing Member to such User, requirements of the Act and the rules
behalf of the User. which authorization must be submitted and regulations thereunder that are
The text of the proposed rule change to the Exchange. Further, no Options applicable to a national securities
is available at the Exchange’s Web site Member may make any transactions on exchange, and, in particular, with the
at www.batstrading.com, at the the Exchange unless a letter of guarantee requirements of Section 6(b) of the
principal office of the Exchange, and at providing that the issuing Clearing
9 A Sponsored Participant is defined as ‘‘a person
Member accepts financial
which has entered into a sponsorship arrangement
16 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). responsibilities for all EDGX Options with a Sponsoring Member pursuant to Rule 11.3.’’
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). Transactions made by the Options See Exchange Rule 1.5(z).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
10 A Sponsoring Member is defined as ‘‘a Member
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 7 An Options Member is defined as ‘‘a firm, or that is a registered broker-dealer and that has been
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
organization that is registered with the Exchange designated by a Sponsored Participant to execute,
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
5 A User is defined as ‘‘any Options member or pursuant to Chapter XVII of these Rules for clear and settle transactions resulting from the
Sponsored Participant who is authorized to obtain purposes of participating in options trading on System. The Sponsoring Member shall be either (i)
access to the System pursuant to Rule 11.3 EDGX Options as an ‘Options Order Entry Firm’ or a clearing firm with membership in a clearing
(Access).’’ See Exchange Rule 16.1(a)(63). ‘Options Market Maker.’ ’’ See Exchange Rule agency registered with the Commission that
6 A Clearing Member is defined as ‘‘an Options 16.1(a)(38). maintains facilities through which transactions may
Member that is self-clearing or an Options Member 8 An EDGX Options Transactions is defined as ‘‘a be cleared or (ii) a correspondent firm with a
that clears EDGX Options Transactions for other transaction involving an options contract that is clearing arrangement with any such clearing firm.’’
Members of EDGX Options.’’ See Exchange Rule effected on or through EDGX Options or its facilities See Exchange Rule 1.5(aa).
16.1(a)(15). or systems.’’ See Exchange Rule 16.1(a)(11). 11 See Exchange Rule 21.16.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:16 Oct 27, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00115 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM 28OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_66302/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-27 08:58:10
Document Modified: 2018-02-27 08:58:10
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 66094 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR