80 FR 66584 - Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 209 (October 29, 2015)
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 209 (October 29, 2015)
| Page Range | 66584-66586 | |
| FR Document | 2015-27647 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 209 (Thursday, October 29, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 66584-66586] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-27647] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket Nos. 50-333 and 72-12; NRC-2015-0247] Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Draft environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact; request for comment. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing a draft [[Page 66585]] environmental assessment (EA) and finding of no significant impact (FONSI) for public comment related to a request to amend Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-59, including the general licensed Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, issued to Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (ENO, ``the licensee''), for operation of the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant, (hereinafter ``JAFNPP'' or ``the facility''), located in Oswego County, New York. The requested amendment would permit licensee security personnel to use certain firearms and ammunition feeding devices not previously permitted, notwithstanding State, local, and certain Federal firearms laws or regulations that otherwise prohibit such actions. DATES: Submit comments by November 30, 2015. Comments received after this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the Commission is able to ensure consideration only for comments received before this date. Any potential party, as defined in Sec. 2.4, of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), who believes access to sensitive unclassified non-safeguards information (SUNSI) is necessary to respond to this notice must request document access by November 9, 2015. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods (unless this document describes a different method for submitting comments on a specific subject):Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2015-0247. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415- 3463; email: [email protected]. For technical questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey, Office of Administration, Mail Stop: OWFN-12-H08, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. For additional direction on obtaining information and submitting comments, see ``Obtaining Information'' and ``Submitting Comments'' in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Douglas V. Pickett, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-1364 email: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments A. Obtaining Information Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2015-0247 when contacting the NRC about the availability of information for this action. You may obtain publicly-available information related to this action by any of the following methods: Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2015-0247. NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the ADAMS Public Documents collection at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to [email protected]. The ADAMS accession number for each document referenced (if it available in ADAMS) is provided the first time that a document is referenced. The application for amendment for JAFNPP dated August 30, 2013, was supplemented by letters dated November 12, 2013, May 14 and July 11, 2014, and January 15, 2015 (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML13248A517, ML13317A928, ML14135A327, ML14195A040, and ML15015A637, respectively). Those letters containing SUNSI are being withheld from public disclosure. NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. B. Submitting Comments Please include Docket ID NRC-2015-0247 in your comment submission. The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact information that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in your comment submission. The NRC posts all comment submissions at http://www.regulations.gov as well as entering the comment submissions into ADAMS. The NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove identifying or contact information. If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be publicly disclosed in their comment submission. Your request should state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove such information before making the comment submissions available to the public or entering the comment submissions into ADAMS. II. Introduction The NRC is considering a request to amend Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-59, including the general licensed Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, issued to ENO for operation of the JAFNPP located in Oswego County, New York, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.90. Therefore, as required by 10 CFR 51.21 and 10 CFR 51.33, the NRC has prepared a draft EA and FONSI documenting its finding. The requested amendment would permit licensee security personnel to use certain firearms and ammunition feeding devices not previously permitted, notwithstanding State, local, and certain Federal firearms laws or regulations that otherwise prohibit such actions. III. Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Identification of the Proposed Action The proposed action would permit security personnel at the JAFNPP, in the performance of official duties, to transfer, receive, possess, transport, import, and use certain firearms and large capacity ammunition feeding devices not previously permitted to be owned or possessed, notwithstanding State, local, and certain Federal firearms laws, or regulations, that otherwise prohibit such actions. The proposed action is in accordance with ENO's application dated August 30, 2013, as supplemented by letters dated November 12, 2013, May 14 and July 11, 2014, and January 15, 2015. The Need for the Proposed Action The proposed action would allow the transfer, receipt, possession, transportation, importation and use of those firearms and devices needed in the performance of official duties required for the protection of the JAFNPP and associated special nuclear materials, consistent with the JAFNPP NRC approved security plan. Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action The NRC has completed its evaluation of the proposed action and concludes that the proposed action would only allow the use of those firearms and devices necessary to protect JAFNPP and associated special nuclear material, consistent with the JAFNPP NRC- [[Page 66586]] approved security plant. Therefore, the proposed action would not significantly increase the probability or consequences of accidents. In addition, the proposed action would not change the types and the amounts of any effluents that may be released offsite. There would also be no significant increase in occupational or public radiation exposure. Therefore, there would be no significant radiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed action. The proposed action would not impact land, air, or water resources, including biota. In addition, the proposed action would not result in any socioeconomic or environmental justice impacts or impacts to historic and cultural resources. Therefore, there would also be no significant non-radiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed action. Accordingly, the NRC concludes that the issuance of the requested amendment would not result in significant environmental impacts. The NRC will publish in the Federal Register a copy of the final environmental assessment as part of the final finding of no significant impact. Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action As an alternative to the proposed action, the NRC staff considered denying the proposed action (i.e., the ``no-action'' alternative). Denial of the license amendment request would result in no change in current environmental conditions at the JAFNPP. Alternative Use of Resources The proposed action would not involve the use of any resources. Agencies and Persons Consulted The staff did not consult with any Federal Agency or New York state agencies regarding the environmental impact of the proposed action. IV. Finding of No Significant Impact The licensee has requested a license amendment to permit licensee security personnel, in the performance of official duties, to transfer, receive, possess, transport, import, and use certain firearms and large capacity ammunition feeding devices not previously permitted to be owned or possessed, notwithstanding State, local, and certain Federal firearms laws, or regulations that would otherwise prohibit such actions. On the basis of the information presented in this environmental assessment, the NRC concludes that the proposed action would not cause any significant environmental impact and would not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment. In addition, the NRC has determined that an environmental impact statement is not necessary for the evaluation of this proposed action. Other than the licensee's letter dated August 30, 2013, there are no other environmental documents associated with this review. This document is available for public inspection as indicated above. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 22nd day of October 2015. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Benjamin G. Beasley, Chief, Plant Licensing Branch I-1, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. [FR Doc. 2015-27647 Filed 10-28-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
![66584 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 209 / Thursday, October 29, 2015 / Notices
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville The proposed action is in accordance Alternative Use of Resources
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. with ENO’s application dated August The proposed action would not
20, 2013, as supplemented by letters involve the use of any resources.
B. Submitting Comments
dated November 21, 2013, May 13 and
Please include Docket ID NRC–2015– July 24, 2014, and January 16, 2015, and Agencies and Persons Consulted
0246 in your comment submission. citing letters dated April 27 and October
The NRC cautions you not to include The staff did not consult with any
27, 2011, and January 4, 2012. Federal Agency or New York state
identifying or contact information that
you do not want to be publicly The Need for the Proposed Action agencies regarding the environmental
disclosed in your comment submission. impact of the proposed action.
The proposed action would allow the
The NRC posts all comment transfer, receipt, possession, IV. Finding of No Significant Impact
submissions at http:// transportation, importation and use of
www.regulations.gov as well as entering The licensee has requested a license
those firearms and devices needed in amendment to permit licensee security
the comment submissions into ADAMS. the performance of official duties
The NRC does not routinely edit personnel, in the performance of their
required for the protection of Indian official duties, to transfer, receive,
comment submissions to remove Point and associated special nuclear
identifying or contact information. possess, transport, import, and use
materials, consistent with the Indian certain firearms, and large capacity
If you are requesting or aggregating Point NRC-approved security plan.
comments from other persons for ammunition feeding devices not
submission to the NRC, then you should Environmental Impacts of the Proposed previously permitted to be owned or
inform those persons not to include Action possessed, notwithstanding State, local,
identifying or contact information that The NRC has completed its evaluation and certain Federal firearms laws, or
they do not want to be publicly of the proposed action and concludes regulations that would otherwise
disclosed in their comment submission. that the proposed action would only prohibit such actions.
Your request should state that the NRC allow the use of those firearms and On the basis of the information
does not routinely edit comment devices necessary to protect Indian presented in this environmental
submissions to remove such information Point and associated special nuclear assessment, the NRC concludes that the
before making the comment material, consistent with the Indian proposed action would not cause any
submissions available to the public or Point NRC-approved security plant. significant environmental impact and
entering the comment submissions into Therefore, the proposed action would would not have a significant effect on
ADAMS. not significantly increase the probability the quality of the human environment.
or consequences of accidents. In In addition, the NRC has determined
II. Introduction that an environmental impact statement
addition, the proposed action would not
The NRC is considering a request to change the types and the amounts of is not necessary for the evaluation of
amend Provisional Operating License any effluents that may be released this proposed action.
No. DPR–5, and Facility Operating offsite. There would also be no Other than the licensee’s letter dated
License Nos. DPR–26 and DPR–64, August 20, 2013, there are no other
significant increase in occupational or
issued to ENO for operation of Indian environmental documents associated
public radiation exposure. Therefore,
Point, including the general-licensed with this review. This document is
there would be no significant
Independent Spent Fuel Storage available for public inspection as
radiological environmental impacts
Installation, Docket No. 72–51, located indicated above.
associated with the proposed action.
in Westchester County, NY, in The proposed action would not Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 22nd
accordance with 10 CFR 50.90. impact land, air, or water resources, day of October, 2015.
Therefore, as required by 10 CFR 51.21 including biota. In addition, the For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
and 10 CFR 51.33, the NRC has
proposed action would not result in any Benjamin G. Beasley,
prepared a draft EA documenting its
socioeconomic or environmental justice Chief, Plant Licensing Branch 1–1, Division
finding. The requested amendment
impacts or impacts to historic and of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of
would permit licensee security
cultural resources. Therefore, there Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
personnel to use certain firearms and
would also be no significant non- [FR Doc. 2015–27648 Filed 10–28–15; 8:45 am]
ammunition feeding devices not
radiological environmental impacts BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
previously permitted, notwithstanding
associated with the proposed action.
State, local, and certain Federal firearms Accordingly, the NRC concludes that
laws or regulations that otherwise
issuance of the requested amendment NUCLEAR REGULATORY
prohibit such actions.
would not result in significant COMMISSION
III. Draft Environmental Assessment environmental impacts.
[Docket Nos. 50–333 and 72–12; NRC–2015–
and Finding of No Significant Impact The NRC will publish in the Federal
0247]
Register a copy of the final
Identification of the Proposed Action environmental assessment as part of the Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.;
The proposed action would permit final finding of no significant impact. James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power
security personnel at Indian Point, in Plant
the performance of their official duties, Environmental Impacts of the
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
to transfer, receive, possess, transport, Alternatives to the Proposed Action AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory
import, and use certain firearms, and As an alternative to the proposed Commission.
large capacity ammunition feeding action, the staff considered denying the ACTION: Draft environmental assessment
devices not previously permitted to be proposed action (i.e., the ‘‘no-action’’ and finding of no significant impact;
owned or possessed, notwithstanding alternative). Denial of the license request for comment.
State, local, and certain Federal firearms amendment request would result in no
laws, or regulations that otherwise change in current environmental SUMMARY:The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
prohibit such actions. conditions at Indian Point. Commission (NRC) is issuing a draft
VerDate Sep<11>2014 23:37 Oct 28, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00097 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29OCN1.SGM 29OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_66793/page/1.svg)
![66586 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 209 / Thursday, October 29, 2015 / Notices
approved security plant. Therefore, the would not have a significant effect on Unclassified Non-Safeguards
proposed action would not significantly the quality of the human environment. Information (SUNSI) is necessary to
increase the probability or consequences In addition, the NRC has determined respond to this notice must request
of accidents. In addition, the proposed that an environmental impact statement document access by November 9, 2015.
action would not change the types and is not necessary for the evaluation of ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
the amounts of any effluents that may be this proposed action. by any of the following methods (unless
released offsite. There would also be no Other than the licensee’s letter dated this document describes a different
significant increase in occupational or August 30, 2013, there are no other method for submitting comments on a
public radiation exposure. Therefore, environmental documents associated specific subject):
there would be no significant with this review. This document is • Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
radiological environmental impacts available for public inspection as http://www.regulations.gov and search
associated with the proposed action. indicated above. for Docket ID NRC–2015–0249. Address
The proposed action would not Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 22nd questions about NRC dockets to Carol
impact land, air, or water resources, day of October 2015. Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463;
including biota. In addition, the For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
proposed action would not result in any technical questions, contact the
Benjamin G. Beasley,
socioeconomic or environmental justice individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
Chief, Plant Licensing Branch I–1, Division
impacts or impacts to historic and INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of
cultural resources. Therefore, there Nuclear Reactor Regulation. document.
would also be no significant non- • Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey,
[FR Doc. 2015–27647 Filed 10–28–15; 8:45 am]
radiological environmental impacts Office of Administration, Mail Stop:
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
associated with the proposed action. OWFN–12–H08, U.S. Nuclear
Accordingly, the NRC concludes that Regulatory Commission, Washington,
the issuance of the requested NUCLEAR REGULATORY DC 20555–0001.
amendment would not result in For additional direction on obtaining
COMMISSION
significant environmental impacts. information and submitting comments,
The NRC will publish in the Federal [Docket Nos. 50–244 and 72–67; NRC–2015– see ‘‘Obtaining Information’’ and
Register a copy of the final 0249] ‘‘Submitting Comments’’ in the
environmental assessment as part of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
final finding of no significant impact. Exelon Generation Company, LLC; this document.
R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Environmental Impacts of the
Alternatives to the Proposed Action AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Douglas V. Pickett, Office of Nuclear
Commission. Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear
As an alternative to the proposed Regulatory Commission, Washington DC
ACTION: Draft environmental assessment
action, the NRC staff considered 20555–0001; telephone: 301–415–1364;
denying the proposed action (i.e., the and finding of no significant impact;
request for comment. email: Douglas.Pickett@nrc.gov.
‘‘no-action’’ alternative). Denial of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
license amendment request would result SUMMARY: The U.S Nuclear Regulatory
in no change in current environmental Commission (NRC) is issuing a draft I. Obtaining Information and
conditions at the JAFNPP. environmental assessment (EA) and Submitting Comments
Alternative Use of Resources finding of no significant impact (FONSI) A. Obtaining Information
for public comment related to a request Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2015–
The proposed action would not
to amend Renewed Facility Operating 0249 when contacting the NRC about
involve the use of any resources.
License No. DPR–18, issued to Exelon the availability of information for this
Agencies and Persons Consulted Generation Company, LLC (Exelon, ‘‘the action. You may obtain publicly-
The staff did not consult with any licensee’’), for operation of the R.E. available information related to this
Federal Agency or New York state Ginna Nuclear Power Plant (hereinafter action by any of the following methods:
agencies regarding the environmental ‘‘Ginna,’’ or ‘‘the facility’’), including • Federal rulemaking Web site: Go to
impact of the proposed action. the general-licensed Independent Spent http://www.regulations.gov and search
Fuel Storage Installation, Docket No. for Docket ID NRC–2015–0249.
IV. Finding of No Significant Impact 72–67, located in Wayne County, NY. • NRC’s Agencywide Documents
The licensee has requested a license The requested amendment would Access and Management System
amendment to permit licensee security permit licensee security personnel to (ADAMS): You may access publicly
personnel, in the performance of official use certain firearms and ammunition available documents online in the
duties, to transfer, receive, possess, feeding devices not previously ADAMS Public Documents collection
transport, import, and use certain permitted, notwithstanding State, local, http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
firearms and large capacity ammunition and certain Federal firearms laws or adams.html. To begin the search, select
feeding devices not previously regulations that otherwise prohibit such ‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
permitted to be owned or possessed, actions. select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
notwithstanding State, local, and certain DATES: Submit comments by November Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal firearms laws, or regulations 30, 2015. Comments received after this please contact the NRC’s Public
that would otherwise prohibit such date will be considered if it is practical Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
actions. to do so, but the Commission is able to 1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
On the basis of the information ensure consideration only for comments email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
presented in this environmental received before this date. Any potential ADAMS accession number for each
assessment, the NRC concludes that the party, as defined in § 2.4, of title 10 of document referenced in this notice (if
proposed action would not cause any the Code of Federal Regulations (10 that document is available in ADAMS)
significant environmental impact and CFR), who believes access to Sensitive is provided the first time that a
VerDate Sep<11>2014 23:37 Oct 28, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00099 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29OCN1.SGM 29OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_66793/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-14 15:21:06
Document Modified: 2015-12-14 15:21:06
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Draft environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact; request for comment. | |
| Dates | Submit comments by November 30, 2015. Comments received after this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the Commission is able to ensure consideration only for comments received before this date. Any potential party, as defined in Sec. 2.4, of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), who believes access to sensitive unclassified non-safeguards information (SUNSI) is necessary to respond to this notice must request document access by November 9, 2015. | |
| Contact | Douglas V. Pickett, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-1364 email: [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 66584 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR