80 FR 68484 - Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District and South Coast Air Quality Management District
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 214 (November 5, 2015)
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 214 (November 5, 2015)
| Page Range | 68484-68486 | |
| FR Document | 2015-28278 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 214 (Thursday, November 5, 2015)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 68484-68486] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-28278] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0552; FRL-9936-70-Region 9] Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District and South Coast Air Quality Management District AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve revisions to the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (SJVUAPCD) and South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) portions of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern emissions of oxides of nitrogen (NOX ) from fan-driven natural gas-fired central furnaces for residences and businesses. We are proposing to approve local rules to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). We are taking comments on this proposal and plan to follow with a final action. DATES: Any comments must arrive by December 7, 2015. ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket ID number EPA-R09-OAR- 2015-0552, by one of the following methods: 1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the on- line instructions. 2. Email: [email protected]. 3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901. [[Page 68485]] Instructions: Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or withdrawn. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. If you need to include CBI as part of your comment, please visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html for further instructions. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. For the full EPA public comment policy and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html. Docket: Generally, documents in the docket for this action are available electronically at www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all documents in the docket are listed at www.regulations.gov, some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps), and some may not be publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Gong, EPA Region IX, (415) 942 3073, [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and ``our'' refer to the EPA. Table of Contents I. The State's Submittal A. What rules did the State submit? B. Are there other versions of these rules? C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revisions? II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules? B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria? C. Public Comment and Proposed Action III. Incorporation by Reference IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. The State's Submittal A. What rules did the State submit? Table 1 lists the rules addressed by this proposal with the dates that they were adopted by the local air agency/agencies and submitted by the California Air Resources Board. Table 1--Submitted Rules ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Local agency Rule No. Rule title Amended Submitted ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SJVUAPCD........................... 4905 Natural-Gas-Fired, Fan-Type 01/22/15 04/07/15 Central Furnaces. SCAQMD............................. 1111 Reduction of NOX Emissions 09/05/14 04/07/15 From Natural-Gas-Fired, Fan-Type Central Furnaces. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- On April 30, 2015, the EPA determined that the submittal for SJVUAPCD 4905 and SCAQMD 1111 met the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51 Appendix V, which must be met before formal EPA review. B. Are there other versions of these rules? We approved a previous version of Rule 4905 into the SIP on May 30, 2007 in 72 FR 29886 and a previous version of Rule 1111 August 4, 2010 in 75 FR 46845. C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revisions? NOX helps produce ground-level ozone, smog and fine particulate matter (PM2.5 ), which harm human health and the environment. Section 110(a) of the CAA requires States to submit regulations that control NOX emissions. SJVUAPCD Rule 4905 and SCAQMD Rule 1111 are point-of-sale rules for fan-driven natural gas-fired furnaces. The most recent revisions to Rule 4905 reduced the emission limits for various furnace types to the same limits set in the SIP-approved version of Rule 1111. The most recent revisions to Rule 1111 briefly extended the compliance deadline for one type of furnace. The revisions to both Rule 4905 and Rule 1111 also added a fee option for manufacturers of furnaces who produce and sell furnaces not meeting the new limits within the first three years of compliance. The EPA's technical support documents (TSDs) have more information about these rules. II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules? SIP rules must be enforceable (see CAA section 110(a)(2)), must not interfere with applicable requirements concerning attainment and reasonable further progress or other CAA requirements (see CAA section 110(l)), and must not modify certain SIP control requirements in nonattainment areas without ensuring equivalent or greater emissions reductions (see CAA section 193). The SIP must implement all reasonably available control measures (RACM), including such reductions in emissions from existing sources in the area as may be obtained through the adoption, at a minimum, of reasonably available control technology (RACT), as expeditiously as practicable, in ozone nonattainment areas classified Moderate and above (see CAA section 172(c)(1), 40 CFR 51.912(d) and 51.1112(c)). In addition, the SIP must require RACT for all major sources of NOX in ozone nonattainment areas classified as Moderate or above (see CAA section 182(b)(2) and (f); 40 CFR 51.912(a) and 51.1112(a)(1)). SJVUAPCD and SCAQMD both regulate ozone nonattainment areas classified as Extreme for the 1997 and 2008 8-hour standards (40 CFR 81.305). SJVUAPCD Rule 4905 and SCAQMD Rule 1111 regulate area sources that are too small to exceed the major source threshold of 10 tons per year for Extreme ozone nonattainment areas and are therefore not subject to major source ozone RACT requirements under CAA section 182(b)(2) and (f). Nonetheless, the SIP must implement all RACM/RACT for NOX necessary to demonstrate attainment as expeditiously as practicable and to meet any reasonable further progress (RFP) requirements (see CAA section 172(c)(1), 40 CFR 51.912(d) and 51.1112(c)). A RACM/RACT evaluation is generally performed in context of a broader plan. The SIP must also implement RACM, including RACT, as expeditiously as possible in PM2.5 nonattainment areas classified as Moderate (see CAA sections 172(c)(1) and 189(a)(1)(C)). SJVUAPCD and SCAQMD both regulate PM2.5 nonattainment areas classified as Moderate for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard (40 CFR 81.305). A RACM/RACT evaluation is generally performed in context of a broader plan. SIP rules must implement Best Available Control Measures (BACM), including Best Available Control [[Page 68486]] Technology (BACT), in PM2.5 nonattainment areas classified as Serious or above (see CAA section 189(b)(1)(B)). SJVUAPCD regulates a PM2.5 nonattainment area classified as Serious for the 1997 PM2.5 standard (40 CFR 81.305). A BACM/BACT evaluation is generally performed in context of a broader plan. Guidance and policy documents that we use to evaluate enforceability, revision/relaxation and rule stringency requirements include the following: 1. ``State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for the Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,'' 57 FR 13498 (April 16, 1992); 57 FR 18070 (April 28, 1992). 2. ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and Deviations,'' EPA, May 25, 1988 (the Bluebook, revised January 11, 1990). 3. ``Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule Deficiencies,'' EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001 (the Little Bluebook). 4. ``State Implementation Plans; Nitrogen Oxides Supplement to the General Preamble; Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 Implementation of Title I; Proposed Rule,'' (the NOX Supplement), 57 FR 55620, November 25, 1992. 5. ``Improving Air Quality with Economic Incentive Programs,'' EPA, January 2001 (EPA-452/R-01-001). B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria? We believe these rules are consistent with CAA requirements and relevant guidance regarding enforceability, stringency and SIP revisions. The TSDs have more information on our evaluation. C. Public Comment and Proposed Action As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA proposes to fully approve the submitted rules because we believe they fulfills all relevant requirements. We will accept comments from the public on this proposal until December 7, 2015. Unless we receive convincing new information during the comment period, we intend to publish a final approval action that will incorporate these rules into the federally enforceable SIP. While we are proposing to fully approve the rules, the TSDs discuss why fee provisions in these rules limit the creditable emission reductions from these rules in some CAA planning actions. III. Incorporation by Reference In this rule, the EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference the SJVUAPCD and SCAQMD rules as described in Table 1 of this notice. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents available electronically through www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at the appropriate EPA office (see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble for more information). IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations (CAA section 110(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a)). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Act. Accordingly, this proposed action merely proposes to approve State law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law. For that reason, this proposed action:Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993); Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to address disproportionate human health or environmental effects with practical, appropriate, and legally permissible methods under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: October 19, 2015. Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, Region IX. [FR Doc. 2015-28278 Filed 11-4-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![68484 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 214 / Thursday, November 5, 2015 / Proposed Rules
• Is not a significant regulatory action Tennessee, to report actual emissions of for the approval is set forth in the direct
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR volatile organic compounds and oxides final rule and incorporated by reference
28355, May 22, 2001); of nitrogen to the County Department herein. If no adverse comments are
• Is not subject to requirements of annually. These changes amend the received in response to this rule, no
section 12(d) of the National Knox County Air Quality Management further activity is contemplated. If EPA
Technology Transfer and Advancement Regulations in the Knox County portion receives adverse comments, the direct
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because of the Tennessee SIP to reflect the State final rule will be withdrawn and all
application of those requirements would of Tennessee’s SIP-approved emissions adverse comments received will be
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; statement requirements for Knox addressed in a subsequent final rule
• Does not provide EPA with the County. This proposed action is being based on this proposed rule. EPA will
discretionary authority to address, as taken pursuant to the Clean Air Act and not institute a second comment period
appropriate, disproportionate human its implementing regulations. on this document. Any parties
health or environmental effects, using DATES: Comments must be received on interested in commenting on this
practicable and legally permissible or before December 7, 2015. document should do so at this time.
methods, under Executive Order 12898 ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, Dated: October 20, 2015.
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994); and identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04– Heather McTeer Toney,
• Is not approved to apply on any OAR–2015–0456 by one of the following Regional Administrator, Region 4.
Indian reservation land or in any other methods: [FR Doc. 2015–28106 Filed 11–4–15; 8:45 am]
area where EPA or an Indian tribe has 1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the
demonstrated that a tribe has BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
on-line instructions for submitting
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian comments.
country, the proposed rule does not 2. Email: R4–ARMS@epa.gov. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
have tribal implications and will not 3. Fax: (404) 562–9019. AGENCY
impose substantial direct costs on tribal 4. Mail: ‘‘EPA–R04–OAR–2015–
governments or preempt tribal law as 0456’’, Air Regulatory Management 40 CFR Part 52
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 Section (formerly Regulatory
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). [EPA–R09–OAR–2015–0552; FRL–9936–70–
Development Section), Air Planning and Region 9]
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides
and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Approval of California Air Plan
Environmental protection, Air
Environmental Protection Agency, Revisions, San Joaquin Valley Unified
pollution control, Hydrocarbons,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Air Pollution Control District and South
Incorporation by reference,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Coast Air Quality Management District
Intergovernmental relations, Reporting
5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Lynorae
and recordkeeping requirements, AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Benjamin, Chief, Air Regulatory
Volatile organic compounds. Agency (EPA).
Management Section, Air Planning and
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides ACTION: Proposed rule.
Dated: October 27, 2015. and Toxics Management Division, U.S.
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Samuel Coleman, Environmental Protection Agency,
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6. Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
revisions to the San Joaquin Valley
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Such
[FR Doc. 2015–28277 Filed 11–4–15; 8:45 am] Unified Air Pollution Control District
deliveries are only accepted during the
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P (SJVUAPCD) and South Coast Air
Regional Office’s normal hours of
Quality Management District
operation. The Regional Office’s official
(SCAQMD) portions of the California
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION hours of business are Monday through
State Implementation Plan (SIP). These
AGENCY Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
revisions concern emissions of oxides of
Federal holidays.
nitrogen (NOX) from fan-driven natural
40 CFR Part 52 Please see the direct final rule which
gas-fired central furnaces for residences
is located in the Rules section of this
[EPA–R04–OAR–2015–0456; FRL–9936–56– and businesses. We are proposing to
Federal Register for detailed
Region 4] approve local rules to regulate these
instructions on how to submit
emission sources under the Clean Air
Air Plan Approval; TN; Knox County comments.
Act (CAA or the Act). We are taking
Emissions Statements FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: comments on this proposal and plan to
Tiereny Bell, Air Regulatory follow with a final action.
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Management Section, Air Planning and DATES: Any comments must arrive by
Agency (EPA).
Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides December 7, 2015.
ACTION: Proposed rule. and Toxics Management Division, U.S.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Environmental Protection Agency,
identified by docket ID number EPA–
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
R09–OAR–2015–0552, by one of the
changes to the Tennessee state Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Ms. Bell
following methods:
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
implementation plan (SIP) submitted by can be reached at (404) 562–9088 and 1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
the State of Tennessee, through the via electronic mail at www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
Tennessee Department of Environment bell.tiereny@epa.gov. instructions.
and Conservation on behalf of the Knox SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For 2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
County Department of Air Quality additional information, see the direct 3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel
Management (County Department), on final rule which is published in the (Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection
March 14, 2014, and May 14, 2015, that Rules and Regulations section of this Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
require certain sources in Knox County, Federal Register. A detailed rationale San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:36 Nov 04, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\05NOP1.SGM 05NOP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_68698/page/1.svg)
![68486 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 214 / Thursday, November 5, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Technology (BACT), in PM2.5 III. Incorporation by Reference application of those requirements would
nonattainment areas classified as In this rule, the EPA is proposing to be inconsistent with the CAA; and
Serious or above (see CAA section include in a final EPA rule regulatory • Does not provide the EPA with the
189(b)(1)(B)). SJVUAPCD regulates a text that includes incorporation by discretionary authority to address
PM2.5 nonattainment area classified as reference. In accordance with disproportionate human health or
Serious for the 1997 PM2.5 standard (40 requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is environmental effects with practical,
CFR 81.305). A BACM/BACT evaluation proposing to incorporate by reference appropriate, and legally permissible
is generally performed in context of a the SJVUAPCD and SCAQMD rules as methods under Executive Order 12898
broader plan. described in Table 1 of this notice. The (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
Guidance and policy documents that EPA has made, and will continue to In addition, the SIP is not approved
we use to evaluate enforceability, make, these documents available to apply on any Indian reservation land
revision/relaxation and rule stringency electronically through or in any other area where the EPA or
requirements include the following: www.regulations.gov and in hard copy an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
at the appropriate EPA office (see the tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
1. ‘‘State Implementation Plans; Indian country, the rule does not have
General Preamble for the ADDRESSES section of this preamble for
more information). tribal implications and will not impose
Implementation of Title I of the Clean substantial direct costs on tribal
Air Act Amendments of 1990,’’ 57 FR IV. Statutory and Executive Order governments or preempt tribal law as
13498 (April 16, 1992); 57 FR 18070 Reviews specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
(April 28, 1992). FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
2. ‘‘Issues Relating to VOC Regulation required to approve a SIP submission
Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
that complies with the provisions of the
Deviations,’’ EPA, May 25, 1988 (the Act and applicable Federal regulations Environmental protection, Air
Bluebook, revised January 11, 1990). (CAA section 110(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a)). pollution control, Incorporation by
3. ‘‘Guidance Document for Correcting Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Common VOC & Other Rule EPA’s role is to approve State choices, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
Deficiencies,’’ EPA Region 9, August 21, provided that they meet the criteria of matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
2001 (the Little Bluebook). the Act. Accordingly, this proposed requirements.
4. ‘‘State Implementation Plans; action merely proposes to approve State Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Nitrogen Oxides Supplement to the law as meeting Federal requirements Dated: October 19, 2015.
General Preamble; Clean Air Act and does not impose additional Jared Blumenfeld,
Amendments of 1990 Implementation of requirements beyond those imposed by Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Title I; Proposed Rule,’’ (the NOX State law. For that reason, this proposed
[FR Doc. 2015–28278 Filed 11–4–15; 8:45 am]
Supplement), 57 FR 55620, November action:
25, 1992. • Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
action’’ subject to review by the Office
5. ‘‘Improving Air Quality with
of Management and Budget under
Economic Incentive Programs,’’ EPA, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
January 2001 (EPA–452/R–01–001). AGENCY
October 4, 1993);
B. Do the rules meet the evaluation • Does not impose an information 40 CFR Part 52
criteria? collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
We believe these rules are consistent [EPA–R09–OAR–2015–0673; FRL–9936–69–
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Region 9]
with CAA requirements and relevant • Is certified as not having a
guidance regarding enforceability, significant economic impact on a Partial Approval and Disapproval of
stringency and SIP revisions. The TSDs substantial number of small entities Nevada Air Plan Revisions, Clark
have more information on our under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 County
evaluation. U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
C. Public Comment and Proposed • Does not contain any unfunded AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Action mandate or significantly or uniquely Agency (EPA).
affect small governments, as described ACTION: Proposed rule.
As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
the Act, the EPA proposes to fully of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
approve the submitted rules because we • Does not have Federalism Agency (EPA) is proposing a partial
believe they fulfills all relevant implications as specified in Executive approval and partial disapproval of
requirements. We will accept comments Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, revisions to the Clark County portion of
from the public on this proposal until 1999); the Nevada State Implementation Plan
December 7, 2015. Unless we receive • Is not an economically significant (SIP). These revisions concern volatile
convincing new information during the regulatory action based on health or organic compounds (VOCs), oxides of
comment period, we intend to publish safety risks subject to Executive Order sulfur (SOX), and particulate matter
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
a final approval action that will 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); (PM) emissions. We are proposing
incorporate these rules into the federally • Is not a significant regulatory action action on rescissions of local rules that
enforceable SIP. While we are proposing subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR regulate these pollutants under the
to fully approve the rules, the TSDs 28355, May 22, 2001); Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). We are
discuss why fee provisions in these • Is not subject to requirements of taking comments on this proposal and
rules limit the creditable emission Section 12(d) of the National plan to follow with a final action.
reductions from these rules in some Technology Transfer and Advancement DATES: Any comments must arrive by
CAA planning actions. Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because December 7, 2015.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:36 Nov 04, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\05NOP1.SGM 05NOP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_68698/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-14 15:02:58
Document Modified: 2015-12-14 15:02:58
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Any comments must arrive by December 7, 2015. | |
| Contact | Kevin Gong, EPA Region IX, (415) 942 3073, [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 68484 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR